New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#1 2005-08-11 20:20:50

TwinBeam
Member
From: Chandler, AZ
Registered: 2004-01-14
Posts: 144

Re: Weak Stability Boundary transfer for Mars

Anyone have any idea how much less fuel mass a Mars Direct style mission might take, if it took advantage of the 'weak-stability boundary transfer' approach for Hab and cargo, with a separate manned launch to rendezvous?   

Supposedly it's a good fuel savings, which would mean less mass to orbit.  But is it really that big a savings, or are we talking something like 10% - nice, but maybe not worth it for the added complexity and risk to the Mars crew?

Probably the Mars crew would go around the moon and try to rendevous on the way back, prior to the final burn as the Mars vehicle goes past Earth - if they don't make it by then, they could break off and return to Earth orbit - so not a huge risk.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB