Debug: Database connection successful
You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I live in a guilt culture for the most part so I will avoid comments on shame cultures except for basic definitions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guilt%E2% … f_cultures
Quote:
Guilt culture is a societal framework where individuals are motivated by internalized feelings of guilt to adhere to moral standards and socially acceptable behavior.
Definition and Characteristics
Guilt culture emphasizes individual conscience and personal responsibility. In such cultures, individuals often reflect on their actions and feel guilt when they violate their own moral standards. This internalized sense of guilt serves as a mechanism for self-regulation and social conformity. Key characteristics include:
Here I am going to try to reduce my comments about things like sexuality, except for social abuses perhaps. There be great dangers in that house of ill repute.
One of my main targets will be the "Global and Climate Change/Crisis" Hypes.
Let's suppose that in the individualistic "Western" perhaps Christian oriented cultures, there could be such a psychological thing as a "Guilt Account".
This would be an organizing function that would help collections of individuals to establish "Sidewalk" rules. Rules with expectations.
Parents and some organizations somehow establish this in individuals. And individuals have actual emotional responses to guilty feelings.
Lets suppose that some illegitimate power sources have learned how to "Hack" the guilt account.
This happened to some usefulness in the 60's and 70's, but I feel has become criminal at this point.
The problem is if excessive withdrawals are made then the ability of guilt to regulate behavior may expire. People like myself will come to the opinion that I am guilty according to someone's agenda, no matter what I may do. And at some point I come to hold these guilt mongers as hostile forces with bad intent.
In the beginning of the previous turning I may have been regarded as guilty as to not be of the purist race example, or cultural example. We have tended to blame the right for that, although I am not entirely sure.
These days it is more the left that charges on our guilt account.
1)
Let's start with this one "Stolen Land". First of all, the accuser has no authority to make that judgement. Second, I am a citizen of the Earth just like all other humans who I expect to be native to Earth at this time. If in the time of Columbus, everyone was white on the planet and they all spoke English, you would say that one tribe displaced another. The same thing that Europeans were doing to each other in Europe, and the same thing that the people in North America were doing to each other.
It turns out that I have a half-brother who is native American. I am very pleased with that. He have a family of his own. I am pleased with that. I hope that their blood line will multiply. Were many crimes committed on this continent in the past? Yes. Did many races or groups do them? Yes. But it is racist to say that I do not belong on this continent because I am White (More or Less). I understand that at one time the Scotch and Swedes were not considered to be white.
Parts of my family have been here for centuries. A very large part of the "Land Grab" was done by the Federal Government, to protect us from European empires. If those empires had gotten those lands, then we would have ended back inside of one of those empires.
2)
"Global and Climate Change/Crisis":
Here, I am going to name suspects as to who is promoting this and why:
-The Elites of Europe and also the Elite pretenders in North America. These people have never liked heavy industry in the first place. It puts money in the pockets of unworthy people like me, who they feels should be better to not exist, or be a poverty-stricken surf.
-China and Russia. Of course, if they are to convert the world to Communism, stripping us of heavy industry is sensible. After all it was our Heavy Industry not being vulnerable to hostile military actions from abroad, that tipped the balance to our favor.
-Other shame cultures. Most cultures believe that if you are rich, it is because you took wealth from someone. In their minds, we disserve punishment just for doing well. Some cultures may want to forcibly convert us to a religion of some type.
*Are you feeling that you should let these above groups guilt you? Wear you out with endless demands of repentance and demands for "Tribute" which they may call "Reparations".
If someone on the planet demands tribute, I think we should do what we can to give them a bad time.
3)
Gender: (This is a very dangerous one):
It used to be that Church Ladies, pushed the Minister/Priest around to get what they wanted.
Then we started getting "Churchianity". Same stuff, but no formal religious leader, just a social leader.
Then we got "Girlianity". The dehumanization of Men. Bears are better than Men.
What is happening now iis not much better than a house of ill repute. Basically, negotiating with genders to play their parts (Whatever that is), for material goods.
In a Prostitution culture, the last thing you want to do is have healthy citizens. Like creating drug addicts, you want to get them hooked on the idea that the arrangements Money for Honey. Even in marriage. I do understand that the Male if possible, should do as well as possible to contribute to the material needs of his family.
We have perverted rules, to support the house of prostitution. They seem like good morals but some are not.
Have you ever considered how it is that people in primitive cultures could run around naked, all genders and all ages and not self-destruct?
Have you considered that by inflicting excessive partitioning people become poorly imprinted to their natural way of being?
As the southern saying is said to go, "I have no dog in that fight". As I have no marriage or children. I just can't stand how stupid the public is about this.
Anyway, me feel guilty now? NO!
I feel happy that at least I have seen though this "Halo of Lies".
Drastic actions from me. Do I need special attention. No, not really, I am quite comfortable and feel guilt only for the things I think I should hold it for.
I think I have become well adjusted.
Ending Pending ![]()
Last edited by Void (2025-11-18 07:39:24)
Is it possible that the root of political science claims is to produce white collar jobs for people who paid for an education and do not want a real job?
Offline
Like button can go here
About #3 of the first post. Exploitation of the male mating drive for money and power.
Choosing to confuse the public to make that more possible.
Hatred of common people to the extent of trying to weed out the "Undesirables".
My point is we cannot really rid ourselves of these people who try to exploit our guilt accounts while having no remorse in doing it.
But don't automatically accept the spiritual bills they send to you, don't pay them automatically. (Pay your honest money bills if you are needing to), Consider the possibility that the authority they pose as could be false to some degree. And consider that they may be gas lighting us.
Don't pave the highway to hell for them to lock you in their illusions which may not be reality at all.
Ending Pending ![]()
Last edited by Void (2025-11-18 07:46:52)
Is it possible that the root of political science claims is to produce white collar jobs for people who paid for an education and do not want a real job?
Offline
Like button can go here
I have decided to take a chance that rational thinking will consider this post.
A long time ago I read a book: "Book: "The evolution of human sexuality, by Donald Symons".
I base much of what I believe about human sexuality on that book.
Copilot Search:
The Evolution of Human Sexuality by Donald Symons
The book "The Evolution of Human Sexuality" by Donald Symons is a comprehensive exploration of human sexuality from an evolutionary perspective. Symons argues that the differences between men and women in sexual behavior and attitudes are innate, and that it is impossible to achieve identical sexualities in males and females. The book is organized into chapters that cover various aspects of human sexuality, including:
Chapter One: Introduces basic evolutionary concepts.
Chapter Two: Discusses the difficulties in applying these concepts to human beings.
Chapters Three and Four: Focus on the female and male sexual natures, respectively.
Chapters Five and Six: Explores intrasexual competition and sexual choice.
Chapter Seven: Examines the desire for sexual variety, emphasizing male sexuality.
Chapter Eight: Integrates earlier material and argues that sexual intercourse is understood as a service or favor that females render to males.
Chapter Nine: Tests the hypothesis that male and female sexuality differ by nature with independent evidence.
Chapter Ten: Recapitulates the book's major themes.
The book has been influential in the field of human sociobiology and is often used as a textbook. It has received both positive and negative reviews, with some critics questioning Symons's explanations and others finding it a classic work on human sexual evolution.
6
I have come to regard the idea of chemical and surgery mutilation of those not yet past puberty and even full adulthood as a crime.
Those who promote it are criminals in my judgement.
Puberty is a special stretch of formation of a human.
Before that girls and boys associate rather well.
At the onset of puberty, girls bond with girls, and boys bond with boys.
Maybe we could call this Homobonding. While it could involve Homosexual activities, it usually does not.
This is actually quite sensible, as during puberty, it is possible to create a pregnancy, and that would be dangerous to individuals with insufficient development. Obviously a danger to a pregnant girl, but also dangerous to both genders, as the additional burden of either the birth of a child is something they are not ready to supply, or the death of the girl, reduces chances of having children later.
At the completion of puberty, typically girls and boys rediscover each other, as it becomes safer to risk a pregnancy. Even boys who have perhaps done.
Homobonding (Things like Sportspals, or the equivalent for Girls)
Homocontaxuality (Touching)
Homosexual (You know)
Activities are likely to become more Heterosexual.
So, I consider it very wrong to prompt children going through puberty to think that they have gender confusion. They probably do, and usually when the finish growing up they will become dominantly Heterosexual.
I consider that those who promote the mutilation of children are either ignorant or may have a malice such as eugenic intentions, or perhaps a desire to cripple a society or a conceit that they can accelerate a social change to create a new reality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accelerationism
Here is a further search for Accelerationism: https://www.bing.com/search?q=Accelerat … pc=EDGEXST
We should be very careful who we consider to be "Experts".
Ending Pending ![]()
Last edited by Void (Today 10:00:39)
Is it possible that the root of political science claims is to produce white collar jobs for people who paid for an education and do not want a real job?
Offline
Like button can go here
Pages: 1