Debug: Database connection successful
You are not logged in.
If allowed I will start this.
It has occurred to me that while dry climates may favor PV or Solar Thermal energy, moist climates may do well with Organic-Pyrolysis Solar Energy Methods.
If we are to believe Tony Seba and RethinkX, then Precision Fermentation and Cellular Agriculture will replace the bulk of farm lands. Typically farm lands have higher moisture levels than deserts and so might be returned to forest in many situations. If left untended this would eventually lead to forest fires that would degrade air quality.
So, I suggest "Groomed Forest Lands", managed for the benefit of people. While such land may not be ideal for solar, it might support solar that is used in order to conduct pyrolysis of excessive brush undergrowth and other excess organic matter, to produce Hydrocarbons and Biochar. This would to some extent resemble what apparently was done in the Amazon some centuries ago.
The Biochar would be used in improve the soil and to sequester Carbon from the atmosphere if that was considered wise to do.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biochar
A land which is not considered suitable for solar energy is Great Britan, but of course wind is a form of solar energy for the most part, and they do have wind of several types.
Based entirely and only on my opinion, the last fourth turning of America, was headed in the direction of greater urbanization and the destruction of high-quality family life. The creation of the "Urban Monoculture".
Here in this next turning, we may be able to reverse that, as if it is true that a lot of farmlands will go Ferrel, we can intend to groom it instead and create environments that are better for raising high quality citizens. And produce Hydrocarbons and some wood products as well.
This will help us to punish the slum lords and ghetto masters who have been working to ruin our worlds.
I chose GB as it is not a land that most people think of for solar energy. Of course, at least half of North America might be suitable to this sort of thing as well, and of course vast parts of the world.
Urban Monoculture is not my concept: https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … &FORM=VIRE
I don't have a vendetta to change other people's "X" practices, but I don't think that the urban environment is good for children.
Ending Pending
Last edited by Void (2025-08-15 08:23:56)
Is it possible that the root of political science claims is to produce white collar jobs for people who paid for an education and do not want a real job?
Offline
Like button can go here
I can further argue that with Starlink and the expansion of useful robotic labor, the need for centralization is reduced.
Also, solar energy is distributed across the Earth, it is not centralized nearly as much as fossil fuels.
Ending Pending
Is it possible that the root of political science claims is to produce white collar jobs for people who paid for an education and do not want a real job?
Offline
Like button can go here
A society might become less subjected to predatory factors if distributed more.
For instance, I suggest that Covid-19, of course like a subway, or a city bus. Greater distribution means that virus expelled by an infected human is mathematically less likely to find another host.
As for criminal behaviors of some of the personal types, up close, you force the criminal to travel more to find its victims. This consumes the criminals time, energy, and wealth more greatly. And in a world where electric vehicles are the primary method of travel with cameras on these vehicles, a criminal is going to leave a trail for correctors to follow. And correction will more often follow the criminal.
Ending Pending
Last edited by Void (2025-08-15 08:55:57)
Is it possible that the root of political science claims is to produce white collar jobs for people who paid for an education and do not want a real job?
Offline
Like button can go here