You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
*I apologize if this has been posted previously at the boards; I don't recall that it has. I was a bit surprised with the tally so far.
The poll reads:
President Bush is expected to announce a new mandate for NASA. What should it be?
Humans on Mars.
Returning humanity to the Moon.
Energy-beaming power satellites.
--Cindy
We all know [i]those[/i] Venusians: Doing their hair in shock waves, smoking electrical coronas, wearing Van Allen belts and resting their tiny elbows on a Geiger counter...
--John Sladek (The New Apocrypha)
Offline
The sad thing is that some people actually voted for the energy-beaming satellites.
Offline
Thanks, Cindy!
I would have missed the chance to vote if you hadn't given the 'heads up' on this.
Oh, in case you were wondering, I voted for 'Humans on Mars'.
NO! ... REALLY?!!! :laugh:
The word 'aerobics' came about when the gym instructors got together and said: If we're going to charge $10 an hour, we can't call it Jumping Up and Down. - Rita Rudner
Offline
Thanks, Cindy!
I would have missed the chance to vote if you hadn't given the 'heads up' on this.
Oh, in case you were wondering, I voted for 'Humans on Mars'.
NO! ... REALLY?!!! :laugh:
*Shaun! I'm...I'm shocked! I'm utterly flabberghasted! You chose Humans on Mars?! Whatever possessed you, my good man??
And what a crazy coincidence...I voted the same way! As a friend of mine was fond of saying: "Who'dathunk?"
--Cindy :;):
We all know [i]those[/i] Venusians: Doing their hair in shock waves, smoking electrical coronas, wearing Van Allen belts and resting their tiny elbows on a Geiger counter...
--John Sladek (The New Apocrypha)
Offline
Ehh... Knowing bush its probably space nukes ,
but I voted Humans to mars.
The MiniTruth passed its first act #001, comname: PATRIOT ACT on October 26, 2001.
Offline
Thanks for the heads up on that one.
[i]the early bird may get the worm, but it's the second mouse that gets the cheese[/i]
Offline
Humans on Mars--even one way, for two or more (and 4-years' provisions).
Offline
Humans on Mars--even one way, for two or more (and 4-years' provisions).
what do you mean by 'even one way?' do you mean send humans who won't ever return and give em supplies to live 4 years?
i may have misunderstood the meaning, but it does bring up an interesting point in my mind after having observed the enthusiasm of the New Mars clientele: putting aside the public uproar that would result, i wonder if anybody would volunteer for a suicide humans-to-mars mission? i wonder how many people believe in the cause to that extent...?
(i think this idea may have been put into my head by robert L. forward's "rocheworld", which used a similar plot device for an interstellar mission.)
You can stand on a mountaintop with your mouth open for a very long time before a roast duck flies into it. -Chinese Proverb
Offline
I might be willing to go on a one-way mission if I were going with poeple I could get along with and if I had suplies/equipment sufficient to survive on Mars indefinately. I would not go on a mission where the plan is to starve to death after 4 years.
Offline
Pages: 1