New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#26 2023-09-07 07:10:17

Mars_B4_Moon
Member
Registered: 2006-03-23
Posts: 9,267

Re: CANZUK alliance

Rishi Sunak gives the go-ahead for the UK to re-join the EU’s €95.5 billion Horizon science program

https://twitter.com/BBCAmos/status/1699432689588199732

Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2023-09-07 07:10:26)

Offline

#27 2024-03-06 11:49:53

Calliban
Member
From: Northern England, UK
Registered: 2019-08-18
Posts: 3,446

Re: CANZUK alliance

Interesting.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hgGB8oYbq6s

The CANZUK idea would be a global partnership of four nations on trade and national security.  It wouldn't have been possible before BREXIT, because EU rules do not allow individual members their own trade policy.  Compared to the EU and NAFTA, CANZUK would probably allow greater individual national autonomy.  I cannot for example see London or Cambera objecting to Canada pursuing a specific military technology that they are interested in.  But members would pool resources in developing technologies that would be too expensive for any individual nation.

This arrangement is clearly very different to the pre WW2 concept of the British empire.  The dominions have fully developed economies now with populations approaching the UK.  The UK is simply too small an economy to replace the US as security guarantor.  It makes more sense now to develop this as an equal partnership of nations.  Whilst Australia, UK and New Zealand are all much smaller economies than the US, a CANZUK deal can at least offer more dignified trade terms to Canada than what they get from the US.  They wouldn't require Canadians to sell their sole just for the opportunity to do business with them.  If it came down to a straight choice between the two, that would be important.  But my guess is that Canada would want membership of both.  It is a question of whether the US would allow that.

CANZUK would have enough money and a big enough tax base, to support a superpower military against the threat presented by China.  Probably only about half the manpower of the US military overall, but more heavily skewed towards naval power.  In terms of navy, it could be a peer partner to the US, which would substantially increase NATO capabilities.  The downside is that that navy needs to support 4 nations at different corners of the Earth.  That will spread it more thinly.

Last edited by Calliban (2024-03-06 12:01:05)


"Plan and prepare for every possibility, and you will never act. It is nobler to have courage as we stumble into half the things we fear than to analyse every possible obstacle and begin nothing. Great things are achieved by embracing great dangers."

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB