You are not logged in.
It seems that US congress has advised NASA to study projects to explore the jovian moon Europa.There will be a lot of lobbying as always happens with each space mission as to the funds that should be allocated for such a mission.For further details visit The Planetary Society website.
Offline
I thought this had been a given for a couple of years now?
Offline
Planetary radio have a new show about exploring Europa for life, it's online here
[color=darkred]Let's go to Mars and far beyond - triple NASA's budget ![/color] [url=irc://freenode#space] #space channel !! [/url] [url=http://www.youtube.com/user/c1cl0ps] - videos !!![/url]
Offline
In the LPSC,scientists have been discussing which target should come first to explore in the outer solar system.Some have even suggested that it would be easier to fund a mission to exploring Titan and Enceladus, since the new findings from Cassini have revealed new tantalizing possibilities for astrobiology.It seems to be easier to get to the water on Enceladus which possibly lies just metres under the surface whereas on Europa,one must dig about 20 km to get to the theorised water ocean.Any votes on this?
Offline
Manned exploration of Jupiter has been theorized in the HOPE mission to Callisto, from which Europa would be probed tele-robotically. This would avoid the worst of Jupiters magnetoshpere.
I haven't seen much data on the radiation environment of Saturn, or the rest of the gas giants for that matter. The radiation may make exploiting Enceladus more difficult. Really, one of the larger outer moons, like Iapetus would be just as good. It really doesn't make a difference fuel gathering wise if the water is frozen or not.
Jupiter is closer, thus more likely. And it would speed of developement of active radiation shielding.
"Yes, I was going to give this astronaut selection my best shot, I was determined when the NASA proctologist looked up my ass, he would see pipes so dazzling he would ask the nurse to get his sunglasses."
---Shuttle Astronaut Mike Mullane
Offline
It looks like finally an auroral footprint from Europa has been identified in Jupiters northern lights alongside that from IO.Whereas IO's footprint is known to originate from its active volcanoes spewing out gases,Europas role is still unclear.More probably it could arise from charged particles interacting with its ionosphere rather than dirctly related to activity on the Europan surface.Or could this be indirect evidence for some kind of tectonic activity on Europa!!!Who knows!!
Offline
Hitting Europa Hard Could Have A Real Impact
by Leslie Mullen
for Astrobiology Magazine
Moffett Field CA (SPX) May 03, 2006
Jupiter's moon Europa is one of the most intriguing places in the solar system to Astrobiologists. An icy shell overlies a deep water ocean, and tidal flexing from Jupiter's gravity may provide energy for life.But while scientists have been talking about developing a Europa mission for some time, so far NASA has not yet sent an orbiter to investigate the moon in detail.
Karl Hibbitts, a research scientist at the John Hopkins University's Applied Physics Laboratory, is working on developing a hyper-velocity impactor that could be carried on a future Europa orbiter.
In this interview with Astrobiology Magazine editor Leslie Mullen, he explains why smashing down into the surface of Europa could provide details about the moon that an orbiter or even a lander could not.
Astrobiology Magazine (AM): You have a proposal for something called the Europa Hyper-Velocity Impactor. Can you give me an overview of how it would work?
Karl Hibbitts (KH): It's a projectile that would go really fast into the surface of Europa, creating a curtain of ejecta. So we could make measurements that reach beneath the solid surface of the moon, measurements that are not possible to make from orbit.
AM: How fast could you get it to fall to the surface of Europa?
KH: 13 kilometers per second. That's how fast Europa is going around Jupiter. You can come in faster than that if you want, but around 10 kilometers per second is reasonable, and that is actually how fast the Deep Impact mission went into comet Tempel 1.
The depth of penetration is largely dependant on the density difference between the impactor and the surface, so you want to make the impactor heavy so it goes down deep. We'd like it to weigh at least 100 kilograms, and much more if we can get it. The ejecta curtain can be a million times more massive than the impactor itself.
The shape of the impactor will also affect the ejecta. You can choose to make the impactor flat, and that will give you an immediate flash from the surface, and then a curtain of deeper material as it burrows down. Or we could make the impactor pointy, which makes it go deeper down but creates a more columnated plume of material.
We want to separate different plume ejecta from each other, so we need to find an equilibrium in how we eject the subsurface material. It's essential for us to do some supporting laboratory work on this to figure out how to provide the best science results. Europa's not a comet, so the results will be different from Deep Impact. We need to simulate its surface composition and properties better.
AM: Some models for Europa say the outer ice shell is between 20 to 100 kilometers thick, with the average thickness of about 40 kilometers. I would not imagine a small projectile could penetrate very far into that.
KH: That's true. It could only go in several meters at the deepest. The goal is to get below the radiation layer.
AM: What is the radiation layer?
KH: It's the layer of the surface that's been irradiated by all the particles and electrons in Jupiter's magnetic field. You can't assume that certain areas are not irradiated, because Europa's ice shell is decoupled from the subsurface. It floats slowly around on timescales of tens to hundreds of millions of years, so at some point in time an area could have been irradiated. So we'd want to target a place that looks like it's been in recent contact with the subsurface.
AM: So underneath that top irradiated layer is a subsurface layer that's not as altered, and maybe more indicative of what the whole moon is like?
KH: Yes. Of course, they are not discrete layers; it's a gradation from heavily irradiated to lesser irradiated. But at some depth, probably more than a meter down, basically it's unirradiated. Any organics would have to be below the radiation layer to survive.
AM: On the surface there're those veins of colored material, and scientists don't know what they are. Is that something an impactor could help figure out?
KH: That is one of the fundamental questions we're trying to answer. Is it a hydrated salt, or is it a hydrated sulfuric acid?
AM: You couldn't figure that out from spectroscopy?
KH: We could if there wasn't so much hydration there. The water ice absorbs the light at some very important wavelengths, so it overwhelms everything. And that gets back to why this technique is so powerful.
Ejecting material from the surface warms it up. Certainly some of it is super-heated, but the rest of it is warmed enough so that the ice would sublimate away and we could look at the non-ice component.
It's very similar to what happened with Deep Impact. Except because Deep Impact hit a comet, the ejecta hung around for hours, while for Europa, the ejecta will only be there for a few minutes. That's because of the difference in gravity -- the gravity of the comet is millimeters per second squared, so things don't move around very fast.
AM: So with the comet, once things sprayed out, there wasn't enough gravity to bring it back home, it was just going to keep spreading out. But with Europa, the ejecta will fall right back down.
KH: Right. And stay closer together, probably. We can study the initial flash, and we can study the material in the plume that shoots out, and those are two different things. The flash will tell us the composition of this non-ice material on the surface. The plume is made from material deeper down, and so the non-ice material there might be different.
AM: One thing we don't understand, given what we know of Europa's gravity and tectonics, is why the surface of Europa is relatively smooth. Why are there no ice mountains on Europa, for instance? Would an impactor tell us something about how the geology works there?
KH: It could potentially, because the way the crater will form in the ice will tell us about the strength of the material which it hits. So if we can image it in high enough resolution in an orbiter's subsequent flybys, then we could learn something about the upper few meters of the surface.
AM: One advantage an impactor seems to have is that it can go to places on the surface that a lander could not. A lander couldn't survive if it fell into a deep crack in the ice, whereas with an impactor you wouldn't have to worry so much about rugged or chaotic terrain.
KH: But even we are susceptible to that problem. So we would not aim for a chaos area; we'd probably want to aim for an area that was as smooth as possible. It would be bad to go into the middle of a crack.
AM: You wouldn't get your explosion?
KH: You would, but it would be very columnated. Or how about if we hit something at a glancing angle, how's that going to affect the partition of the energy into the surface? Our constraints aren't as tight as they are for a lander, but we still don't know exactly what our constraints are. So I have concerns about it that the impact specialists will need to address.
AM: You said that you wanted to go into a recently resurfaced area –- I would think that would be more chaotic than an older one.
KH: It depends on how it's deformed. A young area that's deformed like a mountain-building area on the Earth is going to be chaotic. But how about an area that would have formed very similar to the Columbia flood basalts out West, where you had the ground just open up and the lava flooded everything? That's the kind of area we would like to go into -- young and smooth. Smooth on the scale of tens of meters, so something like pahoehoe flows would be fine for us, but it would really bad for a lander.
AM: What if the ice models are wrong, and the ice isn't thick, and the impactor goes right through the ice into the underlying ocean and disappears with a “bloop!”
KH: That would be brilliant, wouldn't it?
AM: But there'd be no ejecta, right?
KH: No, there'd be huge ejecta. The ocean water's like rock, at those velocities.
AM: So it would be similar to if a meteorite hit the ocean on Earth, creating a huge blast and maybe generating a tsunami.
KH: Those are bigger, but yes, it's the same thing. And, of course, you'd look at an image of the impact crater later and see that we punched through thin ice. So then we would know it would be a good place for a lander to go. That would be a wonderful success, but it's very unlikely.
AM: Are there any contamination issues for the impactor?
KH: No, I already talked to the Planetary Protection Office about that. It self-sterilizes. The impactor would be destroyed because it would disintegrate upon impact. And it would be made of a material like copper, or something that would not be in great abundance on Europa.
AM: Would there be any instruments on impactor itself, or would it just be a big metal ball?
KH: We'd have a camera just like the Deep Impact mission had. A camera would provide some useful information for a lander, because you get surface roughness at a very fine scale at one point. As you approach, your spatial resolution from the camera gets higher and higher.
AM: What are your thoughts about the possibility for a NASA Europa mission, given the current budget issues?
KH: It will happen in the future. Political priorities do waffle, but the science priorities have remained constant for the last 10 years. And Europa has always been a top priority. There are competing destinations, of course –- Titan and now Enceladus, for instance.
But Titan would be a prebiotic Earth –- there's no chance of life there, with the temperature being only 94 Kelvin on the surface. I personally would love to see a mission to Titan for reasons other than astrobiology.
It's easy to get to, you can have a lander, and you can look for some unique things there. But for an astrobiological perspective, Europa is still at the top of the list.
"Yes, I was going to give this astronaut selection my best shot, I was determined when the NASA proctologist looked up my ass, he would see pipes so dazzling he would ask the nurse to get his sunglasses."
---Shuttle Astronaut Mike Mullane
Offline
While there seems to be a consensus on a Europa orbiter,there is still a heated discussion on the type of lander;whether to go for a soft landing on Europa or hard landing.Soft landing means more fuel and less payload delivered to the surface.The characteristics of the surface are not very well known so soft landing can be very dangerous.Better characterisation of the surface needs to be done if soft landing is to be considered.
Offline
Bump to group up similar topics
Offline
Bump to group up similar topics
Offline
JIMO was cancelled but NASA will do a Europa Clipper misson, due to a shift in priorities at NASA that favored crewed space missions, the project lost funding in 2005, effectively cancelling the JIMO mission. Among other issues, the proposed nuclear technology was deemed too ambitious, as was the multiple-launch and in-orbit assembly mission architecture.
. "Europa May Have Seafloor Volcanoes That Could Spawn Life, Says NASA"
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucedormi … 1ee7ea6bbc
Europe’s Jupiter spacecraft enters crucial testing phase. Critical sequence of tests begins in space simulator to prepare Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer
https://www.theguardian.com/science/202 … ting-phase
Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2021-05-30 16:07:44)
Offline
The structural tests of the ESA_JUICE spacecraft are finished as well as the reduced functional tests afterwards. GALA and all other instruments are nominal.
Offline
Underwater snow gives clues about Europa's icy shell
Offline
Constraining Europa's Subsolar Atmosphere With A Joint Analysis Of HST Spectral Images And Galileo Magnetic Field Data
Offline
UT-Austin research into Antarctic ice provides insights into Jupiter’s moon Europa
Offline
NASA's Juno spacecraft makes closest flyby in more than 20 years of Jupiter's moon Europa
https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/juno-ju … -1.6601134
What a view! NASA's Juno spacecraft captures incredibly detailed image of Jupiter's ice-encrusted moon Europa during closest pass in 20 years
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech … uropa.html
The first picture taken by the Juno spacecraft as it flew by Jupiter's moon Europa has been released by NASA
Reveals Europa's surface features in extraordinary detail in a region near moon's equator called Annwn Regio
The image was captured during spacecraft's closest approach within 219 miles (352 km) of surface
Offline
NASA has awarded $600,000 in phase II funding to help scientists develop a mission concept that would see swarms of tiny swimming robots deployed into the subsurface oceans of moons like Europa and Enceladus.
Offline
Jupiter's Europa from Spacecraft Juno
Offline
Exploring Europa possible with silicon-germanium transistor technology
https://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Expl … y_999.html
Europa is more than just one of Jupiter's many moons - it's also one of most promising places in the solar system to look for extraterrestrial life. Under 10 kilometers of ice is a liquid water ocean that could sustain life. But with surface temperatures at -180 Celsius and with extreme levels of radiation, it's also one of the most inhospitable places in the solar system. Exploring Europa could be possible in the coming years thanks to new applications for silicon-germanium transistor technology research at Georgia Tech.
Regents' Professor John D. Cressler in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) and his students have been working with silicon-germanium heterojunction bipolar transistors (SiGe HBTs) for decades and have found them to have unique advantages in extreme environments like Europa.
"Due to the way that they're made, these devices actually survive those extreme conditions without any changes made to the underlying technology itself," said Cressler, who is the project investigator. "You can build it for what you want it to do on Earth, and you then can use it in space."
The researchers are in year one of a three-year grant in the NASA Concepts for Ocean Worlds Life Detection Technology (COLDTech) program to design the electronics infrastructure for upcoming Europa surface missions. NASA plans to launch the Europa Clipper in 2024, an orbiting spacecraft that will map the oceans of Europa, and then eventually send a landing vehicle, Europa Lander, to drill through the ice and explore its ocean. But it all starts with electronics that can function in Europa's extreme environment.
Cressler and his students, together with researchers from NASA Jet Propulsion Lab (JPL) and the University of Tennessee (UT), demonstrated the capabilities of SiGe HBTs for this hostile environment in a paper presented at the IEEE Nuclear and Space Radiation Effects Conference in July.
Offline
NASA has Built a Collection of Instruments That Will Search for Life Inside Europa and Enceladus
Offline
behind the scenes of the Magnetic Test Campaign in Episode 8 of "The Making of JUICE"
Offline
Jupiter Reclaims Title of Planet With the Most Moons
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-ne … 180981585/
The New Generation of Hydropower Dams Let Fish Swim Straight Through
https://reasonstobecheerful.world/hydro … -friendly/
Conversation with Juno's Principal Investigator Scott Bolton about the mission's flyby of Europa (WeMartians Podcast)Other
https://wemartians.com/podcasts/131-jun … ott-bolton
Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2023-08-16 16:12:43)
Offline
Making of JUICE
Offline
This one a NASA Europa Clipper video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_tSU6iB9D0
Robert (Bob) Pappalardo
Europa Mission Project Scientist
NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/people/116 … appalardo/
How did you end up working on the Europa Clipper project?
When I was in college at Cornell University, I knew that I wanted to do something related to astronomy. But it was only once I was in school for a couple of years that I realized there was a research field known as planetary geology, which combines planetary science with geology. I learned about it because Carl Sagan was teaching a graduate seminar on “Ices and Oceans in the Outer Solar System” and, fortunately, he allowed me to sit in on this class. Around the same time, I took a course taught by Professor Joe Veverka, which culminated in a final paper on [Jupiter's moon] Ganymede's grooved terrain. This paper was largely based on the work of Veverka's graduated Ph.D. student, Steve Squyres – who of course went on to lead the Mars Exploration Rover missions.
For graduate school, I went to Arizona State University to work with Professor Ron Greeley, who was a member of the Galileo imaging team. My thesis work there was on the origin of ridges and grooves on icy satellites, focusing on the geology of the Uranian satellite Miranda.
The completion of my graduate work was fortunately timed, as planning for the Galileo spacecraft's upcoming satellite encounters was just beginning. I worked with Greeley on the initial plans for Galileo's imaging of [Jupiter's moon] Europa. I then moved on to Brown University as a post-doctoral researcher working with Professor Jim Head, also a Galileo imaging team member. At Brown, I helped plan all of the imaging observations for the Ganymede encounters by Galileo from G1 (in 1996) through G29 (in 2000), and several of the intervening Europa encounters.
Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2023-08-16 17:22:39)
Offline
Europa Clipper Is One Year From Launch
JPL NASA Public Education Talk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYjGLPUo8OQ
'Our spacecraft is nearly assembled!'
https://twitter.com/EuropaClipper/statu … 1449009336
Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2023-10-20 03:13:33)
Offline