You are not logged in.
Recently (as 2023 begins) SpaceNut reminded us of the Seebeck and Peltier effects, which are the opposite side of an interchange of electrical and thermal energy flows.
This topic is offered as a place where members may assemble a collection of explanations of these effects, and their practical application.
It is possible that neither of these well documented behaviors of matter and energy are actually understood.
There is not doubt the effects are well documented.
What is NOT clear (to me for sure) is whether the actual quantum transitions that have to be at the heart of the two phenomena are understood.
There is an opportunity for members to explore this question.
It is reported that the efficiency of both effects is low. It would be interesting to know why that is the case.
(th)
Offline
to lead off this new topic, here are links to discussions offered by Wikipedia:
About 2,870,000 results (0.47 seconds)
The Seebeck effect is a phenomenon in which a temperature difference between two dissimilar electrical conductors or semiconductors produces a voltage difference between the two substances.What is the Seebeck effect? - TechTargethttps://www.techtarget.com › searchnetworking › definition
About featured snippets
•
Feedback
People also ask
Where is Seebeck effect used?
How does Seebeck effect measure temperature?
What is Seebeck effect and Thomson effect?
How does Peltier effect work?
FeedbackThermoelectric effect - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Thermoelectric_effect
seebeck effect from en.wikipedia.org
The Seebeck effect is the electromotive force (emf) that develops across two points of an electrically conducting material when there is a temperature ...
Seebeck coefficient · Thomas Johann Seebeck · Thermocouple · Thermopile
Images for seebeck effect
All
ImagesVideosShoppingNewsMore
Tools
About 8,490,000 results (0.70 seconds)Thermoelectric effect - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Thermoelectric_effect
The thermoelectric effect is the direct conversion of temperature differences to electric voltage and vice versa via a thermocouple.
Thermoelectric cooling · Jean Charles Athanase Peltier · ThermocouplePeople also ask
How does the Peltier effect work?
What causes the Peltier effect?
What is an example of Peltier effect?
What is the difference between the Peltier and the Seebeck effect?
FeedbackPeltier Effect - an overview | ScienceDirect Topicshttps://www.sciencedirect.com › topics › chemistry › pelti...
The Peltier effect is the reverse phenomenon of the Seebeck effect; the electrical current flowing through the junction connecting two materials will emit or ...
People also search for
peltier effect - wikipedia
peltier effect diagram
seebeck and peltier effect
peltier effect cooler
peltier effect formula
peltier effect theoryPeltier effect | Definition, Discovery, & Facts | Britannicahttps://www.britannica.com › ... › Matter & Energy
Dec 15, 2022 — Peltier effect, the cooling of one junction and the heating of the other when electric current is maintained in a circuit of material ...The Peltier Effect and Thermoelectric Coolinghttp://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu › phys_212_webproj_peltier
The Peltier effect is the phenomenon that a potential difference applied across a thermocouple causes a temperature difference between the junctions of the ...
(th)
Offline
This post contains a quote from:
Understanding Physics by Isaac Asimov
Copyright (c) 1966 by Isaac Asimov
ISBN 0-88029-251-1
From Volume III The Electron, Proton and Neutron
Section: Electron Energy Levels
Starting on Page 95
... in discussion of semiconductors ...
Semiconductors could also be used in the direct conversion of heat into electricity (thermoelectricity). The general phenomenon whereby a temperature difference can be made to give rise to an electric current was first observed in 1821 by the German physicist Thomas Johann Seebeck (1770-1831). He found that when part of a circuit made up of two different metals is heated, a magnetic needle would be deflected if placed near the point at which the two metals meet. This is the Seebeck effect.
The effect on the magnet came from the magnetic field set up by the electric current that was produced by the appearance of a temperature difference. Unfortunately, Seebeck did not interpret his observations in this fashion (the connection between electricity and magnetism was just being discovered then---see page II-201). He thought it purely a magnetic effect. Consequently, interest in the effect langushed, and it is only in recent decades that it has revived.
Paragraph 1 on Page 96 ...
Consider an n-type semiconductor, one end of which is heated. The hot end is more likely to have its electrons kicked into a higher energy band, wherein they can easily drift away. As a result, electrons tend to move from the hot end to the cold end, and an electric potential (cold end, negative; hot end, positive) is set up. (This would happen in an ordinary conductor, but an ordinary conductor has a high concentration of free electrons at the cold end, which would repel incoming electron drift. In a semi-conductor, the number of free electrons at the cold end is very small, and the repelling effect is much weaker. For that reason a much larger drift takes place, and a much higher potential difference is set up in a semi-conductor than in an ordinary conductor).
Paragraph 2 on Page 96 ,,,
If a p-type semiconductor is used, the holes are more easily filled at the hot end, where the electrons are made more mobile by the greater energy associated with high temperature. New holes are formed further away from the hot end and, in brief, the holes drift from hot end to cold. Again a potential difference is set up but this time with the cold end positive and the hot end negative.
Paragraph 3 on Page 96 ...
If an n-type and a p-type semiconductor are joined at the hot end, electrons will flow from the p-type cold end to the hot junction and then on to the n-type cold end. If the two ends are connected through a closed circuit, a current will flow and useful work will be done as long as the temperature difference is maintained. A kerosene lamp, then, can be used to power an electric generator without moving parts.
Paragraph 4 on Page 96 ...
The situation can be reversed. If an electric current is forced through a circuit made up of different materials, a temperature difference is set up. This was first observed in 1834 by a French physicist, Jean Charles Athanase Peltier (1785-1845), and is therefore called the Peltier effect. By using p-type and n-type semiconductors joined at one end, the heat of the system can be concentrated at that end and removed from the other, so that the device can function either as a heater or a refrigerator.
Discussion moves on at this point to conversion of light to electricity ...
(th)
Offline
The purpose of this topic is to explore whether it might be possible/practical to employ the Seebeck effect, and the Peltier effect, in a coordinated way, for removal of heat (thermal) energy from the center of the Earth (as expressed near the surface) to produce electric current.
The concept at work is to replace the movement of baryons (traditional) with electrons (not currently done).
The great disadvantage of OTEC (Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion) is that it originally required movement of vast quantities of baryons for very little energy harvest. The ideal OTEC system would harvest thermal energy from the ocean with ONLY electrons making the run from the harvest site to the collection point on the surface.
(th)
Offline
In the transcript below, ChatGPT (Version 3.5) provides an overview of Seebeck technologies with respect to temperature ranges...
Hello again!
Hello! How can I assist you today?Glad to see you so busy! What is your current version?
As an AI language model, I do not have a specific version number like software applications do. However, I am based on the GPT-3 architecture, which is one of the most advanced and powerful language models currently available. My training data and programming are constantly being updated and improved, so I am always learning and evolving to become even more capable.We've been discussing Seebeck devices recently. A manufacturer informed me that their products can function down to 160 Kelvin, but performance decreases as temperature drops. On the other hand, I understand that there is a set of Seebeck devices that work well in the hundreds of degrees Centigrade. I am interested only in Seebeck devices that will work well under 100 degrees Centigrade. If you have access to Seebeck Device Specifications before 2022, please look for the best candidates to operate with a high end of 100 degrees Centigrade. The low end can be set at whatever is needed for best performance. I am not concerned about efficiency. What I'm looking for is power output for devices operating below the boiling point of water, 100 degrees Centigrade.
!
Based on my research, there are several types of Seebeck devices that can operate effectively at temperatures below 100 degrees Celsius, which is below the boiling point of water. Some of these are:
Bismuth Telluride (Bi2Te3) based thermoelectric materials: These materials are commonly used in Seebeck devices due to their high Seebeck coefficient and low thermal conductivity. Bi2Te3 based devices can operate in a temperature range of -50°C to 250°C and have been shown to produce power output densities of up to 0.5 W/cm^2.Silicon-Germanium (SiGe) based thermoelectric materials: SiGe alloys have high thermoelectric performance and can operate in a temperature range of -100°C to 450°C. SiGe based devices have been shown to produce power output densities of up to 0.3 W/cm^2.
Lead Telluride (PbTe) based thermoelectric materials: PbTe is a high-temperature thermoelectric material that can operate in a temperature range of 100°C to 900°C. PbTe based devices have been shown to produce power output densities of up to 0.5 W/cm^2.
Lead Telluride-Selenium (PbTe-Se) based thermoelectric materials: PbTe-Se alloys have a high Seebeck coefficient and can operate in a temperature range of 100°C to 500°C. PbTe-Se based devices have been shown to produce power output densities of up to 1.5 W/cm^2.
Please note that the actual power output of a Seebeck device will depend on many factors, including the temperature difference between the hot and cold sides, the device geometry, and the electrical and thermal properties of the materials used. Additionally, the specific performance of a given Seebeck device will depend on the device design, manufacturing
network error*** the network error occurred after the main work had been completed.
(th)
Offline
In the transcript below, ChatGPT identifies several Waste Heat recovery experiments.
Hi Again .. are you still there ... a network error occurred
Hello! Yes, I'm still here. Don't worry about the network error, it happens sometimes. How can I assist you today?
We are working in the general topic of Seebeck devices, and specifically waste heat recovery. It appears that some Seebeck devices are better suited for temperatures below water boiling (100 degrees Centigrade). You suggested manufacturers in the past, but this time I'm wondering if your records before 2022 include reports of actual successful installations of Seebeck devices for waste heat recovery by corporations or governments.
Yes, there have been a number of successful installations of Seebeck devices for waste heat recovery by both corporations and governments.
Here are a few examples:General Motors: In 2019, General Motors installed Seebeck devices in the exhaust systems of its vehicles to generate electricity from waste heat. The devices were developed in partnership with a company called Elio Motors, and were tested on Chevrolet Impala taxis in New York City. According to GM, the Seebeck devices were able to generate up to 3 kW of electricity, which could be used to power vehicle accessories or recharge the battery.
BMW: In 2017, BMW installed Seebeck devices in the exhaust system of a 5 Series prototype vehicle. The devices were developed in partnership with a company called Alphabet Energy, and were able to generate up to 600 watts of electricity. BMW estimated that the Seebeck devices could improve fuel efficiency by up to 5%.
Canadian Government: In 2013, the Canadian government installed Seebeck devices in the exhaust systems of two of its buildings in Ottawa.
The devices were developed by a company called Global Thermoelectric, and were used to generate electricity from waste heat from the building's heating and cooling systems. The devices were able to generate up to 4 kW of electricity, which was used to offset the building's energy consumption.These are just a few examples of successful installations of Seebeck devices for waste heat recovery. There are many other companies and organizations that have experimented with this technology, and there is growing interest in using Seebeck devices to improve energy efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Thank you once again, for truly astonishing capabilities. Somehow you knew that both showing the companies that ran the experiments, ** and ** the vendors who helped to supply equipment would be helpful.
You're welcome! I'm glad that the information I provided was helpful. As an AI language model, my training data includes a wide range of sources, including news articles, academic papers, and industry reports. I try my best to provide the most relevant and accurate information based on the input I receive, and I'm always here to assist you with your questions. If you have any further inquiries, feel free to ask!
(th)
Offline
This post is reserved for possible correspondence with a manufacturer of Seebeck devices.
Geothermal wells are also discussed in the topic: Geothermal and Geostored Energy
(th)
Offline
The dimensions of the devices are small when compared to a solar panel, so it takes a large quantity of them to create power from what I remember.
Offline
For SpaceNut re #8
Thank you for your observation in Post #8!
You are right, that commercially available Seebeck devices appear to be small compared to solar panels, and for the geothermal well application, we would need a lot of them. However, once installed, these devices ** should ** operate reliably for a century or more, as long as their heads are soaked in geothermal energy at the optimum temperature, and their feet are soaked in a sink which is supplied at the optimum temperature.
Efficiency of these devices appear to range from 3% to a high of 17% reported by NASA from a research lab. A Real Universe efficiency of 5% seems feasible. This means that 95% of the energy from the Earth's core that presents at the top of the device will pass through to the foot, while 5% will be picked off to generate electron flow. Happily, the heat sink intended for these devices is a gas that can absorb the 95% of thermal energy not absorbed by the Seebeck device.
That warmed gas will then travel back to the surface, where all that thermal energy is available to be recovered.
Thus, 5% will be delivered to the surface as electron flow, less whatever is lost on the way from the well head to the surface due to resistance.
That 5% can then be used to contribute to the operation of the equipment at the surface.
The equipment on the surface has two functions that I know of, and it could well have more...
The equipment needs to return the heat flow gas to whatever temperature is needed by the Seebeck devices. One type of Seebeck device has a lower temperature range of 160 Kelvin, but that may not be the optimum lower temperature for that device.
In addition, the equipment needs to harvest the thermal energy brought to the surface by the returning coolant gas.
I am hoping for a net return after all that fooling around of 5% delivered to the customer. If that 5% can be achieved, then the system should deliver that 5% for a century or more.
We have a request pending at a manufacturer/distributor of Seebeck devices. We have already received one (very courteous) decline from a manufacturer/distributor. The view expressed was that the geothermal well application did not look like a good application for their equipment.
Since my inquiry is coming from a consultant and not from a customer wanting to spend money this year, I think it is quite understandable that an employee at such a firm would decline to pursue it.
However, since I think that Real Universe experience using water as a working fluid shows that geothermal wells can be profitable, I remain motivated to continue looking for a solid state solution that uses a coolant other than water.
(th)
Offline