You are not logged in.
Yes, I know they have been saying nuclear fusion is just over the horizon for the last 50 years. But multiple reports have shown advances from different approaches that suggest significant progress is being made.
Also, the White House convened a summit on the U.S. maintaining leadership in fusion power:
Energy leaders are convening at the White House for a summit on the commercialization of clean fusion energy
Jeanne Jackson DeVoe, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
March 17, 2022, 8:22 a.m.
https://www.princeton.edu/news/2022/03/ … ion-energy
Robert Clark
Last edited by RGClark (2022-03-17 16:12:42)
Old Space rule of acquisition (with a nod to Star Trek - the Next Generation):
“Anything worth doing is worth doing for a billion dollars.”
Offline
For RGClark ... best wishes for success with this interesting new topic with fusion as a theme...
Hopefully it will gather contributions as we go forward ...
For those who might be interested, here is a list of all the topics our members have created with fusion in the title:
Index» Search» Topics with posts containing 'fusion'
Pages: 1
Search resultsTopic Forum Replies Last post
Fusion power in the offing? by RGClark
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 0 Today 16:23:46 by RGClarkThe fusion age has begun. by Adaptation [ 1 2 3 4 5 ]
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 104 2022-03-12 16:35:58 by SpaceNutFusion 360 Autocad Digital Design software by tahanson43206
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 1 2022-01-30 09:31:51 by tahanson43206Hybrid nuclear fission fusion technologies by tahanson43206
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 12 2022-01-05 13:11:09 by tahanson43206Companion for Fission/Fusion as a power source for all human needs by tahanson43206
Life support systems 10 2022-01-02 16:37:02 by CallibanNASA funds Direct Drive Fusion Propulsion by Tom Kalbfus
Interplanetary transportation 3 2021-10-03 14:45:52 by tahanson43206Nuclear Fusion in Orbit or Deep Space High Vacuum by tahanson43206
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 3 2021-08-16 11:36:44 by tahanson43206Fission / Fusion as a power source for all human needs by Calliban
Life support systems 1 2021-06-18 13:23:28 by tahanson43206Fusion propulsion crowdfunding by Rusakov
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 9 2021-02-22 16:52:18 by tahanson43206A hot fusion reactor by Rusakov
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 2 2020-10-29 19:59:45 by tahanson43206Lattice Fusion by tahanson43206
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 2 2020-09-28 17:11:18 by tahanson43206Cold fusion for real? by louis
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 1 2018-06-08 07:18:34 by louisLENR/cold fusion looks real and Japan is leading the way by louis
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 12 2018-02-01 16:27:58 by VoidFusion Power, and Why I'm Skeptical of It by JoshNH4H [ 1 2 ]
Science, Technology, and Astronomy 36 2017-11-30 04:49:53 by elderflowerKinetic impact induced fusion by Antius
Interplanetary transportation 10 2016-10-27 11:50:45 by JoshNH4HCan we use Lockheed's 100 Megawatt Fusion reactor for a Mars Mission? by Tom Kalbfus
Human missions 5 2016-05-08 12:53:26 by Tom KalbfusLow Exhaust Velocity Fusion Rocket by JoshNH4H
Interplanetary transportation 9 2014-10-21 03:03:58 by SpaniardMore credible than Cold Fusion, and maybe a source of Nitrogen by Void
Terraformation 1 2013-03-02 08:35:53 by TerraformerCold fusion (LENR) is for real - NASA says so by louis [ 1 2 ]
(th)
Offline
I don't believe they are anywhere near close in developing a practical machine for power generation. If it happens it will likely be several decades away.
I think we are already very close to meeting all our energy needs at a reasonable cost with wind, solar, hydro, tidal, sea current, wave, waste to energy, biofuels, geothermal, heat pumps and osmotic generation coupled with storage through lithium batteries, iron-air batteries, hydro and green hydrogen.
Yes, I know they have been saying nuclear fusion is just over the horizon for the last 50 years. But multiple reports have shown advances from different approaches that suggest significant progress is being made.
Also, the White House convened a summit on the U.S. maintaining leadership in fusion power:
Energy leaders are convening at the White House for a summit on the commercialization of clean fusion energy
Jeanne Jackson DeVoe, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
March 17, 2022, 8:22 a.m.
https://www.princeton.edu/news/2022/03/ … ion-energyRobert Clark
Let's Go to Mars...Google on: Fast Track to Mars blogspot.com
Offline
This link discusses the latest breakthrough.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/10/europea … sults.html
A fusion energy production of 59MJ over 5 seconds. That is just shy of 12MW. That is mostly neutron energy deposited in the tokamak walls (about 10MW) and about 2MW deposited as thermal energy into the plasma by alpha heating. In contrast, about 700MW of electrical power are consumed to maintain both magnetic confinement and plasma heating.
https://news.newenergytimes.net/2021/10 … s-reactor/
If that 12MW power output can be captured as heat in the reactor walls and converted to electric power with 50% efficiency, this latest experiment would have generated about 1% as much electrical energy as it consumed.
One of the critical limitations in magnetic fusion is the achievable magnetic pressure provided by the confinement coils. The plasma is thermalised, meaning that the energy of individual particles follows a gaussian distribution. To contain the plasma reliably, the magnetic field pressure must exceed the thermal pressure of the plasma (which is a function of average temperature) by a factor of 20-100. This limits the achievable plasma pressure to 5-10 bar. The reaction rate within the plasma, scales with the square of plasma pressure. At the maximum practically achievable plasma pressure with state of the art superconducting magnets (~100T), the achievable power density of a tokamak is no more than a few MW per cubic metres. This is 1-2 orders of magnitude lower than a fission reactor and as we have seen, power generation is far too small to achieve breakeven.
One partial solution to this problem is to scale the whole system up. This naturally increases confinement time, possibly allowing a tokamak to reach breakeven in spite of the above limitations. But the resulting reactor will be huge and scaling up will do nothing to improve the power density of magnetic confinement fusion which remains extremely poor. Ultimately, a workable machine may be achievable. But an economically viable powerplant probably is not, unless a way can be found to substantially increase plasma pressure without introducing plasma instability problems.
Inertial confinement fusion faces an entirely different set of problems, which really deserve a topic of their own. In many ways, it does appear more promising than magnetic confinement, because the plasma density in an imploding pellet is several orders of magnitude greater. But driving compression using lasers is very inefficient. Ion beams are far more efficient, but the technology is relatively less mature. I believe that IC fusion could be a near term prospect. I will explain more in upcoming posts.
Last edited by Calliban (2022-03-18 05:49:06)
"Plan and prepare for every possibility, and you will never act. It is nobler to have courage as we stumble into half the things we fear than to analyse every possible obstacle and begin nothing. Great things are achieved by embracing great dangers."
Offline