New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: As a reader of NewMars forum, we have opportunities for you to assist with technical discussions in several initiatives underway. NewMars needs volunteers with appropriate education, skills, talent, motivation and generosity of spirit as a highly valued member. Write to newmarsmember * gmail.com to tell us about your ability's to help contribute to NewMars and become a registered member.

#76 2021-03-15 11:08:58

Calliban
Member
From: Northern England, UK
Registered: 2019-08-18
Posts: 3,352

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

Relying entirely on light pressure necessitates very powerful lasers.  One way of reducing the required laser power would be to use the sail as a focusing mirror for a thermal rocket.  The sail itself would be aluminium coated polymer.  The focus would carry a crucible made from a high temperature ceramic.  Hydrogen would be fed into the crucible and would boil to generate thrust.

A variation on this concept could make use of microwaves.  The mirror would focus microwaves onto a focus.  Hydrogen fired into the focus would be heated into a plasma, which would transfer momentum to the sail by means of a circumferential magnetic field.  The problem with this idea is the generally poor beam coherence of microwaves.  This concept would only work within a few hundred thousand km of a microwave source, for a sail with diameter 100km.  To achieve high final speed requires high thrust and a lot of power.


"Plan and prepare for every possibility, and you will never act. It is nobler to have courage as we stumble into half the things we fear than to analyse every possible obstacle and begin nothing. Great things are achieved by embracing great dangers."

Offline

#77 2021-03-15 11:18:24

tahanson43206
Moderator
Registered: 2018-04-27
Posts: 16,760

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

For Calliban re #76

Thank you for the reminder of an alternative way to use the Sun's energy to help to accelerate vessels in the Earth/Mars trade.

While the method requires use of precious mass to accelerate the vessel, there might well be a business case that justifies it.  After all, the ** existing ** business case is ** entirely ** dependent upon expenditure of mass from the vessel to achieve the paltry velocity needed for a Hohmann transfer orbit.

You've pointed out that great laser power is needed for the proposed task, but a corollary is the proposition that a LOT of lasers can achieve the collective power output of one large one. 

I note that this conversation is taking place in Quaoar's Intersteller topic.

I'll copy my reply into the new Interplanetary topic, which I think has a much greater near-term chance of implementation.

(th)

Offline

#78 2021-03-16 04:38:07

Quaoar
Member
Registered: 2013-12-13
Posts: 652

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

tahanson43206 wrote:

In a post earlier in this topic, Quaoar showed a link to a paper that reported on study of a particular concept for nuclear fission spacecraft propulsion (the "dusty" method).

The paper contained a table which contained an entry that I did not understand.  Quaoar confirmed that (in his judgement) the display of data from the table was correct and not a misprint

In his reply, Quaoar confirmed that the authors were imagining a projectile to be accelerated by their system that would have an atomic weight of 10 to the 8th power.  Today I continued searching for a molecule of that mass.

I'd like to comment here upon the continuing and obvious advance of the AI that Google is constantly improving to help with search.

I entered the typical crude search request and it produced no useful results (lots of results but not what I wanted).

However, I rewrote the request in normal English: Please find a molecule with an atomic weight of 10^8

This time the top citation is an offering by a PhD chemist for calculation of the atomic weight (mass) of molecules.

I'm going to paste the link and a snippet, and am asking Chemistry majors (eg, PhD in the membership) to please follow the guidelines and post examples of molecules that would have the mass defined by the authors of the paper Quaoar cited for optimum performance of the "dusty" propulsion system.

https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-find-m … ass-608487

By Anne Marie Helmenstine, Ph.D.
Updated November 06, 2019
The molecular mass or molecular weight is the total mass of a compound. It is equal to the sum of the individual atomic masses of each atom in the molecule. It's easy to find the molecular mass of a compound with these steps:


Determine the molecular formula of the molecule.
Use the periodic table to determine the atomic mass of each element in the molecule.
Multiply each element's atomic mass by the number of atoms of that element in the molecule. This number is represented by the subscript next to the element symbol in the molecular formula.
Add these values together for each different atom in the molecule.

The total will be the molecular mass of the compound.

(th)


10^8 is not the weight in atomic unit of a molecule, but of a dust grain of uranium 238, containing 10^8/238 atoms (about 420,000). It's uncommon to express the mass of metallic dust in atomic unit, but the authors treated the grains of the dusty plasma as they were a big molecule.

Last edited by Quaoar (2021-03-16 04:39:41)

Offline

#79 2021-03-16 04:55:11

Quaoar
Member
Registered: 2013-12-13
Posts: 652

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

Calliban wrote:

Relying entirely on light pressure necessitates very powerful lasers.  One way of reducing the required laser power would be to use the sail as a focusing mirror for a thermal rocket.  The sail itself would be aluminium coated polymer.  The focus would carry a crucible made from a high temperature ceramic.  Hydrogen would be fed into the crucible and would boil to generate thrust.

A variation on this concept could make use of microwaves.  The mirror would focus microwaves onto a focus.  Hydrogen fired into the focus would be heated into a plasma, which would transfer momentum to the sail by means of a circumferential magnetic field.  The problem with this idea is the generally poor beam coherence of microwaves.  This concept would only work within a few hundred thousand km of a microwave source, for a sail with diameter 100km.  To achieve high final speed requires high thrust and a lot of power.

Conceptually it works, but it might be very hard to do the engineering: a flat sail doesn't need any rigid stiffening rib and can be kept in shape only by centrifugal force. On the contrary a kilometer-sized spherical or parabolic mirror, acting also as a nozzle for hydrogen, needs strong stiffening ribs, resulting a huge weight.
Probably it may work better to use a smaller (30-40 meters) metallic mirror with a polyethylene  cylinder in the focus as propellant, surrounded by 2 or 3 superconductive coil. Then use the laser in pulse to ablate the cylinder, resulting a high Isp propulsion for interplanetary travels. It's very simple and you have not to dial to the nasty hydrogen.

Last edited by Quaoar (2021-03-16 04:59:08)

Offline

#80 2021-03-16 05:06:33

Calliban
Member
From: Northern England, UK
Registered: 2019-08-18
Posts: 3,352

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

Thin fibres or plates of fissile materials might work better than dust particles, as they can be constrained at each end and cross-linked for strength.  Fission products penetrate about 0.01mm in matter.  So the particles need to be small and fibres or plates extremely thin in order to allow most of the fission fragments to escape with most of their energy.  That is why fine dust is considered.

Interestingly, it should also be possible to use a thermonuclear reactor to generate the neutrons needed to drive fission.  In this case, the fuel does not need to be fissile material, but could make use of fissionable material.  That means 238U or 232Th, which are both far easier to obtain and much safer to handle than 239Pu or 235U.

A probe using a fusion-fission hybrid approach could probably be launched relatively soon and could reach the nearest stars in about a century.


"Plan and prepare for every possibility, and you will never act. It is nobler to have courage as we stumble into half the things we fear than to analyse every possible obstacle and begin nothing. Great things are achieved by embracing great dangers."

Offline

#81 2021-03-16 06:30:26

tahanson43206
Moderator
Registered: 2018-04-27
Posts: 16,760

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

For Quaoar re #78

Thank you for your explanation of the 10^8 atomic mass of a "dusty" fission reactor particle!

SearchTerm:Dusty fission reaction particle size.  See Quaoar Post 78 above.

For Quaoar re #79

Thank you for your exploration of possible designs for the mirror.

SearchTerm:Mirror for interplanetary laser driven sailing spacecraft

Note hybrid of ideas of Calliban and Quaoar evolving in the discussion immediately above.

(th)

Offline

#82 2021-03-17 15:13:25

Quaoar
Member
Registered: 2013-12-13
Posts: 652

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

I have found this interesting article:

https://www.nasa.gov/directorates/space … /PROCSIMA/

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/201 … 014041.pdf

In this study the laser beam is coupled with a neutral atom beam: the neutral atom flux is confined by the electromagnetic field of the laser, which creates a potential well (like the "kagome" used to confine the ultracold BEC atoms) and the atoms act like an optic fiber avoiding the diffraction spread of the photons and increasing the maximum acceleration distance and the final speed of the spacecraft.

The study is about a kilogram sized unmanned probe, so the topic of deceleration is not discussed. For a manned spaceship with laser stations  at both ends of the trip, I have some doubt about the damage produced by the neutral atom impacts during the deceleration phase.

Last edited by Quaoar (2021-04-09 11:31:49)

Offline

#83 2021-06-08 08:31:40

Mars_B4_Moon
Member
Registered: 2006-03-23
Posts: 8,902

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

Solar Sails now back in the news, Ion and Nuclear can produce speeds of 220,000 mph, another possible method for propulsion is a combo of nuclear and Hall-effect thruster, Electrostatic ion thruster, Magnetic sail, Mini-magnetospheric plasma propulsion, a Photon Rocket or something like a Plasma Rocket, in the future is possible more cosmology type exotic concepts will be used like Antimatter rocket but for now the SolarSail has been validated and proven as a possible space flight method.

Australian National University researchers light up our pathway to another planetary system in major scientific breakthrough
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-06-08/ … /100198228

The NASA Breakthrough Propulsion Physics Program (terminated in FY 2003 after a 6-year, $1.2-million study, because "No breakthroughs appeared imminent." but some scientific methods seemed possible?
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/techn … /warp.html

previous thread
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=2438

One danger is how micrometeorites could kill them.

The Planetary Society tested a second Solar Sail after an unsucessful first mission, LightSail 2 was launched on a Falcon Heavy rocket on 25 June 2019.

Last edited by Mars_B4_Moon (2021-06-08 08:34:46)

Online

#84 2022-09-14 04:59:20

Mars_B4_Moon
Member
Registered: 2006-03-23
Posts: 8,902

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

Citizen Scientist leads discovery of cool binary stars, nearly doubling known population

https://www.noirlab.edu/public/news/noirlab2215/



    A citizen scientist has searched NSF's NOIRLab’s catalog of 4 billion celestial objects, known as NOIRLab Source Catalog DR2, to reveal brown dwarfs with companions. His intensive investigation led to the discovery of 34 ultracool dwarf binary systems, nearly doubling previously known samples.

    Brown dwarfs lie somewhere between the most massive planets and the smallest stars. Lacking the mass needed to sustain nuclear reactions in their core, brown dwarfs loosely resemble cooling embers on a huge scale. Their faintness and relatively small sizes make them difficult to identify. Data from sensitive telescopes have enabled the discovery of several thousand objects but just a small subset have been identified as binaries.

    To help find brown dwarfs, the astronomers of the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 citizen science project have previously turned to a worldwide network of more than 100,000 volunteer citizen scientists who scrutinized telescope images to identify the subtle motion of brown dwarfs against background stars. Despite the abilities of machine learning and supercomputers, the human eye is still a unique resource when it comes to scouring telescope images for moving objects.

    “These discoveries were made by an amateur astronomer who conquered astronomical big data,” concluded Aaron Meisner. “Modern astronomy archives contain an immense treasure trove of data and often harbor major discoveries just waiting to be noticed.”

Online

#85 2023-10-07 06:02:33

Mars_B4_Moon
Member
Registered: 2006-03-23
Posts: 8,902

Re: Can we build an interstellar starship with current technology?

Different to the Solar Sail

Europa and Enceladus are the Perfect Targets for a Lightsail Mission
https://www.universetoday.com/163494/eu … l-mission/

Online

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB