The Real Mars

Tmcom · 2020-02-25 06:59:44

Been seeing this video just released by NASA, (well it has been pulled by NASA on TY, or maybe it wasn't posted) but either way l can only find this dodgy YT video and not one from Youtube.

https://www.express.co.uk/videos/613494 … ce-station

So if anyone finds the original please post the link here, so l can take screen images and we can all get a close look at what is very likely a legit, alien craft, (space junk doesn't fly up away from the earth by itself eventhough dimwits say so).

Or it is a lot harder to do with this video, that won't allow a part Laptop view instead of full screen only.

I will post it in the correct section and put a link in here, unless there is little to see then l may put it here, but l suspect that we will see a lot, and l will need to post a Apollo UFO type analysis to get all of the juicy goodies from it.

jorgear · 2020-02-25 10:01:00

Tmcom wrote:

Been seeing this video just released by NASA, (well it has been pulled by NASA on TY, or maybe it wasn't posted) but either way l can only find this dodgy YT video and not one from Youtube.
https://www.express.co.uk/videos/613494 … ce-station
So if anyone finds the original please post the link here, so l can take screen images and we can all get a close look at what is very likely a legit, alien craft, (space junk doesn't fly up away from the earth by itself eventhough dimwits say so).
Or it is a lot harder to do with this video, that won't allow a part Laptop view instead of full screen only.
I will post it in the correct section and put a link in here, unless there is little to see then l may put it here, but l suspect that we will see a lot, and l will need to post a Apollo UFO type analysis to get all of the juicy goodies from it.

Maybe the video of that alien spacecraft is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2eIcSs … =emb_title

louis · 2020-02-25 16:31:28

Thanks Jorgear. One of the best ever UFO vids I would say. Up there with the tic tacs - for two reasons: the matching speed of the craft (I may be wrong but I think all satellites travel at somewhat different speeds) and the way it suddenly shoots off at the end (definitely not the behaviour of a normal satellite.

Have NASA made any comment?

jorgear wrote:

Tmcom wrote:
Been seeing this video just released by NASA, (well it has been pulled by NASA on TY, or maybe it wasn't posted) but either way l can only find this dodgy YT video and not one from Youtube.
https://www.express.co.uk/videos/613494 … ce-station
So if anyone finds the original please post the link here, so l can take screen images and we can all get a close look at what is very likely a legit, alien craft, (space junk doesn't fly up away from the earth by itself eventhough dimwits say so).
Or it is a lot harder to do with this video, that won't allow a part Laptop view instead of full screen only.
I will post it in the correct section and put a link in here, unless there is little to see then l may put it here, but l suspect that we will see a lot, and l will need to post a Apollo UFO type analysis to get all of the juicy goodies from it.
Maybe the video of that alien spacecraft is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2eIcSs … =emb_title

Tmcom · 2020-02-25 20:26:38

jorgear wrote:

Tmcom wrote:
Been seeing this video just released by NASA, (well it has been pulled by NASA on TY, or maybe it wasn't posted) but either way l can only find this dodgy YT video and not one from Youtube.
https://www.express.co.uk/videos/613494 … ce-station
So if anyone finds the original please post the link here, so l can take screen images and we can all get a close look at what is very likely a legit, alien craft, (space junk doesn't fly up away from the earth by itself eventhough dimwits say so).
Or it is a lot harder to do with this video, that won't allow a part Laptop view instead of full screen only.
I will post it in the correct section and put a link in here, unless there is little to see then l may put it here, but l suspect that we will see a lot, and l will need to post a Apollo UFO type analysis to get all of the juicy goodies from it.
Maybe the video of that alien spacecraft is here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2eIcSs … =emb_title

Thanks Jorgear, already found it, l will run an analysis when possible, but so far l am leaning towards it being a test run of something NASA is messing with, since it departs earth slowly.

So probably not as good as the legit UFO Apollo footage, but still worth looking into.

Tmcom · 2020-02-26 03:24:51

Just a satellite, unfortunately, which explains the light haze or firing of the boosters, and its slow departure.

So false alarm.

louis · 2020-02-26 17:33:02

Just a satellite that's going exactly the same speed as the ISS? Just a satellite that, from what you say, must be an operational satellite and its operators have put it so close to the ISS? Just a satellite that has a powerful booster like that?

Is this your own theory or do you have something to back this up?

Tmcom wrote:

Just a satellite, unfortunately, which explains the light haze or firing of the boosters, and its slow departure.
https://i.imgur.com/aRkZoGx.jpg
So false alarm.

Tmcom · 2020-02-26 21:26:11

louis wrote:

Just a satellite that's going exactly the same speed as the ISS? Just a satellite that, from what you say, must be an operational satellite and its operators have put it so close to the ISS? Just a satellite that has a powerful booster like that?
Is this your own theory or do you have something to back this up?

Tmcom wrote:
Just a satellite, unfortunately, which explains the light haze or firing of the boosters, and its slow departure.
https://i.imgur.com/aRkZoGx.jpg
So false alarm.

NASA is allowing this, being one, unlikely that they would, and it would be at the ISS speed since it was launched by them. Watch the video and you will see the faint light of its booster rockets, as well as the unmistakable shape of its main booster, and payload.

Sorry Louis, l am not going to say that this is a UFO, when it isn't, the one that followed the apollo astranauts in 1969 onwards is legit, and NASA, and Buzz's explanation is laughable, but the herd will buy it.

louis · 2020-02-27 15:54:24

So that sounds like this is your own theory not backed up by anyone or any evidence since I would presume you could give a link.

A launch from the ISS would account for the similar speed...do they do satellite launches from the ISS? That would be my first question...it's not an obvious place to do satellite launches. And if you did fire such powerful booster rockets on a satellite I would expect that would take place at a much further and therefore safer distance from the ISS.

Tmcom wrote:

louis wrote:
Just a satellite that's going exactly the same speed as the ISS? Just a satellite that, from what you say, must be an operational satellite and its operators have put it so close to the ISS? Just a satellite that has a powerful booster like that?
Is this your own theory or do you have something to back this up?

Tmcom wrote:
Just a satellite, unfortunately, which explains the light haze or firing of the boosters, and its slow departure.
https://i.imgur.com/aRkZoGx.jpg
So false alarm.
NASA is allowing this, being one, unlikely that they would, and it would be at the ISS speed since it was launched by them. Watch the video and you will see the faint light of its booster rockets, as well as the unmistakable shape of its main booster, and payload.
Sorry Louis, l am not going to say that this is a UFO, when it isn't, the one that followed the apollo astranauts in 1969 onwards is legit, and NASA, and Buzz's explanation is laughable, but the herd will buy it.

Tmcom · 2020-02-29 20:20:51

louis wrote:

So that sounds like this is your own theory not backed up by anyone or any evidence since I would presume you could give a link.
A launch from the ISS would account for the similar speed...do they do satellite launches from the ISS? That would be my first question...it's not an obvious place to do satellite launches. And if you did fire such powerful booster rockets on a satellite I would expect that would take place at a much further and therefore safer distance from the ISS.
Tmcom wrote:
louis wrote:
Just a satellite that's going exactly the same speed as the ISS? Just a satellite that, from what you say, must be an operational satellite and its operators have put it so close to the ISS? Just a satellite that has a powerful booster like that?
Is this your own theory or do you have something to back this up?
NASA is allowing this, being one, unlikely that they would, and it would be at the ISS speed since it was launched by them. Watch the video and you will see the faint light of its booster rockets, as well as the unmistakable shape of its main booster, and payload.
Sorry Louis, l am not going to say that this is a UFO, when it isn't, the one that followed the apollo astranauts in 1969 onwards is legit, and NASA, and Buzz's explanation is laughable, but the herd will buy it.

https://www.wired.com/2017/04/watch-nas … lites-iss/

Tmcom · 2020-03-02 03:13:43

Not much today, (been looking but not much to find) but there is this.

Wet ground and a distant possible raincloud.

Last edited by Tmcom (2020-10-23 22:00:47)

SpaceNut · 2020-03-02 17:28:08

The image shows the compressed rover tracks that indicate moisture...

Tmcom · 2020-03-03 04:16:04

SpaceNut wrote:

The image shows the compressed rover tracks that indicate moisture...

True, and here are a few more to confirm an overcast day on Mars.

Left the rover throwing up some dust, (it may even be in a dust devil), right the rovers shaccis being reflected back, but it is the overcast sky behind it that has my attention.

This one left, good signs of recent water runoff, and right probably the rover being reflected back in a large pebble.

This one no idea? The area is wet, so possibly some small rodent was sitting there and did a runner when the rover got too close.

louis · 2020-03-03 18:14:04

Latest from Art Alien TV...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjrx-f1piZU

Gun emplacement...or ventrifact?

You decide!

Certainly an interesting find. If this is a ventrifact, one has to say there are many ventrifacts on Mars that look like nothing on Earth. That might be due to the lower G, allowing rock formations to extend out over the surface without suffering structural weakness.

On the other hand, it could be a gun emplacement that is thousands or millions of years old.

jorgear · 2020-03-04 04:04:55

louis wrote:

Latest from Art Alien TV...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mjrx-f1piZU
Gun emplacement...or ventrifact?
You decide!
Certainly an interesting find. If this is a ventrifact, one has to say there are many ventrifacts on Mars that look like nothing on Earth. That might be due to the lower G, allowing rock formations to extend out over the surface without suffering structural weakness.
On the other hand, it could be a gun emplacement that is thousands or millions of years old.

It is too risky to speak of guns or tanks. But domes are the most real.

Of course that there was a war on Mars https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/91 … -war-bible

but those artifacts may be part or that war or not. Remember that all of that happened almost a million years ago.

jorgear · 2020-03-05 03:49:37

Great photo with great resolution of Mars... but do you remember when NASA faked the photos and colored the sky and land with red color so we cannot see the great life conditions and the remains on the surface of that tremendous battle?

FluxBB bbcode test

jorgear · 2020-03-05 16:27:58

PERSEVERANCE, the new name of the new rover that NASA will launch this year https://www.cnet.com/news/nasas-mars-20 … 05-10aaa0j

Tmcom · 2020-03-05 20:51:01

jorgear wrote:

PERSEVERANCE, the new name of the new rover that NASA will launch this year https://www.cnet.com/news/nasas-mars-20 … 05-10aaa0j

Perseverance, lol, l thought that Conspirance would be better.

But it will have a drone, with decent resolution for a change, so that is one improvement.

I will probably post a few drone ones here, but have an odd thousand sols left with the current one, so unless a gray throws the rover over a cliff l can't do those.

jorgear · 2020-03-06 03:24:09

PERSEVERANCE in looking for ancient life on Mars... the same intelligent life in the shape of buildings, statues, cities, face on Mars... that they found in the 1970s, or even before. What a big LIE, NASA

Tmcom · 2020-03-06 09:34:47

jorgear wrote:

PERSEVERANCE in looking for ancient life on Mars... the same intelligent life in the shape of buildings, statues, cities, face on Mars... that they found in the 1970s, or even before. What a big LIE, NASA

Agreed, a smokescreen for the herd that don't want to be spooked, and a trickle of reality for the rest of us.

If the deniers are so sure that Mars is a dead rock, then why does Viking approaching Mars show no atmosphere and Hubble in Earth orbit does?

Mars the only planet in our system with a disappearing atmosphere!!!

Mars has been habitable for some time, but with terrible sci fi flicks, and HG Wells, it sounds crazy, but as shown above, and here, there is solid evidence on our side.

louis · 2020-03-06 12:16:01

A drone? A flying drone? How does that work?

Tmcom wrote:

jorgear wrote:
PERSEVERANCE, the new name of the new rover that NASA will launch this year https://www.cnet.com/news/nasas-mars-20 … 05-10aaa0j
Perseverance, lol, l thought that Conspirance would be better.
But it will have a drone, with decent resolution for a change, so that is one improvement.
I will probably post a few drone ones here, but have an odd thousand sols left with the current one, so unless a gray throws the rover over a cliff l can't do those.

louis · 2020-03-06 12:17:53

It makes no sense to suddenly abandon the orange filter! And I don't think that orange filter has ever been adequately explained, anymore than why they often put out photos with grid lines all over them...what's the purpose of that?

jorgear wrote:

Great photo with great resolution of Mars... but do you remember when NASA faked the photos and colored the sky and land with red color so we cannot see the great life conditions and the remains on the surface of that tremendous battle?

https://www.lavanguardia.com/r/GODO/LV/ … ia-Web.jpg
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/imag … SKDCgzsaWf

SpaceNut · 2020-03-06 18:15:22

Sort of hard to have a planet wide dust storm without an atmosphere...orange, red or any other color....
Mars is close to life capable conditions but its going to be tiny now in its current state....

Tmcom · 2020-03-06 19:52:25

louis wrote:

A drone? A flying drone? How does that work?
Tmcom wrote:
jorgear wrote:
PERSEVERANCE, the new name of the new rover that NASA will launch this year https://www.cnet.com/news/nasas-mars-20 … 05-10aaa0j
Perseverance, lol, l thought that Conspirance would be better.
But it will have a drone, with decent resolution for a change, so that is one improvement.
I will probably post a few drone ones here, but have an odd thousand sols left with the current one, so unless a gray throws the rover over a cliff l can't do those.

It sits on top and takes off for a short while every few mouths, or when they are in an area devoid of plants.

It is only going to be airborne for l think 5 minutes at a time, since the secret one will take 20 minutes to make sure nothing that spooks the herd is in sight, before giving us the media version.

But a half decent reflective rock will reveal all.

Tmcom · 2020-03-06 20:01:47

SpaceNut wrote:

Sort of hard to have a planet wide dust storm without an atmosphere...orange, red or any other color....
Mars is close to life capable conditions but its going to be tiny now in its current state....

I wouldn't say tiny, but small compared to Earth.

Some areas have rainforests, forests and giant lakes or oceans, but as we have seen most of the planet is dry, with only bushes and prickles dominating the landscape.

I have downloaded a panorama, and will be posting it here when l can. Or this one.

https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/jpeg/PIA16919.jpg

This is the raw image, but you can google it for a NASA 360 walkabout version.

Tmcom · 2020-03-07 02:58:11

Ok, a few juicy things here.

First off the rover has some mud on its wheel, or the ground is damp, (third image down shows the wheel impressions).

Next these impact marks on the rover, and considering that they are pretty deep, could have been a micro meteorite impact, that or a nasty dust devil?

Last image what looks like some water or a puddle, hard to be sure, since the landscape is reflected below it, but a good chance.

Second last is my favorite or the rover drove over something green, (CP makes that obvious) or best guess it was some moss on a few stones and the over one ton rover drove over it a few times, trying to mash up the evidence, but the color is still there if the BS orange/red filter is removed.

This panorama is from 2013, and l am pretty sure that l missed it, but some green moss and recent rainfall, made it worthwhile.

New Mars Forums

Announcement

#1201 2020-02-25 06:59:44

Re: The Real Mars

#1202 2020-02-25 10:01:00

Re: The Real Mars

#1203 2020-02-25 16:31:28

Re: The Real Mars

#1204 2020-02-25 20:26:38

Re: The Real Mars

#1205 2020-02-26 03:24:51

Re: The Real Mars

#1206 2020-02-26 17:33:02

Re: The Real Mars

#1207 2020-02-26 21:26:11

Re: The Real Mars

#1208 2020-02-27 15:54:24

Re: The Real Mars

#1209 2020-02-29 20:20:51

Re: The Real Mars

#1210 2020-03-02 03:13:43

Re: The Real Mars

#1211 2020-03-02 17:28:08

Re: The Real Mars

#1212 2020-03-03 04:16:04

Re: The Real Mars

#1213 2020-03-03 18:14:04

Re: The Real Mars

#1214 2020-03-04 04:04:55

Re: The Real Mars

#1215 2020-03-05 03:49:37

Re: The Real Mars

#1216 2020-03-05 16:27:58

Re: The Real Mars

#1217 2020-03-05 20:51:01

Re: The Real Mars

#1218 2020-03-06 03:24:09

Re: The Real Mars

#1219 2020-03-06 09:34:47

Re: The Real Mars

#1220 2020-03-06 12:16:01

Re: The Real Mars

#1221 2020-03-06 12:17:53

Re: The Real Mars

#1222 2020-03-06 18:15:22

Re: The Real Mars

#1223 2020-03-06 19:52:25

Re: The Real Mars

#1224 2020-03-06 20:01:47

Re: The Real Mars

#1225 2020-03-07 02:58:11

Re: The Real Mars

Board footer