You are not logged in.
In order to prepare the propellant to come home in 24 months, that means 1.178t of LOX production per day for two years since BFS requires 860t of LOX. That's just over 49.08kg per hour. That means MOXIE needs 294.5kWe to produce enough LOX to fill BFS's LOX tank, assuming zero losses, which would never happen in real life. That's a lot of power just to get the O2. That doesn't include the power to run the Sabatier reactor or the cryocooler to keep the propellant cold. The people at SpaceX and NASA certainly have their work cut out for themselves.
I recall reading somewhere that we've been researching using vacuum ultraviolet lasers to drastically reduce the amount of power required to split CO2 and produce C and O2, rather than CO and O, but I've no clue how that effort is going.
Online
Josh,
Some of the newer GaAs-diode lasers have achieved greater than 75%+ electrical-to-optical efficiency. A very interesting new fiber-based high-power laser that Lockheed-Martin is working on is in excess of that, but optical-to-optical efficiency limits electrical-to-optical efficiency to between 25% and 35%. The best commercial diodes that you can buy are only have an electrical-to-optical efficiency of 50%. Alas, UV lasers are some of the worst when it comes to efficiency, although the new solid state models could help change that and reduce the requirement to continually replace the gas every couple weeks or so.
In this application we definitely need beam shaping, which further hurts our efficiency. We'll need an UV transparent quartz tube to lase through. Gas pressure will push the Carbon residue through the tube, so an electrostatic Carbon separator downstream of the laser aperture is required, else the CO2 and O2 will be contaminated with Carbon fouling. We also need a method to separate the CO2 from the O2 to recirculate the CO2 back through the system until we have acceptably pure O2. That means we also need a molecular sieve.
It looks interesting to me.
Online
From page 5 with design notes continuing to make a means to move and to haul cargo as needed but to know how to fix what breaks is a key element to being able to sustain man while he is there.
https://ecomodder.com/wiki/Open_ReVolt
We can make motors insitu, batteries but when it comes to controllers and devices to send the power from the battey in measured amounts to produce movement makes for either learning how to recycle the parts for the cargo ship or learning how to build lower tech controllers.
Relays and switches are low tech....
https://www.brighthubengineering.com/di … r-circuit/
https://makezine.com/2018/03/19/control … ic-relays/
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2010/627836/
https://www.engineersgarage.com/contrib … ay-at-home
https://www.anaheimautomation.com/manua … -guide.php
http://ddmotorsystems.com/ElectricVehicles.php
https://www.electricmotorsport.com/e-bikes
Offline
It takes a lot less energy to split the first O from CO2, making CO, than to split the second O to make Carbon. In addition the resulting C will be deposited all over your equipment and catalysts. Also heat recovery from a CO stream is a lot easier than trying to cool the solid carbon. On the downside, CO is not so easy to separate from your O2 product.
Offline
On the downside, CO is not so easy to separate from your O2 product.
Direct CO2 electrolysis is done across a thin ceramic wall. With high temperature (900°C+) and electric potential. O2 passes through, CO and CO2 do not. Inside the tube starts with pure CO2, ends with 80% CO, 20% CO2 by volume. Outside the tube is pure O2. That's was the Mars ISPP Precursor ("MIP") on Mars Surveyor 2001 Lander mission. MOXIE on Mars 2020:
MOXIE collects CO2 from the Martian atmosphere, then electrochemically splits the CO2 molecules into O2 and CO. A solid oxide electrolysis cell works on the principle that, at elevated temperatures, certain ceramic oxides, such as yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) and doped ceria, become oxide ion (O2–) conductors. A thin nonporous disk of YSZ (solid electrolyte) is sandwiched between two porous electrodes. For oxygen generation from carbon dioxide, CO2 diffuses through the porous electrode (cathode) and reaches the vicinity of the electrode-electrolyte boundary. Through a combination of thermal dissociation and electrocatalysis, an oxygen atom is liberated from the CO2 molecule and picks up two electrons from the cathode to become an oxide ion (O2–). Via oxygen ion vacancies in the crystal lattice of the electrolyte, the oxygen ion is transported to the electrolyte-anode interface due to the applied DC potential. At this interface the oxygen ion transfers its charge to the anode, combines with another oxygen atom to form oxygen (O2), and diffuses out of the anode.
The net reaction is thus 2CO2 ⟶ 2CO + O2
Offline
That is a very energy hungry process, Robert. It might be more economic if you can find a use for the CO byproduct.
Offline
That is a very energy hungry process, Robert. It might be more economic if you can find a use for the CO byproduct.
It takes about 3 times as much energy vs water electrolysis to produce a certain mass of O2. On ISS, it would require power from solar panels. Obviously this wouldn't be primary oxygen generation, rather it would replenish recycling losses. You want to recycle wash water, and recover moisture from feces. All this to close the loop sufficient for a life support system for transit to Mars.
As for using CO, on the surface of Mars you can use CO to smelt iron. Or to make plastic: 2 CO + 4 H2 to make ethylene + water, or CO + Cl to make phosgene (an ingredient for polycarbonate), or 4 H2 + 8 CO over a catalyst to make butadiene and CO2 (first step for polybutadiene rubber), or ammonia + CO to make hydrogen cyanide + water (first step to make nylon). You obviously want to be very careful with phosgene (World War 1 poison gas) or hydrogen cyanide gas.
Offline
INTEGRATED MARS IN-SITU PROPELLANT PRODUCTION SYSTEM
3CO2 + 6H2 > CH4 + 2CO + 4H2O
Mars In Situ Resource Utilization and the Importance of Water Resources
http://www.geoffreylandis.com/propellant.html
Sabatier reaction (which requires hydrogen as well as carbon dioxide):
4H2 + CO2 --> CH4 + 2H2O
electrolyzing CO2 into carbon monoxide (CO) and Oxygen, using a zirconia electrolysis 2 CO2 --> 2CO + O2
MARS IN SITU PROPELLANT PRODUCTION UTILIZING THE REVERSE WATER GAS SHIFT
Of course we could make a hybrid solid booster on mars as well.
BREAKTHROUGH CONCEPTS FOR MARS EXPLORATION WITH IN-SITU PROPELLANTS
Hybrid Rocket Propulsion and In-Situ Propellant Production for Future Mars Missions
Offline
I'm thinking of early days on Mars, not of the time when we have large settlements and industrial activity. CO/LOX could be used as vehicle fuel for hoppers and rovers and as an emergency fuel store for thermal electric generators, I suppose. But methane or methanol would be much better for these purposes. Hydrogen is the key so we must find useable water.
Offline
An important part to power is saving it and converting it back out for use. The trick is to match the abilities for each to the batteries that are used.
https://www.brighthubengineering.com/di … -inverter/
Of course a cart needs a strong motor
https://www.goldenmotor.com/frame-bldcmotor.htm
matching all of this with the controller
http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/9563/InT … ollers.pdf
Offline
I see that we talked about battery to supply power and one key lelement is what we consider a dead battery versus a fully charged ready to use for the number ampere hour ratings that the battery can suppy for a 12v battery (lead scid or alykeline) that dead voltage is roughly 9 volts and if your item requires constant current the battery will have gotten quite hot by that point causing it to become degraded once recharged.
Each battery chemistry will have different cell dead or what is considered a voltage to low to operate with.
Offline
Offline
This tool is an important item to bring, make and use on mars in a number of forms manual human powered to battery and nuclear options of powering its use for a base construction.
Offline
Harvesting the sun's energy for clean drinking water: Where we are, where we need to be
When we talk water on mars its going to uddy brine mixture at best until filtered and processed to make it more useable for fuel making and for water to supplement drinking water that will not be enough towards the end of the mission and when we add in the greenhouse for food we are still adding mass that we can not bring with us to use on mars.
Offline
For SpaceNut re #165
Thanks for providing the link to this research on harvesting water molecules from brine.
This post (with link) could probably fit well in other topics. It doesn't seem (as I read it) to tell us much about designing a cart for use on Mars.
However, since it is here, I'd like to show the description of the Japanese institute that funded the research into multi-layer evaporation technology, and a short description of the work of the lead professor:
Title of original paper: Strategies for breaking theoretical evaporation limitation in direct solar steam generation
Journal: Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2020.110842
About Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT), Japan
Shibaura Institute of Technology (SIT) is a private university with campuses in Tokyo and Saitama. Since the establishment of its predecessor, Tokyo Higher School of Industry and Commerce, in 1927, it has maintained "learning through practice" as its philosophy in the education of engineers. SIT was the only private science and engineering university selected for the Top Global University Project sponsored by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and will receive support from the ministry for 10 years starting from the 2014 academic year. Its motto, "Nurturing engineers who learn from society and contribute to society," reflects its mission of fostering scientists and engineers who can contribute to the sustainable growth of the world by exposing their over 8,000 students to culturally diverse environments, where they learn to cope, collaborate, and relate with fellow students from around the world.
Website: https://www.shibaura-it.ac.jp/en/
About Professor Lei Miao from SIT, Japan
Dr. Lei Miao is a professor in the Department of Material Science and Engineering at Shibaura Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan. Her main research areas include synthesis of novel high-efficiency thermoelectric materials, preparation of solar photothermal conversion material, direct solar steam generation systems, and energy saving and harvesting materials. She is the recipient of several awards, including the science and technology award, a distinguished achievement for collaboration regarding ceramics between Japan and China. She has published over 200 papers and 6 books, and has authorized 35 patents.
As I understand the research, careful selection of materials of differing porosity laid over a pond of water with suspended matter can result in reduced loss of energy to the underlying pond mass, where it is lost, while increasing the effectiveness of the evaporation process.
One specific technique that caught my eye was use of the capillary action (a technique shown by plants on Earth) to pull water molecules out of the brine and into the intermediate region, where solar heating allowed for thermal stimulation to the point of escape via the pores in the top layer of covering material.
This technique seems applicable to any pond anywhere on Earth.
I would expect to see this product or something like it on the market soon, since the global need for potable water is so great.
On Mars, the only available liquid water will be brine, so this method of drawing the water molecules out of the source material would seem to be simple to deploy and to use. Simple light reflectors could improve performance of a water evaporation system such as this.
If someone can study the article, or perhaps the underlying papers, I'd be interested to know how the liberated water molecules are harvested.
(th)
Offline
The topic wondered over the course of posts to more than a building of a pull behind cart to being an co2 absorption rack carrier to other activity. The other was for absorbing water so as to be able to get it out of the atmosphere.
hats interesting for a possible mars application on the void ponds...
Offline