Debug: Database connection successful
You are not logged in.
We have known for some time that when we go to mars that we will need to be able to lesson the connection back to earth for lots of things and fuels for return flights are just one of those items.
Carbon Hydrogen with Oxygen seem to be the main ingredients for these.
CH = Carbyne
CH2 = CarBene
C6H5CH3 or C7H8 = Toluene
CH4 = Methane
ect...
What are the others; that we can make once we have the means to make them on mars....
Corrected Toluene
Last edited by SpaceNut (2017-08-28 16:32:23)
Offline
Like button can go here
Space Nut, you seem to be asking "what are all the organic compounds we can make on Mars?" The answer is millions. Of the 4 compounds you have listed, only CH4 is stable by itself. The others are fragments of molecules. Other stable compounds are C2H6, C3H8, C4H10, C5H12, C6H14, C7H16, C8H18, etc. You can also get C6H6 (benzene), which is a ring. Then there are the alcohols: CH3OH, C2H5OH, C3H7OH, etc. These are methanol, ethanol, and propanol. The sky's the limit.
Offline
Like button can go here
Toluene is C7H8, and is a cyclic aromatic compound, not C3. C3H8 is propane.
Offline
Like button can go here
Did another look and I got C6H5CH3 or C7H8 but in response to RobS I was looking to open up other possibilities as well and not just the ones to which I meantioned as the starting point as man will need lots of others over time to be made.
Such as hydrogel's.
Offline
Like button can go here
I originally posted this to the first Mars Society forum in 1999, before New Mars. I created a local chapter website in 2001, and created a page. I added a little to it, specifically Melamine. But it's mostly what I posted in 1999. Chemical reactions to create them are either briefly shown, or in linked web pages.
Plastics
Some chemicals:
hydrogen - H2
carbon monoxide - CO
methane - CH4
ethylene - C2H4
benzene - C6H6
toluene - C7H8
naphthalene - C10H8
phenol - C6H5OH
ethylene glycol, aka glycol - (CH2OH)2
acetone - (CH3)2CO
cumene - C9H12
terebinth, aka oil of turpentine or spirits of turpentine - C10H16
Plastics:
polyethylene (PE, LDPE, HDPE)
polypropylene (PP)
acrylic
Lexan, aka polycarbonate (PC)
polyvinyl chloride (PVC)
polystyrene (PS)
Mylar, aka polyethylene terephthalate (PET)
polybutadiene rubber (BR)
acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)
phenolformaldehyde, aka phenolic
Nylon
melamine resin
Offline
Like button can go here
If you want fuel, the obvious one to me is trisilane: Si3H8. It's liquid between -117°C and +53°C, so liquid at any temperature on the surface of Mars. It burns in a CO2 atmosphere. Autoignition temperature is 50°C, which means in an oxygen atmosphere it will spontaneously ignite. Anything with an autoignition temperature below 55°C is called pyrophoric. The slightest spark will ignite it, so it's dangerous in an oxygen atmosphere. Some people here may be familiar with silane, aka monosilane. It's autoignition temperature is -18°C, so it spontaneously ignites upon contact with air at any temperature at KSC. It was used to ignite Shuttle's main engines. Trisilane is a bit safer to handle.
Offline
Like button can go here
What I noticed was the table at the bottom of the trisilane line with Binary compounds of hydrogen which would be important as building chemistry blocks along the way to making what we need on mars sooner rather than later.
Offline
Like button can go here
The easiest propellant to get on Mars is LCO/LOX. There is no need to dig up ice, purify it and electrolyse it. Unlike LH2 these are only moderately cryogenic so fairly easy to store on Mars. Trouble is they don't give a very high Isp but they would be probably be OK for a hopper or to operate a gas turbine for power generation or traction.
Musk proposes to make Methane. It is perfectly feasible to do so, just more complicated. However Mars methane will contain some 20% deuterons in place of Hydrogen protons giving a molecular weight of about 21 instead of the MW of 20 of earth methane. This is a 5% increase in mass of fuel in any rocket using it. Also the MW of the exhaust products will be slightly increased, so reducing the achievable Isp. Musk will have to increase his margins a little to cover for these factors.
Offline
Like button can go here
http://marsforthemany.com/news/technolo … et-engine/
Note: other hydrocarbon-based fuels can also be manufactured on Mars, but they all have lower ISPs than methane, so a methane rocket engine is typically the engine most discussed. Here's a quick chart if you are interested.
Offline
Like button can go here
Offline
Like button can go here
Elderflower,
Seems like a good combo to me if we're using pump-fed engines. All we need is Martian atmosphere and electrical power. At 3,000psi, LOX/LCO specific impulse is basically equivalent to LOX/LCH4 sea-level performance.
Carbon Monoxide and Oxygen Combustion Experiments: A Demonstration of Mars In Situ Propellants
This study seems to indicate that we'd require 27% less electrical power, too. At some point, the total mass and complexity of all systems required to make this a reality should be considered. LOX/LCO is low-risk compared to the non-existent LCH4 plant and ice mining equipment we'd need to make a LCH4-fueled rocket / lander work. The Isp increase is nice, but not if it means that we just negate all of that with increased infrastructure mass required to provide the infrastructure to produce propellant. LOX and LCO can be made using existing technology, so R&D costs would also be lower. In the future, we could always switch to LOX/LCH4 after we find the ice, determine how to mine it, and how to build a LCH4 plant that works on Mars.
I think the Rutherford engine tech from Electron Labs that sucks the tanks dry and using battery-powered electrical turbo pumps is worth a look. There are no propellant residuals to prevent the turbo pumps from exploding, unlike gas generators or staged combustion, and electrical control over the pumps for deep throttling. Just like staged combustion, all the propellant goes through the combustion chamber after it's been used to regeneratively cool the combustion chamber. The engines are so small and light that they're human-portable on Earth.
Offline
Like button can go here
I noticed its using a regular engine and simple hydrogen oxygen for ignition starting which also mean hydrogel fuels would work as well.
It also seems to be throtte able as well. As you noted requiring less power makes it ideal for a starting point as we have free life support from it from the same equipment for oxygen for crew.
Offline
Like button can go here
SpaceNut,
We'd use something like the specialized spark plugs that the RS-25 uses to assure ignition. You also need batteries to provide cryocooler and vacuum pump power to split the CO2 into CO and O2. I was thinking EUV lasers. At the right power level and pulse width, they produce CO or O2 from CO2 in a single pulse. It's a single-pass system. A molecular sieve would filter gas and a Dyson-style system would provide "the proper amount of suction" and spin the dust out of the vacuum pump intake.
We'd land, deploy a solar array to start making propellant, and use the giant battery to keep the propellant cold at night. We're going to do this several times per mission in order to visit enough sites to find a suitable base location. The good thing is that all we need is clean CO2. If we find any water in the regolith, we only extract enough for drinking and hygiene.
Offline
Like button can go here
We are going to need to under stand mars as Martian Dust Could Help Explain Water Loss, Plus Other Learnings From Global Storm
That lack of ground moisture and the light mass dust was a key to the solar powered rovers not surviving a global reaching storm.
Offline
Like button can go here
The much needed ability for reuseable landers and rockets for moon or mars and a critical part for orbiting depots....
Its the methods which still are being tweeked in sabitier, RGWS and others
Offline
Like button can go here
https://notrickszone.com/2019/12/02/sci … he-planet/
Earth’s atmosphere contains 400 ppm CO2 (0.04%). Mars has a 950,000 ppm (95%) CO2 atmosphere.
lowest point of Hellas Planitia it can get as high as 1,155 pascals (0.1675 psi).
https://www.hydrofarm.com/resources/art … enrichment
Carbon dioxide is an odorless gas and a minor constituent of the air we breathe. It comprises only .03 % (300 parts per million, or PPM) of the atmosphere but is vitally important to all life on this planet!
1,000ppm of CO2 means that if you could count a million gas molecules, 1,000 of them would be of carbon dioxide and 999,000 molecules would be some other gases.
https://www.co2meter.com/blogs/news/151 … on-defined
http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/cro … 00-077.htm
https://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov/pns/convert.html
https://principia-scientific.org/human- … r-million/
co2 Amount with a volume
https://www.hydroponics.net/learn/co2_calculator.php
Offline
Like button can go here
poke how soon I forget that I have a topic for that...
The scale of the stacks in Moxie such that four SOXE stack units will exceed the 2.3 kg/hr oxygen production rate requirement to produce 30 tons of propellant in the 435 day Mars landing to Earth launch, Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) propellant production window.
Making Rocket Propellant on Mars
Maybe a use for our inflatable tank rocket
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/robomars/pdf/6098.pdf
Offline
Like button can go here
On that note the quantity for manned return flight with home made fuels on mars.
The agency estimates the dust-to-thrust system would need to produce seven metric tons of liquid methane and about 22 metric tons of liquid oxygen in 16 months to be viable. Scientists still need to identify the best landing areas and refine the machinery to know if it’s possible to hit those goals with current technology, but ISRU is where NASA’s Mars exploration is moving.
Offline
Like button can go here
As noted we can make kerosene on mars ands well as methanol...
http://www.methanol.org/wp-content/uplo … evised.pdf
Offline
Like button can go here
Offline
Like button can go here
For SpaceNut .... I just noticed this topic in the Sticky batch in Human Missions ...
It seems (to me at least) as though your new regolith harvesting topic is covering some of the same ideas.
(th)
Offline
Like button can go here
Not really as the focus here was to get other things that we need once we are there and to ask what other types could we use not oxygen and methane from the main insitu ingredients.
Offline
Like button can go here
On the topic of LCO/LO2 propellant combination. If you add a few % hydrogen to the mix, you will boost flame speed and improve ignitability. The reason: hydrogen is such a small molecule. It has high molecular speed and will preheat the mixture and create turbulence ahead of the flame front, accelerating it. I don't know if it would be desirable to store the H2 and CO mixed in the same tank. The H2 and CO have different liquefaction temperatures, different density and may reacte with each other. As H2 is only a minor proportion of total propellant, it could be stored separately.
Last edited by Calliban (2021-11-25 09:56:01)
"Plan and prepare for every possibility, and you will never act. It is nobler to have courage as we stumble into half the things we fear than to analyse every possible obstacle and begin nothing. Great things are achieved by embracing great dangers."
Offline
Like button can go here
Oxygen can be generated by electrolysis of water. It takes 13-20MJ of electricity to produce 1kg of O2 from water. It turns out that for briny solutions containing perchlorate compounds, only 4% as much energy is needed. Mars soil is full of perchlorates.
https://theconversation.com/mars-colony … rch-151053
"Plan and prepare for every possibility, and you will never act. It is nobler to have courage as we stumble into half the things we fear than to analyse every possible obstacle and begin nothing. Great things are achieved by embracing great dangers."
Offline
Like button can go here
For Calliban re #24
Thanks for this interesting report!
The link appears well worth following, to try to understand how the energy cost of liberating oxygen from perchlorates is so much less!
It would seem likely that Chlorine is produced.
I wonder if water is consumed, or if it remains for service as a catalyst.
Hopefully there will be a follow up post in this topic soon.
(th)
Offline
Like button can go here