You are not logged in.
Harmony and Destiny mated successfully http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21787565/
Great job with the last image cyclops. 8)
Interesting news about new way to store hydrogen:
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=102776#102776
Check the posted link there.
Interesting news about new way to store hydrogen:
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=102776#102776
Check the posted link there.
Interesting news about new way to store hydrogen:
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=102776#102776
Check the posted link there.
Interesting news about new way to store hydrogen:
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=102776#102776
Check the posted link there.
Add THIS to your calculations:
http://www.energy-daily.com/reports/New … d_999.html
There's talk of a new method of storing hydrogen, and it sounds like it'd have great implications for space flight.
Of the two scramjets are the most likely to be developed first. However a space elevator would really, really open things up to the public since it would bypass the limiting fuel demands needed to reach orbit.
For timelines I'd give scramjets perhaps 20 years to be fully useable, and for space elevators...maybe 50 years earliest 100 years more likely.
Heh, makes me think 'flying saucer'
Great to see more Orion hardware coming to reality.
Now that's captivating imagery. 8) Kudos to Japan!
The cams are back!
http://www.space.com/news/071109-marssc … nding.html
NASA announced in September that it was scaling back some of Mars Science Laboratory's capabilities in order to keep the $1.7 billion rover mission on track.
Seeking to avoid writing another $75 million check for the already over-budget mission, NASA scuttled a descent camera designed to capture color video of the approaching martian surface and refused to provide any money beyond 2007 for Chem-Cam, a laser instrument that has exceeded its budget by 70 percent.
But Alan Stern, NASA's associate administrator for science, told Space News that the Chem-Cam and the Mars Descent Imager (MARDI) programs have since found solutions to their budget quandaries and were back on the manifest.
Nothing about this yet on NASA.gov but this is awesome news.
IIRC... NASA has claimed months ago to adopt ONLY the METRIC system... so, why do we STILL see "lbs.", "ft", "nmi", etc. in its documents?
This might actually be a good point in light of the infamous dual-crap-up of the Mars '98 probes.
Trick was it was Lockheed and the aerospace industry at fault, not NASA or the designers. Likely the past embarrassment has NASA being more strict on them.
More from your 'other' Ares-1 post gaetanomarano:
there are NO advantages but ONLY giant costs and longer timeline to fly
as explained in my "Super SLV" article, NASA can use three standard SRB (to, also, cover the 13 mT lack of payload of the current AresV design).
...and 3 standard SRBs are heavier than 2 5-segments. AND if it's timelines you're worried about, it'll take ALOT longer to redesign fuel tanks to handle 3 segments including aerodynamic studies, wind tunnels.
I think for my taxpayer dollars I'd want the Ares V rather than settling for a mutant shuttle-C.
Oh great, more anti-Constellation raving.
Although I'm sure you crunch numbers well gaetanomarano and can draw/tweak a few jpeg images it sounds more like a publicity stunt for your site.
I think I'll trust Cyclops' comments as well as actual press releases.
Sorry to attack but I just get annoyed hearing space enthusiasts talk like they are in charge of NASA; unless you have an engineering degree and a job within the space industries all most enthusiasts can do is rant on the sides, or more productively write a few letters to congressmen or organizations like the Planetary Society.
Continue posting your ideas and opinions gaetanomarano, but for the love of Pete do it with a grain of salt - I consider Constellation as a blessing NASA's been overdue for. Was it better back in the lull of the STS aka Challenger days?
That and post your Ares stuff in the actual Ares I (or V) threads.
Damn this is a bad twist. Hopefully something can be done to patch it.
Sounds like a mixed choice of possibilities complicated by the rover's budget troubles :?
The craters sound like they have good possibilities, especially the one with the multiple channels. After that I'd consider Nili Fossae and Meridiani, the later since it's been proven to be reasonably safe, interesting, and the same region might have more variety than expected.
Orion itself seems to be on track, the new 607 design should be complete at the beginning of November.
Where's some info on the new design?
I'm not sure about this. Won't launching this station require plenty of launches to sustain, and until propellant production is established on the Moon everything still comes from Earth. All that'd be done is add an unessicary hitch in the plan.
Personally following the Mars Direct example is a better idea; i.e. send an unmanned lander that days there.
They have an impressive schedule laid out for sure, and it's great that they have the first scheduled test for next year. It's also promising that they're trying to narrow the manned flight gap as well.
It looks like a schedule that'd work, and perhaps if the initial tests run well they may skip ahead to the manned flights...safety allowing of course.
The limits are, in short:
A) Power Source - likely to be solar, which means the poles would be a no-no initially and don't hold your breath for nuclear reactors; lord knows dragging that much plutonium or uranium will raise a ruccus both nationally and internationally.
B) Safety - this'll depend on the capability of the manned lander. I imagine like unmanned landers we may have to avoid rough terrain like what's bound to exist on any of the volcanoes, canyons, and polar caps. As appealing Mariner Valley is...you typically don't wanna risk crashing into sheer cliffs.
However for suggestions I'd off-the-bat suggest any of the channels, namely Ares Vallis or Kasei Vallis. Possibly more appealing might be visiting Gusev Crater - Spirit has both scouted it and reveals it has chapters in Martian history to keep a base well-occupied.
LOI achieved...next up relay satellite deployment. So far so good for JAXA.
LOI should be happening soon - I hope well for this mission. Japan has had some rotten luck as far as probe missions have gone but I think they have great potential all the same.
Now that this baby's in orbit we ought to keep a close eye on it. :shock:
Almost harsh but nessicary to cap/cut this mission. I had a feeling this'd happen eventually since they were making this mission almost larger than life.
Regardless I think this mission, once it hits the dirt (provided the skycrane concepts proves itself well), will prove to be equally as intruiging as the MERs have.
I wonder what will follow after MSR, as far as landers are concerned. I assume once the Constellation program gets underway things will start shifting toward preludes to manned operations; i.e. larger landers prototyping manned ones with fuel production - that ought to be a mission flown within the next ten years and I bet that could be coupled with a sample return.
The delayed launch actually improves some things for Dawn:
1) Mars fly-by happens a month earlier. I don't suppose anyone knows yet if Dawn has a science campaign for Mars?
2) Vesta arrival happens a little sooner, which allows for more science that'd otherwise be limited at this major asteroid.
Figures cheaper cost wins out over all else...
I'm hoping Boeing won't be the Achille's heal of Ares I...and I say that in light of the ISS which Boeing is chiefly responsible for. However, in fairness, it's probably more the fault of international partners and poor NASA management that the ISS became such a white elephant.
Anything else left for Ares/Orion?
I'm sure JSC's full of nastalsia to add to that.
Hopefully the testing on the 5-segment SRBs will proceed smoothly - they're obviously going to be the first step toward the Ares V we'll see in the next few years.