You are not logged in.
Many thanks, Alt2War!
That was an interesting interview.
I don't know if what they say about President Bush being a religious nut is true, but I very much doubt he's quite as stupid as the media want us to believe. Even if you assign to him no more than a certain low cunning, that in itself is a form of intelligence, and it may be just the kind of intelligence we need right now as we face global terrorism.Thanks again, Alt. I never thought I'd see the day when you would draw attention to an article which tends to paint George Dubya in a favourable light. It just goes to show ... you never can tell .. !!
![]()
:laugh:
I think we took different things away from this article when reading it.
Alt2War, it seems to me that you are assuming, without real evidence, that Bush is the cause of the erosion of civil liberties. Don't focus to closely on one figure, there are plenty of people moving in from the other side. Keep the right flank covered, but reinforce the left.
Assuming what another assumes is dangerous
Many thanks, Alt2War!
That was an interesting interview.
I don't know if what they say about President Bush being a religious nut is true, but I very much doubt he's quite as stupid as the media want us to believe. Even if you assign to him no more than a certain low cunning, that in itself is a form of intelligence, and it may be just the kind of intelligence we need right now as we face global terrorism.Thanks again, Alt. I never thought I'd see the day when you would draw attention to an article which tends to paint George Dubya in a favourable light. It just goes to show ... you never can tell .. !!
![]()
:laugh:
I think we took different things away from this article when reading it.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/article … 5048.shtml
Gen. Franks Doubts Constitution Will Survive WMD Attack
John O. Edwards, NewsMax.com
Friday, Nov. 21, 2003
Gen. Tommy Franks says that if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government.
Franks, who successfully led the U.S. military operation to liberate Iraq, expressed his worries in an extensive interview he gave to the men?s lifestyle magazine Cigar Aficionado.
In the magazine?s December edition, the former commander of the military?s Central Command warned that if terrorists succeeded in using a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) against the U.S. or one of our allies, it would likely have catastrophic consequences for our cherished republican form of government.
Discussing the hypothetical dangers posed to the U.S. in the wake of Sept. 11, Franks said that ?the worst thing that could happen? is if terrorists acquire and then use a biological, chemical or nuclear weapon that inflicts heavy casualties.
If that happens, Franks said, ?... the Western world, the free world, loses what it cherishes most, and that is freedom and liberty we?ve seen for a couple of hundred years in this grand experiment that we call democracy.?
Franks then offered ?in a practical sense? what he thinks would happen in the aftermath of such an attack.
?It means the potential of a weapon of mass destruction and a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world ? it may be in the United States of America ? that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution. Two steps, very, very important.?
Franks didn?t speculate about how soon such an event might take place.
Already, critics of the U.S. Patriot Act, rushed through Congress in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks, have argued that the law aims to curtail civil liberties and sets a dangerous precedent.
But Franks? scenario goes much further. He is the first high-ranking official to openly speculate that the Constitution could be scrapped in favor of a military form of government.
The usually camera-shy Franks retired from U.S. Central Command, known in Pentagon lingo as CentCom, in August 2003, after serving nearly four decades in the Army.
Franks earned three Purple Hearts for combat wounds and three Bronze Stars for valor. Known as a ?soldier?s general,? Franks made his mark as a top commander during the U.S.?s successful Operation Desert Storm, which liberated Kuwait in 1991. He was in charge of CentCom when Osama bin Laden?s al-Qaeda attacked the United States on Sept. 11.
Franks said that within hours of the attacks, he was given orders to prepare to root out the Taliban in Afghanistan and to capture bin Laden.
Franks offered his assessment on a number of topics to Cigar Aficionado, including:
President Bush: ?As I look at President Bush, I think he will ultimately be judged as a man of extremely high character. A very thoughtful man, not having been appraised properly by those who would say he?s not very smart. I find the contrary. I think he?s very, very bright. And I suspect that he?ll be judged as a man who led this country through a crease in history effectively. Probably we?ll think of him in years to come as an American hero.?
On the motivation for the Iraq war: Contrary to claims that top Pentagon brass opposed the invasion of Iraq, Franks said he wholeheartedly agreed with the president?s decision to invade Iraq and oust Saddam Hussein.
?I, for one, begin with intent. ... There is no question that Saddam Hussein had intent to do harm to the Western alliance and to the United States of America. That intent is confirmed in a great many of his speeches, his commentary, the words that have come out of the Iraqi regime over the last dozen or so years. So we have intent.
?If we know for sure ... that a regime has intent to do harm to this country, and if we have something beyond a reasonable doubt that this particular regime may have the wherewithal with which to execute the intent, what are our actions and orders as leaders in this country??
The Pentagon?s deck of cards: Asked how the Pentagon decided to put its most-wanted Iraqis on a set of playing cards, Franks explained its genesis. He recalled that when his staff identified the most notorious Iraqis the U.S. wanted to capture, ?it just turned out that the number happened to be about the same as a deck of cards. And so somebody said, ?Aha, this will be the ace of spades.??
Capturing Saddam: Franks said he was not surprised that Saddam has not been captured or killed. But he says he will eventually be found, perhaps sooner than Osama bin laden.
?The capture or killing of Saddam Hussein will be a near term thing. And I won?t say that?ll be within 19 or 43 days. ... I believe it is inevitable.?
Franks ended his interview with a less-than-optimistic note. ?It?s not in the history of civilization for peace ever to reign. Never has in the history of man. ... I doubt that we?ll ever have a time when the world will actually be at peace.?
*Has anyone read _Snow Crash_ by Neal Stephenson? It's available at Amazon.com.
A former acquaintance of mine read it and loved it. I've read the reviews at Amazon.com; it received at least 4-star ratings from reviewers.
Apparently it's a "cyberpunk" near-futuristic novel. Looks interesting.
--Cindy
One of my Favorite writers.
It's a fast and easy read. Light stuff. Cyberpunk is an interesting style.
*Thanks for the "heads-up," Alt2War. I've looked for _Snow Crash_ at a few used book stores (don't want to buy it new, considering I haven't read cyberpunk stuff before), but no luck so far. The title sticks in my mind, though, so I'll have to look it up in a new bookstore sooner or later.
A few days ago I picked up:
_Meditations_ by Marcus Aurelius. Profound! I'd been recommended this book quite some time ago; I wish I'd picked it up earlier. A real treasure-trove of wisdom in this slim volume.
_Queen of France_ (Marie Antoinette), by Andre Castelot.
_Marie Antoinette, The Last Queen of France_ by Evelyne Lever.
--Cindy
Snow Crash is mostly about a hacker and a VR world. Great for Geeks and lovers of Cyberpunk. Probably not quite ready for middle america
I would reccomend, over Snow Crash, The Diamond Age.
It's about Nanotechnology, AI, and fun stuff like that.
Tokyo is Destroyed by an Earthquake, I believe, and is being rebuilt by the new Nanite technology. The towers of the city are made of diamonds.
But as in all Cyberpunk, the neato near-term tecnological advances are really just background.
Cyberpunk is Near-term Sci-Fi. Cyberpunk takes current social trends; like the corporatization of government, over-population, the distruction of family and community; and takes them into a dark near-future extreme.
By exaggerating some of the directions of our current cultural trends we might see more clearly i suppose.
The genre was created by William Gibson. He coined many of the phrases used in the 90s in his book, Cyberspace for instance. Aslo fanst and fun reads. Lots of action, lots of interesting concepts. Close enough into the future that you can relate, and many of the things we most likely will see before we go tits up.
It was either Gibson or Stephenson that co-authored a book, cyberpunk in the 18th century.
Basicly its a "What if computers were invented and as widespreadly used as today in the Victorian Era"
You may find it interesting, but I could not stomach to finish the book myself.
*Has anyone read _Snow Crash_ by Neal Stephenson? It's available at Amazon.com.
A former acquaintance of mine read it and loved it. I've read the reviews at Amazon.com; it received at least 4-star ratings from reviewers.
Apparently it's a "cyberpunk" near-futuristic novel. Looks interesting.
--Cindy
One of my Favorite writers.
It's a fast and easy read. Light stuff. Cyberpunk is an interesting style.
http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/printp … 98,00.html
CIA warns of defeat
13nov03
A TOP-secret CIA report warns that growing numbers of Iraqis believe the US-led coalition can be defeated and are supporting the resistance.
The report paints a bleak picture of the political and security situation and cautions that the US-led drive to rebuild the country as a democracy could collapse.
Paul Bremer, head of the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, who arrived unexpectedly in Washington for strategy sessions yesterday, endorsed the CIA's findings, a senior administration official said.
The report's tone and Mr Bremer's private endorsement differ sharply from public assessments.
President George W. Bush, chief aides and Mr Bremer are giving upbeat public pronouncements in an attempt to counter rising anxieties at home over US casualties in Iraq.
The report landed on the desks of senior US officials on Tuesday. The speed of the leak suggested that senior policymakers want to make sure the assessment reaches Mr Bush.
Some senior policymakers have complained of being frustrated in their efforts to provide Mr Bush with analyses that are more sombre than the optimistic views of Vice-President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld.
The CIA analysis suggests US policy in Iraq has reached a turning point, as the Bush administration moves to escalate the war against the guerillas and accelerate the transfer of power.
In Baghdad, the US military announced yesterday it would become more aggressive against former Saddam Hussein loyalists, foreign and Iraqi Islamic extremists and Iraqi nationalists.
The top US general in Iraq, Lieutenant-General Ricardo Sanchez, said: "The most important message is that we are
all going to get pretty tough, and that's what is needed to defeat the enemy, and we are definitely not shy of doing that when it is required."
Such a campaign, however, could cause more civilian casualties and drive more Iraqis to the side of the insurgents.
The CIA assessment also warns that none of the postwar Iraqi political institutions and leaders have shown an ability to govern or even preside over drafting a constitution or holding an election.
US officials have become deeply frustrated by infighting, nepotism and inaction within the 25-member Iraqi Governing Council.
http://www.abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap … 2_785.html
Bomb at Italian Base in Iraq Kills 25
Truck Bomb Explodes at Headquarters of Italy's Paramilitary Police in Iraq, Killing 25 People
The Associated Press
NASIRIYAH, Iraq Nov. 12 ? A suicide truck bomber attacked the headquarters of Italy's paramilitary police in this southern city on Wednesday, killing 25 people including 17 Italians and possibly trapping others in the debris.
It was the deadliest toll suffered by non-American coalition forces since the occupation began in April, and the first such attack in Nasiriyah, a relatively quiet Shiite Muslim city. The bombing appeared aimed at sending a message that international organizations are not safe anywhere in Iraq.
Col. Gianfranco Scalas said 17 Italians were killed: 11 Carabinieri paramilitary police, four army soldiers, an Italian civilian working at the base and an Italian documentary filmmaker. A spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition said at least eight Iraqis were also killed. About 15 people were wounded, although their nationalities were not known, Italian officials said.
"Unfortunately, it's not possible to exclude the presence of other fatalities," Defense Minister Antonio Martino told parliament.
There were fears of others trapped beneath the debris, and bulldozers worked to clear rubble. As night fell, however, soldiers said rescue efforts had ended.
Italian President Carlo Azeglio Ciampi called the bombing a "terrorist act," while Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi pledged that it wouldn't derail his country's commitment to helping Iraq.
Witnesses said the truck driver got past guards after a car ran a roadblock, distracting the sentries.
The truck rammed the gate of the Italian compound and exploded in front of the Carabinieri building, which was the former chamber of commerce building, a coalition spokesman, Andrea Angeli, said.
He said the force of the explosion blew out windows in another building across the Euphrates River. All the vehicles parked outside the stricken building exploded in flames.
Angeli said secondary explosions from ammunition stored in the compound rocked the area moments after the main blast.
Also Wednesday, U.S. troops in Baghdad accidentally fired on a car carrying a member of the Iraqi Governing Council. The council member, Mohammed Bahr al-Uloun, escaped injury but the driver was wounded.
And a roadblock in Fallujah, a restive city west of the capital, U.S. troops fired on a truck carrying live chickens Tuesday night, killing five civilians.
"They went to bring chickens ... and they came back at 9 or 10 at night and we were waiting for them," said Khalid Khalifa al-Jumaily, whose two nephews were killed on the truck. "The Americans fired on them."
The U.S. military said it no immediate information on the shootings.
In separate attacks, an American soldier was killed when a roadside bomb exploded near a U.S. patrol by the town of Taji northwest of Baghdad, the U.S. military said. A 1st Armored Division soldier died of wounds suffered in a roadside bombing in Baghdad on Tuesday.
Their deaths bring to 153 the number of soldiers killed by hostile fire since President Bush declared an end to active combat May 1.
The truck bomb in Nasiriyah, about 180 miles southeast of Baghdad, went off at about 10:40 a.m. in front of base of the Carabinieri's multinational specialist unit, the Italian paramilitary police said.
Italy has sent about 2,300 troops to help rebuild Iraq. About 340 Carabinieri are based in Nasiriyah, along with 110 Romanians.
Alice Moldovan, a spokeswoman for Romania's Defense Ministry, said there were no reports of Romanian victims.
Carabinieri are paramilitary police under the Defense Ministry, and frequently serve in international missions such as in Afghanistan and the Balkans.
Since August, car and truck bombs have targeted several international buildings in Baghdad, including the United Nations headquarters, the offices of the international Red Cross, the Al-Rasheed Hotel and the Turkish and Jordanian embassies.
Although Nasiriyah has been quiet in recent months, it was the scene of heavy fighting during the war. It was where the 507th Maintenance Company was ambushed in March and where a number of Americans were captured, including Jessica Lynch.
Italy had suffered no combat deaths during the occupation. The Italian official heading U.S. efforts to recover Iraq's looted antiquities, Pietro Cordone, was in a car that came under mistaken U.S. fire in September in northern Iraq. His Iraqi interpreter was killed.
Earlier Wednesday, a member of the Iraqi Governing Council said the body was not to blame for the lack of progress in drafting a constitution that would enable democratic elections and a return to Iraqi independence.
The comments by Mahmoud Othman, a Sunni Kurd member of the U.S.-appointed body, follow reports that Bush's national security advisers are frustrated by the council's performance and are consulting with Iraq's top American administrator, L. Paul Bremer, over how to break the deadlock.
"Such accusations are unreasonable and do no good for the country," Othman said. "The Governing Council should not alone bear the responsibility of any inefficiency."
Othman acknowledged the constitutional process was moving too slowly but said Iraq's U.S.-led administration bore much of the blame.
"This is supposed to be a partnership based on equality," Othman said in an interview. "But when Americans want to find solution for their problems, they do it in any way that suits them."
Bremer said Wednesday after meeting with administration officials in Washington that he believed the Iraqis were becoming "more and more effective in their assumption of authority."
"I don't think it's fair to say the IGC is failing," Bremer said.
Bremer attended a White House meeting Tuesday with Secretary of State Colin Powell, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and other key officials.
Administration officials expressed disappointment in the council's work but said Bush was not about to disband it.
"The notion that we are about to throw the council to the wolves is exaggerated," a senior administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. "But there is a need to put some energy into the political transition."
U.S. officials believe key members of the Iraqi council are stalling in hopes of winning concessions from American leaders under political pressure to turn over power to the Iraqis. In contrast, Bremer wants to transfer sovereignty after the Iraqis draft a constitution and hold national elections.
Othman denied members of the body were intentionally stalling work on the new charter in order to exert pressure on Bremer.
"It is true that council members are demanding more powers, but they are not trying to use the slowness in the process of work as a weapon to gain concessions," he said.
The Iraqis have yet to agree on how to choose delegates to draw up a constitution.
Also Wednesday, Iraqi police in Qadisiyah detained several people suspected of involvement in an apparent rocket attack that brought down a U.S. Black Hawk helicopter near Saddam Hussein's hometown of Tikrit last week, killing six soldiers, a U.S. official said.
Before dawn, nearly the entire 500-member police force of Tikrit searched door-to-door in a dusty suburb looking for weapons and insurgents.
Looks like our erstwhile, resident political correspondent for the 'Socialist Worker' has re-emerged with his usual flare!
:laugh:I wonder where he goes when he's not here at New Mars explaining the true, clear, non-propaganda realities of world politics to us benighted sheep?
The question is, with such a response, It's a wonder I ever come back.
The cyinic in me looks at Iraq as the 'center front in the war on terror'. Just like Afhganistan is a 'side front in the war on terror'.
So here is something to consider, something the pundits don't neccessarily say out loud, that this adminstration new full well that going into Iraq, like Afhganistan, would draw terroists into the country. Like a magnet.
Now, why on Earth would they invade a foreign country, knowing that terroists would flock there?
Why would they be 'surprised' by the number of extremists sneaking through the borders? Isn't the US the same nation with the much vaunted 'aerial recconaisance' that allows us to watch just about anywhere, at anytime?
Wouldn't they expect for foreign terroists to try and get into the country through Iran, Syria, Saudia Arabia, and Kuwait?
Now, say what you will about this administration, but they do have a few bright cookies who can see a bit further than their own nose.
So perhaps, just maybe, quite possibly, they decided to go into Iraq, like Afghanistan, in order to draw the terroists there.
It's a sad thought, but if you're a leader of a certain country, and are faced with two options, one, being to lock down your own nation, and your own populace, from small bands of terroists who may or may not strike at any time, or two, go into another country, drawing the terroists there, so they are less likely to strike your own nation. Which would you choose?
Car bombs in Iraq are horrible for the people there, and for us, since we bring this chaos to them, but Iraqi people don't vote for the US president.
A plane explodes, or an embassy is destroyed in Iraq, our nation dosen't have a billion-dollar economic hiccup.
Just something to think about.
Now, say what you will about this administration, but they do have a few bright cookies who can see a bit further than their own nose.
This administration has been at warfare between the state dept and the defense dept sence long before the first tank rolled on bagdhad.
The state dept had long and exhaustive meetings about the post war problems that needed to be dealt with, brought in dozens of experts and spent millions of dollars. In the end they were ignored.
The Defense dept put all it's hopes in an ignoramous exile named Chalibi, in fact he was the source of most of the bullshit intelligence.
Machivelli said "Never trust the Exiles"
They expected Chalibi to come in like a hero and lead Iraq into democracy. Chalibi got laughed out of Iraq as an untrusted outsider.
No, this administration does not know what its doing.
I firmly believe that history will judge Dubya favorably over Iraq. Despite strong disagreements with some of Bush's policies, in Iraq we have achieved a tremendous victory for human rights and established a foothold for freedom and the rule of law in a part of the world awash in hate and terror. Casualties are unfortunate, but if we've grown so soft we can't stomach them then we've already lost, the American dream is over.
I firmly believe that history will judge Dubya favorably over Iraq.
I firmly believe otherwise.
Despite strong disagreements with some of Bush's policies, in Iraq we have achieved a tremendous victory for human rights
I thought the war on iraq was about Nukes, or was it WMD? Or was it cutting a head off a potental future threat? Where was the call to support the human rights of the people of Iraq before the war? it was virtually non existant until we were already there, and all the other fits of bullshit played out to be false.
The UN has all but pulled out, and now the Red Cross.
Where is the bastion for Human Rights in Iraq? the US Military?
The US Military is not a hman rights force, not a peace jeeping force, and certianly not a police force. the US Military has no such training in these matters. none.
the US military knows how to kill people and break things and god bless em they know how to do it well when it matters.
But if you think we went to iraq for human rights issues, than your eating more bullshit pie. It was not the agricultural or economic or health ministries that the us sent commandos into to protect from day one of the war. It was the Oil ministry. All the other were blown to hell. Where do you think the priorities lie?
Casualties are unfortunate, but if we've grown so soft we can't stomach them then we've already lost, the American dream is over.
If we do not see the value in the human lives were losing, both american soldiers and innocent iraqi civilians, than THAT would be the end of the american dream my friend.
However, the fact that you seem surprised by it, as though it's something that shouldn't be happening in a country described as humanity's 'last best hope', is an endearing demonstration of your ingenuous idealism. I understand it and admire it.
The formation of Democracy here in Amercia was thought of the same.
Thank god the world has Idealists.
Democracy is a lame duck; the best system among an altogether bad lot of systems. One of the few things it has going for it is that people like you, Cindy, can at least blow the whistle on corruption (albeit uselessly) without being imprisoned or executed for it!
The nice thing about democracy is that this is only true if you let it be so.
Cindy, that seemed a little harsh and... vehemently rhetorical I guess is the best way to put it. Not to be insensitive to those who have lost people in Iraq, but in a historical perspective things are going remarkably well. I'm not a huge GW fan myself, but the cause is just and our conduct has been honorable.
Remarkably Well?
In what context?
The funny thing about a war is, it's the losers who decide when the winner wins.
We tried this in Viatnam, we said "hey we won, and were pulling out! Go USA." And south viatnam went to hell in sort order afterwards.
Womens rights are lower than they were pre-gulf war 1. Unemployment is astronmical, pre gulf war 1 bagdad had a better employment rate than current NYC.
Pre gulf war 2 Iraq was virtually Al'Quida free. Religious Fanatacism has a rarity. Now all forms of radicalism are abundant. In fact Iraq now is a magnet for jihadists all over the world.
In the middle east currently many many people who formally would not give a second though to islamic radicalism, who shunned and considered them radicals, now believe the "Western Imperialism" propoganda. Infact to may americans it seems to no longer be propoganda but realty.
There is a real and urgent fear within both the Democratic party and the NeoCon's that the current administration might see Iraq as too much of a political liability. We may see bush and co cut their losses, declare victory and hand the nation over to the nearest available dictator. that is a real threat.
Put in a historic context, sure Iraq is nothing compared to WW2 or even the Civil War in terms of carnage.
But the modern world is much more different. The world expects so much from us, and often follows our lead. The world is globaly connected through sattilites and cables.
This is the Information age, and the battle is over Ideas.
That is the war we are losing.
The US military Psy-Ops program combined with it's Public relations program for this war.
In this war, we failed to make the progress we had hoped because the Propoganda we spewed was nowhere near as effective in Iraq and the Middle East as it was on us at home.
Survivability.
I would like to see sentient minds of human descent remain in existance for the duration of this universe. It would be a beautiful thing if it could.
The first big step is moving off this planet and onto another.
Hi ALToWAR,
I understand your post is not specifically about evolution, but since we are discussing it in the life thread, may I ask what is your beliefs or opinions about the theories of evolution.
Do you believe in Darwin's 'survival of the fitest' , also called 'survival of the surviviest' by Darwin's oponents ?
Yes, Survival of the fittest, essentially. I am sure there are parts and pieces to the theory that still need work, but nothing so drastic as to conclude that divine intervention is required.
Have you ever looked into Memetics?
Meme: an information pattern, held in an individual's memory, which is capable of being copied to another individual's memory.
Memetics: the theoretical and empirical science that studies the replication, spread and evolution of memes
I believe that Plant and Animal life evolves somewhat similar to ideas and human knowledge.
For example, you could follow the course of Christianity, and watch as the Ideas changed over time to better flourish in the environment. Not by the direct and concious effort by any individual or group of individuals, but instead directed by what works and what does not.
Rugged Individualism.
In the 'Global Economy' I am required to build and refine a very specialized skill-set to live comfortably. I would prefer to be more broad. I would prefer to have more of my fate in my hands.
New Beginnings.
In nature, one creature can fill a niche so well as to exclude any alternative from growing and evolving.
I believe there are different ways for humans to survive. Ways that promote equality and compassion. Ways that are sustainable.
I do not believe that here on earth any other culture or structure can compete with capitalism and consumerism.
With enough distance and time, perhaps a new way for humans to live could sprout, take root, and eventually flouroush.
Diversity.
In nature Diversity is strength.
Survivability.
I would like to see sentient minds of human descent remain in existance for the duration of this universe. It would be a beautiful thing if it could.
The first big step is moving off this planet and onto another.
Beauty.
Because it is.
For a new direction.
So much effort is put towards distruction. Nations go to wars just to obtain identity and purpose. Mars could offer the same rewards with much less suffering.
Poetic Justice.
Mankind could spend it's adolescence as a sentient race grossly removing life from it's life rich homeworld, and spend it's adulthood creating and nourishing life on a dead one.
Time.
We may run out of it. We should go while we still can. You never know what the future may have in store for us.
Perspective.
It's possible that having humanity span two worlds might change the way many of us see ourselves and our environment.
Posterity.
It would be a wonderful gift to give the future.
Dignity.
It would be a task we could all take pride in. Dignity is essential to a healthy socoety.
Fear
I have seen what man can do to other man. I fear them and wish to get as much distance from them as i can.
Greed.
Those that go first will live a defining adventure in the course of humanity. I desire to be one of them. Failing that I desire to live through their experiences vicariously.
Solitude.
I could dig some time alone.
The primary Export from Mars will be Entertainment and Media.