You are not logged in.
Although you will find that most people are more intersted in provening how much smarter they are than you, or terroring down your ideas.
Hi Koen, and welcome to New Mars!
I'm sure Earthfirst said that with tongue firmly in cheek :;):
... because actually you'll find New Mars to be a very tolerant community, refreshingly open to new and outlandish ideas. If some people come across otherwise sometimes, well, it's honestly just because they're professional scientists or very experienced amateurs who like to keep people straight. I've been "put right" many times, and appreciate it.
You've chosen a great time to join us, with a big announcement due tomorrow!
Re tomorrow's news... imagination's running riot here...
Some random thoughts tho...
* Can't help thinking it is something that actually justifies the use of the term "major" because Sean O'Keefe himself is MC'ing... did he introduce the big announcement about El Capitan being "drenched" by water in the past? I can't remember...
* We've all been frustrated about Opportunity's reluctance to get out of the crater... this could explain why.
* There has been a LOT of attention paid to the "blueberries" over the past week - the JPL guys really seemed to leap towards the "berry bowl" they found. I'm convinced the announcement is something to do with the berries. Not sure if I go for your "fungus" theory Cindy, but wow, wouldn't that be something...
What's everyone else thinking?
Okay, anyone care to guess what *this* is about..?
<< NASA ANNOUNCES MAJOR MARS ROVER FINDING
NASA will announce a major scientific finding at a Space
Science Update (SSU) Tuesday at 2 p.m. EST, in the headquarters
Webb Auditorium, 300 E St. SW, Washington. The Mars Exploration
Rover (MER) Opportunity is exploring the martian Meridiani
Planum and recently discovered evidence rocks at the landing
site have been altered by water.
NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe will make opening remarks. SSU
panelists:
--Dr. Ed Weiler, NASA's Associate Administrator, Office of
Space Science
--Prof. Steve Squyres, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., and
MER Principal Investigator
--Prof. John Grotzinger, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, Mass, and a MER Co-investigator
--Dr. Dave Rubin, U.S. Geological Survey Sedimentologist at the
Pacific Science Center in Santa Cruz, Calif.
--Dr. Jim Garvin, NASA Lead Scientist for Mars and the Moon,
Office of Space Science, NASA Headquarters >>
Look at the list of panellists... a sedimentologist?
Thoughts anyone..?
Some stunning new pics here... can even see some details on the hills...
[http://www.keithlaney.com/SCI/CSIpan2.jpg]http://www.keithlaney.com/SCI/CSIpan2.jpg
[http://www.keithlaney.com/SCI/J6.jpg]http://www.keithlaney.com/SCI/J6.jpg
[http://www.keithlaney.com/SCI/S3.jpg]http://www.keithlaney.com/SCI/S3.jpg
Don't mean to worry anyone, but I think the Borg may already be on Mars...
[http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/galler … 53R1M1.JPG]http://origin.mars5.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery....1M1.JPG
Errr... Folks...
Guess what Spirit found? Spirit, not Opportunity!
http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/2M1328 … .JPG.html]
Oh boy...
That looks like real river-bed or -bank gravel to me... anyone else?
Anyone else beginning to think there was once a LOT of water at these two landing sites..?
Everyone...
Feast your eyes on this...
(Josh - fancy a hike around that crater rim gathering samples..? )
[http://mer.rlproject.com/index.php?act= … ost&id=486]http://mer.rlproject.com/index.php?act= … ost&id=486
Gorgeous Bonneville panorama here...
[http://mer.rlproject.com/index.php?act= … ost&id=416]http://mer.rlproject.com/index.php?act= … ost&id=416
The crater interior looks a little bland at first glance, but look at all that luvverly ejecta lying around... bet the geologists are jumping on the spot!
Shaun,
My canoe is paddling alongside yours all the way my friend, whatever rapids come up ahead of us.
I have been absolutely convinced that there's life on Mars for as long as I can remember, certainly long before all this luvverly evidence for a warm and wet ancient Mars started coming in. I've given my views and stood up for me beliefs in print in magazines and newspapers, on radio shows, even on TV a couple of times. I have been doubted, questioned, interrogated, laughed at politely, ridiculed openly, called ten different kinds of fanatic/weirdo/optimist/whatever and still, STILL I believe, and every mission and every picture from every probe just convinces me even more deeply that this feeling I have in my gut is right, that there's life there. Maybe in the soil, maybe deep underground. Maybe sheltering in cold, submartian aquifers, maybe clinging to existence on the edges of hot springs hidden in the depths of the Mariner Valley. I don't know. All I know is that something tells me that Mars isn't dead, and that sooner or later one of these robotic ambassadors of ours is going to find the proof everyone *else* needs That's why the loss of Beagle was so crushing for me personally. I was sure it was going to send back that proof.
It's hard to explain, it really is. Sometimes I wonder if I'm just kidding myself, being too optimistic, seeing shapes in the clouds as it were. But other times I just have a feeling that I can't shake off, you know? That feeling was especially strong last August when Mars was so big and bright in my telescope, and in the telescopes of the members of my astronomical society. After an evening of illustrated lectures, we held a public Mars Gazing Party up at a local school, and over 200 people came along to be shown Mars through our telescopes. And every time I sneaked a peek, and saw the little orange disc shimmering in the eyepiece, with the dark shark fin notch of Syrtis Major at its centre, I just knew that I was looking at a world that has, and hides, life.
Like I said, hard to explain, I'm going to stop trying. Just wanted you to know that there's at least one more canoeist out here paddling frantically against the currents of skepticism... :;):
Congratulations on your site, there's some really interesting stuff on there
Welcome to NM too!
Do you want cheap missions funded by pizza hut that crash on the surface rather than expensive one that at least have some successful achievment ?
I hope that wasn't a dig at Beagle 2... this is no time for gloating... :;):
I'm not professionally qualified to comment on this debate, I'm just a keen rock-hound amateur who's been in love with things martian since I was knee-high to a jawa, but listening to last night's press conference I was struck by how many times Steve Squyres made a great effort to stress how there were *other* possible explanations for parts of the Opportunity Outcrop story, and he was very, very careful to say that a LOT more work needs to be done to confirm once and for all the exact nature and history of this fascinating site. In fact, I thought he was sat so solidly on the fence at times during the briefing that I was worried he might be getting splinters in certain delicate areas... :;): So I think he was being very fair given the circumstances - he was breaking the news that the "space world" had been waiting for for a loooooong time. In his shoes I'd have been tempted to jump up and shout "Yesssssss!!!!!!!"
To be fair, I think Steve and the rest of the guys were just giving a "heads up" about the potential of the area and of the findings so far, whilst stressing the good parts. But that's not a crime. Of course NASA is going to put positive spin - as we call it here in the UK - on elements of a story which support their own agendas and goals. Apart from the major investments they've made with these rovers - financial, personal and reputations - they are also aware of the thirst out here, in the public world, for information and results. They can't do right for doing wrong - if they delay giving news, it's a cover up. If they give news as soon as they can, they're accused of jumping to conclusions. I say let's cheer them to the rooftops for an amazing success, and give them the credit they deserve. I mean, anyone who saw the look of sheer pride on Steve's face last night can't doubt how much this means to him - or how committed he is to Getting This Right.
I also think we should remember that those men and women at JPL are *explorers* at heart, maybe even explorers first and scientists second, which some people might think is wrong but I love them for it.
To be perfectly honest, I can't really comment on the hard science here, or argue about it, I have to take Steve's and the gang's word for it - and rely on the thoughtful and informed postings of others here on New Mars - to keep me straight, because the science of sediments, layering, cross-bedding, vugs etc is so far over my head that I'd need a telescope to see it. All I know is that I sat here last night, staring at a little window on my computer screen, watching and listening to a group of exhausted but happy looking JPL engineers and computer pilots telling the world that they are pretty sure they've found evidence that Opportunity's landing site was once underwater, that Mars may well, as we've all hoped and imagined, have been a warmer, wetter world with sun-dappled lakes, gentle rain and maybe even life.
I'll leave it to others to debate the science, and I'll rey on many of you to keep me informed about the pros and cons of the argument. But for now, I'm just thinking about what it would have been like to stand in that crater a billion years ago and see a glorious sunrise reflected in the lake or pool that used to be there. And if this leads to a sample return mission, and after that to a manned landing, then I'll be even happier. But as Ellie Arroway's father says in the movie and book of CONTACT...
"Small steps Ellie... small steps..."
Woo-hoo!! The rocks in the Outcrop were once "drenched in water", and show signs of having been "altered by the presence of liquid water"... the Blueberries are "concretions"... This just gets better and better...! :laugh:
For a killer 3D pic of one of the trenches - a nice warm-up act for tonight's announcement (whatever it is!) - treat yourselves to a click here...
[http://www.marsunearthed.com/Opportunit … y29_3D.htm]http://www.marsunearthed.com/Opportu...._3D.htm
You'll think you're standing over it, honestly The level of detail visible in the material which has crumbled away from the sides is absolutely stunning...
So you guys were right!
Rumour has it, early next week big press conference!
[http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/o … 40229.html]Space.com
Yeah, that's the report that really got me thinking and started to slot pieces of the jigsaw puzzle into place. If there is a press conference scheduled for next week it's a pretty safe bet that news will leak out before then, so we might just have a couple of days to wait...
BTW. Why is everybody so annoyed with the sundial? If you want to take scientifically meaningful pictures, you have to do some serious calibration. It's not like the MER's can put a Kodak colour-calibration card on the ground, step back, and take a snapshot... So this is the way to do it... *every single* picture i take for my documentation (of restoration jobs) contains such a card. Without it, they're useless. You have to have a standard to compare to what you're documenting.
Good point, well made
It's just that as an amateur rock-hound and frustrated martian explorer every time I see a pic of that sundial I can't help thinking "that's a picture that could have been of more rocks, or dust drifts, or bedrock..."
And boy, that Ayers Rock-coloured ridge visible over the edge of Opportunity's horizon is REALLY calling to me... !!!
Don't want to sound all ALIAS here, but is anyone else out there getting the twitchy-itchy feeling that the JPL guys are being so quiet because they're building up to a Big Announcement of some kind?
I don 't know, maybe it's me, but it just feels very trickle-down, drip-feedy science at the moment. The "news" and comments all seems to be about page 3 or 4 little things like the sizes of pebbles, how cool it is the rovers have spotted discarded pieces of themselves, how gorgeous the martian sunset is... Day after day we see page after page of pictures of that BL**DY sundial :rant: and the tiny sun, and no-one seems to be commenting on the fascinating and intriguing details seen in the pictures of the trenches dug by the rovers' wheels... And suddenly, even tho we're now drooling over pics of features out in the World Beyond The Crater there seems to be no rush to get Opportunity out of its crater, even when you can almost hear the rover itself screaming LET ME OUT!!!!!
I've been surfing and scanning many websites (tip: cyanova.com's space pages ( [http://www.cyanova.com/news/space.html]http://www.cyanova.com/news/space.html ) are an excellent resource for one-stop headline browsing) and many commentators seem to think the same thing - that JPL and NASA are slowly building-up to some sort of announcement about the existence of water on Mars now, today, and the implications that has for the existence of life. Gil Levin - one of the team who worked on the Viking missions and still, today, insists the Vs' instruments detected life there - is very excited about the pictures of the trenches and of the so-called "Magic Carpet" material, which he, like me in fact, thinks is mud, surface material rich in perhaps a briny water-ice that flowed briefly when compacted by the airbags. he also thinks that the material exposed in the wheel-dug trenches could even be ice. That might be pushing it a bit far, even for a bio-optimist like myself, but the debate is going on out there, and I'm just wondering if the usually-effusive JPL teams are now being so hush-hush because just around the corner is a Big Thing...
I mean, listen Scully... both rovers are heading for craters, now or at least soon, and peering into the craters will allow us to look beneath the surface, where we've always been convinced water lurks, in whatever form. I don't know, I'm just sensing in my gut that the rovers' missions are shifting - or may even already have shifted, behind closed JPL doors - from the search for evidence of past water to a search for existing water...
Are Spirit and Opportunity about to become water-diviners, or ice prospectors? Could the rovers have a chance of finding something even more exotic than hematite, or even ice?
Thoughts anyone?
A nice nice colour composite of the large ridge on the horizon from Keith Laney
Oh wow... look at that detail and colouring! One of the coolest pics yet I reckon, thanks for the heads up!
Wowza... Must be East Crater, judging from the full-res landing pics. [http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/mer2004/rover-i … age-6.html]They're here...
Right again Rxke
[http://www.marsunearthed.com/Opportunit … Region.htm]http://www.marsunearthed.com/Opportu....ion.htm
Any Idea?
You should bear in mind that these are actually pictures taken by the rovers' microscopes. It's easy to think you can spot familiar shapes and symbols on them. But at this scale anything artificial is highly unlikely.
Keep enjoying the pictures tho, and welcome to New Mars
Wowza again... That's *a lot* of white stuff on the rim... Same stuff as in the 'home crater? Same stuff they unearthed while doing the dig?
Spirit, meanwhile: compare some pictures from the initial landing point to where it is now, terrain is gettin a whole lot rougher quickl, more and bigger sized rocks. He must've landed in the smoothest spot around...
Yeah, just what I was thinking about the crater...just think if that edge is *all* bedrock? Would that mean Opp landed in a truly ancient area? Will East Crater be full of beads and berries? How many gateau-like layers will Opp stare down upon in East Crater's walls when it climbs the slopes and looks over the side..? Can't wait!!!
As for the terrain Spirit is driving into, yes, for days now I've been struck by how "difficult" it looks, especially when you browse the 3D pics of the area. Some big rocks, and so many smaller rocks so close together, the drivers are going to have their work cut out for them, that's for sure.
Wow, what were the odds of Spirit landing in such a flat area, and of Opportunity pulling-off a cosmic "Hole In One" with its own crater landing?
Er, guys... guys? Looks like Opportunity has been peeping over the crater rim... What's that bright ridge on the horizon over there..? ???
[http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/1P1312 … 1.JPG.html]http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/1P1312 … 1.JPG.html
[http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/1P1312 … 1.JPG.html]http://www.lyle.org/mars/imagery/1P1312 … 1.JPG.html
SoHoBoy...
Furthermore i *do* think they'll land in vincinity of a rover, it would be crazy to land in a place where you don't have details about the surface conditions... Rover should offer a scouting mission that'll be sorely needed before people land, I'd think (See RobS book he's writing)
Yeah, you're right, I've always thought that too, I have no idea why I said that!
Okay, we agree on the pre-Sample Return Mission cut-off point for lander / rover preservation. That's progress
Not only can it save payload space, if they did design in back up equipment on rovers that could be used again by manned missions it could prove lifesaving if the primary equipment carried with them failed. Would we wish to tell a crew that they could not touch any equipment that is on the surface as they may be required in the future for historical purposes - if that very same equipment meant the difference between completing a mission and getting back safely or becoming the first casualty of Mars?
Well, that maybe worked for Val Kilmer in RED PLANET but in real life the chances of a stranded or incapacitated manned expedition crew being saved by one of Spirit's circuit boards are rather remote. And personally, if a manned expedition had to rely on that kind of thing as a "back up" plan then it would be too risky to send in the first place. The next logical extension of this argument is to have each lander and rover carrying a 10L bottle of Evian water "just in case future explorers need more supplies".
Also, the rovers are hardly going to be everywhere, are they? There won't be enough of them to provide emergency resource coverage for the entire planet. It's more than possible that the first manned expeditions will set down in areas unexplored by rovers because they'll want to see new geology and compare and contrast landforms/minerals with those studied by previous unmanned missions.
Of course in a life or death situation then all bets are off, people come before probes, and must, every time, and if a crewed expedition was in trouble in a location near a lander / rover, and that old hardware might give them a solution then fine, cannibalise away. But I think we're getting off the original argument a little.
No-one on this board wants to see people on Mars more than I do (well okay, everyone does, it's just a figure of speech! :laugh: ) but let's not kid ourselves that fitting a few more bits and bobs on rovers-to-come, or superglueing aerials and/or hot-wiring in-situ landers will free up enough payload space or budget for an extra crewman on a mission.
Stu, I understand your point of view, but consider this scenario: We have two MER, more stuff going up every 2 years, let's say we as humans won't get there before 2030, thats 15-20 pieces of hardware extra there (assuming Europe will launch landers too. Where do you draw the line? All or most of these things will land in the 'best' spots, for starters. Some will be 'generic' stuff, if ESA keeps doing the smart thing: recycle proved and tested platforms as they did in Mars Express...
Imagine 12 MER copies 'lying' around...
Sure the MERs of today are worth preserving, they're real breakthroughs, historically... But MER 5.2.a ? Dunno so sure anymore... And just building into the (hypothetical) future rover an exra connector, so you can 'revive' it for for example comm duties, that's not going to hurt it too much, I'd think. No, it would be a 'hats off to the guys of JPL for making such versatile hardware.' Later on you can still put it up in Marsonian institute. No harm done.
The problem is, there'll be no "later on". As soon as serious manned space exploration / exploitation begins, there will be a roaring trade in salvaging (i.e. stealing) spaceflight memorabilia from Mars, and before Mars the Moon, so unless the landers etc are gathered up and put in one place when there's no further need for them they will be vandalised and carcass-stripped long before they can be integrated into a useful planetary comms system.
Without treaties / agreements / law in place to prevent it, people will go scurrying around Chryse, Utopia, Ares, Gusev and Meridiani collecting every bit of hardware they can find for sale on the black market. Investors / collectors back on Earth with enough money and determination will find ways to ship Viking's robot arm, Sojourner's wheels and Spirit's camera mast back, for display in their own private collections, you can bet on that. How would you feel if you found out that the Columbia crew dedication plaque lovingly fixed to Spirit had been *stolen* and smuggled back home to Earth? Would that be worth the extra expense of building dedicated comms hardware?
Science fiction pessimism? Nope. This happens now, here on Earth. Artefacts from ancient countries, from the pyramids, temples and archaeological sites around the world are Tomb Raided and horded by individuals. More legitimately, we explore the Titanic and bring items back to the surface "for posterity" rather than leave them in place.
So while I agree that it may not be practical to save *everything*, we should certainly make the effort for hardware sent there, say, before the first sample return, that would be a logical cutoff point. What do you think?
I'm sorry, but I just can't agree that we should leave the Vikings, Sojourner and Spirit etc in place just to use them as glorified makeshift cellphone masts in years to come. There's a big - and justified - campaign now to save the Saturn V tower. No-one's keen on covering it in mobile phone dishes, or even melting it down to use in the new Crew Exploration Vehicle...