You are not logged in.
Yeah. One more question, how is this silane produced on Mars?
Ah, I see.
Quick question everyone, how would the density of the Martian atmosphere affect the burning of silane? I like the idea of burning silane with CO2, but I was wondering if the low density of the Martian atmosphere might hinder the burning-and require us to collect CO2 before running the engine.
I really like the idea though.
Addendum:
Silane (Silicon hydride)
Boiling point
-112C
All silanes (There are multiple types!) are spontaneously inflammable in air and oxygen. SiH compounds are good reducing agents. I'll look some more into this.
Addendum 2: I'll see if I can get my hands on some silane, CO2, vacuum chamber, and a Sterling Engine.
A stirling cycle engine moves a piston by means of heating and cooling a gas. With a steam engine, you would have to use precious water-or some other liquid. It is my understanding that this is something to avoid. If you can think of a way to run a power-generating turbine on Mars-without consuming oxygen or water, please share your ideas.
My problem with big dumb internal combustion beasts really has to do with the lack of readily availible fuel on Mars.
I was trying to stick with technology that would be readily availible to settlers.
"Why nuclear? Never seen nuclear powered trains on earth...I live in Belgium, one of the countries with a VERY closely knit rail-net, and i see a lot of trains, every day (travel daily by train...)"
Nuclear fuel would likely last the longest, and be more reliable. Plus, I think the land-train would be easily capable of carrying a small reactor.
When Martian transport is more advanced, we could go all-electric, but with early colonization efforts I favor the nuclear land-train.
Sadly, the land train in the picture has gone the way of the Dodo as far as I know. Power-wise, I don't think you'd have to beam power from the lead engine via microwave. Ordinary cables would work just fine.
Going nuclear seems a better option then chemical fuel if you are going to be using a piece of equipment like this. Mind you, I would also outfit any potential train with some back up batteries and solar panels.
That way, you need not worry about running out of gas.
Couple these with some lovely electric-drive wheels (Also something built by Mr. LeTourneau) and I think a modified Land train would work very well on Mars.
A side note on the silane engine: You'd want a Stirling cycle engine, instead of a normal steam engine. You get significantly less power though.
Neutrino, I love your idea of using a sail/balloon concept to propel a rover. There is only one problem I can see with the Windsurfer. This problem has everything to do with the balloon.
A helium filled balloon rises because it is less dense then the air around, to the degree that the air pushes it upwards. This is exactly the same reason why some things float in water. An object displaces a weight of water, equal to-or greater then the weight of the object, and thus it floats.
It is the same way with air/gas.
The low density of the Martian atmosphere will likely be a problem. What if Martian air is LESS dense then the helium?
Would the balloon not then fall to the surface?
On a world with a dense atmosphere though, the Windsurfer is a great idea!
Unfortunately Scott, calling someone immature is just as bad as calling them a fruitcake.
I find this idea of Euthenia silly. Societal engineering tends to work out badly.
I propose avoiding agreeing on what to teach children in the first place-other then a strong math/science curriculum.
Perhaps Martian education might be the way you envision it-but it might not. If the early Martians are idealists who would be dead set against your idea-then I see Euthenia as being merely a castle in the air.
On a future Martian colony, which do you think would be more likely to be used on ground transportation vehicles; tires or tracks-or some other method of moving along the ground?
Personally, I favor tracks as they require no synthetic rubber and no material to inflate them. Which do you think would be most practical?
On the subject of American Freedoms:
It is a sad sign of the times when people cannot trust each other, sad but true. I fear that Al-Qaeda's jihad may very well succeed-not in letter, but in spirit.
The deepening ideological animosity between right and left could do more to hurt us then Al Qaeda ever could.
Is there a solution? I don't know.
If we leave Iraq, and cease the WoT, they will likely cheer and use it as impetus to construe further attacks. If we stay, there will be blood. It's a damned-if-we-do, damned-if- we-dont-scenario.
A WMD assault could be the straw that broke the camel's back
"you can't own the moon. it's made of cheese."
Camembert I think.
Watch A Grand Day Out, it is a rather funny movie made by the same folks who made Chicken Run. Space Exploration on a moon of Cheese!
The problem with the Space Island Group is that they are visionaries. They speak of spending a billion dollars here, a couple billion there. The entire budget of NASA is around 3 Billion. That sort of money is hard to come by these days.
Unless Space Island Group has around 4 billion dollars, I think they might be building castles in the air.
Concerning the Moon: There must be some way in which we can both commercially use the moon and preserve it.
I agree and disagree with Free Spirit.
We've got to develop the Moon-but developing the moon does not neccessarily mean that we have to deface it. For instance, you could mandate that all settlements be built underground (Excepting Solar Panels and such) so that the surface will not be marred.
On a personal level, I think it would be cool to look into the night sky and see the moon dotted with the lights of cities-but that's just me.
Aw...You're taking all the good positions of leadership. Fine, you be queen-I'll go invade France.
Hey if he gets mars, I get the rest of the solar system
How about a Million Martian Marching Society?
![]()
"What do you think it would take for the general American populace to accept the imposition of marshall law and a suspension of habeus corpus?"
I think martial law may have been imposed once or twice on a small scale. My hometown Tulsa for instance, had a massive race riot in the TWENTIES. They had to call out the National Guard to break it up.
Why does a child leave the cradle? He or she will only die a few years later.
Besides, define normal. If your definition of "Normal" is someone who has no reasons to go to space, Mars, the moon-then there's no point in arguing with you.
The duty of our generation is this
1) Prove that there is a "New World"
2) Prove that it is beneficial to live there and that problems can be overcome.
3) Make it practical for the poor and downtrodden here on earth to go there. There will always be people who get a very small slice of the pie, but there's no reason we can't do our best to help them-by increasing the amount of pie availible.
The problem with us is that we are obsessed with gazing at our navels. Stop gazing at your navel humanity. All the self-help books in the world aren't going to help you if you don't do anything.
The barbarism comment was made in response to
Going to Mars should be a break from barabaric practices such as capital punishment. If future Martians practice "Olde West" frontier law, I don't think the settlements would be able to last very long...
I was merely pointing out that whether or not a practice was barbaric, depends entirely on who you are.
Barbaric
1. Of, relating to, or characteristic of barbarians.
Barbarian
1. A member of a people considered by those of another nation or group to have a primitive civilization.
So in one sense, it is relative, but in another sense it isn't.
But to preach on the meanings of words was not my intent, my intent was to stimulate discussion on how any future Martian colony might deal with offenders.
Of course I intend to direct the development of Mars by actually going there. Hurry up NASA.
Bah, barbarism is wholly relative. Same with capital punishment. It is only barbaric if you think it so.
Interesting idea on criminal justice, having a tele-court might not be a bad idea at all. That said, I think a Martian criminal's lawyer would immediately demand Martians to be on the jury, as the accused should be tried by their peers.
Don't tell me you really think this... Going to Mars should be a break from barabaric practices such as capital punishment. If future Martians practice "Olde West" frontier law, I don't think the settlements would be able to last very long...
It is speculation. Quite a lot of towns founded in the 1800s are still around. Some of them are ghost towns now, others are growing and vibrant.
<QUOTE>"As for dealing with whatever crime there is on Mars (which should be greatly minimized by extensive psychological screening and *fair and equal* treatment of each and every member of the new settlement) I think there will be basically two choices for dealing with offenders: exile back to Earth and drugs. Exile would probably be used for capital offenders, such as murder, and treatment by mind-altering drugs be used for lesser crimes, such as theft or hitting another person.</QUOTE>
Extensive psychological screening is a good idea for the settlers, but I ask you, what about first-generation Martians, the sons & daughters of the settlers? Are you going to screen them prior to birth?
Crime doesn't have to result from unfair treatment. I see the solution of exile being unrealistic as I doubt future colonists would want to let a capital offender get a free ride to earth. There might even be a form of permanent servitude, read slavery, imposed on such criminals.
You feel squeamish about this? Don't do the crime if you don't want to do the time.
I would even suggest giving most Martian criminals hard labor, instead of imprisonment. Of course, you'd have to hire someone to guard them. Why bother spending money on drugs-when you can get someone to construct your public works at a low-cost?
Eventually though, such extreme methods will become unnecessary as the colonies become more secure.
It is my speculation that any future Martian law could be very draconian when compared to anything on Earth. Take violent offenders for instance. The Martian courts might elect to just throw them out ye-olde-airlock, or put them in a state of temporary or permanent servitude.
On a fairly new Martian colony, what would be the best method for dealing with a dangerous violent offender, such as a murderer or a rapist?
"Perhaps it is helpful to think about "doing Mars" as being rather like the senior prom."
You know how much I spent to go to my senior prom? $125 all together. Was it a good prom? Yep. Of course, my former high school isn't run by the government.
Life ain't like high-school. High-school is a small part of life.
The metaphor is flawed.
It might be best, for all parties considered, to strictly limit the implementation of Artificial Intelligence. You know what happens when you no longer know how something works? Magic.
"A techno-industrial society where human labor is apparent on all levels won't work. Humans will not be building these magical machines."
So what then if we eventually achieve a utopia where all needs are erased? Will we spend our days as artists? No, we will be little better then savages. If the AI runs everything, why bother learning at all? Why bother exploring the universe? Why gaze up at the stars? You can see the same thing at the movies.
Yes our society would benefit all those involved-yet what would then drive us?
Someone once said, "Sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
So many people speak of planning Mars before the colonists even get there...Feh. Let the colonists set it up themselves without us intervening. After all, they will know how to best deal with any problems.
Planning out their cities, and lives, might generate some natural resentment towards us arrogant Terrans.
Beyond planning the methods by which the colonists may physically survive, is it realistic to think that we may sit here and plan out their existence?
Let the government-beyond an original colonist-signed charter or three, and economy of Mars develop by themselves. The more interesting thing to discuss will be what the -outcome- of Martian government and economics will be.