You are not logged in.
Here are some ideas for Earth ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_shade
... Venus will be in the same ballpark.
Using concentrating optics to get 500 suns on high end cells is routine. Current research is trying for 1000 suns. Keeping everything cool is the limiting factor. Apparently, you shorten the life of most cells over 250 suns.
does anyone have info on my neutron source?
After a quick scan it seems that electron-proton fusion occurs only at the heart of a Type II Supernova. So you might want to look at alternative neutron sources.
it would be like a fission fragment rocket
Oh thanks, I hadn't seen that design.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fission-fragment_rocket
Very interesting.
the neutron source is basically a small particle accellerator (~1 MeV)
Hmmm, I'm not seeing your idea among existing neutron sources ...
Hello, anyone there? Would it work or not?
In theory, but tormac fusion works in theory.
What will you do with all the energy it generates? How will it be a rocket and not a bomb?
How heavy does the neutron source have to be? Will it really be efficient enough to generate more energy than it uses?
When the neutrons hit stuff other than the Li, it will produce radioactive stuff. How bad would this problem be? Will you be able to have a crew?
It's cool that you're thinking beyond chemical energy
when you oxidize ("burn") solid aluminum, it forms a layer of tough, unreactive aluminum oxide ("alumina") that adheres strongly to the surface. This coating won't burn nor come off, and it prevents more aluminum metal under it from oxidizing.
There's been some interesting work with aluminum alloys to try and prevent this effect for hydrogen generation ...
Generating hydrogen by pouring water onto an aluminum alloy
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5402
... I wonder if it could be helpful here?
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 … 100724.htm
...
The magnetism of these nanoparticles is a permanent one (like iron) which, even at ambient temperature, is quite significant. This amazing behaviour has been obtained not just with gold (a phenomenon which had already been put forward as experimentally possible) but, in this research, nanoparticles of silver and copper (the atoms of which are intrinsically non-magnetic) with a size of 2 nm (0.000002 mm) have also been shown to be magnetic at ambient temperature.
...
This discovery goes beyond the mere fact of converting non-magnetic elements to magnetic ones. These properties appear in smaller-sized particles that have never been seen in classical magnetic elements. In fact, they can be considered as the smallest magnets ever obtained. Moreover, such properties do not occur only at low temperatures but they are conserved, apparently without any degradation, at temperatures well above the ambient ones.
...
Oh, and is it possible for a mod to change his signature so it doesn't have blank period lines and big red multi-exclamation mark insane-self-aggrandizement?
Only an Admin can mess with profiles.
Perhaps gaetanomarano will do this voluntarily in the interests of international harmony.
If he does, you guys should also cut him a break - not on technical points - but there's this whole "freedom of speech" thing that we try to be kinda generous with, yes?
thx noosfractal that's real interesting.
Thanks to Midoshi! I'm sure he's already trying to convince a bunch of people to live in a high CO2 environment in order to get better data
Perhaps a insignificant question but Mars today has a 95%CO2 3%N2 atmosphere, Venus has a 96.5%CO2 and 3.5%N2 atmosphere.
With the exception of density they're pretty much the same. Is there some little rule in this or just coincidence?
A very good question actually. Current speculation is that the atmospheres of Venus, Earth and Mars started similarly (they were born from the same primordial gas cloud, after all), but that Earth's is so different after these billions of years because of Earth's magnetic field (Venus and Mars both lack a significant magnetic field).
The incredibly well researched ...
An upper limit to tolerable CO2 levels by Midoshi
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=105214#105214
Ultimately, we can state with confidence a conservative lower estimate of 120 mbar for the limit of safe CO2 partial pressure. This raises the possibility that CO2 might actually be used as a significant buffer gas in terraformation.
Sorry I'm new here. Do you have a previous post discussing the effects of blood acidosis (CO2 poising).
I've have the ID that anything above 1000 partspermillion of CO2 in the atmosphere mixture will have serious health effects if breathed over a lifetherm
Here you go dunwich ...
http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=105214#105214
... it is just a little earlier in this thread.
The post is by Midoshi
But we can't
Tajmar rules out his own result in his latest paper ...
Search for Frame-Dragging in the Vicinity of Spinning Superconductors
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0707.3806He finds something else, but it is hyperweird ( signal when rotating clockwise but not counter-clockwise - WTF? ).
Blah.
But it was enough to apply for a patent for a "Gravitational Field Generator" ...
http://science.orf.at/science/news/150722 (in German)
... or has he found more since?
The article says Aerospace Corp. is working on something similar.
It seems also that EarthTech is seriously trying to replicate Tajmar's experiment ...
http://www.earthtech.org/experiments/tajmar/
Welcome to newmars dunwich.
Thank you for the image. It is fun to imagine.
Please forgive Terraformer's rudeness. He is a child.
Thanks cIclops, you rock!
There are a lot of interesting concepts based around this idea ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beam-powered_propulsion
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_propulsion
... the main problem is that you can't beam enough energy to launch large payloads. In particular, manned mission sized payloads would be difficult. Also, most designs require high acceleration - another difficulty for manned missions.
any situation in which information can be transmited FTL, the possibility for a closed-time-curve exists, (indeed it _MUST_ exists for some frame of reference).
I don't think _must_ is right. Say you create a wormhole with two mouths close together (i.e., ~ Planck wavelength) and then move them apart. The acceleration induces a timeshift, but as long as you don't move them back together, you won't make a CTC.
This is simplistic of course, since timeshift is created, for example, just by being at different "heights" in a gravity field, and you can get a CTC if you have ongoing timeshift with no relative motion - but there seem to be situations where the motion of the mouths can compensate for the timeshift. It may even be that chronology protection prevents other sorts of movement (who'da'guessed there was an ultimate speed?).
At least, that is my understanding from ease-dropping on physicists discussing this guy ...
Matt Visser, From wormhole to time machine: Comments on Hawking’s Chronology Protection Conjecture
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/hep-th/pdf/9202/9202090v2.pdf
My question is why are we looking for carbon based, water drinking life?
The problem is that this is the only example we have, and even if scientists privately allow their imaginations to run wild, if you are trying to convince Bureaucrat Alpha at the Committee for Spending Taxpayer's Money on Science that it is worth closely examining the gravitational resonances of the moons of Jupiter for self-replication and patterns of consciousness, you are going to lose out to someone who says "how 'bout we look for liquid water instead since all life we know of needs that?"
The paper referenced by the article says 7.7 billion until the peak of the red giant phase, 3 billion until the Sun swallows the Earth, and 1 billion until the Sun grows bright enough to boil Earth's oceans.
After the red giant phase the Sun will cool to a white dwarf, which can probably be thought of as its death.
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/31 … red-giant/
Over the next 7 billion years the habitable zone of the solar system will slowly shift from 0.95-1.4 AU out to 50-70 AU, visiting each planet in turn.
Hey that's really cool. I hope you get funded and are able to generate lots of negative energy for us 8)
Thank you for posting that. That is completely awesome.
More concept sketches (are they still sketches if they are computer generated?) ...
http://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=511231
warning: the images are quite large.
...
Three high school students from Wisconsin discovered an asteroid while doing an astronomical observation project for a class in school. Connor Leipold, Tim Patika, and Kyle Simpson of The Prairie School near Racine were notified this week by the Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Massachusetts that the object they discovered has been verified as an asteroid.
The students will have the opportunity to name the asteroid, temporarily designated as 2008 AZ28. They spotted the asteroid through telescopes located in New Mexico that operate remotely via the internet.
...
http://www.universetoday.com/2008/01/17 … -asteroid/
How cool is that.
Some general info ...
That makes it quite a bit easier than I thought.
Well the ITER project is going to spend $US 15 billion to try and make it happen, so it's probably not as easy as you think.
I could be wrong, but if you could contain a dense cloud of electrons/protons or ions in a plastic/ rubber container, that would cost nothing to maintain, but would have a very strong mag. field. I don't get why I havent seen this before. Is it impractical?
To create a magnetic field, you need a _changing_ electric field, for example, produced by a moving charge. This is the idea behind the electromagnet ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnet
... the ability merely to store charge is provided by batteries or capacitors (which is more like your idea) ...