You are not logged in.
http://www.lewisbamboo.com/cold-hardy-bamboo.html
http://www.bamboogrove.com/bamboo-paper.html
http://www.google.com/search?q=paper+fr … d=0CHAQsAQ
It would be nice if it was even more cold tollerant, but I am sure a greenhouse which limits it's coldest climate to that of an Iowa winter is possible on Mars.
I have always wondered how people would be able to maintain hygene on Mars without sanitary paper, such as kleenex, paper towel, and so on. And I don't think people who fly space ships would want to be doing the right hand left hand thing.
Paper from bamboo.
I also mention bamboo or other plants as evaporators. Water with grey or even worse water, and then let them eveporate more or less clean vapors into the greenhouse air, and then condense reasonably clean water using the Martian cold nights.
Obviously this is a case where Mars is way ahead of the Moon as a place to do it. So, less reason to divert to the Moon.
I think I am seeing your particular drift. I would really like to see your plan when it emerges because I will bet it will be practicle or almost there. And no it would not require rotons unless they are truely worth including.
Well, I am not with the dream police, so I will not take you in for further questioning. ![]()
I am wondering why I can't speculate on dwarf and almost dwarf planets? Rotating pressurized habitats in geo synch orbit? Am I an apostate? Space elivators on the smallest mock up of Earth or Mars to test the concepts, is this wrong? It's not like I am spending any ones money thinking about it.
If you wanted, I could tell you how to have artificial gravitation inside of a location on or inside of that little world. However, I just wanted to keep things simple and return to the basics, and see where the thought process ended up. I confess, that this particular thread does stretch the concept of terraforming a large amount, but of course I finally added the bit about hollow spaces inside the little world. All the way down and hollow planet? Well, yeah, that's way beyond my original conception, but maybe finding out specifically why it is not a prefered plan is as good information as finding out what is a good plan.
I've been around a while, and spinning habitats in the asteroid belt, and indeed hollow asteroids are not new and rejectable ideas. Given a choice, if I thought I could help to establish a population on Mars and that they would not die out like Greenland, that would be where my efforts would stay. However, we are not in that pinch at this time.
I think that there are plenty of wild ideas in this section "Terraforming", and that actually other than the drill to the core part, my asperations are rather modest and fairly practicle compaired to the average.
But I can take it. And to keep the piece, I can also behave.
Well, mining is OK, but there are other places.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4_Vesta
With a rotation of 5+ hours and such a low gravitation, I am thinking easy space elivator. Learn how to do it at Vesta, then see if you can do it at Mars.
I am also thinking hollow spinning habitats in orbit for 1/6, 1/3, 1/2, 1 gee as may work.
I am thinking further experiments with various things.
An outpost as I said for perhaps 5000 people. Research in methods.
In fact there may not be enough water. Importing may or may not be worthwhile.
Perpaps from such an asteroids spinning habitats could be built, and then they could move over to Ceres to pick up Water and other things such as Ammonia (Nitrogen), then load up with people, then out to the Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto and so on.
I am just investigating the potential value or lack of value to the idea. I havn't come to a conclusion.
I guess value would be relative.
Another use of course would be mining where perhaps Mars would want to import materials. Although it has Phobos and Demos, a person cannot be sure of what their orbital ambitions for construction might be.
Anyway, I am also willing to forget the idea, but not until examined.
It might be possible that the center could be hollowed out some day and made into a habitat with artificial gravitation machines inside of it (Spinning habitats). But that's way out there.
Other locations;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2_Pallas
may prove more useful, but for now, we have some significant data on the nature of Vesta, so I will think about what could be done with it.
Maybe some star systems only have little worlds like Vesta, and some comets. Very long term being able to habitate such a star system might be useful to humans.
Well, I have been given information both to the negative of what I suggested, and also concepts also suggested.
Might I suggest, that instead of an inverted cone, a net shaped like a badmitton "Birdie". I guess without a roton, you could try to make it rigid, but that makes me wonder how it is stowed and deployed.
With a roton, it could drag behind in the shadow, but be spun to expand outside of the shadow.
To avoid burning up, then not deployed until, speeds are less than 1/2 mile per second? I don't know how bad the heating is then. I am also decending into archaic units from your point of view, but it is comfort from mine.
Anyway with a roton, this could be controllable. (Maybe) You could spin it into the air flow to the degree that you dared, and let it be swept back into the air stream shadow, to make sure the descilleration rate is comfortable, and the heating is not excessive.
A spinning net should be deployable, and also yield more drag for the amount of device mass than a continuous cone of material. It may shed heat better also, provided it is not pushed into the air stream too harsly. When you get rid of it I don't know. Maybe when it is possible to depoy a parachute. I am inclined to wonder if retaining the roton engines would make sense however all the way down, since they could assist on the landing, and they are already paid for. However, then the parachute and net would have to ride in a compartment mounted on the rear of the roton. How much love a parachute would have for a spining roton, I don't know not much I am guessing. Maybe the roton could run with the net. The roton would shut off, and the net being ejected would pull the parachute out. When the parachute was ejected the roton could start up again for the final landing.
Again I know you guys are levels more practiced and I will not continue beyond the point where I can reasonably speculate on these things.
Well, I guess I will take the bait and risk a beating.
I suggest the use of a carbon nano-tube ribbon, in conjunction with a roton on the nose of the entry vehicle. If carbon-nanotubes are so strong, then how about a strong Ribbon/Flag (But a long one)
I know that rotons have outlived their welcome, but in this case, I am not so much suggesting helicoptering down to a landing with a roton, but using the combination of roton and ribbon, to slow the craft down for the next event, which could be a parchute and thrusters, or just thrusters, and maybe with the assistance of the roton.
I see the roton as starting the slowdown by largely thrusting perpendicular (With canting allowed) to expand the trailing vacuum bubble. This might help to slow the
craft down.
Then from the roton arms, from a compartment in the roton arms a ribbon deployed and allowed to trail the craft. The twisting motion of the roton on the base of the
ribbon being expected to cause it to form a helical 3D presentation to the stream of atmosphere around it.
I do fear flapping like a flag, which although that flapping might convert spacecraft momentum to sound waves and heat, it might also tear the machine apart.
Anyway that is why I involked the roton twisting, to try to counterbalance the twisting force with the linear force of the atmospheric stream to cause a flexible ribbon
to have a 3D profile while making a high speed entry to the atmosphere. I presume that this happens after the maximum heating event on the heat sheild of the craft.
Anyway at the upper end of the ribbon could be a container, which woud block the air stream, and help to keep the ribbon strait and not flapping. In that compartment could be a baloon or parachute as you might like, or a thruster pack.
If it were a thruster pack, then the ribbon would remain attached to the craft all the way down, and that thruster pack way above on the ribbon would fire to keep theribbon erect and could also assist in the final landing.
Alternatelly after the ribbon and roton had slowed the craft sufficiently, they would be ejected and a parchute deployed, and finally thrusters as normal from the
bottom of the craft.
Please remember that I am way out of my normal area of thinking here, and we were asked for ideas.
Obviously a cloth ribbon of carbon-nanotubes makes me think it would be about as strong as a ribbon could be, but I am just guessing.
Yes, if you want that concept, it could be persued, but it seems to be more the end of a story about Vesta, rather than a beginning.
I am reading how hard it seems to be to land significant materials on Mars due to the fact that it has a thin atmosphere and it would almost be better if it had none.
So, I am looking at Vesta, and thinking that in fact for somewhat round worlds, it would not be likely to find an easier one to land supplies on.
Getthing there would be harder, but with patience and electric rockets, the materials could be dropped there, and when sufficiency was confirmed, a crewed vehicle could go, either a cycling spaceship, or a very fast nuclear/plasma device.
This all presumes that the dry Vesta is not totally dry, that there is some water ice.
So, I am thinking a research station/mining station/outpost the the outer solar system. Maybe maxing out at 5000 people Plus a gene bank, in case of a social collapse of the whole solar system. Maybe a component of a solarsystem wide radio telescope?
Experiments in surface mining, Mass driver launching of ore, Space elivators, and perhaps trying to drill down to the core of that little world and get to the heavy metals.
Of course it is also possible that a shattered core exists in the asteroid belt with all the heavy metals desired.
Anyway, the fun is in imagining walking about in your counterpressure suit, and building stuff, and robots to help you.
Just the opposite of the wet world stuff I have usually concerned myself with.
I am getting a bit Sci-Fi, in the old fashion sense. It's kind of fun.
I am not knocking the way you see things, I am just after something else. Perhaps the adventure, or the thought of it.
I bought a Discover magazine today, and read an article, "The Clouds are Alive". The point in the article is that it seems that microorganisms high up, almost to conditions resembling Mars, and also in the clouds, serve as a catalist to freeze supercooled water.
The organisms would have to put up with UV, as this article indicates some of these organisms do. I expect that Mars will be even harsher than our statosphere.
I am not so sure that I would believe that such organisms would be active at all or very common at least under the present conditions, except as dormant in the ice under the soil, which apparently results from snows a long time ago.
However there is fossel snow fall apparently from some thousands of years ago, when apparently the planet had a different climate. The atmosphere might have been more hospitable to life, and even the surface.
I have recently read that Mars apparently has had a drought for 600 million years, by the evidence of lack of clay particles in the soil.
So the snowy times if they reoccur could not involve very extensive water melt. However it is not out of the question that damp soil here and there would occur.
Then the organisms swept up in the wind, would assist the formation of snowfall to favor the survival of their own kind.
From time to time, Meteors impact and there is ice exposed.
So, if these organisms were in that snow, perhaps that is the place to send a probe to investigate. Either to thaw and recreate a presumed environment, and look for the organisms, or to use some other method.
I don't know if such a periodic ecosystem did exist, or if the snowfall that is in evidence was a recent one time fluke. However, evidence in the permafrost of Siberia and Antarctica suggests that the organisms could survive for the thousands of years between episodes, in a dormant state.
So that environment might involve a atmospheric pressure of 11 mb, and snowfalls moving from the poles to the equator, and back from the equator to the poles. During the peak of the shift, perhaps the organisms in the atmosphere would seed snow, and on occasion solar energy would reward them by making the dirty snowbanks moist with just a bit of melt water.
If the skill for causing frost existed in any such Martian life.
I bought a Discover magazine today, and read an article, "The Clouds are Alive". The point in the article is that it seems that microorganisms high up, almost to conditions resembling Mars, and also in the clouds, serve as a catalist to freeze supercooled water.
So, in a different way it might after all be possible that a microorganism could alter Venus. The rain and snow patterns. I presume that it does rain and perhaps snow in the atmosphere of Venus in some circumstances.
I don't know what value the alteration would have however.
The organisms would have to put up with UV, as this article indicates some of these organisms do. I also have reservations on the existance of a place in the atmospheric column where the organisms would not be burned up by Sulphuric Acid. I do recall that Sulphuric Acid is an Oxidant. If in very diluted conditions, it could actually be used by an organism in place of Oxygen perhaps. Not sure.
Anyway something to think about.
Curiously, if there were already such an organism in the atmosphere of Venus, and it could cause supercooled water to freeze and precipitate, then this could be detected from orbit. Precipiation would occur at a higher temperature than would be expected if there were no such particles/organsms.
I seems that there could be some water on Vesta, which makes it very interesting to me.
http://dawn.jpl.nasa.gov/feature_storie … _vesta.asp
Vesta is small and rocky and has a deep hole blasted into one pole I believe, exposing very deep rocks which may or may not expose valuable minerals.
I will drop my usual notions about ice covered lakes and so on. I have already exhaused that and am not so interested anymore. (It is a good strategy for the outer solar system though). Instead, I am interested in a place where certain "Pilot" projects could be implemented. Ceres is going to be interesting, but really probabbly too much ice overburden, to make mining pay.
#1 being a space elevator. I don't think it could get much easier than Vesta, and still be dealing with a object resembling a planet.
In this case, I am not intending to entertain wild notions about terraformation. I posted here because this location has a post about Ceres, and because I do not want to fill up the more serious catagoies with wild specualtations which might detract from the focus on Mars. "Modest intentions" is really not true, if the things I have said were actually done, that would be super ambitious. However, modest in the sense of ambitions equivalent to current speculations for the Moon or Mars, things that might actually be possible with our abilities + a great effort to expand those abilities.
If there were a space elevator, then I guess I will go conventional and presume rotating space stations in geosynchronous orbit over Vesta, for a simulation of normal Earth or Mars or Lunar graviation, whichever is prefered.
On Vesta itself, perhaps solar energy farms, mines. Most likely open pit mines.
I have been told that counterpressure suits are such a wonderful option, that I suppose that other than the cold and greater radiation risk, they should be just fine on Vesta.
I wonder if unpressurized "Sky Scrapers" with steel structure, and stone "Curtain walls" would be a good option, providing moderated temperatures within, and also, some radiation protection. (I would presume that small sections would be pressurized, and given greater radiation protection).
The whole notion being I suppose that materials of value could be extracted and shipped to Earth/Moon, or Mars/Phobos/Demos, to purchace items of value to people living in a Vesta location.
But I wonder how hard it is to get to Vesta.
Anyway, I am wondering if it would be worth it, where the Space Elevator would be first implemented there, for reason of ease, and from there, perhaps tried on Mars some distant time later, and then finally Earth.
Perhaps they will instead be of great honor, and remeber what matters, the fact to good people have to sacrifice pride often to make their dreams come true.
I agree, to the limits of Chaos, it is best to explore options and keep them available, since modification/adaption plans for human presence on Mars are in their very early days
One thing I am beginning to have greater awareness of is a time period division. 1) When tools and materials used are dominantly those carried from Earth/Moon and/or (Earth/Moon)/(Phobos/Demos). 2) when tools and materials are dominantly those produced on the surface of Mars.
So the tool kit for the first minute on Mars is one thing.
The tool kit for the first hour is another.
The tool kit for the first day,
The first week,
The first Month,
The first Year,
The first Decade,
The first Century,
and beyond.
So, each need has it's own options, some have been considered and some still need to be "Discovered".
I think that sometimes confilict comes from two or more people thinking of solutions for different time scales.
They can both be right, but might still confilict, not understanding the time scale intended by the other.
Yes, I hope Musk is all what he seems, he has to be something else already to have achieved what he has. Let's hope is that good still, and even better.
Someone posted a reply! Wait, it's me. ![]()
Anyway, Mushrooms and fish.
Mushrooms:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mushroom
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_fungi_eat
While Mushrooms do have some food value, it is my opinion that tinkering with them might allow them to also accumulate other food factors. Genetic tinkering I would think. For instance they should have no need for Muscle protein, but what if they could be caused to accumulate it in the "Fruits". (The thing we generally call the Mushroom). What about Carbohydrates and Fats and other vitimens that are not normal for a mushroom?
It might be OK for the Mushrooms so altered to do this if humans provide them with a very rich diet. I don't know how Formic Acid would play into it, but I am going to suppose that if you had a soil and injected it, and had a variant of the bacteria which has been described, but one which simply makes bacteria from energy, not Alcohols, I expect that the mushrooms would live on that, the dead of the bacteria.
So, this is a very low maintenance livestock, mushrooms. Have a pressurized moist dark place with Oxygen and a chemical energy source suitable, then have specially adapted Mushrooms, then have a farm.
Caves, Buildings on the surface (Since it is not likely that on Mars, toxic forms of Mushrooms would contaminate your "Farm".
I feel that it would be both efficient and moral. Mushrooms do not waste energy heating themselves like mammals we use for food, and they do not move about, and they do not need light. Just appropriate chemicals, and symbiotic Microorganisms. And when you pick a mushroom, you are not really killing the creature, it mostly lives in the soil. You are only taking the fruit.
As for fish, that a bit lower on the morality pyramid, still, we eat fish here, fish are cold blooded, (Except perhaps Tuna and Sharks and maybe some others). So they don't waste boilogical energy on body heat. They do swim, but in some cases this would not be a very active behavior, so they would not waste energy swimming around too much. Most likely their food would be a bacteria which would feed on the produced Formic Acid of the articles in the previous post.
And in the previous post where the mention of produced alcohol exists, obviously that coupled with an Oxygen supply implies Internal Combustion Engines, and Fuel Cells.
Hurray!
Well perhaps dust is not a normal issue except during global dust storms.
Anyway I like the solar collectors you presented inside of or outside of an enclosure.
As for the side process, that can also occur without the solar colectors in it's greenhouse or with them in.
These are options, and a mission to Mars is long away from now.
I am pasteing some information here which I think has potential for Mars but was not originally intended for Mars it would seem.
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-mic … -fuel.html
Quote from the article::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Photosynthesis is the process of converting light energy to chemical energy and storing it in the bonds of sugar. There are two parts to photosynthesis -- a light reaction and a dark reaction. The light reaction converts light energy to chemical energy and must take place in the light. The dark reaction, which converts CO2 to sugar, doesn't directly need light to occur.
"We've been able to separate the light reaction from the dark reaction and instead of using biological photosynthesis, we are using solar panels to convert the sunlight to electrical energy, then to a chemical intermediate, and using that to power carbon dioxide fixation to produce the fuel," Liao said. "This method could be more efficient than the biological system."
Liao explained that with biological systems, the plants used require large areas of agricultural land. However, because Liao's method does not require the light and dark reactions to take place together, solar panels, for example, can be built in the desert or on rooftops.
Theoretically, the hydrogen generated by solar electricity can drive CO2 conversion in lithoautotrophic microorganisms engineered to synthesize high-energy density liquid fuels. But the low solubility, low mass-transfer rate and the safety issues surrounding hydrogen limit the efficiency and scalability of such processes. Instead Liao's team found formic acid to be a favorable substitute and efficient energy carrier.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
I am not totally sure, but I am guessing that they care generating O2 and formic acid with solar electricity, and if this is not wrong, it might be easier than creating O2 and H2. They also only mention C02, but I am sure H20 is needed in the process.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formic_acid
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 … 171607.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithoautotroph
http://microbewiki.kenyon.edu/index.php … a_eutropha
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralstonia_eutropha
While I am not saying that greenhouses with plants could not be used, this process might be useful for the production of bulk indistrial materials, and to manufacture a "Fish Food" of sorts, to feed fish with of course, fish in tanks.
And it is also very likely that fungi (Mushrooms) could subsist upon a soil where such substances were injected. They can grow on soils where oil spills have poluted the ground, and incedently they clean the soil up.
Thats a good one. My only concern is keeping the more complex surface from the accumulation of dust.
To protect from dust, I suggest a greenhouse at near ambient pressures to encase the solar panels. While I am aware that that would deminish the output from the cells, I will suggest a side process that might justify this loss, and turn it into a gain.
In the bottom of the greenhouse a tray which can contain a weak alcohol solution to be evaporated by the collected waste heat.
An electric pump would collect the concentrated alcohol vapors, and force a condensation into metal tubes immersed in water tanks. The water tanks would be used to supply heat for living confort, particularly at night, and perhaps bathing water, or alternately aquariums to grow organisms.
I am going to post an article which suggests where this alcohol might come from.
Thanks for pointing that out. I thought about it and I see merit.
From my point of view, and I say that noone has to agree, but as I see it:
-Greenhouse gasses, and swelled atmospheric column.
-Allowed still is floating habitats, but at a higher altitude, and incidently closer to an orbit, and so more accessable by rocket devices.
-Not forbiden is mining by robots on the surface, but hotter, but any such mining was going to require a whole new type of techonology anyway.
-I also see, that if the L2 point contained a facility, (That is in the shadow of the planet Venus), it might aquire electical power from the solar wind, and might using that power capture some of the atmospheric gasses being swept off of the atmosphere of Venus.
So, there is very little to loose except the planetary platform I suggested. I don't care. I proposed that just to try to be helpful. From the start, I was very concerned about how it would deal with Hurricaine winds anyway.
I like this new idea from others much better. (I did try to add something). Also, for those of you who lack the nice
but I won't waste my time on it. Your loss actually.
I suppose the little tiny brainchip human replica's and the notion of interstellar travel where out there. Actually I was hopeing for an explaination of why this should not be done if it could be done.
I spoke of Lions. In my view, the human race has exceded limits which have defined it's nature, and so like people who have an abundant food supply and no self control, unsightly consequences are possible and even likely.
The question is manipulation or adaptation. I will confess, I lean towards a compromise of both, where most people here are all about manipulation, or mechanical adaptation. However, if biology is a machine, that that is also mechanical adaptions.
To steer towards the topic as you have requested, I would say that at many stars have "Ice Giant Planets". Many free floaters may be out there as well. What to do with them if anything? I think the notion of making them into Earths is not out of the question for very advanced life forms, but very advanced life forms would be what the decendants of humans would be, if the human race has a biological or perhaps even a mechanical continuation.
I would say that the adaptations for Neptune I suggested did include a manipulation, a tether system to collect energy. That would be a starter. Further manipulations would be options. However I was making the point that those doing it are likely to have a altered nature and perhaps altered motivations.
But since you have requested orthydoxy, then I ask if GWJohnson's suggestion about a hemispheric fusion explosion to strip off the atmosphere could be used?
Beyond that I wonder if you could do that, might you indeed make Neptune or Jupiter work like a controlled star. Drop a special type of Fusion bomb into it periodically to induce a fusion flash of the atmosphere or slushy oceans of whatever?
Then couild you construct a dyson sphere around Neptune? (Free orbital eliments, not a big metal shell).
I have thought that perhaps if you did put a dyson sphere around Ice Giants or Gas Giants, perhaps the infared light reflecting back would raise the atmospheric temperature and cause the to glow at a shorter wavelength. If we cold see down in the lower layers, I am sure it would glow in visible light.
Still I am not sure what that gets you.
However this is sort of a way to Soliform Neptune, not Terraform it. I'm sorry.
The gravitation not being that much greater than Earth, and the spin being more (I believe) could it happen that a space elivator could give access to the thicker atmosphere, and that useful slushy materials from the deep down hot could be extracted and brought up to that space elivator, and moved to orbit, to construct a whatever, leaving behind a gass ball like Saturn?
Or just the reverse, could a process turn Neptune into a binary planet, one a gas runt, and the other a terrestrial? Perhaps starting with a fusion kaboom, and blowing knot of gas into orbit of Neptune, and if it would condense into a gas midget, then repeat the process? Then the Hydrogen would be available for future use for energy production.
Anyway, perhaps that puts you closer to where you want the thread to be. My appologies for the earlier deviation.
Well on that part at least you have some grounds for complaint.
However, I am working towards the notion that the human race by doing what I described will no longer need an Oxygen atmosphere. That would be big for star travel, since few if any habitable planets without life will have Oxygen atmopsheres. Further, if by having a host body, you could extend your life span by 300-1000 years, the time to travel between stars at a reasonable speed becomes possible to do.
If you could have another part of your body that you could plug into that could do a detailed diagonostic on your body, and make detailed repairs to it, see cancer cell by cell, and destroy it, that might help you change your mind.
It is a radical idea. One form of it I thought of was a very large transparent jar to put the human remains in and also the host. Another transparent jar could surround that. That whole thing would be in a metal container. Inside the metal container would be light emitting devices to "Feed" the host.
As far as awareness, that would be in virtual reality, and perhaps a robotic avatar.
So the only part of the ship that has to be kept at temperate temperatures would be inside the Jar. So, a starship would be at a very low energy budget. And it's interior would not be pressurized with an atmosphre.
A further but a bit creepy addition would be humanoid tiny avatars. No biological brain, just a brain chip and an internal antenna. These could be replaca's of humans, but at a very small scale. Normally run by a computer sustem until a Jar person wanted to log on to them. To avoid ethical concerns, the little avatars would not be composed of human cells, but some other animals cells. They would be useful for doing tiny work. Perhaps a tiny space in a starship would be pressurized with Oxygen, and they would be there. Keep in mind these creatures would not be any more concious than your laptop computer.
I told you this one was weird.
However it might be more real than virtual reality.
So, these jar people might be crossing the gap between stars for 100 years, and be at virtual parties, and the beach and so on. All the while not really requiring the expense account that such activites normally require.
As for old folks, if you gave them the choice between a coffin, or such a rebuild, some would choose the rebuild.
In my opinion the Earth should be left to the current generation to use, and the old people should move out to the planets.
Just an opionion. I have serious doulbts that humans will actually ever get their dirty diapers changed let alone go to the stars, but one can hope.
I want to participate, but it will be weird. Just warning you.
One thing that is noticible is that most of the time when we speculate on the future, we leave out the probabable part where the humans change into something else.
Cyborg seems the most likely, so I will include that.
Supposing that the biological mush that composes our bodies and brains is to be kept alive by extrordinary methods. Then there must be vastly expanded places to put people, and they must be provided at an economical cost, but to be moral in on sense the quality of life must be good.
So, for big planets, I propose that a human upon becomming very old, might have a modified biological body, one with the purpose of surviving in zero gee, and also for supporting itself off of sunlight power. The body designed to run down deer, and escape from lions would be set aside.
An organic "Host" would be manufactured. It would perhaps be created in part from the subjects own cell lines. However photosynthis, or the ability to digest Hydrogen would be added. The host would be very large.
The subject might exist in the following ways.
Case 1 -It could be entirely inside of the host, and needing no bones. No calcium to loose. The wole thing in a canister, the canister inside of a big "Transformer Robot". I don't think it could be a car or a truck though.
Case 2 -It could be like a human body, but with bones replaced by artificial bones attachment to the host would be with an umbilicle, and this might limit mobility, unless the host moves with you.
Case 3 -It could be a detachable human like body, with a real human referbished brain, and would share blood with the host. As disgusting as this might seem to others, drinking blood from the host, and the returning the blood to the host, is more moral than eating other organisms in my opinion. I only say blood, because it would be a fluid containing hemoglobin. Oxygen being the need to satisfy. Many things would be modified. No bowels, no feces. No urine. Just the exchange of fluid.
The host would of course recycle the materials passed back to it, producing sugars and so on. This organism would be eaten by lions if their were lions in orbit of Neptune, but since the predator prey relationship we had in the past is gone, the shape of us may change.
So to power this, either solar concentrators, or tethers dipping into the atmosphere of Neptune. The tethers, orbital motion would be a compromise between Magnetic field, and the motion of the atmosphere. If the teather was part of a bigger system of a ring circling the entire planet geosynchronis, (Very big and star treck), it could conduct electricty from one part of the atmopshere to another, using the power. It also could have windmills within the atmophere, perahaps Nano-Windmills on the tethers. At the bottom ends of the tethers, substances in the atmosphere could be collected, and conveyed upwards to the orbital ring. The needed products to conduct Fusion for instance.
So, not enough room on Earth for all the "People" living to be 300 years old? Send them to orbit Neptune and other places.
Then some very bazarr inventions are needed to produce avatars that can function in whatever lies below. That is if that can be done and has value.
So, a "Human" could have various avenues of mobility in orbit, and could also perhaps have an avatar deep down in Neptune. However machines to do that would be completely different. They would opperate in a much different way with different physical properties than anything we currently do.
Make it into an Earth? Well go star treck go, but once the human race changes into something else, that is not needed.
Even though it appears that current thinking I see implies that Phobos and Demos do not so much fit into plans for a vist to Mars or a settlement of Mars, if there is no objection I wish to catalog a notion I had some time ago about working in a zero gee evironment in proximity of a airless little world. (Phobos, Demos, Asteroids, and so on).
This notion supposes that their could be some economic gain by manipulation of the materials of Phobos and/or Demos, and that this could be of assistance in the visiting or settling of Mars.
1) The outer sphere, would have solar cells on its outer surface, and entry doors and I suppose communication and observation devices, and I suppose places to dock spacecraft. The outer sphere defines the size of the object also.
2) The inner sphere is there to provide a fulcrum for mobile devices which can navagate the "Channel" defined by the space between the outer sphere and the inner sphere.
Those mobile devices would perhaps but not necessarily be like a disc with one convex and one concave side.
Humans would live inside of these mobile disks. The disks could rotate on their axis. They could also move within the channel using either tires which grip the inside of the outer wall or the outside of the inner wall and probabbly both. Or maglev methods could be used to inductively "Motor" about.
I expect that the "Channel" will not be pressurized, but the mobile disks will be. They could have a volume as small as a space capsule or as big as a house. 1, 2, or more persons could be inside of one. Think of it as a multiperson pressure suit. Hosting prolonged life support including the handling of human waste products, either directly recycling inside, or storing for a futher action outside. The disks would also have some radiation protection. Perhaps normal throughout the disk, and perhaps a "Storm shelter" for the bedrooms.
Electrical power would be supplied by motor brushes. The outside sphere could be at one electrical potential, and the inside at another electrical potential, and each sphere would be a current carrying device. So the disks would have plenty of power as long as the spheres were electrified.
The circumferance of the disks would include robotic arms. As I said, the disks would have freedom of mobility within the spherical channel, to rotate, and to move to any other unblocked, unoccupied location within the spherical channel.
Two of the disks could work with each other like two or more hands do, or like two or more humans do.
The "Channel" would also be a relatively safe place for a person wearing a counterpressure suit to work as well.
I said that the "Channel" would likely be unpressurized, but it could retain leaked gasses, such as the venting of airlocks on the mobile disks, or the perspiration of a human in a counterpressure suit, and so that material might be recoverable, by a collection device.
Another purpose of the "Spherical Channel" is that it would tend to inhibit tools, and fragments of raw and processed materials from drifiting away into other Martian orbits, becomming "Space Junk".
The channel could also be well lighted, it would serve as a micrometeroite shield, and would have moderated temperatures within.
The space inside of the inner sphere, could serve as a storrage facility to store tools not in use, or bags of soil from Phobos and/or Demos.
Just what economic value added service would be performed, I guess is a thing to figure out. Rocket fuel, I am guessing, but if this was done before the settlement of Mars, then tools and materials could be manufactured, and then landed on the surface.
Anyway that is about it. I think it could work in the "L" locations of the Earth/Moon as well, or even in orbit of the Moon, if it was affordable to give continuous orbital correction for the device.
I like the idea that you can expose a hand, but I am wondering if a compromise could be used to give some of the benefits of being bearhanded, while, risking less a repetive type injury. In other words, I am thinking that repeatedly exposing hands to vacuum has unknown consequences, and I fear a accumulation of injury, and I think that a modified scheme might help.
Since we are generally "Handed", right or left, what if a right handed person, kept the glove on the left hand, using it for gripping only, and what if the right hand glove had open finger tips? I think that the finger tips are the most important tactile feature of the hand. What if in addition the right hand had a second outer glove you could pull over the fingertips from time to time. It could be a counterpressure glove, but it might be easier to slide a pressurized container over that hand with the exposed fingertips to rest the fingertips. Either an Apollo glove, or even a bit funny, a "Captain Hook" type prostesis.
The "Captain Hook" device would be a little canister your right hand could fit into with some type of sealing method. Eather a metal flange scheme, or a torroidal sphincter at the wrist. The canister would be pressurized by a device to compress Martian air into the right hand canister. (You seem to have this person working in a workshop, so a little air compressor is not that far off base). Then inside of the right hand canister would be a mechanical device which would allow the right hand to still do work squeezing the device to actuate a mechanical grip on the front of the canister, much like a person who has a prostesis can.
So in Mode 1: the person would have a left hand fully gloved, and a right hand partially gloved so that they could do tasks where the sense of touch and fingernails might matter. In Mode 2: They would rest their dominant hand inside of the pressurizable canister, but still be able to use the dominant hand to grip things using a prostesis double hook type device.
A modification of this would be to have one finger and thumb exposed, and to keep the other fingers which are mostly for power anyway protected by a partial glove.
This is a segway, but Iron Pentacarbonyl;
A fluid it seems, a fuel perhaps. (Toxic)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_pentacarbonyl
But if a fuel, then can you manufacture it from Phobos and Demos? If so, I would presume that you could also get Oxygen from those two moons. I am thinking that
some of the materials of those moons contain Carbon, and there must be some magnetic Iron.
So, could you power a return to Earth Rocket with a Oxygen/Iron Pentacarbonyl engine? I bet it might be prone to clogging.
However with Mars having a CO2 atomosphere, and Mars, and I presume Phobos and Demos having Iron, and our Moon having Iron and CO, if this could work it would be much better than trying to get Methane off of the surface of Mars for a return trip. Also, such a propulsion system would useful in the asteroid belt.
Still, you are the experts would it be better than getting Methane and Oxygen off of Mars itself?
Not the fastest, agreed.
Not the cheepest? What is? (Real question)
However what they show there is a interesting start to a situation where you don't go from point A to point B by the fastest method or the cheepest method, but it the spaceship is a world of it's own.
Technologies keep changing also, for instance heated graphite mentioned in one of the threads here. I would suppose that that might spew atmospheric gasses.
I wonder, does the existing concept of such propulsion include electric rockets and that efficiency, or advanced robotic resupply ships? Further, if resupply is eventually from other sources than the Earth, does that change the economic balance.
The Moon, Ceres, Vesta, Demos, Phobos, the upper atmosphere of Mars, Callisto.
I'm reaching.
However for civilians cycling spaceships have an advantage.
I am expecting as I think everyone would that the first people who go to Mars will be exceptional people. Physically, with youth, and a good survival sense, and a energy level that can sustain abusive circumstances for a prolonged period.
Later they will be more towards average.
That is exactly good. What is needed in my opionion is a catalog of options, as well as a plan of which to use when. But of course that has to allow some flexability.
I am very happy to learn of other options. Sometimes it takes a while for me to comprehend deeply however. But when I finally do grasp something it is integrated into the catalog, and then when possible linked to other ideas, sometimes with success, and sometimes not so much. Trial and error then.
One little trick I have tried to work on is a greenhouse inside of a greenhouse.
The first one holds a pool of sterile water, because we would not want micro-organisms to grow there and block the light. The first one would be at ambient Martian pressure, but with a significant humidity inside of it. It would frost up inside at night, and then the frost would evaporate (I hope, and condense elswhere on a surface of Ice I hope. It would have a layer of transparent ice inside of it covering a pool of water. However within that pool of water would be a second greenhouse. That second greenhouse might have a layer of air 1 or 2 feet thick (Sorry for the archaic units). And warm water under the air layer. Floating plants, and swimming perhaps. However the two might not be compatable. If you wanted to grow floating plants, then perhaps you would want a column of water and ice 5 to 10 (Or more) feet thick, since you would want the minimum blockage of light. Duckweed is an option, a more cool water plant. However Hyacynth is not out of the question.
Again this is for the circumstances of a plentiful supply of makeup water from local ice.
The plants could be collected and directed to a deeper body of water to feed livestock (Fish, filter feeders).
For swimming, the layer of water in the first greenhouse needs to be deep. Perhaps 32 feet (Sorry again).
The 2nd greenhouse should not be made of glass. Plastic. I believe that glass has poor mechanical properties in water, but very good in a vacuum.
As for the collapsable tunnels you have suggested, I am curious. Can you give details? Or a diagram?
As JoshNH4H suggested or seemed to suggest:
The most valuable greenhouse would be one where ambient pressure could support actual rooted plants. Perhaps in the Hellas Depression at the best pressures avaiable, with a genetically engineered plant? Then as has been suggested we could have plant growth with a simple greenhouse and some moisture to the roots. However the plant would have to tollerate being watered with ice water.
Perhaps other people could come up with a better plan for this.
Perhaps it would be like rice but the water it was in would be ice water. This would help to compensate for the cold nights, if the ice water did not freeze and damage the plants.