You are not logged in.
Thats a good one. My only concern is keeping the more complex surface from the accumulation of dust.
To protect from dust, I suggest a greenhouse at near ambient pressures to encase the solar panels. While I am aware that that would deminish the output from the cells, I will suggest a side process that might justify this loss, and turn it into a gain.
In the bottom of the greenhouse a tray which can contain a weak alcohol solution to be evaporated by the collected waste heat.
An electric pump would collect the concentrated alcohol vapors, and force a condensation into metal tubes immersed in water tanks. The water tanks would be used to supply heat for living confort, particularly at night, and perhaps bathing water, or alternately aquariums to grow organisms.
I am going to post an article which suggests where this alcohol might come from.
Thanks for pointing that out. I thought about it and I see merit.
From my point of view, and I say that noone has to agree, but as I see it:
-Greenhouse gasses, and swelled atmospheric column.
-Allowed still is floating habitats, but at a higher altitude, and incidently closer to an orbit, and so more accessable by rocket devices.
-Not forbiden is mining by robots on the surface, but hotter, but any such mining was going to require a whole new type of techonology anyway.
-I also see, that if the L2 point contained a facility, (That is in the shadow of the planet Venus), it might aquire electical power from the solar wind, and might using that power capture some of the atmospheric gasses being swept off of the atmosphere of Venus.
So, there is very little to loose except the planetary platform I suggested. I don't care. I proposed that just to try to be helpful. From the start, I was very concerned about how it would deal with Hurricaine winds anyway.
I like this new idea from others much better. (I did try to add something). Also, for those of you who lack the nice but I won't waste my time on it. Your loss actually.
I suppose the little tiny brainchip human replica's and the notion of interstellar travel where out there. Actually I was hopeing for an explaination of why this should not be done if it could be done.
I spoke of Lions. In my view, the human race has exceded limits which have defined it's nature, and so like people who have an abundant food supply and no self control, unsightly consequences are possible and even likely.
The question is manipulation or adaptation. I will confess, I lean towards a compromise of both, where most people here are all about manipulation, or mechanical adaptation. However, if biology is a machine, that that is also mechanical adaptions.
To steer towards the topic as you have requested, I would say that at many stars have "Ice Giant Planets". Many free floaters may be out there as well. What to do with them if anything? I think the notion of making them into Earths is not out of the question for very advanced life forms, but very advanced life forms would be what the decendants of humans would be, if the human race has a biological or perhaps even a mechanical continuation.
I would say that the adaptations for Neptune I suggested did include a manipulation, a tether system to collect energy. That would be a starter. Further manipulations would be options. However I was making the point that those doing it are likely to have a altered nature and perhaps altered motivations.
But since you have requested orthydoxy, then I ask if GWJohnson's suggestion about a hemispheric fusion explosion to strip off the atmosphere could be used?
Beyond that I wonder if you could do that, might you indeed make Neptune or Jupiter work like a controlled star. Drop a special type of Fusion bomb into it periodically to induce a fusion flash of the atmosphere or slushy oceans of whatever?
Then couild you construct a dyson sphere around Neptune? (Free orbital eliments, not a big metal shell).
I have thought that perhaps if you did put a dyson sphere around Ice Giants or Gas Giants, perhaps the infared light reflecting back would raise the atmospheric temperature and cause the to glow at a shorter wavelength. If we cold see down in the lower layers, I am sure it would glow in visible light.
Still I am not sure what that gets you.
However this is sort of a way to Soliform Neptune, not Terraform it. I'm sorry.
The gravitation not being that much greater than Earth, and the spin being more (I believe) could it happen that a space elivator could give access to the thicker atmosphere, and that useful slushy materials from the deep down hot could be extracted and brought up to that space elivator, and moved to orbit, to construct a whatever, leaving behind a gass ball like Saturn?
Or just the reverse, could a process turn Neptune into a binary planet, one a gas runt, and the other a terrestrial? Perhaps starting with a fusion kaboom, and blowing knot of gas into orbit of Neptune, and if it would condense into a gas midget, then repeat the process? Then the Hydrogen would be available for future use for energy production.
Anyway, perhaps that puts you closer to where you want the thread to be. My appologies for the earlier deviation.
Well on that part at least you have some grounds for complaint.
However, I am working towards the notion that the human race by doing what I described will no longer need an Oxygen atmosphere. That would be big for star travel, since few if any habitable planets without life will have Oxygen atmopsheres. Further, if by having a host body, you could extend your life span by 300-1000 years, the time to travel between stars at a reasonable speed becomes possible to do.
If you could have another part of your body that you could plug into that could do a detailed diagonostic on your body, and make detailed repairs to it, see cancer cell by cell, and destroy it, that might help you change your mind.
It is a radical idea. One form of it I thought of was a very large transparent jar to put the human remains in and also the host. Another transparent jar could surround that. That whole thing would be in a metal container. Inside the metal container would be light emitting devices to "Feed" the host.
As far as awareness, that would be in virtual reality, and perhaps a robotic avatar.
So the only part of the ship that has to be kept at temperate temperatures would be inside the Jar. So, a starship would be at a very low energy budget. And it's interior would not be pressurized with an atmosphre.
A further but a bit creepy addition would be humanoid tiny avatars. No biological brain, just a brain chip and an internal antenna. These could be replaca's of humans, but at a very small scale. Normally run by a computer sustem until a Jar person wanted to log on to them. To avoid ethical concerns, the little avatars would not be composed of human cells, but some other animals cells. They would be useful for doing tiny work. Perhaps a tiny space in a starship would be pressurized with Oxygen, and they would be there. Keep in mind these creatures would not be any more concious than your laptop computer.
I told you this one was weird.
However it might be more real than virtual reality.
So, these jar people might be crossing the gap between stars for 100 years, and be at virtual parties, and the beach and so on. All the while not really requiring the expense account that such activites normally require.
As for old folks, if you gave them the choice between a coffin, or such a rebuild, some would choose the rebuild.
In my opinion the Earth should be left to the current generation to use, and the old people should move out to the planets.
Just an opionion. I have serious doulbts that humans will actually ever get their dirty diapers changed let alone go to the stars, but one can hope.
I want to participate, but it will be weird. Just warning you.
One thing that is noticible is that most of the time when we speculate on the future, we leave out the probabable part where the humans change into something else.
Cyborg seems the most likely, so I will include that.
Supposing that the biological mush that composes our bodies and brains is to be kept alive by extrordinary methods. Then there must be vastly expanded places to put people, and they must be provided at an economical cost, but to be moral in on sense the quality of life must be good.
So, for big planets, I propose that a human upon becomming very old, might have a modified biological body, one with the purpose of surviving in zero gee, and also for supporting itself off of sunlight power. The body designed to run down deer, and escape from lions would be set aside.
An organic "Host" would be manufactured. It would perhaps be created in part from the subjects own cell lines. However photosynthis, or the ability to digest Hydrogen would be added. The host would be very large.
The subject might exist in the following ways.
Case 1 -It could be entirely inside of the host, and needing no bones. No calcium to loose. The wole thing in a canister, the canister inside of a big "Transformer Robot". I don't think it could be a car or a truck though.
Case 2 -It could be like a human body, but with bones replaced by artificial bones attachment to the host would be with an umbilicle, and this might limit mobility, unless the host moves with you.
Case 3 -It could be a detachable human like body, with a real human referbished brain, and would share blood with the host. As disgusting as this might seem to others, drinking blood from the host, and the returning the blood to the host, is more moral than eating other organisms in my opinion. I only say blood, because it would be a fluid containing hemoglobin. Oxygen being the need to satisfy. Many things would be modified. No bowels, no feces. No urine. Just the exchange of fluid.
The host would of course recycle the materials passed back to it, producing sugars and so on. This organism would be eaten by lions if their were lions in orbit of Neptune, but since the predator prey relationship we had in the past is gone, the shape of us may change.
So to power this, either solar concentrators, or tethers dipping into the atmosphere of Neptune. The tethers, orbital motion would be a compromise between Magnetic field, and the motion of the atmosphere. If the teather was part of a bigger system of a ring circling the entire planet geosynchronis, (Very big and star treck), it could conduct electricty from one part of the atmopshere to another, using the power. It also could have windmills within the atmophere, perahaps Nano-Windmills on the tethers. At the bottom ends of the tethers, substances in the atmosphere could be collected, and conveyed upwards to the orbital ring. The needed products to conduct Fusion for instance.
So, not enough room on Earth for all the "People" living to be 300 years old? Send them to orbit Neptune and other places.
Then some very bazarr inventions are needed to produce avatars that can function in whatever lies below. That is if that can be done and has value.
So, a "Human" could have various avenues of mobility in orbit, and could also perhaps have an avatar deep down in Neptune. However machines to do that would be completely different. They would opperate in a much different way with different physical properties than anything we currently do.
Make it into an Earth? Well go star treck go, but once the human race changes into something else, that is not needed.
Even though it appears that current thinking I see implies that Phobos and Demos do not so much fit into plans for a vist to Mars or a settlement of Mars, if there is no objection I wish to catalog a notion I had some time ago about working in a zero gee evironment in proximity of a airless little world. (Phobos, Demos, Asteroids, and so on).
This notion supposes that their could be some economic gain by manipulation of the materials of Phobos and/or Demos, and that this could be of assistance in the visiting or settling of Mars.
1) The outer sphere, would have solar cells on its outer surface, and entry doors and I suppose communication and observation devices, and I suppose places to dock spacecraft. The outer sphere defines the size of the object also.
2) The inner sphere is there to provide a fulcrum for mobile devices which can navagate the "Channel" defined by the space between the outer sphere and the inner sphere.
Those mobile devices would perhaps but not necessarily be like a disc with one convex and one concave side.
Humans would live inside of these mobile disks. The disks could rotate on their axis. They could also move within the channel using either tires which grip the inside of the outer wall or the outside of the inner wall and probabbly both. Or maglev methods could be used to inductively "Motor" about.
I expect that the "Channel" will not be pressurized, but the mobile disks will be. They could have a volume as small as a space capsule or as big as a house. 1, 2, or more persons could be inside of one. Think of it as a multiperson pressure suit. Hosting prolonged life support including the handling of human waste products, either directly recycling inside, or storing for a futher action outside. The disks would also have some radiation protection. Perhaps normal throughout the disk, and perhaps a "Storm shelter" for the bedrooms.
Electrical power would be supplied by motor brushes. The outside sphere could be at one electrical potential, and the inside at another electrical potential, and each sphere would be a current carrying device. So the disks would have plenty of power as long as the spheres were electrified.
The circumferance of the disks would include robotic arms. As I said, the disks would have freedom of mobility within the spherical channel, to rotate, and to move to any other unblocked, unoccupied location within the spherical channel.
Two of the disks could work with each other like two or more hands do, or like two or more humans do.
The "Channel" would also be a relatively safe place for a person wearing a counterpressure suit to work as well.
I said that the "Channel" would likely be unpressurized, but it could retain leaked gasses, such as the venting of airlocks on the mobile disks, or the perspiration of a human in a counterpressure suit, and so that material might be recoverable, by a collection device.
Another purpose of the "Spherical Channel" is that it would tend to inhibit tools, and fragments of raw and processed materials from drifiting away into other Martian orbits, becomming "Space Junk".
The channel could also be well lighted, it would serve as a micrometeroite shield, and would have moderated temperatures within.
The space inside of the inner sphere, could serve as a storrage facility to store tools not in use, or bags of soil from Phobos and/or Demos.
Just what economic value added service would be performed, I guess is a thing to figure out. Rocket fuel, I am guessing, but if this was done before the settlement of Mars, then tools and materials could be manufactured, and then landed on the surface.
Anyway that is about it. I think it could work in the "L" locations of the Earth/Moon as well, or even in orbit of the Moon, if it was affordable to give continuous orbital correction for the device.
I like the idea that you can expose a hand, but I am wondering if a compromise could be used to give some of the benefits of being bearhanded, while, risking less a repetive type injury. In other words, I am thinking that repeatedly exposing hands to vacuum has unknown consequences, and I fear a accumulation of injury, and I think that a modified scheme might help.
Since we are generally "Handed", right or left, what if a right handed person, kept the glove on the left hand, using it for gripping only, and what if the right hand glove had open finger tips? I think that the finger tips are the most important tactile feature of the hand. What if in addition the right hand had a second outer glove you could pull over the fingertips from time to time. It could be a counterpressure glove, but it might be easier to slide a pressurized container over that hand with the exposed fingertips to rest the fingertips. Either an Apollo glove, or even a bit funny, a "Captain Hook" type prostesis.
The "Captain Hook" device would be a little canister your right hand could fit into with some type of sealing method. Eather a metal flange scheme, or a torroidal sphincter at the wrist. The canister would be pressurized by a device to compress Martian air into the right hand canister. (You seem to have this person working in a workshop, so a little air compressor is not that far off base). Then inside of the right hand canister would be a mechanical device which would allow the right hand to still do work squeezing the device to actuate a mechanical grip on the front of the canister, much like a person who has a prostesis can.
So in Mode 1: the person would have a left hand fully gloved, and a right hand partially gloved so that they could do tasks where the sense of touch and fingernails might matter. In Mode 2: They would rest their dominant hand inside of the pressurizable canister, but still be able to use the dominant hand to grip things using a prostesis double hook type device.
A modification of this would be to have one finger and thumb exposed, and to keep the other fingers which are mostly for power anyway protected by a partial glove.
This is a segway, but Iron Pentacarbonyl;
A fluid it seems, a fuel perhaps. (Toxic)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_pentacarbonyl
But if a fuel, then can you manufacture it from Phobos and Demos? If so, I would presume that you could also get Oxygen from those two moons. I am thinking that
some of the materials of those moons contain Carbon, and there must be some magnetic Iron.
So, could you power a return to Earth Rocket with a Oxygen/Iron Pentacarbonyl engine? I bet it might be prone to clogging.
However with Mars having a CO2 atomosphere, and Mars, and I presume Phobos and Demos having Iron, and our Moon having Iron and CO, if this could work it would be much better than trying to get Methane off of the surface of Mars for a return trip. Also, such a propulsion system would useful in the asteroid belt.
Still, you are the experts would it be better than getting Methane and Oxygen off of Mars itself?
Not the fastest, agreed.
Not the cheepest? What is? (Real question)
However what they show there is a interesting start to a situation where you don't go from point A to point B by the fastest method or the cheepest method, but it the spaceship is a world of it's own.
Technologies keep changing also, for instance heated graphite mentioned in one of the threads here. I would suppose that that might spew atmospheric gasses.
I wonder, does the existing concept of such propulsion include electric rockets and that efficiency, or advanced robotic resupply ships? Further, if resupply is eventually from other sources than the Earth, does that change the economic balance.
The Moon, Ceres, Vesta, Demos, Phobos, the upper atmosphere of Mars, Callisto.
I'm reaching.
However for civilians cycling spaceships have an advantage.
I am expecting as I think everyone would that the first people who go to Mars will be exceptional people. Physically, with youth, and a good survival sense, and a energy level that can sustain abusive circumstances for a prolonged period.
Later they will be more towards average.
That is exactly good. What is needed in my opionion is a catalog of options, as well as a plan of which to use when. But of course that has to allow some flexability.
I am very happy to learn of other options. Sometimes it takes a while for me to comprehend deeply however. But when I finally do grasp something it is integrated into the catalog, and then when possible linked to other ideas, sometimes with success, and sometimes not so much. Trial and error then.
One little trick I have tried to work on is a greenhouse inside of a greenhouse.
The first one holds a pool of sterile water, because we would not want micro-organisms to grow there and block the light. The first one would be at ambient Martian pressure, but with a significant humidity inside of it. It would frost up inside at night, and then the frost would evaporate (I hope, and condense elswhere on a surface of Ice I hope. It would have a layer of transparent ice inside of it covering a pool of water. However within that pool of water would be a second greenhouse. That second greenhouse might have a layer of air 1 or 2 feet thick (Sorry for the archaic units). And warm water under the air layer. Floating plants, and swimming perhaps. However the two might not be compatable. If you wanted to grow floating plants, then perhaps you would want a column of water and ice 5 to 10 (Or more) feet thick, since you would want the minimum blockage of light. Duckweed is an option, a more cool water plant. However Hyacynth is not out of the question.
Again this is for the circumstances of a plentiful supply of makeup water from local ice.
The plants could be collected and directed to a deeper body of water to feed livestock (Fish, filter feeders).
For swimming, the layer of water in the first greenhouse needs to be deep. Perhaps 32 feet (Sorry again).
The 2nd greenhouse should not be made of glass. Plastic. I believe that glass has poor mechanical properties in water, but very good in a vacuum.
As for the collapsable tunnels you have suggested, I am curious. Can you give details? Or a diagram?
As JoshNH4H suggested or seemed to suggest:
The most valuable greenhouse would be one where ambient pressure could support actual rooted plants. Perhaps in the Hellas Depression at the best pressures avaiable, with a genetically engineered plant? Then as has been suggested we could have plant growth with a simple greenhouse and some moisture to the roots. However the plant would have to tollerate being watered with ice water.
Perhaps other people could come up with a better plan for this.
Perhaps it would be like rice but the water it was in would be ice water. This would help to compensate for the cold nights, if the ice water did not freeze and damage the plants.
Buzz Aldrin has been promoting this for some time.
It appears to me to be a strong improvement of a few things I read in old science fiction, and actually, the thinking of some other people as well.
http://buzzaldrin.com/space-vision/rock … rs-cycler/
From the start don't get me wrong. I think it would be great to send a set of people early to Mars, (With reasonable purpose, and ability), before doing this,
but suppose there are vast untaped resources, (I think there are), and a reasonable spacesuit, and reasonable methods to get people off of Earth, isn't this worth examination for a method to move large amounts of people from Earth to Mars to settle?
I think that all options can be explored. It is not like anyone is actually set into motion a action which will lock up the future of Venus. Not yet.
I see something about the Fusion explosion plan. A giant bubble of gas would be travelling through our solar system for a while. The explosion would put into a general orbit/s, and the solar wind would push it outwards. I am presuming the plan includes it missing the Earth. How about making it intercept Mars?
I wonder about another method.
If metalic materials were taken from Mercury put into an orbit, and assembled into shells using the abundant solar energy available, Filled with dust, and then moved to Venus, using the solar wind or solar sails.
The dust would be vented to the atmosphere of Venus, to sop up the sulphuric Acid.
Then if a rotating teather system could scoop atmosphere out and of course into them. Scooping would involve the scoops getting very cold while being out of the atmosphere, and then condensing gasses while in the atmosphere.
Fill the metal containers from Mercury with condensed gasses, CO2, and some N2.
Use the solar wind or light pressure to move the filled containers to Mars, and then vent much of the gasses. Move the containers to where ever seems useful.
After the sulphuric Acid was delt with, a very high temperature robitic mining system on the surface of Venus, and Terraformers floating colonies.
I wonder if the explosive method were used, if the atmospheric pressure of Venus would still be high? Then the two plans might fit together.
We seem to have a differnce in time scope. I am less concerned about the original establishment than the most powerful outcome.
I trust that people like you will work out the details of the first "Dry" settlement. It almost has to be such.
However, I am pleased to see that you innovated and added a potential water trap to your airlock.
The only way a first settlement would make sense in deep water is if a fision reactor were landed into a large body of ice, and melted into it, and if it then deployed methods to facilitate life, such as a Chemosynthis system, developing a pool of water filled with Oxygen and food. Then the people would land, and have food, power and Oxygen.
However, I don't think it is a best way.
I think your methods are the best for the start. However, I think that capturing and controlling the large bodies of ice at the poles and converting them to ice covered reserviors, are a very good objective to work towards.
I am not against greenhouse gasses. My understanding is that the poles should contain enough CO2 for a 10 Millibar average pressure to exist. Obviously this fits just fine with stabalizing the surface of cold ice, to decrease sublimination.
The pathway from First dry settlement to Polar Reservoirs might be decades long or longer. It might involve artificial salty dry valley lakes in the temperate zones, before getting the poles under control.
After the poles were under controll, an economy where water is moved in canals is reasonable. Particularly for the Southern Hemisphere. I believe that that ice cap is at high elivations, and Hellas is very low, so, gravity flow is reasonable. But you are correct this would be an action that a rather mature an powerful Martian society with millions or ever billions of people would be involved with.
As for the Vertical water column airlock. I agree not for the original dry methods. However, if you have a reservoir, and put a little dome on top of it you can pressurize it from 6-60 millibars as desired using outside atmosphere. (I think 6 to 12 might be enough if it is fresh ice water. 6 would be enough if it is a very cold brine).
The dome would have a hatch you entered from the side, for access to the lake surface, and it would have a hatch on it's bottom for access to the lake.
So at very maximum, if the dome pressurized to 50 millabars, it would take care of 1/20 of the pressure differential to 1 bar pressure inside the lake water column. The water column would take care of 19/20 of the differential.
If you used 11 milliabars for the pressurization, with the horizontal door closed and the floor hatch open (To ice water), then the dome would only carry 1/200 of the pressure differential. (More or less).
This mostly only makes sense if your object to access is inside of the lake. Perhaps a stone building on the bottom of the lake, perhaps a tunnel enterance to a underground facility, an entrence with either an air lock or a trap like a sink trap.
I like the idea you communicated about a balloon to capture air lock air.
Just some interesting stuff, I could intrude elsewhere with it, but why. It kind of fits here, and this thread is likey to go silent soon anyway.
I decided to separate this out, because I am interested in it specifically.
What about air locks? Can they be safe? Over time with wear?
For Polar Conditions with abundant water:
Because of my decompression phobia, I have felt that for instance a person emerging from a shelter would be best off to enter a reservoir of water and to emerge upwards into a partial pressure chamber. Perhaps 10-50 Millibars, depending on the temperature. A "Lid" would then be closed on the vertical door that the person emerged through, and then the partial pressure chamber would be decompressed and a horizontal door would be opened allowing access to the outside.
For "Tropical" conditions with sparce water:
I have to say I imagine it could also be done with brine very cold, so that the "Partial Pressure" chamber could actually stay at ambient. Instead of an air lock, it would be a "Vapor Lock". The person would emerge up, and close the lid. The the dry cold walls in the chamber would collect the moisture. Then the horizontal door would be opened. From time to time the "Vapor Lock would be heated up and the frost vaporized, and that being sucked into a compressor, to recapture the water.
The point of all this being that a water column does not require a pump so much, in the case of minimizing losses of O2 from the habitat.
I am aware that some very clever methods have been considered for baisically sheet metal doors that slide. But those imply dumping the contents of the airlock out.
I am also wary of the abrasive nature of the Martian environment as currently reported (These facts have a tendency to change over the years, so I am also aware of that).
So I am not wild about metal parts used over and over again for air locks. High maintenance and high risk I am thinking.
This time I will put up with what I consider abusive dismissal, as long as you understand that I won't consider myself dismissed.
I baisically need to have an outlet for this, and perhaps an opportunity for update, and then I consider I will be retired from an obligation to promote these alternate ideas, and can move on to more current and pleasant ideas what ever they might be.
So, thanks, for the opportunity to talk and get it done.
I am going to yield points to you. I had a look at some info on the suit, and I like it. (I read of such things long ago, but was not aware of current activities by MIT).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_activity_suit
However I am still going to say that I think that the ethusiasm is overdone. For instance if I was on Mars in one, and took my gloves off in the daytime, I might both freeze my fingers, and get my skin fried off by UV light (Big blisters in no time). However, that would be stupid, and I expect that their would be some type of protective cover or device.
Also, scuba divers do die from time to time, equipment failures, but as you imply, making the use of it from childhood could yield a population with a second sense about saftey with it. But it would still be risky business.
The other thing is that new things get old, especially in an abrasive environment with UV, and with natural aging, and mechanical wear. Maintaining safety margins is an unknown expense, and will be untill it is tried. The cost effectiveness of "Playing" outside would need proving.
I expect that from the time a real used working suit were demonstrated, the technology would improve and improve. As I said I can see a winner finally in the end if you give me time.
Still, I see no reason to abandon the notion of using the ice and water resources of Mars to a maximum benefit, altering the static condition where most water sits at the poles, to one where it is available dynamically. Particularly since I have shown that it can be integrated with certain power systems tied to the heat of the sun and the cold of the polar winters.
I do see the possibility for instance (Which I bet you will throw rocks at) where indeed greenhouses could be constructed on a large scale with a minimum necessary pressure, to grow some bulk vegitation, and to produce Oxygen. It is to be noted that a large body of cool water can hold significant Oxygen, and so then can serve as an Oxygen tank. Further, bulk vegitation could be dropped into such a reservoir, for cold blooded livestock to feed on. (Fish, filter feeders), and as I have mentioned, filter feeders could secrete shell from the waters, the minerals disolved in the water would provide what they need for that perhaps.
The counterpressure suits would make this type of industry more practicle.
Or prerhaps an advanced technology will allow skipping the fish, and simply making soilent green from the bulk vegitation.
Anyhow, it appears that most of our clashing is due to lack of communications, perhaps I could listen more, and you could present more details, and perhaps you might consider just a little more flexible thinking before making a decision. (If you want to).
I hope that is not too rude.
The profit margin is what matters.
I have edited my first response. I think I can do better.
It is a matter of prereferences. You could put forward the "It's my or the highway" attitude, but I might say, that there are various places and conditions on Mars, and I am not an enemy of pressure suits, especially counter pressure suits.
However there will be two budgets. One will be for maintainence, and one will be for expansion.
I really do not think that large money will be expended from either budget so that small children can hang out outside of the habitat. It would be spent on suits, so that well prepaired adults could do real and necessary work needed for survival and profit.
If that society were to work it's children, I would expect their chores would be mostly indoors.
And I do believe that it is unwise to have children accumulate radiation exposure before they have been raised and have become old enough to have had their children.
Outside would best be reserved for rational adults past prime, and still physically fit.
And I do believe that the best future is avatar machines, with which all persons including children could experience the Martian surface, such as smelling it, and seeing it in ultra violet light, and so on.
I actually have notions on a radically different type of Robot/Avatar. However it would be for heavy and crude work, but would compliment and also support the robots that NASA has been doing work on. The logic of it's structure is quite different.
So, you see a person and a child person as well, could do work from within the habitat, perhaps running a avatar/robot, and it could be structured like a video game, and not made into some repugnant task. (Although usually we make our own realitys a hell by our lack of perception of what truely matters).
And further, that child could in the same day swim in a diving bell filled with air at the bottom of an ice covered reservoir, and could in addition travel in a submarine, and could in addition run an underwater avatar, and could walk from one settlement to another in an underground tunnel lighted artificially, and filled with apple trees.
Not exactly being locked up in a tin can is it?
But returning to people working outside, the necessary work would be done by the most cost effective and morrally acceptable methods.
GW Johnson
Well, thanks! I have carried this for a very long time, and am pleased to pass it on in some form. It is old for me, so I have further options to describe.
JoshNH4H
I prefer a shake out, to be forced to be "Real" so thanks as well. Of course now I will continue.
Much of Mars will never be covered with water. The parts that make the most sense to cover at this time have the qualities of being suitable to hold a water cover, and also haveing large quantities of ice, and also the biggest prise is the precipitation which will always be dominantly at the polar ice caps (Until the axis of Mars changes in several 10,000 years).
So actually there are several options, and in my view they should all be used. However walking about in a pressure suit on the surface of Mars is going to be for adults only with rare exceptions, and such adults will have to be of a competent mind and in excellent health, and well trained. Even with that there will be risks such as radiation, so it would not be a prefered activity, just at times necessary. I would think that when possible avatar type virtual reality systems would be prefered over that when they could acctually acomplish a certain task.
I am guessing that a minority of Mars will ever be covered with water, and so the rest will require "Dry" methods. However if we capture the percipitation of the poles and create a reservoir that both is involved in energy production and having a large reservoir of water, then it is reasonable to draw water from those reservoirs, and "Pipe/Canal" it to locations dry to use as may be economically productive.
As for the layer of ice being too thick, the Dry Valley lakes in Antarctica do have photosynthisis in the top layers. The nature of those salty lakes is that the top layer is colder, and fresher, and has Oxygen in it. The lakes being isolated, they havea very limited number of species. Otherwise without the isolation, I expect that complex plants would have evoved to live there. However Photosynthis is limited. There is no point in acting like that is not true. The thickness of the ice could actually be thinner in places, to promote Photosynthisis, but of course then divers would have to be very careful not to get too high in the water column. Special safety measures would have to be employed. Keep in mind that under some circumstances ice can be much more transparant than we typically experience in our Temperate Earth Environments.
GW Johnson,
Although I have mentioned above that Photosysthisis does occur in the Dry Valley Lakes of Antarctica, I agree that it would be a weak boilogical system, perhaps strengthened by biological engineering to produce plants that are complex, and make the best use of the wavelengths available.
However I more favor Chemosynthisis. Methane seeps, Hydrothermal vents. All replicated artificially. Oxygen supplied, Chemical foods supplied, by industrial processes. Shellfish could extract calcium from the water which would disolve from the soils. The shells becomming a resource, perhaps for concrete?
Some of these life forms as food.
It is also true that the bottom of our ocean under the soil supports a living system without sunlight, just off of the reactions of chemicals, and from what I understand, that is very powerful. I don't know if some of it's properties of life would emerge into the water as well, but I am thinking it would.
Also I do support the use of transparent domes at low pressures, so that plants of a land type could be grown. Again, I am guessing eventually crops would be available which could be grown at 50 millibars, 20 Millibars and whatever, and so those domes could be pressurized accodingly to grow such a crop to produce bulk plant matter, and again in this case, waste plant matter could be dropped into water pools to support life. If these low pressure domes produced an excess of Oxygen, then that also could be injected into the water pools to support life.
Safety and also the happiness of humans: I see the value of creating some small very safe and rugged domes where humans could experience "Parks" the parks could have skylight sections where they could sit under the stars and moons, or sun themselves. However a safety feature might be a deep pool of water with an exit on it's bottom (And emergency Breathing apparatus at the bottom as well). If the dome became dangerous due to a drop in pressure or fire, or bad atmosphere,
then I presume well maintained alarms would direct them to dive into the pool and seek safety at the bottom.
Thanks much.
I didn't know that gloves could come off that way for up to 10 minutes at a time. I bet if feels funny, and perhaps not all that good for you, but sometimes delicate work has to be done. Thats something.
Well, your responses were far more kind and generous than I was expecting.
And hopefully you will not mind if I expand the conversation around this subject.
Here is a link to such a lake in Antarctica:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Vanda
A nuclear reactor in the habitat at the bottom of the Lake would make sense, because if it were carfully managed, it could perhaps dump heat into the lake.
The lake would also be a direct solar collector. However, Mars of course does not have the same solar flux, perhaps > 1/2 that of the Earth, and also subject to dust
storms.
I do make the point that extra heat could be dumped into the bottom of the lake by boiling water in solar concentrators distrubuted around the lake, and then turning
a turbine, and quenching the steam directly into the lake water. So, the lake would serve the utility of being a part of a condensation process, and and also as a
energy storage, method, since during the nights, (And the terrible cold winters at higher lattitudes), the lake could serve as a source of heat to drive a different
boiling process where Ammonia might be boiled. Of course this implies metal radiators to dissapate the heat, and recondese the ammonia at the surface. However, I
have been contemplating cisterns inside of sheds filled with an Ammonia/Water mixed solution, to again quench the Ammonia steam. The cisterns might actually be
hollows in the ground with stone/tile floors and walls, and inside of that bags suitable to tollerate the solution and also the temperatures. The purpose of the
sheds would be to protect the bags from UV light during the day, and also to shade the condenser bags, and I suppose to keep the abrasive dust of the Martian
environment at bay to a degree. The sheds might have an open wall though facing the polar direction, to allow heat to radiate out, or perhaps just a transparent
layer of "Plastic film". Whatever that would be, it would be desired that it had the minimum greenhouse effect and let heat radiate out of the bags.
So, the nuclear power might be an small part of the power sourcing, but desired, in case of a major fault on the solar driven power system.
So, with much electricity, it becomes reasonable to think about a large industrial infrastructure. I suggest that this would be implemented in tunnels in sandstone
or other rather soft rock, under the lake. Of course some processes would work better on the surface in buildings built there.
I think that such tunnels would actually be a good place to grow fruit trees under artificial light. The artificial lights would be modulated in accordance with
power availablity, since trees are used to illumination variance due to clouds and changing seasons. Thus this would be a load leveling method, a method to utilize
scrap power, when there was an excess of power. The interesting thing is if it was apple trees, you could let the tunnels cool down and perhaps put in very little
light during the winter. However, I am not sure what the apple trees humor would be about having seasons twice as long. This would then be food, and wood, and also
"Parks" for people to spend leisure time in. So this could have significant value.
In the end my dream would be to fill the entire Northern basin back up with an ice covered sea. However the transformation to this situation would be long and hard.
I could mention several impediments to that. Such as the likelyhood that there is not enough water available to fill that flat baisin to 100 feet deep, and there
is no certainty that it would be a salty body of water. If it were to be, then the salt would have to exist under the soil, a remnant of the ocean that existed
Billions of years ago.
However if achieved, then the point northern condensation would be captured, and any ice and snow condensation would be melted from below, the solar concentrators ubiquitous on top of the ice layer. In such a case, I would presume terraformation at that point would have created an atmospheric pressure of at least 10 to 20 millibars. The need to shield the ice from sublimation would be reduced or eliminated, since you would have a continuous source of make up water from the condensation on the surface of the north pole, which would be continuously melted from below.
The I would expect a lesser sized ocean covered with ice, and likely not as salty as I would prefer. However, it would be easy to dyke off "Polders" to fill with properly salty water, to allow for bottom water of 23 C (73 F) and more.
Trucks that were partially boyant but traveled under the ice would be an option. They actually could run on roads on the bottom of the Ocean/Sea/Lake, or perhaps
could be very boyant, and connect to rails, under the ice, attached to the bottom of the ice surface. Subs? Yes.
In the past, I have made attempts to suggest at various websites that a good way of pressurizing a habitat is to have it at the bottom of a lake. Of course on Mars having a lake requries significant work. However the reason I am posting this is the hope that I could get feedback on why I never got what I considered a serious answer on the notion. I really don't care if it is ever done, it annoys me that I don't think that I ever got a killer reason why it shouldn't be attempted.
In the past, I did get the notion that Mars is completely Arid, and that a pool of water would simply sink into the rigolith.
Here is a link which suggests that this may not be true if you are in the northern or sourthern half lattitudes (And I susspect that if you had a supply of water that it could be done at lower lattitudes as well).
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/sc … artianice/
The notion as put forward originally included emulation of Dry Valley Lakes in Antarctica. But on Mars manipulation of the environment would be required.
In it's present condition, it would be needed that a supply of make up water be available at a location accessable.
-Ice must cover the lake. To protect the ice from sublimination, mechanical means are required. (See articles on this site about IceCrete). I generally expect that a vapor barrier covered by a layer including glass windows is required (Just a little pressurization might be prefered).
-Salt in the water is prefered. In that condition the bottom of the lake could well experience terrestrial temperatures. (Google for Antarctic Dry Valley Lakes).
-Generally the notion of living underwater is not practicle, on Earth. Why do it. if you can walk about on the surface. On Mars, however, this equasion of preference does not hold true.
If I had an arcificial dry valley lake on Mars, I could:
1) Put on a swim suit suitable for a man (In order not to scare people), and have a breathing apparatus and go out in the bottom of the lake and touch a rock with my bare hands, and hold a handful of soil with my bare hands. I might expect the possiblity of temperatures I could endure, or even be comforatable with.
2) Build an arch type stone structure under the water on the bottom of the lake, and fill it with air, and cover it with soil so that the bubble of air within it did not explode it with boyancy. I would then have a underwater "House".
3) Dig tunnels under the lake into the rock. Create habitats there.
4) Perhaps have photosynthisis occuring in the cold layer of relatively fresh water just under the ice. With gentic engineering perhaps have crops growing there, production of food.
Anyway, I am fearful of the notion of glass domes, pressurized. The slightest break, and the pressure leaks out.
Hydrostatic pressurization is not like that. A leak means that sublimation is slowly taking the ice layer away that covers the liquid water (Which would scab over with ice if exposed to Martian Pressure). This would be a thing that could be addressed before lethal conditions occured.
Anyway, I am wondering what is against this set of notions?
I like it.
You were beyond my scope in speculation on the Fusion blast. I don't dispute it, I just avoid it since I am not qualified to comment.
I was one of many who have speculated on fantastical Star Treckie notions. Out of desparation.
However if you want to boil off the Venus Atmosphere, Nasa suggested an Asteroid impact. However that would take thousands of years to cool off I believe. I can't wait that long.
Besides, it seems wasteful, since the Nitrogen in particular could be so helpful to Mars.
Perhaps a Microwave power source in orbit could overheat the upper layers of the Atmosphere of Venus. Plasma being magnetic, is there then a way to capture some of the bubble produced. (I believe that the sun actually produces such explosions/bubbles, and did so recently).
Then can the mass be accumulated into a container of some kind. (I presume the plasma has to yield it's energy, and become a liquid phase of solid phase through cooling).
This also requires make up energy, to hold the accumulated mass into orbit.
Then can it be transported to Mars? Star Treckie again I suppose, but Venus is about hopeless. And anyway talk is cheep. Don't bill me so much.
OK,
I will add to that:
http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-02-gal … anets.html
So, in any discussion of human travel from one star to another, it seems only reasonable to add as a very important precursor, the ability to find, and utilize these objects. I think that between the various views expressed there is some real options to expand into such a collection of objects, particularly if some of them are magnetic, and have moons, or have materials available to make large concentrating mirrors, or if Fusion or something else are available as an energy supply.
I am inclined to favor trying to find a Jupiter, because if it had an IO, then it would have boiled off it's water and exposed silicate materials to use. Also a Jupiter with a moon or two has energy available from the inertia of those moons, and also the tidal energy captured as heat in the moons in some cases.
Of further interest could be an "Earth", or "Venus" cast out of it's solar system. Having a hot core still, and likely a magnetic field (Venus would convect if it cooled off in the outer solar system?), Plate Tectonics would likely expose hot rock at the points where oceans spread, if it could spread faster than cold ice could flow over it. This also could be an energy source for starting a civilization on such a planet.
It seems to imply that the outer Oort cloud is limited in mass, but does not specify the mass of the inner disk of the Oort cloud.
My interest would be to find significant objects (Ceres, or Juno size or bigger) with metal cores, 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, and so on from our star "Sol" to another star. If a signficant planet, especially a gass giant with moons existed with a magnetic field, or even an Earth or Mars with a magnetic field, then of course that would not just be a stepping stone, but a location of major interest in itself.
My best attempt to create an inducer would be to put orbital objects in the same orbit, spaced at even intervals, and then to create a hot cathode to boil off electrons towards the next orbital object. Each orbital eliment would serve as a anode to the cathode of the other. To create a circuit, they would all have to be in action. The circuit would be an electron current passing between the collection of orbital objects. The field produced should have a field pointed at the north and south Martian poles, presuming that this "Circuit" of orbital objects were to orbit at the equator. If in the Martian interior there existed the convection of a fluid having magnetic properties, then perhaps some induced effect would occur, but I am quite out of my league in this, just grasping at straws, due to the nature of your request which is made with limited scientific information on what is the process inside of Mars.
That is not against you, but to say that I sort of have a notion, but notions at this level are usually wrong, but might be next door to something worth thinking about.
It is not required that the objects would orbit the equator.