You are not logged in.
Back to the bad news
Yesterday 10 men where found in the outskirts of Baghdad, They had been handcuffed then shot. The difference was these men where Sunni rather than Shia and that it was likely that members of the newly formed police did it.
This is not uncommen now as bodies are found daily and its probabily due as the Sunni have supported the insurgency where the minority Shia became the majority in the newly formed Iraqi police and armed forces. In Saddams days the Shia where the minority and where often the victims of such terror tactics.
I have said this before that Iraq seems to me to be gearing up for a major civil war when the Coalition leaves and this is just one more example of the truly deep down mess that is there.
Then again the area where the Sunni live is of very little commercial or financial interest to us in the west.
Edit Grypd
One of the Sunni who had been executed has been found to have been a cleric.
Mad grad
Hope you had a good time and you enjoyed yourself.
What you didnae fins deep fried Mars bars.
Ach theyrse Sleekit you Ken.
(Of course I understand if anything is bound to get our American cousins riled up it would be that last statement, But hey I like being perverse sometimes and getting someone really angry often tells you more about the person than many reasonable questions)
Not at all! True blue Americans all hate paying taxes, you degenerate wanker.
![]()
Lol
Explains why your economy is in a mess and you produce 25% + of the greenhouse gases of the world.
Oh and since im Scottish and that it has been calculated that over 80% of the American population claim descent from Scottish ancestors, where does that leave you :laugh:
Some of these terrorists can't just be -- by nature -- rotten or apathetic or sociopathic or mentally disturbed?
There is one interesting fact that has been found out by the police. This is that 3 of the bombers had return tickets (these being the ones on the Tube trains) and that there bombs exploded exactly at the same time. Then there was the last who deliberatly set his bomb off a lot later than the others.
There is the possibility that three of the bombers did not believe they where to be suicide bombers at all. That they where deliberately misled into becoming the sacrificial bombers, it is also likely that though the security operation would have quickly caught up with them that they did not really understand this. And at least one of the bombers was considered to be "a bit slow" in the mental stakes.
So they where sociopaths who hated mainstream British society and its tolerance for all creeds but who came from a society where in the past racial incidents where common. But now as a society Britain is a lot more tolerant and for a long time I thought this was for the good. After the bombs though there has been a lot of talk as to where Britain should really stand in these circumstances and rascist incidents are definitly are on the up.
So a few are nuts. And a few is all it takes to fly planes into buildings, or take hostages, or behead civilians, or wipe out a throng of children asking for candy.
The incident with the children is one of the most horrific instances of the many in Iraq but it does seem to have been rather ignored or at least not too highlited in the west. This is not the case though in the middle east where it has been headline news for the last few nights. This one incident has dramatically reduced the support the insurgents had amongst mainstream Sunni in Iraq and Syria and Jordan. Sometimes the most horrible incidents happen and good things come out of it and I can only hope that this is one such incident, though I would not have wished it on anyone.
Which is exactly why smart people are calling for dialogue, and for inclusion of the disenfranchised in order to provide a legitimate alternative
Well since the majority Sunni population did not exactly vote this left the minority Shi'te and Kurd in a lot stronger position inside the elected Iraqi goverment. Of course there own fault but somehow telling a people, "but you did not vote so the consequences are your own" does not exactly work too well does it.
The last option is unsustainable given the rise of technology. As our technology base increases, the power of individuals to maximise carnage among the group makes total security almost impossible.
Do you know the explosives made by the London bombers where from easy to access materials and formed TATP or Triacetone triperoxide. The UK has some of the most stringent anti explosives laws of any country and a long experience of there misuse, but modern chemicals and a bit of knowledge go far too far. And one other symptom of TATP is its lack of an odour (and detection) which is why the Shoe bomber tried to use it.
Americans should know this, it's our history. A bunch of disenfranchised British subjects got fed up, and revolted. They revolted because they saw no other option to have their voices heard.
Heh, and here was me thinking it was a simple power grab they wanted more power and got it not to mention a profit motive. I could even go so far to ask about slaveowning, but....
(Of course I understand if anything is bound to get our American cousins riled up it would be that last statement, But hey I like being perverse sometimes and getting someone really angry often tells you more about that person than many reasonable questions.)
It is the capability to keep the robots working day after day, month after month that makes them such a desired option for base and industrial creation on the Moon. So they will not have the same capability as a Bulldozer on Earth but then again we need to increase the capacity to utilise the materials gained first.
And as we expand our capability we also increase the capability to expand the Human prescence on the Moon as well. If there is Air to breathe and places to stay already made for them and there is fuel to get the craft back to Earth and this increases it only makes for cheaper missions and therefore more of them.
Eventually we can export these resources to LEO etc then it makes for an increased capacity for all mans spaceflight. Who is to say we dont have the first Mars missions built of mostly lunar derived materials
In Europe starting about the 1580s there became less and less tolerance of the various Christian faiths that where present. This period is called the religous wars and really culminated in the 30years war in what is now Germany. These wars killed more people than the 1st and 2nd world wars together.
It was the religous strife of the period that made more and more people emigrate to new lands like the USA and South Africa.
Does not seem that anyhting was sorted by the peace of Westphalia does it.
I disagree it is not pointless, nor can it not be resurected
There are large areas of Iraq that are peaceful and for the population the most safe they have felt in possibly a century.
This makes these people very very friendly to the people who have given them this and this is us. So when we leave do we abandom them of course we do not. We cannot morally allow there support for us to make them the victims of the more viscious anti western forces.
nothing new to pay for Klipper either.
from the article:
The programme provides money for the development of a reusable spacecraft to replace the ageing Soyuz manned launch vehicle.
That spells Kliper, no?
With that Budget, seriously ???
A very good site and thanks for bringing it to Newmars.
And welcome to Newmars Jim, Hope you have hours of learning here and bring a lot to the forums.
Failte
But a mass produced attachment could be made that would do the job at least for keeping the modules in the correct axis. It would also allow the "tug" to find the target easier.
One other thing is that as the ISS modules will require a support to hold them tight then use that to provide the hold and attachment for the altitude jets. It can also have a place for the "tug" to grapple without risking the reather fragile components.
And would it really be that difficult to make a frame that has the same points to hold the modules.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4683977.stm]BBC Russia sets space budget for next ten years
Russia sets its budget and will be spending a total of $10.50 Billion or 300 Billion roubles in the whole ten years
That means no Mars missions and infact nothing new to pay for Klipper either.
So if Griffin wants to get rid of the Shuttle Early but he needs it to get components to the ISS. And that the ISS components need a means to get maneuvered to the ISS.
Sounds like a space tug is needed does it not. How much would it cost to have one made and delivered and if it only needs to be fueled from the cheaper to launch DaStick would it not make economic sense.
My one problem with the situation in Iraq is that it appears to be building to a very nasty civil war when the international forces leave. Sure we have the Iraqi security forces but im sure you will find they think of themselves as more Shi'te or Sunni or even Kurd than Iraqi. And even these groups have factions like the Marsh Arabs etc. Im sorry to say I really see Iraq as a patch work of ethnic groups who hate each other.
Then there are the influences of Iran and Saudi Arabia to add as well.
A Yugoslavia waiting to happen.
The D10 Caterpillar (a minimum for a telerobotic machine in power and usefulness) is 90 ton. Any telerobotic system of heavy construction machinery will be between fifty and a hundred tons fully assembled.
But a caterpillar type bulldozer will actually be of very little practicle use on the Moon and possibly Mars. Its down to how the surfaces of the Moon and Mar are made up. In the Moons case where we have actually investigated it we found the Moon to be about 11 to 13cm of very loose powdery regolith and after that the regolith is extremely compacted. A Caterpillar type bulldozer relies on its weight to "bite" into the surface and to then push the "soil" out. This may be impossible so other methods have to be thought about. We have talked about this before but instead of posting a link I will recap.
1) We dont use a blade at all but use a rotating set of brushes under a robot and the material is then scoured out.
2) We use the time old method of a drag chain pulling a Blade designed to dig itself in by its shape.
3) We Drill into the regolith and core what we need out.
4) We can loosen the Regolith by either chemical explosives or a more interesting idea of blasting air down small drilled areas and shifting the regolith that way.
What is more important is that these above methods do not need heavy equipment to be sent and if weight is needed to put on these vehicles we can sinter some bricks and have them installed on a Moon robot.
As we continue to reduce down to a non human presence, They become little more than a science project of limited time and usefulness
But that is where you are wrong the idea is to increase capacity on the Moon and elsewhere to lead us to go to Mars. In space where conditions are so foreign we must be able to increase our capacity for doing while reducing cost. And if using telerobotics on the Moon does this then we must use them. But note the Moon is about as far as we can go with that particular technology to be useful in base infrastructure creation as we run up against the great laws of physics in communication delays.
I believe that two agencies would end up fighting each other as to exactly where each agency's remit ended. Not to mention that there would then be a need for two bureacracies and two agencies fighting to get funding each year.
Telerobotics are fun, Just like a videogame with real outcomes...And you only need to leave the habitat when that oversized tonka toy needs a new filter.
Manned exploration - fine, I'm not challenging that.
But suppose we send robots to get things set up, do exploration and experiments under semi-direct remote control.
How big would the rocket need to be, to deliver maybe one metric ton of equipment and robot(s) to the moon?
How much will the lander have to mass (doesn't need to lift off again, unlike manned lander).
How much will such a mission cost?
Twinbeam,
Sending an already assembled bot requires the robot to be smaller in the package to be balanced for launch. Its fully assembled shape is inherently incompatable with the lander. And if something is amiss, no humans to fix the failure.Either way it will cost as much as fifty billion to support the needs of the mission.
A human presence allows multiple simultaneous tasks to be pursued and maintained with less infrastructure.
If the robodozer fails it needs a repair bot to handle the fix, but the repair bot must also handle the repair of say the tunnel digging machine. In many cases this is something that requires reprogramming.
Humans wont need the vast level of energy a robotic 20 year mission will require. And the manned lander doesnt need to come home.
The conformists just want it that way. They are alergic to working for food, water, and shelter and have an acute fear of abandonment...
srmeaney there is a large range of launchers that can currently deliver a cargo over a ton to the lunar region. For about $140 million you can get an Arianne V and its deleivery of 7.7tons.
And you are mistaken in that damaged robots cannot be repaired in situ or dragged back to a central repair station. I have said it before but if we can operate on a human being by telerobotic means and increasingly do so then we can work on a Robot. And most damage will be of a mechanical nature than something that requires extensive rebuilding.
This means that for the Moon and creation of base infrastructure there a tele-robotic rover using control from Earth is a possibility very efficient method of operation.
Police in the UK have raided addresses across the North of England and have done a controlled explosion at one of the addresses. They also believe that they have identified all 4 bombers. But one man has been arrested though not a bomber as the 4 bombers died at the scene of the explosions.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4674463.stm]BBC news article
It appears President BUsh also took my advice
Yeah, next he is going to admit he made all these mistakes, and then renounce God and the Fundamentalist Christian Right.
My ESP messages to nominate Mike Griffin for NASA Administrator worked well enough.
SO you admit it at long last. You and president Bush are on the same wavelength. It explains so much. It explains why you cant stand his policies they are so similar to your own thoughts.
Thanks Spacenut.
Still the first peoples to arrive in the British Isles and this includes Ireland walked. The Sea level due to the glaciers was a lot lower and large areas where above the water line. With the end of the Ice age those areas flooded and who knows this could be one of the "flood" myths.
Then again Atlantis could well be just a good story by a master teller of stories and lets be honest it is a good one and we still appreciate now.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050712/wl_ … lasts_dc]4 explosions on Spanish power station
*Rescind comments. Need to Google...
--Cindy
P.S.: ETA have anything to do with Al-Qaeda and similar ilk?
For a quick guide to ETA
ETA is the prime terrorist organisation of the Basque people. The Basques live in the region named after them in spain and just across the frontier into France. They are a celtic race and have a culture more similar to Irelands than mainland spain. Actually the IRA and ETA have very close links.
ETA has trained a lot of its people in Libya and used to recieve a lot of money and equipment from the same source. There does not appear to be any real links with Al-Qhaeda but in that murky world......
Think of this.
What would have happened if Nazi Germany or Japan had made the first bomb.
Both countries where attempting to do so and Germany had a Nuclear reactor. The only reason that Hitler did not succeed was the bravery of some Norwegian and British commandoes and a raid on a heavy water production site.
I dunno...think I'd rather get attacked with a fork than one of these phaser-type thingies. :-\ Seems there'd be a better chance at fighting back.
--Cindy
The weapon is non lethal. A fork isn't.
*A person attacking with a fork has to be in close physical proximity to do so; contact or near contact. There's a chance they could be overpowered and defeated.
Someone with a "phaser" device could stand many feet away and continue firing. Consider what that alone could do to a person with a heart condition or epilepsy...
--Cindy
Right im entering this conversation only for one reason I have been stabbed by a very disturbed individual with a fork.
The advantage for the DOE "phaser" as it is not a killing weapon but if for example you have an invasion on your nuclear site of protestors opposed to nuclear power (something that happens a lot) then to use this weapon would be considered a reasonable method. And in these days of political stunts like invading nuclear stations a good alternative to simply shooting them with lethal ammunition is always to be desired.
There is also the possibility of suicide by proxy. This is where an individual deliberatly puts himself in the way of a situation where lethal force will be used on him. This will give him the feeling that he will not actually commit suicide and he has let it be the decision of another usually a policeman. Any means that do not usually kill and allows us to disable someone who may not be a criminal just ill should allways be looked at. We are not animals, Human life is precious and only we have the capacity for mercy and compassion.
There is that but the orbit for the ISS is to aid Russia actually it makes it bad for creating Lunar etc missions. A clean sheet space station is frankly better than any relationship to the white elephant that the ISS consists of.
Still for the best use of new space station a reliable reusable shuttle is needed that actually reduces cost to get people to the station and has a short turn around rate.
There are a lot of foreign workers in Saudi Arabia and this does indicate a couple of things.
1) The Saudi populace does not have the skill base to be able to function properly and to do the jobs that are required.
2) The Saudi goverment does not trust its own people
30000 people evacuated from center of Birmingham... what a mess
And Spain gave up.......
So what ? The Mail reveals withdrawal plan
Should have read the article. It is not a pullout but a reduction in forces in Iraq. And if you have read it properly it is just the British part of the mission the USA was going to reduce its contingent there by over 50% too.
The plan was always to reduce troop strength as the local Iraq security forces begin to take over there duties.
Birmingham was evacuated as there was a real and credible threat to peoples lives. Was it wrong to do so, Of course not.