You are not logged in.
I agree, Shaun. It would definitely be more expensive to be added to Mars Direct. I thought I would post some of my rambling thoughts.
How big would the storm shelter since it would have to include space for consumables, life support, bathroom, etc.. in relation to the actual had itself?
Thanks, RobertDyck. When you mentioned mini magnetosphere, that got me to remember about a university that was working on that. It was supposed to be faster than nuclear propulsion. Has anyone else heard anything about this?
This question may have been answered or asked before. Could the Mars Direct hab enroute to Mars contain a generator of sorts and produce a magnetic field somehow to combat the effects of solar flares and microparticles?
Looks like I got the NASA Mars mission and the ESA Mars mission mixed up!!
I haven't looked around yet, but I assuming the the Beagle has taken off okay?
I love articles like this.
http://cmex-www.arc.nasa.gov/CMEX/data/ … Table.html
Most if not all of you have probably found this page at one time or another. My question is if we can have this much detail in this type of mission, why couldn't we launch the first manned mission within the 2007 - 2014 time frame? Shouldn't our technology advance enough to develop a heavy launch vehicle within 3-11 yrs?
Glancing through the site, it mentioned a problem about depending on one launch facility. We probably will have the shuttle flying (unfortunately) so that's one launch facility. We could bring in the Russians or the ESA to help with the other. I believe the US could do it on our own, but why not get international help. The US will more than likely be the biggest contributor anyway.
It just bugs me to see this much planning and details in a manned Mars mission and it seems like nothing is being done. I could be wrong. I hope I am.
NuclearSpace,
When will this interview be available for download? Every time I go to the Radio Free Mars website, it hasn't changed since mid April.
I was doing some searching on nuclear powered spacecraft and came across this NASA spacecraft design from 1989. Go to this site. You won't be able to read too much about it but you can order the document.
I had seen somewhere that China said they would continue with their space program regardless of SARS.
The article posted by clark was interesting. Can you imagine the look on NASA and the administration's face when we see pictures of China's flag on the moon and finding out that they are there permanently?
It's going to be delayed by a few days.
That's good to see! Good luck to all the participants in the X-Prize!
I voted "pay for a guided tour" although I do think that the government would try and stop your efforts. Too bad that we can't convince Bill Gates and Warren Buffet to help!
I agreee, dicktice. Whether you like the current administration or not, you have to wonder how the upcoming nuclear propulsion system will fair in the next administration.
I found this site the other day. It may have been posted here before.
I mistakenly posted my question on another thread. But here's what I have:
1. With NASA pushing for Project Prometheus, will the Mini-Mag Orion (MMO) take a back seat?
2. Which would be faster to build and test Prometheus or MMO?
3. Can MMO be launched directly from Earth?
The suspense to waiting on this interview is going to drive me crazy!! I can't wait to read it!
It's great to see the developement of this new propulsion type system. The quote stated that NASA will probably be the first customer. My questions for anyone are as follows:
1. With NASA pushing for Project Prometheus, will the Mini-Mag Orion (MMO) take a back seat?
2. Which would be faster to build and test Prometheus or MMO?
3. Can MMO be launched directly from Earth?
It's nice to see something new that could possibly change space exploration forever. According to the article, MMO could be built within this decade! We need to push for the development immediately. Not that it will do any good, but I'm going to write a letter to Congress/Senate and NASA. IMHO, NASA needs to go full throttle on a new launch system (not the shuttle) and develop MMO. I would love to see the day when we will have continous launches of manned exploration of the solar system.
I would definitely have most of the money go towards manned Mars exploration and manned nuclear powered spacecraft development. The rest would go to ensuring that my wife and child are taken care of, helping my family, in-laws and other relatives. I would also build me an observatory in my backyard!
If this "foundation" does exist, maybe this will spur NASA to react. You know the government will not allow this.
If and when Mars does become geothermally active, could you imagine an eruption of Olympus Mon? How much damage would a volcano of that size cause?
Mine was the 80s era robot type cartoons Voltron...Defender of the Universe; Mighty Orbots!!, Transor Z etc....
If this is a joke, the person(s) that started it should be strapped to a rocket and become the first human on Mars!
When I first saw this, the first thing that popped into my head was "April Fool's!"
BUT, what if it's not a joke? The only thing that causes me concern is the "ownership" of Mars. Can we say "Total Recall" type society?
With all these reports coming about liquid water on Mars, we definitely need to put the Mars exploration into overdrive. We are always looking for life elsewhere in the universe and it could be right next door! Enough with the analysis and let's go see for ourselves! Not with robots but humans!!!!
A very thought provoking article. I liked it! Can you imagine what life would be like right now if Orion was allowed to proceed? Although, it surprised me that the article mentioned the Apollo program may have actually caused Orion's demise.
How long can antimatter be stored?
It would be nice to go back to the moon, but let's get to Mars first! Although, I can see some people saying "been there, done that".