You are not logged in.
HiRISE image browser now online, with full zoom and pan working!
Amazing photos, any more info on the Sharad (radar) instrument ?
Nah, Ariane-V and Ares-I are about the same size, perhaps our rocket being a little bigger even. Just put JWST on Ares-I.
What you say makes sense but there are still 2 problems with this, Ares-1 will be man-rated, twice as safe as an Atlas or Delta-derived design and therefore more expensive than a Delta/Ariane et cetera
A more expensive rocket will only add to the cost of the JWST telescope.
The Ares I was designed for safety, not cost. Ares I can not compete with the Atlas V or the Ariane in terms of cost for any unmanned payloadAres is still in Design/Definition phase, so far Thiokol's Ares-I looks like a good launcher - but it may not be ready in time, the next Presidential budget in a few years might want NASA to start hacking bits off Ares for cost cutting.
Primary disadvantage in using Ares-I is the increased cost per flight, it will be over-cost, inefficient. So far it's clocking up $ 4,562,675,783 to develop and per launch will be twice as expensive as the Delta/Ariane class....
Soyuz in comparison is one of the cheapest and effective rockets can launch payloads for about 45 million dollars. This is why space tourists love it - but its limited by payload (aprox 6 000 kg or 13 000 lbs) and there is sometimes political fallout for depending on the Russians.
Ariane is the best option for now !
The advantage of using Ares-I in the next years is its said safer than the STS config for getting manned flights into space, it will lift larger payloads because Shuttle's payload is nearly all Shuttle and it will be a whole lot less expensive than the Space Shuttle which costs about $ 1,090,576,000 Per Launch !
talk about a crazy price !!
NASA's done a version of this mission called WMAP)
http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/m … 30211.html
ESA's Planck will work between Wavelengths of 30–857 GHz
Gallery of pics to be found here
http://www.rssd.esa.int/index.php?proje … ctures_top
Chance encounter with comet nets surprising results
Should have launched in the next weeks
RpK protest NASA's COTS decision
http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/content/?cid=5243
Rocketplane Kistler (RpK) has written a letter to NASA's Scott Horowitz, asking him to reconsider the decision to issue the company with a 30 day notice of termination of their COTS contract.
I had fore knowledge of these looming cuts I think it was back in September of 2005.
Some person who had been working in the industry chatted to me about the possibility of a number of instruments / designs getting binned to save money.
If I've any new info on the Chinese mission and 2012 Rover I'll comeback and post
MSL's Mast Camera could be the next instrument to be scrapped
The new question that has to be asked, once they start cutting bits of MSL at what stage does it stop becoming a science lab and just become another design representing the goals of a MarsExplorationRover / LunokhodRover?
Most rodents only live about two years, so the effects on them can be greater and quicker, Arthritis, Weakening of immune system, cataracts all happens at a much faster rate. In "dogyears" or whatever you people call it, these rodents could have spent many months in space, so the experiment provides some good data. They only big problem is the body of a gerbil is very different to that of a human being.
LIVE: Japan to shoot for the moon with SELENE
Japan prepares lunar spacecraft for blastoff
http://www.spaceflightnow.com/h2a/selen … eview.html
Heralded as the most advanced lunar exploration mission in more than 30 years, a sophisticated Japanese spacecraft is on the cusp of launching the first wave of a scientific assault on the moon to probe its history and prepare for future human voyages to Earth's celestial companion.
The pickup truck-sized spacecraft will be rolled to the launch pad early Thursday atop Japan's flagship H-2A rocket. After workers make connections between the booster and its oceanfront launch pad, officials will begin final testing of the rocket's systems before pumping thousands of gallons of chilled liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen propellants into fuel tanks aboard the launcher.
Preparations for the launch continue to proceed as planned, according to a spokesperson with the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA.
Clocks at the control center on Tanegashima Island are counting down to the scheduled launch time at 0131:01 GMT Friday (9:31:01 p.m. EDT Thursday). Blastoff will be in the late morning hours Friday in Japan.
Improperly installed parts aboard the Kaguya probe postponed the launch by a month as technicians replaced the suspect components. Bad weather earlier this week forced Japanese officials delay the flight an additional day because it interfered with work to prepare for the launch, according to JAXA.
The 174-foot-tall rocket will roar to life with the ignition of its LE-7A main engine in the final seconds of the countdown. Twin 50-foot-long solid rocket boosters will fire when the countdown clocks reach zero. Two smaller solid-fueled motors will ignite moments after the H-2A rocket vaults into the sky.
The H-2A will roll onto a path flying east of Tanegashima just seconds after liftoff, and the four solid rocket boosters will complete their job in the first two minutes of flight. The first stage will be shut down and jettisoned nearly seven minutes after launch, followed by ignition of the upper stage's LE-5B engine, which will power the rocket and payload into a preliminary parking orbit about 12 minutes into the mission.
After a speedy trip across the Pacific Ocean, the upper stage engine will fire again for about three-and-a-half minutes to extend the high point of its orbit to nearly 145,000 miles from Earth, or about three-fifths of the way to the moon. Deployment of the 6,360-pound satellite should occur off the west coast of South America about 45 minutes after liftoff.
Kaguya will deploy its solar panel and high gain antenna in the hours after the craft is released from the H-2A's upper stage. Next for the robotic explorer will be two burns to gradually raise its orbit over the next two weeks.
The science team will also check the $480 million mission's suite of 15 science instruments, which include two 110-pound daughter satellites and the first high-definition television camera to travel beyond Earth orbit.....
Rocketplane faces funding crisis
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/ … 54282.aspx
Perhaps you missed Griffin saying that RTTM would cost $104 billion.
Do you honestly believe those numbers to be hard fact and gospel truths ? Griffin is a good leader but he isn't going to be totally honest with budgets and politics and in events like this he is trying to put a good spin on things, the last thing Administrator Michael Griffin wants to do is approach congress with some hard fact figure like the ultra-expensive SEI to Mars as proposed by Bush-Snr. Groundbreaking NASA projects are known to go way over budget, JWST budgets had to be adjusted as the project saw cost over-runs and the Space Shuttle program was supposed to provide cheaper/safer access to space for 30 billion until it retired, instead the program never lived up to its objectives and has been running costs of over $150 billion dollars.
Even if your Lunar flag planting mission is pulled off and gets done well, we as members of the human race are still no closer to Mars than we were in during the 1970s. Why go back to the Moon (RTTM) when the real goal should be Mars ? The heroic Buzz Aldrin has said that going back to the Moon is not a great place and he said that Mars is a much more habitable place for people....so why waste time and dollar on RTTM ?
They wont go with Solar Sails. It will be with Reusable Nulear Propulsion Tugs (Fully Automated) They will dock with what is essentialy a space station of Mars Habitat landers every two years and push the two hundred thousand passengers out to Mars for their colonization wave.
It leaves in Mars orbit a torus of nodes (a kind of spacewheel) which are then anchored to a Martian Moon for Use as a Framework of Industrialization.
Lander Habs descend to Mars en mass.
The Tug returns for the next two hundred thousand passengers and does the same to them.
John Glenn has already said the Moon is not the place to stay and remarked that direct-to-Mars is the way to go. NASA may be already doing a little gamble with outsourcing - ask for private help from the Falcon or alt.spacers or outsource some exploration to nations like India and such. VSE estimates vary from source to source, I've seen numbers that range from $190-320 billion, we must also consider NASA's other future missions like JWST is a more ambitious and expensive project then it was billed as which should cost several billion. Other space groups aren't moving so fast, ESA has a slower pace than NASA, Russia's Angara will be awhile in coming. The VSE may be the priority but I've also seen alarming 900 billion or 1$ Trillion dollar figures
Officials at JAXA (NASDA) are calling the SELENE mission the “largest lunar mission since the Apollo program”. It is already four years behind in its schedule, but JAXA officials are confident that this launch date will be successful for its newest spacecraft. Japan has done some very successful missions in the past such as probes to the Moon exploring in the early 90s with Hiten spacecraft (Muses-A) and the Japanese have done studies of comets with Suisei and Sakigake but sadly also had a number of hitches such as the Nozomi failure and ASTRO-E. Hopefully all will go well with this latest mission, and Japan will be onward to the Moon. Looks like the new launch date is September 13 Y2007
Some of these images are amazing, fantastic shots !
Thanks for posting them cIclops
The good news is that Ares I is meeting its requirements.
We will see, while I agree that NASA needed a new vision and putting men on Mars would be a great thing - you cIclops, have decided to put a lot of happy-clappy positive spin behind the CLV or 'TheStick'. EELVs could have welcome solutions for certain payloads, there are some big doubters about TheStick and with good reason, the timetable hasn't been running so smoothly, they had to extend contracts and pump in millions more.
[url=http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/08/18/214336/video-chinas-lunar-sample-return-spacewalk-and-space-station-docking-concepts-revealed.html]Flightglobal has obtained a promotional video from the Beijing based-China Academy of Space Technology (CAST), a prime contractor to China's space programme.
It shows computer generated video images (CGI) of a Shenzhou manned spacecraft docking with what could be a space station module, a Chinese astronaut emerging from a Shenzhou's orbital module using a Russian Orlan-DM like spacesuit and a lunar sample return rocket launching from the Moon's surface.[/url]
Arianespace: super rockets or super sales force?
Jean-Yves Le Gall, the CEO of Arianespace, has every reason to brag, as he did in the Paris newspaper Le Figaro on August 17th. He proudly points to the fact that his firm has launched something like two thirds of all the operational commercial satellites. Ariane has recovered nicely from its early trouble with the Ariane 5 and it seems that they will continue to dominate the commercial satellite market for the foreseeable future.
There are lots of reasons for this, but Americans should not kid themselves: Ariane is not successful because the Europeans—and especially the French—provide it with government subsidies. All of the world’s operational launchers are, to one extent or another, subsidized by governments. Perhaps, if Elon Musk’s SpaceX Falcon series of rockets is successful, we will see the first unsubsidized space access system in human history.
On the other hand, the Europeans should not fool themselves: Ariane is not a success because it is technically superior to its competitors. Getting satellites into orbit is not easy, but it does not require the high degree of what may be termed “elegant engineering” that goes into an Ariane. The Atlas and the Proton launch vehicles get the job done just as effectively.
Time for NASA to retire its aging shuttle fleet
http://www.azcentral.com/news/opinions/ … ins15.html
E.J. Perkins , editorial writer
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=23324
Exomars Exhibits Self-Control In Sampling Mars Terrain