New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#51 Re: Human missions » What are the chances of a President Trump funding Mars One? » 2015-10-13 09:02:57

I can't stand the man, and I hate Republicans. But Trump promises to leave the Middle East alone. Maybe he'll even stop spying on regular citizens in Europe....

He also says he'll step away from he propaganda war on Russia - and that would eventually filter through to us in Europe,. That would be helpful. The Russian counter sanctions have raised havoc with the food industry and farming in large parts of Europe.

I also like people who say it as it is - which Trump does. Better rude and realistic honesty than fake and dishonest political correctness.

Trump: 
“Sure, send people to Mars. Of course! Wonderful! Why not? But let’s fix the roads and bridges first, yes?”

Frankly - who can argue with this... There is horrible poverty in the US, the schools are disgrace and gun crime is everywhere.
If I was a US citizen, as much as I'd love to see a Mars mission, I think I'd agree with Trump's comment.

#52 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Communism - Just like Star Trek » 2015-10-13 08:40:59

At least I can argue my case based on the relevant literature, as opposed to stills from Star Trek!
Mars lovers in all countries — Unite!

#53 Re: Life support systems » Where on Mars do you think the first Human colony would be placed... » 2015-10-13 08:39:04

I am in awe of RobertDyck's and Void's responses.
Will have to read and re-read before I can say anything remotely on par with your excellent posts.
Thanks both!

#54 Re: Space Policy » US public opposed to spending money on human Mars missions » 2015-10-13 08:35:53

Void -OK on your ASPAC idea (as much as I hate the TPP initiative - perhaps that's the way things are going).

But the trouble for proud Americans with this idea is that China is likely to throw the most money on it, they may well be the ones manufacturing most of the hardware and they may possibly expect to take a lead as a result.
Can you live with that? Can the US?

Can China go it alone?  They did do their own space flight.... Maybe they can go to the Moon, as a "practice run" of a manned landing first, which would take them up to the same level of experience that the US has.

I don't think Russia could justify to its citizens, the expenditure of a Russian led Mars mission. So I don't think they will do it, at least not alone and within 15 years or so. Putin delivers mostly what the population wants - that's why he's so popular. He would not rock the boat with something as risky as Mars. There are plenty of cool prestige projects that need sorting internally in Russia that have more practical meaning than Mars. Russia has a lot of things going for it, but their plans for improving the country will take a couple of decades to bear fruit, assuming they work in the first place.
Possibly, Russia would consider a joint effort with China.

China is not a democracy and would not have to answer questions to voters about why they are spending billions on a Mars mission while people live in poverty.

The ESA - forget it, no. They wouldn't even be able to decide what language to speak on the mission, and the EU would be lucky to even survive another 15 years.

So my personal conclusion is that China is our best bet for a Mars mission. Perhaps with additional sponsoring from exposure-hungry tech companies with lots of spare cash. let's say, Google, Apple and some Asian technical company.

Overall I don't feel very optimistic right now. It feels like there's always something standing in the way for Mars.
Mars One seems to be dismissed by everyone remotely serious.

#55 Re: Not So Free Chat » [Movie] The Martian » 2015-10-13 08:16:38

Tom Kalbfus wrote:

Why wouldn't he be? Do you think just anybody could be an astronaut? You got to have the right stuff! Why don't you go apply for NASA's astronaut program if you think its easy to get in? The thing is, getting into space is expensive, they are not going to let just anybody become an astronaut. Astronauts typically have above normal intelligence, and there is something about each one which makes them stand a head above the rest. So you are going to have astronauts that have some unusual abilities, if they didn't have them, they wouldn't be astronauts!

1) I have never alluded to having any belief that I would qualify for NASA! Where did you get that from? I am the wrong nationality for starters, and it's downhill from there... So why attack me for something I have never even suggested?

2) I have never refuted that NASA astronauts are likely to have very high IQs. But just because a person has a high IQ doesn't make him a master engineer or mechanic by default! These professions require years and years of training, particularly to be at the level where you can instantly figure out how to fix equipment used for space travel. No amount of intelligence will replace years and years of specialist training and experience in these extremely complex and demanding fields. By his own admission, "The Martian" is a botanist, and nothing else. So I find it unlikely, regardless of how intelligent he is, that he can instantly perform at the level of a NASA flight engineer or mechanic.

#56 Re: Not So Free Chat » [Movie] The Martian » 2015-10-13 03:28:04

RobertDyck wrote:

Long story short, I have. Not the highest quality version, but I saw it. Pretty good! It has a giant spacecraft to go from Earth to Mars. For some reason Mars Pathfinder is within driving distance of the human Mars base location. It's a short-stay mission, also known as opposition-class, but NASA continues to talk about that. The NASA director is a control freak, willing to sacrifice an astronaut for how human space "looks" in the media. But there are precedents for that.

The good thing is it's an attempt to actually show what a real Mars mission would be. No space aliens, no fantasy technologies. The movie opened October 2nd; it's been a week already. You're a member of the Mars Society and haven't seen it yet? tongue

Don't know if anyone's read the book? I read it earlier this year...
It's interesting from the Mars perspective, but the quality of writing is square as can be. The guy is literally devoid of feelings, and because he's alone on Mars, the only human interaction is between the people on Earth.

I don't remember anything about NASA proposing to simply leave the guy to die on Mars, in the interest of not damaging the reputation of the space program. Perhaps it was added to make the film more dramatic.

Also, I had the same view of this book as I have of American action films where the hero is unbelievably lucky, has absolutely no inhibitions and pulls crazy stunts which wouldn't work in reality. There was too much of that in the book. Also the "McGyver" stuff - the guy was a living encyclopedia of how to jerry-rig absolutely anything. He's supposed to be a botanist, but he is performing repairs and modifications on the level of a top class engineer and mechanic.

I liked the concept though - it was a cool idea. But I thought it was too much macho, superhero stunts in it, to feel realistic.

#57 Re: Space Policy » US public opposed to spending money on human Mars missions » 2015-10-12 15:43:53

Yeah, interesting post, Void. I agree with you.

My main point was essentially that planning a journey to Mars requires

1 - Vision, motivation and drive that is not economically motivated.
2 - Commitment to see it through - it will probably need 10-15 years.

I'm just not seeing those qualities in the US right now.
They are more likely in Russia + Russia has existing facilities and know-how.

But mainly - it seems to me Asia and primarily China!

(As much as I would like it to be Europe or Russia that goes to Mars)

Democracy can be an obstacle to achieving the goal. The project needs a government that can set long term goals and stick to them without worrying about media turning the project, about having to do a re-election campaign in the middle of the project. Companies aren't democracies either, but they have to deliver return to shareholders every year...

All of this speaks for China, I think.  Mars would be the ultimate proof that China had really arrived....

Possibly EU - it's large enough, it has the skills and the Commission is not democratically elected. They can commit to large long term projects - the problem is reaching a consensus.

Too bad this isn't a project that can be open source and crowd-funded!
The very last thing I want to see is Mars being "claimed" by some corporation because they were there first...

#58 Re: Space Policy » US public opposed to spending money on human Mars missions » 2015-10-12 09:12:38

Tom Kalbfus wrote:

Imagine a space hotel which looked like this! How much would it cost?

Why go to space to stay at the Mariott.....
Plus, in order for it to look like that, it woud need artificial gravity!

As for lack of motivation and passion for Mars among Americans... Yes - because I Americans dreams are more about getting rich!  People in Russia love space, there is still a big excitement about it that I think is less prevalent in the US. I think there is a good chance that Russia gets back in the game. (Whether it can achieve results is another story! )

My outlook on the future of the US is negative. I think that country is going down the drain and that it won't be able to finance or commit to a project of the magnitude of going to Mars.

My guess of who goes to Mars, is an ambitious coalition of "newer" players on the political arena who want to prove something to their own citizens and the world. I.e.

—China
—Iran  (loves to show off technical skills and has potential to get very rich due to oil)
—Australia
—EU (if it survives the current crisis)
—Possibly Russia (once it's out of the current pinch and reasonably on top of domestic problems)
—Possibly various Asian tiger countries contributers.

I think the US lacks the vision or cohesiveness to pull it off. The US is driven by large corporation and an interest in quick profits. Mars isn't amenable to that. It would initially simply be about science, human curioosity and prestige.

I don't think anything of interest for Mars will come out of the Middle East, Latin America or Africa.

Another thing that speaks against the US are the frequent leadership changes.

Ambitious projects needs more stability and ideology to complete, than the US environment offers.

China's government is stable - they could commit to something long term and see it through.
Russia too, although Lord knows what will happen when Putin retires in the 2020s. Stability probably depends on whether a new strong leader will emerge on the scene.

Possibly nothing can happen at all, as there won't be enough space capable countries that are prepared to work with each other.

Perhaps corporations will play a larger role than space in the future, and someone like Google will become to first to go to space!

#59 Re: Life on Mars » Mars probably CANNOT support life » 2015-10-12 09:00:11

SpaceNut wrote:

It could see the human astronaut as a host; it could be a parasite, it could make us very sick ,,,,,

Yes, but the astronauts wouldn't touch them with their bare hands!

I kind of fail to get excited, scared or anything at all about some microbes!

I suppose the sci-fi horror scenario is that they go completely haywire once they come in contact with oxygen, water or carbonmonoxide (i.e. human habitat).
But really - that could be checked under controlled forms before anyone is exposed to risk, couldn't it? And they could be tested on monkeys, pigs or similar to see if they are parasitic or carries dangerous risks?

The whole "life on Mars" debate seems like much ado about nothing to me. Maybe I'm missing the point - but it won't be conscious life and it won't be able to harm us - so why worry?

#60 Life support systems » Where on Mars do you think the first Human colony would be placed... » 2015-10-12 08:54:20

martienne
Replies: 54

...and why?

What are the main factors to consider, in your view, and which location best fits your criteria?

#61 Re: Mars Gravity Biosatellite » Where does this stand now? » 2015-10-12 08:49:47

What would it actually take, in terms of energy, to get some form of gravity artificially simulated on the ISS?

Has the space station got the amount of energy available?  I mean, it requires running a massive centrifuge at an incredibly high speed....

So sad though, with all these great and exciting Mars related ideas that never seem to get off the ground...

#62 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Super-heavy Space Rocket Project in Russia(Successor to Buran/Energia) » 2015-10-12 08:44:21

Well it seems the drop in Oil price, and to some degree possibly sanctions put stop to Russia's latest space plans.

What a shame! Always something to derail things...   sad

#63 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Communism - Just like Star Trek » 2015-10-12 08:37:57

No, my dear Tom!
The communists are Picard, Janeway and the various crews.

Time and time throughout this franchise, the Captain of the different ships go on a bit of a rant about how the Federation has done away with money, eradicated poverty, dropped the concept of the nation state and achieved true equality.
What's this, if not communism?

These are the main goals of communism, and the signs of a society that has reached communism!

Communism was never reached in Eastern Europe as they never got close to doing away with money. As for the USSR, it went through "the dictatorship of the proletariat" for a while, it then things moved onto socialism / state capitalism. They never got particularly close to Communism.

Additionally in the Federation:
Women are clearly as emancipated as anyone could wish, and childcare seems to be a responsibilty of the collective. Communism, to some degree favours children raised collectively and independence for women (although never this radical feminism that has become the cause celebre for the "new left").

So there you have some more proof.

As for the Borg, they seem to exist to do the will of the Queen. Their behaviour is expansionist, imperialistic and destructive. Reminds me of a certain superpower I know, across the Atlantic...  Either way, typical capitalism.

#64 Re: Meta New Mars » Newmars Users » 2015-10-12 07:03:36

falkor wrote:

Marsman yes good comments and correct, for me being a member of a forum takes greater effort and commitment than being a Facebooker or a Twitterer

to me - we have a new generation of people, the vast majority of whom are used to sending a txt on their mobile phone, that is fast, brief and requires a minimum of effort

FAST and minimum of effort now seems to be the "test" and Facebook and Twitter can be seen for that

where are the posts on FB and Twitter that were made 1 year ago? where are the discussions on FB and Twitter that were made 1 MONTH AGO?

because Forums "demand" slightly more effort/ time and commitment than all other "popular" social media - they have dropped to the bottom of the pile hmm there's no going back it seems


I work in IT - setting up a forum is not really that difficult anymore. I did for another topic - in fact, it's a lot of fun to design and get the community started.

I am guessing that for this forum, the issue is that the owner hasn't found a good way to migrate the old posts to a more stable platform. Understandable that he/she wants to hang on to the material since there are some top class posts here. Information that it would be practically criminal to lose.

Another issue is time. Somebody who works full time and /or has a family may struggle to find the time to do maintenance and build up the community through regular participation.
Perhaps it would make sense to have an admin team, so that there are always a few backup people to fill in, as people's avaialbility go up and down.

Personally I much prefer forums of this type over Facebook, twitter etc.

1) Anything you write on Facebook is snooped on by NSA, GCHQ and others. If they wanted, they could build up a profile on you. On a forum, you can choose to access with a proxy and don't give up identifying information, thereby staying anonymous. People who may have inside information are more likely to share it. Inhibitions go away.

2) On Facebook people self censor, or try to seem smarter than they are when posting against their real life identities. 

3) Perhaps you don't want all your friends to know that you are a space-geek!

4) The format of traditional forums are more inclusive, open, efficient and easier to access than the same information on Facebook. The information can be tagged and better organised.

Traditional forums are better and I hope they will not be replaced by dumbed down social media.

#65 Re: Planetary transportation » Bikes on Mars? - Don't laugh! » 2015-10-12 06:51:22

Wouldn't the different gravity play tricks with the ability to balance on a bike?
For starters, the highest gear would be like riding on the lowest gear.

But the simplicity of the idea is beutiful. Imagine a cykle-path on Mars!

Cyklists would have to be careful though - falling and damaging environment suit would be dangerous.

#66 Re: Human missions » The Human body on Mars vs Earth » 2015-10-12 06:45:32

There must be some desalination treatment (pills) that can be routinely administered to humans, if it should turn out that there is an unhealthy buildup of salt in the body of individuals who live in lower gravity environments..
There is probably already some illness or another that leads to an unhealthy build-up of salts in the body.
A physician would no doubt know...

Perhaps nobody has been exposed long enough to spae conditions for research to look into this.
The person who spent the longest in space was a Russian, at the ISS.
I assume he's been thoroughly studied. Would be interesting to read up on what they found.

(It's true that saunas drive out a bit of salt (and other junk) from the body, but possibly not in sufficient quantities to be useful (?) It works for minor stuff though. I once managed to clear my body of any trace of something I'd smoked the day before, by doing an extremely long run, drinking some vinegar (!!!) and then spending 2 hours in the sauna. Traditional boarding school cure.
A bit hard to imagine a sauna on Mars - couldn't exactly be a traditional one...)

In sci-fi books, it seems to be common to assume that the body takes on different characteristics, for people who grow up in lower gravity. I.e. Mars trilogy and Expanse series.
But are they guessing or basing it on scientifical data + projections?

Another thing to consider is: These people will never be exposed to sunlight on their skin. That is needed to produce Vitamin D. Without it, people get sick and depressed. It's already a problem for black people in Northern climates, like Scandinavia. Their skin is doesn't absorb the existing sunlight well enough, and they have to take extra D vitamin.

A person on Mars would either have to simulate sunlight on the skin with a sun-lamp assuming that can "trick" the body, or take quite large doses of Vitamin D.

SpaceNut wrote:

The ISS twin comparison may lead to the exact nature of gravity and the changes that go on in the human body.

Where can we read about this?

#67 Re: Planetary transportation » Trains on Mars - Could a rail system provide martian need » 2015-10-11 16:30:53

prometheusunbound wrote:

Maybe in the early years the focus could be on developing long range railroads.  The advantages are enourmous.

   1.large masses could be transported with a modicum of energy.

   2.reliable.  The techology used in railroads has been on earth for 180 yrs, enough time to work out most of the bugs! 

   3.adaptable.  it does not take much effort to lay a railroad bed (although if a mining oparation occured, there would be a need for substaintal reinforcement of beds)  and almost any source of energy could be used to propel the train. .the tracks do not limit the type of train (except electric) on the tracks! 
 
   4.Cheap.  I'll grant the initial cost might seem a bit on the high side, but the tracks will last for 20-30 yrs of continuous use.  Don't forget martain gravity is less, making wear and tear less, too.  less wear and tear means less replacement, making it cheaper to run.

   5.verstile.  Anysort of cargo can be moved, including large, heavy and bulky pieces.  (mining, again, would most likly involve modification of track bed.

   6.fast.  It would be quicker than dune buggys for sure, never having to stop or slow down on the track.

I like this idea. Maybe a maglev/vacuum train? that's cool....

Or even just a regular train would be fast and simple to construct, and easy to run, perhaps powered with solar power.
Trains are proven to be reliable transportation in the harshest of conditions - i.e. Siberia, Alaska and Svalbard have train lines. A train can run on a variety of energy sources.

#68 Human missions » The Human body on Mars vs Earth » 2015-10-11 16:20:44

martienne
Replies: 10

Once a person got used to the gravity of Mars, alternatively if they were born on Mars and grew up there: Would they be able to adapt to life on Earth? Would they look different? What would it take for them to re-adjust to life on Earth?

#69 Re: Life on Mars » Mars probably CANNOT support life » 2015-10-11 16:02:05

From the point of view of potential future colonisers / inhabitants of Mars - does it matter whether there is some limited microbial life in some underground cave, or not? We already know there will be no animals, insects or vegetation...
What impact would basic life in underground nooks and crannies have, for colonisers?

#70 Re: Meta New Mars » NewMars.com Technical Error Reporting » 2015-10-11 15:57:47

I get the following error when I try to post with Firefox or Chrome. I had to use the obscure browser Seamonkey to post.

Info
Bad HTTP_REFERER. You were referred to this page from an unauthorized source. If the problem persists please make sure that 'Base URL' is correctly set in Admin/Options and that you are visiting the forum by navigating to that URL. More information regarding the referrer check can be found in the FluxBB documentation.


Another strange thing that happens here is: I have to log in TWICE in a row, in order to actually be logged in!

#71 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Communism - Just like Star Trek » 2015-10-11 15:55:24

Tom Kalbfus wrote:

"Space, the final frontier."
"These are the voyages of the Starship Proletariat."
"Who's Five Year plan is to seek to spread the Revolution of class struggle against the Borgeoise greedy capitalists exploiting the masses,
and to boldly overthrow those who have never been overthrown before!"

"You see unlike that other show, the comrade Captain and everyone else all wear red shirts, the result being that we have to replace our captain quite often as the aliens mistake him for some expendable extra."


Are you an NSA psy-ops agent with the objective to infiltrate the Mars community to spread US capitalist propaganda?

Imperialism, US exceptionalism or corporatism is in almost all your posts.

Give it a break with your 1950s CIA agitation!  McCarthy is dead and the US system is being exposed for what it is, thanks to Snowden, Wikileaks and Russia's comeback.

And for what it's worth Tom, Mars is RED. Get over it.

#72 Re: Not So Free Chat » Myers-Briggs Type Indicator » 2014-07-04 14:23:06

I don't know why you think this is "like horoscopes", or that one type would fit all.
That may be true for horoscopes, but for Myers-Briggs  - that's too specific.

The full test is expensive and takes over an hour, plus hours of follow-up seminars. Most people do that through work. But you could take a free, quick test and it will almost certainly produce the same result as the original. It did for me.

Do this one http://www.16personalities.com/free-personality-test and then a second one to confirm the accuracy. http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp

Anyone who is still at school/uni - bear this in mind. If you have a strongly introverted personality you may not love it in a very people oriented job, or in the middle of a management hierarchy with people at your back from below, above and the sides. (I should know). But you might be 10x better at certain other tasks than a person who constantly craves buzz and human interaction.
There are many more similar tips.

#73 Re: Not So Free Chat » Ukraine & Crimea » 2014-07-02 11:21:50

RobertDyck wrote:

@martienne: Sorry. I tried to argue with Tom. But he's intransigent. In the end I asked JoshNH4H to ban Tom from this discussion thread. After all, I started it. Josh responded that he can't ban anyone from one particular thread.

I grew up during the 1960s and 1970s, during the Cold War. We citizens lobbied our government for decades to end the Cold War. It finally did end. We certainly don't want it to come back. But certain warmongers appear determined to bring it back. Showing disrespect for another country is a sure way back to Cold War, or worse "Hot" war.

This affects the Mars Society because we want to go to Mars. There were proposals to use Energia long before me. And Russian rocket engines are used by Atlas V and Antares launch vehicles. Yuzhmash factory in east Ukraine manufactures Zenit rockets used by Sea Launch, as well as the first stage of Antares.

And I am worried that those from CIS countries would treat Tom's comments as representative of all of us.

Sadly, based on the opinions displayed by most members here -- ranging from patronising or condescending to downright hateful towards Russia, no Russian person will eventually want to have anything to do with the USA in terms of space travel. Same would go for Kazakhstan and Belarus where people consider Russia their closest ally.

When looking for international partners for space endeavours, Russia will have no choice but to look elsewhere; a person/group/nation can only put up with so much mistreatment, attempt at bullying and outright hostility. It's a pity because culturally Russia has more in common with Europe/USA than Asian nations, but in the current climate China would still be a more attractive partner, or perhaps India or Brazil.

The US and its obedient EU puppets is repeatedly proving that it is applying a double standard with regards to Russia. The US can intervene and invade anywhere it likes. Russia hasn't actually intervened in Ukraine, right on its doorstep, but is still accused of somehow being in error.

The US has shown that it cannot keep its word on political promises it makes, or be trusted financially, militarily or in any other meaningful way. It is prepared to go to any length to further its agenda, including right on Russia's doorstep, while breaking agreements regarding NATO expansion and bullying Russia's European business partners into reneging on valuable contracts and long standing business agreements. Trusting the US on anything, is foolish - it is not just untrustworthy but downright solicitous.

Fortunately Russia is in a position that it can re-orient itself Eastwards, and that will be what will happen.

People outside of the USA/Europe as well as many Europeans are also beginning to see through the actions of the USA, feel revulsion about the destructive reign of the the USA ruining one country after another with invasions or meddling.

My feelings about this right now, is that Russia ought to cut co-operation with the US in space. Why co-operate with someone who behaves the way the US does? Have some dignity, Russia!

Go it alone, put the space programme to rest for a while, or get another partner. Let the US build its own rockets and space station if it still has any skills within the country, or money to pay for it. If not, tough luck, and treat your partners a bit more respectfully next time! For Russia to co-operate with somebody who is prepared to behave like a civilised partner and not an international bully, war-mongerer, propagandist and worldwide destroyer or nations.

Frankly, I think the thought of being stuck on Mars with a bunch of Americans is not a thought that appeals to any Russians in their right mind at the moment.
It's too bad on intelligent and nice Americans who realise what their government is like. But enough is enough!

#74 Re: Not So Free Chat » Ukraine & Crimea » 2014-07-02 06:17:29

People here writing kilometers of text on a country they do not understand, have never visited and don't speak the language of.

Based on angled news articles, dictionary entries and Wikipedia.
Some take every opportunity to try to "shine" with their "insights" about matters like WW2 or old European history.
Add to that cold war prejudice, misinformation and re-gurgitated propaganda (yes, the West does that, and much better than the USSR ever did).

The ARROGANCE, ignorance and stupidity displayed in some comments here, is shocking.

This has nothing to do with anyone in North America and the US has already done more than enough damage with its meddling.

I am SOOOO disappointed to see people that I thought were visionary, intelligent and cosmopolitan - i.e. Mars fans - to display such provincial narrow-mindedness, prejudice and susceptibility to propaganda.

#75 Re: Not So Free Chat » Ukraine & Crimea » 2014-06-19 18:50:30

If the guy grew up in Lviv, he is just about as extreme a Ukrainian nationalist as they come.
It's known across the whole ex USSR as the nazi town.
If that's your source, and you prefer to trust him, I won't waste my time.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB