You are not logged in.
I encourage everyone to google about what happens when you treat tubercolisis with steroids. A friend's elderly mother died because the doctors thought she had asthma and gave her steroids (which is appropriate for asthma). TB hevaen - - the disease exploded. On the other hand, treating asthma with antibiotics is harmless but ineffectual.
Have we diagnosed Islamo-fascism correctly and is our current course of treatment helping or hurting?
Of course to discuss this is treason since as no should dare criticize our Precious Leader. After all, he is following the guidance of his Heavenly Father and therefore cannot err.
= = =
Islamo-fascism breeds on martyrs and it is fueled by pride, male pride. Iraq also has a tribal culture which says "You kill my cousin, my pride requires that I kill one of yours" - - so what so we do? Shrug off collateral damage as unavoidable and inflict daily humiliations.
Hitting them weakly makes them stronger. Better off to not hit them at all than hit weakly. Kill one? Better to kill them all OR send in sufficient firepower that no one dare challenge us.
Ooops we can't suggest that Rumsfeld miscalculated, can we.
I read today about an American officer who wondered where all these suicide bombers are coming from. If my steroids/TB analogy is accurate, then I know exactly where they are coming from and there will be more and more volunteer martyrs until the last US solldier evacuates from the roof of the embassy just like in 1975.
= = =
Edit - - In the case of my friend's mother-in-law, the doctors kept insisting they knew what they were doing, how dare a lay person question their judgment.
Edited By BWhite on 1118931332
Gravity induced terminal velocity is terminal velocity, right?
Actually, no, terminal velocity is a function of air resistance... there is no air in space, hence, no air resistance. The projectile can build up a lot more speed, much of which will be bled off by friction on re-entry, but it will still hit faster than otherwise.
Yup. okay. I see that. 155s? Those guys were big, weren't they?
Okay, but down from orbit is not straight down - - lots of sideways momentum to offset - - I suppose the math on final velocities depends on a huge number of variables. 50,000 feet or 75,000 feet or a sub-orbital ballistic missile will achieve some pretty high impact velocities.
Now, if Blue Team has "rods from God"
then the Red Team bunker should include some cavities and mixed density materials above the real bunker and maybe put the vital bits inside an hardened concrete inverted "v" to attempt to deflect the projectile away from the essential target.
False cavities also allow for bad intel and maybe give Red Team some wins.
Given launch costs, a "lawn dart from the heavens" that destroys a false cavity costs Blue a whole lot of money for nothing.
Actually, the whole "Rods From God/Lawn Darts From Hell" weapon system could probably be most cheaply implemented by mounting them on top of decommissioned ballistic missiles. Just how many secret underground nuclear complexes do you need to destroy? We happen to be taking the nukes of some of those missiles anyways, might as well do something useful with the booster, and people won't get as exercised about "OMG weapons in space!" if it's stay in space is only a few minutes long.
I recall reading that in Gulf War I, worn out cannon barrels (37mm? 75mm?) were filled with explosive and modified to strike nose first with the hardened steel of the barrel directing the blast like a shaped charge. These busted bunkers previously deemed unreachable.
Apparently an F-16 could carry it under its wing, it just took off a little "tilted" from the extra weight.
Instead of orbiting spent uranium, take a used 120 mm tank gun barrel from an M1 tank (or if you have a Very Large Aircraft - an 8 inch or 16 inch naval gun barrel) and fill with the most powerful conventioanl explosive and make a masonry nail to drop from 50,000 feet.
Gravity induced terminal velocity is terminal velocity, right?
= = =
Two space writers - - Oberg and Dwayne Day - - have recently told both sides to just stop getting excited about space weapons because the USAF just cannot do (technically that is) what some junior officers lust after doing.
"a noble lie"
Should we fake a moon landing?
More along the lines of "we need a Mars colony first so that 95% solar system isn't speaking Mandarin in 2475" kind of story.
I like your idea, but I like my idea (we need a meta-narrative - - even if its a noble lie) more.
What meta-narrative? It is too many things for too many people.
Any meta-narrative that has "and then humanity went to the Moon and Mars, to stay" as the next chapter after the chapter we are living now.
Imagine being a writer of history in 2205 or 2375. Why did we of this century venture beyond Earth?
http://www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0060391 … link]Story is King - - what's the story?
I like your idea, but I like my idea (we need a meta-narrative - - even if its a noble lie) more.
*I'm wondering what -the- pretext for the weaponization of space will be; the actual starting point which will justify what follows.
Probably will start with the point made in the article: Protection of commercial/unarmed satellites.
And of course the protection factor will be "overkill."
--Cindy
Dont]http://www.transterrestrial.com/archives/005369.html#005369]Don't Panic
Space exploration needs a media-savvy advocate.
Turn NASA TV into Space Reality TV.
Watch the Astronauts get picked, go through training, fail and succeed.
All the way to blast off.
Nah.
The real story, humanity taking its first baby steps towards becoming a genuine spacefaring species, will sell - - > no problem.
Back in 1970 everyone knew that the Apollo race was over and was not heading towards permanent settlement. Apollo 12 and thereafter? Yawn. Why? It wasn't going to be permanent.
= = =
Another aphorism:
Good stories, well told, always sell. Always.
Zero gee dissection of frogs on board an ISS going endlessly in circles ain't a good story.
Never pick a political fight with a guy who buys his ink by the barrel. And electrons are even cheaper.
= = =
Space exploration needs a media-savvy advocate.
What if. . .
What if Rupert Murdoch did a 180 and cleaned house at the FOX network and told all the replacements to http://www.observer.com/pages/frontpage5.asp]support Hillary Clinton in 2008?
Won't happen. I'm just saying "what if"
http://thinkprogress.org/index.php?p=1100]Link:
Freshly-released autopsy results reveal that Terri Shiavo was blind:
Pinellas-Pasco Medical Examiner Jon Thogmartin concluded that…her brain was about half of normal size when she died. …
Thogmartin says her brain was “profoundly atrophied” – and that the damage was “irreversable.” He also says, “The vision centers of her brain were dead” – meaning she was blind.
Which makes Dr. Frist’s expert “diagnosis” all the more outrageous:
Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), a renowned heart surgeon before becoming Senate majority leader, went to the floor late Thursday night for the second time in 12 hours to argue that Florida doctors had erred in saying Terri Schiavo is in a “persistent vegetative state.”
“I question it based on a review of the video footage which I spent an hour or so looking at last night in my office,” he said in a lengthy speech in which he quoted medical texts and standards.“She certainly seems to respond to visual stimuli.”
Wow, that gives me great confidence in the judgment of our Senate Majority Leader. :;):
= = =
From the Daily Show:
"You really shouldn't do this at home, but based on this video examination, Bill Frist is in a Persistent Vegetative State" ~ Jon Stewart
Edited By BWhite on 1118854708
This is interesting. . .
In addition, the emergency escape system was moved from the top of the spacecraft to the launch vehicle adapter. This way, during a nominal flight, emergency escape engines would be used for final orbital insertion maneuver, providing extra weight savings.
The other option spoken of, the one with no Ukrainian parts, would be to take the current R-7 Soyuz rocket and swap out its old kerosene upper stage for a liquid hydrogen engine.
http://www.russianspaceweb.com/kliper.html]Onega?
From this link:
According to the original plans, the Kliper would be launched on top of a yet-to-be developed Onega booster -- a heavily modified Soyuz rocket -- with no payload fairing but with the emergency escape rocket attached to the nose section of the reentry capsule. The emergency escape system, resembling that of the Soyuz spacecraft, would be capable of pulling the crew capsule away from the launch vehicle at every stage of the launch and orbit insertion.
A successful development of the Onega booster and its launch infrastructure would be one of the most challenging and expensive aspects of the project. Also, the decision to base the project on the expendable booster would limit economic viability of the reusable spacecraft. The Onega booster, could be launched from upgraded Soyuz facilities in Baikonur, Plesetsk and, potentially, French Guiana.
Given virtually nonexistent chances of obtaining funding for the Onega, RKK Energia considered the Zenit booster with similar capabilities. The most advanced vehicle in the Soviet rocket fleet, the Zenit was essentially banished from the Russian space program, when the collapse of the USSR left its prime manufacturer in the newly independent republic of Ukraine. Yet, in the case of Kliper, technical pragmatism outweighed political considerations. By August 2004, the company essentially committed to "re-tailor" the Kliper for the Zenit. The spacecraft had to shed around 1.5 tons from its total mass and around one ton from the mass of its reentry capsule. In addition, the emergency escape system was moved from the top of the spacecraft to the launch vehicle adapter. This way, during a nominal flight, emergency escape engines would be used for final orbital insertion maneuver, providing extra weight savings.
DoD is giving them a chance.
DoD should like it. That 23% dummy could be an ASAT easily enough.
*To what extent? Aren't some speed laws created to protect the citizenry, i.e. can't drive 55 mph on residential streets?
Quite some time ago the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration came up with something called the "85th percentile rule" for determinign speed limits. Eseentially the idea was that for any given stretch of road, the only fair and reasonable way to determine what should be the posted limit is to track a large number of cars driving it under normal conditions and the posted limit should be no lower than 85 percent of drivers would drive in the absence of any limit.
There were also guidelines about fines and not using them to feed the police or courts.
All of it has been largely ignored, most speed limits are essentially "road taxes". A means to increase revenue. Police budget a little tight? Camp out near unrealistically low posted limits and rake in the dough.
They always tell us it's for our protection, sometimes it's even true. But usually there's something else.
This is also why the "War on Drugs" won't end any time soon. Too many counties like those Corvettes and Porsches they get to confiscate. :;):
Building (and maintaining) a smooth running society is what allowed the wealthy to get wealthy in the first place.
Depending on how the wealth was acquired. By all means, tax dividends and interest.
But taxing wages is theft, pure and simple.
I am more sympathetic to this view than it might seem but I also think this view wouldn't go over well with the reverse Robin Hoods we have in Washington, right now.
Instead of taxing millions of poor people, let's trick them into signing deals with MBNA for 23% interest plus 5% per month overlimit and late fees. 83% per year interest?
Its a good deal if the government will supply the courthouses and the laws to allow you to garnish paychecks and collect it.
= = =
The simple truth is that well crafted regulations (like zoning laws) enhance wealth even if badly crafting regulations (like zoning laws) can stifle a local economy.
Public infrastructure investment can raise real wages - - sewers good roads, cable line, power grids.
Public access wi-fi broadband (taxpayer based OR municipal run not-for-profit co-operative) is an interesting situation pitting the potential for public good versus profits for Comcast and the DSL providers.
Usury laws and bankruptcy laws keep workers productive and out of the all cash black markets. What's good for MBNA isn't necessarily good for America.
= = =
Tax capital and not labor?
Watch out! George W. Bush will denounce you soon enough, dude, as some sort of libertarian-anarchist.
I think there is such a thing as altruism. I’ve seen it, I’ve practiced it. And yes, there is a selfish motive to it. It’s the way it makes you feel. It feels good, but then, not many people learn to like that feeling. [shrug] Glad I’m not one of them.
Booyah! You've hit the very heart of it!
The problem is that a certain political persuasion believes that being generous with other people's money to make themselves feel good is the right thing to do.
By all means help out the poor unfortunate souls of the world, savor the feeling of having done something noble. But remember, stealing from others to get that feeling is no different from your scout master stealing from the trough for the good feeling of snorting coke.
Building (and maintaining) a smooth running society is what allowed the wealthy to get wealthy in the first place.
To not tax the wealthy allows them to freeload.
= = =
I recall the libertarian Mundaka being all happy that the jerk who smashed his truck and his telescope was in violation of mandatory auto insurance laws. Mandatory auto insurance? How libertarian is that? :;):
Edited By BWhite on 1118844164
Now that reminds me of the thermic wind turbine project in Australia. Only that they simply build a glass top over a huge surface with a mile high chimney in the middle. It also can be made to work at night by covering parts of the surface with water that stores heat during the day and releases it at night.
It has a somewhat higher investment cost per Watt than coal plants, but is more cost effective on the long run.
That's the exact project I have in mind. We discussed it at length here a few months/years ago.
Add heat sinks and large solar reflectors outside the perimeter and it seems to me you can turbo-charge the thing. .
They did. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darth_Maul]Then Darth Vader kills him.
Like I said, I'd love to be at that meeting.
shuttle_guy is a poster at space.com who apparently works for NASA at Kennedy on the shuttle (d'oh!)
He posted this comment over there:
An input from a credible source at MSFC...
Jim Snoddy's team has generated a negative assessment of the EELV options for the CEV launcher. They would be required to meet the NASA structural safety factor of 1.4 for human-rating. Both the Delta IV and Atlas V are currently rated at 1.25 structural safety margin. This increase in the structural safety margin would require a requalification program for the EELVs. MSFC has generated cost estimates for these structural mods along with various performance upgrades to achieve the CEV lift capability. This is being used as a basis for ecommending the SDLV In-Line Medium launcher for the CEV.
It true, this is called building a case. . .
Edited By BWhite on 1118777039
"Silly chimpanzees"
Great phrase, I think I will steal it. . .
http://aviationnow.ecnext.com/free-scri … 45]Thiokol says they can fly CEV by 2010.