New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by noosfractal

#576 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Un- conventional ways to LEO » 2006-09-16 19:57:18

How about ...

   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_propulsion

( although MX Tethers totally rock!  Oh yes they do.  Space elevator motivated research into CNT tethers just bring them closer.  Muhahaha. )

#577 Re: Human missions » Ares and Ares » 2006-09-16 13:38:36

From there it will be possible to snake out tendrils to heat the volatiles which will be collected and allow the tendrils to dig in further.

I'm having a hard time visualizing how robotic tendrils might work.  Are there any protoypes/references you could point me to that would help?

#578 Re: Human missions » Ares and Ares » 2006-09-16 13:34:08

By "miner" I presume you mean a robotic, remote-presence machine operated in shifts by the crew of a prospecting vehicle situated near the asteroid in queastion, eh?

Yes, except that I would advocate significant expenditure to develop adequate telepresence technology (i.e., that copes with the up to an hour round trip communications time) so that the operators can be situated on Earth, and later Mars, rather than near the target asteroid.  However, I do appreciate that the high level of automation required for this may not be achievable in the near future.

#579 Re: Human missions » Ares and Ares » 2006-09-15 15:04:56

I would like to have some discussion here regarding mining asteroids from the inside out.

If the asteroid rotates, then a shaft dug parallel to the surface would have a "floor" to work against due to centrifugal force. 

If you were only just below the surface, you push out the "floor" from below you (or some of it anyway) and it would fly out to a waiting orbiter. 

Oh, I like it - using the asteroid's own rotational energy to dismantle it. 

Hey, if you attach a standard electric generator at a pole of rotation, you'll get your electrical energy for free - maybe we could use gigawatt lasers to carve it up.

#580 Re: Human missions » Ares and Ares » 2006-09-15 14:25:47

What about using the momentum of ejected ore to keep the drill bit against the asteroid surface?

The ore stream would then be caught in a net or bag and eventually towed back to Earth. I really don't see onsite refining at first.

That would take an awful lot of power to exert the thrusts required to make such a drill work

I think the required thrust perpendicular to the surface is fairly modest for this type of drill - the deep drilling guys use this sort of drill and don't exert much force through the drilling shaft beyond its own weight.  Also, as noted by Tom below, once the shaft is started, you can use tracks or the like to keep burrowing.

nor would it provide the initial thrust required to start the drilling shaft.

Right, you need thrusters to get going.

And, if you capture the rock and dust, won't that blow the orbiter into space with similar thrust? "Whoops"

Edit: The recieving orbiter vehicle would need to burn as much rocket fuel as your drill would need to just push down with a rocket. No where near efficient enough.

Two ideas here. 

The first is that the orbiter will be collecting mass so that the added momentum of the ore stream will accelerate it less and less.  If you don't mind that the orbiter is getting further away (it does have to return to Earth at some point after all) then you can just plan for the vector that the ore stream will add.

If that doesn't work, then perhaps it would be again possible to use ejected ore to counter the vector.  I'll assume the orbiter has access to more power than the miner.  If the orbiter can accelerate 1% of the received ore to 100 times the velocity of the ore stream (or 10% of the received or to 10 times the velocity, etc), then it can remain in relative position while still collecting ore.

Then you have the problem of the valuble water ice and other volitiles boiling off now that you've so convienantly crushed the ore and thrown it into space, to be captured in a big open-to-vacuum bag, probably exposed to the sunlight too.

There is sure to be some loss, but I don't think it'll be 100%.  We can improve on efficiency later, I'm just trying to think of something that is cheap and will get a load of whatever is valuable.  The bag may have to be more of a funnel to a collection point, particularly for volatiles.

And this kind of drill probably won't work with a nearly solid metal asteroid if you are wanting to harvest metals.

Are some really solid metals and not some sort of compound ore?  Wow.  No, I don't think this drill would work for that scenario.  I guess it'd be brittle because of the low temperature.  Maybe you could shatter it first with a shaped explosion directed through a plane some yards below the surface you want to mine.  Hard to automate though.

Probably your best bet would be to blow hot CO over the metal to extract via a carbonyl, but the added complexity is horrible.

I really don't see onsite refining at first.

Pobably not, but what about the water and other volitiles?

You are probably right about the volatiles, but the refining effort isn't too bad because of the free vacuum.

#581 Re: Human missions » Totally commercially funded "Mars Direct"... » 2006-09-14 17:07:24

And any thoughts on start rolling the ball ourselves? smile

Start with a reality TV show called "Mars Underground" where space boffins rave passionately about the technological, political and spiritual implications of a manned mission to Mars, with occasional drop-in appearances by NASA admin, senators, celebrities, and dot-com billionaires.  End with the triumphant conclusion that it is possible with the support of the viewing public: "watch TV, send a manned mission to Mars."  Proceed to the second series in which we begin the Olympian mars-o-naut selection process.  No lose proposition.

#582 Re: Human missions » Ares and Ares » 2006-09-12 20:24:38

No! You are still thinking like you are on a body with gravity: a digging scoop or a grapple requires force to penitrate into the ground in order to get the digging implement around the dirt, which you don't have! The grapple will not even penitrate the ground!

What about using the momentum of ejected ore to keep the drill bit against the asteroid surface?

I'm imagining a drill bit like this ...

drill_bit_new_03.jpg

only larger, and perhaps more spinning bits around the edge of the torus.  The spinning bits would direct the ore through the center of the torus and then there would be further spinning cylinders (perhaps plastic-coated or the like) inside a tube whose role is to accelerate the ore towards a waiting orbiter.  The ore stream would then be caught in a net or bag and eventually towed back to Earth.  I really don't see onsite refining at first.

#583 Re: Exploration to Settlement Creation » Mars Design & Architecture - ...(how do you visualize it?) » 2006-09-12 14:21:29

Full-on-view.s.jpg

Behold, the future!  lol

An important aspect of the above design, like the Mars habs, is that it is on stilts so that the frozen ground doesn't suck all the heat out of the structure.  Building underground means you have more contact, not less.  Domes are better, but you still have the contact problem.  Perhaps we should be thinking in terms of spheres-on-stilts?

sphere_becher.tank.lg.jpg

#585 Re: Not So Free Chat » Bow Down Before Iran? » 2006-09-10 23:48:54

Noosfractal, if that source is inadequate can you find me a good source of what the Ayatollah and Osama Bin Laden are saying now?

One good source?  Nope.  Media polarization is worse than at any time since the end of Cold War I.  You've got to read multiple sources to get any sort of balance.  I use http://news.google.com/ If you really want one source, then the http://www.csmonitor.com/ is probably your best bet.  Of course, no matter what you read, you're not going to find them saying nice things, but it might help you chill out a notch or two.

#586 Re: Human missions » Ares and Ares » 2006-09-10 23:06:22

Extracting anything from any asteroid any time this half of the century is a complete and total fairy tale.

What's the big roadblock?  Technical?  Political?  Economic?  All of the above?

#587 Re: Not So Free Chat » Bow Down Before Iran? » 2006-09-10 14:24:58

John, you are quoting from a tabloid.  They deliberately write inflammatory articles to sell more papers.

This is not to say that the Iranian leadership hasn't been handing them gift after gift of late.

#588 Re: Not So Free Chat » Bow Down Before Iran? » 2006-09-09 18:59:06

China doesn't have a dog in the Middle East fight

China needs, and has contracted for, the vast majority of Iranian oil.  This is one of the reasons that Iran is being so bold. 

Another is that they believe that they are the chosen people of God.  But then who doesn't believe that?

#589 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Relativity drive: The end of wings and wheels? » 2006-09-09 12:25:19

‘You can’t beat the laws of physics. If it is used to accelerate, the Q value drops. It is best used to lift a body and oppose a force, for instance to counteract gravity. It cannot be used to accelerate further.’

Translation: I am a scam artist.

The Tajmar result has gotten everyone excited, research dollars are starting to flow, and these scam artists are putting their hands up for a share.  It's sickening.  I hope they go to jail for fraud.

#590 Re: Terraformation » Terrform Venus » 2006-08-28 01:36:03

guys I`m talking about kinda tamed / cathalized coronal mass ejection...

karov, this is awesome.  I've been thinking about this all week.

Now, please invent the plasma-management hardware!!!

I'm reading up on solar dynamics to get a feel for the figures, but here is the basic idea: create a magnetic lens in heliostationary orbit with current running through dusty plasma "coils" maintained by one or more (relatively small) coil generators spinning around the center of the lens.  The center of the lens could simply be the center of gravity of the coil generator swarm, or, the coil generators could be tethered , for example, in pairs.  The diameter of the lens would be tens of thousands of kilometers.  The coil generators not only generate the dusty plasma that constitutes the coils, but also the electric current that (by flowing through the dusty plasma coil) generates the magnetic field that focuses the proton wind.  Once focused, the proton stream is directed into a Venetian counter-orbit to be swepted up by the planet as it moves through its year.

This would be a passive mechanism.  I haven't even begun to think about teasing out additional mass, but that is a great idea as well - perhaps we could create a kind of lighting-rod for coronal mass ejections with high energy EMPs.

#591 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Space Elevators, Ho! - carbon nanotube growth breakthrough! » 2006-08-27 23:52:26

The ultrastrong, lightweight carbon-nanotube fiber, branded SuperThread(tm) by the company, can have better properties than steel for many applications and could soon be the primary substance from which airplanes, automobile parts, and sports equipment are made. Initial tests show that SuperThread is pound for pound (for the same weight) one-hundred times stronger than steel and less than one-fortieth the weight.

http://www.lanl.gov/news/index.php?fuse … ry_id=8855

8)

#592 Re: Meta New Mars » Spammer » 2006-08-24 23:09:42

Actually, I found out the other day why they do this.  Google's ranking algorithm weights links from popular bulletin boards particularly highly, and the googlebot visits the boards often.  It is really quite a complement to be spammed so much  smile

#593 Re: Human missions » Privately Funded Mission--Get On With It! » 2006-08-24 08:03:21

pledges

maybe a hybrid pledge scheme like the lifeboat guys - http://lifeboat.com/

#594 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Followup on the Heim Drive » 2006-08-18 00:28:02

Has anyone considered the dynamic effects caused by the displaced air due to the radially outward force from the torus.

If a radial force does create a significant airstream, you could run it over an airfoil and use it to create lift.

#595 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Followup on the Heim Drive » 2006-08-18 00:17:49

Here is the original article - http://science.howstuffworks.com/electr … ulsion.htm

That article uses traditional physics to explain how that form of propulsion would work.

Nah - it violates conservation of momentum under traditional physics (it doesn't push or pull against anything).  For this to work you need to be able to tap ZPE or something equally bizarre.  See ...

Propellantless Propulsion by Electromagnetic Inertia Manipulation - Brito, 1999
http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/Research/0994.pdf

#596 Re: Intelligent Alien Life » Lunatic Fringe » 2006-08-17 23:25:01

how can we avoid their dreadful fate?

#597 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Followup on the Heim Drive » 2006-08-17 16:15:39

I'll admit, I myself am dubious about that  incredibly small acceleration.  It seems as though it would take an eternity for a spacecraft to lift off the surface.

The most recent paper has the z-acceleration proportional to the square of rotational velocity and the "gravitophoton field."  Some particular parameters - v = 10 m/s and, to generate the field, 100 windings, 1-2 Amps and a solenoid diameter of 0.1 meters - yeild a z-acceleration of 4.0x10^-4 g.

We need four orders of magnitude to get to a z-acceleration of 4g.  We can get two orders by taking the rotational velocity up to 100 m/s and probably another couple by upping the solenoid windings and the current, or some convenient combination thereof.  Hence "feasible with current technology."

#598 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Followup on the Heim Drive » 2006-08-17 13:09:23

I’ll read close the details later tonight and insert the necessary equations.

You might want to work from the later paper.  Tajmar provided more info causing Droscher & Hauser to revise their equations.

#599 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Followup on the Heim Drive » 2006-08-17 02:25:12

The paper even said that you can’t use the gravity machine as a space ship drive.

My reading of section 7.1.3 ... "From these numbers it seems to be possible that, if our theoretical predictions are correct, the realization of a workable space propulsion device that can lift itself from the surface of the Earth seems to be feasible with current technology" ... is that you can.

To bad my electromagnetism knowledge is getting fuzzy because the math looks really similar.

Yep.  My understanding is that they're saying you generate gravity just like you generate electricity - rotation in a magnetic field.  The constants are different, so we haven't noticed it before.

#600 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Followup on the Heim Drive » 2006-08-16 01:29:24

I didn’t get all the connections like the relevance of discrete space to electromagnetic gravitational coupling.

So physics has general relativity (GR) for the large scale (gravity and the shape of spacetime) and quantum theory for the small scale (pretty much everything else), but the two don't meet in the middle.  Naturally there has been a search for a unified field theory, i.e., something that predicts the behavior of quantized gravity/spacetime (recall GR says "gravity = the shape of spacetime").  String theory is the favorite (actually brane theory nowadays), but ...

Now Tajmar is saying that he has generated a gravitation effect 10^17 greater than that predicted by GR, i.e., he is saying that he has found where GR breaks down at the small scall.  The excitement is that Droscher & Hauser are saying that not only did Tajmar not make a mistake, but that EHT (a string theory competitor) predicts his results to ridiculous accuracy.

The paper did mention warp drives and I am not sure if they were inserted because they are cool, or because there are novel ways in EHT to produce such warp drives.

Because "gravity = the shape of spacetime" if you can generate gravity, you can change the shape of spacetime, i.e., a gravity drive is a warp drive.

As for the propellantless propulsion application, it's like trying to predict the performance of a modern rocket with only knowledge of the first Chinese fireworks.

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by noosfractal

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB