New Mars Forums

Based on recent SpaceX flights, the white residue on Starship's nose cone after reentry is from ablative insulation material that became exposed to the high heat of atmospheric entry. This occurred in areas where SpaceX deliberately removed some of the protective tiles for testing.
For example, after a late August 2025 flight, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk confirmed that the discoloration was the result of a thermal protection system experiment.
The purpose of the experiment
Testing different heat shield designs: SpaceX has been experimenting with various thermal protection configurations. On recent flights, the company has intentionally removed some of Starship's heat shield tiles to test different materials, including metallic tiles, and to see if other systems can compensate for missing tiles.
Exposing the insulation: In the areas where the tiles were removed, the underlying white ablative insulation was directly exposed to the high-temperature plasma of reentry.
Creating a white vapor deposit: The extreme heat caused some of this insulation material to vaporize. This vapor then re-condensed as a white coating on the cooler sections of the nose cone.
A different kind of test
The ablative insulation that appeared white after reentry is a departure from the polished steel Starship prototypes. For certain operational versions, like the Human Landing System (HLS) for the moon, a white thermal coat will be used. This is done to reflect sunlight and help with temperature regulation while in space. However, the post-reentry white residue is a byproduct of a specific experimental process, not the intended final coloration

AI Overview
Starship turned orange after re-entry due to experimental metallic heat shield tiles that oxidized, forming iron oxide. This orange color is a result of these metallic test tiles reacting with atomic oxygen in the atmosphere at high speeds, while white patches were from deliberately removed tiles exposing white insulation. This discoloration indicates the success of these new metallic tiles and insulation testing during Flight 10, with Elon Musk confirming the phenomenon was intended to observe these materials.
Details of the Orange Coloration
Metallic Test Tiles:
The primary cause of the orange coloration was the use of experimental metallic heat shield tiles on the flight.
Oxidation:
These metallic tiles, likely stainless steel, oxidized rapidly during re-entry at Mach 25, reacting with the atmospheric oxygen to form a distinct orange, iron oxide layer.
Intended Experiment:
SpaceX deliberately placed these metallic tiles in specific areas and intentionally removed some ceramic tiles to expose the underlying insulation.
White Areas and Insulation
Deliberate Removal:
The white areas seen on Starship are from areas where the standard ceramic heat shield tiles were intentionally removed to test the white insulation beneath.
White Insulation:
This insulation, made of heat-resistant composites, was designed to withstand re-entry temperatures and reflect heat. Unlike the metallic tiles, it did not contain easily oxidizable metals, causing it to retain its white color.
Significance of the Event
Testing and Reusability:
The orange discoloration is not a sign of failure; rather, it's a visual indication of SpaceX's ongoing material science experiments to develop and test new thermal protection systems for future Starship missions, aiming for increased reusability.
Confirmation of Success:
Elon Musk confirmed that the heat shield tiles largely stayed attached, suggesting the latest upgrades are performing well, despite the unusual colors.

A "hot chimney updraft pipe" is the central component of a chimney system where an updraft, or the upward flow of hot exhaust gases, is created and maintained. This upward movement is driven by the principle that hot air is less dense than cold air, causing it to rise.
How the updraft works
The updraft is the engine of a chimney, pulling smoke and combustion gases out of a building and supplying the fire with fresh oxygen.
Temperature difference: The heat from a fire warms the air and gases inside the chimney, making them lighter than the cooler air outside. This temperature difference causes the hot, lighter air to rise.
Pressure difference: The rising hot air creates a negative pressure (low-pressure area) inside the chimney, which pulls air from the firebox and the surrounding area upward. Meanwhile, higher-pressure atmospheric air is pushed into the appliance's air intake, feeding the fire with oxygen.
Continuous cycle: This process establishes a continuous cycle of airflow that ensures smoke and dangerous carbon monoxide are vented safely outside.
Factors affecting the updraft
Several factors can influence the strength and reliability of a chimney's updraft:
Chimney height: A taller chimney generally produces a stronger updraft because it increases the pressure difference between the top and bottom of the flue. The general rule for residential systems is that the chimney pipe must be at least 3 feet above the roof and 2 feet taller than anything within 10 feet.
Temperature difference: A greater temperature difference between the inside and outside air results in a stronger draft. For example, a cold chimney can cause a reverse draft or "backdraft" when you first start a fire.
Obstructions: Blockages like soot, creosote, or debris can restrict airflow and weaken the draft.
Negative air pressure: Air-tight modern homes can create a negative pressure environment that works against the chimney's natural draft. Installing a combustion air kit or opening a window slightly can help.
Pipe configuration: Excessive bends or horizontal runs in a chimney pipe can decrease the draft, as each turn adds friction and slows the airflow.
Solving updraft issues
If a chimney isn't drafting properly, it can fill a room with smoke, which is a serious health and safety hazard. Solutions include:
Pre-heating the flue: To fix a cold backdraft, you can warm the flue with a rolled-up, lit newspaper or a heat gun for a few minutes before starting the fire. This creates a small, initial updraft to get the system working correctly.
Proper sealing: Seal any gaps or cracks around the fireplace or chimney to prevent air leaks.
Damper installation: Consider installing an air damper to better regulate airflow.
Wind considerations: A chimney cap with a special design, such as a Vacu-Stack, can prevent wind from blowing back down the chimney

AI Overview     
For the flow of air exiting a pipe, the updraft velocity is a function of the thermal energy input (heat) and is described by the principles of the stack effect. In this phenomenon, heated air is less dense and creates a pressure difference that drives the flow.

The updraft equation links the thermal energy, which is characterized by the temperature difference, to the resulting mass flow rate. Stack effect equation for flow rate The stack effect equation is a practical model for calculating the flow rate Q generated by a temperature differential. Q=C_{d}A\sqrt{2gH\frac{T_{i}-T_{o}}{T_{i}}} 

where: 
Q = flow rate typically in cubic feet per minute or m^{3}/s
C_{d} = discharge coefficient (for a smooth pipe opening, usually 0.65 to 0.70
A = cross-sectional area of the pipe m^{2}
g = gravitational acceleration 9.81\,m/s^{2}H = effective height of the pipe mT_{i} = average indoor or internal temperature (Kelvin)T_{o} = outdoor or external temperature (Kelvin) 
This equation can be simplified for an enclosed pipe with a known height and a large opening.
It shows that flow rate is directly proportional to the square root of the temperature difference, T_{i}-T_{o}. 
Relating thermal energy input to temperature change 
The thermal energy input is related to the change in the air's internal temperature by the fundamental heat transfer equation: q=\.{m}c_{p}\Delta T where: q = rate of heat input W or J/s\.{m} = mass flow rate of air kg/sc_{p} = specific heat capacity of air at constant pressure 1005\,J/(kg\cdot K)\Delta T = change in temperature of the air as it passes through the pipe K Calculating updraft velocity To determine the velocity v of the exiting air, you can use the mass flow rate \.{m} and the air's final density \rho _{exit}: v=\frac{\.{m}}{\rho _{exit}A} where: \.{m} = mass flow rate kg/s\rho _{exit} = density of the air exiting the pipe kg/m^{3}A = cross-sectional area of the pipe m^{2} 
By linking these equations, you can model how a specific thermal energy input q translates into a temperature change, which then drives the air flow Q and determines the exit velocity v.
The updraft is a self-sustaining process driven by the buoyancy created from the thermal energy input

AI Overview
SpaceX's Starship can carry a maximum of 100 metric tons of payload to the Moon, but this requires refueling the spacecraft in Earth's orbit. Without orbital refueling, Starship's cargo capacity for a lunar mission is significantly reduced.

Orbital refueling for lunar missions
Because Starship is designed for full reusability, it expends most of its propellant getting into Earth orbit. To have enough fuel to travel to the Moon, land, and return, it must be refueled by multiple "tanker" Starships in low-Earth orbit (LEO).

Mission architecture: This architecture involves launching a Starship lunar mission vehicle into LEO, followed by several tanker Starship launches to transfer propellant.

Payload capacity: With in-orbit refueling, the Starship Human Landing System (HLS) variant is designed to land up to 100 tons of payload on the lunar surface.

Number of refuels: The exact number of tanker flights required is still under development, with estimates ranging from 4 to over a dozen.

Payload for NASA's Artemis missions

For NASA's Artemis program, Starship will serve as the Human Landing System (HLS), which will ferry astronauts from lunar orbit to the surface. The HLS variant of Starship is specifically designed with modifications for lunar landing and operation.
Crew and cargo: The HLS includes features like an elevator to deploy crew and cargo to the lunar surface.

Recent progress: As of late August 2025, a Starship test flight successfully deployed a test payload into Earth orbit, a crucial step towards demonstrating its payload capabilities. However, the much larger challenge of orbital refueling has yet to be demonstrated

AI Overview
An on-orbit payload half-fueled for a lunar mission is a theoretical scenario that does not align with SpaceX's current plan for Starship. For crewed lunar missions, the Starship Human Landing System (HLS) variant is designed to be fully fueled in low Earth orbit (LEO) by multiple tanker flights before departing for the Moon.

The main reason for this full refueling is the physics of orbital mechanics:

Massive fuel requirement: A Starship carrying a significant payload requires nearly its full fuel load to achieve a lunar trajectory and land on the surface. It must rendezvous with multiple tanker Starships in LEO to receive enough liquid oxygen and methane to top off its tanks.

Delta-V demand: The change in velocity (delta-V) required to leave LEO, travel to the Moon, and descend to the surface is very high. A fully fueled Starship with a payload is designed to use almost all of its propellant for this portion of the mission.

Lunar landing: Unlike returning to Earth where atmospheric drag can assist with deceleration, the Moon's lack of atmosphere means the Starship must perform a propulsive, or rocket-powered, landing. This requires a substantial amount of fuel.
The Artemis III mission profile

As an example, consider NASA's Artemis III mission, which will use a Starship HLS to land astronauts on the lunar surface. The planned mission profile highlights why a half-fueled payload is not feasible:
A Starship HLS launches with its payload into LEO.

The HLS is met by 10 to 20 tanker Starships to transfer propellant.
Once fully fueled, the Starship HLS departs Earth orbit for the Moon.
After landing, the HLS uses its engines to lift off from the lunar surface and return to lunar orbit, where it is not required to return to Earth as part of the initial contract.

While early estimates from SpaceX indicated that only half-refueling might be necessary for the lunar HLS mission due to lower gravity, the most recent information and assessments suggest a much higher number of refueling flights are needed to fill the tanks completely. This is also due to the possibility of "boil-off," the evaporation of cryogenic propellants in orbit, which reduces the amount of usable fue

AI Overview
While specific fuel amounts are subject to change during development, SpaceX's Starship Human Landing System (HLS) requires a full propellant load of roughly 1,200 tons to return from the lunar surface to lunar orbit. This is followed by a journey back to Earth and is made possible by extensive refueling in Earth orbit.

The departure profile for an Artemis mission
The Starship HLS lunar departure is part of a larger, complex mission architecture designed in cooperation with NASA for the Artemis program.

Astronaut transfer: After exploring the lunar surface, astronauts board the Starship HLS from the Moon's surface.
Lift-off from the Moon: Using its powerful Raptor engines, the Starship HLS launches vertically from the lunar surface. It will use a combination of vacuum-optimized Raptor engines for primary ascent and side-mounted cold-gas or RCS thrusters for final adjustments and to mitigate lunar dust kick-up near the surface.

Rendezvous in lunar orbit: The Starship HLS will then rendezvous and dock with a waiting Orion spacecraft in a Near-Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO).
Transfer and return: The crew will transfer from Starship back into the Orion capsule, which will then transport them back to Earth.

Why Starship needs to refuel for the moon mission
Unlike the Apollo lunar module, which was much smaller and had a two-stage design with a disposable ascent stage, Starship is a fully reusable, single-stage-to-orbit-from-the-moon system. It requires a significant amount of fuel for every stage of its journey:
Leaving Earth orbit (Trans-Lunar Injection): The ship needs fuel to depart low Earth orbit (LEO) and head toward the Moon.

Landing on the Moon: Maneuvering into lunar orbit and performing a soft landing requires a substantial amount of propellant.
Leaving the Moon: Taking off from the lunar surface to rendezvous with the Orion capsule in NRHO requires a very large amount of fuel.

The role of orbital refueling
Due to Starship's mass and the fuel needed for the round trip, it is impossible for a single launch to carry all the necessary propellant.

Tanker flights: Multiple Starship tanker vehicles will launch from Earth and refuel a Starship propellant depot in Earth orbit.
Depot rendezvous: The Starship HLS for the lunar mission will launch, dock with the depot, and take on its full load of fuel before departing for the Moon. SpaceX's orbital refueling system is currently still under developmen

AI Overview

The Falcon Heavy has a maximum payload of 63,800 kg (140,700 lbs) to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) when fully expendable and about 26,700 kg (58,860 lbs) to Geostationary Transfer Orbit (GTO). With boosters recovered, the LEO payload is around 57,000 kg, decreasing further if the core stage is also recovered. The payload capacity depends on the mission profile and whether the boosters are recovered for reuse.
Payload Capacities by Orbit and Mode

Fully Expendable:
LEO: 63,800 kg (140,700 lbs)
GTO: 26,700 kg (58,860 lbs)

Mars: 16,800 kg (37,040 lbs)
With Boosters Recovered:
LEO: ~57,000 kg (126,000 lbs)

Key Factors Influencing Payload Mass

Expendability:
The highest payload mass is achieved in a fully expendable configuration, where booster recovery is not prioritized, and therefore all available fuel is used for lift.
Booster Recovery:

Recovering the two side boosters and the center core reduces the rocket's maximum lift capability to space because less fuel is available for the mission, according to Wikipedia.
Mission Profile:

The intended orbit and trajectory for the payload significantly impact the required launch energy and, consequently, the maximum attainable payload mass, notes Space Exploration Stack Exchange.

AI Overview
For version 2 of Starship, SpaceX promised a payload mass of 100–150 metric tons to low-Earth orbit (LEO) in a fully reusable configuration. This represents a significant increase over the payload capacity of its predecessor, Block 1.

Payload mass by version
While SpaceX continues to rapidly iterate, the progression of Starship payload capabilities can be tracked by its different "Blocks".

Block 1: An early version used for orbital test flights, with a reusable payload mass of about 15 tons.

Block 2 (Current): Features a stretched propellant tank, reduced dry mass, and a more robust heat shield design. This allows it to meet the promised reusable payload capacity of 100 to 150 metric tons.

Block 3 (Future): This next-generation version is expected to further increase payload to 200 metric tons in a reusable configuration and up to 400 metric tons in an expendable mode. It will be taller and will use more powerful Raptor 3 engines.
Factors influencing version 2 payload

The higher performance of Starship version 2 compared to version 1 is achieved through several key upgrades:
Stretched tanks: Increases propellant capacity to boost performance.
Reduced dry mass: Optimizes the vehicle's structural design to carry more payload relative to its own weight.

Advanced heat shield: Enhances thermal protection during re-entry to improve reusability.
Upgraded avionics: Supports more complex missions and capabilities, such as on-orbit refueling.

Primary payloads for version 2

A primary driver for the increased payload capacity is the deployment of next-generation Starlink satellites, known as "V3" satellites.
Each V3 satellite is much larger and heavier than previous versions.

A single Starship launch is expected to deploy a massive number of V3 satellites, potentially adding 20 times the network capacity of a Falcon 9 launch.

In addition to Starlink, the version 2 Starship will also be used for other critical missions, including the Human Landing System (HLS) for NASA's Artemis program