You are not logged in.
I really didn't consider the possibility of finding higher lifeforms to be likely.
An intelligent being living in a sea of metallic hydrogen would be trapped.
There are a lot of layers with different chemistries where life might develop.
All faced with a difficult escape to space.
Given that the atmosphere is mainly Hydrogen,
a probe would easily sink to denser layers
and could come back up using a hot gas balloon
Aliens from Jupiter have not taken over the Solar System.
But they may be plotting.
The properties of space determine everything.
These properties are complex and consistent, but which theory works best ?
http://www.ldolphin.org/everything.html
Instead of counting sheep to go to sleep,
try length contraction divided by time dilation to avoid the singularity.
Does a similar transmission rule apply to black holes also?
If something can't transmit or react to waves is it non existent?
Void is a discontinuity, end of space.
Waves reflect, as in an open transmission line.
Waves are all we have to determine existence.
And reflection of a wave means boundary.
(Stealth aircraft is not a void because it absorbs radiation)
How can a black hole transmit waves in a state where any waves are absorbed by gravity, even light can't escape a black hole and it is suppose to be the fastest wave possible in the universe.?
Is gravity some special beast that we need to rewrite general relativity for, as gravity waves do escape a black hole, or do they?
Inside of a large black hole is where we may be living.
Gravity may be a property of space, not a particle which absorbs.
If gravity is just a distortion then a black hole isn't really transmitting anything , a void should transmit just a gravity distortion without really transmitting anything.
What properties does a time/space distortion have that couldn't be transmitted through a void or black hole?
There are processes within a black hole. What is the transfer function of a black hole ? Things fall in and out comes information on mass, charge, angular momentum, and latest from Hawking, the information that went in emerges eventually.
Something strange is happening with gravity and black holes without question, just no one has questioned why gravity is doing what it does at black holes.
Black holes are not singularities since they have angular momentum,
Still connected to the universe, because spinning without reference is meaningless.
Radiation via particle pair creation and tunneling faster than the speed of light.
Energy from angular momentum transferred to surrounding gas.
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object … ctid=28779
==============================
There are numerous black hole possibilities.
Collapsed neutron stars where the high pressure only allows elementary particles.
Large low density, such as the universe we live in.
What if we had a large black hole with squirrels in a squirrel cage.
The outer surface would be rotating, transferring to the outside.
Spherical shell (or long cylinder) black hole with gravity=0 at the center ?
Start from the fact that matter is composed of waves.
Waves are in a medium called space.
The void is not a void if it transmits or carries something.
An attempt to unify: http://home.comcast.net/~jeffocal/shadows.htm
The void can be meaningless and yet mean everything.
Just because it doesn't have properties doesn't mean it doesn't have effect.
The property of the void is the area it occupies, without a void taking up volume the universe couldn't expand.
Void is something that allows expansion ?
If you did not have the void, what would prevent expansion ?
Two universes or time/space bubbles running into each other is probably how universes start and collapse, but what is the medium they flow through to get to each other?
Space may be infinite. Black holes inside black holes etc.
Meaningless to talk of complete disconnect.
Each bubble onto itself, unobservable.
A black hole has no properties inside either but also has an effect on its region of space and maybe all of space.
Charge, mass, angular momentum, and remnant of particle pair of Hawking radiation. Just because, from our reference, time solutions inside the black hole are imaginary does not mean lack of structure or process inside.
Both void and black hole are interference and distortion, and both have an effect on time/space.
From the effects of the void, properties are deduced, therefore it cannot be a void !
Is our universe just 1 time bubble moving towards imminent collision with surrounding time bubbles in different states flowing through the voids created by the matrix of the multiverse.
We, in a black hole, connecting to another black hole, 2 galaxies merging, 2 solar systems, twin cities becoming one, one ameoba devouring the other ?
Those old science fiction shows might not be so wrong with parallel universes as the multiverse universes would go on forever.
Don't expect to go visit another universe though, since to get to another universe you must travel through void space with no time.
Imagination to form a logical theory.
But only real data can determine validity.
====================================
Michio Kaku and Art Bell have other ideas
http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guests/3.html
It's time to bend metal
Dreaming of Mars
But stuck in the Mud
There is no concensus
The void has no properties at all.
Just space without matter or energy or time.
A very bizarre place to think about that occupies volume but consists of nothing.
Then the void does not exist !
Only one hand clapping ?
Meaningless is an object without properties.
Space is all there is. Waves, gravity etc. are all properties of space.
Good reading: http://www.quantummatter.com/
Black holes just an interference pattern ?
But the void between universe membranes or black hole membranes if we exist in a black hole
What is the structure of the "void" that determines the extreme speed of Gravity, Single Photon Interference, allows particles to be created in pairs ?
The void between universes has no space and time and no matter yet occupies area
The latest interpretation from Hawking was that baby universes do not form as previously stated, but rejoin and release information, over time, in some way. Gravity has nailed the Black Hole down, and cannot run away with the information.
http://imprint.uwaterloo.ca/story.php?f … story=5398
Possible to rejoin the universe in other than thermal manner ?
Looks like it, if the information is only borrowed.
How to tell the Little Green Men in the Black Hole to make a convenient rocket motor for us. Reward or punishment ? Drop a neutron star on their heads or their favourite manna from heaven, platinum asteroids ?
All the old science fiction alternate reality universes were wrong ?
Soon to come, Alladin's Lamp, revised to the Rocket version.
If our Universe is a black hole and we try to solve for space and time outside.
http://answers.google.com/answers/threadview?id=700708
Use string theory ?
http://www.theory.caltech.edu/people/jh … ing11.html
Creating mini black holes with particle accelerators is the next step.
How does what you put in influence mini black hole properties ?
Will we get a periodic table for black holes ?
http://www.google.com/search?client=ope … 8&oe=utf-8
most precise automated milling machine (or 3d printer) will ocasionaly produce peices with errors or defects
If you could just turn off the CIA tracking code.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.inf … e10668.htm
http://www.parascope.com/articles/0197/xerox.htm
inner working of a black hole as nothing can escape a singularity
Singularity just means that the model is outside its useful range.
Extrapolate and other effects predominate.
The imaginary solutions, how can they be mapped or interpreted ?
If we are inside a black hole, our universe, local laws apply.
But how would we interpret events outside the event horizon ?
Things falling in, but not escaping.
Puzzling !
Maybe you just need to know the frequency to rub at, and what to rub with what.
Then the free lunch genie I'm sure will appear and we will all see the light.
As with most free lunches though they seldom are free or even happen at lunchtime.
Hawking changed from information destroyed (lost to us, captured in a baby universe), to information leaks back out in imaginary time. What goes in influences what comes out. How and what you feed a black hole controls later behaviour. Contrary to Wheeler's Black Hole has no hairs.
Begs the question; can you feed a black hole something to give severe indigestion and explode quickly, or live longer ? Eject in a specifird direction and become a rocket engine ?
The free lunch universe may be accessed via extra dimensions.
The genie in Aladdin's lamp moved ?
Just have to rub the hole correctly ?
Propulsion system which sucks into a black dustbag,
and blows a little away ?
http://www.vacdepot.com/vacuums/images/ … 363911.jpg
but I draw the line at singularities
Singularity means you need another theory.
Short lived black holes likely created by cosmic rays on a regular basis.
But their properties are unknown.
Will be interesting as particle accelerators start making black holes.
Lot of new theories and protesters fearing the end.
Once black holes are created in particle accelerators, we will know a lot more.
Then the question becomes how to extend their lives.
Essentially making a white hole less white.
Possibly another way of storing energy, maybe even easier than antimatter.
Cosmic rays may be producing miniature black holes which evaporate quickly.
Large black holes have large mass and are difficult to move.
But may be good to swing by for extra speed.
Will take time
http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/Papers/NASA_anti.pdf
http://www.google.com/search?client=ope … 8&oe=utf-8
Giant accelerators in space. Laser and microwave aimed at antiproton rich parts on the Sun to push antiprotons into safe collecting spots.
Hydrogen bombs specially tuned for proton emission. In space, gather the right mixture in a setup to capture antiprotons. Then ignite with concentrated sunlight, lasers, microwaves and hydrogen bombs.
Still needs to be answered if there are favourable antiproton concentration eventsts in the Solar System. Near natural magnetic mirrors, where velocity is lowest, seems like a good place to investigate. Cosmic antiprotons, sufficiently focused by the Sun's gravity, for convenient collection ?
http://www.copernicus.org/COSPAR/colloq … hc0023.pdf
"The result is as surprising as gold miners blasting a cliff face and discovering that the explosion threw all the dirt in one direction and all the gold in another direction,"
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/new … hessi.html
It is theorized that in the near future that particle accelerators will produce enough energy to create a miniature black hole but only for a very short period of time.
And there may be a way to control the resulting products of the black hole.
Storing antiprotons:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=& … tnG=Search
No, it really wouldn't be any cheaper then accelerators.
Not enough energy available on Earth for large quantities of antimatter, at any cost.
So have to look other places in the Solar System, Sun, maybe around Jupiter ?
It takes several seconds for charged particles to go back and forth in the Van Allen Belt.
If a craft moved along magnetic lines a good portion could be intercepted.
Mother ship used to predict the Sun and coordinate the collector craft.
The collector craft would need to focus the incoming anti protons as a TV tube does, electronically, Slowed down then stored. Force on opposite charge is opposite, so anti particles are deflected in opposite directions.
Earth's proton belt would be a good place to test capture and storage.
The avegage Solar Flare Produces 1 lb of Anti-matter, This includes
Positrons & Anti-Protons. How much Power is that?
And the charged antimatter would be concentrated by the magnetic field.
Making it easier to intercept. Even use it to power the collecting craft.
Closer to home, does the Van Allen Belt trap the antimatter from the solar wind ?
Half of antimatter energy lost to neutrinos, next best is,
Antimatter catalyzed nuclear pulse propulsion:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter … propulsion
just build the GCNR engine
from: http://www.lascruces.com/~mrpbar/GCNR%20Aero%20Amer.pdf
"The drawback of this design for a GCNR is not as obvious as the spherical system although the problem of the uranium moving to the nozzle is common to both. The major problem of the annular rocket is that it cannot scale up to the diameter necessary to have a critical mass of the uranium. As the radius increases, the thickness of the hydrogen layer gets thinner because the mass flow into the system is held constant. Thus, the cooling layer gets too thin and the walls of the engine will burn through."
Both lower density (to increase area of heat flow)
and lower critical mass could make a difference.
http://www.answers.com/topic/critical-mass-1
http://www.science.co.il/PTelements.asp?s=Density
Likely gas core reactor power plants will be developed to increase efficiency,
then adapted to rockets.
==================================
All the smoke detectors, disposed as garbage, going to waste.
Make gas cored rockets from them ?
http://www.globalterroralert.com/smokedetectorbomb.pdf
http://typhoon.tokai-sc.jaea.go.jp/icnc … .5_022.pdf
space station take time to construct. time is cost as much as dollars.
You would expect compound interest on your investment.
More than 5 years is long range planning.
So very few space projects are economically viable in the short term.
Immediate return is in reputation and public relations.
Anti matter production and storage difficulties are not for the near future.
But the link makes you wonder how long:
http://www.hbartech.com/niac_sail1_final.pdf
Lower cost and sooner to launch may be
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Americium
http://www.space4peace.org/mars/nrockets.htm
Recycle smoke detectors ?
escape: v = (2GM/r)^1/2
M = 4/3 * Pi * r^3 * density
Force gravity at surface = G * M/r^2
=======================
Assume Mars 3 times Dense as Earth (Dmars = 16.5 Dearth = 5.5)
for same surface escape velocity:
Dearth*Rearth^2 = Dmars*Rmars^2
Ratio of radius: sqrt(1/3) = 0.577 times Earth
Mass = (0.577)^3 * 3 = 0.577 of Earth
g = Density * r = 3 * 0.577 = 1.731 times Earth
for same gravity g at surface:
Dearth * Rearth = Dmars * Rmars
1/3 = 0.333 times Earth radius
Mass = (0.333)^3 * 3 = 0.111
surface escape = density * r^2 = 3 * (0.33)^2 = 0.33 times Earth
Atmosphere close to surface, so escape at the top of atmosphere only slightly lower. The scale height in your link assumes constant gravity, independent of radius. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scale_height
========================
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/200310 … _sys.shtml
Heavy elements may also have a tendency to increase in concentration in a supernova remnant, similar to the solar system, or the ore in a mine.
The lighter elements get blown faster, leaving the dense behind.
Shockwaves from 2 supernova or black hole activity might accenuate the process.
Velocity at same temperature is inversely proportional to square root of mass.
The big question is why is it so expensive to produce anti-matter?
Storage problem would be easier if solid antimatter could be produced.
Lithium, a metal, magnetically suspended ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium
Float a grain of anti - Lithium close to the pusher plate, then release hydrogen.
