You are not logged in.
The only problem is that Nasa has to few work sites near colleges or universities. In NH we has a few good colleges and the UNH campus in Durham. Which by the way has done some probes for Nasa in the past but aside from that there is little need for the engineering degrees unfortunately since few jobs would require such knowledge.
The main engineering skills are in construction of buildings, Road bridges, high tech electronic or defense related firms and most recently in the biotech field.
All the more reason to make a repair shop module, to store all the shuttle RCC panels and equipment for doing a real repair to either the shuttle or Iss. Throw in a few of the ceramic TPS tiles as well. Not to mention some sheet metal, drills and other needed tools to patch a hole.
They have air locks that can be sealed.
What if the section that is stuck is the one that has the space suits?
In addition I would say that they have neither minimal or no means of repair capability for such an occurrence should it ever happen.
More like the apollo approach from specification per section to design within criteria.
Besides gravity, the electromagnetic belts and an extra thick ozone layer that protects us from the lethal radiation of the sun. We can only think of changing the amount of green house gasses to warm up the planet and to make a breathable atmosphere that would be lost over time due to no or low magnetic field and lesser gravity.
Even if we ever do achieve a breathable atmosphere the lethal radiation would still be a problem? Or did I miss something in the green house gas infussion.
I hope we never get a hole in the station. If we can not fix one in the shuttle. How can we hope or expect Nasa to do anything but not be able to do it elsewhere.
Thanks clark for the earlier link posts.
I see from review of it that most of the info is somewhat dated from the 80's with cost projects toward the future.
I noticed that mars Heavy lift capability was at least reviewed but where do we stand today with that rockets developement?
As noted by the most recent Hubble component failure Hubble Program is Reshuffling Observation Requests Following Failure of primary spectrograph. This is to be expected but if the time line for the planned rescue is not moved up to compensate for failures soon. There may be nothing left to save.
On smelting operations here is a solar furnace.
High Temperature Solar Ovens
http://www.permanent.com/i-ovens.htm
Lunar Materials Utilization
http://www.permanent.com/l-index.htm
So far I believe the only vegitable growth experiment has been done with a variety of snow peas on the ISS. Does anyone know of any others that have been tried?
Food for thought Alternative power sources being developed.
A New Charge Powering Up New Uses for Supercapacitors.
http://abcnews.go.com/section....-1.html
Snipet:
Like batteries, these devices could hold enough energy to power portable devices, computers, or even cars. And they could be recharged within seconds, not hours like traditional rechargeable batteries.
The heart of Honeywell's solution is a fluorborate salt, a chemical whose physical structure allows it to store a tremendous number of electrons.
Recently we have heard of plans by many nations after the announcement of the Presidential vision. From this Nation and others of already in the works probes, explorers and of manned flight as well not only into orbit for the first time but more aggressive plans to land man again on the Moon. There have also been the statement to go beyond an to explore Mars someday.
It was not to long ago that many would have thought that a manned flight from China was impossible. Or that developing nations of india would even have a space program.
Gone are the days when the big two some of the Russian space agency and Nasa being the only games in town.
Space is not easy and not only is it filled with risk but it directly influenced by politics and of policies when it comes to funding.
Bowing to the later is India which is to Rethink Plans to Send Man to Moon. Indian Space Research Organization Reconsiders Its Plan to Send Man to Moon by 2015.
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/World/ap20040812_927.html
On the note of China Calls For Cooperation With US, Japan In Space Program. This is a very good thing in that it will defuse the military tension of a new space race.
Snipet:
"A top Chinese space official said China is willing to cooperate with the United States and Japan in space programs on exploration and finding resources.
During a briefing on China's geospace exploration program in cooperation with Europe, Sun Laiyan, director of the China National Space Administration, said China hopes to cooperate with nations who have space exploration programs."
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-04zx.html
As you all are aware of it is time to change How Nasa does space and at what cost. We are all involved in such conversations daily here on these forums and on many others. Talking to space friends near and far on how to achieve the goal of not only going to the Moon but as well to Mars.
Lets all keep it up, we are being heard.
I would say from the resources at Boeing that they are possibly ahead of the game but still way to slow for my likings.
Baa proposal
http://www.boeing.com/defense....nal.pdf
CES - CEV Launch Vehicle
http://boeingmedia.com/images/one.cfm?i … &release=t
Building Blocks of Tomorrow
http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/spa … locks.html
Achieving the National Exploration Vision
Propulsion Perspective
http://www.boeing.com/defense....ood.pdf
So here are a few links for where Lockheeds thinks we are for the CEV.
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/3582.pdf
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/5565.pdf
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/3581.pdf
I would say not much happening here either
So without a manned space rocket or use of the shuttle and no other purchaseable rocket from other nations that we could use if we could pay for it. We are left to only two options of let it crash or to put up the cash.
Yes you are correct in that it is not finished but the officail version of completeness is 75% as indicated on the web site.
http://www.kistleraerospace.com/
As to how much they are in the hole some creative fund drives and financing would take care of some of the problem. Especially if clients could be brought online for purchase of there vehicles. Whether it will happen is up to them if they have the drive and determination to accomplish the task.
Some good news may be coming out of the destruction of the rubicon.
Forks: National publicity brings acclaim -- and possibly investors' bucks -- to rocketeers building a new Rubicon
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/sited … tml/170414
"The result: A slew of investors have e-mailed the cash-strapped company, saying they are interested in making an investment in the partners' dream of developing space tourism."
NASA works on far-out propulsion plans
Aerocapture, tethers and atomic power under study
NASA works on far-out propulsion plans
Aerocapture, tethers and atomic power under study,
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5673239/
"The Momentum-Exchange/Electrodynamic-Reboost Tether System, shown in this artist's conception, could pick payloads up from a reusable launch vehicle in low Earth orbit and toss them to geosynchronous orbit."
Granted this system is not from the surface but any reduction in cost from using free energy sources is a plus.
I got a feeling that Nasa experts will probably be required to do inspections of any rockets designs by others for safety reason reviews or of some other organizational watch dog group.
On the note of China Calls For Cooperation With US, Japan In Space Program. This is a very good thing in that it will defuse the military tension of a new space race.
Snipet:
"A top Chinese space official said China is willing to cooperate with the United States and Japan in space programs on exploration and finding resources.
During a briefing on China's geospace exploration program in cooperation with Europe, Sun Laiyan, director of the China National Space Administration, said China hopes to cooperate with nations who have space exploration programs."
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/china-04zx.html
Sorry gang I forgot the news source link in the other post.
More news on the Kistler which has announce additions to senior management team for Kistler's K-1 Reusable Launch Vehicle.
I think if they really want there rocket to be a viable option for going to the ISS, IMO they should design a manned docking capable capsule to go with the remainder of the work that they have done.
If the time of unit is right they could come out smelling like a rose as an in between step to the CEV that Nasa really needs now.
Some good news may be coming out of the destruction of the rubicon.
Forks: National publicity brings acclaim -- and possibly investors' bucks -- to rocketeers building a new Rubicon
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/sited … tml/170414
"The result: A slew of investors have e-mailed the cash-strapped company, saying they are interested in making an investment in the partners' dream of developing space tourism."
Some good news may be coming out of the destruction of the rubicon.
Forks: National publicity brings acclaim -- and possibly investors' bucks -- to rocketeers building a new Rubicon
http://www.peninsuladailynews.com/sited … tml/170414
"The result: A slew of investors have e-mailed the cash-strapped company, saying they are interested in making an investment in the partners' dream of developing space tourism."