New Mars Forums
You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Announcement
#1 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Quantum entaglement as propulsion - Interstellar spaceflight possible? » 2004-08-14 06:09:40
I think they are just terms for two possible states described by the system math. If so, the math would provide the reference frame.
The math I believe comes from shape.
In the 3 in 1 shape pictured earlier, the 3#3#3 frame cube is composed of two shapes.
Each of these shapes has a framework of 8 tetrahedrons. The 8 tetrahedrons are linked at the corners and when they are spun, each shape appears to turn into both shapes.
One shape is the frame of a centred cubeoctohedron the other is a stellated octohedron. When each shape is spun is gives the appearance of 16 interlocking tetrahedrons, one enmeshed with the other.
This must be an example of quantum entanglement on the smallest level.
#2 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Quantum entaglement as propulsion - Interstellar spaceflight possible? » 2004-08-13 03:54:41
I think that the different spin states have the same amount of energy. As I said above, I currently don't think that the particles ever actually change from "up" to "down" at all, the just change from "undecided" to "up" or "down".
Is not "up" and "down" relative to the observer? An analog clock has a clockwise motion when viewed from the face. an anticlockwise motion when viewed from behind.
I understand that science is trying to identify which spin a hidden paricle has, so it's on it's way towards cracking the Heisenburg uncertainty principle, or the fictional Star Trek transporters. Once someone has identified the spin this can be commumicated and set.
Everything else is ambiguous
But history is relative and written by the victors, it depends on what one is told/read/experienced.
#3 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-08-12 15:44:24
I have now built the prototype 6 arms at 0 to 46 Squared. It does not work. Thanks for your time and votes.
It maybe futile, but I will now rescale and add more squares, as I have the materials. Time will tell.
Will contact this site on this subject again within 4 weeks.
#4 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Magick Squares - The Principle of Magic Squares » 2004-08-11 07:06:19
Am I right if I conclude your theories have something intrinsically subjective, that is, depending on the alphabet you use?
YES. If you can imagine each individual as a computer. The DOS system being a language. In the Genisis story where language was split up, did the order of them change as well? In Hebrew their ABC was ABG, Aleph, Beth, Gimel.
There is a psycological effect, in a string of sounds and letters one learns. The first three ABC, and each place will 'say' each letter slightly different. Think what images come into your mind thinking of a number, then a letter. Put them together and relate that on the Phyche.
Would some Swedish guy be able to get these insights in the cube and superstrings, despite his 28-charqacter alphabet? Or would he obtain some insight that is in some sense essential to it, where something turns out te be 28? And what about Russia (33)?
28 is a perfect number without a space. I stretch the English language to 27 because of the space between words.
But the language when spoken can be split on the smallest level. DEF the next three letters sounds like Death of Deaf does that mean the 4 begins with D... E... F....
#5 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Quantum entaglement as propulsion - Interstellar spaceflight possible? » 2004-08-11 05:35:08
Two questions:
1. What about the 2x2 cubes which are inside the 3x3? You state there is a total of 28 cubes, a perfect number. But 1 + 8 + 27 makes 36, a perfect number. What about that? Or is that mathematic relativity the real bottom of special and general relativity?
A http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~his … bers.html] perfect number in the classical sense of the word. The picture below of a view of the Quantum Cube, 1x1, 2x2 and 3x3. It makes a 'eight' cube structure. 2x2 has 1x1 in it. 3x3 has 1x1 and 2x2 in it.
The cube of 8 is the basis of Imperial measure, 8 divisions to an inch.
2. Our alphabeth counts 26 characters, but Greec counts 24, Russian 33 (or so), Swedish 28, Chines, Japanese I do not know but much more. What about that?
Thanks for the info.
About superstring: If i've right understood Hawking it's also possible that there are 10 string-dimensions. Hawking proposes extremely curved 6 dimensions that shut themselves to a futile space-time-like somewhat. The remaining 4 dimensions form our spacetime. What about that??
In the study of Magic Squares a table can be made of the line value of magic square. For example a 6 magic square with a start value of 1 shares the same constant 111 (sum of the diagonal) as the line value of a 3 magic square with a start value of 33.
1 2 3 4 5 6
8 11 12
15 16 18
21 22 24
26 29 30
31 36
33 34 35
37 38
39 41
The concept goes to infinity with strict rules of sharing. One of these sharing rules is that the 6 magic square does not 'tango' (or is it entangle.) with a 4 Magic Square.
The 4th Quantum Cube is an expanded 3 shape, with a cube frame in the middle. I see as a hollographic cube, with which an individuals reality is made.
Ant
#6 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Magick Squares - The Principle of Magic Squares » 2004-08-10 14:59:06
I found http://www.earthportals.com/Portal_Mess … lles.html] Jose Arguelles' book Earth Ascending an interesting read, he bases the Mayan calender on an 8 Magic Square.
The best time application I have found so far.
#7 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Magick Squares - The Principle of Magic Squares » 2004-08-10 13:04:39
1. Why not counting 36 cubes instead of 28? The 2x2x2 cubes inside the 3x3x3 cube are also cubes, I think?
Already have, 36 cubes can be found surrounding the Magick Square of 10. It's origin, the sum of eight. The 2x2x2 cube has a 3x3x3 framework.
2. What about alphabeths with a different amount of characters? (Swedish, Russian, Greec, Chinese, Japanese, Arabian,....)
We all have our LOS (language operating system). Mine is English, East London. All my 'warp drive twists' are dependant on it's culture. My interest in alphabets is to do with their order.
After I have completed the wheel I am concidering placing my alphabetic N into space. That is to reorder my internal alphabet to change the 14th letter to space to see the effect. This will displace the rest of my alphabet so that N to Z would be the 15th to 27th letter of the alphabet, the 14th being space. Huh, I could add another space at the end and be spoilt for choice which space I choose between words.
14 is the math of a double tetrahedron which to me represents life. The contemplation is to link life and space together into my psyche.
Concider for a minute Arnie in the films Terminator... He says.. "I'll be BAC", improbable as it sounds his ABC was BAC. After all how can one track the time lines without some kind of trace like an altered alphabet. What would happen if children at school was taught ACB instead of ABC.
Their third letter would be B. Will their C 3 be freed to B 3?
#8 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Magick Squares - The Principle of Magic Squares » 2004-08-10 10:41:10
Now, for the 3 x 3 x 3 hypercube. Let's see, I make my first 3 x 3 cube. Now where do I put my next cube? It can't be adjacent to any cube in the first set because that would violate the 3 x 3 requirement. So I guess the hypercube cannot be made in three dimensional space.
Just like a particle is a wave a sphere is also a cube. It's square face cannot be locked into another, but its incomplete corners can.
Is it really true that in the 27 unit hypercube that only one unit cube cannot be seen from the outside? I can remotely see that it might be true because in the 4th dimension you will be able to see a lot of faces but I'm afraid that with that you have come to the extreme limit of my powers of visualization.
The cube of 27 has corners imagine them points. If you were to count the points it would be the same as a 4x4x4=64 a cube of the forth dimension.
As an aside what makes the number 28 a "perfect" number?
28 is a perfect number in Math because its the sum of its divisors 1+2+4+7+14=28.
are these 10 cubes unit cubes? In other words, can I actually make this tetrahedron in our 3-dimensional world?
The cubes are unit cubes 1x1x1, yes. All you need is 10 dice to see the shape.
Practical appications are neat. I will be fascinated when it is complete. I guess I need to do a search and find out what a "gravity wheel" is in case people mean something by it more than a spinning Von Braun doughnut.
Try this link on http://www.besslerwheel.com]Bessler The wheel I have, looks by far the most promising model yet, but it is now very expensive to extend, I may have to rescale the whole thing.
#9 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Magick Squares - The Principle of Magic Squares » 2004-08-10 10:14:44
Your explanation is a bit confusing. If I understand correctly, your number system has a different "times" operation (I'll call it ~). It appears that
1~1=1
2~2=4
and n~n = n*n+(n-2)~(n-2) for n>2Is this correct? How does your times operation work when you are not "squaring" a number?
Sorry I didn't explain very well.
In the normal times table numbers are arranged in rows and columns.
As you can see the last column contains the 3 times table up to 10x.
1 2 3
4 5 6
7 8 9
10 11 12
13 14 15
16 17 18
19 20 21
22 23 24
25 26 27
28 29 30
Magic Squares
Magic squares represent the first equal block. In the 3 magic square the numbers are from 1 to 9. These are rearranged to equal 15 in eight directions.
8 1 6
3 5 7
4 9 2
Currently the Magic Square can start at any number and sometimes the line value matches the line value of other squares. This is known as sharing and then it gets deeper into sharing time and space frames.
Magick Squares
Magick Squares do not normally have a start value of 1 as the framework of two tetrahedrons are needed to make a cube. The minimum 'normal number' start value is 2. This does make it very confusing when trying to explain so I will ignore this fact for the moment.
Magick Squares follow the same math pattern rules as Magic Squares. One way this Magick Square can be written on flat space, is
1 1 1
1 2 1
1 1 1
Ignoring the above rule the hidden cube in the middle is the first cube and is for this purpose numbered 1. The first (Alpha) to be seen is numbered 2 and the last (Omega) 10. This gives a constant line vaue of 18.
2 3 4
5 6 7
8 9 10
The Magick Square of 3
Alpha 2 : Omega 10
3 rows by 3 columns = 10
1 1 1 2 3 4
1 2 1 5 6 7
1 1 1 8 9 10
The Magick Square of 4
Alpha 5 : Omega 20
4 rows by 4 columns = 20
1 1 1 1 5 6 7 8
1 2 2 1 9 10 11 12
1 2 2 1 13 14 15 16
1 1 1 1 17 18 19 20
The Magick Square of 5
Alpha 11 : Omega 35
5 rows by 5 columns = 35
1 1 1 1 1 11 12 13 14 15
1 2 2 2 1 16 17 18 19 20
1 2 3 2 1 21 22 23 24 25
1 2 2 2 1 26 27 28 29 30
1 1 1 1 1 31 32 33 34 35
This shape link between cubetetracolumns and Magick Squares is an important one.
I hope you get the idea now.
#10 Re: Interplanetary transportation » New number system. » 2004-08-10 01:30:59
I can't see everyone using a Gravity Wheel as a means of energy, just like I dont see any LED watches anymore.
The biggest flaw with the gravity wheel is that it has no 'money go round' application, it introduces a concept of something for nothing.
As the gravity wheel is the first application of Magick Squares, these two concepts come to mind.
The classic film, The Forbidden Planet, worst case scenario. The promised new world as mentioned in the Bible best case. (from Revelation 21).
Ant
#11 Re: Interplanetary transportation » New number system. » 2004-08-09 18:02:53
I do have a 6 Magick Square displayed athttp://www.stargrail.co.uk/4656/7803.html] stargrail.co.uk
The New Number System is based on the Magic Square Principles. Magic Squares are equal squares, normally with a consequetive number in each square.
The new exposure here is Magick Squares, they are equal cubes arranged in equal square grids as flat as possible with a consequetive number above 1.
The number of cubes in a Magick Square can be the same as a Cubetetracolumn this is a very important link.
I believe understanding this principle is the key, to enable Gods kingdom to come on Earth as it is in Heaven, free energy, Gravity.
Ant
#12 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Magick Squares - The Principle of Magic Squares » 2004-08-09 16:31:26
I have been asked by Morris in interplanetary transportation to start a new thread with my answer, so here it is.
The math I study is a three dimensional math. It can be represented on paper, but the medium is difficult and there are so many different ways of seeing.
Magic Squares are equal squares with number. Magick Squares are Cubes in an equal square grid with consequetive numbers above 1.
Alphabet, Number and Shape.
Imagine a Cube made of 27 equal cubes. This is a 3x3x3 Cube. 26 are visable on the ouside, the one in the middle is there or is it?, it cannot be seen, this is the http://www.superstringtheory.com/blackh/blackh4.html]26 dimentions plus boson of superstring theory. It just so happens to be the number of letters in the English Alphabet. Thats 26 letters plus the space inbetween words.
Making a shape out of 10 cubes, (4 sided tetrahedron 1+2+3+4) one can get a 3 cubetetracolumn (3 layers: 1,3,6) and a 3 square, two in the middle and eight surrounding. There is a completely buried cube in two halves in the 3 square, which we use as number 0 in our numbering system. It's abstractly galaxy shape. Are they sure the universe is doughnut shape, could it rather be a 10 squared shape?
Our alphabet and numbering system is applied superstring theory. I do believe there is another space, within a 3x3x3 cube, a total of 28 cubes, a perfect number.
A framework of 10 tetrahedons have 36 lines. The configuration of a double stellated tetrahedron.
In a single stellated tetrahedron the centre is hidden and only 4 can be seen on the surface, but in fact there are 5.
I understand one way of looking at the math behind the stellated tetrahedron in the magick squares 'sharing space frames' and 'time frames' is self awareness.
The numbering system produces a different type of times table:
3x3=10
4x4=20
5x5=35
6x6=56
A variation of the gravity wheel I am building is the first application of the 3x3=10.
#13 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Quantum entaglement as propulsion - Interstellar spaceflight possible? » 2004-08-09 15:18:51
Well, I'm having a hard time with the concept of "what surrounds nothing" on the smallest scale. Are you talking about things like dark matter?
Unless you're planning to publish on it or something, what kinds of mental structures do alphabets, number, time, and shape have in common? If you answer, would you consider a new thread?
Give you a bit about number and alphabet.
The math I study is a three dimentional math. It can be represented on paper, but the medium is difficult and there are so many different ways of seeing.
Imagine a Cube made of 27 equal cubes. This is a 3x3x3 Cube. 26 are visable on the ouside, the one in the middle is there or is it?, it cannot be seen, this is the http://www.superstringtheory.com/blackh/blackh4.html]26 dimentions plus boson of superstring theory. It just so happens to be the number of letters in the English Alphabet. Thats 26 letters plus the space in between words.
However if you make a shape out of 10 cubes (1+2+3+4) one can get a 3 cubetetracolumn and 3x3 grid with two in the middle and 8 surrounding. There is a completely buried cube in two halves, which we use as number 0 in our numbering system. It's abstractly galaxy shape, are they sure the universe is doughnut shape, could it rather be a 10 squared shape?
Our alphabet and numbering system is applied superstring theory. I do believe there is another space, within a 3x3x3 cube, a total of 28 cubes a perfect number.
The numbering system produces a different times table:
3x3=10
4x4=20
5x5=35
6x6=56
A variation of the gravity wheel I am building is the first apllication of the 3x3=10.
Ant
#14 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Quantum entaglement as propulsion - Interstellar spaceflight possible? » 2004-08-09 01:12:49
...circadian rhythms and I suspect that there would be some important issues on how these react to microgravity, ambient light, activity levels, etc. as we get away from Earth. Some of this MUST have already been investigated.
http://www.ortho.lsumc.edu/Faculty/Mari … html]Frank Brown as a founding investigator regarding Circadian rhythms. And http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/v … 05-2.html] Joe Miller for a martian 'radioactivity footprint'.
BTW I'm 43 but I suppose one could say I am a student with a hobby studying the organisation of alphabets, number, time and shape. I retired from a 20 year career with Londons Tube Network, London Underground due to illness. I have a hobby trying to find what surrounds nothing on the smallest scale and its primary applications.
Ant
#15 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Quantum entaglement as propulsion - Interstellar spaceflight possible? » 2004-08-08 15:46:43
The first is that we can't travel fast enough and the second is that we don't live long enough.
When we journey into space we will no longer be orbiting the Sun, time is marked by Earth rotations round the Sun.
If one was to leave the current orbit of the Sun and move towards another solar system, going away from the Sun directly, how does the body know to age?
It's annual clock is simply not there.
Ant
#16 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-08-01 18:10:41
Just letting you know, as most of you suspect, it is not as easy as E=6*45 Squared.
However from my observations of the wheel, I still believe that E=MC^2 has a minimum solution. I will continue to expand the square articulating matrix one at a time, as funds permit, until it works or until I loose my religion.
The next time I post this subject will be when the Wheel is working under its own power, oh... I will include the numbers of the minimum solution.
Ant
#17 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-28 16:25:44
I now have an axle. Tomorrow I will make a suitable axle support.
I will know within 2 days either way.
Ant
#18 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-21 01:40:39
Actually, Betsy Ross invented pi - specifically cherry pi - after George Washington cut down her cherry tree.
Pi is equal to one brownie or two scoops of ice cream in the Richard Simmons Deal-a-Meal plan.
No matter what they tell you in school, pi is not squared. Pi is round.
Symbolism in a Cherry must be an American 'thing'.
In England, where I lived before moving to Scotland, nursery school songs teaches 4 and 20 blackbirds come from a pi.
Ant
#19 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-20 11:51:31
The answer is ALWAYS exactly c.
Magic Squares give the illusion that each equal square has a line of numbers that add up the same, in any straight line up or down or corner to opposite corner. I have studied them as a hobby for 14 years and Love it. I want to continue to study them until I die.
Each magic square's line sum can be seen as a constant. A bit like the speed of light, but lower of course. Each Magic Square's line sum has a constant. The constant line value of a 6 Magic Square is 111.
The machine I am constructing will answer my speculated questions, I was hoping others would be interested.
By the vote at least some relate to what I am saying. I have time available tomorrow to go to the scrapies to get a more suitable axle. Once a suitable replacement is obtained, work will resume to complete it.
Ant
#20 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-20 06:41:44
With respect, it does not matter whether you agree or not, Lindemann is right and you are wrong. Learn to live with it.
I do, along with the rest of the human race.
c is an algebraic number in the sense that it has an exact value. It is a CONSTANT, which is BY DEFINITION 299,792,458 meters/sec. That is the ONLY value it CAN EVER have. Period.
I agree C^2 is a constant when you refer the equation to light in a vacuum. Natural light comes from the biggest mass in the solar system the Sun.
Pi is a transendental number in the sense that it does not have an exact solution. Thus Pi, which begins with 3.141… has been solved to 10 billion places but still without any end in sight. But Pi too is a CONSTANT. It has one value and one value only, but because we cannot determine it exactly it is called a transendental number, and that's why we cannot square a circle. (Or, if you insist, cube a sphere.)
What happened to PI the fraction? The result that is obtained from using pi as a decimal does give a transendental number in base 10.
Ant
#21 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-20 03:18:08
If that would be a transendental number (I think you are right, it would) then clearly it cannot be determined exactly.
The ratified number would be as acurate as Pi, but I have no interest in solving that task. I'm too busy already.
Therefore you can't square a circle, just as I said Lindemann had proved way back in 1882.
I don't agree.
c (as defined--and this was previously discussed here) is clearly not a transendental number.
Then C must be an algabraic number, having a minimum and maximum or a sliding solution, depending on the value of the variable M as both are linked to E.
Therefore I reason that a minimum solution to Energy must be possible.
As I have been building the matrix up, I and others have been observing it's movement and development. I have arrived at the stage where the articulating square matrix appears just enough to make the wheel turn continuously.
I just need to sort out this axle.
Ant
#22 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-19 16:02:04
What is the number prior to infinity?
The dot in the centre of the circle, before it moves and goes round and round forever, making a circle (PI) then a sphere, expanding and then contracting.
I suppose when forever ends the point goes back to its origin or starts again from a different point.
Ant
#23 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-19 15:49:25
Pi is just a transcendental number.
A transcendental number is a real number that is not the root of an algebraic equation with rational coefficients.
The ratio that would ratify a solution to squaring a circle would also be a transendental number, obtained from the radius and square length ratio.
Are you implying that C^2 can only been seen as the transendental number of the speed of light as measured in a vacuum?
I can only see the 2 of E=MC^2 as a transendental number the rest an algebraic formula.
Ant
#24 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-19 12:55:28
Pi is the ratio between a radius and circumference.
Uh, a piece of string is simply the poor mans pair of compasses, but much less acurate
If one was to turn a circle into a square using infinitely different lengths of string. Each string joined together at their ends. A ratio between the radius of the circle made and length of square made would emerge. This ratio would have mystical properties just like pi, and would solve the emigma, if there is one.
Ant
#25 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Gravity Wheel - Is E=6*45^2, minimum solution? » 2004-07-19 04:16:21
What has http://mathforum.org/isaac/problems/pi3.html] Lindemann got to do with using squares to make a wheel rotate?
Pity he did'nt have a piece of string!!!
Ant