You are not logged in.
Thank you, guys for the response.
I mean: Venus as is now with orbital or insolation modification. Does not matter so much.
From Nordley's material it seems it will have >300K surface temperature even at the orbit of Saturn?
How much AU further from the Sun Venus have to be positioned in order to have 300-ish K surface temperature?
https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/10/f … -cave.html
100 m wide x 50 000 m long x ~50m ceiling high ( ~20 floors )
5 000 000 m2 = 5 km2
~ 30 000 population?
Monaco.
SpaceNut,
don't understand what you mean?
VENUS - easy.:
Excite as many of these as necessary towards Venus.:
http://www.sciencealert.com/run-for-cov … ards-earth
utilize both the kinetic energy of the plasma (by MHD down to cryonic cold) and its hydrogen to convert the H + CO2 into water and graphite.
Tom,
Please, show the masses, thickness etc. of the proposed by you rotating-into-notnrotating desing. How many tonnes per sq.m. etc.
Tom,
Beautiful!
BUT, Earth radius? Show me it's possible in material strength, pls.
Why go at all over the proven diameters? - up to 5000km wide by using carbon.
Paul Birch.:
The maximum size of conventional rotating space colonies is determined largely by the strength of available
structural materials. The limit is about 250 km radius for quartz, 1000 km for sapphire, and 2500 km for
diamond.
The only practical Dyson Spheres are the Paul Birch supra- designs onto kinetic structures.
The inside-out 'classical' design relies upon 'gravity generators' which ... if we have grav-gens this is = to direct space-time control, so we won't need to terraform planets and stars but we'll build universes
http://www.popularmechanics.com/space/m … tmosphere/
SO easy!?
Very bold statements.:
According to simulation models, such a shield could help Mars achieve half the atmospheric pressure of Earth in a matter of years. With protection from solar winds, frozen CO2 at Mars's polar ice caps would start to sublimate, or turn directly into gas from a solid. The greenhouse effect would start to fill Mars's thin atmosphere and heat the planet, mainly at the equator, at which point the vast stores of ice under the poles would melt and flood the world with liquid water.
"Perhaps one-seventh of the ancient ocean could return to Mars," said Green.
Yes, OK, Good!
and with ... optics, incl. josh storrs hall weather machine, the sunlit vs night side becomes question unsubstantial.
Void,
in such compact system, it'd be quite easy to move volatiles down vs rocks and metals up ... the stellar gravity well, by using momentum exchange loops.
So excess/lack of water shall be balanced out.
Smaller stars = smaller proplyds = smaller 'giants'.
TRAPPIST-1 is only 80-ish Jovian masses, i.e. just on the upper borderline of brown dwarf-hood.
The good news is that such stars are REALLY plentiful, massive majority.
In fact all 7 are habitable by use of some optics - lenses/mirrors.
http://www.nextbigfuture.com/2017/02/na … gfuture%29
Strange/interesting nomenclature record, though - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trappists
"BUY land, advised Mark Twain; they’re not making it any more."
In fact - ... yet.
I have a question - how big qualifies for 'outdoors'?
Just a bit crap for those who live near sea level. eg me and 3 billion others.
Well, yes, but it would take centuries.
Plenty of time to dev the new coastlines.
Just to note that http://www.worlddreambank.org/D/DUBIA.HTM -ization of Earth IS landmaking, too.
OK, some coastal lands shall be drowned, but the deserts - cold and hot will disappear ( forests from pole to pole as it was few dozens of millions of years ago with approx. the same distro of water/land, continental pattern ... ) , hence the landmaking balance shall be positive by at least a factor of magnitude.
Opening up all ocean currents lines and creation of new ones will in fact stabilize the climate...
Just a little detail, not sure you would want to live on a undulating surface and getting seasick.
http://www.arch2o.com/wp-content/upload … son-03.jpg
This is an ocean platform prison. Now I don't know why they put windmills on the landing strip, it might get in the way of aircraft trying to land.
Tom,
Actually we ARE living on 'boats' - the slabs (1000s x 1000s mi linear sizes) of solider / ligher rock floating on top of softer / molten / denser rock beneath.
undulating, seasick - matter of phase-out wave tech, and/or size. Or earthquakes on terra 'firma'
What do you think on walk-commute timing criterion to distinguish between ship-n-island , between building-n-land?
Aside from the basic specs generalized in the quoted above wiki article, I insist it is matter of size / scale.
pad/seat -> floor/deck -> plot -> land -> world ...
A ship or raft turns into piece of land when it is country size - it is subjective human-size criterion, though ... a country-size seems connected with the time to cross it on feet / walking?
It seems the islands sizes / areas can give as a (historic) base for grokking the scaling?
"Country-size" whatever that means poses the boundary between "house"/"town" and "world" levels.
The issue for mars and moon is containment of the earth like water and air with artifical gravity following....
Approx. 1G is ... 1G optimum and deviation around 1G of ... dunno how much.
0.1 to 2G?
But talking about landmaking ( thus terraforming comes naturally down to 'realty development' in wide sense of the word = human HABITAT REPLICATION , i.e. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macrolife … .27s_title ), we mustn't forget that human habitats, i.e. means for support of body functions is fractal and concentric. Scaled. Scalable... We have, the linear ranges of (roughly):
1m - clothing, furniture, ...
10m - housing
100m - garden
1000m - neighbourhood, vilage
10 000m - urban, municipal
100 000m - regional, hinterland, agri ...
1000 000m - we enter the megascale herewith, wilderness, outback, ...
... further ahead is the void where the habitat is nested.
The habitat scales are nested into each other as these russian dolls. And the outer makes the livability of the inner ones.
===
The size scaling naturally inputs definitions. Levels of 'terraforming'.
Unified system of definitions which disregards the 'toposphere' tech involved - natural planetary crust, supramundane shell, walls of a rotating cylinder ...
Usually the word "terraforming" associsates with and connotates to changing planetary conditions towards more Earthlike ones.
BUT,
but ...
"Earthlike" is a trap.
Earthlike as ... what.: the Everest peak at winter night? as Mariana trench? as Death valley or other high desert at its hottest?
I think it is worth to start talking just 'LANDMAKING", cause all the 'terraforming', paraterraforming etc, ideas and 'projects' are aimed towards making new land.
Habitable by standard humans without excessive protection.
Regardless whether the object of terraforming efforts is.: the dry valleys of Antarctica, the lava tubes and craters of the Moon, the North Pasific Gyre, the high deserts of Africa, the surface of Mars, the clouds of Venus, or mass-stream grids toposphere around various super-massive underbodies, or ... the inner surfaces of centrifuges ...
LAND = approx. 1G surface where humans put their homes and where the manufacture of all needed to go to and from these homes takes place.