New Mars Forums

Actually, this hot spot is already observed with CIRS 

I don't know why people expect all the image processing done perfectly one hour after taking the pictures. This is for a very complex machine. People take for granted days if they shoot foto's of their own.

I guess people are spoiled wih MER and MOC.

edit - added a remark I made somewhere else

just a reminder, Huygens is an ATMOSPHERIC probe. The primary goal is to learn about the atmosphere. Unfortunately, atmosphere is not as suitable for taking pictures as surfaces, so the pictures may look a little dissappointing. However, the main value of this particular mission is not in its ability to take pictures (like it is for MER, which are geologic probes) but taking data from the atmosphere: the detailed composition of the air, isotopes, compositions and number of aerosols, clouds, temperature, you name it: all was measured by Huygens. This will take a while to process though, but will be very usefull.

I just had to link this...

http://homepage.mac.com/michaelhoward/m … ...igh.mov

get out your glasses!

I think there is simply nothing to report. let's not forget, SMART is NOT an imaging satellite, it's a technology demonstrator mission, and one of its main goals is to test the Ion engine and working with these engines in terms of energy use and orbital mechanics. and that's exactly what it is doing. I think we will have to wait till SMART is in its main science orbit before we get some more pictures.
But that won't be as many as for instance MOC, since this is ESA.
It's a bit unfortunate that ESA is releasing not nearly that many pictures from eg. MarsXpress, Envisat, SMART, but I think ESA is also a lot poorer than NASA. may not be an excuse... But I do think that the pictures they DO release are simply amazing And I like that flash Martian globe with the arrows sticking out of it 

http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.ph … old=0]more to come

even rockets (or Earth orbiting satellites) go faster than bullets, so something that's passing Earth from a hyperbolic orbit (velocity is larger than the escape velocity) will definately go faster.

bullet speed: up to 1500 m/s:
http://hypertextbook.com/facts/1999/Mar … eyra.shtml

Earth orbits: up to 8000 m/s:
http://www.marsacademy.com/traj/traj5.h … /traj5.htm

ehm...this doesn't look right. an extra acceleration of Phobos would increase its orbital height. I think they mean it the other way around. A decelration causes the height of the orbit to decrease, hence making it speed up (low orbits have higher velocities).

Europe will reach the moon in 10 days

http://www.esa.int/esaCP/SEM0M31A90E_in … dex_0.html

I always liked this one:

http://www.esa.int/export/externals/ima … ve/181.jpg

though it is faulty (Huygens will land on the anti-saturn side of Titan)

..though I suspect slowing down enough to land is the main problem here....

wopmay always looked like brains to me... 

some pretty pictures already! 

http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/i … ...138.jpg