You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
hmm, 5.7 metres is really much. since martian regolith seems to consist at large parts of iron (with a density of 7000-8000 kg/m3), i hope it is more dense than common sand on earth.
my inital idea was to put the regolith which was digged out of the crater on the top of the dome (through a hole on the very top which gets closed with some transluzent material later).
does anybody have a section through a "standard crater" on mars? i am interested on the ratio of diameter to depth.
i think that we really need some excavators first on mars. we have to remove all those stones in order to place some prefabricated buildings, we have to dig some regolith in order to extract the iron dust, we have to dig some ditches in order to build underground pipelines. and so on and so on.
greetings from germany
lmvdr
shaun,
of course it would be cool to live unter a transarent dome. i will have a look at the threads you mentioned.
regards,
christoph
sorry shaun & hazer,
i haven't read your message before writing the other one.
the 3.6 tonnes/m2 are not only caught by the regolith on the top but also by the construction of the geodesic dome. together they should keep the building in crater.
hazer, i don't know exactly what you mean with aerogel, but it sounds very expensive. why not pouring so much regolith on the building until it insulated well enough? there is enough regolith on mars to insulate the whole planet...
if the buidlings would be placed (for what reason ever) near the frosty poles, we could additionally powder them with some meters of snow, what would even increase the insulation.
see, there are enough holes on mars, so we don't need to dig new ones. and life on mars will be a life in caves. either surrounded by lithium-teflon-aerogel-whatever or regolith and a layer of cheap plastic.
note: usually i engaged in lightweight construction, but it seems to me that here are enough which fancy this type. so i just try to diversify the discussion a bit.
regards,
christoph
the shape of the cooling tower seems to be absurd when one remarks that buildings on mars tend to explode (insead of imploding like on earth).
to keep on the comparision to cooling tower: the buildings around nuclear power plants are usually mirrored U shape. this is the best shape for absorbing outer forces and for keeping it stable in case of a pressure inside.
i think this result from the ratio of volume to surface, which is highest for domes.
and as you mentioned: by lowering them into earth, the horizontal forces (resulting of the transformed vertical forces) get "eaten" by the surrounding ground.
i don't expect this construction as the perfect housing, but it would be cool for factorys and power plants. (they won't need daylight, which should be available for housings.)
regards,
christoph
hello shaun,
thank you for your answer. a few hours ago i stumbled at amazon about zubrin's book you've mentioned. unluckily it is not outselled in the german version at the moment. perhaps it should buy it in english so i would better unterstand the martian dialect here in the forum...anyway
since the mars has no ozone layer to destroy, why don't we equip the rovers with those v8 motors getting banned on earth at the moment? they would even emit less sound, because the martian atmosphere is so thin.
i'm sure that halliburton inc. will be pleased about the order to build a pipeline to mars...
getting more and more unserious
christoph
just to catch the idea of my posting: when there is so much water and carbon dioxide, which are the basics of every plant, why do we think about growing them in high-tech greenhouses instead of turning the mars in a great greenhouse and manipulating them to work out there???
regards,
lmvdr
dear john,
there is water packed in the polar caps, though i don't know the ratio.
i am wondering wether it would be possible to design a kind of bacterium which eats/smelts the ice and starts the greenhouse effect. just throwing a handy box with them on mars and the show begins! (without nuclear contamination.)
any biologist here?
planting some trees or whatever on the poles should be possible after modifying them on earth. we can simulate a martian atmosphere here - "air", temerature, air pressure, ground are no problem, only the gravity is 3 times higher on earth. (this is probably one of the smaller problems.)
sure, we won't be able to grow oaks or orchids on mars, but moss or fern are simple and minimalistic enough to get genetic manupulated.
anyway i prefer the bacteries. stopping them from population and stopping them from mutating could cause problems.
greetings from southern germany, where it is not less cold than on mars
lmvdr
hey john,
as far as i know, the polar caps on mars contain mostly dry ice (frozen co2!?). smelting it could initate a greenhouse effect which would warm up the whole martian atmosphere.
i don't think that we can calculate or even imagine the results of such a operation. why not trying it out on earth?! :angry:
what happens in your dream after blasting the ice? does the alarm clock ring?
greetings
lmvdr, just trying not to post questions all the time
does anybody have information about the martian atmosphere in general and information about how the sun radiations are filtered through it? what about ultraviolet light?
i expect there are greater amounts of it, since the martian atmosphere is more thin than on earth, right? on the other hand the mars is more than 1.5 times distanced from sun than the earth...
are photovoltaik panels on mars more efficient than on earth?
excuse me for asking this elemantary stuff, but as you might see, i am just a (maybe upcoming) junior member.
thanx
lmvdr
ps: how does beagle 2 do? i really hope they can find it and make it work. it is very, very important for old europe.
rxke,
thank you for your answer. the masses of ground and stones on the roof should prevent it from lifting. a geodesic dome resists pressure from outside as well as pressure from inside.
i will precise this idea tonight a bit.
greetings from southern germany
lmvdr
hey rxke,
since i don't plan to settle on mars during this week, it's okay when discussion starts at a low frequence... :;):
i am not a native speaker (as you), so please excuse me when my thoughts sound a bit confusing.
with "flat geodesic sphere" i mean a very low height, so that it is very flat.
this sketch of a section through the crater should help you to imagine my idea...
thanx
lmvdr
hey,
what do you think about the following idea:
a crater with a diameter around 50-200 meters gets roofed by a flat geodesic sphere construction, which gets packed by a stable but thin membran. (exept the very top of the construction.) now a excavator gets into the construction and makes it as deep as needed. the excavated ground gets crushed and filled outside on the geodesic sphere. (perhaps 1 or 2 meters thick.)
the inside of the crater can now be designed as needed. the hole on the top of the construction could be wrapped by translucent material. possible functions of the construction are:
- housing
- factories
- power plants
- farms and plantages
- scientific purposes
these are the benefits:
- roofed craters are better armed against sand stormes etc. then conventional "buildings"
- the mostly used construction material (the ground to isolate the roof) lies everywhere around and doesn't need to be factured and transported over wide distances
- the surface of the building (to the outside, not to the ground) is minimal to its volume. so the the efforts to hold the inside air pressure are also minimal.
of course this idea is very theoretical and utopic, but lets discuss it!
greetings
lmvdr
Pages: 1