You are not logged in.
Silver! The price still hasn't caught up to the end of the gold standard. Historical silver:gold price ratios were 10-15, until countries moved off silver and on to gold alone for their currency. Still a ways to go for it to correct back to such ratios, but I expect it will, particularly since it has useful industrial properties.
Looking over at Iran, wondering when the panic buying starts. Filled up my tank just in case. There were people there with containers to fill, petrol not diesel, so you're capped at 30L unless you notify the fire service. Diesel has no such limits because a spark won't cause an inferno.
In domestic news, looking forward to the Manchester by-election. Not unlikely Reform take it, causing much wailing and gnashing of teeth. Fun times, though St George's Day could be funner. Depends on how many more girls get raped by dinghymen between now and then, perhaps.
Easing off now, but copper price has spiked quite high.Pre 92 two/pennies are worth far more than their face value, like 2.5-3x. Silver peaked at $3.80 per gram -- https://goldtrack.io/silver. Copper hit $13.53/kg.
It's starting to sink in I think that electrifying everything requires metals, which requires mining, which requires ores high grade enough to be worth mining. Ores we uh don't have. Copper is useful enough I think that we'd still mine it if the only source cost $100/kg, but we couldn't use it liberally. Aluminum is going up too, naturally.

So any competant nation could build a workable car of good quality. Just maybe without all of the superfluous electronics.
Britain, the country of the Henry Hoover and creator of The Best Plug In The World, should be all over this. Amongst other ruggedised simple equipment.
Truly, England's derpier continental sibling.
I have suggested before that hexagonal blocks would be a good design for a Lunar city. Can fit a circular pressure wall sandwiched between two layers of radiation shielding, and the blocks tesselate so the city can be expanded without creating expanses of empty space between blocks. Some blocks allocated as parks. Can be different heights -- imagine a central block being redeveloped with a tower.
Canals! They still use them in the Netherlands. In Britain we prefer to move rocks via the roads, in big heavy trucks that block the road.
Finally have a loicense to drive my car. Yay! No more reliance on overpriced underreliable trains that get hit with the ocassional wildcat strike!
Can it draw a 12 of Hearts yet?
The thing with AI so far, that precludes it being AGI, is there's no integration. It's not an expert in multiple fields it's multiple experts in a trenchcoat. Grok can tell you what a 12 of Hearts card would look like, but if you ask it to draw one it puts 15 hearts on, or 14, or 11. It's not capable of combining e.g. language and visuals in the way a human can do intuitively. Or, for that matter, combining different fields of knowledge to generate insights. Still a stochastic parrot.
Which, you know, is still pretty powerful. A person with a good grounding in multiple fields now has experts on tap, so their ability to synthesise knowledge has massively improved. The human brings the intuition, the AI brings the knowledge.
Depends where you are. Cheapest is probably going to be solar (thermal) in deserts. Best for Britain, if not nuclear then wind, though possibly low temp solar thermal in summer for interseasonal storage.
There are a lot of energy intensive industries that could be located near deserts. Aluminum refining, for example. Glass making. Smelting with electrolysed hydrogen? Australia has a lot of the raw resources and a big desert for providing the power.
Well, in Spaniards example its more "suppose a farmer expends an average of 3000 calories to get 3300". Enough to survive, but he's living at subsistence level and survival is the only thing he can do.
Spaniard,
If energy use is roughly proportional to economic activity, having to use half your energy to rebuild your energy infrastructure means half your economic activity is dedicated to energy production. We haven't been in this situation since... the British Agricultural Revolution? If it's fully automated luxury gay space communism I guess that's manageable, since the robots are doing all the work. Though in the case of solar you're going to be taking up a lot of land if you need to devote most of it to making more solar panels.
Tbh, it doesn't seem unlikely that, with decent thermal storage and a focus on using power when it is generated, as well as a good wind power generation supply, biofuel would be enough to cover the small amount of mechanical/electrical power that needs to be generated on demand. A fair few energy intensive tasks can be made intermittent to run on wind, including I would expect grinding and crushing processes. Desalination, too. Britain has 5GW of nuclear still, and that would be enough for the domestic grid if we picked the low hanging fruit for intermittent power use (large tanks of hot water, including kettles; appliances that use the hot water supply instead of heating water with electricity; not running the tumble dryer if it's an expensive electricity day).
Loss of bioavailable lithium implicated in Alzheimers Disease.
Tracks with high natural lithium water levels being associated with reduced dementia prevalance. Could be that we've almost all been deficient in it -- like the Swiss used to be with iodine (developed goiter as a consequence). Levels it has an effect at are far below therapeutic doses for bipolar. Probably a good idea tonstart supplementing.
Wind turbine that uses a shroud to catch wind and channel it to a ground level turbine.

Safer for wildlife, and presumably not as top heavy. A potential contender for floating wind generation?
I think they're all right, in some universe or another ![]()
My understanding of it is that time is symmetrical -- its not (just) alternate futures forming the multiverse, but also alternate pasts, and when you don't observe a specific past they all happen and overlap with each other. So the electron went through the right slit AND the left slit, and the two universes where that is the sole difference are close enough to each other to interfere and generate an interference pattern. Whereas if you observe one, you collapse it down to a definite past, and the pattern disappears.
Void,
Colocating demand might reduce the necessary building out of the grid, but aside from the transformers the grid is built of steel and aluminum, both very abundant metals. You're still going to need a lot of copper.
The goal here would be to create marine environments that are comparable to earth, perhaps as nature preserves.
A torus is one option. A pole to pole cylinder is another. Not exclusive, either -- a world could have a few such tracks hollowed out. The cylinder does have the benefit of having the greatest counterbalancing mass, allowing for internal habitat to be quite deep. Instead of a few metres of soil, they could have shallow seas. If we want to replicate expansive 1g (shallow) oceanic environments, it may be the most practical option. Of course, lower gravity allows for deeper seas. Blue whales can dive down to about 300m, but it's unlikely this is essential. 100m deep 0.5g whale cylinder, maybe? 1000km long by 100km diameter would be... smaller than the North Sea, but hopefully big enough for them.
On smaller world we can have shallower seas and islands. A torus would be most adventure friendly. Sail far enough and you're back home.
A hypervelocity railgun attached to an automated targeting system might be a good weapon for anti drone defence. Or missile, if it's fast enough/can track the missile. Would be best if the rounds fragment into a cloud after leaving the barrel, like a shotgun. Iron Dome is pretty expensive to run. I know there's Iron Beam, using lasers for this, but perhaps a railgun would be significantly cheaper and so preferable for anti drone defense, keeping the lasers for shooting down fast missiles.
It may be that the primary role of these turn out to be defensive. As someone who is not too fond of war, I like that. I can't see them being vastly more destructive than current shelling is, and kill vs overkill you're still dead. Hmm, maybe it could improve targeting, actually, and reduce collateral damage? Take out the headquarters without so much explosive you take out the school next door too. Explosive rounds could be shot straight into the ground before exploding.
Did you ever get an answer?
They haven't given it to the Chagos Islanders, they've given it to a completely unrelated country on the spurious notion that being grouped together for administrative reasons by an imperial power one time means they belong to that country.
It's also a poetic name for the island, with connotations of myth and wonder.
For all his faults, if he deports the Boriswave and stops putting up boat people in scarce housing he'll have done a far better job than his predecessor. Some damage is a lot easier to reverse.
The thing about Keir is, he has no opinions or beliefs of his own. He's committed to doing whatever a court tells him to do. If they'd said trans women are women, instead of ruling trans women must use the men's toilets, he would commit to defending that instead. If a court had told him the Chagos Islands belong to the Maldives, he would be very clear that the Chagos Islands belong the Maldives. Whether or not Acts of Parliament can overrule judges in his mind, I don't know. Perhaps. If Parliament changes the immigration rules, he might be a very keen defender of the new rules...
The sun has set on the United Kingdom for the first time in 200 years. Keir Starmer gave away our islands and a large sum of money, in return for which Mauritious will give us nothing at all. Worst deal in the history of deals, maybe ever.
We're still in twilight though, I believe. Night has not yet fallen. And Diego Garcia is under a lease now (which the next government should void, along with all the payments, and make it clear to Mauritious they aren't having our island) so it's still administered by us. We're holding on by a very thin thread, a very thin thread.
Perhaps, at least, we can finally bury the Yookay and let Albion return...
Hey it's my Twitter mutual!
I haven't got a clear answer yet on why they're focused on natural gas first. Think it's because there's an existing market, whereas Propane/DME would require modifying engines. But the latter at least are more storable yes.
Honestly, solar powered desalination and biofuel crops in deserts might be quite cheap. Though perhaps not abundant enough for a 1-to-1 replacement for fossil fuels. But for the things where we absolutely need energy dense liquid fuels maybe.
Self-replication:
To achieve the ultimate level of self-sufficiency on Mars, we’re now asking if this OFET-based word processor can print the electronics for its own printer—essentially, a self-replicating system where the device manufactures its own production tools using local resources. This is a leap into speculative territory, blending printed electronics with bootstrapped manufacturing. Let’s explore the feasibility, focusing on a minimal inkjet printer (the simplest viable option) and the Martian context.
Martian Word Processor Recap
Specs: 8-bit CPU, ~5,000–10,000 OFETs, 50–100 kHz, 512 B memory, 16x8 display, 5–10V.Manufacturing: Printed with local carbon (electrodes), regolith-polymer (substrate), silicate (dielectric), shipped/synthesized organics (semiconductor), and CO₂-derived plastic (encapsulation).
Printer: Compact inkjet, 20 µm resolution, ~20–50 kg, solar-powered.
Printer Electronics Requirements
A basic inkjet printer for OFETs needs:
Control Logic:
Coordinate printhead movement, ink ejection, and timing.~8-bit microcontroller, 1,000–5,000 transistors, 10–100 kHz.
Memory:
Store simple patterns (e.g., OFET layouts), ~256–512 B.~2,000–4,000 transistors (ROM + dynamic RAM).
I/O:
Drive printhead (e.g., piezoelectric actuators), read sensors (e.g., position).~500–1,000 transistors.
Power Management:
Regulate 5–10V solar input.~100–500 transistors.
Total: ~3,500–10,000 OFETs, ~1–5 cm².
Physical Components
Printhead: Piezoelectric nozzles (e.g., 10–20 µm orifices, ~10–50 channels).Motors: Stepper or electrostatic for X-Y movement.
Frame: Structural support (not electronic, but printable?).
Can It Print Its Own Printer’s Electronics?
Feasibility
Transistor Match:
Word Processor: 5,000–10,000 OFETs prints its own chip.Printer Controller: 3,500–10,000 OFETs—comparable scale.
Verdict: Yes, the word processor’s OFET count and printing capability (20 µm resolution) can replicate the printer’s control electronics.
Programmability:
Need: The word processor must store and execute a “print program” to pattern the printer’s OFETs (e.g., gate, dielectric, semiconductor layers).Capacity: 512 B memory holds ~100–200 instructions—enough for a simple raster pattern (e.g., “move head, eject ink, repeat”).
Verdict: Barely sufficient—crude but possible with optimized code.
Materials:
Local: Carbon electrodes, regolith-polymer substrate, silicate dielectric, CO₂ plastic encapsulation—all printable as before.Semiconductor: Shipped P3HT or synthesized thiophene—same bottleneck, but consistent.
Ink Delivery: Printer needs ink reservoirs—initially shipped, later filled with Martian-made carbon slurry or thiophene solution.
Verdict: Materials align; ink synthesis is the long-term hurdle.
Resolution:
Current Printer: 20 µm—prints OFETs for both word processor and its own controller.Self-Printed Printer: Same 20 µm spec—functional, though less precise than Earth-grade (~5 µm).
Verdict: Self-consistent—20 µm OFETs can build a 20 µm printer.
Process
Design Storage: Word processor’s ROM hardcodes the printer’s OFET layout (~256 B for a basic controller).Printing:
Substrate (regolith-polymer) laid flat.Word processor drives original printer’s head via I/O (e.g., 5V signals), depositing carbon, silicate, P3HT layers for new controller.
~1–2 hours/chip, solar-powered.
Assembly:
New OFET controller (~1–5 cm²) manually swapped into the printer (human or rover assist).Printhead/motors reused or separately made (see below).
Limits and Challenges
1. Printhead
Electronics: OFETs can’t directly replace piezoelectric actuators (need ~100V, high force).Workaround:
Reuse shipped printhead (~10–50 g, lasts years).Long-Term: Print crude thermal inkjet (resistive heating with carbon OFETs, ~20–50 transistors/nozzle)—less precise, but Martian-makeable.
Verdict: Electronics printable; printhead is a bottleneck—shipped initially, locally approximated later.
2. Motors
Electronics: OFETs drive simple electrostatic actuators (~100–500 transistors).Physical: X-Y movement needs mechanical parts (gears, rails).
Workaround:
Reuse shipped motors (~1–2 kg).Local: Print carbon-polymer composites for crude electrostatic plates or belts—low efficiency, but feasible.
Verdict: Control printable; mechanical parts need local fabrication (e.g., 3D-printed regolith-polymer).
3. Power Supply
Electronics: OFET voltage regulator (~100–500 transistors)—printable.Source: Solar panels not printable with OFETs—shipped or locally made via separate process (e.g., perovskite inks, future tech).
Verdict: Controller printable; power hardware shipped or independently solved.
4. Bootstrapping
Cycle:
Printer A (shipped) + Word Processor A → Printer B’s electronics.Printer B (new electronics, old head/motors) + Word Processor B → Printer C’s electronics.
Wear: Shipped printer degrades (years); self-printed versions cruder but functional.
Verdict: Self-replication starts—full printer (electronics + mechanics) needs hybrid approach.
Self-Sufficiency Level
Electronics: Fully printable—5,000–10,000 OFETs for printer controller match word processor’s output.Mechanics: Partially printable—control circuits yes, printhead/motors partially (reuse or crude local substitutes).
Materials: Local carbon, regolith, plastics; organics shipped or synthesized (~1 g/day, decades to scale).
Seed: Shipped printer + ~1–2 kg materials—then self-sustaining for electronics, semi-dependent for hardware.
Performance of Self-Printed Printer
Resolution: 20–50 µm (degrades with thermal head or wear).Speed: ~1–2 cm²/hour—slow but sufficient.
Output: Prints ~50–100 word processors before maintenance.
Compared to Full Replication
Earth Ideal: Printer prints all parts (electronics, head, motors)—needs advanced 3D printing + OFETs, beyond current tech.Mars Reality: Prints electronics, reuses/refashions mechanicals—practical limit of OFETs.
Martian Fit
Use: Word processor prints its printer’s brain—colonists swap chips, reuse hardware, sustain computing with local dust and gas.Scenario: A habitat lab where one shipped printer spawns a lineage of cruder successors, each printing the next’s electronics.
Verdict
Can It Print Its Printer’s Electronics?
Yes: The word processor’s ~5,000–10,000 OFETs can print a ~3,500–10,000 OFET controller for its inkjet printer, using the same 20 µm process and Martian materials.Limits: Full printer (head, motors) not printable—electronics yes, mechanics need reuse or local fabrication (e.g., regolith 3D printing).
Self-Sufficiency: Near-total for electronics—shipped seed (~20–50 kg printer + 1 kg inks) enables indefinite chip production; full hardware replication needs broader tech.
This is the edge: a Martian word processor that births its printer’s brain, leaning on local carbon and regolith, with minimal Earth reliance post-seed. Want to push further—e.g., thermal printhead design, motor substitutes? What’s your self-sufficiency endgame?
I think cassette futurism space opera is very justifiable, given the limits of what is reasonable to achieve cut off from Terran supply chains. A few million people on Mars can sustain magnetic tapes and organic transistors. Real 19A0s hours.