New Mars Forums

Inside of Mars it is not a hostile environment .

It is a great place to hide out from space probes and surface crawlers.

ALL of the planets are semi-hollow.

GOD made them that way.

SRAM

I'm really not into X-Files, secret alien spaceships and the like. if you think planets are hollow, that is your theory not mine. A lot of people have a serious disconnect when someone mentions aliens.

Belinda,

The episodal model of Venus.

Trapped heat at Venus should make for a more active core, yet Venus has no magnetic field.

This could simply be the spin rate, or Venus didn't get a late large hit to stir it up.

Two planets being so similar ending up so differently just goes to show how small differences can make worlds of difference.

Venus might be the typical earth like planet in the universe.
Without late collisions and correct compositions all earth like places in the universe probably end up like it, or as frozen ice balls.   

It doesn't take much for a runaway greenhouse or runaway freeze on any earth like planet.

I think the moon is much more important than we give credit for.

SRAM,

Why wouldn't god go ahead and make molten planets?
Makes as much sense to create them that way.

If god is the creator then he could do whatever he wanted, not for us to decide what he did, just for us to understand the process.

SRAM:

(we scared off Belinda)

No way did you. I just went out for the day.

SRAM:

(we scared off Belinda)

No way did you. I just went out for the day.

Warm Mars with the Sun, Cook the Earth!

SRAM,

Specific gravity will force all the heavy atomic elements to the center of the earth, as long as the medium is liquid.
At the exact center of the earth where gravity is near 0 who is to guess what is there, but likely its heavy atoms also from simply being churned.

Our sun isn't at the center of our solar system, Jupiter, Saturn etc all perturb the sun.

You have some interesting ideas and i would be the first to agree that science is a long way from being able to make any relevant statement about anything.

Most people forget that just a short time ago people were burning people just for thought, and now we ridicule people with ideas that don't fit what is believed to be true.

Sad to think that technology has come this far, but mans mind has not taken any giant leaps.

Tripp, I'd honestly love to say I can see 'stunning' evidence of artificiality in that picture, but I can't!
    Certainly, some things look out of the ordinary, but the detail seems blurry and the objects could as easily be natural formations, in my opinion.

    But I'm not a born debunker! The 'glass worms' of Mars look mighty suspicious to me, and their NASA designation as sand-dunes seems preposterous. I've yet to hear a satisfactory explanation.
    The Face and other anomalies at Cydonia are still on my list for future clarification, too.
    I refuse to dismiss awkward evidence until I'm satisfied personally that an adequate explanation has been provided.

    In the face (sorry! ) of a strong reluctance in the human psyche to rethink fondly-held views, even among scientists, it is crucial that we all keep an open mind.
                                           

*I'm with Shaun on this one.  I checked out your web site, Tripp.  No offense intended, but I'm highly skeptical as well.  We'll find out for sure once humans land on Mars, or in the event any robots on the surface do further and extensive work; however, I'm holding out for the humans. 

--Cindy

I am just point out that you need to propose why the sun is where it is.

Also if gravity is weaker then you need another force to explain what is holding the planets together and preventing them from flinging themselves apart.

You need to add something to the theory is all. Such as a structural explanation of how your planetary models hold together.

SRAM:

That site does not address the problems of centripetal stress, or large asteroid strikes among other things. Unless they were attempting to postulate a theory of gravity where gravity tries to move everything into spheres... But then why is the Sun at the center of the system. The Hollow Planets model would be more plausible if there was nothing at the center of the solar system.

  >>>>>>><<<<<<<

It cannot  be a solar system if there is no centroid sun.

( Are there any systems without a centroid sun(s) ? )

That is the point. To fit the hollow planets model, the Sun should have formed something closer to a Dyson Sphere out where Jupiter is, with hollow planets orbiting just inside and outside of the Sun.

SRAM:

That site does not address the problems of centripetal stress, or large asteroid strikes among other things. Unless they were attempting to postulate a theory of gravity where gravity tries to move everything into spheres... But then why is the Sun at the center of the system. The Hollow Planets model would be more plausible if there was nothing at the center of the solar system.