You are not logged in.
At least it's rambling of a high standard!
Interesting stuff.
Maybe it's simply dawning on NASA that public opinion is moving against them because of the LEO 'ho-hum' effect.
There is a famous saying, whose author I can't recall now, which goes: "The prospect of imminent death concentrates the mind wonderfully."
A mood of 'maybe we better shape up before we get shipped out' might be developing in the NASA corridors of power.
We can only hope! ???
Greetings right back at ya, el scorcho!!
Nice to have your company. And a thoughtful first post, too.
But just to bring you up to speed, NovaMarsollia is currently 'persona non grata' at this site. S/he broke too many rules of social interaction and fell foul of Adrian, our site creator, adjudicator, and moderator.
And that takes some doing, too, because our Adrian is slow to anger and quick to forgive!
We think he's pretty cool .... take a bow, Adrian!
And thanks again for all you do for us.
Hi Phobos!
I'm with you on this Huygens probe mission. I hardly dare to think about those first pictures from beneath the Titanian clouds, in case something goes wrong and the mission fails!
For me, if it's successful, witnessing such an alien panorama will be one of the high points of my life ... on a par with seeing those first Viking pictures of Mars!
Does anybody know if the pictures will be in colour? Or is the light too dim to see colours properly anyway?
:0
Do I detect yet another weakness, Cindy?!
To respond to Cindy's earlier post, I have just the same trouble trying to imagine changing gears right handed! It would feel weird to us southpaw drivers. And you'd have to steer with your left hand while changing with the right ... !
Hmmm. I suppose it's just what you get used to but, if I ever have to drive in America, I'm going to make sure they give me an automatic!!
As for the centre of the galaxy, I don't believe I've ever been able to distinguish a noticeable blob of light. When we lived in the wheat belt of outback Victoria (south-eastern Australia), with some of the widest skies you can imagine and the ability to escape easily the light pollution of the town, I remember how vivid the milky way looked on a clear frosty night. Its edges were 'ragged' and the boundaries indistinct, because so many stars were visible I guess. But no, I don't remember one particular area being more prominent. Sorry!
Yeah, Phobos! My Dad and I had a ball working on that Ford! It was a 1966 Cortina (I don't think you had those in the good ol' USA.) and all non-metric. We replaced the front suspension, the brakes, and the clutch, but the rust got the better of us in the end!
Although I don't work on cars much any more, I still have a mixture of metric and non-metric tools in my toolbox. Many of the non-metric ones inherited from my father.
Since I have wrenches of all shapes, sizes, and denominations, I haven't had occasion to go looking for any in hardware stores in recent years. But I guess you could probably find a 3/8'' wrench if you needed one because of all the old cars still on the road. Interesting question!
I hadn't heard the tragic news that the Australian government has defected to the Empire. No doubt Vader is behind all the arrests.
But fear not! The Jedi are not easily defeated and we will turn the tide. May the Force be with you!
Your friend, Obi-Wan Shaunobi.
Have to shampoo my hair again tonight ... so hard with this steel helmet on ... and the RUST!! It's worse than the Cortina! Maybe if I just slip it off for a few moments ... Ooohh, can feel NASA's influence ... and Vader ... they're all in it together! ... Brain hurts ... feel dizzy .... falling .. HELP!!
Hi Rob S!
You raise some interesting points I've never considered before.
But your fears may be unfounded ... I hope!
The winds on Mars are fast-moving, to be sure, but changing the mass of the atmosphere will doubtless have an effect on this, and I think the effect should be in our favour.
The driving force behind high speed winds on Mars today is usually a large temperature gradient, unless I'm mistaken. A dense CO2 atmosphere of, say, 1 bar, will be much more efficient as a moderating influence on large temperature differences than the present thin atmosphere. It should act as a blanket to keep the colder areas from getting as cold, for instance.
And CO2 is a heavy gas. Getting large masses of it moving at high speed will be difficult, especially at 227 million kilometres from the sun where the total heat input is relatively low. Even though Venus gets more than 4 times the insolation Mars gets, its wind speeds have been measured at literally a few kilometres per hour on the surface. Why? Because the atmosphere is so heavy.
I admit the Venusian atmosphere is very much denser than we visualise for Mars but the principle is the same.
With the 1 bar atmosphere mentioned, I would be surprised if average wind speeds on Mars exceeded half the average for Earth.
In addition, with a dense CO2 atmosphere, laced with traces of even more potent super-greenhouse gases, I believe the amount of liquid water on the surface, and more importantly as vapour in the air, will be quite large. I base this prediction on the results, so far, of the Odyssey orbiter's successful search for water in the upper regolith and my own gut feeling that there is even more water yet to be discovered.
Water, as you pointed out, is a very effective 'dampener' (Sorry! ) of dust storms on Earth, and I expect water to play its part in controlling dust on Mars.
As for domes being less stable if not supported by enormous pressure differentials, how big could a geodesic dome be made in Martian gravity? Pretty big I would imagine.
And we wouldn't need such massive foundations to hold it down, either.
Any thoughts?
Oops!!
When I made that last warning post, my missing THREE identical posts appeared!
I don't know what's going on here, but I'll now delete the extraneous copies.
Apologies if it was my fault all this happened! :0
Beware!!
I made a post here and attempted to submit it ... three times. It didn't appear.
I've discovered it can be accessed in the "Add Reply" section (three times! ... Sorry! )
???
Auqakah writes:-
Whether life existed first here or on Mars is pretty much a moot point, as far as the terraformation of Mars is concerned, though, isn't it?
Yes and no!
The important point is whether any life on Mars is based on the same 20 amino acids, 19 of which are laevorotatory, as the life on Earth. If so, then we are dealing with ONE origin of life. Then the answer to your question is yes.
It would be very INTERESTING to know which planet this ONE basic system of life developed on first, but as far as terraforming is concerned, it would be relatively unimportant.
If it transpires that Martian life is based on different amino acids, or a different system of compounds entirely, then the answer to your question becomes DON'T TERRAFORM!! At least as far as my ethics are concerned.
You may feel differently about it on the basis that life might well be common in the universe. But we don't know that yet. And even if we have a million fundamentally different life-systems in our galaxy, I'm inclined to think each one has intrinsic value and we should consider carefully whether we have the right to muscle in on its ecology.
From my point of view (as most of you know, to your cost, from my incessant lecturing! ), the good news is there's virtually no chance at all that Martian life and terrestrial life will be different.
If Mars is sterile, I'll eat my hat. If the life there is fundamentally different, I'll eat my head!!
From such a keen student of philosophy, Cindy, I would expect no less!
(Shucks, ma'am! Fact is, I'm on your side. Hell ... a diamond ain't nuthin' but a pile o' soot by a diff'rent name, anyways!! )
Thanks Cindy!
Absolutely no need to apologise, though. I'm probably one of the worst offenders when it comes to responding to posts. Sometimes it's lack of time at that particular moment, combined with forgetfulness later! Sometimes it's just failing to realise someone has asked me something.
If I've failed to reply to anybody with a query, I offer MY apologies now! ???
Chile rellenos sound very very tasty! And the pictures you so kindly provided have helped to round out my education about the local produce in your neck of the woods.
As a result of your taste-bud-tempting description, I have resolved to visit New Mexico before I die and sample the culinary delights! Thanks again!
Cindy writes:-
And diamonds aren't a girl's best friend...BOOKS are!!
Gosh, things are really changing!
Sometimes I think I'm falling further and further behind the times ... !! :0
But then, I still know at least one woman who'd take a diamond over a copy of "War and Peace" any day of the week! And she happens to be not very far from where I'm sitting right this minute.
Phobos ponders:-
I wonder if there will ever be technology that could survive a descent clear down to Jupiter's solid core. That would be an adventure indeed.
Didn't you read Cindy's post properly, Phobos?! About the diamond core?
I advocate putting the WOMEN in charge of your little mission, and making Cindy the project manager!
Once we tell 'em there's a 10 billion carat flawless white diamond at Jupiter's core, you can stop worrying about the technology .... those gals will DEFINITELY find a way!!!
The answer to both questions is: The CORRECT side, of course!!
OK OK ! We drive on the left side of the road and the steering wheels are on the right side of the car.
Apparently, in more violent times, when two men approached each other on a road, they would keep the other guy on their right side. This was because most people were right-handed and their right arm was their sword arm. If they suddenly had to defend themselves, well ... you get the point ... Sorry!! No pun intended.
Up until the late 1700s, travelling on the left side of the road was pretty much universal.
Then, along came Napoleon, who happened to be left-handed! To suit his own sinistrality, he insisted all his troops travel on the right side of the roadways as they conquered most of Europe. He then insisted that everyone in the conquered territories should travel on the right side too!
From then on, it was a war of influence. Everywhere the British went, they perpetuated the 'driving on the left side of the road' tradition, and everywhere the French went, they did the opposite. (As has so often been the case with the British and the French! )
It seems French influence in North America and Canada outweighed British influence, and the fledgling USA wanted to discard as many British customs as possible, so people travelled on the right. Since America was the first country to mass-produce reliable automobiles in large quantities, and because they were all made for driving on the right, the outcome of this war of influence was effectively decided for most of the rest of the world. ... The French won!
But the British were no slouches! Somewhere around 30% of the world's population drive on the left.
As well as Australia and New Zealand (our neighbours across the Tasman Sea), 62 other countries have their steering wheels on the right side of the car. They include Britain (of course), Ireland, Japan (feudal reasons of their own, not Britain's), Hong Kong, India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Malta, Nepal, much of the Carribean, and most of Africa!
Phew!! Sorry Cindy .... but YOU ASKED!!!
Great New Mars logo, Adrian! I've always liked it too.
One question, though. It may be an optical illusion, but is the diameter of the red crescent a tad on the small side compared to the diameter of the blue crescent? Or are they actually scaled correctly in accordance with the ratio of the diameters of Earth and Mars?
Very small point, I know, and, in the great scheme of things, of little or no significance to anybody! But I was just curious, that's all.
Thanks, Byron! It's always nice to think one's ideas are well received.
The idea of using water is probably a better idea for cleaning up the 'fines', as it neutralises the potential problem of electrostatic charge. As we all know, dust moving around in an air current can become charged and tends to stick to surfaces.
Blowing the dust off a table will get rid of maybe 95% of it, but you can't beat a damp cloth or sponge for really getting the surface clean!
What I was hoping to do, though, was to keep to a very simple, low-tech solution to the problem. Adding the plumbing required for water based cleansing made me nervous!
???
Phobos writes:-
I've done that with cars before. I have a bad time remembering where I park in big parking lots and more than once I've found myself trying to get into somebody else's car. God forbid the day my key actually fits!
I've actually gone one step further down that road, Phobos!
The worn out key to my old green Ford seemed a little sticky in the lock as I opened the door and hopped into 'my' car. As I put the key in the ignition, I became aware that the dashboard and the knick-knacks on the parcel shelf looked strangely unfamiliar!
I swear it took 2 or 3 seconds before the realisation of what I had done came flooding into my brain.
I got out of 'my' car, a little quicker than I got in, locked the door pretty smartly, and moved away from the vehicle!!
Never again, I hope!
I choose number 3, because if we're ever going to stand a chance of pushing one of these babies off a collision course with Earth one day, we really should try to find out more about their structure.
As some of you know, I'm not convinced of the validity of the 'super-oxides in the Martian soil hypothesis". Accordingly, I'm not convinced that Martian dust is going to be dangerous to inhale.
However, I'm not going to grind that axe today. ("Alleluia! And may the Lord be praised!", I hear you all shout!! )
On the other hand, I am prepared to admit that fine dust is probably going to be a nuisance at best, and maybe dangerous at worst, if it affects vital equipment.
Would it be feasible to build a valve into the airlock doors so that when the astronauts returning from excursions are dusting themselves off and removing their suits, air is constantly leaking out of the Hab into the airlock, and then out into the open air? In other words could we arrange for 'negative pressure' in the airlock, the way they do with biohazard facilities?
At least this way we might be able to keep the vast majority of dust outside where it belongs!
:0
After a quick look around on Google, I've given up on finding anything that could form a liquid ocean on Pluto, except nitrogen. And, even then, nitrogen is unlikely to be liquid for much of Pluto's year (if at all) because of its melting point.
It seems to be the general consensus of opinion that Pluto's average surface temperature is about 40 deg.K (or about -233 deg.C), ranging between maybe 30 and 60 deg.K. But nitrogen doesn't melt until you get up to 63.1 deg.K.
I think I may have to withdraw my wild speculation about oceans on Pluto!
And I think our friend with the axe in his head may have to reconsider his largely unsubstantiated hypothesis that groups of eskimos have taken up residence there, too!!
With regard to rotating tethers, Rob S writes:-
While the tip is stationary one can drop off one payload and attach another.
It seems like you'd have to be pretty sure of where the tip was going to 'touch down'. Would the system be too vulnerable to slight drifting of the tether's orbit?
Also, how much time do you get to detach and attach the payloads, and does it matter which operation is performed first?
I've probably got it all wrong but it sounds like it could be a frantic exercise for the ground crew!
Please forgive my irreverence but I could almost imagine it as the basis for a Laurel and Hardy comedy sketch! No offence intended.
A nice come back on that, Phobos. I stand corrected on the degree of unexpectedness. That David Tholen is one smart cookie and must be preening his feathers now his prediction has been validated!
Actually, since my last post here, I've been thinking about Earth's oceans being a heat sink and affecting our climate. It occurred to me that maybe Pluto has oceans too.
I know they've been hypothesising that Titan could have seas of liquid hydrocarbons and 'continents' of granite-hard water ice.
What kind of hydrocarbon, if any, could remain liquid under Plutonian conditions? I was wondering whether Pluto might have hydrocarbon oceans which, for at least the perihelion part of its orbit, would be liquid, but which might largely freeze during the aphelion phase?
Such a freeze/thaw cycle could provide a mechanism for the seasonal temperature lag we're seeing.
I have no idea what I'm talking about, of course! These are just random thoughts.
Am I just dreaming, or is it feasible?
:0
Sounds like you've put a great deal of thought into this, Rob.
It all sounds very promising to me. The only question I have, is whether or not you anticipate any problems with subsidence as the water is removed from the well?
Byron, that was beautiful stuff!!
If my enthusiasm was flagging before, it certainly isn't now!
What you've written sums up so much of how I imagine it would be to live and work on Mars. Your words reveal how well you've visualised the whole thing.
Excellent! Thank you.