New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#2301 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Zero energy trajectories - a thread to discuss this topic » 2004-03-28 16:33:06

Martin Lo uses a planner three body model ((earth, sun, spacecraft) or (earth,moon, spacecraft) when developing the theory behind the trajectories. Thus the theory for going from earth to mars should not depend on the position of the moons. Thus there should be at least one possible trajectory every year. I suspect if these manifold trajectories are too slow the space craft could start on one and due some kind of elliptical trajectory once the craft was past earth L2.

#2302 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Zero energy trajectories - a thread to discuss this topic » 2004-03-28 16:26:41

As I understand it one a space ship reaches earth L1 it can go to earth L2 for practically free. I am not sure what velocity it has when it reaches earth L2 but I think if the initial conditions are right it can probably continue all the way to mars L1. The space craft must pick up some velocity when traveling by earth (I think?). A space craft can also go from earth L1 to lanner orbit with practically know fuel. This is called a ballistic capture. There was a Japanese probe called Hiten, that used some of these principles. (see [http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~mwl/publicat … Energy.pdf]Low energy transfer to the moon). I am curious how much delta V it takes to land on the moon from lunar orbit.

#2303 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-28 16:18:18

I worked out the eqution of the ellips that has one focus of the sun and the other focus given by the coordinates (f1,f2)

It is:
a1 x^2+a2 x +a3 x y + a4 y +a5 y^2 =a6
a1=(4 d^2 - 4 (f1 -s1))
a2=s k (f1 -s1) - 8 d^2 s1
a3=-8 (f1-s1) (f2-s2)
a4= 2 k (f2 - s2) - 8 d^2 s2
a5 4 d^2 -4(f2-s2)^2
a6=(||f||^2-d^2)^2+(||s||^2-d^2)2-d^4

where
d is the sum of the distance from each foci to a point on the ellips
(s1,s2) are the coordinates of the sun
(f1,f2) are the coordinates of the second foci
k=||f||^2-||s||^2-d^2
||f|| denotes the maginitude of the postion vector giving the location of the second foci

#2304 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Earth to LEO - discuss » 2004-03-28 16:08:34

NASA successfully tested the scram jet at Mach 7. It is only a matter of time before: military fighters can go to the moon, flights from Canada to Australia only take 1 and a half hours and people start flying to space hotels. The world is changing.

#2305 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Zero energy trajectories - a thread to discuss this topic » 2004-03-28 15:58:43

I hope I understand this right.

“The Genesis trajectory (see Figure 6.1(a)) was designed using
dynamical systems theory. The three year mission, from launch all the way to Earth return, requires only
a single small deterministic maneuver (less than 6 m/s) when injecting onto the halo orbit.” (from section 6 of [http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~mwl/publicat … eeBody.pdf](1))

Thus to get to earth L1 from LEO only requires a delta v of 6 m/s. However because systems exhibiting chaos are very sensitive to initial conditions some fuel is required to make corrections.


“ The most important error in the launch
of Genesis is the launch velocity error. The one sigma expected error is 7 m/s for a boost of nearly 3200
m/s from a circular 200 km altitude Earth orbit. Such an error is large because halo orbit missions are
extremely sensitive to launch errors. Typical planetary launches can correct launch vehicle errors 7 to 14
days after the launch. This correction maneuver is called TCM1, being the first TCM of any mission. In
contrast, for orbits such as the Genesis transfer trajectory, the correction maneuver ?V grows sharply in
inverse proportion to the time from launch. For a large launch vehicle error, which is possible in Genesis’
case, the TCM1 can quickly growb eyond the capability of the spacecraft’s propulsion
“(from section 6 (The Trajectory Correction Maneuver (TCM) Problem) 0f [http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~mwl/publicat … eeBody.pdf](1))

Thus more fuell is needed to correct for errors when going from LEO to earth L1 then is needed to go from LEO to L1.

“Moreover, for all cases that we investigated, the optimal costs are well within the
?V budget allocated for trajectory correction maneuvers (450 m/s for the Genesis mission). The cost
function is very close to being linear with respect to both TCM1min time and launch velocity error. Also,
the halo orbit insertion time is always close enough to that of the nominal trajectory as not to affect
either the collection of the solar wind or the rest of the mission.”(from section 6 (Halo Orbit Insertion (HOI) Problem.) 0f [http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~mwl/publicat … eeBody.pdf](1))

Thus 450 m/s is more then sufficient fuel to go from LEO to earth L1.

#2306 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Zero energy trajectories - a thread to discuss this topic » 2004-03-26 10:05:30

I noticed one of the papers was titled invariant [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Manifold.html]manifold [http://www.control.lth.se/~funonlin/200 … slides.pdf](1) [http://www.math.vt.edu/people/renardym/ … ode18.html](2). I understand a center manifold to be a subspace for which trajectories either approach or diverge from. One special case of a manifold is a [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LimitCycle.html]limit cycle. A limit cycle is a closed trajectory for which other trajectories are either attracted two or diverge from. Approximate solutions to limit cycles can be found using [http://www.ee.unb.ca/jtaylor/Publicatio … _final.pdf]describing function analysis. I wonder if I can find approximate solutions to some of the zero energy trajectories using describing functions.

#2307 Re: Not So Free Chat » Any poets? - Comments, CONSTRUCTIVE critisism, ideas. » 2004-03-25 13:48:46

The Cosmos in chaos

Region, opium, television, dreams and stories
Productivity, hard work and innovation.
A collision of contradiction,
An explosion
Joy, depression, sadness rejoice
The human equation
Dynamics
Unknown states
Chaotic results
And an end but
a beginning
Changing manifolds in fractal geometry
A beauty that is seen in a
Chaos of sound bites
The infinity of the continuum
Of ideas
Dwarfing the boxed
Ideas of our time
Woven by billions
The tapestry of time
The disjoint threads unite
Into a story
Stringing an order
A cosmos

#2308 Re: Interplanetary transportation » E=mc² » 2004-03-25 13:14:17

If you go argue this stuff on sci.relativity. You will here at least 10 people say that photons have mass but know rest mass. You will then see about 10 "crack pots jump in" and the discussion will quickly deteriorate. Even in special relativity, there is a more general equation then E=mc^2. IIRC the general equation includes a term due to rest mass mc^2 and a term due to momentum. In the case of light the momentum comes from the wavelength. With E=mc^2 you can conclude interesting things, especially using the particle wave duality. But I think it is only an approximation and better more general formulas exist.

#2309 Re: Interplanetary transportation » LEO to TMI - discuss » 2004-03-25 13:00:28

I liked drinking carona  on the lieto deck by the pool, well sun tanning under the UV lights.

#2310 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-25 12:41:59

There seems to be a lot of discussion about these minimum energy tunnels. Although they are interesting, I am still interested in more classical transfer orbit. I was thinking of next finding the plane of a more realistic orbit from the actual coordinates I found. Then I will try and compute the transit time for this orbit. I will then compute the delta v for the this orbit with the minimum d value. I will then compute the orbit for 1.5 times the minimum d value. I will then try to write code to plot the delta v and transit time to go from a single point on earth’s trajectory to each point on the trajectory of mars. Several of these curves will be plotted on the same graph. Each curve will be for different multiples of the minimum value of d. any suggestions?

Recall I used d to represent the sum of the distance from each foci of the trajectory.

#2311 Re: Interplanetary transportation » LEO to TMI - discuss » 2004-03-25 11:54:39

In such a ship you could:
-explore the entire solar system in luxory
-transport people between the L points of planets with miniamal energy
-learn how to live in space
-have a huge labratory for research into medical an material science.
-have a safe haven to escape to when exploring any planet

#2312 Re: Interplanetary transportation » LEO to TMI - discuss » 2004-03-25 11:14:33

If it is in LEO it will take it forever to go to L1 with an ion engine. Requiring the station to rotate means that the materials used to make it must be stronger (For instance the solar panels). If it cost more then a billion to build there will be very few ever made.

#2313 Re: Interplanetary transportation » LEO to TMI - discuss » 2004-03-25 10:48:16

and the space station either rotates or we have another way to counter act zero g.

#2314 Re: Interplanetary transportation » LEO to TMI - discuss » 2004-03-25 10:46:30

It just depends on how we travel. Remember the L1 space station? Maybe we will eventually learn how to build a space station that doesn't leek, recycles 99.9% of its wast, protects the crew from radation and micro meteriotes, has an ion thruster and cost under a billion to build.

#2315 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-25 07:51:57

abstract from:
[http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~mwl/publicat … stract.pdf]http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~mwl....act.pdf
Paper at: [http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~mwl/publicat … ateway.pdf]http://www.gg.caltech.edu/~mwl/publicat … ateway.pdf

The Lunar L1 Gateway: Portal to the Stars and Beyond
Martin Lo, Shane Ross
Our Solar System is interconnected by a vast system of tunnels winding around the Sun generated by
Lagrange Points of all the planets and their moons. These passageways are identified by portals around
L1 and L2, the halo orbits. By passing through a halo orbit portal, one enters this ancient and colossal
labyrinth of the Sun. This natural Interplanetary Superhighway System (IPS) provides ultra-low energy
transport throughout the Earth’s Neighborhood, the region between Earth’s L1 and L2. This is enabled
a coincidence: the current energy levels of the Earth L1 and L2 Lagrange points differ from that of the
Earth-Moon by only about 50 m/s (as measured by rV). The significance of this happy coincidence
the development of space cannot be overstated. For example, this implies that lunar L1 halo orbits are
connected to halo orbits around Earth’s L1 or L2 via low energy pathways. Many of NASA’s future
observatories located around the Earth’s L1 or L2 may be built in a lunar L1 orbit and conveyed to the
destination via IPS with minimal propulsion requirements. Similarly, when the spacecraft or instruments
require servicing, they may be returned from Earth libration orbits to the Lunar L1 orbit where human
servicing may be performed. Since the lunar L1 orbit may be reached from Earth in less than a week,
infrastructure and complexity of long-term space travel is greatly mitigated. The same orbit could reach
point on the surface of the Moon within hours, thus this portal is also a perfect location for the return
human presence on the Moon. The lunar L1 orbit is also an excellent point of departure for interplanetary
flight where several lunar and Earth encounters may be added to further reduce the launch cost and
the launch period. The lunar L1 is a versatile hub for a space transportation system of the future.

#2316 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-25 07:25:52

Wouldn't an ice asteroid be a commet? Comments have a natural thrust.

#2317 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-24 12:22:46

More on A simple example (1) (Finding the second Focus)

In the previous example the transfer orbit started where earths orbit crossed  the point (1,0) and arrived where the orbit of mars crossed the point (-1.5,0). The second focus was found to be at the point (-0.5,0). Because that the minimum d for which an elliptical solution will exist will be the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohmann_transfer_orbit]Hohmann transfer orbits (I think), when the two transfer orbit intersects the original orbit and the destination orbit are on opposite sides of the sun.
Hohmann_transfer_orbit.jpg
The transfer time is given by the equation,

t=pi*sqrt((ro+r2)^3/(8*Gm))
where:

r0 is the radius of the intial orbit
r2 is the radius of the final orbit
Gm is the gravitational parameter (3.986x10^5 km^3/s^2)

The [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Apoapsis.html]apoapsis is the point of the transfer orbit furtherst away from the sun. Note this is also where the transfer orbit intersects the orbit of mars. The [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Periapsis.html]periapsis is the point where the transfer orbit is closest to the sun. Note this is also where the transfer orbit intersects the orbit of earth.

The [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SemimajorAxis.html]semi major axissemi major axis of the transfer orbit is half the distance between the apoapsis and periapsis.
a=||(1,0) – (-1.5,0)||/2=2.5/2


The [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/SemiminorAxis.html]semi minor b axis can be found by using simple triganomatry. At the semi minor axis each foci is d/2 away and the distance between the foci is ||(0,0)-(-0.5,0)||=0.5. The resulting triangle formed is an [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IsoscelesTriangle.html]isocialise triangle. Half of an isocialise triangle is a [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RightTriangle.html]right angle triangle. In this right angle triangle the hypotensis is d/2, the distance from one foci to the cener of the ellipse is 0.25. Thus the third side can be found using the [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PythagoreanTheorem.html]Pythagorean Theorem.
b=sqrt((d/2)^2-(0.25/2)^2)=(1/2)*sqrt(6.5) ~ 1.27

#2318 Re: Unmanned probes » Spirit & Opportunity *5* - Let's start with new NASA conference! » 2004-03-24 11:24:58

I thought that the rovers wern't sophisticated enough to identify a fossial.

#2319 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-24 07:24:02

A simple example (1) (Finding the second Focus)

I’d like to work out a simple example first. For now assume mars and earth are in the same plane and have circular orbits. The distance earth is from the sun is 1 AU (astronomical unit) and mars is approximately 1.5 AU. For simplicity let the initial point of the earth be at (1,0) in rectangular coordinates and the let the transfer orbit take intersect the orbit of mars at the point (-1.5,0).

Recall the second focus can be found with the intersection of the two circles:
||f-e||=d-||s-e||
||f-m||=d-||s-m||
e is the position vector of the earth (1,0)
m is the position vector of where the transfer orbit will intersect the orbit of mars (-1.5,0)
f is the second focus the transfer ellipse.
The distance between where the transfer orbit intersects the orbit of mars and earth is 1-(-1.5)=2.5.
The two circles will just touch each other when:
d-||s-e||+d-||s-m||=2.5
which implies
d=(2.5+||s-e||+||s-m||)/2=(2.5+1 +1.5)/2=2.5

When two circles just touch each other the intersection will be on a line between there two centers. More specifically it will be at d-||s-e||=1.5 away from the earth and d-||s-m||=1 away from where the transfer orbit intersects the orbit of mars. The coordinates of the intersection are therefore (1,0)+(-1.5,0)=(-1.5,0)+(1,0)=(-0.5,0)

Hence the location of the second focus is (-0.5,0)

#2320 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-24 06:57:14

You're right. That near [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplane … perhighway]zero energy transfer stuff  is very interesting. I guess  Hohman was wrong when he showed that the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hohmann_transfer_orbit]Hohman transfer orbit  was the most energy efficient way to travel.

#2321 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-23 13:55:49

silly me. There is always an elliptical trajectory. There just isn't one for every value of d (the some of the distance from each foci).

#2322 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-23 13:29:28

I’m glad to see there is some interest in this topic. My section on finding the ellipse I made more complicated then it needs to be. The second focus can be found by intersecting two circles. This could be done on a piece of graph paper without the aid of a calculator or a computer. The center of one of the circles is the location of the earth. The location of the second circle is the location of the mars. The radius of the circle with earth as its center is: d-||s-e|| and the radius of the circle with mars as its center is: d-||s-m||.
Note:
||s-e|| denotes the [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/L2-Norm.html]norm (magnitude or length) of the vector s-e:
s is the [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/RadiusVector.html]position vector of the sun
e is the position vector or the earth
m is the position vector of mars.


If you would rather use a calculator then a piece of graph paper, then the intersection could be found using the [http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LawofCosines.html]law of cosines.

Also note that if:
d>max{||s-e||,||s-m||}=||s-m||
and the intersection of the two circles exists then two elliptical transfer exsit, one focus is the sun and the other focus of either of the two points of intersection. There is always a possible hyperbolic transfer orbit.

#2323 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-23 12:57:50

Here are the coordinates of  mars from the [http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/space/helios … 0054659957]website:

You submitted the following name/value pairs:

planet = 02
resolution = 60
start_year = 2004
start_day = 1
stop_year = 2006
stop_day = 1
MARS coordinates:


YYYY DDD   AU     ELAT   ELON     HLAT   HLON   HILON
2004   1   1.475    0.04   51.08      3.07  116.12  335.44
2004  61  1.552    1.01   82.82      0.12   16.68    7.07
2004 121  1.618   1.63  111.70     -2.61  274.37   35.82
2004 181  1.658   1.85  138.72     -4.59  170.30   62.81
2004 241  1.664   1.67  164.98     -5.56   65.57   89.14
2004 301  1.635   1.14  191.61     -5.37  321.25  115.89
2004 361  1.576   0.32  219.75     -3.94  218.39  144.09
2005  55   1.500  -0.65  250.44    -1.33  117.96  174.72
2005 115  1.428  -1.51  284.44      1.96   20.74  208.57
2005 175  1.385  -1.85  321.39      4.74  286.58  245.47
2005 235  1.391  -1.43  359.36      5.61  193.61  283.57
2005 295  1.442  -0.45   35.75       4.21   99.06  320.08
2005 355  1.517   0.61    68.99      1.47     1.18  353.27

#2324 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-23 11:28:13

Here are the coordinates the [http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/space/helios … 0054659957]website gave for earth:

planet = 07
resolution = 30
start_year = 2004
start_day = 1
stop_year = 2005
stop_day = 1
EARTH coordinates:

YYYY DDD   AU     ELAT   ELON     HLAT   HLON   HILON

2004    1   0.983   0.00   99.89   -2.94  164.57   23.89
2004  31   0.985   0.00  130.43   -5.90  129.53   54.39
2004  61   0.991   0.00  160.73   -7.21   94.48   84.87
2004  91   0.999   0.00  190.61   -6.57   59.04  114.95
2004 121  1.007   0.00  219.98   -4.23   22.92  144.37
2004 151  1.014   0.00  248.92   -0.87  346.16  173.14
2004 181  1.017   0.00  277.58    2.68  309.08  201.60
2004 211  1.015   0.00  306.21    5.57  272.11  230.15
2004 241  1.010   0.00  335.02    7.11  235.53  259.10
2004 271  1.002   0.00     4.21    6.87  199.41  288.52
2004 301  0.994   0.00   33.90    4.83  163.65  318.29
2004 331  0.987   0.00   64.06    1.47  128.14  348.31
2004 361  0.983   0.00   94.54   -2.32   92.86   18.5

#2325 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Orbital mechanics » 2004-03-23 09:25:54

I thought I’d post some relevant links:

[http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/space/helios … 0054659957](1) At this link you can give the time and date and it will calculate the position of any planet.


[http://www.marsacademy.com/traj.htm](2) The mars academy gives some equations to help calculate delta v’s and travel times.
Unfortunately they do not derive anything.



[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_travel](3) I thought this site was interesting. It is a free online encyclopedia.
It talks a little bit about with new computational power how some of the old
orbital transfer solutions have been reevaluated

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB