You are not logged in.
I think the FCC or what ever its called whent to far.
As far as balloons go, I believe there was a proposal for a stratosphere station once. I am not sure how much this helps someone get into space. As for rotating sling, what should it rotate around? Barings? Personally, as far as cheep alternatives to space elevators go, I like the idea of firing pulsed electromagnetic radiation at a parabolic dish, which causes the gas in the focus of the parabola to explode (A.K.A Laser Propulsion). Usually these types of vehicles are shaped like a discus for aerodynamics and spin for stability.
Still, all said I'd like to see the callculations.
Near as I can tell, there is no such thing as a zero energy orbit between planets, only between lagrange points in the same system (in our case, the Earth/sun/moon system). But That's neither here nor there.
What are the useful orbits? I think I recall seeing an orbit that some commits take from Juperter L1 to L4 to L5 back to L1. So if we took a similar trajectory from mars, would we come anywhere near earth? And if we did how fast would we be going, what direction would we be going by earth at and how might the gravity of earth affect these Martian orbits?
Why have a cycler "spaceship" - - build your L5 style cities in free return orbits, every time you pass by Earth or Mars add a few new buildings.
Choose a free return orbit and over the centuries perhaps hundreds of thousands of people could come to live in this travelling city.
Cool
When I say bigger, I mean with some kind of engine, probably an ion engine and maybe a small greenhouse. In other words, it wouldn't need to be serviced as much and we wouldn’t ever need to deorbit it because it could bring itself up to a safe parking orbit anytime we want..
I don't know how much alumnium one should thorough away. How may ubundent sorces of it are there? What precentage comes from the amazon rain forst?
The ISS, however, is big enough to cost too much and too small to actually get anything done.
I think that about summs it up
Evolution goes toward the best local maximal solution, not the best global solution.
Maybe not totally related but in optimization (e.g. neural networks) evolutionary algorithms are used because they tend not to get trapped in local minimums as easy algorithms based on gradient decent (e.g. back propagation). The distribution of the mutation, (i.e. do we expect mutations to be close to the parent or far from the parent), can be tuned to optimize the algorithm for local searching or global searching. If the algorithm is optimized for local searching it may find the local minimums very quickly but it may take a long time to find the global minimum. Perhaps it will take longer then the age of the universe.
Good point Cindy.
It's too bad I don't know what Kerry's space policy is.
Oh, well I am not a US citizen. So I have no vote. I wonder If I could register in Florida?
Of course not. But do you come here to best ustalize your time anyway?
Ahhh, call some quanity mass-energy and be done with it. It could be measured in Joles, killograms or some other quantity.
You're right. That would make a great movie.
The big flush?
Not to digress too much, but I am just happy to see plans in motion, whether they are SDV, EELV, moon or mars.
This must be the program [http://pari.math.u-bordeaux.fr/]PARI you are talking about.
Nuclear electric has its advantages too? Right? More power? I think solar electric tugs will be developed by the private sector. I am sure both will be useful.
Interesting thought, look at water. We don't see trillions of molecules but rather a fluid. It hes density surface tension temperature etc.
I glad to see I am not posting in a vacuum. This discussion isn’t really related to my posts, on orbital mechanics. I just thought I would see who was interested in computer algebra systems here, since I was doing some reading on it recently. It also gives me a place to store some good links for future reference.
However, If someone learns these systems well enough, it could save some work in the derivation of various formulas. It also allows a person to check there work. More relevant to my posts on orbital mechanics is the software package MATLAB. MATLAB is primarily used for numeric computations. However, it does come with a symbolic package that uses the MAPLE kernel. For anyone who can’t afford MATLAB there is a freeware clone called [http://ta.twi.tudelft.nl/nw/users/vuik/ … lones.html]octave. Any code I write for MATLAB I will try to make sure it runs on octave as well.
This site seems to have a math arcive of usenet posts:
[http://mathforum.org/epigone/sci.math.s … 2003-08-31]http://mathforum.org/epigone....3-08-31
Does any one here know much about computer algebra packages?
I keep reading the acronym EELV and for some reason I often thought Earth elevation vehicle. I wonder why I would have thought that. Anyway after reading the posts I realized the discussion was about a particular system, so I did a google search:
[http://www.af.mil/lib/afissues/1997/app_b_20.html]http://www.af.mil/lib/afissues/1997/app_b_20.html
(Evolved expendable launch vehicle) My mistake. I wonder if anyone else has made this mistake. Probably not.
His doesn't even have the Newtonian phsics right!