New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by atitarev

#126 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Venus - methods anyone? » 2004-05-05 17:03:47

...I think certain plants would just go into a 4 month growth spurt during the day and go into winter mode at night....

I am just commenting on the length of the Venusian day again. The solar day is not 4 months long but less than 2 (58 days), so is the night. (See my post with a link in this topic from 15 April) The diurnal period on Venus is almost half of its rotational day due to the direction of its rotation. It's an important point about Venus because it makes it somewhat easier to survive for plants and animals.

Otherwise, a great post, Kippy. smile

I read there are some plants and animals that can survive in 90C (in water). Don't remember what they are. They would be perfect pioneers on a terraformed Venus.

#127 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Venus - methods anyone? » 2004-05-02 04:49:40

When glucose mixes with Sulfuric Acid you get 6 Carbon atoms and 6 H2O Molecules.

H2SO4 + C6H12O6 -> 6C + 6H2O &  H2SO4

Water of course is necessary, and the Carbon would be used to construct a "ring-around-the-world" that is 36,785,450,405,345,177.90 kilometers in circumference.

The ring would slowly speed up Venus's orbit.

You could pump up CO2 to Cargo Ships which could hold(I'm guessing) .5 bars at a time making 235 day voyages to Mars, Callisto, and back using VASMIR engines.

So I'd say a healthy 122.33 year minimum using one cargo ship.

After that we'd be down to about 4 Bars of CO2, Nitrogen, & Water and Sulfuric Acid.

Scoop away the Sulfuric Acids to whatever and whererver they're needed for, reduce the atmosphere down to 391 mb CO2,  809 bars of nitrogen, You have your water, thus you can add your plants.

Good work, Eternal! smile

I think the pressure on Venus doesn't have to be as low as on Earth - from 2 to 4 or 5 bars might be OK (?) but the percentage of CO2 when the terraformation is complete should be lower.

There is no limit in how many cargo ships could go, so if the number of them and the capacity is higher, we could get rid of the excess atmosphere sooner.

I didn't get how the ring would work to speed up the rotation.

#128 Re: Unmanned probes » Results of Spirit and Opportunity - a quick question for my astronomy paper » 2004-04-29 20:11:30

I wonder if the rovers discovered any evidence of nitrogen in the soil. I couldn't find any information on that. That would be important for the future missions, colonizers, terraformers, wouldn't it?

#129 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Venus - methods anyone? » 2004-04-25 20:31:53

...Heavy handed but it would work, true that it would take milion years to cool, but in geo time it is short period...

In the same way you could say - let mother nature fix everything and we'll come when everything is ready. I don't want to wait a million years, I want it now smile
We should do something to see some progress in our lifetime, or at least hope to see some results or leave this pleasure to our children or grandchildren. Just getting rid of the excess soup of the atmosphere will cool Venus enough, so that people are able to stand on it - at least on the night side.

#130 Re: Terraformation » Animals on a terraformed Mars - what should we populate Mars with? » 2004-04-25 20:11:34

I guess animals should be introduced gradually, as the terraforming itself, which doesn't happen overnight. There won't be any whales, let alone large cattle on a "just" terraformed Mars. At the stage when we have just grass and no trees yet some insects, lizards and small mammals could be brought. They won't thrive at first because of the food scarcity, harsh climate, etc but they will help to create better soils and become food for more advanced animals when they can be brought there. The colonies will probably have some pets, fowls and some small sheep or cattle farms right from the start but there won't be large animals in the wild until there are enough forests, fresh water and both plant and animal food.

It is a good to have all the Earth animals on Mars for species conservation but I can't see it happening soon even if the basic terraformation had happened. The balance could be found even with a small number of species - hardy and small ones - easier to transport, find shelter for or move to a better place.

I would put such a dependency on the stages of terraforming to animal introduction:
1) low atmospheric pressure rich in CO2 (50 to 250 mb)-ice-lichens, moss, algae-bacteria ->
2) medium atmospheric pressure (250 to 500 mb)-some liquid water, clouds-grass - insects, lizards, mice, fish, crabs ->
3) higher atmospheric pressure (more Earthlike) (500+ mb)-open lakes, rivers, seas, (an) ocean(s)- bushes and trees -> birds, small mammals
...

It could also happen that large areas on Mars stay desert - the whole of Tharsis bulge, highlands in the southern hemisphere - about 30% or more of the total surface - areas 6 km or more above average level. Abundance of liquid water is crucial for animal life - it could be clean or dirty, fresh or salty but at least some part of it must be liquid at all times or reachable under the ice crust.

As for the transportation - if people are able to get to Mars, they'll find ways to get some small animals there too.

#131 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Venus - methods anyone? » 2004-04-15 21:52:07

Chat,

The hardest bit is to get rid of that atmosphere and to get the water in. Other guys have already discussed this.

I agree with you (from a previous post) that Venus could have much thicker atmosphere than Earth. Thick, mostly nitrogen atmosphere (with some oxygen) would soften the climate (thick atmospheres are good at that - like today's Venus). Water should be abundant (70% or more) and evenly spread (not hard on a relatively flat planet like Venus). Water clouds could protect from the heat of the long day and salty liquid water will keep temperatures warmer during the long night (at least for some time). I read that simulations showed  Venus would have an average of 25 degrees Celsius with the terran atmosphere. Polar and subpolar regions would be quite comfortable. Would be good to simulate weather programmatically knowing the diurnal period, albedo, the solar energy (1.9 of Earth's) and the different versions of atmosphere to find out what we could expect. If the results are promising, there would be much more people interested in terraforming Venus. If I knew the formula, I would write a program to find out what we can get on the terraformed Venus.

I would use the excess CO2 from Venus to give some airless or almost airless planets/moons some atmosphere - Mercury, the Moon,  Ganymede and Callisto. It could be shipped with huge shuttles (hollowed out asteroids ?). The Moon could use about a bar of CO2. We could use parachutes and airplanes on the Moon! It would be a foundation for terraforming them. The low gravity planets would lose some atmosphere gradually but it could be topped up - plenty of volatiles in the solar system. Maybe Mars could use some of CO2 from Venus too.

#132 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Venus - methods anyone? » 2004-04-15 16:59:41

atitarev,

It makes for a long work day, but real nice weekends smile

Making the planet turn faster is something that could be done in a few ways.

All the ideas I've seen would takes ages though.
Probably none of them were realistic other than speeding it up with asteroid collisions.
The price for doing that though is a devastated planet for many eons.

Let the earthlings have that tiny 24 hr day, we Venetians love our weekend parties. smile

Seriously, I don't think that this what's going to happen. The planets are too big for shifting and spinning up. We'll have to work with what we've got.

The main problem with Venus is not the rotation but its thick poisonous atmosphere. If the Venusian atmosphere could be made earthlike, then life could be adjusted somehow to long days and nights or people will have to live in domes or caves forever. Large amounts of water, clouds and winds would soften largely the temperature differences.

#133 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Venus - methods anyone? » 2004-04-14 17:46:30

... So far, the biggest problem is the 243 Terran day rotation, but we could fix that.

FYI, Venusian "light day" is much shorter than its rotational day. That is, it takes 243 days to rotate around its own axis but its mean solar day is 116.74 Earth days - 58 days of light and 58 days of darkness. It is still a lot but much shorter than many people think. Maybe with the right atmosphere and climate on Venus the rotational period could be left alone, if it becomes too difficult to change.

One of the sources:
[http://www.ursa.fi/~mpi/astro/venus.html]Venus data

#134 Re: Human missions » Russians to Mars by 2011? - I seriously doubt it. » 2004-04-13 00:48:27

Robert Zubrin in his "Case for Mars" said that Americans could buy all the technology for 4 billion dollars from Russians to get a Mars mission and the book was written in the nineties. It's just a matter of cooperation. I don't think the French will pay for the mission. The US could afford this but they prefer to do it themselves and pay 30 billions and spend 30 years.

#135 Re: Terraformation » Terraforming Mercury - Is anyone this crazy? » 2004-04-07 18:25:58

Maybe in a billion years, if the humanity still lives, someone will consider seriously shifting planets further from the Sun to protect the planets and lives from the expanding Sun. By that time, they should be able not only to that but also spin up planets.

I read articles about shifting and spinning up planets. Don't kaugh! It may sound crazy but it's one of the ways to go. I remember someone argued that planets are good where they are and they should be spread apart. Mercury is just too close to the Sun. If it were possible to shift Mercury to the distance of 85-90 mln km from the Sun (Venus is at 108 mln km, Earth at 150) (sorry I am used to km, not miles) and spin it up, Mercury might get a hot but tolerable climate to support life. The method for shifting planets was not too clear to me, something to do with solar winds.

Another method would paraterraforming - living in domes or underground using the cheap energy source

#136 Re: Not So Free Chat » How many non-Americans on this forum - Don't read this, OK! » 2004-02-29 23:34:12

Feeling is likewise, Anatoli, but... It was a general welcome, you asked us to describe New Mars, to make some kind of an 'advertisement,' so I tried...

But of course it is aimed towards you, too, good to see somebody with a background like yours on this board!

'Bout the "Dutch" confusion: Officialy we speak Dutch ('Nederlands' in Dutch) but we're officially the Flemish people, from Flanders, the Dutch speaking part of Belgium. So unofficially our language is Flemish (Vlaams) same thing, minor differences, history etc... And *very* confusing for people outside The Netherlands/Belgium/Flanders...

Oh, I didn't get that you were making a statement about New Mars, Rik. Thanks for that. I will add this to the ads I am making up.

I don't feel confused about languages used in Europe, it's pretty straightforward. I haven't been to Belgium but I was in different places in Germany and once in Holland.

As for the Asians languages, it's more complicated. I was envolved in a hot online discussions on a Japanese language forum where some people started abusing each other because of a mix-up about what we call a language and what we call a dialect, whether Japanese is close to Chinese as Italian to Spanish or not, and whether Cantonese is a dalect of Chinese or a separate language. That was funny because nobody was able to convince anyone and there was no moderator to stop the fight. big_smile

I'll keep trying but looks like interest to Mars and space exploration is dropping again in other forums, posts are more pessimistic. Maybe because nothing is happening and no short-term plan has been developed for the Mars mission.

P.S. You don't need to complain about your English in your siggie, Rik, you "sound" like native to me, although I am not the one to judge.

#137 Re: Not So Free Chat » How many non-Americans on this forum - Don't read this, OK! » 2004-02-28 15:23:51

Hi Rik,

I figured your country when I looked at your profile later, I thought you were from Holland because you referred to the Dutch language a few times in your posts. Sorry for the confusion.


And most important: We love to hear from you! (if you're interested in Mars, at least, though sometimes a 'dissident' could be good, too...)

Thank you! I am not upset with anyone, I am just kind of busy at the moment with other things but I do read the new posts and if I feel like adding something, I do. I find your posts very interesting.

#138 Re: Not So Free Chat » Foreign-Born Presidents? - ...(another can of worms?) » 2004-02-22 19:48:36

I understand very well what you fee like, Cindy. You know, in England they are planning to introduce the rule that if you want to get permanent residence in the UK, you should learn to play cricket among some other things. Yes, I agree a president should know a lot of things about their country and the daily problems people face in different areas but you admit that even a pure American candidate may not know enough about "everyday America". R. Reagan too was an actor but made it to the presidency, did he care about Iowa farmers? Not knowing the difference in the accents or not knowing how shrimps in Louisiana taste can be a source of embarrassment and reduce your chance to establish good communication and that's what makes an alien different from Americans but I would prefer a person who can listen to problems and solve them, rather than a chap who is "friends" with everyone, knows all the regional diversities but only thinks about more power and wealth. That's not a very important issue for me, anyway. I accept that you've got your reasons to want only native-borns to be eligible.

I must admit - I'm not as good in History as you think. I did well at school and at Uni in Russia, but focused too much on languages and, in the last years on computing - especially after arrival in Australia in 1997 - very time-consuming but no excuse not to learn other things. I haven't seen Hermitage or Winter palace either - what a shame! Of course I saw so many pictures, TV shows, etc, I feel like I've seen it. I stayed in St Petersburg only shortly on the way to Finland. A really beautiful city!

Great link, thanks!

#139 Re: Not So Free Chat » Foreign-Born Presidents? - ...(another can of worms?) » 2004-02-22 16:09:57

I'm not American and I am an immigrant in Australia, so you'll probably say my opinion is biased, Cindy. I just want to express my humble opinion.

For the same reason you guys, don't want an immigrant to be a president, many Americans don't want a woman or a black to be a president. And it's not different. I am not accusing you of discrimination, Cindy but that's what it sounds like. It is so common, though for every country that they allow only natives to be their presidents/prime ministers, etc. I just happen to be of a different opinion.

If I were American, I wouldn't vote for Arnold but for a different reason - I don't think he's mature for the job, it doesn't mean that he doesn't feel as American or he is not worried about his country (I'm sure he considers America as HIS country).

It is hard to tell person's patriotism and knowledge of a country based on how long they lived there but 20 years seems enough if it were the criterion.

...a foreign-born person might have just that many more conflicts of interest...REAL conflicts of interest, such as their native nation suddenly wanting to jump on the bandwagon with demands for preferential treatment and etc "just because" one of their own is now in the most powerful political position in the world (U.S. Presidency).

Besides, maybe America just needs a little bit of that - good relationships with other countries. Historically, it's not always the case that a foreigner in power tries to make more benefit for their country of origin. The Russian Empress - Catherine the II was German. Although, she spoke with some German accent - her command of Russian was perfect, she knew all the nuances of the language and the folklore and she forced the noblety to use more Russian, even banned the use  of too many foreign words (overkill!). Anyway, my point is - it's mainly the quality of the candidate that should be used for deciding who should be elected.

#140 Re: Not So Free Chat » Is Pluto a Planet? - You Be the Judge. » 2004-02-21 06:13:22

The Kuiper Belt and Oort Cloud objects have a lot of nitrogen (frozen or gaseous), which could be a good source for terraforming Mars and other planets closer to the Sun. The delivery is an issue but the asteroids's trajectory could be directed towards Mars and then dumped on Mars in pieces.

Knowing the region is important for understanding the origin of the solar system and for the planetary engineers (terraformers), as the scientists say, the bombardment of all the planets with asteroids and comets was probably coming from the Oort cloud and Kuiper Belt and that's possibly where Earth got its atmosphere from.

#141 Re: Human missions » Russia can send Man to Mars by 2014:official - at one-tenth the NASA budget » 2004-02-21 05:56:36

Very interesting Rik, thank you. I must have impressed you really, if you remember well what you saw when you were 12... smile

#142 Re: Human missions » Russia can send Man to Mars by 2014:official - at one-tenth the NASA budget » 2004-02-19 16:46:27

I agree, Rik. The Russian economy is growing again, not as fast as Chinese, though. The Russian Space Agency (Rosaviakosmos) has the capacity for a Martian mission now, if they have the money to build these spacecrafts. What is required is a lander, more tests, more fuel, etc. Do you think that Zarya could be used for a Martian mission? I don't know if the craft would be able to take a lander and enough equipment.
If they cooperated with NASA or another space agency, they would be able to pull it off, don't you think?
The real boom for the space industry may start, when there is a demand for Russian spacecrafts and launchers.

#143 Re: Not So Free Chat » Is Pluto a Planet? - You Be the Judge. » 2004-02-19 16:34:50

You should have created an entirely new thread for it, in my opinion.

I'll think about it, Cindy.

#144 Re: Human missions » Russia can send Man to Mars by 2014:official - at one-tenth the NASA budget » 2004-02-19 06:02:58

It is a disappointment for me, though, Rik. The efforts could be used for a Mars mission. I hope they may change their mind after elections in the US. I read that they are ready for cooperation with the US in Mars exploration but there was quote "no invitation" to cooperation.

#145 Re: Human missions » Russia can send Man to Mars by 2014:official - at one-tenth the NASA budget » 2004-02-18 18:26:59

Sorry to disappoint you guys. The new spacecraft Zarya ("dawn") is meant only for LEO, not for Martian or even Lunar exploration, unless they change their minds. That's what Yuri Koptev, Director-General of Rosaviakosmos explicitly said. Source - Russian language media.

#146 Re: Not So Free Chat » Is Pluto a Planet? - You Be the Judge. » 2004-02-17 16:13:21

I think all the solid bodies in the solar system large enough to hold a colony with the gravity enough to stop people from flying away into space could be colonized (I don't mean terraformed!). To keep settlements warm, a lot of nuclear power could be used. Pluto has resources to support a colony. If the moons of the outer planets are colonized then we will have good technology to produce and save energy.

Honestly I don't care what you call it, we can still call it a planet as a tradition. As for terraforming, if the temperatures are kept just below the freezing point, the water will sublime but not as fast as the liquid water. I don't think Pluto is of big interest for colonizers but who knows, maybe some day...

Take a look at Arctic worlds of Ganymede/Callisto (imagination), that's the approach I would take for any "cold" planet or moon in the Solar system:
[http://www.geocities.com/ares2101/Jovia … rming.html]Jovian Terraforming

#147 Re: Terraformation » Should we colonize Europa and Ganamedie! - Nice place to live » 2004-02-15 15:34:03

If we go to the Jovian moons I would start with Callisto, then Ganymede. Europa has much higher and dangerous levels of radiation for colonization.

#148 Re: Not So Free Chat » How many non-Americans on this forum - Don't read this, OK! » 2004-02-12 23:29:12

Just want to share on my "work" promoting New Mars internationally. There are quite active discussions in some places but they are much smaller in number of users and posts.

Apart from joining discussions on Russian forums, I started posting in a German:
[http://www.nachtwelten.de/vB/showthread … genumber=2]Mars macht mobil...

If you're wanna laugh at my French posting,
click on [http://forums.futura-sciences.com/viewt … 4&start=20]A la Conquete de Mars

I'll take it easy, if something comes up, I'll look for Japanese forums.

It depends on discussions going on in a particular forum but can someone suggest a good statement/description about the New Mars Forum?

#149 Re: Not So Free Chat » How many non-Americans on this forum - Don't read this, OK! » 2004-02-12 06:28:48

Hi Shaun,

Thank you for your nice message. Greeting you from Melbourne. Haven't been up in Queensland yet but planning to.

Yes, Australia is great. I never regretted coming here.

It's getting late now, talk to you later.

#150 Re: Not So Free Chat » How many non-Americans on this forum - Don't read this, OK! » 2004-02-12 02:07:27

I'm glad I hooked some serious pessimists on a couple of other forums into a discussions. Not sure whether they join the discussion here but the word is spreading. big_smile

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by atitarev

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB