New Mars Forums

Official discussion forum of The Mars Society and MarsNews.com

You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.

#101 Re: Space Policy » Primary space politics » 2008-04-07 07:41:03

Obama’s modest proposal - 7 Apr 2008

If elected President, Senator Barack Obama plans to delay Project Constellation for at least five years, putting the saved money into a new $18-billion-a-year education program that would, in essence, nationalize early-education for children under five years old to prepare them for the rigors of kindergarten and beyond.

Why single out the space budget to cut for this program? “NASA is no longer associated with inspiration,” Obama told a campaign rally audience in March. The silence from space advocacy groups in response to this policy, made public in November, has been deafening.

If NASA is no longer associated with inspiration, perhaps Mr Obama can tell who is?

Obama is. He going to bring CHANGE!

Think about it.... CHANGE!

roll

#102 Re: Not So Free Chat » Has Multiculturalism Failed ? » 2008-04-05 21:42:01

Gregori, you forgot Heterosexual. And Christian. Remember, it's Heterosexual White Christian Males who control the planet and oppress everyone else. It's really amazing how such a small group control such a large planet.

Its more amazing how such small mind sets arise from economic and social class. I guess, in my experience its almost predictable who's saying something from what is being said.

Now there is something we can agree on.  wink

#103 Re: Not So Free Chat » Has Multiculturalism Failed ? » 2008-04-04 15:22:22

Multiculturalism hasn't failed, it just hasn't been implemented properly.

For a multicultural society groups have to learn to compromise, but although most do compromise by accepting each others some dont, for example i find frustrating that some (not all) Muslims think multiculturalism is us obeying their rules other wise its discriminating them (eg: don't drink, don't wear short dresses, etc) and they don't believe anti discrimination works both ways and demand respect but don't give it themselves to all other cultures that deviate from the Islamic ideal and shun those cultures (by country or religion) or sexual orientation.

It just has to be understood by all parties involved that respect is both and all ways no matter how immoral you think they are and express no discrimination, and sometimes just to downplay somethings others find uncomfortable and try to experience the other cultures themselves (both ways).

Yeah, the question is, why do we tolerate that kind of intolerant behavior?

But you dont fight fire with fire.

there are more ways of managing that than being antagonistic.

Really?

Osama releases his latest album insulting the West, and the West yawns.

Some Danish cartoonists release a cartoon implying Muslims use Islam as an excuse for violence, and Muslims respond with violence.

We have no moral or legal responsibility to tolerate such nonsense.

#104 Re: Not So Free Chat » Has Multiculturalism Failed ? » 2008-04-04 14:26:45

Multiculturalism hasn't failed, it just hasn't been implemented properly.

For a multicultural society groups have to learn to compromise, but although most do compromise by accepting each others some dont, for example i find frustrating that some (not all) Muslims think multiculturalism is us obeying their rules other wise its discriminating them (eg: don't drink, don't wear short dresses, etc) and they don't believe anti discrimination works both ways and demand respect but don't give it themselves to all other cultures that deviate from the Islamic ideal and shun those cultures (by country or religion) or sexual orientation.

It just has to be understood by all parties involved that respect is both and all ways no matter how immoral you think they are and express no discrimination, and sometimes just to downplay somethings others find uncomfortable and try to experience the other cultures themselves (both ways).

Yeah, the question is, why do we tolerate that kind of intolerant behavior?

#105 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Ares I (CLV) - status » 2008-04-04 12:40:36

I wonder who Congress is listening to when they write up these reports.

#106 Re: Not So Free Chat » Has Multiculturalism Failed ? » 2008-04-04 12:37:25

can we rename the thread middle class white male paranoia?

No, but we can rename it Humanities Suicidal Death Spiral if you would prefer.

#107 Re: Not So Free Chat » Katrina and New Orleans » 2008-04-04 09:22:09

The vast majority of the "victims" of the burst levees were "victims" long before the storm hit.

#108 Re: Human missions » Would you like to live on Mars? - Tell me what you think? » 2008-04-03 17:10:08

I for one eagerly await the day I can travel to and from Earth and Mars, and a few other places within the inner solar system at will as a private citizen.

#109 Re: Human missions » Design Reference Mission 5.0 » 2008-04-03 16:25:39

Would it? I'm not so sure. There will be 10,000kg tension on this cable after all. Your thrust is only going to be a tiny fraction of that. And even if it does oscillate, how do you know it can't be controlled with micro-adjustments? Has this ever been tested?

Gemini 11 toyed with a tether attached to a Agena target vehicle.

Gemini_11_Agena.jpg

#110 Re: Human missions » Design Reference Mission 5.0 » 2008-04-03 13:20:50

Elastic items teld to lose elasticity after a while.

#111 Re: Human missions » Space stations beyond ISS » 2008-04-01 22:00:34

Both the second stage of Ares I and the Ares V EDS is based on the S-IVB Saturn upper stage, the same hull used for Skylab. The concept is the same, only the product is larger. So both of those are open for business.

The ET, or now, the core stage, is trickier, but very worth the effort. The Ares V EDS goes to orbit and beyond without isolation, so its quite likely the ET could as well. The biggest problem is likely to be access, but we know the tank has hatches to do internal repairs, its just a matter of enlarging them and placing them in a good spot, without adding a whole lot of mass.

The trouble has always been the shuttle. It had far to little margin to play with to make the required modifications to the tank to make it work. And frankly we didn't have anyplace to put them, and anything to do with them once we got them there.

Its a new ballgame now. We need the volume. We have the margin. If the tank is the spacecrafts hull, nothing we are likely to want to put in it will seriously challenge the Ares V lifting power, even with modification.

#112 Re: Human missions » Space stations beyond ISS » 2008-03-31 22:12:15

The most practical way we currently have to build large simulated gravity spacecraft or stations is to string several Shuttle/Ares tanks and spent stages together. This would provide lots of volume with minimal extra structural mass.

I think that is the most effective way to go for the Moon, Mars, and beyond, on the surface and in space. Even the humble Ares I contains a second stage  with dimensions ranging near 18' x 100', with an internal volume that dwarfs the ISS. The Ares V EDS stage could do better. Then theres the big enchilada, the ET itself. Think about that. An ISS sized station or larger for tiny fraction of the cost and time.

Theres challenges of course. Devising an outer coated to shield the hull from wide temperature swings while isolating the fuel it contains, deposing of or exploiting the J2X, and engineering an interstage segment that allows access for personnel and bulky cargo to the interior to the H2 and LOX tanks and connecting to other spent stages without compromising either. And figuring out how to get them to through atmospheres and safely on a surface. Nows the time to flesh it out more, before we get stuck.

I'd like to see NASA fling a ET into orbit before we retire the shuttle, just to see how it holds up out of the box.

#113 Re: Human missions » Long duration Human space missions - Can we survive them? » 2008-03-31 07:29:39

I think once on the Martian surface, its going to take a lot longer than a few days for bone and muscle mass to recover, and even after that there going to have to be careful.

#114 Re: Human missions » Lunar gardens of remembrance » 2008-03-30 22:41:52

We should spread the remains of Arthur C Clark on Europa.  wink

#115 Re: Human missions » Long duration Human space missions - Can we survive them? » 2008-03-30 22:08:06

While rotation surely adds a certain amount of mechanical complexity, its also the only way to get people in a useful quantity to Mars, or the surface of any other body on the other side of interplanetary space in any condition to do anything productive.

We can go one of two ways initially. One is to do a really small ship and crew living off MREs with a big, powerful, probably nuclear rocket, resulting in a transit of a couple months max and putting much more surface equipment on a separate ship with much assembly required. Or preferably, in my opinion, we can build a much larger craft, incorporating the full range of techniques to produce as Earth-like environment as possible, capable functioning indefinably in interplanetary space conditions with a large crew. The latter, while more expensive at first, it can be parked in Mars orbit, allowing the far cheaper shuttles to do follow up flights, because crews have some place to rehabilitate.

#116 Re: Terraformation » Does it really matters? » 2008-03-27 23:24:37

When discussing human colonization, and ultimately terraforming, I think that on Mars you have to approach it from the exact opposite direction as on Earth. Here, when humans arrived in a new area they had an overabundance or resources, and were only limited by man power. You could make a small investment and the colony would, more or less, take care of itself. On Mars you have to have everything in place first. You can't send a hundred people without sending either all their habs with them, or having someone/thing there building it already.

This will always be the case. So by the time you have enough people to consider terraforming, they literally won't need it. What would they need all that empty space for? The biggest use we have is agriculture, and they will have already developed all new methods for a much smaller footprint. Google the Vertical Farm sometime.

The only real use would be to create a giant Earth park for a new home for any of Earths wildlife that can adapt, and any we can create. A noble goal, but far from a question of survival. And such a pattern will be repeated just about anywhere that isn't Earthlike.

#117 Re: Not So Free Chat » The Flag that Barack Obama won't wear » 2008-03-27 19:55:01

::Edit::  What particularly troubles me about the Obama situation is a lot of Americans don't seem to care that he was/is affiliated with an anti-American church for 20 years.  Hello??

I really do not understand this.  Is it self-loathing/hatred as a result of the ongoing Iraq War?

Half the democrats hate him already cause he's not Billary, at least half the electorate hates him because he thinks he's a "progressive", there isn't a whole lot of people out there who really expected better from him who arn't drinking his kool-aid. If this came to light after the election, it'd be a different story.

And yes, his political supporters, despite possibly cringing at the thought that their messiah to be is affiliated with a "Jesus freak", never the less agree with this particular "Jesus freak" on the issues in question.

I'm just waiting for someone, anyone, to suggest that a sermon with this kind of material may cross the line for tax exempt status. Cause you can be sure If it was a GOP candidate, the liberals would be looking cash.

#118 Re: Unmanned probes » Cassini-Huygens - NASA/ESA Saturn orbiter & Titan lander » 2008-03-27 09:27:59

If this was radioactive material, what would cause it to be distributed in this sort of... pattern?

#119 Re: Not So Free Chat » The Flag that Barack Obama won't wear » 2008-03-21 07:55:54

The war in Iraq is over, don't you remember when the president landed on the air-craft carrier under the big sign that read 'Mission Accomplished.' What we have now is the occupation of Iraq. How exactly this is fighting the terrorist is a bit hard to tell. Though this is probably off topic.

What we have is a large peacekeeping mission at the invite of the elected government. Not at all unlike the dozens  of operations in the Balkins in the 90's. For some reason, those operations were never called occupations. 

Osama bin Laden has also said that the Invasion of Iraq helped fulfill his goals.  I question the wisdom of taking policy advice from terrorists.

In any case while rational people may disagree about the best choice of US policy, I don't believe this is a question of patriotism.  To seek to change US policy is not unpatrotic.

What it did do do is force Osama to engage us in Iraq to try to foil our efforts, because our ultimate successes would be a blow to his ideology. If you really think the Osama wouldn't try to do what says he would, please say so.

Again, what is one to conclude if the policies he stands for are blatantly harmful?

Hussein's regime was very successful in keeping terrorists out.
We removed the regime, so the terrorists moved in.

Terrorist don't like competition. Unless they worked for him. Despite not being the Sunni Koran thumper the Osama would liked, he still persecuted the Shiite majority. Ultimately its a different edge to the same sword.

#120 Re: Not So Free Chat » The Flag that Barack Obama won't wear » 2008-03-20 22:00:26

Obama doesn't wear a pin because he wishes to differentiate himself from those who do, who support the war on Islamic fascism, particularly the war in Iraq. Thats fine.

People only question his patriotism when they take a good hard look at the policies he's suggesting, and our enemies say that his policies help them reach their goals.

#121 Re: Human missions » Design Reference Mission 5.0 » 2008-03-20 13:58:25

Who wants to be the one to go to Congress with the tether idea?

You'll be about as popular as Rumsfield.

Why? Considering it would make the spacecraft much, much, smaller and cheaper while at the same time aleviating the risk of medical problems from zero-G on the long mission to Mars; why would it be unpopular?

Making a multi-billion $ mission and several lives contingent on spinning billions of dollars worth of hardware on a string will not pass the BS test of those unfamiliar with the physics (ie: legislators).

Though having said that, the best reason for opposing a tether, aside from being unable to aerobrake, or dock with anything, or perform mid course corrections, or having it work on the way home, is it completely misses the point of manned interplanetary flight, which is simulate Earth-like ecosystems and to reproduce them at your destinations. Interplanetary space itself is a destination. Using a tether so you can cram a crew in a tin can to eat MRE's for 6 months doesn't do that.

#122 Re: Not So Free Chat » The Flag that Barack Obama won't wear » 2008-03-20 10:32:58

Here's the source material in a format we can all enjoy.

Look, I know Obama has devoted following of people who think he belches puppies and sunshine, but there is nothing in there except excuses and the same tired old liberal class warfare rhetoric that even makes this an issue in the first place.

Religion is suppose to be the search for eternal truth that applies equally to everyone, and if Obama says he routinely disagrees with Wright on the tactical, political applications of Christian principles, something tells me he's not there for the theology, but for the weekly socio-economic pep rally, or perhaps more accurately, two minute hate. Mrs. Obamas statements would seem to confirm this.

The fact Obama is so quick to jettison race in a race speech in favor of class should tell you that race is not the controlling social factor. That black people had the misfortune of receiving all their civil rights at the same time as liberals were putting everyone on welfare only proves that blacks are just as much, and by the numbers disproportionately more, the victims of those policies as anyone else who was poor at the time.

To Mr. Wrights credit, he at least has a clue that blacks and the poor in general have not gotten what they have been promised by their favorite political party. They however have gotten all they the democrats can and ever will deliver, as neither the country nor the party afford what they promise, cause neither would exist if they really tried. This is were Mr. Wright loses it, and with Obama still spouting the same failed policies, he is apparently incapable of any better.

Whether or not Obama can personally separate class as race remains to be seen, but his wife clearly can not. His policies do not. And that is what makes him unsuitable for public office.

#123 Re: Human missions » Design Reference Mission 5.0 » 2008-03-20 08:44:03

Who wants to be the one to go to Congress with the tether idea?

You'll be about as popular as Rumsfield.

#124 Re: Single Stage To Orbit » SSTO » 2008-03-19 22:37:03

Ehhh, VentureStar was pushing the practical mass envelope even if it did work as advertised, meaning the thing would have been bloody expensive and finicky like Shuttle probably.

And besides, we don't really need lots of light-to-medium lift right now, heavy lift is what we need to get to Mars.

Finally with the launch market as bad as it is these days, such a vehicle would probably be a commercial failure.

Even it it didn't deliver the mass to orbit promised (20tons), it would still be suitable for moving larger crews(more than 6) to LEO, and once Lunar LOX production gets going, providing the far lighter LH2 to a fuel depot.

The real question is whether it can do the rate of launch intended. It's worth the effort to find out.

#125 Re: Not So Free Chat » The Flag that Barack Obama won't wear » 2008-03-19 22:12:31

What you've done here is called "guilty by association." You've assumed several things about Obama based on the views of a long-time friend of his. He actually addressed this yesterday in a very good speech about race relations, but I'm sure you'll dismiss it as "pandering." If you're going to have that kind of extremely cynical mind-set in regards to Obama, claiming that you can't believe anything he says because he's "power-hungry," then the only fair thing to do would be to apply that same cynicism to every candidate. And if you do that, then there's really no point in participating in the Democratic process because then there’s no reason for you to believe anything any politician says ever. So why even bother voting?

We are not assigning guilt by association. Obama's own actions do this for him. Unless your willing to believe that Mr. Wright ONLY used that kind racist rhetoric on Sundays when Obama wasn't there, and such an uncanny coincidence persisted for the 20 years Obama claims to have been a member.

Hillary has a term for this. It's called the willful suspension of disbelief.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB