You are not logged in.
Could Titans thicker atmosphere have any consequences for Huygens probe landing on the moon? ???
Well done Cassioli....actually i can make out another crater right in front looking towards the hills in this 3d photo,i hadnt seen before when looking at the same pic in 2d!!Hope to see more of these 3d pics as the rover makes its way toward the hills.
Correct me if i'm wrong but methane on Titan seems to be attributed to photochemical origin in the atmosphere!In view of the find of methane on Mars and this seems to be attributed to geologic activity and/or microbial life..does this have new implications as to the origin of Methane on Titan?Any thoughts about this? ???
Anyone heard about rumours coming from Mars express team regarding finding traces of mineral salts allover martian surface? ???
Hey dude no life on mars..........watch your mouth.....there might not have been any romans on Mars,but surely they have given it its name..and take my word for it!!!
According to Nasa,Mazaztal is a basaltic rock like most rocks examined at the gusev site.Prolly the green colour is olivine!Like in the case of Humphrey,there seems to be evidence of alteration of the rock with passage of minute quantities of water.Some kind of mineral salts could be traced in the fracture line inside this rock which is clearly visible in the MI image.The presence of olivine excludes this rock to have been formed in a watery environment as in the case at Meridiani.The water interaction with the rock must have taken place after its formation,otherwise the olivine would have been altered.What i'm really puzzled about is the fact that ,theres this one rock at Meridiani:Bounce..cant explain how it got there and its place inside the story of Meridiani site!Is it possible that the minerals found along the fracture line inside Mazaztal at Gusev be attributed to microbial activity combined with ground water seepage thru the rock or just water acting alone?!!
Those Columbia hills seem to be navigable!
So i take it that Mars Express subsurface radar imaging wont be able to differentiate between underground water from hydrocarbon deposits.Is that right?Correct me if i'm wrong,i believe the radar is capable of penetrating 4 km underground..so any oil deposits should also be detected except we wont know for sure its composition.Congratulations to John ,,interesting work u've done there!
i would be grateful if u found that pic for me..thanks
atajurk, Can you please identify the site from where u're getting these pics coz i havent seen them on any of the Nasa/JPL sites?
Were they pics of dust devils or sand dunes?Cant remember.But i believe the dunes are not for certain they are made up of dust we normally see in the lava plains below where the air is sufficient to allow for dust transfer.Am i right or wrong?
SBird, Episodic geological activity on Mars has already been manifested by the fresh looking gullies we see in a few craters in mid southern latitudes ( that could also explain the distribution of methane along equatorial regions!)Strangely enough,methane has never been discussed in relation to these martian phenomena.Now whether volcanic activity on a larger scale is occurring is still to be seen.I guess this finding opens up a number of tantalizing possibilities,and yes..one of these is whether life has a part in it. MY opinion,i dare say ,it makes more sense that life which might exist underground or lies dormant on martian surface..subsurface comes to life along with geological activity. Some scientists explain the ancient huge water channel flows we see today on the surface by such EPISODIC rather than continuos geological activity...some dare even say that this could happen again today if magma hits a huge subsurface water reservoir resulting in chaotic regions and huge water flows...remember that outgassing of volcanic gases raise pressures and temperatures temporarily to allow liquid water to exist on the surface.the question would be for how long will the water be able to exist in liquid form and hence determine the size of the water channel!The huge sizes of ancient flows of course fits pretty well if we assime that atmospheric pressures and temperatures were higher in earlier martian history compared to the present day on Mars.
Billwhite, AGREED... I believe consensus has been reached!
I'll have to agree with lunarmark regarding the possibilities existing for the origin of methane.Prior to the finding of methane on Mars,scientists were not excluding that the planet might still be geologically active.Orbital pics of lava flows on Mars seem to corroborate this since some flows are free of craters indicating a young age...i believe the ones indicated to demonstrate this were the elysium flows.The argument for failing to see any present activity on the surface is that the last eruptions may have occurred few millions to thousands of years ago and hence some volcanoes may just be dormant rather then extinct,Its a matter of time until the next volcano comes to life!The finding of methane could push that latest geological activity to more recent history thou..to hundreds of years..still Mars as agreed is geologically dead when compared to say Earth or Venus.
Dickbill,that was exactly what i meant in the first place.Since finding Life on Mars wont question WHO created it,then it will still leave space for the church to preach about God as THE CREATOR of everything!The significance of that could have different meaning in the sense that whereas before, God was seen as creator of earth and life here,now GOd will be creator of the Universe including any alien species that might exist! Ofcourse it would be much easier to accomodate whats written in the book of GENESIS to the new truth about life in the universe then having to interpret all the details in the life of Jesus of Nazareth. :;):
dont agree with that dickbill.We havent yet discussed who created the chemical reactions for life..the laws of physics and chemistry in the universe that form the basis for reactions which have developed into what we see today..including possible life on Mars.
Cassioli,dark area i was referring to whole meridiani and other areas like acidalia....regarding UV and methane..yes prolly UV does decompose methane but in the mean time it should produce it as well..the net balance depends on whether more methane is destroyed or produced ..i guess..any thoughts!?
There is no evidence as yet or i dont recall myself of anything being mentioned of volcanoes being a source for methane on Titan except UV light interacting with Titans upper atmosphere.
Excuse my ignorance but is it not possible that Methane in Martian atmosphere could arise from photochemical reactions between carbon dioxide,water with incoming UV light?Same thing happens on a bigger scale in Titans atmosphere!
???
Cassioli,are you trying to suggest that some of those round objects or 'pebbles" could be spherules similar to the ones found at Meridiani?I guess the only way to confirm that is to show that some of these are made up of haematite or not but that would be difficult since individually they wont make up a strong signal as to give themselves up in moss spectra!
Thanks for that one Julius Caesar!!!
![]()
..erhaps you couldto .psay 'bout all this?! :;): find out for us what Herod hadBut seriously, the original question was the concern of religious perception or backlash with regard to finding life on Mars. The digressions come from an insistance to rationalize the compatibility of religion to scientific findings as a result of my focusing on a choice of words used by RG concerning the supposed 'faith of scientists' which I believe is a missapplication when used from within a religious context. This is a very simple, little, some think harmless, misrepresentation of the science community, as commonly refered to as... 'light hearted humour' is used to gloss over something that makes folks feel discomfort... after all, its annoying that a significant, factual detail should intrude on the comfy feelings of a feeling group of harmless, well-intentioned faithful. But this doesn't diminish, in my view anyway, the importance of it.
The innate tendency to ignore or brush off, or misinterpret, evidence and the methods used to obtain it by the religious because of the discomfort it creates within the 'spiritual' mind-set is palpable. The logical, rational part of that mind-set is forced to deal with actual results and forms of proof which counter the faith impulse to trust in traditional thought and ideas. "Don't question," they say,"Have faith in God! Jesus...(or whoever) will reveal the answers..."There a number of states in the U.S. that feel the teaching of evolution, or the teaching of it without creationism as a 'balance', is unfair. Apparently the two subjects are considered on equal par. Either 'could' equally be true. I find this disturbing, especially if the creationist agenda is taught as if it were true. If that's the case then remove biology, geology, chemistry...any and all the sciences and lets go back to a predominately religious education system. Hell, while were at it, why not dissolve the separation of church and state?
Hi Dickbill,
What about Occam's Razor? The simplist explanation?Maybe miracles are just that, manipulation of probability instead of forces. If you could control the entropic content of physical system without touching the temperature and volume of the system, that means you could control the probabilities associated with the description of that system. We don't know how to do that of course, but maybe Jesus Christ knew.
...or maybe they were metaphors used to comfort a superstitious population that desperately needed other-worldly comfort in a time which admittedly must have been torturous. Don't get me wrong, it's a great story, but it's just that - a great story. They didn't have special effects in those days, so miracles of fiction had to suffice.
Pheww!!.. Now, having said all that. This whole diatribe was intended only as a point I wanted to make with regard to RG's innocent enough comment and word usage. I apologize for rocking the boat here. I felt a need to express something and I did, that's what forums are for after all. It's still a free country where religion and science can live, at least with civility, if not in marriage.
If life is found on Mars, and its proven to be Martian in origin, things are gonna change... gradually, over time...
Thanks for your patience.
My answer to Marineris regarding what Herod said or acted at the time is clear from the Bible itself.The New Testament scripts also make it evident that politics played a big role to what happened to Jesus of Nazareth.I'm wondering what all this has to do with finding life on Mars but since you mentioned that i'll elaborate on the subject.It seems that King Herod was afraid that Jesus would be a future King of Jews since he was related to King David :according to the Bible thru Joseph ,,his father.Some other sources not from the Bible suggest Mary was related to King David thru many generations going back about a 1000 years previous to the time of Jesus!So Jesus seems to have been a rightful King by inheritance!Some sources even speculate that Mary was married to King Herod and had children..Herod wanted his elder son to become King and NOT Jesus who was the son from a second marriage of Mary.The latter is what could have been the history of the real Jesus of Nazareth we dont read about in the Bible!Ok it's still speculation coz none of this has been proven(suggest u read The Marian Conspiracy by Graham Phillips)
Still cant understand why dark areas exemplified by Meridiani are well preserved knowing that global dust storms occur on Mars! ??? would appreciate if someone could give me some feedback regarding this matter. :;):
Looking at pics of Meridiani plains certainly give us a completely different view of Mars like we've never seen it before.So its not at all surprising that Opportunity gave us the first hard evidence of water on the planet.Yet i find it puzzling that sites like pathfinder site and gusev crater look distinctively different in the fact that these areas seem to have been exposed to water as well:at least thats what it appears to be the case judging from orbital pics:Ares vallis being right at the mouth of a huge water flow and so is gusev.Could it be that the evidence of water at these 2 latter sites has been eradicated in contrast to that at Meridiani and hence signifying a different era (older era) of water history at pathfinder and Spirit sites?Any thoughts? ???
Just hope the huygens probe wont be a disaster like Beagle 2 lander.
Personally i dont see why resurrection and miracles should be discussed in the context of finding life on Mars!Jesus of Nazareth story is a political..historical one that belongs to earth...now whether one believes in a divine dimension to this event is something that depends on each individuals beliefs.