You are not logged in.
How much you want to bet that thing will be a honeymoon resort in a couple hundred years?
The emergency lanes and easments could be used as such and would power the world with all that area.
Nope. People whine when so much as a lamp post is solar powered because they say it's ugly.
I always thought it would be cool to build a blimp big enough to get a second stage/manned capsule to the maximum possible altitude, and then angle the blimp and fire it off the rest of the way.
Granted there would be no forward momentum, but there would also be little to no air resistance, and reduced gravity to overcome.
It will never happen on Earth. Everyone will remember seeing Kevin Costner drink his pee in Waterworld, and go EEEEWWWWWWWWW!
LO
If it wasn't us, sooner or later someone was going to do it.
So lets make them play catch up.
Do it
After all, if you have so much money to waste... YOU PAY, we watch
We prefer to have medicare for everybody, free schools, free nurseries, universities which's fare is 300 $ A YEAR.
safe trains that go at 200 miles an hour, owning half the production of Soyouz, 52 nuclear plants that assure us cheap electricity![]()
We're so stupid froggies
None of those things are free, and none will exist without national security.
But you just just sit tight while we do it, and you can sit safely under the umbrella, so that we can hold one more thing over your head every time you disagree with us. :;):
If it wasn't us, sooner or later someone was going to do it.
So lets make them play catch up.
Needless to say, I won't be offering my services to help with the programming; might as well ask a chimpanzee to do calculus!
Well you know what they say, put a monkey in a room with a typewriter, and eventually it will write Shakespeare.
The only way to justify the billions is to make whatever robot is used a mutlipurpose platform capable of a wide range of missions under Project Constellaton, and to use the Hubble as a testbed.
Though someone must always lose in a race it may not always be the winner that wins. AS indicated by the florida today title http://www.floridatoday.com/!NEWSROOM/s … tm]Victory will jump-start space plans I beg to question will it.
It is felt that since Nasa has four years to get started down the road to space exploration that it would be hard to undue.
This is what they hope to accomplish in that time frame.And during Bush's second term, analysts said NASA would have time to get the initiative off to a solid start by:
Launching an initial robotic mission to map the moon, measure the radiation environment and attempt to find stores of water ice at the lunar poles.
Developing prototypes for a crew exploration vehicle and then staging a "fly-off" between the top two contenders.
Selecting launch vehicles to ferry astronauts and cargo on moon missions.
Designing lunar landers and other systems for the initiative.
Well we will just have to see if the congress continues to fight the president all the way to the bank or if there will be concession along the way during the next four years.
Given the existing public support for space, I don't think Bush will have a problem if he sells it directly to the American people.
This will be even easier once the engineers cook up some designs, and some pretty pictures see the light of day.
Is or is not the point of the CEV to be reusable?
It seems completely possible to me that we can build a capsule sturdy enough to be reusable. The only sticking point is the heat shield.
I don't buy the whole cell phone arguement. What about all the wealthy cell phone users who are too busy to ever use there land line?
Wasn't there a video a while back featuring a capsule that parachuted down, and then deployed airbags for a soft landing.
It was on a test stand that tested the air bags.
Well, the redskins lost, so....
I don't understand the fuss. You can't tell me that the Chinese wouldn't, if they were able, try to knock out our GPS satillites in the event of a war.
Theres no great reason for Europe to build a second system other than to compete with US by providing the service to smaller regional players.
The reason is to do with the nature of the GPS itself. There is a need for a lot more acurate system than the one currently provided by the US satelites. It means that to get the within the coordinates Galileo will give it has to have a lot more satelites to operate. GPS is a military system designed to guide weapons and aircraft to the general are of a target. It has a very bad error ratio making sure your within 15 metres. Galileo is a civilian system designed to have a person on the ground know to high degree of error exactly where he is. Good for making buildings in the right place for locating specific points for a map and what it is fundementally designed for the eventual, place locating system for the operation of cars that drive themselves. And Galileo will give an accuracy of close to 1 metre.
We have GPS guilded bombs that can do alot better than "a general area".
And building tolerences are a lot smaller than one meter.
I don't understand the fuss. You can't tell me that the Chinese wouldn't, if they were able, try to knock out our GPS satillites in the event of a war.
Theres no great reason for Europe to build a second system other than to compete with US by providing the service to smaller regional players.
How hard is it really to throw together a second stage guidance package with a couple of truss segments and some solar panels in it? Compared to half billion dollar shuttle mission?
Why does it burn out after 30 hours?
Without an end goal, all this "research" Kerry wants to fund will be seen as dead weight and will be an even easier target in the halls of Congress than Bush's more expensive exploration efforts.
Ideally spacecraft should be launched from the equator so they take advantage of the earth's rotation but I wouldn't build a launch facility in another country. I don't think there is really a need for another launch complex but building one in Southern Texas might be an option.
Porto Rico maybe, or one of our pacific possesions.
Although if they "can't stand" a few small rockets impacting an uninhabited area, then I doubt they'll stand some big ones taking off.
Granted, this does nothing to avoid the hurricanes, but the damage can be avoided by building it right.
No ones talking about reactors bigger than 500 kilowatts. Why?
Is it just the size and launch weight? Or is there some technical reason?
Were going to need much larger reactors for any long term serface missions, at least at first.
During game 4 of the world series no less.
Maybe the Red Sox are going to get some "celestial" help.
ISS's robot arm will be essential to the assembly of the station in the absence of the shuttle. It will be the only work platform available to the astronauts and cosmonauts.
Kinda makes you wonder why they decided to send the cupola up last. ???
• Negotiate with international partners to obtain best way to transport remaining heavy modules to the ISS
I though the remaining heavy modules were all dependent on a shuttle like environment.
I suppose if we wanted to do our last flights, while they developed a cargo module in the 2005-2007 timeframe. Then as we shift to to the CEV developement, we also field a Shuttle-C HLV for use further down the line in the 2008-2010 timeframe. Then we just use the Shuttle-C and CEV to put the remaining modules up.
Its all about the money. Sooner or later we'll find something that will justify the cost.
The aluminum actually makes the concreate stronger and lighter. It is process they use here on Earth. The only danger is it may explode if left covered. Millions of gas hydrogen bubbles form as the mixture sets and the Hydrogen just seeps out the pores over time.The bubbles fill with air over time and this makes the concrete a good insulator,also. I think they will find a vast sub surface reservoir of water on the moon very soon.
You sit have to have something to make the concrete.
On a side note, is it possible to take the Helium-3 thats on the moon and, and split that , into individual helium atoms, and split those into hydrogen without making it unlessly radioactive?