You are not logged in.
Yes, the Dead Sea as well.
The Salton Sea, in North America for instance, but for that one I don't expect that reason will rule.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salton_Sea
If the Colorado river had been allowed to fill that basin, and then have an outlet to the sea, that area of desert could be productive aquatic agriculture.
Of course now the water is wanted elsewhere, and the farms in depression will not be allowed to flood.
There are likely too many vested interests that would fight it tooth and nail.
Then there is Death Valley
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_Valley
But for that one there are serious problems with lifting the water over into it's brim. Of course you could capture hydroelectric energy from the water as it then descended, but there would also be a problem of accumulating salt.
On the bright side, once water was put into the valley it might fall as rain several times, perhaps 7 times.
But again, it would probabably be impossible to make such a change, now that the area is controlled by vested interests, and those types of people who feel "Natural" is how things should be.
I would not feel so all alone, everybody must get stoned
I also see screaming monkeys and hooting apes. What then? Do they merit our concern?
An interesting connectable process.
Here is another:
http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/12967
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22446641
Photosynthetic microorganisms have higher growth rates compared with plants, and the production systems can be based on non-arable land.
Bags of water on the surface would be the simplest greenhouse, protected from freeze thaw cycles by thermal inertia and phase change thermal resistance.
As I see it a web of interconected processes would make the most sense.
Solar CO2 Reduction, Boidiesel as sources of hydrocarbon fuels.
Mushrooms, and fish to consume the scraps from both processes.
In some cases breaking organic waste into Methane, to release as a greenhouse gas perhaps, or to be recycled to an artificial Methane seep.
I am hoping that at some point Mushrooms could be genetically altered to have some of the nutitional value of green vegtibles, and perhaps meat.
Both processes to generate liquid fuels Solar-CO2 Reduction, and Biodiesel are solar.
With a good source of water, and the ability to fabricate large plastic bags, however, I now favor the biodiesel. Fresh ice water would not require that the bags be pressurized much at all.
Photosynthetic microorganisms have higher growth rates compared with plants, and the production systems can be based on non-arable land.
With Mushrooms altered to provide a better spectrum of human nutrition, and a few greenhouses, and perhaps some chemically driven fish farms, productivity sufficient to support a human population on Mars seems plausable.
This would eliminate a large amount of windows with differential pressure across them and also reduce the amount of artificial lighting for plants that would be required.
At the same time a fuel source for industry would be established.
It is only 92 feet below sea level, so maybe just a bit of help. But there are some other places.
I modified my post, perhaps you will tolerate this being here, if not I will delete it for you.
http://poetinthecity.wordpress.com/2011 … -counting/
Weeping tears an a forever night.
Gliding on the mirror of dark sky.
Waters wavering reflections.
But none of them banana's, only lights.
Ok, for Clark, and to confuse things ![]()
That wasn't nice ![]()
Panicking about the Oceans rising is just silly, it is not the same thing as a tidal wave or a flood. A rising ocean level is gradual, people will have plenty of time to move. So engineering the Earth to preserve old structures is just plain silly.
Really, measure the board, then cut it.
Karovs issue is he wants to create Caspia. It is interesting, because it is a notion to teraform Earth. If it has value I guess it could be considered, but I think Karov just likes to exercise his imagination and other skills.
I am not panicking. I live quite far above the water line in fact.
After taking proper measurements, it may be decided that "engineering the Earth to preserve old structures is just plain silly" or not. One interesting point is that the Dutch might be interested in helping the Caspian nations do that engineering. And I would not necessarily dismiss the notion that New York City and other such places might be willing to help finance and engineer such a project, to protect their own interests.
The options are to manipulate or adapt.
Cheep does not necessarily get you the best things.
The value of the constructed objects on the collective shores of the whole Earth for the connected oceanic waters must be massive.
To seek an option to protect those assets, by dumping excess ocean water into a lower than sea level depression is worth considering.
Particularly if that would then give the adjacent countries more fish, shoreline, and to some extent more rain.
Having a stable shore line is also of value.
You move everything inland, and then in 50 years have to do it again....That would soak up a lot of wealth, and make everyone poorer.
Not that I am against adaptation. A pressure to adapt weeds out the non-adaptive, who typically are specialists who spend most of their time blocking progress, and soaking up the wealth, and expending it on more of them.
But in this case I am not looking for a genetically better human race, rather the preservation of wealth, the better to use to to extend to space travel.
A possible source of food, feedstock for plastics, soil for other crops.
Fuel from renewable energy and CO2 (Water also I presume)
http://phys.org/news/2014-05-method-bis … oxide.html
Mushrooms
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l05knxG6eT0
Aquatic Microbes
http://www.scientificamerican.com/slide … lide-show/
Methane seeps
http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/essay_vogt.html
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 … 135149.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_seep
So, I have hit on some of these before elsewhere and elsewhen. But the fuel production obviously would interesting as a fuel source. But Martian soil mixed with oil and treated with Mushrooms, might become more suitable for other crops.
The Mushrooms themselfs are a food item.
Cold Seeps could be created in the in aquatic environments, and bacteria at the base of a food chain.
The value of a fuel and Oxygen based agriculture, is that in the high lattitudes where most of the water is, seasonal variations will make winter a harder time to produce food that depends on sunlight, but fuel and Oxygen can be stored for winter use.
And the same processes will support a plastic industry, and of course internal combustion engines, and fuel cells.
Graphic and caption text from the U.S. Navy All Hands web site, April 1998.
"While exploring the Haakon Mosby Mud Volcano, NRL researchers discovered several 'new' species of marine life. In addition to 'vermicelli-spaghetti-like' tubeworms, scientists found more than 20 new species of meiofauna (sand-grain-sized animals) and a bottom-fish density more than one hundred times that found on the normal seafloor. Photosynthesis does not provide the basis for this deep ocean food chain, methane-based chemosynthesis does. The fish, dominated by a species of eelpout measuring the length of a pen, congregate around the mud volcano much like seagulls do at the local dump."The most common fish found were scalebelly eelpout (Lycoides squamiventer). Stomach contents of these fish included tubeworms and other chemosynthesis-dependent creatures, confirming that the fish are indeed part of the local ecosystem. The eelpout was several hundred times more abundant on the mud volcano than elsewhere on the bottom of the surrounding Greenland-Norwegian Sea, and is apparently attracted to the mud volcano by its abundant food supplies.
For me the issue is planetary cultural sanity. If so called green house effect is true, then mustering the human race to address it in a rational manner is sadly not true. Someone will want to sell their hydrocarbons, and someone will be desperate enough to buy and burn them.
I am not in love with the don't do that people either. The ones who say OK, you had a life, but now you should settle for sleeping with vermin and please fade away without discomforting us with your whining. (While they just wallow in their own inportance).
Caspia, is perhaps the most do-able project, a splint for a broken leg, since we cannot prevent the human race from being irrational, perhaps our asian cousins can flip the human race a favor. If the sea levels are to rise, and if the Iranians and Russians are to have to0 little water (In that area), and if Holland is to loose it's polders, and if the south sea nations are to become under water, then a sector of humanity might find a way to change the future. Protect important human property (The coastlines of the great ocean, and the productive structures that are there). Buy a little time.
The North American project would yield much fresh water, and earth quakes for a time, but it is beyond our technological, social, energy, and economic powers at this time.
They are in a period of incompetence just now, and the thing asked is massive. It is pointless to play at that table. Either you guys will handle this matter, or no-one will.
I would like to point out that this could be practiced on Mars in places.
I would pick a glacier in Hellas.
http://www.redorbit.com/news/space/1371 … s_craters/
http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Marti … ports.html
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap081124.html
http://www.jsg.utexas.edu/news/2008/11/ … latitudes/
The favorable factors are:
1) The air pressure in Hellas is thicker, so better radiation protection.
2) Big water supply for some time.
3) It is not utterly impossible that some type of Lichen could be cultivated in the open surface, with a bit of UV protection. (Lichen as we know them are slow growing however).
4) Surface greenhouses are an option, with various levels of pressurization.
5) Solar energy is available on the surface, but would be seasonal, but that’s not necessarily bad, if your economic activities are scheduled for the availability of energy.
Beyond that dirty Ice above a layer of Sandstone or Salt caverns would be a very good opportunity to build a multi-layered city, where the upper caves were more similar to the outside environment, and each lower layer was more and more like Earths atmosphere.
Dirty Ice and Sandstone, or salt would be possible to build caves in most likely.
One thing that most Mars settlement schemes I have seen lack is a good way to create lots of living space in an economic way.
So, on the surface greenhouses to grow bulk food, and a few smaller types that allow humans in shirt sleeves to interact with vegetation and the sunlight.
The first layer of caves would be unpressurized and carved into the glacier. Places to put machinery, that might manufacture special chemicals from atmospheric chemicals. Storage for food, and parts perhaps.
The next layer of caves pressurized to 1/3 bar with Martian atmosphere. This one in the ice as well. As a passage between levels, and also as a place where toxic chemical processes could be carried out.
Since humans would suffocate in such an environment, the would have a breathing suit, but not a pressure suit. Toxic gasses would be vented to the outside as possible and convenient. Hopefully some of them would be greenhouse gasses.
The next layer would be O2 @ 1/3 bar pressure.
The last ice cave layer would be N2/O2 @ 1 bar pressure. Things like ice hockey could be supported, or ice skating. People do not live by bread alone.
In both cases it would be possible to have heated sheds with artificial lights to cultivate certain plants if that makes economic or spiritual sense. For instance Apple trees. If the soil at the bottom of the ice cave is thick enough and thermally insulating enough, it would be possible to heat a “Tented” area to sufficient temperatures to allow a growing season. Providing Apples and wood. Then a unheated season would be provided which would be tolerable to the trees, and would allow the long term thermal balance of the soil and ice layer below it.
Finally I would hope to transition into sandstone, but perhaps even a salt cavern. (Sandstone is much more likely).
That would be to provide housing for humans, although some of the Ice caves could host homes for humans.
(Note: There could be a N2/O2 1 bar ice cave with special acoustics for Eskimo’s to scream in)
Such tricks learned on Mars could be instructive as to how to similar things on Titan and other worlds perhaps.
The human race is not ready for an logical management of Earth. If they were, then they would understand that a very big change is going to occur, What was cannot continue. It is very sad I do not wish for what might come. They have demanded it by their actions however.
The second time I try to respond and then my post is vanished.
Anyway thank you for your patience.
I was helped to understand by your response.
This is a entertaining post.
I very much have reservations about any alteration of Earth, for political reasons. We would put up with massive nonsense, humans being what they are.
I do say that yes the Caspian offers the best opportunity to mitigate rising oceans.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea
I say as well that if we had a different economy as perhaps some day will exist. An abundant energy source and robots that don't want to exterminate us but help us, we might suppose other things of the kind, such as Nevada of North America being a land of seas with green mountain ranges. Or the deep basin of China north of Tibet also being a sea.
Why? For the fresh water. Evaporation would condense on the mountain ranges. The great basin is I think the best hope for that silly notion. China's chance requires even more human capability. But yes, just the filling of Caspia? will protect such shore lines as we have now. That's a lot of valuable real estate. It is not a stupid notion. When you set the plan of filling the Caspian basin with more water against the need to protect Holland, and New York and pacific island nations, perhaps it is a sensible plan.
Karov, you started this, will you check in? :-)
RobertDyck, I have a problem with what you have said. No fresh water layer could persist below a heavier salt layer. It can't be correct. Salt water sinks in the presence of fresh water unless it is very much warmer. Can you correct this unhappy not understanding?
OK, I will play.
Supposing the nations with coastlines consented due to the value of the change, it also could reduce the supposed rise in sea levels in the major oceans, but just a little.
I once had thought that if sea water could be impounded into basins in the North American great basin, then evaporation and the rings of mountains would generate much fresh water. Impractical as far as I can see, for the needed energy, the disposal of accumulated salts, and also there are very few people who really want to do the real work needed to establish the infrastructure in my tribes at this time (Most of them want to do fake work involving a desk, meetings, and general red tape (Ape) interference with getting things done, and of course pay unmerited).
But your Caspia plan makes more sense than that.
A sort of local Terraforming on Earth it seems.
Somehow I missed that. Feel at ease to remove this thread if you want, I will not be unhappy. Sorry.
I guess, I. Use such similar notions to dispute those who would say interstellar travel is impossible. I am thinking oort cloud to oort cloud. Thousands of years in the future.
This is something I have not heard of previouisly:
http://phys.org/news/2014-05-nasa-sauce … light.html
Since I am poorly equiped to understand it mathmatically (I can grasp general concepts, but don't bother with finely tuned models, since I will never go to Mars anyway).
But I am guessing some of you will lend a hand to understand it.
It looks like it is rather high risk. I wonder just how "New" these concepts are?
I did not want to step on what you are proposing. That is fine, I just wanted to augment it with the potential of Dwarf Planets, rocky asteroids displaced into the outer solar system, and interstellar travel. I do agree with your point that a certain sized comet might be more ideal.
I will not stop there, but offer a helper, a double vacuum shell world.
I have considered that a metalic/silicate double shell world could offer an environment where a vehicle could have wheel contact with both an outer shell and a nearby inner shell, a non-pressurized enviornment, but one which could facilitate the retention and re-collection of some lost evaporates. The vehicle being mobile within a slightly more than 2 dimensional sphere bounded by an inner shell and an outer shell may house humans. If small, then no synthetic gravitation. If larger the gap between shells, then synthetic gravitation.
The void inside of the inner shell would be a place to store materials and machine parts and such, a dump/warehouse more or less.
The mobile habitats which exist between shells could travel the domain between shells, and so interact with each other, to perform tasks. Robotic systems being used to manipulate objects in a partial vacuum, (Nearly complete) between shells.
I do like the idea of pressurized shell worlds without a core.
I think they could be sensible for a future reality where stony/metalic materials could be obtained from the inner solar system or from comets or dwarf planets where an impact has stripped most of the ice off.
Here are some links about "Dwarf Planets".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwarf_planet
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/26/tech/inno … ar-system/
I put an interstellar twist on this as well. While if the human type or some derivative of the human type may persist into the future and may find ways to travel to the nearest stars, I really do understand that that such a enormous task as to cause pause and unbelief in the notion.
However modification of the human species, connected with better propulsion systems, and leapfrogging across tiny worlds might suggest the chance that some derivative of the human race may become a star spanning humanoid type.
We can hope that small rocky asteroids have been displaced into the Kepler belt, and the Oort Cloud. If so, then with an energy source, (Fusion, Vast focused solar concentrator, dark matter interface, dark energy????), I would suggest the preference would be to create shells without a core around dwarf planets. cause them to be moons of such worlds. For Pluto, it might be possible to mess with Charon. Melt the interior, push a bubble of air into it and cause cryovolcanos on the surface, which will freeze. Repeat? Then strip mine Pluto to make more shell moons. In this case, it might be possible to have an economy where humans desiring housing, offer their savings, to obtain such, and that money could pay to obtain materials that those dwarf planets could not supply. Eventually, however the ice layer would be removed, and a rocky/metalic core exposed. Then a different economic reality.
So, the ideas I have in my head from news articles, are:
1) Mars may have had an initial Oxygen rich atmosphere due not to life, but to the break down of liquid water by UV light, where the Oxygen tended to linger, and the Hydrogen tended to depart into space.
2) Earth started with a non-oxygen atmopsphere.
3) Life may have been able to pass between the two worlds from almost the beginning of them until now, but I expect that if Mars had/has life, our existing Oxygen fraction in our atmosphere would be hostile to present life on Mars, but not hostile to any presumed Oxygen tolerant life on early Mars.
4) Viruses may have smeared the boundry between Earth and Mars life, if there were two originations that were similar enough.
5) Very important is "Why would Mars be sterile now?". Big question. It matters a lot I think.
This is a matter that draws my mind now.
From my last post, a link to a article, I have a quote:
So far DiRuggiero has been working with University Valley samples collected during the IceBite team’s first season in the field, in 2009. She’s looking forward to getting her hands on more-extensive samples collected at the end of 2010, samples that are still making their way back from Antarctica.
Beneath the dry soil layer in University Valley is “what we call ice-cemented ground, which is basically frozen mud. And that mud has been frozen for thousands and thousands of years,” says DiRuggiero. “So the question is, Is there any water available for the micro-organisms, and do we see a difference in the microbial community between the soil above and this ice-cemented ground right underneath?”
There is some evidence, based on climate data collected last year by the IceBite team, that at the interface between the dry soil and the frozen mud, “there might be some melting in the summer,” says DiRuggiero. “There might be water available at least part of the time” and microbes might be “actively growing and metabolizing at least during a small portion of the year.”
“Melting,” in this case, doesn’t mean the soil gets soggy or muddy, or that the temperature gets above freezing. Rather, it means that thin layers of liquid water can form between the sand grains that make up the soil and the ice below it. But that’s plenty of water for microbes. They’re small. They don’t need a lot of water.
“At temperatures above -20ºC (-4ºF) there is a layer of unfrozen water between the sand grains and the ice. These layers can support microbial life at least [down] to -15ºC (5ºF),” McKay explained.
“On Mars today the temperatures of the ground ice are much too cold for this effect to be useful,” he wrote. But Mars wobbles. At present Mars is tilted on its axis at about the same angle as Earth’s.
Five million years ago, however, Mars leaned over at an angle of about 45º, and for nearly half of each martian year (equivalent to about one Earth year), the polar regions received constant sunlight. Back then “the ground ice at the polar regions,” like the site where NASA’s Phoenix spacecraft landed in 2008, “would have been much warmer. We think it would have been in the range of -15ºC to -20ºC. So liquid water layers” in the past were “a possibility.”
The question then is this: If life ever took hold on Mars, back when the planet was warmer and wetter, did a few hardy microbes evolve a survival strategy that let them go into a deep sleep, and then every 10 or 20 million years, when the ground warmed up to -20ºC or so, wake up and put on a little growth spurt?
The answer will have to wait until a follow-up mission to the martian polar regions can dig deeper than Phoenix did. It is just such deep polar drilling that McKay’s IceBite project is working to make possible.
While I draw from the above with what I say, and support their intentions, I have to point out that across large parts of Mars is a Duracrust, which I believe consists of fine grained soil, salt, and periodically some moisture.
As integrated into the low atmospheric pressures experience by the Martian surface, I suggest that the deep thermal cycling is a vast blessing to life.
I have said some of these things before. In the Arctic ice pack fresh water ice is generated by periodic low temperatures that squeezes the brine salts out of the ice.
Then on a particularly warm Arctic summer day their could be a instance of this fresher ice melting and providing a habitat for life.
Similarly, I propose that although the sunset and early night of Mars may cause a absorption of moisture into the salt of it from the cooling Martian atmosphere, the deep night should to a degree push brine from the result that then freezes. If pockets, films either fresh or somewhat salty are then warmed by the early Martian daytime sunlight, then temperatures of -15 degC are possible, and so a habitat for life. It is even possible that in cracks and such in the duracrust photo activity could occur. Perhaps even just under the top grains of the crust.
And why it would not be there is an amazing question.
Maybe I need to learn something important?
That seems like a reasonable proposal.
If I were to do it, I would start with a cycling temperature chamber at normal atmosphere for Earth, with a light source very similar to what Earth plants endure, and then through the testing gradually raise the UV to 4% of full Martian environment.
Then I would dump the survivors from that into a harsher environment with the temperature cycling and a lowering atmospheric pressure 12 mb and then 6.
Then I would dump the consequence of that into another chamber where they start by living in a 4% Martian UV value but can propagate to other connected places where the UV levels are progressively higher.
Anyway maybe that would output something useful.
I guess I am hopeful that just by living they will alter the Martian atmosphere, perhaps placing a greater amount of Methane into it than it has, and so deviate it towards a more Earth like situation.
I was never a believer in such things previously, respected the opinion that said that Mars cannot support surface life, but now because of articles such as have been appearing, I think Mars is a life habitable world, and a major question is why does it appear not to have life?
Just doing the adaptive experiments proposed by you might shed light on it, and as general research, that is important too. If life could travel in rocks ejected from Earth, why hasn't it apparently seeded Mars, and altered it's environment? Or did it in the past, and is now extinct for some reason? It might be a way of defining the limits of some of the theory notions that are floating around, even if Mars is never seeded with Earth life.
Therefore a just investment even for the scientific community which has a obsession for finding extra-terrestrial life.