You are not logged in.
Neon and Argon could provide a cloud deck however to trap heat.
I don't expect any such ready made planets, unless it is a particularly young planet, or has an unusual amount of radioactive content.
Otherwise, I am thinking that multiple cloud decks could only occur, if a heavy thick high pressure H2 atmosphere existed above. In that case terraformation would require the removal of it and the addition of additional energy on the surface from fusion I presume. But that is OK. At least for some rogue planets, there might be a way.
I would suppose that a deep atmosphere at first would require robotics operated from orbit, and/or Humans using special equipment such as a Helium/Oxygen atmosphere, and perhaps powered deep sea type suits.
I presume that they would have arrived by orion type fusion propulsion, so they would have Hydrogen bombs to erode the H2 atmosphere away with.
In the improbable case that they found a ready for use planet they would not need those things, but more likely they would.
Using a very close replica of Earth in that situation, I might want to see a Hydrogen Helium atmosphere intruding to the Plateau of Tibet, which would be very very cold.
Further down would be "Puddles" of other atmospheric gasses starting with a small diluted layer of Neon @~25 K, and then below that Nitrogen, Argon, and perhaps in some low places Methane and just maybe CO2.
But that would require that 7 bars of Hydrogen/Helium could hold a temperature of almost ~25 K heat, which might be unlikely. If it was naturally more, then some would have to be removed, and in the "Puddles" Fusion energy would have to be added to keep the Neon, Nitrogen, and Argon inflated.
A world like that @7 Bars (I have been reading your posts) on the Plateau of Tibet, would allow humans to have habitats at ambient pressure on the Plateau, and would allow more favorable thermal characteristics at lower elevation, but less favorable pressure characteristics in exchange. It might be that some type of pressure blocking hull filled with Helium and Oxygen might be able to operate at lower elevations. Or perhaps air planes with pressure hull cabs. Most likely much of any work activities done at the lower elevations would be done with telepresence.
Of course, if the fusion power is ramped up, then more Hydrogen and Helium could be dispersed, and the pressures planet wide lowered.
Perhaps there would be an evolution in that direction over time.
Agent009 supplied:
Void wrote:
Although the Neon is heavier than Nitrogen (Apparently)
Not so. Atomic neon has mole mass of 20.18 g/mol. Molecular nitrogen - 28.01 g/mol. Neon, as "noble gas", does not form diatomic molecules as nitrogen does.
Giving some additional support I did not realize.
Josh argued that Diffusion would act against what I suggested.
I think you are both correct.
I will start by arguing that whatever Hydrogen and Helium could diffuse into the other layers would. But upon being saturated with them any remaining balance of them would float to the top of the atmosphere and pool there.
Nitrogen, Neon, and Argon would be below that in some arrangement. They would indeed have some Hydrogen and Helium mixed with them.
For my continuation I will speculate that water does on Earth what I expect to happen in the Rogue planet for Nitrogen, Neon, and Argon.
Water vapor cannot get into the Stratosphere very much because of a precipitation height. So, stays below that level until large precipitation brings it down. Snow, Rain, Hail.
I don't expect enormous amounts of Neon. Just a little might do.
Because as Agent009 informed me it is lighter than Nitrogen as a Molecule, at the area where the atmosphere transitions into Hydrogen and Helium, I would expect Nitrogen to precipitate out more aggressively than Neon. This would then leave behind a reduced content of Nitrogen in the Mix, and an enhanced content of Neon, Hydrogen, and Helium. This would be a continuing replenishing process I believe, that might resemble air on Earth being dryer after the clouds release their rain.
However I might hope that the Neon would also condense to a degree at about ~25 K, into a fog either droplets or ice fog. Why I care, is Nitrogen needs ~70 K to maintain pressure (Unless at very low pressures). So, the cloud tops for a Neon enhanced layer would only radiate ~25 K to the universe through the Hydrogen and Helium. It is an improvement over radiating ~70 K.
Further, if the Nitrogen then is kept warmer by a Neon cloud deck and the Neon vapors (Don't know if Neon has much greenhouse value, then below that could be a Nitrogen cloud fog.
Maybe also somewhere an Argon cloud fog.
Since the source of heat that matters is geothermal, 3 cloud decks would help a lot.
Then there might be Hydrocarbon fogs somewhere like on Titan.
Particulates in the atmosphere would have a lot to do with the atmospheric behaviors.
To Teraform such a world injecting particulates might be a tool, and of course fusion reactors.
Since such worlds are said to have a heat source of 1/5000th of that of our sun, it is not that far fetched to imaging adding another 1/5000 to the environment from waste heat.
For my part, I would disperse the waste heat into any oceans, and let it move into the atmosphere through the ice, getting double use from it.
With a cold atmosphere, I do not think it would be that far fetched to have domes made of flexible materials, which would be inflated by heated air inside, and which might have a Breathable atmosphere inside.
Some worlds would be better than others.
I hope there's lots of them.
True, 1/5000th might not be enough to keep Neon, Nitrogen, and Argon from freezing, but maybe 1/2500th would or with more aggressive heating that that, such an atmospheric process could be manufactured.
I am just saying that prospects for at least creating a terraformed Rogue planet are improved by what I think can be done.
With enough fusion power on the surface and super greenhouse gasses added perhaps it could eventually host open water, and lighted gardens.
I will be happy for corrections, but;
On a Rogue planet far away from an external heat source, with potential major gasses Hydrogen, Helium, Neon, Nitrogen, Methane, Carbon Dioxide.
Mixing will be reduced because of reduced wind. Even so perhaps although somewhat layered some mixing will occur.
I think the primary laying forces are gravitation on heavier and lighter gasses, and condensation.
Frankly I am trying to beg, borrow, steal a reason why it would behave the way I want it to. Which will very possibly leave me open to attack, but so what.
I am thinking I want a Neon Layer under a Helium Layer, under a Hydrogen layer, and under the Neon, Nitrogen, and under that Argon.
Although the Neon is heavier than Nitrogen (Apparently), I am counting on condensation to contribute to what I want. I am supposing that the Hydrogen and Helium will never condense, because the universe is too warm.
The Neon will mix with Helium and Hydrogen to some extent and form a mixed layer that is just possibly lighter than Nitrogen. The reason I think this is that some of the Neon would perhaps condense into a supercooled state, or an ice fog, and begin to drift downward slowly, making sure that the Neon part of that layer of atmosphere never gets above a certain percentage. I am looking for fog/cloud cover to hold in geothermal heat.
Lower down, I am hoping for another such fog/cloud layer at the boundry of the Nitrogen/Hydrogen-Helium-Neon mix where the mix is too warm to condense Neon, but Nitrogen mixed in can condense into a heat trapping fog.
Finally below that I am hoping for a Nitrogen/Argon interface where Argon condenses into a heat trapping fog.
From there, if all the above were to work, it might be hoped that Methane as a greenhouse gas would hold in heat somewhere in the Nitrogen/Argon column.
And then just possibly below that CO2,
and then incredibly optimistically a layer of water vapor.
However I just included that for fun. I think more likely a frozen surface with the possiblity of under ice oceans, and just maybe geothermal hot springs.
You guys started this thing with Neon. I can see it is heavy, but it also is vapor down to ~25 K. So I tried to find a way it could help, and just maybe I did.
I didn't mention Hydrocarbon Fogs to hold in heat either.
http://www.space.com/26356-time-capsule … ystem.html
http://web.mit.edu/aeroastro/labs/spl/research_ieps.htm
Apparently emittng salt particles is more efficient than emitting gas. This is currently for small systems, but does not rule out use for human space flight eventually.
I don't actually have any important technical knowledge, and it is perhaps a stupid notion, but perhaps emitting fine dust will not be ruled out eventually? In that case dust from Asteroids, the Moon, Phobos, Demos? But they are using salt. A more efficient (Collection of tiny engines) that emits particles of solid materials though is somewhat of a new path though. I am interested.
Nano scale machines having been proposed in technology, I would not say that it is forever impossible.
Drawing on knowledge provided by others here and adding my own speculation, I wonder if ion propulsion of particles could eventually be combined with magnetic mass driver technology.
Giving particles a kick with both electrostatic and magnetic forces. I understand that ion engines already involve magentic fields (Or I think so), but perhaps not pulsing magnetic fields.
So to make a superior dust, I suggest using the Mond process to create a liquid from Iron and Nickle, and then using a spray paint process to create tiny beeds which would condense to solid before impacting a wall, and would have some magnetic properties. Making things more complicated, perhaps non magnetic materials could be deposited on the outside of these very tiny beeds, to add mass, and to utilize non magnetic mass.
In the propulsion process then, some kind of a nano scale conveyor process to feed them at a prefered rate into a combined ion/magnetic mass driver engine(s).
Josh,
I would defer to a lower number, myself, unless otherwise corrected.
However, there is the possibility that white dwarfs and neutron stars create a new set of planets, and some of those might get ejected. Also without evidence, I speculate that nova and supernova events ejecting much complex matter, perhaps it does not all disperse evenly, but some might settle into swirls gravitationally bound, and perhaps some of those might eventually condense into "Planets".
The truthful honest answer is "I don't know" isn't it.
Agent009. That was an older article. If you dig, you will find reference to the atmosphere having to be thick enough for a pressure at the surface up to that of our ocean bottoms. Also, there is a mention that any disturbance to the atmosphere, perhaps an impactor could cause it to disperse. (But then it might collect a new hydrogen atmosphere. Anyway the article indicates that such a pressurized and very thick Hydrogen atmosphere has a very very good green house effect).
Although the articles do not mention it, I would argue a "Best Case" (From a human view) would be enough Hydrogen to greenhouse a nitrogen layer below it, so that the top of the nitrogen layer was at 70 degrees K. A substantial layer of Helium below the Hydrogen and above the Nitrogen is unlikely, but there would be some. Then within the Nitrogen atmosphere could be supported Methane perhaps, and if the lower layers were warmer, CO2. From that perhaps liquid water could exist ideally with less of a total atmospheric pressure.
But in reality even better for humans would be that case with the modification of no open water, but a more long lasting ocean with a layer of ice over it.
Such a world might not have a atmospheric pressure that was such a challenge. It also could be hoped that it had mountains with lower pressure where cities could be built.
I have serious reservations on the thought that H2 could provide enough greenhouse effect to warm the Nitrogen to 70 K + on it's own without pushing the pressure too high for a human habitat.
The only possible "Out" I could speculate on is if H2 at a substantial density could have a super greenhouse gas disolved into it. Such gases are too heavy to stay with the Hydrogen otherwise. Further, I don't know if there could be a super greenhouse gas that could remain disolved in an H2 column of say 0-3 bars at 60 K. I might wish for one.
All speculation though.
Under Ice Oceans:
http://www.wired.com/2011/02/steppenwolf-planet/
http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=16794
Thick Atmopheres:(Hydrogen and/or Helium on top, maybe Nitrogen below?) (Pressure at the bottom of atmosphere like the bottom of our oceans)
Based on initial estimates, approximately two free-flying planets exist for every "normal" star in our galaxy, but the results of the new study produced even more staggering findings: nomad planets may be up to 50,000 times more common than that.
Open water oceans?? (Under very very thick Hydrogen atmosphere:
http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=99236
Nice conversation you are doing on this one.
Terraformer. My intentions are good. From time to time I do mess with you, but it should not be seen as malicious intent.
Tom, I used a "Abb Energizer" some time back before I joined a gym. It had problems, if you don't apply the conductive goo correctly, you can burn little holes in your skin. However well trained persons with time on their hands (In a spaceship sometimes you would have time on your hands). It did help. But I got brain damage and started posting on New Mars.
It must be FDA approved.
Whats your story?
Taraformer. I also encounter situations where their is no response, and I have to attribute that to the possiblity that my posts are no good. In that case I should stop.
Again a different situation is just like the above. Most of the people here want to paint the interior of the house before they consult an archetect, lay the foundations, put up the frame and put in the wiring and drywall. I attribute it to a precision and accuracy oriented skill set. Being a master of what is. But to find a new way, you have to be careful what you dismiss without due consideration. It is typical that things proposed are not discussed properly because it's not "tried and true".
Some people display skill by being able to play existing music with precision and style that is known to please. Some people express skill by being inventive/creative. To do that, you don't have a yes/no response. (And I am not criticising you Taraformer). In order to create a new pattern, you must draw from the library of experience. Here I do have experience in electrical stimulation, but the response is not "I have concerns about that what are the medical implications?" or "What value can that add to a mission?"
Instead it is a false claim that centrifugal synthetic gravity has been tested in microgravity, and that it is without medical problems. Now I think it will probably work, but I notice that there are no test devices in orbit. It is hard to test it on Earth.
My notion of suggesting it was that it could be tested on Earth, and it might be a cost effective way to reduce the deterioration of humans on missions in space.
Further I notice that their is no comentary on several notions I proposed:
Sleeping standing up in a ~Ceres level gravitational field in a harness.
A two part frame to stress the main bone system.
Creating a carrier ship that can double as a space station successor to the one we have now, and might be used for 3 purposes useful to space efforts conserving $$$.
Yes/No decisions on inovation early in the game is no way to process an idea.
The level of utility here on this site, utility to learn and understand is substandard in many cases, and it is hard for me to justify investing my time and efforts.
Did you know that I mentioned that I had a new space suit scheme, and not one person inquired as to what that was.
So, I am taking a break of unknown length.
I have too many other things to do that matter to me at this time, and I don't see a satisfactory return on my investment, or I actually am a goofus that is getting in the way. Either way, my time is wasted.
I have enjoyed corresponding with many of you.
Alright, I guess I will set your site free from me. Good luck. I'm going to try to stay away, but maybe not permanent. I hope you get it back to what it was.
What I think is the idea can be explored.
Step 1 would be to do bed tests, where a bed is tilted with feet at a lower elevation. To test the blood pooling issue. The other aspects could be tested.
Step 2 If it seem possible that a synthetic gravity similar to Ceres helps to prolong heath (Along with the compression/tension device, and electric stimulation/Exercise), then I speculate that a new space station that can also be used as a pseudo cycler, could be built in Earth orbit. It would include a structure suitable for deep space travel, and a power plant, synthetic gravity/fuel tank, and a frame that supplies and equipment could be attached to.
* If my understanding is correct, then the international space station will become obsolete, and the Russians take some parts from it. I suggest that to construct the new space station/cycler, it would not hurt to take a look at the possible reuse of some components to construct the new space station. In addition I believe there may be a device already constructed on the surface of the Earth to test synthetic gravity, which was not deployed?
Step 3 would be to test the new station/cycler, and also confirm the utility of the treatments to reduce the rate and magnitude of deterioration of humans.
At that point it could be confirmed that that device could be incorporated into a Mars mission.
Would it ever be an Earth space station again? Maybe it would be stationed in association with the Moon after the Mars mission. So perhaps it's construction might have an eye on that.
So I am looking at making it pay. The cost would serve 3 missions. A space station to be the successor of the existing one, perhaps smaller, A one time Mars mission, and finally a space station in L1, L2, L3, L4, or L5, to support access to the Moon for international/Business oriented activities.
In that role, perhaps a small human crew on the station would use remotely controlled robotics to work with the Moon, with occasional human visits to the Moon if necessary.
I presume that the humans returning from Mars would abandon it to a solar orbit, and re-enter the Earths atmosphere with heat shields. So to get it from a solar orbit to a L# orbit, a robotic mission might be employed that would go get it and reposition it to a L# location.
Would you like to be able to afford the mission or be unrealistic?
If you are going to do that, why not consider Proxima Centauri?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxima_Centauri
A nuclear reactor that will last?
The mixing of the fuel at Proxima Centauri's core through convection and the star's relatively low energy-production rate suggest that it will be a main-sequence star for another four trillion years,[18] or nearly 300 times the current age of the universe.[
That should be enough time for the human race ![]()
I suggest that as the star is variable and puts a lot of energy out in dangerous radiation and solar wind (I think) the "Sphere" should try to utilize those energy sources.
It is not ruled out that it may have objects in orbit around it.
Searches for companions orbiting Proxima Centauri have been unsuccessful, ruling out the presence of brown dwarfs and supermassive planets.[20][21] Precision radial velocity surveys have also ruled out the presence of super-Earths within the star's habitable zone.[22][nb 3] The detection of smaller objects will require the use of new instruments, such as the proposed James Webb Space Telescope.
I am not interested in habitable zone planets in this case. In order to retain a Nitrogen atmosphere on a planet around this star, the further away the better, up to the point of atmospheric collapse due to cold. But such a cold Earth/Venus/Mars/Titan may or may not exist.
Your idea might be suitable for this star to supplement the natural objects in orbit (If any). I would consider an incandescent method. Concentrate heat from the star on a point of the shell, where high temperature metals are used, and allow that to glow inside of the shell. The inside of the shell being a vacuum at that location. Perhaps a glass enclosure to reflect the heat wavelengths back to the glowing point, and to allow a spectrum closer to that of our sun. Then perhaps inside the rest of the shell, whatever is useful to the inhabitants whatever they become. If like humans, then greenhouses for plants?
You are talking Mars, and cyclers, and an electric/chemical mix, so;
I notice that a constraint is imposed by the orbital relationship of Mars and Earth, requiring a rigid timing for the launch of missions.
Cyclers have a birth and a death by default. Maybe as a habitat the death can be put off with repairs, but here the concern is the support of a mission to Mars, so not a long term habitat.
I think that things could be improved by making a cycler which is primarily electric driven, which would also use gravitational assists by interacting with Earth. The cycler would start out as electric-unpersoned, and would evolve into a partially gravity encounter driven device.
It would be comprised of primary electrical capabilities, solar or nuclear, and an electric drive, and also a low level synthetic gravity (Specific to a human habitat part) device. In addition it would provide refueling for a personed associated mission, and such redundancy failsafes as might be added for a mission to Mars.
I have wondered how fast a person would deteriorate if in the gravity field of Ceres. Supposing that Mars was achieved in a A to B fashion, supporting the further expansion of humans into space, the exploration of this question has value.
I suggest that the pseudo-cycler could have a baton type rotor habitat suitable to generate a simulation of Ceres, and answer that question, while the mission was occurring.
So the aspect of human deterioration I would hope to study and perhaps modify with this process would be the fluid pooling in the upper body, which makes humans uncomfortable and also damages some things perhaps like the eyes.
A human perhaps lies down for 1/3 of the day in a bed, and yet is not damaged by that. So, the body must be able to temporarily compensate for the loss of standing up in a gravitational field, for a significant part of the day. Further, most people must only be on their feet for a minority part of the day.
Further, I am hoping that for the fluid pooling problem, the effects are not a strait line. That even a small gravity field might allow the body to adjust fluid pooling in the gravitation of Ceres. If not, then at least it is further learned that the problem is larger.
For the pseudo cycler, the tank/habitat could be an holding tank for a "Fuel" for the electric rocket. When it was empty it could be modified to be a habitat. Needed equipment brought into the habitat from places outside where they had been stored.
When this apparatus is primed to the proper orbit by gravitational assists, Then the human mission would begin. I suggest redundant spacecraft, two capsules capable of atmospheric return of some type. A intercept of the cycling device by that human mission with some thought on how to abort back to Earth if possible in the event of a system failure.
The cycler having developed a elliptical orbit from electrical and gravitational processes would be primed for the mission. As the high point of the orbit could be anywhere, this then modifies the limits of the present situation where alignments of Mars and Earth restrict the timing of missions.
The primary human capsule being specifically crafted to land on Mars and perform the Mars mission, the secondary being crafted to encounter one or two of the moons of Mars, but also being crafted to do an emergency rescue of persons on the surface of Mars in the event that was called for.
Should the human mission successfully merge with the cycler, then a automatic return abort would be in place. However to reach Mars, if all systems were good, then a propulsive alteration of orbit would be implemented, and the game would be on. Propulsion should stop some time before encountering Mars, so that the two atmospheric entry devices could be separated from the main craft to be allowed to spin on tethers, to provide a greater synthetic gravitation, to prepare the humans for action on the ground at Mars. However the separation from the main craft and this synthetic gravitational device would be only enough to avoid collisions.
Prior to the encounter and capture into the gravitational field of Mars, the hardware would be secured together again, and whatever propulsion could accomplish the capture would be put into process.
At Mars, whatever pre-positioned supplies/devices would be have been put into place in orbit and on the ground as might be useful to support the objectives.
Methods to return to Earth to finish the mission would be open to best options, so I choose not to specify on that.
Returning to the cruse phase where the humans might be experimenting with a low gravitational simulation, (Ceres), I suggest that as a supplement humans might try to sleep standing up in the synthetic gravitation, with a harness. Perhaps it is possible. Also, I also suggest a upper body frame/harness, and a lower body frame/harness which would be actuated against each other to both compress the Legs/spine and tension them in suitable fashion to stimulate the bones. I suggest that if there is going to be a private mission using a free return they consider trying this method to help reduce the rate of bone loss.
As for radiation protection, the pseudo cycler might be able to afford that, so while in cruse phase the humans would have significant protection.
Obviously exercise would be utilized where possible to reduce musel deterioration. I also suggest that the electrical stimulation of mussels be investigated, such as is being used to try to help persons who cannot walk without it. This could also have value for the bones.
I'm done.
Not so long ago, I went on a canoe trip into an area near the Canadian border. We picked a rocky campsite with no tree to hang our pack from. But their was a very high cliff, so we hung our packs from that down the side. Our tents were perhaps 30 feet from that. Guess what? A mother bear and two cubs "Can" figure out how to pull a pack up a cliff. They enjoyed our sausage and cheese, and did not like my protein bars. They also growled at us with red eyes when my partners shined lights on them. We were lucky, as we then sat in our tents and waited for them to finish. I calmly heard them walking by my corner maybe 3 feet from me.
Don't tempt a bear, and don't underestimate their ability to figure things out.
We fished and did well, so the trip was OK.
Use a tree if you are an eagle, don't wrestle the bears.
Clark is right, I am done with this thread. We need to focus on Mars, or at least the solar system.
My opinion is that the older a culture is, without representative tradition, the harder it is to modify it to what we consider representative government.
We tollerated lots of shortcommings from our nearer neighbors, and with patience have seen many near cultures move in directions we favor. Much of South America and Mexico and such are somewhat improved.
We ourselves, suffer from captive govenment entities like the FDA (Under strong influence from corporations), and other non-democratic government entities, and are going backwards to a degree ourselves.
I consider government to be any individual of collection of individuals that has the power to regulate how I live my life. So elected officials are becomming less and less important.
Russia/Soviet Union is/was composed of a spectrum of types, Peoples even on the Baltic Sea, so newer cultures, (In fact that area at an early time in it's history was almost progressing similar to other Atlantic coast cultures, but then the eastern invasions set that back). Some peoples are almost to the Middle East, which I think it is apparent are the ones having some of the worst problems with relegious and ethnic tollerances. I can't explain to anyone in full what the roots of that are, so I fall back on the notion that their cultural foundations are very old, and updating is very hard for them.
Similarly, Russia should have some patience from us. Crimea was a very special situation, where they could not afford to be muscled out of their military positions at this time.
As for the Ukraine, I am guessing the Putin wants as much influence there as is practicle and does not cause problems, but I think he most likely wants to settle for not much more than that.
But we are far apart as types, so it could turn out I don't understand.
But I would make the point that at one point Chile, obtained the sea coast from Bolivia, and Bolivia still wants it back, but still our interest is in encouraging both Chile and Bolivia to be more representative in their government methods.
Similarly, our interest is in representative government in all locations of Russia and Ukraine, within the limits of our properly used influence. Who owns what is of a secondary importance.
Actually like you just the way you are cousins. Good to remind us of our failures/falling short of the glory and that. Really, thanks. But get real. Dead is dead. The planet is not radioactive. (Yet)
The Nazi plan was to make a superman by limiting the gene pool. Supposing that a previous glorious type could be rescued from a mass of inferiors. They apparently believed in genetics as supreme.
The Soviets believed like so many that the human mind is a "Blank" slate. You could just take anyone re-educate them and turn them into angles. They also believed in the superman composed of a mixture of gene pools, taking the best from each.
Both are wrong in my opinion in every way. Both end in a limited gene pool, and fail where adaptation is later required. Reality does not hold still for us. Both suppose that you could somehow arrive at a perfect person composed of the perfect genes to cope with the present situation.
The participants did great damage to their gene pools. And such arrogance, thinking that they could determine what a perfect being would be.
Everything they did was about alphas responding to limited understanding, and hoping to situate themselves and their descendants into a favorable future, but the future is always changing. Reality is only our calculations about what we sense is around us now, and falls far from what is to be.
Small world, atmosphere might transfer enough heat to the dark side to prevent atmospheric collapse from condensation.
I would also suggest a Dyson orbital segments sphere, where the orbital segments are composed of a framework suitable to extract energy from the solar wind and partially deflect it, and a window glass component would serve to further deflect the solar wind, and also serve as a lid on radiant heat. Ideally it would also rebound some molecules leaving the upper atmosphere back downward. The power harvested from the solar wind might be used to generate a magnetic field, or might be beamed downwards to the surface, or some of each. If this worked OK for Ceres, then perhaps Mars.
A melted surface however presents problems, were blocks of deep ice might float upwards if stimulated by a striking object, or a quake? Cities on the frozen dark side? A sea on the sunward side?
I would start by putting a iced over (And mechanically covered) lake in one of the dark polar craters. Run electric power lines in and grow food by any means suitable.
Water for that could come from Ceres perhaps.
That would leave most of the Moon mostly as is, and useful for what the Moon has to offer.
However if economics were to pressure for it, Callisto or comets would be another source of water of significance that you could get water from. However, I have trouble imagining that it would become a desired thing.
For a minimum effort extraction of materials from the moon, I guess I would speculate on a robotic tricycle. The rear two wheels have brakes, and the front wheel being a “Brush”. Under the tricycle would be slung a dust pan. The target would be Moon dust. The back end could have a balancing weight which would also be useful machinery, which could control the amount of force being imposed on the front wheel / circular brush.
As dust is considered a hazard to work on the Moon, the partial removal of it from a surface area would provide a bulk material to extract to orbit, and also a cleaner surface area to later place some machines of a speculated future activity. It would also provide scientific data, since the dust could be separated and examined in orbit, if that had some value, and the swept surface would expose rocks that could be examined robotically.
I presume the dust pan must be emptied somehow into a bin, the bin perhaps being picked up later by a hook on a lander of some sort. I choose not to dwell on the details, because there would be many variations that might work.
The value of the materials extracted would include Oxygen, and of course a spectrum of materials.
For magnetic materials not to be used to make machines, I suggest the Mond process be employed, and the liquid be channeled into an spray paint type of device that will spray it using pressurized heated gas, and an educator. The purpose would be to generate a fine powder with some magnetic properties.
Iron Pentacarbonyl as a liquid, and Nickel Pentacarbonyl perhaps.
Exposure to the atomizing hot gas should atomize the material and also convert it to tiny Carbonyl Iron/Nickel spheres.
I presume this would occur in a pressurized chamber, so as to be able to recycle the gasses.
Useful for;
Electronics
Powder Metallurgy
I am also interested in squirting it out of a mass driver as a powder mixed into a gas as a slurry. I have questions about the actual magnetic properties of the powder, and really have some ideas for the mass driver, but no set design. It would be nice to incorporate a introduction of a Oxidizer into the ejection process and so a dust explosive burn to add propulsion, but that could contradict or complicate the mass driver process.
Human visits necessary to the Moon to support the extraction process would have to be paid for by an actual value of it. If that money equation proved true, then I don’t have a problem visualizing a device being built and contracted for hire by some company or national entity.
The value of ejecting fine dust might be that the solar wind, or the Earths magnetic field might act to eventually sweep the dust from the area of it’s ejection, which I suppose might be a good thing.
I also have my eye on Phobos and Demos, and also 16 Psyche (Big chunk of Iron/Nickel)
As for the energy for the propulsion device, I suppose variations. I am not against fission nuclear.
New Horizons and beyond?
Baby Steps.
http://phys.org/news/2014-06-hubble-plu … ssion.html
So there might be additional targets up to 2026, and parts of the mission continue beyond that.
Well, I would not expose such personal details to those I do not trust willingly at all, but I did encounter a White Russian female at a place to eat. Boy was she a cutie. And then she waved to me as I left. Can't forget something like that. But in the end I consider that their is a limit to my foolishness. But yes what a seemingly wonderful person. Does that bother you? Don't let it bother you.
The Roman empire was likely the result of peoples who entered from Central Asia, which was the center of the Indo-European zone at that time. So success in Republics might be influenced by that process. They in fact were neither Western or Eastern. When the process became less influenced by Asia, it then degenerated.
The Romans like the Greeks before them became less and less a fraction of the population and instead became landlords, and imported labor from various places, for the part that we descend from they got them from Northern Europe. The Romans and those they allowed into their club became useless, only collecting "Rents". They abandoned their Gods and became their own highest power (They should have had AA). Their women stopped having children, and the men became more interested in boys. It is a form of self worship, where an older man has a psychic need to have a young boy in his life, to project himself into.
Anyway it was the same for the Greeks before them. The Spartans were still very good at fighting, but in the end they did not have enough Spartans to fight off the opposing armies.
When Europeans came to the Eastern locations of this country, they encountered a culture not that unlike some in East Asia. Further, a distance of time an space made it possible to diverge from the European cultures. Some of those cultures had flirted with representative government, and of those, the British who were also encountering contact from East Asia were more that way. With the exception of Iceland perhaps the more advanced in it. The Arctic ocean is by population more related to East Asia than to the Romans.
So yes when our government was set up, there were camps which wanted to be a Roman Empire, but there was equally an influence from the local culture. And so it remains. But now because the latest arrivals tried to make us too Roman, the situation is responding by the reemergence of East Asia.
There is the Roman "West" and the Atlantic West. I am an Atlantic Westerner, but I value what the heritage of Rome has to offer.
As for the Russians, see it from their view. They abut some of the old civilizations that are degenerate, and they abut some of the Atlantic cultures which are relatively new. Our leadership came there with their out of balance time sensitive success story from here and tried to impose it on them. The cloths did not fit them well, and they would rather wear something more comfortable that will suit the climate that they live in.
Having said that I would not hesitate to say that their are major trust issues. If they become too full of themselves they will in turn try to make us wear cloths that do not suit our situation.
And I might hope that they will not squander their energy on useless retaliations, or silly adventures that will gain them nothing in the end.
As for America, actually we are just were we want to be. Soon we will have reasonable means to counter the excessive resort to archaic Roman methods that have overly been imposed on us.
Antius,
I enjoyed your post. There are many ways to cook an egg. Those in the UK and Europe might prefer one approach, we, and others something else.
I encourage Tom, because he tries a different method. That at the very least will expose it to testing. (As you have done).
Musk, I believe was not emerged from my local tribe, but he brings something very useful which is what I prefer to encourage.
It is interesting you and your kind seem to have this desire to take an object such as an asteroid or comet and turn it into a very long voyage spaceship. I have seen similar from your corner of the world before.
I was a Moon bug, and still am to a minor extent. I do not think we should ignore the Moon. However, having been informed of the heavy water concentrate on Mars, and the probability of Lithium salt concentrations on Mars due to its wetter past, I have upgraded my thinking about the potential for humans to settle Mars, and for Mars to become an important link in a progression towards adjacent star systems.
For Alpha-Centauri I hold out the hope for a Titan to Earth+ size world with a Nitrogen dominated atmosphere somewhere from 2.0 AU from the binary star out to the point where a Nitrogen atmosphere would collapse from the cold. That would be out to approximately Titan or a little colder.
Titan would then be the most rational playground to experiment with setting up a "Civilization" which might maintain youthful cultural capability for some time before its inhabitants degenerate into a post civilized insectoid nature.
"Specialization is for insects". Heinlein
Your idea might be modified where you find an object in an elliptical orbit and sort it's materials, and leave the "Tailings" behind, and construct a transit device from what you were going to take with you. Of course you were going to eject some of the materials for propulsion, so that's not much of a deviation.
But with that we begin to converge. Having done it that way, and then entering the new system if you could converge with a comet of that system, then you would have resupply for expansion. But this time you would modify the tailings into an impact object. Changing course to pass by the cold Nitrogen dominated world, and impacting it with the tailings, so as to elevate it's temperature temporarily. At the same time leaving behind some persons to land and take advantage of that to set up a hardened base of operations that could function in the resuming cold climate, but which would release the super greenhouse gasses that have been discussed at this site.
This could be a plan if either the Oort cloud only goes out 1 light year or merges with that of the adjacent star.
Of course the plan could also have automated probes that go ahead of it, and maybe even some small crews who arrive prior to the impact object. That might be the case if it had safe havens of some type of a natural sort.
For instance I have speculated on what would have happened to Venus if it had been ejected to the outer solar system after having had it's run-away greenhouse effect.
Likely, it would cool, and start with a CO2 ocean, and then a frozen ocean of CO2 topped with perhaps a thick Nitrogen atmosphere which would not freeze if it never cooled below 70 K at the bottom?
Then likely comets would impact and add water. Eventually the crust would be lubricated with water, and moving plates would develop like for Earth. The CO2/H20 ice layers would split at the bottoms of the "Oceans", and if the movement of the split were sufficient, then glaciation would not be able to envelop the split and something like the Mid Atlantic rift would be exposed to the atmosphere, and of course volcanism, and hot spots. Where plates dive under each other the ices would pile up and cover underground liquid pockets. With earthquakes this should be released periodically, and just perhaps produce catastrophic floods which might deliver a flow to the base of the volcanic "Mid Atlantic" zone. So, maybe even hot springs in places. So if that existed, then there might be a Oasis that would favor an early habitation of such a world with or without an impactor process.
I think that fusion rockets will come first.
Without rude intent.
Other societies contain the descendants of restless peoples. Perhaps North America, Austrailia, etc.
I would think that with the foundations in place interstellar travel could be an occurance for parts of the human race.
The foundations might start with Mars.
https://gsa.confex.com/gsa/2013AM/webpr … 32930.html
http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996/9079.aspx
If Mars did have flowing water, then it is reasonable that Lithium salts have been disolved from the general rocks, and deposited as evaporates in certain locations. Previosly it was mentioned that Mars appears to have 5 times the heavy water concentration that Earth does. All of this contributes to the notion that for energy Mars might like Fusion.
As for Lithium elsewhere in the solar system, perhaps Ceres has lithium in the surface deposites? Perhaps it had an ocean and disolved Lithium from the rocks, and then as the outer layers of ice evaporated, it left behind clay like deposites which might contain lithium? Maybe Ceres has concentrated heavy water as well?
Anyway supposing that fusion rocket propulsion made the solar system accessable out to Pluto, then there would almost certainly be some small groups that would choose to extend to objects out to the Oort cloud. By then those humans would be adapted to that environment, and would not think it strange to jump to another Oort cloud around an adjacent star.
Although it is not confirmed some speculation would have it that the Oort clouds go all the way out. That is Alpha Centauri would occasionally exchange objects with Sol. In that case there might not have to be a classical high speed crossing over light years of distance, but simply a constant even progression.
As you know I have no real poetry.
But I am watching to learn a bit if possible.
I will be a retired man not too long from now.
I will be looking for things to dabble in.
So thanks for being here to show something different.