You are not logged in.
I do believe it, I am sure I was exposed to the concept as a child.
The whole idea has no element without presidence. I did think at one point that I had created the idea of poking the arm out into a alien environment, but then later remembered that I had been previously exposed to this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Lethbridge
He did not have the technology that we do or I suppose he might have been able to do it better.
His challenge was actually worse though because the low pressure was to be in the capsule, and having higher pressure outside the barrel, caused his circulation to be cut off in his arms. He almost died several times. with the device, but made it work. But it was so long ago!
Anyway, one add on I think I could propose is that the arm ports should be put into a flanged part that would fix on the wall of the capsule.
The arm fixture that plugs into the port might stick at some time (although I would hope that it could be made better so that it does not). But Murphy's law being what it is, it needs to be possible to depressurize the capsule and undo the flange from the wall, if it did.
I would hate to think of someone stuck somehow in that fashion in the machine without a method of extraction except a cutting torch.
I am glad you see some utility for the methods.
Peas on the World of Mars, and goodnight.
Well I appreciate your reply and am intimidated also. (By your credentials) I had to read twice. It seemed that you were a bit harsh at first which is uncharacteristic of you, but on the second reading I was more comfortable.
I agree that for Mars the points you have made are very strong. MCP suits would be a very good choice for early and later generalized work.
But I will argue my case for using what I proposed on worlds that are not as Earth like as Mars first, and then I will try to make a weaker case for the use of it on Mars.
As for evaporation cooling on dry worlds, that would be something to want to avoid I think.
For instance the Moon. Although you could get water from the poles, or perhaps in some other way, you would not want to squander it, except for special cases where what I propose as a suit simply will not do.
I agree I don't like the classic bag suits.
I would not actually like to begin the use of what I propose on either the Moon or Mars, because of gravitation, and the fact that such a device would be heavy, requiring strong motors to manipulate. Balance beam concepts would reduce the amount of lifting force required however, if possible to implement.
I do like it to begin with on the international space station, or a small world like Phobos. It largely allows the recycling of consumables.
If you see space walks with bag suits on the in Earth obit, they are for limited duration, are dangerous, and require a large degree of autonomous life support.
But we do see people in bag suits, attached to robotic arms doing tasks.
And without MCP suits, I guess it still makes better sense than what I propose because most of the tasks are one of a kind with scientific equipment. I am not saying that some of it could not be done with what I propose, but not enough of it can be yet.
Supposing it were developed (Existed) and you wanted to set up some kind of a materials processing facility at a location in a vacuum environment. Perhaps Moon or asteroid materials in a "L" location. You have a choice of bringing the materials into a large pressurized "Factory" or having a open vacuum factory.
If on the outside of your factory you had "Capsules" anchored on rails or robotic arms, then you can present the capsule to a work point. The human then uses whatever arms he/she has to manipulate a object to achieve a purpose. The capsule has far more consumable resources available than a person in a space suit. For instance they have electrical power from the mother object. They may have a Oxygen line in some cases, or be able to refill at certain locations. As for heat, a larger object will suffer less severe consequences than a person in a suit from thermal variations. Also having electrical power in relative abundance, the capsule could be heated by it when cold. Otherwise it could be quite reflective so as not to heat up too much in the sunlight.
CO2 could be recaptured and returned to the mother object for reprocessing.
Such an environment might be suitable for trying the method. Radiation will be a problem. But suppose the capsule weremade of Aluminum, and lined with Paraffin wax? That might help, and there could also be provision for a shielded garage which may or may not be practical. A person in a autonomous space suit would be even more at risk however they might resort to a garage and airlock escape from radiation storms, but would not have all that much protection from typical radiation.
Impacting objects could be an issue. If someone is in a suit, I think chances are they are dead in such an event, but perhaps this is also a case where the MCP suit gives a better chance of survival than a bag suit. A capsule offers a possible improvement however for that problem.
Phobos/Demos:
This thread is about Phobos though, and so I will stop there next. I saw an opportunity to find a better environment on tiny worlds for this, and Phobos or Demos seem to be the most local of opportunities.
There is the question of resources. The moons may not be suitable if they are truly lacking of critical ones. Then it would be necessary to go to the asteroid belt to do this thing. That seem unattainable at this point without first establishing a starting point nearer to Earth. But the future belongs to the people who will be there. It will almost certainly be different from what we have now.
Anyway, for a world like Phobos, the mother device would be mobile on the surface of the object, and would have child devices "Capsules" below it.
They also would draw electrical power from the mother device, and would very likely have hoses supplying Oxygen from it and have a return line for CO2.
Being below the mother device, they would be in a modified environment. It would have significant protection from radiation, be more thermally constant, and have the possibility of overhead lighting from the mother ship, so they would not be dependent on sunlight for vision. If reasonable, additional protection could be added by placing flexible stips of skirting around the perimeter of the mother device almost down to the ground level. But that would be a preferred add on, not a necessity.
Presuming that the mother device could gather soil and rocks, and could convert those into useful objects, the people in the capsules could assemble those components into a larger structure on Phobos, perhaps a strip of solar panels with two or more power buses. The task would be redundant. The mother device moving forward at a very slow speed could extract power from the power buses for the whole operation. There would be a large degree of protection from impacting objects.
The Capsule/Suit:
I feel that I may need to explain better what I am saying when I say the person in the capsule would be in a bag suit. The part of the body and head inside of the capsule would perhaps be inside of a minimal suit. It would not normally be pressurized relative to the pressure of the capsule, and would be cooled by a air pump/cooling fan if needed exchanging air between the suit and the capsule. In fact, if desired the heaters in the capsule would be turned off to make the interior cool/cold, and the bag suit might serve to keep the person more comfortably warm.
Check valves would protect the human from sudden decompression of the capsule. (If maintained properly).
As for the arm projected outside of an arm port, that arm/glove bag would only be pressurized during the insertion of the arm or the extraction of the arm. When the arm was pulled back into the capsule, the arm port door could be closed, but the arm/glove bag would add protection from capsule decompression if the port door did not seal properly.
To insert, first the suit is put on, emergency bag suit and helmet for the most of the body, and MCP method for the arm. After checking that the glove had maintained pressure properly, the port door would be opened. If depressurization happened at this point from a glove failure, the person is already in a full emergency suit that should allow them to survive the event. The arm is inserted, and a fixture on the upper arm docks with the port opening sealing it. Then the arm/glove has the air pumped out of it and into the capsule. The person may be able to put both arms out, and then after the depressurization of the arm/glove, may take off the glove(s).
My preference however would be to put one dominant arm out, and for the other arm have a hard arm that the other arm could be inserted into, that having a mechanical method for the hand and arm to open and close a exterior mechanical hand, perhaps as simple as a clamp, or perhaps more sophisticated. It would be modeled off of very deep sea diving suits.
The intent would be to use that hand to hold objects to be worked on by the other hand. Most people are right handed, so in many cases the arm/glove hand would be the right hand, and the hard suit arm would be the left one. It would be desired that the person could extract their left hand and arm from that apparatus at any time desired.
They could operate a keyboard. They also may be able to eliminate waste without extracting the right arm from the process, but that would be tricky business. With other suits you just have to go in your pants. However it would not be that much of a problem to remove the right arm from the Arm/bag suit, if you had to go #2. I presume that #1 can be handled that way or perhaps with some type of elaborate duct work device. I would like to suppose the person would extract both of their arms every two hours, and take care of eating, and eliminating waste, and then go back to work. A coffee break so to speak.
The MPC arm may or may not get too uncomfortable under air pressurization, so I have suggested a small vacuum chamber in the capsule to relieve that problem as desired.
It would be tied to the system that pulls the air out of the arm/glove device. Neither one would be intended to be vented to space vacuum.
Mars:
I did mention Mars briefly, said that it is what I originally thought this up for. It has less potential there, other solutions may often be better.
However I will make a special case for working on a pipeline or even more a power line. Those being on the ground, would allow this to be rather simple. You would be in a wheeled mobile device, and your arm ports would be on the bottom within reach of the ground (That's easy to say). It would likely need some type of elevation control at least for rough ground. It could roll up to the habitat when it's tour of duty was done, and could dock with it and allow the person to be extracted into the habitat. Or the person might be able to use the emergency pressure suit to make the exchange, but that would be for "emergencies".
On Mars the mother device and child device method will be less successful You could have a large cart with large solar arrays on it, but then it would make things more clumsy.
I do offer an improvement over other methods for the case of chemical contamination. I do know that for the MCP suit coveralls are proposed to help control that problem.
But if the person in this apparatus is never actually outside and had not either taken of their glove to touch objects, and if a successful docking to the habitat without resort to the emergency suit method was done, then the contamination problem would be very low. Granted, the air lock might have some residue on it,
Anyway, presuming you have actually read this very long reply, I have nothing but good intentions in doing this. Not trying to rock the boat.
I do understand that what will actually be done is much less than what could be done, but there are far more fantastic ideas floating around this site I think.
But maybe it is an honor to even be noticed ![]()
The wet process you suggested with water cleaning is just as good to consider as any other, the same for the sponge stick.
I rather don't like that one, the sponge stick, but with updating, perhaps it could be helpful. A personal one for each member I hope. And some method to sterilize it?
A water budget is a factor. Mars offers more chances on that than other reachable places in space. I guess each technology will perhaps advance over time, and choices will be made on what is prudent for the situation that may exist in a settlement.
As for devoting a greenhouse to growing toilet paper, I will counter argue (If we don't discuss things, this site will get pretty dead). But let me know if you are tired of me an my antics, and I will either try to modify my ways, of just go. (Without bitterness).
So my argument would continue as follows.
If you can build greenhouses and have enough materials and time and energy to build more than the minimum needed for crops, why not do so?
I have not seen a reasonable proposal for a substitute for wood, except perhaps bamboo, which is a wonderful plan if you can do it. Again it would be nice to be able to build lots of greenhouse space, if economics permitted it. I would hope for a rich population If so, what would they want? If poor, then choices have to be made.
So, I don't have an ideal plant in mind, but I will propose rhubarb. It has some vitamins but is not a particularly high gain food. As I have said I am using it for a proxy for a hoped for more useful plant. But I need to start with something.
So, you are growing rhubarb, which is fairly rugged. If you could remove the non cellulose content, perhaps the leaves would be useful for a paper towel substitute. People will have to blow their noses at least and they would need to wipe things up. What I propose is rather wimpy for the task but it is not worthy of having a pillow put over it's head and suffocated just yet. I hope for something much better.
I know that cloth items that would be washed are also proposed for those tasks. But then there is a washing cost. But maybe it is a good way.
Anyway, if your intention was to grow a plant that could produce a wood substitute product, then you have that, and you also have a pseudo paper product. You have generated Oxygen, and parts of the plant are food.
But I want to be specific that I am not wild about rhubarb as the plant, I just wanted a symbolic place marker for the item that I hope exists.
I might also suggest that if you could harvest the chloroplasts from the "Rhubarb", and so some of the things with that that have been proposed for peas, then you got something else as well. Was that you RobertDyck? I am not all that sharp about assigning credit where it belongs.
I might finally say that if a Roman Sponge Stick is OK (And I think it could be), then making a wood substitute, perhaps a low grade pseudo particle board from pseudo "Paper" that was used for body and house cleaning is not necessarily out of the question. I do believe a reasonable sterilization could be accomplished.
But I am not ever going to Mars, so I guess all of this will be a Martians choice in the end.
I suppose I could add a few things.
You could take you bag glove off and then touch things with just your counterpressure protected fingers. That will reduce the amount of safety.
I also favor various configurations. Usually people use one hand to grip and object and another to work tools and parts.
So, I actually think the best mode would be to have only one arm out, and to have the other inside manipulating a mechanical arm. That may or my not involve electric power. It could be strictly mechanical with the inside arm manipulating a mechanical gripper arm outside. This then leaves the person free to do keyboarding on the inside, and to perhaps eat, and if needed attend to body functions, even though that will be a bit hard.
You could also have three arms or four. A mechanical vice arm. A voice operated motorized arm. 1 or two actual protected human arms projecting outside.
And I did actually think this thing up with Mars itself in mind. However the gravity field of Mars being much stronger, it will be harder to do.
Another feature is that if for some reason you wanted to pressurize the box with outside gasses on Mars, you could the person would be in a suit. This would add significant danger, and would make eating a problem, but a well designed suit might allow you to drop them and do #1 or #2 even in that case. I don't know why you would want to do it except then the box is a airlock, you are already in your suit with oxygen, you can just unhook, and depressurize the box, open a single door, and go outside if there is a reason.
So, it could have many modes of operation.
For one thing I think it could be good for constructing solar panel arrays, since for it to operate you would have to have a cart with a lift anyway.
It could also be good for installing and repairing pipelines on the ground, and power lines which might also be on the ground.
It would reduce slip and fall injuries, and would allow EVA's to be longer with some added comfort and reduced use of airlocks on your main hab.
But the potential for crush injuries would be a safety issue that would have the be well though out.
How do you rescue a person who has had their projecting arm crushed? How do you prevent it from happening at all?
I hope I don't annoy you jumping on your threads all the time.
Anyway, if I had to try to solve the problem, I would have a 2nd floor overhang projecting from the shelter on stilts.
Under that I would have a set of three "Drums". This projection would point towards a pole. I am presuming the shelter would be in a temperate zone location.
The drums would hold full air pressure (We hope) along with the rest of the shelter. Being in the shadow of the shelter, I expect the drums to persist at temperatures well below the freezing point of water.
Above each drum inside the shelter, a lid, and some method of a toilet seat. For good measure, the seats should be capable of vacuum integrity. Should a drum rupture, and the lid be closed, it should have high probability of holding air pressure against any vacuum appearing in a drum.
1) Drum 1 would be where you did your urination. Your urine would freeze and so be stored, and to a small degree sterilized by ice crystals.
2) Drum 2 would be where you drop the big ones. (Use a hoist if necessary).
A freezing process to partially sterilize and make quiet organic decomposition. Reducing bad odors to a minimum.
3) Drum 3 would be between the two, and would be where you drop your "paper" waste.
At some point the drums are sufficiently filled to require a altered process. I do not want anything requiring lifting dirty heavy things. That could be messy and could cause back injuries, or if you use pipes for water based fluids, you are then getting into lots of complications, except during a relatively brief period when you may finally empty them.
So, you have to have at least one alternate set of such drums for use while you are dealing with the frozen wastes in the 1st set.
You put a thermally insulating wall around the 1st floor enclosure, attached to the stilts that hold up the 2nd floor. You heat that enclosure by some means, thawing the contents of each drum. (The lids are firmly closed).
For drum 1, I think that then you can extract Ammonia, which would result from the breakdown of urine. Urine is typically not very infectious. Secondary sterilization could be considered however, perhaps a UV light. Or maybe you can think of something else. After that you have to either have a tank on a wheeled cart to suck the residual fluids into, or a established pipeline. You dump the residual fluids to whatever thing you want to. Perhaps you use it in agriculture, or you squirt it outside.
For Drum 2, I would go ahead and try to establish a digestive process that consumes the human organic matter in the waste paper, feces, mucus, etc, but largely leaves the cellulose alone. This could be without Oxygen, producing some Methane, or with Oxygen if that is more suitable. After it is processed, you vacuum out the water content as vapor, and dispose of it or condense it for watering a garden. Perhaps during the drying process a low level of heat would be used to help sterilize it. When the left overs are
dry they will be less obnoxious to the hab environment and can be taken out for further recycling. Perhaps if necessary back to paper, or my preference would be to make some kind of particle board out of it.
For Drum 3, your standard process of digestion without Oxygen, producing Methane. When that is done, again drawing out the vapors of water, and applying a low level of sustained dry heat. At that point the digested dried residual will be less obnoxious, and again someone would have to basically scoop it out, and if it is sterile enough, it goes to a garden. Alternately if they want to they can try to pump it out as a fluid, but spills would be obnoxious, and cleanup of a spill would be a burden, especially on paper products.
For paper, I think most of us who have been in the woods and have an emergency, have used leafs on some occasion. It does not work that well. However, if a plant of suitable character could be found, and the leafs treated to remove the non-cellulose part of the leafs, perhaps that could work. They would be producing Oxygen, paper product (Sort of), and ultimately that would be converted into some type of particle board like product (Perhaps).
I have a deep respect for all your opinions. If we were in power and had to make a choice now for a mission now. I would step back and not argue with you at all.
But it is a characteristic of "Advanced" animals/humans to play. So, I am playing.
http://www.universetoday.com/114871/mak … on-phobos/
They make an argument that NASA is sort of heading in such a direction anyway. I share your views that this might not have been the correct path, but it is the investment they have made. If possible, it would be good to utilize what they can provide (If it helps).
Phobos may be hydrated down deeper, but the surface is not so at all. As Antius has said, there is likely ejected materials from Mars mixed in with the surface of Phobos.
I state that I think that Phobos should have at least one unpersoned probe go to it before a human mission. If such a probe can reasonably determine it's probable potential and it is a negative report then Phobos can be eliminated completely from the competition. If samples can be returned then some information from Mars would also be gained I think.
If somehow there would be a positive report, then it is not unreasonable to ask if Phobos can be considered as part of a plan.
There are four reasonable contenders for human expansion into space I think. One has to exist, that is Earth to orbit, which we have and it seems SpaceX might make better.
Subsidiary plans are Moon and/or small asteroid capture to Earth orbit, Mars, Phobos and/or Demos.
NASA is not going to the Moon in any significant way, but says it will try to capture a small rock and visit it with humans. Some companies say they want to do similar,but perhaps with automation.
Japan wants to go to the Moon it seems, or at least someone in Japan wants that.
Many of us would like to see an experiment with a centrifuge in orbit on animals and humans. I suggest Mars level gravitation.
The some want to make a pseudo Star Treck Enterprise ship with a centrifuge process.
Some want to go to the Asteroid belt, and some want to establish a presence on Mars, or at least have humans visit it.
Some do not want humans to set foot on Mars for contamination reasons.
Some who it does not profit to work with simply want the human race stay here and serve them as servants.
Some who want to find life on Mars are simply interested, some want to dispute the foundations of religion. (Part of their plan to be god and be served I think).
Various pressures exist most of them favor some kind of expansion into space. Some will achieve some of these things regardless of what we want or do. So it is perhaps worth considering if most of these desires can be connected into a greater plan that most might accept.
If someone goes to Mars, fine. But until then, I suggest thinking about the possibility of a centrifuge device that would work in both microgravity and on the surface of small objects such as Phobos or a small asteroid.
I suggest low Earth orbit, the saucer plan from the Trekkies @ .38 gee.
Perhaps Space X can lower prices, or perhaps small asteroids are captured by then. Or maybe Japan or others are on the Moon by then. Resources to build it from that?
You want the data for centrifuges anyway for humans. And you also want to confirm that Mars gravity is enough anyway.
If Phobos is a valuable resource, and if the saucer technology is done in low Earth orbit, then how would you get it to Phobos? It has been suggested ion thrusters, which makes sense. However if it is saucer shaped can you also consider aerocapture to Mars orbit to help?
If the saucer were on the Mars facing side of Phobos, it would already have some radiation protection from two directions. In the beginning of habitation small storm shelters could be lined with soil from the outside to supplement this. Later the whole top surface could be protected in a similar fashion, and of course Phobos would offer protection to the underside.
Then there is the question of EVA's. A suit designed to be autonomous with it's own resources, is quite a challenge. I prefer a tethered approach.
The saucer in low Earth orbit would allow this and would allow resources from small captured asteroids or the Moon or from Earth to be manipulated. Mostly all of this is upside. However there would be a potential for an increase of crushing crushing events, but safety measures should be able to address those dangers.
Similarly, the underside of such a saucer on Phobos would provide a sheltered and tethered EVA potential.
Manipulation of materials could be done by robot arms, and suited humans and a combination of both.
I suggest that a long term suit be contemplated, that a person could be in for perhaps a week at a time. This would be a box on a manipulator arm, with some emergency supplies in the case where the tethered resource supplies (Hoses wires) failed.
I suggest a combination arm method where at the upper arms would be a triple seal. A simple representation of that would be you are in a bag suit, but your arms are in counterpressure apparatus. Around the transition point on the upper arms you have a cork stopper (This is for visualization only, I would expect something much more sophisticated).
Your long term suit is a box on a robot arm, it has ports for the arms that the "Corks" can be pushed into for a seal. So your arms (Or I prefer your best arm only) are outside of the box. But this is not so stupid if you also put a bag suit for the arms on the outside also joined. So your arms are in a pressurized bag suit and also inside of counterpressure suiting for the arm. Then unfortunately your circulation will be cut off if you don't depressurize the arm bags. So you do depressurize them You pump the air from these arm bags into the box you are in. Now you have your counterpressure protected arms in a vacuum.
There is an inconvenience involved, certainly you now have both the counterpressure arm covering and the depressurized bags around the arms, to impede your sense of touch and your grip. But you are not fighting to clench your hands against the pressure of a bag suit. During work with your arm(s) deployed, you are in the bag suit protected by it, and you are also having your arms protected by the counterpressure measures. You are also protected by the box and the bag arm/gloves. So you have double pressure protection.
Arm retraction:
In an emergency it might be possible to pull the cork out pull your arm into the box, if the cork were designed well. Then you would have to hope the arm/bag did not burst from sudden pressurization. However the ports that you put your arm through could also have hinged spring loaded doors that would shut. I even if the box depressurized, you would still be in your hybrid bag suit and it might keep you alive.
But for normal arm retraction you would simply repressurize the arm bags, and pull your arm(s) out, and the port doors would spring shut. (The arm/glove bags should still protect the pressurization of the box even if the doors fail.
So, you have retracted because you want to eat something or preform a body function, or go to sleep or you don't have a useful task to preform "Outside". Before you compromise your hybrid suit, you latch the port doors down.
Then you are inside, but unless you doff your arm counterpressure part of the suit pretty soon your circulation will be cut off. So you have one or two vacuum chambers that you can insert one or more of your arms into (Inside of the box), on a periodic basis, you do your body function, or eat, or take a break or you take your whole suit off for the night and get some sleep until the next work period.
And that is I think how humans could make it in such environments, and do useful work and have significant protection from harm. Obviously after a week the person should be rotated back to the saucer and do centrifuge therapy.
I think I did OK ![]()
Hey GW!
Yeah, I have argued a best case for Phobos because Antius asked about it.
If we were actually sending a mission somewhere, the moral issues would be very high at this point, but we are a long way from that.
I do not anticipate the utilization of ices of Phobos real or imagined for a crew living in a "Zadanga" type giant mobile pseudo robotic horseshoe crab robot on Phobos.
I expect that there could be some reachable soil that may have small chemically bonded materials of value. Otherwise the surface materials are rather reduced by spluttering from the solar wind I believe. That itself may not be a bad thing.
So speculating on this plan, you have to weigh if going to the Moon makes more sense for the human race or going to Mars, or this thing?
I do think this. There are supposedly four types of human power. Priests, Warloads, Aquisitioners, and Intellectuals. For my money I think people very often make a mistake on what an intellectual actually is. But that is just another funny issue.
Drawing the interest of the maximum amount of potential contributors may be the best plan. For the Moon, yes there is a logic, which would eventually get the human race out all over the solar system. However many of our population have the diligence of a 3 year old towards concepts of the betterment of the human race, or they actually want to feed off of the human race, don't particularly want it to advance at all.
The Moon as a starting point may be too abstract because all most people can see is a bunch of dry rocks with an unfriendly environment.
Mars? Some people do not want us to go to Mars. Some because they would rather we clean their windows or bring them a hot toddy (For very low wages, or no wages at all).
Some because they have a compulsive obsessive problem that they project onto Mars, supposing that humans are dirty and will contaminate it. (Actually not all together wrong).
Some see that there are alien cultures that want us to serve them hot toddies, and clean their windows for free, so they want military hardware to prevent that.
Mars is a hard nut technically but also socially.
But if you can have a method to utilize to inhabit small worlds that cannot possibly foster life, and you can deliver reduced materials (Metals, Silica) back to Earth orbit), you might please the vast majority of factions, except the ones who hate you no matter what because you did not really want to be their free dinner.
Mars does have deep deposits of ice. I guess not where pathfinder was as you have told me.
But here is the deal the imagination of some humans is on this pseudo star trek thing, with the artificial gravity. If you could adapt that to tiny worlds like Phobos, and indeed have a protected underside like a horseshoe crab, where materials could be processed as previously spoken (I do have a different spacesuit concept that will suit this thing very well I think). Then if it builds a solar array with significant wattage on Phobos, it can not only assist the push to Mars itself, but might indeed clone itself, and not only that make a saucer section (Artificial gravity) which could be hooked up to a propulsion device, a propulsion device that could move that clone to an asteroid.
So, this concept goes beyond Mars and to Mars. It is worth more time and words I think.
The initial query was should Phobos come before Mars.
The surface of Phobos appears to be dry. Specualtion has it that there could be ice inside.
Any moving material from Phobos to another location would likely involve rocket engines which need fuel.
Putting the soil into a Bin, and transporting the bin would involve some diffaculty. For instance if you stand on it with a shovel, how well is that going to work?
However create a base on it of the structure that has been previously proposed. It is anchored by gravitation due to it's mass. It provides humans with Earth like protections inside, and and improved environment under it. Under the bottom where the four wheels could be.
If robotic arms would then dig soil, they would be attached to the bottom of the device and could do their work. Perhaps a clam shell type shovel on a robot arm.
If humans deploy outside under the device but above the surface of Phobos, actually perhaps they are attached to a robot arm, like the Canada arm, and also have electric, Oxygen, and so on consumbles supplied to them through flexible wires/hoses. Perhaps the CO2 can be recycled.
What might the humans be doing there since a robot arm makes more sense for digging?
They might be constructing a long array of solar cells. The base rolls forward. The arm digs dirt. The dirt is processed. Solar cells made, power busses made. The human goes outside in a suit on a boom, and assembles an extension of the solar cell array with power busses, so that the base can draw power from the solar array. Eventually Phobos is a big solar power supply.
It is possible that some of the dug dirt will give sufficient Hydrogen when heated to supply water for the humans. It is less likely that it would provide large amounts for fuels.
Eventually if the solar power system did become built, and there was ice inside of Phobos, it could be reached.
It's not a bad plan.
Easier to get to than Mars, but would likely make Mars accessible eventually, while allowing the search for life on Mars to continue while the infrastructure of Phobos was being built up.
Might be more bite sized than our Moon actually. Providing similar resources, while allowing it to be a base for scientific research of Mars. Also samples from Mars are there.
A convergence of space interests is possible with Phobos. Money, Science, protect Mars from contamination. Might be able to get some conllection of entities to go for it. Not so much for other schemes I think.
That's a nice add on. Wheels.
I especially like the mobile sheltering effects of a gap between the surface of phobos, and the mobile base above them.
They would be sheltered from radiation to a large extent.
Sheltered from micrometeorites to a large extent.
Be sheltered from temperature extremes to a large extent.
So the suits could be simplified to a degree.
With a tether, on board life support for the suits could be minimized, and a power line provide energy to a battery pack in the suit from the mobile base.
Also it would be likely that an airlock door to jump into if the suit malfunctions, would be in close proximity most of the time.
Also there could be overhead lighting for performing the work. It would be like having a giant garage under it where you could work on things. For instance while some parts of the surface could be a stip mine, other parts could be a strip of solar cells. The habatat would move over it slowly while it was being referbished or orignally built.
Just me, but I think for having off Earth significant mass to deal with are; 1) Moon, 2) Mars, 3) Phobos and/or Demos, 4) Asteroid belt.
As silly as my post seemed, I actually was serious. I think a mobile giant robot of that sort, a mobile base would be the thing for a small body like that.
If it's legs kept it a few feet above the surface, then it's robitic arms/scoops could work with devices on the surface, and also scoop up mass into the base. Also teathered humans in suits could work underneith it, be protected from most of the radiation by being between the mobile base, and Phobos, and the get inside and have the artificial gravitation.
If the issue of water were solved, then you would have security for humans in space, mass accessible to make machines from, and a rather small gravity well to transport manufactured materials out of, to other locations in the solar system, including Mars.
Ok, I can't help myself.
How about a giant robotic crab walking around on that moon, with a artificial gravity ring inside of it;
http://www.buildtheenterprise.org/gravity-wheel
Then of course it could have double walls, with soil materials from the moon filling the gap, providing radiation protection.
Water? That's a question mark.
I have a special spacesuit notion that might also help, but later with that I think
I am sorry if I am getting all over everything just now. I keep planning to go away actually.
Well, my words come at a low price. I guess you get what you pay for. ![]()
I seem to recall that Elon Musk might think that a dome with water in it, water mined was a plan. (My best memory of a vague article).
So, he must not be thinking equator.
Anyway I hope someone like him is able to bend the rules, and get more to Mars cheaper. Then maybe not everyone on Mars has to start off as a ice age Morlock. There can be the Eloy ![]()
Seriously. I prefer a better plan than what I can make.
As groups humans tend to be insane and stupid, with occasional lucid moments. So I have a need to agree with you. If we ever catch the human race in a lucid moment, where they will contribute to and not damage a plan to go to Mars, it should be exploited. But such a lucid moment may not have much duration. And then as you have said the people on Mars will be on their own, or even worse have to fight off idiotic meddling from a Earth culture that has again lapsed into stupidity.
That is my opinion. That is why I try to go for the less glorious and less tra-la-la concepts of how humans can take root on Mars.
Well, I think it's a way off before any serious hardware will be created specific to a human occupation of any duration.
I think that in very old SciFi, I also noted references to occupation of a polar ice cap. I don't think the technical specifics were well defined.
It is not entirely a bad idea, but I would rather seek lower latitudes where possible where the thickness was sufficient. Can a counter pressured ice tunnel hold pressure without a supplemental lining? It might be tricky and risky. But any initial occupation will be short on resources desired from Earth. An ice tunnel would certainly give radiation protection, and to some extent moderate temperatures within. I am hoping that a high humidity would help to seal leaks, and that some ice layers would be very old and very stable not moving like a glacier.
So, I am looking for low hanging fruit at first.
In my attempt to justify myself, I recall that the orbiters can see where meteors have hit ice layers, and disturbed the layer of soil above. I know that with the present atmosphere, they don't slow down enough not to shatter if they strike ice free surface. Also, if they are of a significant size they are likely to melt and become embedded in rock/soil and so harder to extract. Of course I am wanting Iron/Nickle objects. But I speculate that such an object slowed a bit by the atmosphere and then striking a layer of ice perhaps 100, 200, 300 feet deep might distribute much of it's momentum by vaporizing ice and scattering it's shattered shards. It is also thought that periodically this ice layer is evaporated and moved to the equator, and then it comes back again. So if this were the pattern such Iron/Nickle objects might then lay on top of the ground, under the ice.
The environment might not be very reactive to them due to the lack of liquid water and the cold temperatures. So, I would hope that in selecting a site, such a set of objects would be found prior, magnetically.
Also, if a person wanted to wish for a generous situation, you might hope to actually have a worthwhile ore body of some kind identified within a reachable distance limit.
Blasting with explosives might not be friendly to a ice tunnel, so, I might hope it could be mined some other way. That could be a problem.
I have seen that it is proposed to extract Oxygen from atmospheric CO2, and that will also produce poisonous CO. However if that is further reacted with H2O, then Hydrocarbons. The wonderful tar I want, and presumably by default lighter oils and gasses. I would not feel that these would all have to be toxic to humans, but some toxic results would have to be handled. And so the Mushroom farms I have spoken of. If you have Oxygen, and a oil of some kind and some soil, then apparently you can hope to grow mushrooms, if you warm the mix up a bit. No lights needed except for planting, inspection, and harvesting. Natural mushrooms would be of some value. However, I should hope that some genetic engineering could produce varieties that have an expanded nutrition. That's a hope, not reality at this time.
Of course if you have a nuclear reactor and pressurized plant houses with artificial lights, you could also improve the diet (I think you would need some of that).
So, if this were done, your early skill set would begin to work metals, and would work stone, mostly under the ice. You would be reliant for the most part on nuclear reactor(s),
You would have Oxygen and Hydrocarbon production. You could grow some food from chemicals (Mushrooms), and some under artificial lights.
I would think your next move would be to develop the manufacture of plastics. Having that then you might have plastic liners for more ice tunnels (To expand space, and also perhaps get more meteor iron/nickle.
Obviously you should have sufficient water resources.
You might then consider having some surface greenhouses, but unless you could develop glass, the window method would be plastics, I suggest low pressures, balloons held inside of some kind of a mesh cage, and a "Tarp" sheet with UV protection over that as a start. They would obviously only operate in the summer. Further I am sure it would be good to have some small above ground habitats built at that point. Small windows, but a place where humans could get out of their suits, periodically, and be in the presence of growing things (In the summer I think).
As for glass, what would you suggest?
I don't trust ice or rock not to fall on my head, but I have proposed a plan where they can. Anyway, in Antarctica they do build tunnels that are somewhat stable over a lifetime or part of a lifetime. They usually put in supports, but Earth has 1 gee of gravitational force, Mars has 1/3. (More or less). Any initial habitation of Mars will be a nasty gamble. But maybe we can have odds on our side anyway.
So, If you have a tunnel system, to some extent, the pressurization of it may act against the warping of it, the deformation of the ice.
Rocks. they exist on Mars obviously. on the surface and perhaps at the bedrock level under the ice. If your floor of habitation is bedrock and you can find rocks to make walls with then you have bettered your situation. Now if you can make tar and mineral wool and so a analog of tar paper, can you make a roof on top of your rock walls? Above that perhaps an ice roof. Maybe you can give that ice roof some resistance from deformation by applying a frozen layer of mineral wool and frozen water, maybe. An arch formation may not hurt your purpose.
Anyway Ice, nuclear reactors, tar, mineral wool, and of course in the summer as you may be capable of, solar driven biological processes, solar driven power to expand your powers, and we might hope, the ability to master glass, metals, and plastics.
That's my best offer. If you have a better one, then good. I will praise you.
In this case they arrive in a summer to a very nasty place, but a place that has water and 2 to 3 small nuclear reactors.
Perhaps it would be wise if at least one nuclear reactor was on the surface to help them survive initially.
Their objective would be to burrow down 100 to 200 feet (Like mice) to get to the other one(s).
Ice may be more stable on Mars than Earth. The gravitation is 1/3 approximately, and the historical temperatures, the ambient is much lower at the places where large deposites exist.
A less mobile ice body. Less Mars quakes we hope as well.
Now, if they get down there, the floors of their habitation are rock. Some of my ancestors (And much earlier some of "Our" ancestors) lived in a home dug in the side of a hill). A dirt floor. They made it more or less, but moved on.
Building with rocks:
If you have a location under 100 to 200 feet of ice, and some nuclear reactors, you have chances on Mars I think.
When I got out of high school, I got a job working in a hematite processing plant. I never worked in a pit. Then I quit and went to two years of school, and worked in a Taconite plant for 10.5 years at some type of technical level. I have real experience. Not all of it but parts of it.
Pretty cool that hematite place. It was the precursor for tacnite processing. I also worked where they developed the technology for taconite. But I was not the inventor of any of it. I consider that I am rather priveleged however. Too bad I can't spell real good.
I am a bit bent just now, but I will try to behave.
However, I am certainly not the end of knowledge of the subject.
That's a pretty little girl in the pretty picture that you provided. I hope she does not end her life with a red foam coming out of her mouth and nose.
No time for good spelling just now. Wasn't made for it. Have concepts but communication is not my long suit.
First of all, people going from Earth to Mars to live will need a parent who will exist for a time we hope, that being the human effort on Earth to support the introduction of humans. No gaurantee that there will be more than one shot at it. Maybe not even that. If it happens, it has to count.
The tropics of Mars seems to indicate a merciful place, but as I see it habitation of it will require the mastering of stone, metals, glass and plastics.
Sure, if you can bring them in from Earth, if Earth will pay the bills, then you are champion. But I think it will be a long shot if humans even get a chance at Mars at all.
So, is there any other possibility? As I see it you have said nuclear reactor(s). Good. Mars is likely to be a killer world. Better be strong, better have a good plan that does not depend on favors from a world you don't really know very well.
So, here is a "Proposed" alternate plan:
Find a location where there is stable ice. A layer perhaps 100 to 200 feet deep (No time for metric just now). That's equivalant to a rough estimate of 900 to 1800 mb of potential counterpressure. Was it the pathfinder that pushed dust off of ice in a polar region? Well find what you want, drop 2 to 3 minimal sized nuclear reactors onto that location in fair proximity. Ideally they could melt their way to bedrock, but maybe that's not a real option. I hope it could be.
Now if desired they with robot abilities support a biological process either chemical driven by H2, O2, and perhaps CO2 (I hope) alternately or as a supplement, a light driven process in a melted environment under 100 t0 200 feet of ice, to provide some biomass and Oxygen in some manner, then bring in the humans.
Well, I maybe could be leading you astray from a clever plan. I would not want to be that person.
I think if it could prove true that you could pressurize a ice/Permafrost tunnel, and probability of security was on your side, then do that. But it must be tested.
Your technology as described spans the 21st century to Roman technology. (With added Inuit issues).
What I want to explore is 21st century to just better than mud huts.
If it proves to be stupid then let the judgement hold against it.
Any plan must actually work! Even I would not hold ego above preformance.
I would hope for a network of ice tunnels with a door that can be open or closed, the network either pressurized or not. When not, then bring in necessary bulk resources and do major construction.
If closed, then grow crops, and make workshop accomplishments.
But if it is false for safety then don't do it at all.
If it works then plan for a higher technological level on the planet.
I want to study making tar from organic materials such as plankton grown in plastic bags. If the bugs were like those propposed to make bio-fuels, then from that could come Tar, a glue.
Minearal wool does come from rocks.
If the Martians had those two technologies along with the ability to make ice tunnels and pressurize them, then they could make parts from Tar impregnated Minearal wool.
Not a fantastically strong material, but a replacement for Tar Paper. If thick enough walls could be made from it. Not to hold pressure, but to isolate a heated interior from the cold atmosphere of the ice cave. Of course if you have mineral wool, then you can insulate such tar-paper shacks.
Grow plants inside using a artificial light source.
I reason that this level of technology would be less demanding than to construct shelters from stone, plastics, metals and glass.
Having mastered tar paper and mineral wool, they could also have heated workshops where they could begin building the machines and processes for a higher level technology such as glass, plastics, metals and stones.
For instance, instead of landing heavy equipment, perhaps beeds of metal could be hard landed and those turned into machines by such methods available (3D Printer).
But if a metal resource were obtainable locally instead, all the better.
That appears to be true. However this just in:
http://www.space.com/27256-earth-water- … n-sun.html
While it is true water would boil off of lava exposed to the surface for instance, I might suggest that for some planets the accumulation of mass may not be that hot of a process, at least not at first when the cores are small, before you get big collisions.
So to me this means the possiblity of hydrated minerals and carbon materials being burried under layers deep down.
So, then over time emerging in eruptions, from down deep, and in some cases Hydrogen seeping upwards from very deep, and encountering Carbon compounds.
But I am not really all that interested in arguing the point. Either Oil will be found on Mars or not. I think the facts on how planets form and behave over time are too unknown to engage in a further push of the idea on my part.
What I am more interested is generating a biological oil that can be rendered into tar, and to be able also create Mineral Wool.
With those two things, I think structure can be built that will be sufficiently stable to allow buildings to be constructed in ice tunnels.
Ice tunnels may be easy to construct because you would need a laser, and to vent the vapors to atmosphere.
The oil I was talking about for mushrooms would be from organisms grown in a plastic bag at a low pressure. Not harvesting the oil from them, just enhancing an organism that already accumulates hydrocarbons into itself in a significant abundance. Then either that is a fish food, and you grow mushrooms off of the organic waste of that process, or just apply the harvested plankton to the soil, grow mushrooms and so also enhance the soil for vascular photo crops.
I don't have a strong opinion about the sources of oil. It is reasonable that indeed organisms captured hydrocarbons, that accumulated and was cooked into oil, but there is also reason to think that planets forming had carbon and hydrogen incorporated into their deep layers, not all of it would have been expelled during formation. We also thiink that the Earth was hit by a Moon forming object, which would have created a magma ocean over the Earth, but not so much Mars.
If Hydrogen and Carbon bearing compounds were embedded. it can be expected that over time they might in cases be released from those compounds. Hot hydrogen encountering Carbon compounds might generate some Methane. Methane being trapped under a salt dome, might eventually loose some of its hydrogen which might seep out, and so leave behind a residue of oils.
That also leaves out the possibility that there was a mechanism which drew water down into the deeps of Mars. Just like it does now here on Earth. Water encountering Iron for instance would release Hydrogen. and the Hydrogen seeping up might do the same as I described above.
And then what if there was microscopic life on Mars in the past? Perhaps Oil from that.
Mars having a much colder crust would not show as much evidence of oil seeps because it would not flow as well. And then even if there were oil seeps, I am sure they would quickly be masked by air borne dust.
But with all of that I am not looking for oil wells on Mars as a plan.
I leave open the possiblity.
I simply don't have the intellectual resources to do more then display foolishness on this topic.
I agree that it is matter, it is moving at a high speed, and it tends to be plasma which has stored energy, but beyond that I cannot create a method where I would understand that I could create eliments desired. I have at best vague ideas for a partial solution. Not much chances that I can contribute even to speculation.
If you query for salt domes or salt pans on Mars you will find articles about it. Of course the interest would be Potassium Chloride.
Maybe there would be a small local salt deposit that could be mined for it.
One article even indicates that Oil is seeping out of a salt dome on Mars, but that is highly disputed that it is oil.
I will bother you with this one more time.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l05knxG6eT0
If I were to make a suggestion.... At this time the flow of thought seems to favor gardens under diodes, and I am fine with that.
But what if you landed your habitat and wanted to put some shielding on it. Perhaps you could place transparent bags of water over it, perhaps place reflective foil on the ground around it to increase the solar flux. The grow some oil bearing organisms as a plankton. I would suggest that over the bags should be a sheet of plastic with UV protectant on it. Being bags of water they are shielding the habitat to a degree, and moderating it's temperature swings, and even insulating it. The bags then being filled with water would have chances of moderating the thermal stress on the bags, buy being filled with water and by having a layer of plastic with UV protectant over them.
While plastic bags have been characterized in a fairly negative way in this thread, the multiple simple utility of them as radiation protection and source of fish food/soil improver, may justify the cost of importing them from the beginning.
And if somehow oil could be extracted, I would suggest that tar be manufactured with solar concentrators, and that tar could then be used to make mineral wool panels impregnated and glued with tar.
In fact if I were to want to make huts inside of a ice tunnel, I would want structures built of that, and of course insulated with more mineral wool.
I also might say that even after water bags have deteriorated, it should be possible to recycle the material into a 3D printer to make useful parts. This may also help to justify the importation of them. But it would be best to be able to manufacture them on Mars asap, but I think that would be down the road a fair distance.
From that then either feed fish and put their droppings into the soil or simply put the plankton into the soil.
The next step would be to seed the soil with Mushrooms to further improve it.
I hope you don't mind the suggestions.
Thanks for the caution. I have modified my not nice post.
I really am not as riled up as you might suppose. I merely see it as a necessary but frustrating cultural cycle. Has to be.
I think that there are a lot of good developments in the area of space capability. It will just take time, and we have to hope that our "Civilization" has enough time. Our meaning any nation that has the will to dream of it.
My understanding is that most vegans eventually go meat crazy, and have to break down and indulge in it.
I like to think that the proper way to start on Mars is to admit that you have to bring some of the stuff obviously at first.
Then we have the Roman Arch concept, but I actually think that that is too advanced for the early situation. It involves heavy labor, heavy machinery, and would take considerable time. But I am not saying don't do it.
I feel that by working with Ice and as you mentioned artificial bodies of water, a lower technical and less challenging technical achievement would provide gains earlier.
For instance most people don't like the ideas of ice tunnels to farm in, but I think that "Huts" inside made of mineral wool perhaps and a layer of soil would be a better sized task. It is worth mentioning that the Roman arch concept also relies on ice not melting, so it is almost the same thermal challenge.
So I think if lighting a fire. It starts with a spark and goes to a small flame. It takes a skillful sequence to bring it up to the level of a fire.
But I do not reject any on the structure ideas that have been presented here, I just feel that they too will be brought into service as a part of a sequence of expanding capabilities.
I think you should not worry about it.
If you would study the fourth turning, it might make sense.