You are not logged in.
Well, he is still quite the dude.
It is a saying that means that I am dominating, or hogging the show. A good thing if you are making a movie and are a movie star, but not perhaps a good thing here.
That, falling condensate, an at the bottom, steam engines.
And then there are windmills. Just for giggles, I have included a reference to a very unconventional wind generator.
http://www.gizmag.com/ewicon-bladeless- … ine/26907/
It uses an excitation charge and water droplets and wind to generate electrical energy. Don't know if this would make sense on Venus.
Perhaps a method would be to first direct Sulfuric Acid/Water down to a heat where it would decompose into H2O & S2 vapors, and then bring that back up and cool it down to condense the H2O and separate out the S2 for sequestering. Then drop the H20 down the tower, generating electricity.
Then you might do the water droplet thing for generating electricity, but the droplets would vaporize quite fast I suspect, so perhaps it might be possible to;
Heat the water to steam, give the steam a positive electric charge. Vent the steam to atmosphere, at a location where the wind will pull the positively charged steam away, presumably generating additional electrical power.
However, how much electricity is needed? I think more conventional windmills attached to the tower would generate plenty, so drop the water all the way down to the surface of Venus in insulated pipes, and use it for cooling, and to power steam powered robots.
Or as I think you might have been moving, generate electricity with water moving down pipes, and then generate power with hot steam moving up pipes?
Or other schemes.
Err... (I will cool it soon and stop bogarting the web site).
Iron Pyrites. I have been quite confused by this. In one Sci-Fi by a some time ago popular author, it was suggested that Sulfur acted like a metal in a vacuum. I think they might have intended to indicate it's structural strength. Still I don't know.
Here is some more information I have gathered:
How does Iron Pyrite form?
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/inde … 659AAkTsrU
At what temperature does iron pyrite melt?
http://creationwiki.org/Pyrite
https://answers.yahoo.com/question/inde … 938AAtgJwQ
It is a salt.
Contradiction:
http://www.answers.com/Q/Can_pyrite_be_melted
Why is Sulfur a non-metal?
https://sites.google.com/site/elementsu … a-nonmetal
What I get from all of this, in normal air temperatures Iron Pyrite will decay in the presence of Earth Air and Moisture.
So this will help explain why it has not been put to use for much here on Earth.
Possibly the clouds of Venus would also cause it to decay. (Moisture, but not much Oxygen).
It appears that it will survive high temperatures, but not again in the presence of Earth air and Moisture.
Decomposing has been cited as 550 degC in one cases and melting at 1,177-1,188°C DegC? in another case.
Which is rather confusing. I suspect that the 550 degC is in the presence of Air.
Where I am going, is I did not think that Iron Pyrite could survive on the surface of Venus. There are two different surfaces. 1 is supercritical, and might dissolve it, and the other is not. I think altitude is involved.
So I have some hopes after all of sequestering Sulfur in Iron Pyrites on the surface of Venus. If a reaction with the atmosphere will still cause it to decay, then perhaps it can be encapsulated and kept away from the atmospheric gasses which offend.
However, I am hopeful, that this will not be necessary. In fact, I have hope that Iron Pyrites will be less brittle at higher temperatures, and so be useful as parts in high temperature robots.
I wonder if materials could be included into it such as Silica, and Carbon (As Iron becomes Steel).
But maybe something else.
Point is, there was no reason to try to make Iron Pyrites a building material on Earth, because it would just decay, and give off Sulfuric Acid in the presence of Earth atmosphere and water vapor.
But.... (And I certainly do not know), I might hope that in one or both of the two surface environments on Venus (Supercritical (CO2) and not so), it will prove to be a useful machine material.
Otherwise, if encapsulating it will work, then there may be a means to sequester Sulfur from Sulfur Dioxide (Which contributes to Acid Rain), so as to improve the cloud environment of Venus.
Gonna take a rest now, unless someone actually and really wants me to respond to something.
As I see it, the next few generations of humans should be considered ambitious, if they would have towers, floating cities (Oops! hope they don't crash into each other), and as mentioned in another thread floating "Ping-Pong" balls.
I would also presume that they would develop high temperature robots that could work on the surface.
Part of the surface is a Supercritical CO2 oven, which implies that opportunities for material wealth for humans could be associated with it. Humans will just have to figure that out, just like they are presumed to eventually master stone tools.
Energy sources at the surface would presumably be nuclear (Either one), Wind, or Steam.
One item such robots could manufacture might be floating "Ping-Pong" balls. Of whatever materials. Antius made a suggestion on another thread. It would have to be metal and/or silicates. Alternately plastics if manufactured higher up where lower temperatures prevail.
Supposing manufactured on the surface with Metal/Silicates, the mass produced, injected with Nitrogen and released to float up to the clouds, where their surfaces would be moistened. Of course nutrients are also needed, and protection from U.V. may be needed.
The clouds of Venus I believe are more Sulfuric acid at the colder tops, where Verga can form. This rain may fall down far enough in the atmosphere where the Sulfuric Acid vapor resulting will also decompose into SO2 and H2O. The H2O rises to the lower clouds, and eventually is recombined with SO2 to form Acid Rain again.
If the towers could suck in the upper cloud layer Sulfuric Acid and push it down the tower, then the elevated temperatures encountered would decompose the Sulfuric Acid to SO2, and H2O. The SO2 could be sequestered into holding tanks far below, where the air pressure is very high. The H2O might be conducted upwards and condensed to water, and that water might be allowed to fall all the way down to the bottom of the towers, generating electricity. Of course thermal insulation on the pipes needed.
Once the water was at the bottom of the tower in an insulated tank on the surface of Venus, can I presume it can be used to power steam engines? Superhot steam engines to power robots?
As I have indicated on another thread, I see the potential that the Ping-Pong balls with Algae growing on their surfaces could be harvested, the organic matter extracted and the Ping-Pong balls reused.
The hardest part of this is to deal with the U.V. I think. But then unlike Mars, there will be a significant atmosphere above them. Perhaps some algae could adapt to high U.V.?
Anyway, I don't intend a full terraform.
If you got a bunch of extra water at massive expense and had also waited hundreds/thousands of years for Venus to cool off on the surface, dumping large quantities of water on its surface would in my opinion result in massive super volcanos, of such a magnitude that they would be a danger to human survival on the planet.
I glad to get the eggs, I don't need to kill and eat the goose.
I like your direction.
You do indicate that after Jupiter, without solar concentrators, sunlight will not be sufficient to drive biological activity.
I suggest making a shell world, but not around a planet or moon.
Your choice of materials, presumably using what is locally available.
For worlds like Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune.
Example, for Jupiter-Callisto.
Make a shell world. It can likely be made using metals and silicates. Make it thick enough to block radiation. Paraffin wax and water are possible radiation blocking materials.
Inflate an interior atmosphere with water vapor and Air. The component of water vapor will be dependent on the interior temperatures. (Presuming water ice or water are present in the interior of the shell).
If you don't want to use tanks and conduits, then you can have water sticking to, condensing on the shells inner surface. An extractor would return liquid water to your hot process, and evaporative cooling could be utilized, venting the vapors to the interior of the shell.
Or at higher pressures, you could have a completely liquid cooling process.
However, I think low pressures, and evaporative cooling.
Spinning habitats inside of this structure.
For electrical power, even at Pluto, you have the solar wind.
However, I mentioned an outer planet. Inside it's magnetic field, the shell having embedded conductors to cut magnetic lines of force. Of course this being a source of energy.
The shell/habitat assembly being locked by gravitation to Callisto, in one of it's "L" locations. Eventually dragging Callisto deeper, so that it gets into resonance with Ganymede.
Io, Europa, Ganymede, and eventually Callisto (Maybe).
The energizing forced would at first be Callisto's own orbital energy, and later on if locked in resonance, then the spin of Jupiter itself which pushes Io>Europa>Ganymede> and maybe Callisto.
If there were an large undiscovered planet in our outer outer solar system, and it had moon(s), then this might be a good way to "Inhabit" it's location.
All good thoughts.
Just now I am working in a particular direction, perhaps you can help.
I do accept that a constructed building could substitute for a cave. Particularly if the inflatable habitat is capable of holding its own air pressure with or with out the rock/masonary overcoat.
Sandstone caves most likely restricts you to certain locations on the equator, such as Mt. Sharp.
So, in the case of sandstone, I am thinking of a cave carved into the mountain (Many of them in time).
Before the inflatable insert is deployed to fill the cave, of course there would be an open portal, that the excavation was started from and that the removed material exited through. In addition, at the back of the cave would be a narrow tunnel, that could connect many of these constructions with each other (The tunnels, not having portals to the outside).
The inflatable insert would be deployed. It would have two paths for humans to enter and exit. Perhaps an air lock on each one, or perhaps just a door for the interior connection to the tunnels.
While each insert is intended to be highly safe from depressurization, the tunnels will be less safe. Perhaps even just sealed with a sealant, and perhaps web material.
So after each of these was created, then attach an inflatable greenhouse to the outside airlock.
You said:
Maybe some sort of polytunnel would be the best choice for agriculture. Polypropylene is easy to manufacture in sheets, is transluscent and resistant to creep and fatigue. If pressure within the tunnel is kept to 150mb, then gardeners could be provided with compressed O2 cylinders for breathing. UV protection could be provided by a sacrificial outer layer which can be doped to absorb UV at the neccesary wavelengths.
The greenhouse will only be partially pressurized. Both the inflated hab and the greenhouse will be filled with a N2 & O2 mix.
The greenhouse itself will need an airlock exit to the outside.
It should be possible to pump "Air" from the Greenhouse into the inflatable hab. Of course this would allow the movement of Oxygen from greenhouse plants to the humans who need it. CO2 from the hab could be vented to the greenhouse or outside, and also excess "Air" could be vented to the greenhouse. During times of plant growth, outside air could be injected into the greenhouse at slow rates, and this could help in the collection of Nitrogen, if in fact scrubbed CO2 concentrate could be vented from the inflatable hab to the outside.
It is my intention that both the inflatable hab and greenhouse will operate at variable air pressures.
So, if humans were planning to do an EVA outside on the surface of Mars, first, the greenhouse would be pumped down to a minimum value that the plants could be tolerated. The "Air" would be pumped from the greenhouse into the hab (slowly).
This would allow a minimum differential pressure between the greenhouse and the outside, making the use of that airlock less resource consuming. After the work outside was done, tools and machinery could be deposited in an appropriate area of the greenhouse, and the suited persons would be in the greenhouse also, and then air would be vented carefully from the inflatable hab into the greenhouse. Enough to allow for liquid wash water. So wet washing of toxins off from suits an equipment would be possible. The persons would return into the inflatable hab, and the greenhouse would be pressurized slowly to the optimal pressure for plant growth.
I do understand that their are good plans to reduce contamination of toxins in the human habitat, but I think this goes steps further.
Your variation is a completely valid solution to your view of what is desired.
My view of what is desired is different, so of course my variation will differ.
I am the guest on this thread, and I request that you do what you can to discuss this in both directions, yours and mine.
My view of Venus is that what is wanted is to find a chink in it's armor sufficient to allow settlements there, but not requiring a large population, at least not at first.
Major terraforming would be a decision that the "Inhabitants" would make later. Perhaps they will instead want to keep their supercritical CO2 oven down below.
So, my emphasis would be on getting the most useful results to make Venus realistically habitible with the least effort.
I am just pulling a number out of the air, but I feel that if 50,000 people lived at each pole (100,000) total, that would still be useful to the human race, in terms of cultural diversity, and also an insurance policy for the greater chances of the continuation of the human race.
So, I look at the things which will be annoying in the zone of Venus which is most habitable.
1) Lack of a surface to walk on. 2) Acid rain which will damage equipment, and burn exposed skin. 3) U.V. light.
Floating cities and towers can help with #1, Towers can maybe help with #2, Ping pong ball slime agriculture can help with #3, and might also provide an important source of feedstock for organic chemistry, and might even provide food.
For instance your habitat might suck in these ping pong balls, and somehow place them in and enclosure where an animal may feed on the algae on their surfaces, and then eject them again.
Of course such animals (Fish?) will need some tolerance of toxins from the outside (CO2), and a method would need to be devised to deliver the ping pong balls to the feeding area with a minimum of intake of such toxins.
I do have an idea for sequestering Sulfur other than SO2. Iron Pyrites. At lower temperatures than the surface it might remain stable. It is not a champion building material, but I am thinking of some process where it would be woven into another material, maybe 3D printed. Perhaps your floating cities could be in part made of Iron Pyrites. (Fools Gold).
Dealing with U.V. will be an issue. To get free oxygen, you have to sequester something. You would need free Oxygen in a significant layer, in order to hope to develop an Ozone layer.
However here, I may have an idea, which is not too far removed from Carl Sagans original idea for terraforming, but it would only be used to a small degree.
If fish eat algae from floating ping pong balls, then the fish waste/Human waste (Humans presumed to eat fish), could be subjected to a hot oven (Not hard on Venus), gassing off the volatiles, and leaving a Carbon rich residue.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_fibers
So Carbon fibers as a building material, sequestered to remain un-oxidized for a prolonged period.
Making parts of the cities, and maybe towers as well.
So I want a Venus with water clouds that are not too acid. They don't have to be neutral P.H.
I also want to hope that there is a chance to produce a enhanced volume of free Oxygen, and that that Oxygen will tend to form enriched layer in the upper atmosphere. However wishing might not do the trick. The Oxygen might mix very well, and also with more O2, you might just get interaction between CO2, Oxygen, and U.V. light to produce CO.
But that would not be a total loss, because then your atmospheric engine would then work on Venus, since there would be quantities of CO and O2 mixed into the atmosphere.
In that case, you might need some type of transparent beads, with flotation gasses in them that would float higher than your clouds, and would filter U.V. light out.
Having achieved this then the inhabitants could lay their plans for the next phase of terraforming if any, like a caterpillar preparing to become a butterfly.
If much photo agriculture could occur in low pressure greenhouses on Mars, then perhaps more effort could be devoted to habitat for humans. Such habitat might include some windows, and perhaps artificial lighting for special plants.
I am wondering about these familiar items:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BA_330![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevlar
Where I am going with this, is can you make habitat walls such as for the expandable modules, but not bother with the expansion thing?
Could the materials such as Kevlar be largely manufactured on Mars largely from atmospheric gasses and water, and perhaps printed into sheets with the evil 3D printer tech?
Also it seems like if you were to carve sandstone caves, this tech could make a very good airtight lining for such caves. Wouldn't have to be 18 inches thick in that case either. However on second thought, perhaps expansion would be a good option, where you would carve a cave, and then insert the unexpanded section, and then expand it to fill the whole cave. Again 18 inches not needed for such a method, I would think.
Well, I think I will mess with this.
I like the towers notion at the poles, where I have wanted to suppose S02 could be sequestered, to reduce acid rain. This has been mentioned in other threads in recent time of this post.
But now contrary to other notions, I suggest putting super greenhouse gasses into the upper atmosphere of Venus to make it's atmosphere swell up. In addition I would like to not reflect light but absorb it. Perhaps floating Ping-Pong balls filled with N2. Wetted by the H20 clouds (After the acid rain is cured). Fertilized by dust as you suggested, either from space or the surface of Venus.
Turning the surface temperatures to thousands of degrees. Swelling the atmosphere.
Major problem: How to make towers that will stand such temperatures.
Anyway, since the solar wind sweeps atmosphere from Venus, if you swell it up further in the gravity well of Venus, it will sweep even more atmosphere away. To protect H20, perhaps O2 generated on the Ping-Pong balls by algae/cyanobacteria, would allow for an Ozone layer above the water layer.
The real objective would not be so much to deplete the atmosphere of Venus, but to harvest it.
Upper atmosphere manipulated into plasma, might be collected into plasma bubbles and directed to a Mars impact. Ideally Mars with a 2 bar atmosphere would be nice.
Venus itself would still support floating colonies. (The Ping-Pong balls would be too small to cause major damage if they impacted such colonies. Towers at the poles might still be possible.
And a major supercritical CO2 oven at the surface, perhaps refining substances desired.
900 degrees would kill you as much as thousands of degrees anyway.
Far fetched? You bet. Not the greenhouse gasses though, and the swelling atmosphere.
I guess there is a difference in our visions. You seem to lock onto a certain end situation for Venus, I am much more interested in the first "Buy In". That is, I would be most interested in two polar communities, sequestering SO2, so as to deactivate the acid rain.
Also about the towers, I am not sure that pressurization has to be the end game on Venus. I suspect that it has already been mentioned, but the best places to store unwanted substances would be lower down where the atmosphere is quite dense. However to keep the towers erect, I see no problem with involving lighter than air sections. N2 & O2 where temps are low. N2 where temperatures are high. Helium and/or Hydrogen where it was suitable. In other words make each section neutral buoyancy (Approximately) by different gas mixes used to lift the solid materials of the apparatus itself.
As for lighting, yes your scheme could be valid, it by no means excludes other options as potentially valid as well.
I am quite excited by the notion that such methods might yield a place in space/time where an offshoot of humanity might escape molestation by cultural vampires bent on extracting life forces from a presumed inventive sub population. Not putting all the eggs in one basket so to speak, and fighting against devolution of the human mind.
I rather agree. However, I would not rule out industrial type bulk agriculture.
If you could grow some type of weed in a harsh environment, not out on the unmodified surface, but a low pressure greenhouse, then you would have hopes of edible and other useful organics.
I think as food becomes scarce on Earth, (Overfished Oceans, degraded farm lands, degraded water supplies, and swelling population), it will be natural for research in this area to be preformed on Earth for Earth populations, and so a Martian colony will get free research on how to transform a weed into food and fuel.
I say weed, because most extreme organisms are likely to be inedible in their natural form, but they may survive harsh conditions, requiring less effort to grow them.
With or without the possibility of ice reservoirs near the surface. (But I read that the Mariner Rift Valley floor may cover vast fields of ancient ice).
In spite of such a hope, I suggest "Dry Wells".
The idea being that since the typical Martian equatorial day is bone dry, but often the nighttime air reaches saturation or close to it, I would expect that the soil a few feet down may hold a humidity which is about 50% Rh.
Hoping to drill wells and pull up liquid water is not likely to be feasible in the first years of a settlement, it would require too much effort. Plus it might not work, and it might just pull up brine.
Mining water ice requires you to be at high latitude, and therefor impose a penalty of a harsher climate. Also mining ice will be labor intensive, and also require heavy machinery.
I would like to find a location of regolith where coarser crushed rock is covered by a top layer of fines plugging to some extent the communion of air above the surface with air in the Regolith. Or a crack which extends downward between two enormous slabs of bedrock. Here, again I would hope and expect that the top of the crack would be plugged by small stone, and fines (Martian dust).
Digging a "Well" into that might allow the extraction of sub-surface air, and air which I presume is enriched with water vapor relative to the daytime.
While the nighttime may have greater than 50% RH at the coldest period of the night, the air will be quite cold, and so in reality perhaps hold less actual water than subsurface air at a cold temperature? and ~50% RH.
Further, during the night, it is hard to obtain energy to pull a vacuum on a "Dry Well". During the day, you may have solar energy, and so could pull air out of a "Dry Well" and compress it to obtain water. However, why not make a "Shed" out of thermally conductive materials, and have it filled with cold rocks. This could likely be accomplished by simply piling up some rocks, and putting a vapor blocking film over them as a roof, and bonding the edges of the film with the Martian surface by piling soil on those edges. I would think the film should be reflective to sunlight.
In the nighttime, the pile of rocks will transfer heat by natural convection of air internal to the device to the film. The film will radiate heat to the night sky. During the day, the solar energy collected could serve to pull a vacuum on the dry well, the air pulled out being dumped into the covered pile of cold rocks. Ideally the rock pile device will not require pressurization, but it is not ruled out, if needed.
Obviously I hope to see rocks cooled substantially below the temperature of the Regolith. Of course the intention is to condense a frost of water on those rocks. Porous rocks might be best, but not necessary.
Periodically during certain days, hot air from solar heating could be circulated through the rock pile to extract frost as water vapor, and then at that point, likely a forced condensation provided, most likely dominated by pressurization.
As for the Vacuum, I think it would be best to have a vacuum tank where a vacuum pump would keep it pulled down to roughing pump capabilities, >1 mb, and that a cycled valve would open and close, causing a pulsed vacuum to be experienced in the "Dry Well". This is in the hope that pulses will reach deeper, and will actually transmit energy, warming up the Regolith, perhaps liberating more water molecules bound to rocks and soil.
Of course such a reservoir might be depleted after a while, but so are oil wells. If it lasts a number of years, to support an equatorial starter colony, then it might be worth it. Further, I expect that to some extent the regolith extracted from will be recharged also. This might come from the night atmosphere, or who knows maybe a buried ice layer below, or maybe even a salty aquifer far below, and the moisture which is bound to exist above it.
Moisture flows from wet to dry, and from hot to cold.
And then again there is the electron notion strip electrons from the atmosphere of Mars, and inject them into the dry well. This may induce positive charged ions (Some of them water vapor to flow towards the extraction point of the dry well.
![]()
There is a try Yoda, it just might not matter.
If there is indeed an ice layer too deep to mine, perhaps this can get some of it up to human use.
I don't think it is yet understood which planet or moon might be the best fulcrum & lever for the intentions hoped intentions of the future human race.
The hope is that they will even seek. There is still hope.
Some recent advancements in material procurements by some societies on Earth offer hope that the human race will not choose to abort it's brains and minds and choose to live in squalor.
Recent meaning 200 to 500 years.
Mars still is the front contender as far as I am concerned, but the Moon, Venus, and Ceres suggest alternatives.
200-500 years is a long time, if you are not falling into dark ages, but progressing.
Mars does not have to be perfect. It can last for some time as mercy from the harshest plays of the universe. So, I would not worry so much about atmospheric loss, or Nitrogen.
The planet comes rather close to being able to support life, and I suggest that technology and adaptation, will ultimately suffice to provide shelter for an important branch of the human race, one that invents it's future, and does not let book bangers practice a universal cultural lobotomy on the whole human race.
Clearly domes and ice covered reservoirs can have elevated nitrogen levels. With the coming robotics, either humans will have great material wealth, even on Mars, or will go extinct, or will become cyborgs.
So, atmospheric loss and Nitrogen levels are of less interest.
As far as I am concerned this could start humble. I am building in part on what others provided.
As I see it, yes towers/containers in the polar areas. Store Sulfur Dioxide if possible, reduce the "Acid Rain" potential of the planet.
As for the tops, they could be constructed to slowly spin on a 24 hour rotation, perhaps making the environment more compatible with the plants we have that evolved on Earth.f
How far to expand this an in what manner? Plenty of time to figure that out.
Point is, I think this is a scheme competitive with the notion of inhabiting Mars. Reduce the Acid, and at that point Venus may have much more to offer than Mars.
It's worth a continued think anyway.
I suppose I should know better, but.....
Actually, I can see opportunity to store SO2 in certain parts of such towers. Having done that, you interrupt the process where SO2 and H2O are combined with UV to produce Sulfuric Acid.
As for visible light, if you continue the towers high enough, yes, at the start to cool the situation, reflection, but if a planet wide process, then later, inclined tops of such towers with terracing either convex, or concave (Preferred in my opinion). Since Venus has 2X light, and plants only need 1/10th light, optimally 20 times the amount of vegetation, and a greater surface area.
_ _
|_ _|
|_|
A reminder, Sulfuric acid decomposes to H2O and SO2 if you heat it up, as in lower down in the atmosphere of Venus.
So Hurray! I think you've got it!
As for water, I think their is enough to dampen all surfaces, no need for reservoirs, so maybe no need to import water, or anything. ![]()
Don't waste time wondering what I think you think of me, don't care.
Karov,
This opinion is worth what you paid for it 0$ ![]()
You made me think about stuff, and now I have to vent it would seem.
A question is, is the Earth better in an ice age or as now? (For supporting life).
In an ice age, the ocean levels are lower, and so the atmospheric column over them is deeper. This fact seems to be lost on the "Snowball Earth" theory people. Perhaps there are less deserts. Granted ice caps themselves are not that biological.
But you suggested tinkering with the Earth. Well, if you could reduce the amount of water on the planet, and increase the amount of N2 and O2, I think you might have more land, and less desert land, and potentially little ice cap land.
With a thicker atmosphere, then water vapor should be able to rise higher (A deeper troposphere), crossing over mountains, to water some of the deserts. Less water would lead to shallower oceans, which the article you cited seemed to like. Ocean water with say 5000 feet shaved off, and therefore 5000 more feet of atmosphere (With or without adding more atmosphere), would be warmer, since a greater greenhouse effect would be over the ocean surfaces, but not so much over the continents.
More evaporation from the Oceans, but not as much evaporation from the tops of the continents. The continents being more colder than now as relative to the oceans, then more precipitation.
Of course a greater greenhouse effect might be unwelcome.
The Earths moon then might be a tow mechanism to pull the Earth to orbits further from the sun if you like.
http://phys.org/news/2010-10-solar-power-earth.html
http://www.alternative-energy-news.info … ind-power/
Thing is if you could make the Moon a solar wind sail, then you could turn the electrical load on and off as you wished, the so when harvesting electrical energy, also produce a thrust. However you would only want to do that as it suited your master plan to move the Earth away from the sun.
Water taken from the Earth might be put into containers on the Moon. Perhaps underground seas.
Variations on this theme might allow the moving of all terrestrial planets outward as the sun heats up.
For the planet Mars, perhaps moving it some enormous time from now into the orbit of some outer planet. (Pick up Ceres as a moon on the way). Mars could be put into a resonance with another object that orbits an outer planet, and so be awakened geologically by tidal heating. Further if it were slightly embedded in another planets magnetic field it might not need one itself.
This set of (Very important!!!) notions has actually perhaps two values.
1) Young children who might fixate on the mortality of our world in 1/2 billion years, could be assured that they are perfectly safe ![]()
2) If their were alien civilizations to search for around white dwarf stars, then we might speculate that they might have to cared to do the above process to save and keep using their terrestrial planets, and so this might be and understanding that might help to reveal their existence some day.
Oh well, for what it's worth anyway. Some further imagination. Make a Sci-Fi. Make people happy ![]()
Yes, it is the capitol of our galactic empire isn't it?
I am very ashamed because I apparently insulted you. It seems to be a "Lost in translation" issue. I have a very deep respect for what you offer for thinking.
When I think in such matters, I think in something other than verbal language. The translations do not always work.
But a body has bones which are rigid, but still have joints. It also has muscles. A body without muscles (Rigidity) would be a quivering mass on the floor. I seek a balance. I understand that rocketry, which I understandably should be humble before, requires the best thinking. It is risky when I venture into such areas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daphnia
http://www.fishchannel.com/freshwater-a … phnia.aspx
http://www.discushatchery.com/raisingdaphnia.html
http://www.discushatchery.com/raisingdaphnia.html
http://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2012/03/13237.htm
The creatures appear to be flexible and reasonably durable. It looks like the water has to be partially changed out periodically. They don't need a lot of Oxygen?
http://www.discushatchery.com/daphnia.jpg
Could we add mushrooms to our soup?
The point being that you might bypass some of the phobia's and bad press which might involve insects. Of course this is a wet process. I wonder how fine you would have to grind your insects to not plug up your 3D printer? All that bug juice too.
I might note that the detritus, might be recycled to grow mushrooms.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Detritus
Or your choice ![]()
I like your posted articles though. If people go to Mars, they can eat what they want, if they have it.
Then again brine shrimp:
http://wildlife.utah.gov/gsl/brineshrimp/life_cycle.php
Brine shrimp
The life cycleCourtesy of the U.S. Geological Survey.
Whether baby brine shrimp hatch from a cyst or are born live, in its first free- swimming period it is called a nauplius (plural: nauplii). The rate at which it develops through the rest of the stages in its life cycle is affected by salinity, water temperature, and food availability. The algae on which brine shrimp feed is most abundant at the end of winter, and Artemia attempt to time cyst hatching with the highest food availability. This occurs when water temperatures reach 4 °C (48 °F), typically by February or March. The emerging nauplii feed on the abundant algae, providing energy for the 12-24 molting stages a brine shrimp goes through to reach maturity, a process that takes 2-3 weeks depending on food availability and temperature. The average adult will produce around 8 broods, generally a combination of both egg and cysts, and since 1995 the GSL population has produced around 2-4 generations per year.
The Utah Division of Wildlife Resources monitors the various age classes and finds that peak numbers of nauplii occur in mid-April to mid-May. Peak numbers of adults occur in late May, depleting the phytoplankton food source. The stress of a lack of food triggers cysts production in females, and as adults die off, there are fewer live young to replace them on the lake. Generally, December brings cold enough weather to decrease water temperatures to around 6 °C (42 °F) (UGS), and the last free-swimming shrimp are killed by the cold. Cyst densities increase throughout the fall, until thick mats of cysts occur on some portions of the lake, known as "streaks". Cysts also wash up on the shore.
I mention the brine shrimp, because humans in my culture do eat shrimp, so it might not be as big a stretch as eating bugs. And their best growth rates seem to be compatible with lower temperatures. This could suggest enclosures with lower air pressure, and greater content of Oxygen to compensate. They eat algae of course.
But on to your 3D printer sub topic, many of these creatures might be terminated by methods not as cruel, perhaps freezing temperatures, or degassing the enclosure. But similar can be said of insects as well.
I would think that a mixture of algae could be added if you are going to 3D print, for a more balanced food. But I bet if you are not careful intestinal upsets could also be produced. You would have to be selective about your selection of materials.
These sources might be less labor intensive.
I have a vague notion of what the "Electric Universe" people propose. I am not a champion of it, they can do that.
I appreciate your rigid attitude, with just a bit of open mindedness stirred in.
You are a rocket guy, and if you don't get the formulation right, they easily do not do what you want, and most often do what you don't want, in an extreme way.
Without the open mindedness, however (In small measures) you would be doomed to go in circles forever and never be able to incorporate a new method.
Electric exists as you say, but caution is appropriate in attributing more to it than is demonstrated. But eyes and other senses open when you have the time usually costs little.
GW, I made a reference to one of your posts here. (#83)
Index
» Life support systems
» Emulation of Earth life form methods to achieve value added purposes.
Suit yourself.
What GW offers makes sense, as long as you have a significant wealth generating method associated with it.
Shells methods. GW mentions a microgravity garage.
Typically most people think of making one single shell, or shells bonded to each other in close proximity, to define the difference between the hostile environments of space and the places where you will shelter humans and sensitive machines. I think different that that as well.
For a small world I am thinking of a metal shell. It is humorous. Old time space art as a joke might have suggested an umbrella to protect people in spacesuits on the Moon. They were not that far off. Think horseshoe crab. It climbs out of the ocean onto the shore at times.
On the Moon or a smaller world, such a shell with mobility legs below it offer some chances at achieving protection of humans, mobility, and achieving a purpose.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka_doll
Layers.
Don't not use layers, and different sized volumes.
Quoted from "
Index
» Human missions
» SLS Rocket + Orion + Apollo LEM
".
#83 Today 17:39:17
GW Johnson
Member
From: McGregor, Texas USA
Registered: 2011-12-04
Posts: 1,283
WebsiteRe: SLS Rocket + Orion + Apollo LEM
Responding to Spacenut in #82:
Want a small "shipyard" we could build almost right now? Take a look at what I posted in the article "On-Orbit Repair and Assembly Facility" dated 2-11-14, located at my blog http://exrocketman.blogspot.com. This includes an unpressurized but thermally-stabilized and well-lit work bay, and very supple MCP suits to eable the necessary dexterity. I intended it for LEO, but it would work for this L1 refurbishment application. You only man it and use it when you need it. In point of fact, I would now put one on any Mars mission orbit-to-orbit transport design, as a part of avoiding the costs of a dead crew.
GW
Last edited by GW Johnson (Today 17:40:07)
Yes, GW.
I don't dispute that the effects from the sun other than visible light may not add up to a significant effect on many worlds. But there must be an effect. They should not dispute that.
I fully state that if you create a differential voltage, and have a conductor, current will flow. If current flows though the materials of an object it will heat it. While that might be dismissed as a small effect, so also small are the effects of radioactive decay. It is just that a planet has a lot of thermal insulation to prevent the heat getting out so rock is melted, and volcanism occurs.
Putting myself in the firing line, for Ceres, if it has any kind of a conductive layer, a fluctuating plasma field must generate a counter EMF, and so an opposing magnetic field. The fluctuation in itself will excite molecules attracted by it. Further, if somehow a magnetic reconnection of a plasma loop were to occur with the induced field of Ceres, I think it might discharge a lot of energy into Ceres.
As for UV, if one half of a object is lit up, and the other dark, I anticipate a differential voltage and so a current, since the object is not a perfect resistor.
But the effects may or may not be of significance to the issue of liquid fluids or life.