You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

#8451 Re: Terraformation » The end of the line for Mars Terraforming? » 2015-11-08 17:50:57

I prefer that someone else will do the last post on this thread, but I feel like adding further encouragement.

In my view, Mavin by itself is fairly scary.  However for my mind, evidences from articles, and calculations from Antius paint a picture of Mars that may be better than what was supposed.

A good reason to set some people up on Mars, is so that they can be in a place which is not a strong analog of Earth.  It must however provide the real potential for substantial rewards for those willing to struggle.  I believe that the Mars I think I am seeing is better for that than the one which was previously supposed.

I have always been a slow and incomplete learner, so I will review this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_(narrative)
2.1 Man against man 2.2 Man against society 2.3 Man against nature 2.4 Man against self

Man against nature is the one where technologies are developed which can truly benefit humans.

I am afraid that on Earth we have too much of the other ones, particularly Man against man.

They will all follow humans to Mars, but Mars will give rewards to people of tools more then might otherwise be.  Earth currently gives more and more rewards to people of words and weapons.  This is the pathway to the death of consciousness.

The people who rule with books can both be demons or angels perhaps.

So, the typical pattern is for well damaged societies to obtain technology from tool inventing cultures, and use excessive language and communication skills to invent a story of how "Those other people" are bad for some reason.  In it's worst form you will see them using advanced weapons, skills invented by others, violence, and a actual lack of true intelligence to conquest neighbors.  Yes every nation does a bit of that, but some can only do that.  And we have one that emerged that thinks it has a right to take other people as slaves, or to kill them for not submitting.  Completely depriving them of free will.

This unfortunately is what happens when people stumble on to a vast bucket of wealth, without having to struggle technologically.   They are idiot savants at cruelty, violence, and domination.

A good way to turn the human race at least partially away from this degeneracy, is a new frontier, and if it has rewards and requires technological struggle for reward, then it is good for the quality of future humans.

The Mars I am seeing now may very well have very large pockets of water ice at the equator, which in my mind makes the level of struggle needed to inhabit Mars proportioned appropriately.  Social orders there will just not have that much room for slave masters.  Sure they can go there and try to set up their Man over Man feeding frenzy, but as their slave, I might just forget how to maintain their life support.  Oops!

#8452 Re: Terraformation » The end of the line for Mars Terraforming? » 2015-11-07 09:02:48

Very good stuff.  Much of it I had not thought about.

I think in many ways our ways are not parallel exactly but they converge very closely where it matters.

I would think that if the intention was to put humans on Mars, then:

1) Backpacker visits, outposts.
2) Establish a full habitation at most favored locations. 
*In my ideal, this would be small "Towns" near the equator, and the beginnings of Megga-Cities at locations of deep ice laden sediments.
-If the Northern Hemisphere is a deep basin partially filled with ice and other sediments from a collapsed Hydrosphere/Atmosphere, then a partially underground city started at a favorable location there.  It is even possible that the start would be within the;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valles_Marineris
400px-Valles_Marineris_%26_outflow_channels_MOLA_zoom_64.jpg

Fossil Ice in Valles Marineris:
http://www.sciences.univ-nantes.fr/lpgn … 85&lang=en
http://www.dmzone.org/papers/Gourroncetal2014_VM.pdf
Interestingly this one had the NASA emblem on the page, but not when I paste it here:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014Geomo.204..235G
I really like this one:
https://planetarygeomorphology.wordpres … eris-mars/
And just observe the brilliance of this guy!
http://www.newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php?id=7291

To me the rift valley information suggests that during the final phases of the transition, a troposphere still existed in the low basins, which would include the Northern Hemisphere, and the Valles Marineris, and that the areas above that were already approaching conditions similar to those on Mars today.

So, returning to habitation and terraformation, as I see it:
Once you start your mega-city in the fossil ice deposits somewhere, the atmosphere is primarily a raw materials resource.  Carbon and Oxygen, primarily Carbon. 

Of course as you have indicated it is also to a degree a radiation shield.

So, in order to make your underground mega-city with solar towers with heliostats, you will use a fair amount of materials incorporating Carbon and Hydrogen in their structures.  You will generate hydrocarbon pollution to the atmosphere naturally.  (Or unnaturally if you prefer to say it).

So, you will have a bias to begin ridding Mars of CO2 condensation, by warming, to bring the atmospheric pressure up to 11 mb CO2.

If desired, at first and if affordable they may also manufacture and release a small amount of super greenhouse gasses to start the process up sooner.

At that point I have read that in addition to not having your seasonal CO2 caps anymore, you would have real snowfalls, and snowmelts and temporary streams.  For the southern hemisphere low latitudes this will be valuable as you could create a method to capture those snow melts and use the water locally perhaps in a mining operation for instance.  Your minerals will be where they are, and if the Northern Hemisphere is covered with sediments, it means that many minerals will not be accessible there.

Back to the Mega-city:
Although other solar methods are not against the law smile, I focus on bio-solar towers with heliostats.  Among the things to grow being spirulina, which is eatable, and will generate oodles of Oxygen, and will capture Carbon from compressed atmosphere, and Hydrogen from water to produce hydrocarbons which may be used to create city structure under the ice and in sandstone under the ice.

So, you harvest Carbon from the atmosphere, Hydrogen from water ice, release O2 to the atmosphere, build a very massive underground mega-city which might cover 1/2 of the planet.  You import massive amounts of people from Earth (If you have massive advances in technology).

You end up with a 11 mb atmosphere of O2 with a pinch of Nitrogen, Argon, and Carbon Dioxide, and;

You get an Ozone layer (I hope) and;

You may grow Lichens, Cyanobacteria, Algae on the open surface.

Should the inhabitants elect to up the greenhouse effect and release more CO2 from the ground (Presumably available), or get it from asteroids, then the atmosphere could be brought up to higher levels of pressure.  But that would be up to the inhabitants.

I will point out to others that 11 mb of O2 should leave Mars approximately as cold as 7 mb CO2, so if going to a O2 atmosphere, I think you would want to bring it up to 22 mb O2 minimum in order to sustain snowfalls, snow melts, and temporary streams.

22 mb O2 would do a little more perhaps to reduce the temperature swings day and night, and would also circulate heat from equator to poles a little more, but not that much.

#8453 Re: Terraformation » The end of the line for Mars Terraforming? » 2015-11-06 20:21:18

Pumping out gas requires an economically super life support system.  Advanced from what we have on Earth.  Understanding what the nature of Mars is will allow us to understand what it wants to provide us, and what will make it angry. sad

I know that sounds silly, but in my opinion, a standard terraform plan (Expand CO2 volume) will endanger the usefulness of vast portions of the planet for use, for a very long time, if indeed a portion of a collapsed atmosphere is contained in basins such as the Northern Hemisphere.

Melting a thick layer of ice will be very unstable, particularly if there are dust sediments layered in it.

For instance you might have a lake develop on the surface, and yet one day a quake opens a crack, and the water gushes down and ice heaves up.

I also question the relative value of a cool Mars with an expanded 6-(300-1000) mb atmosphere of CO2, to an alternative which would be a cold Mars with an expanded atmosphere of ~11 mb converted to O2 with room to gradually bring that up to a hoped minimum 250 mb 02.

My opinion at this time is to primarily make solar thermal towers with heliostats.  Those towers, not directly boiling water, but rather holding a micro-organism such as spirulina, and generating O2 both from CO2 and H20.  And creating biomass.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spirulina … upplement)

But this is my view.

I think that having a atmosphere of lets say 250 mb O2 with an Ozone layer will be more valuable than having one of 250 mb of CO2 without an Ozone layer.  (Keep in mind that ~125 mb of that O2 might come from H2O).

I think that having a atmosphere of lets say 50 mb O2 with an Ozone layer may be more valuable than having one of 250 mb of CO2 without an Ozone layer.  (Keep in mind that ~25 mb of that O2 might come from H2O).


If it is true that the Northern Hemisphere is largely filled with very deep sediments of Water Ice, Volcanic ash, wind blown dust/sand, CO2 layers buried, and perhaps Nitrous Oxide Clithrates, then a world within a world can be created.

A "Downstairs" world which would consist of partially buried cities with solar towers where Spirulina (Or other things) could be grown in concentrated light.  The solar towers can also be a source of electrical power without damaging the biological function.

These partially buried cities, towns and houses can be connected by tunnels, some of which would be hyperloops.

Although people might venture on the surface in spacesuits, I anticipate that they will be able to do most surface work with virtual reality/telepresence methods.

When they go to the surface in a suit or a car, they might be much more benefited by having a 250 mb of O2 than with 250 mb of CO2.

When they got on the surface, many places might usually be too cold for active life on the surface, but Lichens, and Cyanobacteria and Algae would be possible most places, and in many places there would be times daily or seasonally where temperatures could approach or exceed the freezing point of water.  Keep in mind that Lichen can grow even if it gets watered by snow, it does not even have to go above freezing temperatures to grow.

For the Northern Hemisphere, it would be very important to make sure that the permafrost was not disrupted by excessive high temperatures.  In building up an O2 dominated atmosphere, you would want to just leak a trickle of additional CO2 to the initial starting value of about 11 mb.  (~11 mb if you vaporize what is know to exist in the south ice cap).

What about the Southern Hemisphere?  Well it has ice layers as well towards the poles, so the plan sort of applies.

As for the deep basins, how about orbital mirrors to warm them up?  Then you could have as warm a climate in those southern basins as you might want.  The Sahara, if you want.  But the Southern Ice Cap being at elevation you should also be able to melt it with mirrors and get rivers to run into those basins, such as Hellas, and with the additional drop in altitude, should have a higher air pressure in those basins.
Hopefully not too much a partial pressure of O2.

So far I am the only one who recommends this plan.  But obviously if the nature of Mars is that it has a part of a collapsed atmosphere in it's Northern Hemisphere, we want to know.

That's how I think.  That's how I do my process.  I would not choose to do it any other way.

However, remember that I will be dead and gone, so don't get wild on me about it.

#8454 Re: Terraformation » The end of the line for Mars Terraforming? » 2015-11-06 14:20:54

I like that information.

I would like to try to support it from another direction.

It has for a very long time bothered me that the average surface pressure of Mars is very near the triple point of water.

Given enough time after the proposed atmospheric collapse, the atmosphere should oscillate around a new stable situation.

Currently without knowing more, I would speculate that it oscillates around the triple point of water.  I really am not sure why.

There are two possibilities that I can think of.

1) There is no such reservoir like what you suggest, and the air has been leaking at some linear or logarithmic rate over time since the magnetic field stopped protecting the planet, and we just happened to send probes to the planet, just at the point in time where the remnant atmospheric pressure was at the triple point of water.   If this were true and remained true forward in time it should only be a relatively short period of time before Mars is as airless as the Moon (Unless there is some volcanism still).

2) There is a subsurface reservoir which keeps the atmosphere replenished at the triple point of water, and the pressure of Mars has been oscillating around that pressure for billions of years.  Possibly an impact event has temporarily modified the situation and bumped the atmospheric pressure up, but for the most part the pressure has been around 6 mb on average for quite some time.

I think that #1 is unlikely.  The chances are small.

I had considered it possible that the polar ice caps and buried ice have kept the atmosphere inflated.  However they supposedly move about from poles to Equator over time.  Maybe?

I think it is more likely that a slab of ice half the size of the planet several miles/kilometers thick, composed of water ice, CO2, and Clathrates of Nitrogen and CO2 would be able to keep that regulation going. 

Perhaps I should get off your side before I stink your work up.  I am still not satisfied I understand how #2 could work, but I really think #1 is improbable.

As for CO2 reservoirs, I recall that one of the Radar mappers found a flat surface under ice, that resembled an underground lake under ice.
But the temperatures were too cold.  I think you might want to think Carbonated water, or even liquid CO2.  Perhaps it might be.

#8455 Re: Life support systems » Potential Resources of Mars » 2015-11-06 13:56:56

I think that here could be a case for the use of extreme organisms which capture energy from the sun.

I presume a Cyanobacteria which uses sunlight for energy, and which is tolerant of normal salts, and low pressures.

So, you still must use a protection from evaporation for your briny water.  This will involve a humidity tent.  Rather than heating the entire water of a covered pond up, I would hope that during the day, primarily the bottom film of water over soil would warm much higher than the average of the pond.  The pond can be rather shallow, to allow the advantage of sunlight penetration, and to allow the harvesting off the Cyanobacteria, perhaps by a boat like robot.

I am not thinking of a Cyanobacteria to directly consume as food.

It should be possible to keep a brine pond from turning over much. 

As a protectant from UV, I suggest some type of oil film on top of the brine.  It should not degrade from digestion by organisms, if that top layer is very cold on average.  If it does, then it would be replaced.

Previous communications I have had with another indicate that a small amount of organic matter in water will absorb ultraviolet.

So, I hope to create a sunscreen for the pond that floats on top of it.  As said before it will perhaps have to be filtered/replaced periodically to maintain transparency/translucence.

As for the Cyanobacteria, itself, being a short lived organism, I would think that just by farming it this way, over time you would get mutations which are more tolerant of U.V.

Genetic engineering is an option also.

The primary purpose of the Cyanobacteria would be to harness energy from sunlight, and from added Perchlorates, and in doing so liberating metals desired from Perchlorate Salts.

They might also release Oxygen which could be harvested, but that is not a primary purpose.

If that were running, I would propose to add reasonable flows of Perchlorate salts to the pond.  Those should serve as an energy source for the cyanobacteria.  If they have the right character, they should scavenge metals from those Perchlorate salts.

The Cyanobacteria, if harvested could then be processed to remove methane.  Anaerobic digestion being one option, and the residual may then be a source of a metal desired.

It may be that nature has already concentrated salts of certain kinds at certain locations.  Otherwise concentration of salts can be done by thermal precipitation, and/or evaporation.

That is part of a way to concentrate metals.  Another part would be in the nature of the Cyanobacteria selected.

UV tolerance in alpine lakes:
http://photobiology.info/Albarracin.html

#8456 Re: Terraformation » The end of the line for Mars Terraforming? » 2015-11-06 09:15:01

This is why I want to have a full spectrum interest.  (It was here anyway).  Moon, Asteroids, Mars.

The news business makes money off of news.  This means they have to skew the news in a manic depressive way to get the most they can.
Just now they are going to run with this in the direction of depressive.

You have to expect this, and put a saddle on it, and ride it.

And your strategy for Mars has to be generalized enough to survive it.

I think the Antarctic Scientific mission model you people have provided is a logical candidate for a method which could endure such negative news.  Once you have boots on the ground, and more information and new ideas, then a pathway to terraforming of some type will emerge.

#8457 Re: Life support systems » Potential Resources of Mars » 2015-11-06 08:43:15

Nice.

I recall that if you query for saltpans on Mars you should see articles about standard salts in saltpans on the surface in the southern mid latitudes.

The Perchlorate salts however are the ones much more likely to provide extractable liquids with salts.

I have not watched this video yet, but the text tied to it is interesting for the purposes of getting metals from salts:

The world needs clean water, and more and more, we're pulling it from the oceans, desalinating it, and drinking it. But what to do with the salty brine left behind? In this intriguing short talk, TED Fellow Damian Palin proposes an idea: Mine it for other minerals we need, with the help of some collaborative metal-munching bacteria.

And here is something to connect to that:
http://www.space.com/21554-mars-toxic-p … icals.html

Smith said microbes on Earth use perchlorate for an energy source. They actually live off highly oxidized chlorine, and in reducing the chlorine down to chloride, they use the energy in that transaction to power themselves. In fact, when there's too much perchlorate in drinking water, microbes are used to clean it up, he said.

And https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_monoxide

So, a fuel from the atmosphere, can you extract it?

And an Oxidizer from the ground, brines of Perchlorates.

So, really, could you get Metals, Oxygen, Power, and even food from this?

Power:
I am thinking fuel cells where cold Perchlorate is flowed through one side, and Martian atmosphere through another.  Perhaps that will clog up your system with metals though?

Organisms.  Perhaps if you had tanks where you diluted the brines with fresh water enough for micro-organisms to tolerate it, you would do OK.  Could you use Reverse Osmosis to separate the bulk CO2 from the atmosphere, catching a gas enriched in N2, O2, and CO?

Then present that enriched gas to your micro organisms as food (The CO), and then you would have a residual of N2, which might also have O2, but maybe also Chlorine added to it.

Well, I think you see.

But if you have micro-organisms growing, and they are also giving you metals, the micro-organisms also might be useful.  For organics, plastics, maybe even food.

That would be nice, turn two poisons into life support.  CO and Perchlorate.  Your Daddy and Mommy. smile

#8458 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Profit » 2015-11-05 22:49:31

Barter, that's interesting.  It seems that before you can have a cash system, or if cash does not work, then you make deals.

I have been thinking of sources of starter cash for outer space.  Most or all are from other peoples ideas.

1) Servicing Earth Satellites.
2) Hosting Scientists sponsored by entities on Earth.  On Mars or the Moon, but most likely Mars.
3) Selling returned objects as gift items.
4) Providing transport for equipment and people.
5) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philanthropy
#5, why not.  it is a cause like save the whales or whatever, donations.
6) Getting material goods to Service Earth Satellites.  (Fuel).
7) Getting Metals down to Earth worth the bother.
8) Recreation for the wealthy, and interested types.
9) Land speculation/Lease speculation.

This is a deviation from Profits, but I think it has been established that the profit systems have to eventually tie to some cash linkages.

Any others?

#8459 Re: Life support systems » Where on Mars do you think the first Human colony would be placed... » 2015-11-05 22:24:55

If I could guess, variation of geology, should be rather important to scientists.  As well as good for material goods.
Build strength in the most friendly place, and then later expand to less easy places with an economic network, so making those locations available to deep research.

#8460 Re: Terraformation » The end of the line for Mars Terraforming? » 2015-11-05 17:34:37

Life on Mars without domes will not be a problem for people for quite some time to come anyway.

I recall that from the polar ice caps, the south cap in particular, Verified CO2 should be enough to raise the average from 5.5 to 11 mb.
This is supposed to be enough for snow, and with snow, can exist temporary melt streams.

The soil contains more if I am to believe the experts, so perhaps even though not enough for a non-pressure suit situation, enough for more permanent streams, and perhaps temporary ponds and lakes.

But I will deviate from that conversation and ask you to consider reading these references:

Deep layers of water ice and sediments over the entire northern hemisphere:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/sc … marswater/

Hypersaline Lake Nitrous Oxide Production:
Without Life:
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v3/n … eo847.html
In the presence of life at very cold temperatures:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3528574/
Nitrous Oxide Clathrates:
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/ … ad3598a587


So the first reference suggests that a "Third" reservoir of water is present.
The second and third reference suggest that Nitrous Oxide is formed in the presence of brine wetted soil.
The fourth reference suggests that Nitrous Oxide Clathrate could be present.

If this optimistic situation is true, then when the atmosphere of Mars began to thin and cool, the water pooled as ice in the northern hemisphere.  Very deep ice.  Very Very Deep.  With soil sediments being mixed in.

This process would not have been overnight.  So there would have been cold hypersaline lakes and seas, and still some snowfall, and daily or seasonal melts during transition.  This would have transported some of the atmospheric gasses into the reservoirs below.  There, perhaps action with the soil would have generated Nitrous Oxide, and cold and pressure may have preserved some of it as Clathrate.

I hate going out on a limb like this, but it appears that there are three reservoirs.

The first is the original common one, and then there was a split, where a large bulk (I hope) became buried underground, and the remainder gradually drained into space, leaving a residual atmosphere.

So the truth lies somewhere between this optimistic scenario and the scenario which was stated on the evidence of Mavin.

I am pulling for the 2 mile deep sediments of ice and soil in the Northern hemisphere, and by the way I have seen articles that indicate that it is present in the rift valley as well as part of that situation.

Imagine a system of above and below ground cities connected by buried hyperloops.

Never-the-less, although I am pulling for Mars to be a great place to set up shop, I like the Moon for reasons like this Mavin information.

#8461 Re: Life support systems » Where on Mars do you think the first Human colony would be placed... » 2015-11-04 21:31:22

OK, I am ready to try to be specific:

http://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.php … 47#p126447

http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep533/SPRING … ture19.pdf

If you scroll down to the "TES Geological Map of Mars", it appears the Louis might be right, there is a deposit of iron rich material, and interestingly it is adjacent also to a mild manifestation of dust, (I presume loose soil/dunes) and an area of Basalt Andesite.

So, I think for a first equatorial base, variety of geology in a smaller space could help provide a variety of mineral resources.  That looks like a good place.

#8462 Life support systems » Potential Resources of Mars » 2015-11-04 20:53:41

Void
Replies: 55

http://fti.neep.wisc.edu/neep533/SPRING … ture19.pdf
This looks like a nice resource.  I was looking for a reference to Copper salts on Mars and this came up.

You can open the PDF, right click the pdf text, and "Find" 'Copper'.

If you scroll down to the "TES Geological Map of Mars", it appears the Louis might be right, there is a deposit of iron rich material, and interestingly it is adjacent also to a mild manifestation of dust, (I presume loose soil/dunes) and an area of Basalt Andesite.

So, I think for a first equatorial base variety could help.  That looks like a good place.

I think the above PDF goes well with this:

http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/04/ … e-on-mars/

This applies to the top few centimeters of the Martian surface; below that, temperatures should be cool enough for the salts to remain permanently hydrated, possibly forming an extremely salty brine. Further toward the poles, humidity should reach levels where "liquid brines are abundant," according to the authors.

My interest with the above, is that if there are abundant brines in the area below the winter maximum CO2 cap, then those salts may contain many of the metals that would be wanted.  How to extract them?  Well, some must have solutions now, and then if you want something enough, then you should work on a solution for that solution (Of salts).

The reason to avoid the CO2 Snows in the winter, is because it will tend to wreck your facilities which you evacuated for the winter.

No insult to me Spacenut if you choose to get rid of it.

#8464 Re: Life support systems » An Island getaway on Mars » 2015-11-04 19:37:26

Probable unwanted help, but ....
http://www.medicaldaily.com/glass-car-w … kin-255398

What ultimately makes windshields more opaque and protective than side windows is each window’s construction. Windshields, by law, are made with laminated glass. This includes three parts: two 2.1-millimeter layers of glass separated by an 0.8-millimeter piece of flexible plastic, which is designed to minimize injury upon shattering. Due in part to the plastic, with some help from the glass’s thickness, windshields offer 50 SPF, Dishart says, near perfect protection.

Granted, likely more expensive, but the saying is you get what you pay for.

Maybe the costs can ultimately go down with 3D printing:
http://www.theverge.com/2015/8/21/91862 … ted-matter
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/54 … s-barrier/

The machine prints soda lime glass, a family of glasses used in everything from water glasses to windows. But glasses like Pyrex could in principle be printed this way too, albeit at much higher temperatures.

So how would you get the plastic layer in there?  I don't know.  How do they do it for windshields, and why does the windshield block UV?

And I am also wondering why you can't have UV colored glass, the same as you can have red or blue glass?

I'm not picking on you guys, just compulsive on these types of things I guess.

Then there is this: (Ice House)
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/nasa-picks-3d- … rs-1521885

The idea is to harness that gas, heat it up, turn it back into water and then use a robot to spray layers of water, fibre and aerogel to create an outer ice shell that freezes immediately on impact. In addition to being translucent so light can come into the conical house, the ice walls protect against radiation.

The outer ice shell is then coated in a membrane of Dyneema-reinforced EFTE plastic to prevent the ice from sublimating, and then within the ice shell, a multi-level habitat can then be built that includes personal and communal rooms, as well as a hydroponic garden to provide oxygen and food.


****************************************************

Of course the ice house will not be suitable for low latitudes.  But I wonder what the thinking would be on the EFTE plastic?  Expensive as implied in previous dialog I suppose.

I would not be the first, so I will go ahead and annoy further by saying that for my purposes, I would not want to use glass as the pressure envelope.  That is not to imply that your plans are flawed, it is just the structure I would build would not work well with it, since the solar flux could change suddenly from hot to cold and the glass would crack from thermal shock.  Left to my own devices, at this point I would want to build a cylindrical metal cage, like a corset. Anchor it to a cylindrical "Basement" buried in the soil or embanked with transported and stabilized sand dune materials.  I would place a bladder of some transparent film inside the corset, and I am currently thinking EFTE.

But I would still have a use for soda glass.  I would like to see scales manufactured from it so that they can hang off of the outside of the metal cage.  I would want them to both block the abrasiveness of wind blown dust, and to block the UV.

The reason I want the above structure is I would want to focus solar mirrors on it to increase the amount of light the "Tower" intercepts.

And just so I don't get a nasty and unfair bump for being off topic, I might want to size it up so that I could put a big island inside of it.  Or maybe not.  Not sure yet.

Point being that for places where the ground may be deep sediments and ice (Which might be most of the northern hemisphere almost down to the equator, you could place these towers at intervals and connect them with underground tunnels.  In fact the basements could be filled with water (Except for an elevator shaft), and yes! You could have a small family sized personal tropical island in each one or perhaps a giant gerbil .  A floating island!  And you could have whatever you want above in the tower which would go up rather high.  I advise against coconuts, as they might do more than bonk you on the head.

th?id=A7808f04a688cb11bc7e196a7b7dc773f&w=182&h=183&c=7&rs=1&qlt=90&pid=3.1&rm=2

I'm on topic, I'm on topic smile

Oh, if you are on a floating island which is the house you sleep in, and often dwell in and your personal tower starts to depressurize, with training, it is possible that you and your family can dive down into the flooded basement, and access breathing and other protective gear under a column of water which would of course start boiling on top and start to turn over as cold water accumulated on the top, but you might survive by your own means, or with a rescue.  I would anticipate that an alarm would go off, if the pressure started to drop, and if your people were properly trained they might have chances.


****************************************************

As penance for the above, I defer to NASA at this time, or Scientists, I'm not sure:
https://lockerdome.com/6574100214714689 … 7807034644
0be6087164b8459a8a1560285db41dd7e5728230b7feac7aadadd0e7e54a4d63_large
Yes, I believe RobertDyck that it would be hard to duplicate that with what could be done on Mars, but it is still and interesting article.

#8465 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Profit » 2015-11-04 15:31:53

I'm not ignoring you Tom, but RobertDyck's commentary seems rather useful.  I was looking for another layer of business advice, and I am then reminded that he is indeed a businessman. smile

So, perhaps we could call money "Virtual Profits".  A representation of profits surrendered for it's symbolic representation of value.  Those are trusted to varying degrees.

So, recently models posed for the obtainment of a "Money" (Which I think could now be like Gold, Paper Currency, or BitCoin).

The two models so far that I have noticed from other members are being paid to transport people or supplies between planets, and hosting scientific researchers, curiosities shipped back to Earth, along with samples.

Although the Moon could be, and was seen as a diversion from a 1st expedition to Mars, it now appears to me that it is an asset to the purpose of turning a profit from Mars (And the Moon).

It is interesting that when we hear the news, about wars, they talk about getting intelligence from the war zone.  I think they should get their intelligence from their minds, and get information from the war zone.

The original information on the Moon was "Dry"  nothing to get for an expedition except maybe liquid Oxygen.  To do that you would need to land fuel.  Not worth it.

Now the information is different, where possibly the Moon is much more Mars like, and perhaps even more Earth like than was assumed.

So in a business calculation designed to weave the Mars story into a pattern of profit and cash flows, the new information should be considered.

Some items of new information are:
1) There is probably more Hydrogen on the Moon than was supposed, therefore more fuel, perhaps even in more convenient locations.
2) It seems that metals can be used to propel electric rockets with great efficiency.
3) Because of 1 & 2 it may be more economical to get special materials from the Moon to Earth orbit, and to the Earth itself.

1 indicates that you can do life support on the Moon, and launch chemical rockets from it.
2 indicates that you should be able to service the satellite network around the Earth in part with propulsion from metal plasma.
1 & 2 suggest that in addition to supporting #3, they might support commerce with Mars.

So now instead of refueling satellites with water derived fuels from asteroids, you might use electric tugs to move satellites, and to move repair and upgrade methods to those satellites.

There are some cash redeemable services available in 1, 2, and 3.

Now how to weave Mars into the mix?

***I think NASA should go ahead and get the boulder off an asteroid, there are various reasons to do it, some of them involving insurance to protect asset on the Earth, around the Earth, and in the future in deep space.  It will be good information, it is an intelligent thing to do.
And with or without the Moon, it may be good practice for a mission to Mars.

Mars has some things to offer:
1) Information.
2) A promise.

It has been proposed by others that support from university systems could be a source of cash.
Robert has mentioned children in a profitable family situation.  I mentioned the round about way to profits.

A child is an investment, however you want to look at it.  It is generally expected that the average child will generate profit during it's lifetime.  If this is not the information gathered, the social pressures are applied to change that feedback of information.

A Mars colony will be able to expect some donated money.  From various entities that want to see it succeed.

And then there is 3D printing.  As long as the Mars colony does not manufacture goods to compete with 3D printed goods on Earth, and the Moon, I don't expect copywrite to be an obstacle to people on Mars getting any software to manufacture what they want.  So, it may be true that it will not be nearly as hard to get finished goods on Mars as may be thought.

So, I feel that Mars as an Antarctica as others have suggested should be the model.  5000 people would be a great achievement, and even perhaps a insurance policy for the human race, particularly if there were also a small population on the Moon(And other places).

I think the plan is worthwhile and could turn a profit at specific locations, and eventually be sizable with a network of cash flows between worlds.

I will be happy if I will be supplemented or corrected on what I have suggested.

#8466 Re: Water on Mars » mars-water-discovery-curiosity-rover » 2015-11-04 13:55:31

Curiosity finds evidence of a daily water cycle on Mars

http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/04/ … e-on-mars/

Conditions allow salts in the soil to pull water from the atmosphere

Just thought it would not hurt to have this reference here:

A huge range of data indicates that water has played a key part in the history of Mars, from entire oceans in the distant past, to evidence of lakes and streams at the landing site of the Curiosity rover. But what has not been clear is the role that water plays on the planet now. Hints of water activity have been spotted from orbit, but direct detection of liquid water on the surface has been elusive.

This week, a scientific team using data from the Curiosity rover has announced a bit more indirect evidence. Based on a combination of data about Martian weather and soil conditions, the researchers conclude that salts found on Mars can pull water out of the thin atmosphere and may drive a daily water cycle. While the evidence is indirect, it's consistent with data from a Russian instrument that registers indications of water molecules in the soil.

One of the more common chemicals in the Martian soil appears to be perchlorate salts, which have been detected from orbit and found by the Phoenix lander. These salts—calcium perchlorate in particular—readily form hydrates, where water molecules are integrated into the crystal structure itself to form an energetically favorable conformation. On Earth, this transition is so favorable that the salts can readily pull water out of the air on humid days.

While Mars also has water present, most of what we've been able to detect is locked up in the form of ice. One possible source is the thin atmosphere, which carries small amounts of water. But humidity levels would have to reach a minimal threshold before the atmosphere carried enough water to start donating it to the salts. And both remote sensing and atmospheric models suggested that the threshold would only ever be crossed near the poles. There, cold conditions would lower the amount of water the atmosphere can carry, meaning the same amount of water vapor leads to a higher relative humidity.

Curiosity has the advantage of carrying a Martian weather station and so is able to directly measure the conditions at Gale Crater, which is near the Martian equator. It finds that, throughout the Martian winter, the site would have a night-time relative humidity that's sufficient for perchlorate salts to latch on to water molecules. As the temperature warms during the day, the salts would give up the water to the atmosphere again, creating a water cycle. There are some indications from other sites that this cycle may create enough liquid that salts will gradually flow deeper into the soil.

This applies to the top few centimeters of the Martian surface; below that, temperatures should be cool enough for the salts to remain permanently hydrated, possibly forming an extremely salty brine. Further toward the poles, humidity should reach levels where "liquid brines are abundant," according to the authors.

Another instrument on board, the Dynamic Albedo of Neutrons (provided by the Russian space agency), found that the levels of water in the soil correlated with the atmosphere's relative humidity. And measurements of the local water vapor went down at night when the rover was over sandy soil, suggesting that some process was drawing water out of the atmosphere under these conditions. So everything appears to line up with the basic idea.

The authors consider these findings in light of what we know about microbial growth on Earth, as some species (notably the purple ones) can thrive in high salt conditions. But it turns out that life on Mars faces a bit of a catch-22. The conditions that are favorable to putting more water in the soil are the colder ones, which boost relative humidity. Unfortunately, these conditions are so cold that metabolism completely shuts down in any life on Earth.

This causes me to wonder if there could be a "Sweet Spot" where abundant brines collect near the surface, if that spot could be at lower latitudes than the winter extent of the CO2 ice cap.  If so, then I might ponder if it could be possible to establish a secondary base at a latitude higher than a presumed "First Base" near the equator.

If so, then it would not be dependent on mining ice to get a good water supply, and in addition perhaps the salts could be "Mined" to extract desired substances such as Calcium or Magnesium, or could there be some "Copper salts"?  Don't know, but that would be nice smile

#8467 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Profit » 2015-11-04 13:41:11

I am going to try to behave myself, I do like you, but I am going to have to smurf you bit on this.

Just focusing on the Rocks, which did not contain many gold coins ($0.00), we could argue that your very best friends the Soviets had a better plan.

In their plan very little risk to human life was exhibited, and they did get samples.

But with humans landing on the Moon God's will was demonstrated.  I suppose that sounds funny to you.  But I am older.  I recall being in church as a boy and hearing the minister (A very nice man), preach that "God would never allow man to land on the Moon".  Well, apparently God didn't mind, at least not so far.  And he and others like him could no longer cite Gods potential anger as a reason not to go into space. 

So did we profit from that?  How much?  How much will depend on if we survive as a kind, and if that kind is able to access those resources in space.

RobertDyck plants his greenhouse, and 1 week later he has not harvested a crop, did he engage in an unprofitable and foolish thing?

By the way, if he does wait until he gets a crop, and is successful in getting one, has he made a profit?

From my first post of this thread:

Profit is reflected in reduction in liabilities, increase in assets, and/or increase in owners' equity. It furnishes resources for investing in future operations, and its absence may result in the extinction of a company. As an indicator of comparative performance, however, it is less valuable than return on investment (ROI). Also called earnings, gain, or income.

I don't think it hurts to work this over, since many here want to sponsor space on "Profit", I guess I and perhaps others might try to get a better perception of what it is.  Actually I am messing with you guys on this not to teach, but to learn.  Also to learn, if perhaps I am wrong.

Just for fun, here is a book reference:
http://www.audible.com/pd/Nonfiction/Th … aQodjFILdA

Long story short, the "Round about way", requires that you take some losses in a way to gain a favorable position, in order to be ready to benefit from being situated for what may come.

#8468 Re: Life support systems » Where on Mars do you think the first Human colony would be placed... » 2015-11-03 16:17:24

Well Spacenut, I goofed up, I partially posted my answer to your 2nd to last post at another location.  But your last post there involved both Mars and the Moon, so maybe you will forgive me for posting this whole thing.  If not, let me know and I will remove references to the Moon as much as I can.

I don't know what to think about the acid mist.  There are a lot of things we still need to learn about Mars, it appears.

Replicated from:::⦁    » ⦁    Moon Detour, Ballistic Capture, Perhaps also Semi-Cyclers

Offline
#17 Today 20:29:50
Void
Member
Registered: 2011-12-29
Posts: 983
Re: Moon Detour, Ballistic Capture, Perhaps also Semi-Cyclers
I liked both of your posts Spacenut, good stuff. Thankfully this thread has a dual topic, since we may consider the Moon to be a resource to facilitate access to Mars.
I am going to respond in reverse order, Mars first, then the Moon.
Mars: (I really feel this is a good one!)
http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/04/ … e-on-mars/

THESE ARE QUOTES:
Curiosity finds evidence of a daily water cycle on Mars
Conditions allow salts in the soil to pull water from the atmosphere
Curiosity has the advantage of carrying a Martian weather station and so is able to directly measure the conditions at Gale Crater, which is near the Martian equator. It finds that, throughout the Martian winter, the site would have a night-time relative humidity that's sufficient for perchlorate salts to latch on to water molecules. As the temperature warms during the day, the salts would give up the water to the atmosphere again, creating a water cycle. There are some indications from other sites that this cycle may create enough liquid that salts will gradually flow deeper into the soil.
This applies to the top few centimeters of the Martian surface; below that, temperatures should be cool enough for the salts to remain permanently hydrated, possibly forming an extremely salty brine. Further toward the poles, humidity should reach levels where "liquid brines are abundant," according to the authors.

END QUOTES


Extremely salty brine may not be directly available near the equator, but it sounds like hydrated calcium perchlorate could exist a few centimeters down. This should be good news for those who might hope to make Martian cement I think???
Anyway, I am going to try to suggest how a machine might pull that moisture up from down there.
1) A cart with multiple wheels. 4? 6?
2) Wheels having a wick like electrically compatible material as the tread surface.
3) A temporary tank to store gathered liquid water in.
* I will end the numbered list now and describe a whole machine that I think has chances.
The cart will operate during the day primarily, powered from solar panels most likely.
The first thing it will do is suck in air and pull electrons from it. That electron depleted air will be heated and expelled as a positively charged plume. The heating process is intended to cause the plume to rise away from the cart, rather then to contact the carts wheels.
The electrons collected will be given a path to the wheels of the cart, so that the wick-tread will be given a negative electrical charge. Relative to the positive plume and also relative to the average ground of the "ground" itself, and the general atmosphere.
U.V. light flux can be expected to react to the surface of the soil, where it should accelerate evaporation from the soil (I am thinking of humidity clinging to mineral grains, and any salt film, I am not thinking of a soil that would be expected to be wet).
Another effect of the U.V. light flux should be to ionize some of the water vapor. Positive Ions should contain Hydrogen, I think.
So, I am hoping to stimulate a ion flow into the tread of the wheels, I am anticipating that the cart will also travel, therefore exposing the wheel treads to fresh soil, as the previous soil is depleted of available positive ions.
You have an electric circuit, where the positive plume is the (+) and the electrons on the wheel tread are the (-). I do not want the electrons to travel in this circuit much beyond the wheels, but they might to some degree. That may not be fatal to the process.
So the Ions (I hope) will flow into the wheel tread. Here we might hope to use a vacuum to pluck them away. To make it effective, I hope that the wick of the tread will be joined to a continuation of the wick which will continue into a vacuum chamber for each wheel in the hubs.
Of course that vacuum chamber hub join will have to have a seal which allows the wheel to rotate, and allows (+) ions to flow into the hub,
and which serves as a restriction to unimpeded flow of atmosphere into the hub. Inside the hub will be the actual source of the electrons, and the (+) Ions will be given (-) electrons to satisfy them. If it is proven to be helpful, the interior of the hub can be heated as well to facilitate the plucking of water vapor molecules from the wick surface of the interior of the hub. Here, perhaps actually a light bulb would work, or perhaps a heat source similar to a soldering iron.
The pressure inside the hub, being significantly below ambient outside, and the temperature inside the hub being elevated, I would expect all water vapor collected to be present as a vapor. The vapor sucked into the pump would then be pressurized on the exhaust side of the air pump, and condensation methods would be employed to convert it to a liquid.
Perhaps daily, the cart would pull up to a master container, which is to contain water ice. It would have a means to discharge it's content into the master reservoir where it is desired it to will freeze. Of course this will require some type of co-ordination with the night cycle where cold temperatures for freezing will occur, and of course it will require fittings/doors suitable to discourage water losses to the atmosphere.
This may suit your desire to have water collected prior to human arrival, and of course it should still work after their arrival.
As for major sand dunes, that would be somewhat different, and not required for some time I think, since if water can be collected and the inhabitants have abilities to recycle, such vast quantities of water will not be needed at first. If this machine works, then perhaps it will never be done.
As for magnetic and non magnetic native metal fragments, collection of those may also be done with a cart.
Of course what I am trying to build on is methods which were reported to have worked. A plough blade charged with a negative charge, can be lubricated with water by putting a negative charge on it even in a seeming dry soil, and the water ions are attracted to the negative charge.
I am not saying the Mars analog is guaranteed to work, but it, or something like it may work for the desired effect.


The Moon:
Per the information supplied about the Moon, I suggest that the Moon might become a paying enterprise where you would first start with prospecting for concentrations of water bearing rocks, or valuable metal chunks. They are not likely to occur in the same locations it would seem.
Next robots with rakes and brushes deployed to those sites. The intention being to build a linear path where small materials/dust are swept to one side, and rocks are raked to the other. During this process a video recording may be useful. If certain alarms are triggered, notations of rocks of potential significance noted, and that information alarmed for.
As for the dust, it may be possible to extract magnetic and non-magnetic concentrations of metals from the dust during the sweeping.
Notable rocks would be metals, quartz, and perhaps hydrogen containing rocks.
Metals may be magnetic or non-magnetic (Even more valuable)
Robots may be able to collect those into appropriate bins.
Even more notable would be rocks which could have been ejected from the Earth during it's multi-billion year history. Those will be very valuable and I am sure scientists will want at least some of them.
I have previously proposed a different kind of spacesuit which would, I think be very suitable to what comes next. However, any suit desired can be contemplated. A lying down position (On a wheeled cart) will allow a human to investigate the row of rocks that were created by, in particular those which might be ejected by Earth.
The suit I suggested should allow a person doing that job to take a break, and do bodily functions. Eating/Elimiations/Naping, and little or no using diapers to deal with body functions.
So, with these methods, extracted and concentrated Hydro/Carbons, Metals for construction, Metals to ship back to Earth, Quartz or use ?,
and perhaps special rocks that came from the Earth.
By borrowing ideas from others about Mars, I would think that this process might be partially financed by Universities if they are given sole ownership of the rocks that are of interest to them.
Obviously a prosperous Moon operation might base a Mars operation. I have become convinced that most likely a Mars operation will resemble operations on Earth in Antarctica, for quite some time, unless there is a decision that Mars cannot have life now.
The point being that the Moon would be ours to play with until that day, and yet the Moon would also hasten the day that life would either be found on Mars, or a decision was made that "Enough is enough!", life is very unlikely.
Last edited by Void (Today 21:36:10)

#8469 Re: Martian Politics and Economy » Profit » 2015-11-03 15:40:31

In my view it profited the human race that we landed people on the Moon at all.  And then again, it also slowed things down from cost after that. 

I am beginning to see that the word "Profit" is usable in many contexts, and a rational discussion on the topic may be very hard to achieve due that that since each person may what to use the word in a way that suits their opinion.

#8470 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Moon Detour, Ballistic Capture, Perhaps also Semi-Cyclers » 2015-11-03 14:29:50

I liked both of your posts Spacenut, good stuff.  Thankfully this thread has a dual topic, since we may consider the Moon to be a resource to facilitate access to Mars.

I am going to respond in reverse order, Mars first, then the Moon.
Mars: (I really feel this is a good one!)
http://arstechnica.com/science/2015/04/ … e-on-mars/

Curiosity finds evidence of a daily water cycle on Mars

Conditions allow salts in the soil to pull water from the atmosphere

Curiosity has the advantage of carrying a Martian weather station and so is able to directly measure the conditions at Gale Crater, which is near the Martian equator. It finds that, throughout the Martian winter, the site would have a night-time relative humidity that's sufficient for perchlorate salts to latch on to water molecules. As the temperature warms during the day, the salts would give up the water to the atmosphere again, creating a water cycle. There are some indications from other sites that this cycle may create enough liquid that salts will gradually flow deeper into the soil.

This applies to the top few centimeters of the Martian surface; below that, temperatures should be cool enough for the salts to remain permanently hydrated, possibly forming an extremely salty brine. Further toward the poles, humidity should reach levels where "liquid brines are abundant," according to the authors.

Extremely salty brine may not be directly available near the equator, but it sounds like hydrated calcium perchlorate  could exist a few centimeters down.  This should be good news for those who might hope to make Martian cement I think???

Anyway, I am going to try to suggest how a machine might pull that moisture up from down there.

1) A cart with multiple wheels.  4? 6?
2) Wheels having a wick like electrically compatible material as the tread surface.
3) A temporary tank to store gathered liquid water in.

* I will end the numbered list now and describe a whole machine that I think has chances.

The cart will operate during the day primarily, powered from solar panels most likely.
The first thing it will do is suck in air and pull electrons from it.  That electron depleted air will be heated and expelled as a positively charged plume.  The heating process is intended to cause the plume to rise away from the cart, rather then to contact the carts wheels.
The electrons collected will be given a path to the wheels of the cart, so that the wick-tread will be given a negative electrical charge. Relative to the positive plume and also relative to the average ground of the "ground" itself, and the general atmosphere.

U.V. light flux can be expected to react to the surface of the soil, where it should accelerate evaporation from the soil (I am thinking of humidity clinging to mineral grains, and any salt film, I am not thinking of a soil that would be expected to be wet).
Another effect of the U.V. light flux should be to ionize some of the water vapor.  Positive Ions should contain Hydrogen, I think.

So, I am hoping to stimulate a ion flow into the tread of the wheels, I am anticipating that the cart will also travel, therefore exposing the wheel treads to fresh soil, as the previous soil is depleted of available positive ions.

You have an electric circuit, where the positive plume is the (+) and the electrons on the wheel tread are the (-).  I do not want the electrons to travel in this circuit much beyond the wheels, but they might to some degree.  That may not be fatal to the process.
So the Ions (I hope) will flow into the wheel tread.  Here we might hope to use a vacuum to pluck them away.  To make it effective, I hope that the wick of the tread will be joined to a continuation of the wick which will continue into a vacuum chamber for each wheel in the hubs.

Of course that vacuum chamber hub join will have to have a seal which allows the wheel to rotate, and allows (+) ions to flow into the hub,
and which serves as a restriction to unimpeded flow of atmosphere into the hub.  Inside the hub will be the actual source of the electrons, and the (+) Ions will be given (-) electrons to satisfy them.  If it is proven to be helpful, the interior of the hub can be heated as well to facilitate the plucking of water vapor molecules from the wick surface of the interior of the hub.  Here, perhaps actually a light bulb would work, or perhaps a heat source similar to a soldering iron.

The pressure inside the hub, being significantly below ambient outside, and the temperature inside the hub being elevated, I would expect all water vapor collected to be present as a vapor.  The vapor sucked into the pump would then be pressurized on the exhaust side of the air pump, and condensation methods would be employed to convert it to a liquid.

Perhaps daily, the cart would pull up to a master container, which is to contain water ice.  It would have a means to discharge it's content into the master reservoir where it is desired it to will freeze.  Of course this will require some type of co-ordination with the night cycle where cold temperatures for freezing will occur, and of course it will require fittings/doors suitable to discourage water losses to the atmosphere.

This may suit your desire to have water collected prior to human arrival, and of course it should still work after their arrival.

As for major sand dunes, that would be somewhat different, and not required for some time I think, since if water can be collected and the inhabitants have abilities to recycle, such vast quantities of water will not be needed at first.  If this machine works, then perhaps it will never be done.

As for magnetic and non magnetic native metal fragments, collection of those may also be done with a cart.

Of course what I am trying to build on is methods which were reported to have worked.  A plough blade charged with a negative charge, can be lubricated with water by putting a negative charge on it even in a seeming dry soil, and the water ions are attracted to the negative charge.

I am not saying the Mars analog is guaranteed to work, but it, or something like it may work for the desired effect.



The Moon:

Per the information supplied about the Moon, I suggest that the Moon might become a paying enterprise where you would first start with prospecting for concentrations of water bearing rocks, or valuable metal chunks.  They are not likely to occur in the same locations it would seem.

Next robots with rakes and brushes deployed to those sites.  The intention being to build a linear path where small materials/dust are swept to one side, and rocks are raked to the other.  During this process a video recording may be useful.  If certain alarms are triggered, notations of rocks of potential significance noted, and that information alarmed for.

As for the dust, it may be possible to extract magnetic and non-magnetic concentrations of metals from the dust during the sweeping.

Notable rocks would be metals, quartz, and perhaps hydrogen containing rocks.

Metals may be magnetic or non-magnetic (Even more valuable)

Robots may be able to collect those into appropriate bins.

Even more notable would be rocks which could have been ejected from the Earth during it's multi-billion year history.  Those will  be very valuable and I am sure scientists will want at least some of them.

I have previously proposed a different kind of spacesuit which would, I think be very suitable to what comes next.  However, any suit desired can be contemplated.  A lying down position (On a wheeled cart) will allow a human to investigate the row of rocks that were created by, in particular those which might be ejected by Earth. 

The suit I suggested should allow a person doing that job to take a break, and do bodily functions.  Eating/Elimiations/Naping, and little or no using diapers to deal with body functions.

So, with these methods, extracted and concentrated Hydro/Carbons, Metals for construction, Metals to ship back to Earth, Quartz or use ?,
and perhaps special rocks that came from the Earth.

By borrowing ideas from others about Mars, I would think that this process might be partially financed by Universities if they are given sole ownership of the rocks that are of interest to them.

Obviously a prosperous Moon operation might base a Mars operation.  I have become convinced that most likely a Mars operation will resemble operations on Earth in Antarctica, for quite some time, unless there is a decision that Mars cannot have life now. 

The point being that the Moon would be ours to play with until that day, and yet the Moon would also hasten the day that life would either be found on Mars, or a decision was made that "Enough is enough!", life is very unlikely.

#8471 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Moon Detour, Ballistic Capture, Perhaps also Semi-Cyclers » 2015-11-02 18:19:02

That's major nice good news Antius.  It also shows the value of having people with a different cultural perspective, or at least multiple groups look and the same problem and try to puzzle it out.

I agree with your evaluation as well.

It would be easy to criticize the current efforts to slant at Mars alone and to almost make the Moon a leper.
At the time for the information they had, their evaluation was not that unreasonable.  (Not beyond question however).

I feel that even NASA is trying to update that now, as they are interested in asteroid mining, and even Bolden said the Moon was not off limits.

I myself also have a bad feeling towards what I see as an evolving "Mars Roach Motel Syndrome".  Say for instance RobertDycks possible frozen sea.  An outflow of melted water from underground.  If there were a place to hope to find evidence of life from underground, there it is.  Just prove the ice is there, and then land a probe and drop a nuclear melt device with instrumentation that can find the life.

Wait, you can't clean up your probes for a reasonable price.  OK, so you did make expensive probes, you proved the water was there, and then you dug a hole in the dirt and dropped a nuclear probe in there to melt it's way through the ice to the bottom.  Lots and Lots of expense if it could even be done.  It does not find life.  However, was the probe functioning properly?  Did it look in the right places?
Send another one.  Nope, no life, but does that prove that there is no life in that sea?  Does it prove that Mars has no life?

Well even if the money were ever put up to do that study, 100 years later, Cyborg life extended Antius is starting to get mad, because it is still forbidden to use Mars.

And then what if they do find inconclusive or conclusive evidence of life on Mars?

And then there are the financing pork barrel upsets that happen periodically and seem to always mutate a plan into something that is half retarded, because it is something like what was originally intended but cutbacks have caused limitations on abilities to be imposed.

I am not interested in being harsh on those who made the decision to make the Moon taboo, but of course new information has indicated that that verdict should be reconsidered.  I do not propose that a new pork barrel reshuffle be pushed over this, rather I propose that we should get prepared for it's inevitable arrival, and be ready to try to make the future decisions on things better.

The thing I see about the Moon that really attracts me is with the upgrades such as you have alerted readers to, it is reasonable to suppose a human/machine pyramid to the Moon.

Lets say for each person working on the surface, 900 machines run by operators from Earth and the machines own A.I.  These having a 3 second time delay.  Then 99 machines run by operators in a base on the surface of the Moon (Well protected).  Time delays for these much less than one second.  Then one person in a space suit on the surface of the Moon.

Certainly those numbers can be altered, but I think you can see where I am going.  You might get lot done and not need that much in dangerous outside activity.

The Moon base(s) could be built to be pretty safe, and with lots of recycling.  As for body damage from low gee, do it first find out what the problems magnitude is, then adjust the plan to compensate.

Tom had suggested somewhere in this thread that yes there could be good asteroid materials to mine.  (I was not too supportive) but yes!

And with this plan, rockets can be kept to minimum use.  I know that some are saying get chemical rocket fuels from the Moon for space travel, and sure do that if it makes sense.  however, if you have electric rockets that propel with metals, and perhaps Mass drivers that propel with Oxygen (Or something else), well you just might be able to "Project" your propulsion mass to receivers not on the Moon.

So rockets would be to transport people, and maybe to move Platinum group metals to the Earth.


A Segway:

If the logic of asteroid dust (And chunks) being on the Moon with water and special metals is true as the article suggests, this might make it reasonable to hope that their could be minority particles in Mars dust/sand dunes that are very desirable types of non-ferrous metals.
I might fear that those would have been Oxidized, but it is worth a look.  If they were there, they could be extracted by first removing the ferrous metals using steady magnetic fields, then we might hope to use an inductive magnetic field to attract the non ferrous metal particles.  Maybe a pipe dream, but as I said worth a look I think.

#8472 Re: Interplanetary transportation » Moon Detour, Ballistic Capture, Perhaps also Semi-Cyclers » 2015-11-02 09:58:11

Well thanks Antius.  Your ideas are valued.

Without disrespect I don't care what Zubrin prefers.  The Mars dream belongs to many other people than him.

Actually the Oxygen source from the Moon is now the lesser concern for me.  That is if you already have a base(s) on the Moon which you may project metals to orbit from for the propulsion method I previously mentioned, you might as well want to send out Oxygen as well.

But I am most interested in "Matter Projectors" if that is possible.  Of course the method I proposed is extremely vague.  More or less turning an ion engine that projects metal ions backwards and using it to launch metal ions to a capture method.  The capture method still has to be created/proven.

I am a Moon bug just now.  I reserve the right to change my mind later, but I consider on a great deal of evidence that there has been a conspiracy to keep people involved in thinking of ways to access space, but to also prevent it from actually happening.  The reason being that there are too many interests who want to profit off of the pork barrel, and who want to adapt ideas created to make money for themselves on Earth.  So, I see Mars as it is presently planned as possible to happen, but more likely to have the rug pulled out from under it at various points to prolong the time that it will take for it to happen, for the reasons I have mentioned.

Asteroid mining might happen in the mean time if there is money in it for big money entities, but other than that, I see that the intent is to waste our time, but pretend to be at the forefront of human advancement, while keeping their hands in the till.

I think the Moon may provide opportunity to break that cycle because too many international interests have ideas about accessing it.
I see the likelihood that virtual reality/telepresence(Augmented by A.I) machines operated by a large number of humans on Earth may be able to support a human population on the Moon who could indeed provide support for methods to access at least the inner solar system.

I think this could happen in my lifetime.  As for Mars, without delays, I might see images of people prancing around a flag on Mars, while someone is changing my diaper in the nursing home, but that is only if they don't pull one of their standard delay moves.  I have been around far too long to not notice the pattern.

So, I prefer to be a Moon Bug, but will be glad to see asteroid mining, or a trip to Mars.  Just believe we are being played with on the trip to Mars thing.  Would also be happy to see extraction of materials from the Earths upper Atmosphere.

Just have no choice at this point but to see the "Mars Dream" as real, but it's implementation as being on the level of the Easter Bunny.

#8473 Re: Life support systems » Where on Mars do you think the first Human colony would be placed... » 2015-11-01 19:47:15

Thank You Spacenut and Louis for very civil responses.

That soil looks more easy to dig Spacenut, you could likely employ a relatively simple robot to extract a small amount of magnetic iron/nickel from that soil, most likely there will be some so thanks.

Louis,  You and I might be converging on the notion of moisture.  Again, I suggest that a vacuum cleaner with a pressurized spray nozzle might allow a robot to inhale small grains which might be Ubiquitous to the surface of Mars, and might on occasion pile up into dunes.
An easy product to try to extract might be moisture (We hope).  I hadn't though of small quantities of water being bound as ice.  That could be true.  I had rather though of it being bound to salts in the soil, and also to hydrated minerals, and then there are situations where water vapor can be bound to mineral grains.  Usually Silica.  However Silica may be a minority content, and Basalt grains more prevalent.  I do not know about grain binding in Basalt sand in dry conditions, but it is something I might want to know.

Some vague reference to water bound to mineral grains:
https://books.google.com/books?id=JbGL9 … ns&f=false
But I think we can both agree that for the start water bound to soil may very well be sufficient.

Going forward to expansion (And profit smile), a large dune or a buried ice body or an accessible aquifer may be desired.

I am open to options on that.  I really think we start with some type of soil process, and move on to grown up water later.

For Iron, and other metals, lets investigate the dunes/soil, and lets also get your ore deposits, lets see if we can get our metals either way, and then depending on the tools and situation the people who must survive have every right to choose the best deal for themselves, and I will welcome your method as well as what I suggest, I just want to put that suggestion on the table.  I am grasping at straws, but I am hoping that some of the metal grains in dunes will be for other metals of much greater value.  A long shot, but well worth having a look for.
After all grains of various sorts have been raining down on Mars from the asteroid belt for billions of years?

I will make note that if you can vacuum up mineral grains, and suspend them in a air column and then expose those suspended grains to concentrated solar energy, you may raise those individual grains to very high temperatures.  This is different than heating a bucket of dirt, and may be much more suitable to automation/robots. smile

#8474 Martian Politics and Economy » Profit » 2015-11-01 13:35:30

Void
Replies: 17

Didn't like some ones definition of Profit.  I have been selective, but here is the one I decided to produce:

http://www.businessdictionary.com/defin … rofit.html

profit


The surplus remaining after total costs are deducted from total revenue, and the basis on which tax is computed and dividend is paid. It is the best known measure of success in an enterprise.

Profit is reflected in reduction in liabilities, increase in assets, and/or increase in owners' equity. It furnishes resources for investing in future operations, and its absence may result in the extinction of a company. As an indicator of comparative performance, however, it is less valuable than return on investment (ROI). Also called earnings, gain, or income.


Read more: http://www.businessdictionary.com/defin … z3qGojFte7

So, if you made automation which could extract a material from a dune, such as water, or Metals, that could qualify as an increase in assets, and could furnish resources for investing in future operations.  And it might prevent the extinction of the company.

Trade with the Earth using its paper currencies will also be important, but yes you can make a profit or suffer a loss without it, if you are operating on Mars.  Same with a greenhouse.  Planting is investing.  Tending is protecting your investments, and harvesting is profiting from your investments and efforts.  If your crops fail, then you have suffered a loss.

But its all OK.  You let me express myself.  I am sure you can give me a few hand bites if you want to as well.  My armor is not without faults.

Take care, until next time (I bother you).

#8475 Re: Life support systems » Where on Mars do you think the first Human colony would be placed... » 2015-11-01 13:23:10

Well, I was nasty Spacenut,

SpaceNutModeratorFrom: New HampshireRegistered: 2004-07-22Posts: 7,189Email

Re: Where on Mars do you think the first Human colony would be placed...



Void wrote:



I know NASA currently disapproves of sand dunes because they like to eat their rovers, but I see a small one in the link above.
The reason I am so interested in sand dunes, is I speculate that the processing of their content into desired materials might lend itself to scalable automation.
Eventually machines that eat (Shovel or vacuum it in) sand dunes, and leave behind material concentrates, and built structures.  If necessary, water might be extracted from them.  Automation increases profits, and profits are the difference between suffering and death vs prosperity.

Sounds good to process the sand for water, but we have put in energy to do this process; so what would you do with it then? We must look at these secondary uses so as to not waste.
Depending on the chemical analysis we could make building blocks, glass and create the refined metals or chemicals for later use in other processes by further processing.

My reply to this was unfair.  A bit of drink I am afraid to have to confess.  You should not have to fear that I will bite your hand off, and in fact I am more or less now a Moon bug.  However I will answer, and you may choose to not respond, I don't have a problem with that.

The dust/sand if it is like the tested soils should have about 2% water in it.  If you are by a dune, you would have water (If that is true).  It would have to be tested further.

Also there should be magnetic material in the dust/sand, (Meteor Material) and it should be relatively easy to concentrate that.  I do understand that others would like to mine ore bodies, but I have worked in such mining.

1) Blast
2) Haul big and little chunks to a coarse crusher.
3) Next a fine crusher.
4) Next a rod mill (A wet process by the way)
5) Next a ball mill (Another wet process).

Then you have a rock powder where you can extract the material with more magnetic characteristics from the metal with less.

But in a dune on Mars, nature has already given you the results of all 5 steps.

You would have to find a dry way to extract the magnetic materials, but it should be possible.  You would likely use a moving permanent magnet or something simulating that.

After that you might try using a alternating magnetic field on the "Tailings", in the hope that their might be some non-ferrous metal particles, which could be extracted by induced magnetism.

Then the tailings could be discarded, or perhaps sintered into building materials.  Perhaps whole buildings.

Any of the dune material could be baked for water.  (I hope).

Other uses for the particles would be to make building materials by adding a glue.

Or you might feed the particles into a machine that makes mineral wool, and so then use the glue to make fiberglass.

I have seen the pictures of Mars, and it looks to me that their is hard packed surface that looks like broken pavement, and there are dunes.

NASA does not like the dunes because they are a hazard to the rovers.  However if I were put outside with a shovel, I would rather shovel the dune material into a container, than to try to work the "Broken Pavement" surface.

However, it should be possible to design a vacuum system that would ingest dune material.  Perhaps using a pressurized jet first to fluidize it.  From there, a continuous process to extract what is desired.

However, I want RobertDycks frozen sea.

I will leave you with that.  Not going to stick around and give more hand bites.

I might show up here an there, but hope to be null and void for the most part.

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB