You are not logged in.
Photolysis on the surface of planets:
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep13977
So, here is a catalist
The search for habitable exoplanets in the Universe is actively ongoing in the field of astronomy. The biggest future milestone is to determine whether life exists on such habitable exoplanets. In that context, oxygen in the atmosphere has been considered strong evidence for the presence of photosynthetic organisms. In this paper, we show that a previously unconsidered photochemical mechanism by titanium (IV) oxide (titania) can produce abiotic oxygen from liquid water under near ultraviolet (NUV) lights on the surface of exoplanets. Titania works as a photocatalyst to dissociate liquid water in this process. This mechanism offers a different source of a possibility of abiotic oxygen in atmospheres of exoplanets from previously considered photodissociation of water vapor in upper atmospheres by extreme ultraviolet (XUV) light. Our order-of-magnitude estimation shows that possible amounts of oxygen produced by this abiotic mechanism can be comparable with or even more than that in the atmosphere of the current Earth, depending on the amount of active surface area for this mechanism. We conclude that titania may act as a potential source of false signs of life on habitable exoplanets.
Point being if you have an envelop of plastic, that endures U.V. but lets it through into the interior of the envelop, yes without sunblock that is bad for plants and for you, but if your objective might be to produce variations of Hydrogen and Oxygen, then using Titanium Oxide (Titania), maybe good.
Your envelop does not have to be very pressurized, just add some water vapor. In fact I suppose that during certain times of the day if temps are above freezing at the triple point of water it can be entirely filled with water vapor. Or you might choose to have another gas present such as CO2 or N2 as it might suit your purposes.
Oh well, now I am imagining myself on the surface of Mars, a water spout rising so high in the sky that I have to tip my head back.
The method to produce it;
-A melted reservoir or a river induced from an ice body such as the southern ice cap.
-Instead of photocell, rather simple solar concentrating mirrors. Perhaps a solar tower with heliostats.
In the case of an ice covered reservoir as the source of water, some steam is shunted back to it to melt it bigger.
Most or all of the rest of the water is simply vaporized in the tower, turning turbines with superheated steam, and released. Of course except for twinkle you would not be able to see the steam until some portion of it began to condensate into ice particles or in a denser atmosphere droplets. Those however rather than dropping to the ground would more than likely be sucked up in the vortex.
The steam is lighter than Earth Air even if not superheated. Martian air is about twice as heavy as Earth air of the same density, so that superheated steam should lift of bigtime, headed for the high sky. It will cool down rather quickly due to radiation, but it should still be quite light relative to the normal Martian atmosphere. Even when the vapor mixes with the Martian atmosphere high up and creates a relatively normal temperature high humidity mix, it should still be lighter than the surrounding Martian air, unless some portion should accumulate a condensate which would almost have to be ice particles or supercooled droplets. However if it is occurring in sunlight, I think it unlikely that the moisture would snow down. Most likely you would get a high atmospheric plume enriched in H20 vapors, which the U.V. would break down into Hydrogen, and Oxygen variations.
But I like that vision, the water spout rising from a solar heated tower.
Of course you would have to winterize the tower to some degree every night to prevent freeze damage.
It strikes me as rather good analysis of potential with very nice techniques. ![]()
It seems that the issue of the believed greenhouse effect feeds into this as well. Major nations on the Earth want to rotate out of Carbon fuels anyway and will be favoring alternative energy.
And then there is this:
http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research- … -fuel-your
Graphene breakthrough could make it possible to fuel your car with air
Graphene membranes could be used to 'sieve' hydrogen gas from the atmosphere to then generate electricity, say Nobel Prize-winning researchers.
By: Bryan Nelson
December 1, 2014, 10:38 p.m.Graphene
Graphene's structure is an atomic-scale honeycomb lattice made of carbon atoms. (Photo: Wiki Commons)The Nobel Prize winners for graphene research, Andre Geim of Manchester University and colleagues, have revealed a new application for the ultra-thin, ultra-strong material that could revolutionize fuel cell technology and open new doors for generating clean energy, reports Reuters.
Graphene, which was first isolated in 2004, is the thinnest material on Earth at just one atom thick, and is 200 times stronger than steel. It is impermeable to all gases and liquids, making it extremely useful, and its discovery paved the way for everything from corrosion-proof coating to super-thin condoms.
In their latest research, Geim and his team have also shown that this super-material could potentially be used for "sieving" hydrogen gas from the atmosphere, for the purpose of generating electricity. The finding could make hydrogen fuel cells more viable than ever before, and even make it possible to collect fuel right out of the air.
"We are very excited about this result because it opens a whole new area of promising applications for graphene in clean energy harvesting and hydrogen-based technologies," said Geim's co-researcher on the study, Marcelo Lozada-Hidalgo.
Though graphene is impermeable to even the smallest of atoms, Geim and his team found that protons, or hydrogen atoms stripped of their electrons, were nevertheless capable of passing through the material. This was especially the case when the graphene was heated and when graphene films were covered with platinum nanoparticles, which act as catalysts.
Basically, this means that graphene could potentially be used in proton-conducting membranes, which are essential components of fuel cell technology. Graphene would be a superior material for these components because it does not leak — a common problem with membranes made of other materials — which would greatly improve efficiency.
Perhaps even more remarkable, however, is that this latest breakthrough means graphene membranes could be used to extract hydrogen straight from the atmosphere. When combined with fuel cells, this technology could make it possible to make mobile electric generators powered just by the tiny amounts of hydrogen in the air.
"Essentially, you pump your fuel from the atmosphere and get electricity out of it," Geim said. "Our (study) provides proof that this kind of device is possible."
So more wealth to go to those who will participate in technological work for a living instead of trying to enslave other peoples with words and weapons.
Hurray for Autarky
In light of the recent conversation, I revive this information:
http://nextbigfuture.com/2015/01/graphe … llect.html
http://spectrum.ieee.org/nanoclast/gree … y-from-air
These article dated 2015 appears to support the notion that this idea is still considered fact supported by apparently notable people out there in science and news land.
https://fuelcellsworks.com/news/graphen … e-spectrum
http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research- … -fuel-your
If this turns out positive, then imagine a Mars, where coupled with the disintegration of water through U.V., a Hydrogen content is fostered as a dissolved minority gas, but is retrievable at will from the Martian atmosphere.
Graphene breakthrough could make it possible to fuel your car with air
Graphene membranes could be used to 'sieve' hydrogen gas from the atmosphere to then generate electricity, say Nobel Prize-winning researchers.
By: Bryan Nelson
December 1, 2014, 10:38 p.m.Graphene
Graphene's structure is an atomic-scale honeycomb lattice made of carbon atoms. (Photo: Wiki Commons)The Nobel Prize winners for graphene research, Andre Geim of Manchester University and colleagues, have revealed a new application for the ultra-thin, ultra-strong material that could revolutionize fuel cell technology and open new doors for generating clean energy, reports Reuters.
Graphene, which was first isolated in 2004, is the thinnest material on Earth at just one atom thick, and is 200 times stronger than steel. It is impermeable to all gases and liquids, making it extremely useful, and its discovery paved the way for everything from corrosion-proof coating to super-thin condoms.
In their latest research, Geim and his team have also shown that this super-material could potentially be used for "sieving" hydrogen gas from the atmosphere, for the purpose of generating electricity. The finding could make hydrogen fuel cells more viable than ever before, and even make it possible to collect fuel right out of the air.
"We are very excited about this result because it opens a whole new area of promising applications for graphene in clean energy harvesting and hydrogen-based technologies," said Geim's co-researcher on the study, Marcelo Lozada-Hidalgo.
Though graphene is impermeable to even the smallest of atoms, Geim and his team found that protons, or hydrogen atoms stripped of their electrons, were nevertheless capable of passing through the material. This was especially the case when the graphene was heated and when graphene films were covered with platinum nanoparticles, which act as catalysts.
Basically, this means that graphene could potentially be used in proton-conducting membranes, which are essential components of fuel cell technology. Graphene would be a superior material for these components because it does not leak — a common problem with membranes made of other materials — which would greatly improve efficiency.
Perhaps even more remarkable, however, is that this latest breakthrough means graphene membranes could be used to extract hydrogen straight from the atmosphere. When combined with fuel cells, this technology could make it possible to make mobile electric generators powered just by the tiny amounts of hydrogen in the air.
"Essentially, you pump your fuel from the atmosphere and get electricity out of it," Geim said. "Our (study) provides proof that this kind of device is possible."
This would make cities in Lava Tubes for instance and other underground methods of habitation much more habitable, since you would then not be required to work with solar arrays on the surface. And the output from fuel cells would include some water I think, so you could then have those contributions to life support at almost any location on Mars, without the costs of the normal methods of supply of life support.
Caves with artificial light with normal pressurization with agriculture. This would provide a minimization of the need for hard to procure materials such as transparent glazes, Copper/Aluminum which might otherwise be needed to have surface greenhouses or electrified underground greenhouses.
You could simply separate the Hydrogen out on the surface, and pipe it down, and likewise pipe down some atmosphere as the Oxidizer.
Piping could be of Steel or Plastic. (Maybe plastic needed for the Hydrogen due to embrittlement issues). (I am trainable GW).
So by adding water to the upper atmosphere of Mars, perhaps very conveniently turning it into a abiotic (I can use fancy words), solar cell.
One giant solar cell that is abiotic, but it's output can be input to a biotic system. (And provide electric power as well).
Now that's fantastic if possible. And at the same time you would be building up both the Oxygen percentage of the atmosphere, and the bulk of the atmosphere.
I think shooting ice into the upper atmosphere of Mars could be the most effect method to get good results. I could be wrong, but I think up there, above the maximum height where water normally cycles in the atmosphere, it must be incredibly dry. So ice of a proper size, moving at speed shot though that air and also subjected to daytime sunlight should sublimate very quickly. The trick will be to keep it from sublimating away during it's trip through the lower layers of atmosphere. (It shouldn't be that hard, to get some of it up higher, I am speculating).
Perhaps if you could generate an artificial dust devil you could "Funnel" water vapor to higher altitudes. Water vapor is certainly lighter than a CO2 dominated atmosphere, so it seems possible to me. Don't know if it would get high enough and stay high enough long enough to make it worthwhile though.
One giant Mars sized abiotic solar cell.
One interesting thing will be to find out if it does have an atmosphere. Certain circles think that red dwarf stars in their infancies will strip away the atmospheres of their terrestrial planets, since those planets if they are warm enough will likely be tidal locked, and will perhaps have weak magnetic fields.
Our Venus must have had a magnetic field when Mars lost its field and much of it's atmosphere? Otherwise, why would it still have an atmosphere like it does now? Or did it bake out a new one? Don't think so since it has lots of Nitrogen (As a total mass, relative to Earth). Lots to find out.
Another item of interest is how many;
Venus Analogs
Mars Analogs
Titan/Earth(Without O2) Analogs
Type of planet are typical?
I think to find a True-Earth, then you almost have to presume that photosynthesis must exist on such a planet, and the habitable zone, blah, blah, blah.
So, I don't expect to find any True-Earths near by, but apparently we can hope for;
Venus Analogs
Mars Analogs
Titan/Earth(Without O2) Analogs
If we think humans might eventually become interstellar, then perhaps the methods we choose to modify Venus, Mars, and Titan, should be chosen for the potential that they could be used to inhabit analog planets.
Of these the Venus Analogs will be the easiest to observe I presume, but a great potential will exist to find;
Titan/Earth(Without O2) Analogs
That is cold Earths, with N2 dominated atmospheres, and sound magnetic fields.
Perhaps the solar system where the Venus analog has been found will also have one of those. We are not able to very well detect those yet.
But to terraform such a world, arranging a nice impact of a significant object, to warm it up temporarily could be the prelude to occupation, and the use of super greenhouse gasses to establish a human civilization.
Lets say an Earth 2 AU out in our solar system. Imagine such a planet. (If Jupiter did not object).
Some cultures are showing interesting methods according to a relative. That person visited friends in Japan, and described a very advanced technological culture.
Of major interest to me was a simple thing. They have arrangements where building include shopping malls, and apartments. The apartments are upstairs, and the shopping and other facilities downstairs. Of course with a very compact nation with a super good train system, cars are not really that needed.
This in fact would be rather more like what I might expect on a future Mars. Obviously there are efficiencies.
A down side would be the danger of hate actions, such compact facilities being a tempting target for criminal sub cultures. Also such compact habitats have to have a better level of maintenance, or of course they could be susceptible to simple arson, or bad results from poor maintenance of equipment. However apparently Japan does not have a culture that is susceptible to those dangers. Staying away from the 'T' word here.
Spacenut said:
I think that you are correct about water vapor in the atmosphere freezing and ouch comes to mind if its anything like golf ball size when it comes back down.
Therefore the helmet

![]()
Just what do you want.
Kind of lonely around here just now Spacenut.
My communications on this thread have only been to indicate that we should not despair about the results of Marvin. (Could correct this to Mavin, but Spacenut might prefer that I leave my mistake
)
Notable to me is that Antius confirmed that while a part of the atmosphere of Mars was being swept away by the solar wind, there would have been a transition period where a great part of the Hydrosphere, and also large parts of a atmosphere would be solidified by increasing cold, as a condensate collection. This seems to support some other evidence that in fact the rift valley and the northern hemisphere are in part having massive amounts of ice under their apparent dirt floors. Antius also indicated that he thought that CO2 should have collected as an ice buried under water ice and dust and volcanic ash sediments. In fact their could be liquid CO2 at this point where CO2 Ice may have been warmed up. I also believe that if during that transition period, hypersaline lakes existed, there should be Nitrous Oxide as well, and Clathrates of it and CO2.
Some time ago, I remember suggesting shooting ice into the upper atmosphere of Mars, where it would vaporize due to drop in pressure, and lack of humidity. Doing it on the daytime side I presume would also add the heat of the sun to vaporize it.
This met with some horror from our good terraformer at the time, and he might have been correct for the Mars we supposed, but now if it is proved that their might be as much as say 1/2 mile of ice total to cover the whole planet, or much less, I think such objections might be allowed to pass.
We hate the "Loss" of atmosphere from a planet in this case, but, it is simply nature. In the end the mass is not lost, it is still in the Universe, Galaxy, Solar system.
So, give up some Hydrogen, and maybe a little Oxygen.
Of course what I am hoping to do is to tap into the usually hated U.V. flux. It should be hideous at high altitudes on Mars, and it should rapidly split the water vapor that ends up in the upper atmosphere. So now you have turned it into your power source.
Due to low atmospheric pressure and low gravity .38 g, as Antius has stated ballistic trajectories are more favored than on Earth. So make your ice cannons and shoot ice slugs up in such a manner that the ice slugs will rapidly rise above the lower atmosphere where temperatures and pressure can allow the vapor to condense, up where especially in the sunlight, the ice will rapidly vaporize. Just on a guess. Lets think about a pressure of .01 or .1 mb, in full sunlight. It almost has to become vapor, and the U.V. will be very hostile to it and will tend to shred it into Hydrogen and Oxygen. The Hydrogen will preferentially float away and preferentially be stripped away by the solar wind, tending to leave behind more Oxygen, and tending to build up the Oxygen content.
In order to do this we will have to have melted reservoirs of water, perhaps in a manner suggested by GW or myself. Various options are available. Mr. GW's ideas are very rugged, and may often be preferred.
Reservoirs of water have shelter and other advantages to offer.
Anyway, I have thought of yet a new wrinkle on this that I had not previously entertained.
While much of the Hydrogen will quickly be lost, perhaps a small amount of Hydrogen will filter down to the lower layers of the atmosphere as a dissolved gas. If so, I can see the opportunity to use reverse osmosis to get it out of the atmosphere it could be a minor component just as CO is. However being much smaller than CO2, CO, O2, and N2, it should respond to reverse Osmosis much better.
Now if you have got that, you can inject the hydrogen into your liquid water reservoirs, and microbes will extract Oxygen from Oxygen containing Sulfur compounds, if that is a trick you like.
But should you prefer, perhaps you might also add Martian atmosphere to the water, the CO2 might supply Oxygen for micro-organisms to life off of. Of course the atmosphere also contains small amounts of O2 and CO which would be a bit of a contribution as well.
Further, if indeed, you might harvest Hydrogen from the atmosphere by the previously mentioned methods, then of course I would think you can have fuel cells that run off of H2 and CO2, and also maybe even internal combustion engines.
So, the point being that this could be a method to turn a very bad enemy of life on Mars, U.V. into a helper.
Further thoughts:
1) By pushing water vapor into the upper atmosphere, it is possible that you could scrub Chlorine out of the atmosphere. Chlorine wrecks Ozone.
2) It is possible that you might put an intensified O2 layer above the normal atmosphere of Mars, and that could develop some Ozone, even if the lower atmosphere was still dominantly CO2. However, I would think it would not be very strong, but something is better than nothing.
3) If #2 were true, and you did get an Ozone layer, then you will have to fling your ice bullets above the Ozone to keep the process going.
Anyway perhaps a aboitic pathway to a Martian biology, and a usfull assist to the habitation of Mars by humans.
Null & Void
I hope this will be fun.
P.S.
Just throwing this in also. I was looking for Sulfur compounds on Mars, and found this. The video is long, but interesting, involves brine on Mars, and NASA.
I like to see you guys going at it. It is sort cliché thing to mention, but very real, Phobos & Demos. What does the shell world guy think about that and solar power.
They may be embedded with ice or not, but some materials there. Going to all the effort to cook up an atmosphere for Mars, I would think that Phobos and Demos would just be easy.
And maybe get some shell worlds, and maybe point a terraformer death star at the northern hemisphere ocean.
Personally I would go for the south pole ice cap, since a river ending in Hellas would offer the chance of a sea with the most maximized air pressure early on.
So, I read your various references, and am impressed.
Transmutation would be particularly valuable in space activities, if you had lots of Nickel, it would seem, to make your Copper.
And Autarky in spite of it's shady past, does in fact also by itself have deep value for human groups who are remote from the main historical center, Earth.
So, all good.
This does suggest a tidal wave level of change going forward in time. In most cases potentially good, at least for North America and Europe. Our Air Craft carriers may be almost or completely out of date, but in the near future, it likely does not matter, since we will have far less vital interests overseas.
It's good for an old guy like me to get such and update, since, I am rather out of touch.
That's very hopeful, when you see that humble rocks might be upgraded to a much greater value to humans.
Ya, I was reluctant to dip into this one. It requires the work of the truly gifted. Lets hope they will be involved.
That's a good alternate perspective I think, upon reflection. Thanks.
Humans are rather binary in behaviors through times or perhaps more properly cyclic. Globalization, could be like a party that has gone on a bit too long. You might just want to go home and have a good nights sleep.
Transmutation. I had a bit of trouble not thinking that was fantastic, but we do make Helium if we perform fusion don't we. It's a start in that direction. I guess I am just slow to learn.
I have been watching the Oil Price War, and note here several things I have read. Add some comments as well I hope.
Of course the tie in to space, would be an increased or decreased flow of money to nations who exhibit space flight capability.
Historically, this first started by the price of Oil going high, and making unconventional energy sources worth going after.
One of those unconventional technologies is fracking in North America.
With Solar and Wind coming along, it becomes obvious that under the previous high pricing, the days of Carbon fuels were numbered as an almost exclusive energy source. Whereas, previously owning the raw materials was the dominant position, now owning the markets is the dominant position. We are too strong to colonize, so, the producers have to live with that.
Who can really know what has been going through the minds of major oil producers, but guesses, indicate that they new that the Oil they owned was at risk of being devalued.
So, they decided to try to run alternative energy and high cost oil producers out of business to groom the future market to their needs.
So, we appear to have some groups of note in this game.
1) USA/Tight Oil
2) Gulf nations/Cheap Oil
3) Poor Oil Nations/Venezuela, Nigeria, etc.
4) Russia and company/Cannot stop their oil wells or they will freeze
5) True alternative energy and high cost oil productions
It looks like the #2 will put #5 back pretty hard, and #3 will more than likely have to live with much less.
It looks like at the worst all that #2 can do to #1, and has already done to a degree is to create an internal strategic oil reserve for the USA.
-Oil that is not worth pumping now, is just capped off and waits for a demand, and a price rise. In fact they are drilling wells and just capping them off now ![]()
As for #4, they appear to be in an oil market war with #2, for the China/Asia market, and they seem to be winning ground in that war.
Some of the #1 activity, "Tight Oil" is still competitive, due to North American innovations.
So, as an article I just read seemed to say, "Opec has just earned themselves a permanent pay cut".
So, as for the economic implications which might relate to Space.
Everybody presumably gets cheaper oil, and can manufacture goods cheaper. Of course this risks setting off global deflation since also shipping costs go down, and so they can compete with each other in the same markets.
That's a curious thing deflation/depression. "We have too many able bodied people who could fix things, so let's be poor" ![]()
Anyway from our standpoint, hardware for space should become cheaper, and although a small cost, fuel cheaper. Spacefaring nations should have more cash left over after fuel costs.
While Russia will suffer from lower Oil costs, it's economy is less dependent on Oil than others, just like the USA is a major producer, but is less dependent on oil than say Opec members. Russia will also be able to benefit by buying cheaper goods from China/Etc and Europe/Etc.
Well, even though it can be perceived in the news that the world may have some general tendency towards bad economics, the point is relative economics going forward seem to favor nations in general that happen to have some space faring capabilities, or at least are more technological in character.
Of course some not producer 3rd world nations also benefit from low fuel costs as well.
Allright Mr. Spacenut:
Query phrase "SpaceX + Satellite"
Informative, but somewhat on the negitive side.
http://www.wired.com/2015/06/elon-musk- … -internet/
SpaceX moves:
http://qz.com/426158/the-details-behind … xperiment/
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/ho … 16-n370196
Even Elon Musk is tentative about this:
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/elon-m … end-spacex
Query phrase "Parts from asteroids for satelite repair"
Orbiting 'Rest Stops' to Repair Crumbling Satellites?
http://news.discovery.com/space/orbitin … 150618.htm
Query phrase "Asteroid Mining + Manufactured Parts"
http://www.wired.com/2013/01/deep-space … id-mining/
I fully understand that much of the above can disappear into vapors, but in general it points in a direction which could be like a place to put to root a growing outerspace industrial process capable of connecting cash finances on the surface of Earth to places beyond the atmosphere. And that if it were to exist, might perhaps then be joined to multiple non-Earth profit structures.
During my searches, I observed references to the use of Drones and Balloons, which are potentially additional competitive technologies, I also think I observed reference to SpaceX considering Laser communications. Laser because the bandwidth needed for regular transmissions is limited, and perhaps already owned.
Interesting then I can see that perhaps if you did have a ring of SpaceX/Other satellites in orbit, perhaps a Drone Airship method.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4owUqfduT2c
The first video is of course on the topic, but if you let the next one play as well it is quite interesting. More than quite interesting!
These would not necessarily be competitive, but symbiotic, as you could reduce the number of Satellites, to reduce cost, and could fly drone airships above the normal cloud layers, to allow them to receive and send laser transmissions from the satellite ring. I would presume that then the airships would use bandwidth to retransmit to ground.
Airships being that high up, perhaps they could then "See" more of the satellites.
And of course we could expect our evil enemies then to say why not just the drones? Well, the reason being that with a ring of satellites, laser communications could work all the way to the ground, if the weather permitted. As for the drone airships, you would only have them over populated areas such as cities.
Where are all you minions Spacenut?
Anyway for such a topic, I did not think I might have much to add. But it is an interesting topic.
So, various entities propose to:
Manufacture parts from Asteroid materials, perhaps for satellites.
Obtain Fuel from Asteroids for satellites perhaps.
Place a ring of internet satellites in low Earth Orbit. Low enough were eventually perhaps even humans might be involved in some of the servicing.
And of course I feel the Moon should have a review, as it could in fact supply materials, both for parts and propulsion.
It is possible that a cash coupling to outerspace could be engineered. It is not beyond hope.
SOLAR SINTER:
http://techcrunch.com/2014/09/25/3d-pri … f-the-sun/
“So what are you doing this weekend, Markus?”
“Oh, you know. Heading out to the desert and harnessing the power of the sun to make a 3D printer that can print objects out of sand. You?”
“… catching up on Breaking Bad.”
You know the kid in your old neighborhood that spent his spare time frying ants with a magnifying glass? This is like that — except instead of a magnifying glass, he’s using an big ol’ fresnel lens. And instead of roasting insects, he’s melting freaking sand into stuff.
Built by artist Markus Kayser, the “SolarSinter” concept isn’t too disimmilar from laser sintering printers used by operations like SpaceX to print otherwise impossible objects out of metal. A focused sun beam is a whole lot less precise than a finely-honed laser, of course — but the core concepts are the same.
I bet this guy could make a mean sand castle.
So, I think it is cool. Of course on Mars, the sand would be dominantly basalt, so a bit different.
However I have to ask the question "What if I were to spray a stream of CO or H2 on to the melt spot? It should pluck Oxygen and perhaps some other molecules from the melt, and I guess what you did with the result would be up to you. But you would have an object that is more reduced of O2, and you would have a source of O2.
Perhaps if harvest of metals would be possible you would do that as well. That could be done magnetically, or in the melt, I think possibly with electrolysis?
Way on in the future on Mars, solar dune eating machines!
I proposed a slow inflation of the Mars atmosphere, where we might hope to convert it to O2, so as to maintain an Ozone layer early on.
For me this makes more sense than a fast inflation of a atmosphere which would potentially reduce the need for pressure suits, but would involve maintaining a CO2 dominated atmosphere.
My concerns were the melting of permafrost under the fast inflation model, and Antius brought up the dust storm problem, and also if I recall correctly indicated that their would be a wind load problem from a thicker atmosphere, due to the day/night extremes of temperature, even at say 250 to 300 mb of atmosphere.
I choose to list some further thoughts on this.
First of all a potential problem with the slow inflation O2 dominated model. As in the biosphere experiments, it may prove true that O2 will react with the surface materials of Mars. This could be detrimental, or beneficial.
Detrimental: You loose your Oxygen to from the atmosphere, and it gets locked up in the soil.
Beneficial: It is possible, that if indeed a great deal of the dust has come from off of Mars, perhaps at greater depths, a great deal of Carbonaceous material has been deposited.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonaceous_chondrite
This will of course tend to absorb Oxygen, but it might also release Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and H20 to the atmosphere over time. So, perhaps by this method more atmospheric materials made available which would not become available if you simply did a quick inflation on CO2.
It might be interesting in fact to verify if such materials are significantly present how much Methane might be generated by warming the surface, and providing Oxygen to potential organisms which might feed off of the Carbonaceous. This is important because it might skew your warming schedule, but it might also reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses which would be required to be generated mechanically by humans and their machines.
Under the slow inflation model of O2, the dust hazard would mount up more slowly of course. So, due to the time delay, the costs can be delayed, and perhaps using special tricks reduced substantially.
One method is to feed off of the dust/sand dunes. Design robotic automation which will eat them and manufacture useful materials. Extract metals, if any, glass, if possible, and make bricks/tiles and so on. This I presume would be powered by the sun.
Another method should an Ozone layer actually be accomplished, might be to use vascular plants to hold the dunes down. I would expect this to be most possible at the poles, where more moisture might be available seasonally (Summer), and where the midnight sun would provide a minimum of say 60 frost free days each year. We would be talking about dunes covered in tundra/or steppes or some analog of them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steppe
If you could somehow engineer trees which might survive the hideous winters, then maybe Taiga.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiga
Under the slow inflation O2 method, you might contemplate forced melting of the southern ice cap to produce rivers early on. Ice covered rivers would flow even maybe under 22 mb of pressure, or perhaps even less. Allowing that water to flow down to basins such as Hellas, you might harness the hydro-electric power, and fill a small sea.
Terraformer has been contemplating a ecosystem which might generate it's own suntan lotion, so perhaps this could be done even if you don't have a good Ozone layer. But anyway presuming a pressure of 22 mb at the lowest points of the the south ice body, I would suppose maybe 44 mb at the the bottom of Hellas at that time. Perhaps possible if salt added to have patches of open water which would catch dust. And of course such a sea would become a resource, and perhaps a significant help in converting more CO2 to O2 and Hydrocarbon materials.
As for wind loads, above ground building would simply have to be made to cope with it as the pressure moved higher.
I have also tried to imagine a hybrid situation where a pool of CO2 atmosphere was below a upper atmosphere of O2, so as to be able to have an Ozone layer, and also use more CO2 to inflate the atmosphere, but I am betting that atmospheric mixing will be too intense for such a stratification to be possible.
Hi Spatula, nice to think another planet could inspire the minds of space enthusiasts. Also, I am making sure your post (Which is before this one), does not go unnoticed.
Yes, Louis, the regolith as well. Specifically the dunes perhaps.
Design solar powered robots that will eat the dunes, extract special materials such as metals if that is possible, create reduced materials such as metal parts, and ceramic blocks, ect, and expel Oxygen and perhaps other gasses.
Some of those parts, metal and ceramic, being used to build still other of the dune eating robots.
Nice, not quite https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Neumann_machine
But I would think that perhaps humans and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telepresence
could be used to assemble those new machines. As the dunes got eaten, more atmosphere, more machines, more humans.
Why not?
Parts manufactured for the new machines, or repairs of such machines, and then might include parts to make stone towers, for future purposes such as wind towers. If the planet is going to be windy later, might as well take advantage of it. And of course parts for buildings and other machines, if that much materials are available.
I would presume if manufactured correctly it would take a long time for ceramic parts to become Oxidized again.
Louis wrote:
Gas is surely just a form of matter. The reality is there are many, many trillions of tonnes of matter in the regolith of Mars which can be converted into gas - just think of all the iron oxide, with oxygen bound in it. Talking about gas as gas on Mars is irrelevant. All you need to convert the solid matter into gas is energy - and that can come either through nuclear power or solar satellites.Antius wrote:
SpaceNut wrote:
Is there a way to calculate how much gavity would need to change by in order to stop the lose rate due to the solar winds and then from that amount of gravity change we could then solve for the amount of mass to make that happen. If that mass is centered around the equator to concentrate the effect.
Lack of gravity isn't the problem. The catastrophic loss started when the planet lost its magnetic field. The (then) more extensive atmosphere was scoured by solar winds from the nascent sun. The present loss rate appears to be quite modest in comparison, but the damage is done.
This isn't to say that no terraforming could take place. There would appear to be substantial gas remaining. But we need to temper our expectations. A strictly Earth analogue environment is probably not achievable given the extent of past volatile losses. Transporting mass or volatiles from other solar system bodies would be a very expensive long term project and more than a little risky. In my opinion it just doesn't work economically. But who knows? In a thousand years immortal beings of infinite wealth might decide to make that very long term investment.
Lack of gravity isn't the problem. The catastrophic loss started when the planet lost its magnetic field. The (then) more extensive atmosphere was scoured by solar winds from the nascent sun. The present loss rate appears to be quite modest in comparison, but the damage is done.
This isn't to say that no terraforming could take place. There would appear to be substantial gas remaining. But we need to temper our expectations. A strictly Earth analogue environment is probably not achievable given the extent of past volatile losses. Transporting mass or volatiles from other solar system bodies would be a very expensive long term project and more than a little risky. In my opinion it just doesn't work economically. But who knows? In a thousand years immortal beings of infinite wealth might decide to make that very long term investment.
In the past I have read that under the current conditions of Mars, such goop should be being created. However it's lack is perhaps due to an oxidation effect in the soil?
Anyway in reading greenhouse plans, primarily from RobertDyck, I have seen that there are types of "Plastic" greenhouse materials which endure U.V. rather well, but also do not block it.
I am thinking that the creation of Abiotic hydrocarbons inside of those might be possible. If you inflated them with CO2, and kept the Relative Humidity high, perhaps it would create useful materials. And, since we would not be intending to sustain the life of organisms with artificial pressurization, the pressures could be kept rather low, reducing the tensile loads on such "Balloons".
Perhaps catalyst methods could be involved as well to promote the objective.
I will also add this on the positive side:
http://news.sciencemag.org/physics/2015 … eakthrough
It is close to what I am thinking of. They propose to fortify the magnetic fields of their fusion reactors by running currents through the plasma it self.
So, I think the upper atmosphere of Mars being bombarded by the solar wind may have plasma like qualities, so could you run electric currents through that? Probably not from the ground, but perhaps from orbit.
Well, how do you power that? Solar panels, nuclear reactors, or Solar wind electric generation?
For solar wind electric generation, the problem is if you generate power from the solar wind, and yet you keep it away with the field, how can those two objectives be compatible? I a not saying it is impossible, but I would say that I am reaching beyond my abilities to even speculate on it at this time. However, my preference would be to harness the solar wind in order to deflect it.
I feel that it has to be remembered that the western notion of how to exist usually is a bit light on methods harmonization. China is centered on that concept I believe.
Humans, and really all life forms, are more like a sea lamprey when you drill down deep.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sea_lamprey
There, that's what we really look like in the mirror.
Even Cyanobacteria/Algae, intercept the path of hapless photons, and chemicals, and feed off of them. And it all appears to be driven by entropy.
As in some true eastern (Not Middle Eastern) thinking, we are like a whirl pool.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whirlpool
![]()
So, being truthful to ourselves we admit that we do feed off of the universe, like a baby on a parent:) Ha ha found a way to say it without the creepy police getting on the issue. It's the nicer view, we are children and the universe our parents, or perhaps we are just parasites.
Whatever you feel works for you.
So, if we propose to do anything the first thing to admit is that we feed off of entropy.
So, we have a choice in manipulations. We can manipulate in ways that do not harmonize with entropy and pay a greater cost, or we can admit that we are not generative, but rather a path for entropy, and so do our manipulations in greater harmony or cost effective harmony with entropy so as to earn a living, amplifying our investment from the forces of the universe.
At this time I consider an artificial enhancement of a magnetic field worth conversation, but likely to be non-harmonious with our abilities to extract wealth from the universe.
The Mars I now see, may be within the grasping capabilities of humans to harness it's potential entropy pathways, and that seems likely to be a profitable proposition, which is necessary if we would want to foster the continuation of our pattern types through at least the four dimensions commonly perceived by us.
Study of magnetics on Mars will be wise, but it will have to be some very unlikely trick of fate that we might find that we can simply flick a light switch and turn its magnetic field back on, and generation of an artificial one would be a horrendous cost.
I can see that exploring the manipulation of Magnetism is not a waste of time, and I sense that you were fishing for a better catch than me, but I will offer these links, in the hope that they might point a way.
http://www.fhshh.com/space-the-magnetic … ought.html
http://www.popularmechanics.com/space/d … rmia-life/
Scientists had long believed that asteroids and meteoroids could have emanated only brief magnetic fields that lasted just a few thousand years after their creation—when the asteroid's molten core is still sloshing around. But Bryson found that the space rocks had magnetic fields that lasted much, much longer. These longer-lasting magnetic fields had to have been created by an entirely different force, the team decided.
Bryson thinks it works like this: "When the temperature of the core lowers enough, it starts to solidify. Most of the stuff that makes up this core is metal (mostly iron and nickel,) but there are also a couple of really light elements mixed in. As the metal slowly solidifies around these light elements, the light elements transform into liquid, and push outwards from the core. And it's the convection that results from that liquid moving upward that creates the magnetic field."
Here, I have at least tried to contribute in a way that supports the idea of creating a magnetic field. However, I am going back to:
Index
» Terraformation
» The end of the line for Mars Terraforming?
and there I will make arguments about why a induced magnetic field is in my opinion probably a luxury which will be hard to afford until much later, and will do little to enhance the survival of humans for the first decades of settlement on Mars at least.