You are not logged in.
My dream situation would be to have a lava tube and a sizable sand dune.
I would fill the opening of the lava tube with soil, and therefore define an isolatable chamber to do things with.
As for a city, it would either be in the lava tube or outside of it (But connected).
I would go back to Zubrin thinking with the Roman Arches. For bricks, perhaps clay may be centrifuged from dune materials (Per Spacenut). Else apparently NASA is researching methods of biologically making bricks using soil and human Urine.
So Bricks possible, and Mortar also (The Biological Mortar).
I would back fill over those structures with dune tailings (What's left over after having extracted what you can from the dune materials, Clays, Metals, Silica Ect.)
For airlocks I guess they would connect somehow to the top of a Roman arch. Perhaps those airlocks could double as viewing ports so people could see outside.
I hope to think about using the habitat itself as a heat sink. While individuals will need temperature control in their small private/sleeping quarters, for most of the habitat, allowing temperature swings might be OK. With this I am trying to accommodate conversations recently where individuals have offered hopes that the heat and cold of the Martian day and night could produce energy. I suggest that solar collectors / Radiators could interact with say 90% of the habitat environment to do that. This could justify making more living space, as it would not only be for living but for energy production.
As for scale, I think this could be scaled from small to large, up to a "City".
I think the purpose of this facility could be to host a research center, where samples extracted from around the planet could be studied.
This I think is offspring of my conversations and observations dealing with Louis ideas. A method to get research money from Earth.
Of Course there will need to be construction and maintenance staff, which will provide jobs for some relatively permanent residents.
As for Greenhouses, I guess I will go for what can be done. Artificial lights, and/or greenhouses.
As for the dream situation, probably not available (Lava Tube + Sand Dune). If not then I guess the city made of dunes. However if large ore body of iron ore available per Louis, so much the better.
So far what I see is that the Moon keeps being upgraded. Although it is not equivalent to Mars, it is being discovered that it is more like Mars than the story we were told.
One thing I don't like about this site is that an idea that might be an alternative is almost always murdered in the nursery if possible, by those who have a pet notion of how things should go.
Personally I think that the primary objective of the American space program was to keep the human race from prospering in space. I do not think that that is the intention of the people who work at NASA, at least not most of them, but I do believe that social engineers showed ups just in time to sabotage the plans. Further they kept us away from an achievable objective, and also pointed us to one which was very hard, and then they made sure that not enough resources would exist to implement it.
However, the west is still full of inventors and doers. It looks like it may be possible that humans will make it to Mars anyway. On the other hand the cosmic criminals may go to deeper measures to sabotage that effort.
Therefore, it is wise to calculate options, such as Mars if it can happen, and alternately the Moon, Ceres, and Venus. For Venus and Ceres, the Moon will be of great value. Possibly for Mars it may have value. We should keep all options on the table, to make the enemies task harder.
You are at war with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blank_Slate
The Soviet Union did what it did, thinking that they could simply gather the whole population into it's training facilities, and teach them to be good. Then paradise would occur. It did not.
They are not the only ones. Just remember that the blank slate people want to retain you for their notion of a perfect world, and they most definitely do not want a branch of the human race to escape from their powers. I picked on the Soviet Union, as an example, but their are many other of this type out there, but it would not be P.C. to go into those details.
Options, keep your options open, and don't forget to slap their faces and take their Cigars.
No offence was intended Tom.
Back the topic, this seems to support the notion of extracting minerals by the methods I previously indicated.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2011/0219769.html
Abstract:
Geothermal brine always contains some carbon dioxide in solution. Separating steam from geothermal brine removes the carbon dioxide, sharply increasing the pH of the brine and causing precipitation of pH sensitive minerals, including calcium carbonate, magnesium silicate and other metal silicates, clays, and metal sulfides. The binary heat exchanger in a steam-binary hybrid geothermal power plant is especially sensitive to scale deposition from flashed geothermal brine, and application of expensive scale inhibitors is required.
Deposition of scale in the binary heat exchanger can be controlled by separating a small amount of gas-rich vapor from the brine before the main stage of steam separation, and combining this gas rich vapor with the flashed brine before in enters the binary heat exchanger. The carbon dioxide thus added to the brine will decrease pH, decreasing or completely blocking precipitation and deposition of pH sensitive minerals as scale.
So, the objective of avoiding scale, and also extracting minerals are in opposition to each other for the design contemplated above. I am not sure that that has to be a show stopper though.
Could you first extract the minerals from the solution using Electrowinning, and then use the anti-scaling method?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrowinning
The point is that when you would drill for geothermal energy/storage, you would also target minerals far below, and be able to bring them up. Perhaps with the use of bioleaching.
Yes, I am fumbling around, but the notions are there.
On the other hand, perhaps it is possible to "Boil" a mix of CO2 and H20 steam out of the solution, by drawing a vacuum using liquid air to condense those vapors into a fluid. That fluid should be rather mineral free. The tank where the steam flashed from would of course be in danger of mineral precipitations, but it would not be a metal heat exchanger, so it might endure it fairly well. A concentrate of minerals would develop, and perhaps such concentrating will aid Electrowinning. As for the undesired precipitants, perhaps that would fall like a snow in the tank. It might be possible to remove it as a tailings. As for coating the inside of the tank, perhaps reasonable methods would allow the scale to fall off from an applied mechanical force. Maybe even sound waves flexing the tank walls.
Obviously I am not high tech here. Just grasping at possibilities/straws.
So, your turbine would not directly involve the brine/CO2 mix, but would perhaps turn a Liquid air turbine instead. The liquid air being boiled by thermal transfer through a heat exchanger where the condensing CO2 and H20 mix adds heat in a phase change from vapor to liquid, and where on the other side of the heat exchanger, liquid air is boiled.
Just thought I would revive this topic a bit:
http://www.nasa.gov/feature/jpl/lowdown … sest-orbit![]()
It is hard for me to visualize how ice would be under this dirt, but I believe it is, it is just that I don't understand why it does not flow upwards more through the dirt.
And then this:
Ceres' mysterious bright spots are giant salt pans, Dawn mission data shows
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-12-10/c … ta/7014134
And I have added this:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 … 105955.htm
The experiments, performed using the Vertical Gun Range at NASA's Ames Research Center, suggest that when asteroids and other impactors hit Ceres, much of the impact material remains on the surface instead of bouncing off into space. The findings suggest the surface of Ceres could consist largely of a mish-mash of meteoritic material collected over billions of years of bombardment.
All of this, and then there is the possibility that Ceres is full of Ammonia down deep, that is, if it was formed in the outer solar system. (Some item of speculation lately).
For me this indicates that Ceres should be upgraded as a target, of intentions.
Just perhaps it could donate Nitrogen to Mars some day, and still without that notion;
I see that the object perhaps contains a broad distribution of chemicals desired, on it's surface.
It may have just enough gravity to allow for relatively normalized material acquisitions (Unlike small rubble pile asteroids),
Yet it has a small gravity.
It has Magnesium available for rockets (Although lots of things will do for such a weak gravity well).
I don't intend to go into terraforming here (Wrong section), but will mention that I am thinking reverse dyson sphere.
Not a pressurized shell, but rather a very large amount of orbiting discrete objects, so that many times the disc of Ceres can be recovered for solar energy, and so that the solar wind is blocked (And harnessed), and of course radiation shielding, and then in each discrete orbiting object the potential for a synthetic gravity machine.
Along with booster recovery just demonstrated recently and perhaps the notion of some nuclear (Fission/Fusion) propulsion, I really wonder if Ceres could be a good bet for cultivating a child culture for human kind/type.
OK, Tom, maybe.
By that time, any chunk of ice or hydrocarbons that contained hydrogen, would be a source of energy.
So, I asked for relative costs. Don't see that you bothered.
Otherwise, yes, of course, if fusion is cheep, then why do we bother to build power plants? Why not wait for fusion?
It's unknown. Prove it.
By the way, Mars provides a much colder night and a much colder winter. And with the thin atmosphere presumed (Not now, but at 250 mb), the wind speeds would be quite high, which assumption I base on what Antius, has said, however I do with happiness give him freely all powers to disavow me.
And on another line, very happy to tell, you that I fully intend this topic to be about possible activity on Earth which I consider worth promoting, and adaptation to Mars is secondary. Your cautions have some merit, but the evidence offered is insubstantial.
Oh, well I don't necessarily agree.
That big yellow ball called the sun, that's a fusion reactor. Been running for perhaps 4.5 billion years. Burns real Hydrogen. Your interfaces? Sunlight>Temperature differences > wind. So there.
Can you say Thorium? Can you say fusion reactor (On Mars)? Nice.
Still, there is that energy in the wind. Alright, it will be a cost/benefit based decision.
Thing is, most likely best terraform of Mars has perhaps 250 mb of mostly O2. Nights still very cold, days somewhat warmer than now.
I guess you would have a choice, perhaps you would want the high winds, or perhaps you would add a super greenhouse gas, and the nights would not get that cold, the days even warmer.
Still, if a windmill were made to dissipate heat through it's blades, to the universe, then it could be quite a source of cold, and in one use, liquid atmosphere.
In a case where you also used Hydricity, and also geothermal (For energy, thermal storage, and mining), that cold would be quite useful.
I am not going to give you a free pass on this. Prove to me that fusion power plants on the surface of Mars, or Thorium reactors will be more cost effective for the benefits received than the triad I suggest (Wind-liquid air, Hydricity, Geothermal-Heat-thermal storage-Mining).
The ball is in your court ![]()
Continuation....
So the Rickshaw relates to the Segway scooter, relates to a balance beam, relates to a space suit.
Let's make sure that mushroom head did not live in vain. Myself, I spent quite a lot of time working on balances. That could be a reason for humility, but it also teaches you in a way that language never could what the reality of gravitation and inertia will tell you. In addition to that it my training involved electronics, and mechanics, and precision, and accuracy. While to many this is a reason to be quiet and be humble (A good practice anyway), it seems it can give you inner eyes perhaps for what matters, and what works. Reality is a bitch. You have to play by it's rules in the end, but you should never stop looking for sub clauses that give you permissions to live and prosper.
For instance why did I choose electroplating as a career possibility in the 9th grade (To the amusement of all my very assured classmates)?
Well life has lots of jokes, it would seem that electroplating is related to electrowinning, which might be quite useful for a culture that exists on the reality of tangible materials and not the arrogant words of the overly communicative.
There are other experiences I am waiting for an answer for. Why in the world was I made to do this thing? Well I am guessing eventually I will know.
![]()
http://www.touregypt.net/godsofegypt/maat2.htm
http://www.egyptian-scarabs.co.uk/weigh … _heart.htm
I think I am in the mood to get rid of something, I have been carrying for some time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rickshaw![]()
I guess if you had that job you had to wear a Mushroom hat, and be a draft horse.
Lets suggest a lighter weight long duration suit instead.
Instead of the lady, have life support consumables.
Of course Mushroomhead has to put on a spacesuit of some kind.
Where the wheel pivots are create a balance beam situation.
Where the hands are, make a pivot connected to the hips of the spacesuit.
Now you can navigate the surface for days, weeks, or perhaps even months. But your suit needs to allow you to deal with body functions, and that limits your mobility, but since you have a pivot at the hips and your rickshaw is a balance beam, your whole body capsule suit can rotate, and the balance beam wheels can swivel you to present your arms and face to many things. You may also have solar cell arrays on your rickshaw. And the Rickshaw can let you walk perhaps, if it is not a total capsule type, in which case it can impose extra weight on your body frame to make you fit.
Just some ideas. I think space blankets to cover you up during the night will be a good idea as well. In the night time if the rickshaw has enough power, it can take you to your next work site while you sleep, balancing on it's two wheels. (Need gyro's for that though, I think).
There you go.
And a combination of two legs/feet and two wheels might not be that bad a method for a rover either. Balance becomes easier, and stuck in a sand dune has options perhaps.
And by the way a rickshaw might be a very nice therapudic method for people who don't have enough strength in their legs to stand up and balance.
No problems with your answer Robert, sometimes, it will just have to be really real. But as you can see from my previous post, to a degree other options are available, but so far there is nothing as easy as just doing things the way we can on Earth in most places.
Outside on Mars is always going to require extra work as far as I can see.
SpaceNut wrote:
Another shifting topic issue fixed along with the other artifacts....
I wonder what astronauts do in their spacesuits when they sneeze, get a speck of dust in their eyes, or need to scratch their nose? I couldn't imagine living in a spacesuit.
Yes, and if you have an Counterpressure suit, and you pee yourself repeatedly, I suppose that works, but it is distasteful. I have yet to figure out how things work if your have diarrhea in a Counterpressure suit. It's gonna happen. It seems to me that having cleaning up such a mess is something worth trying to avoid.
Balloon suits let you pee yourself, and poo too, but then you have to clean that up.
Can't help it, sometimes you will be using those suits, and having to do some cleaning, and being rather unhappy. Humility required to live on Mars. (Or the Earth actually, if you want to continue to live.)
So, as far as I can see, the first issue is to reduce the amount of suit time you have to have outside. Use telepresence as much as is practical.
Then, I recommend that in addition to counterpressure suits, and balloon suits, and their combinations, you develop long duration cyborg suits with the capability for the human to partially disengage from the suit to perform bodily functions in a less disgraceful manner.
Such suits by their nature will not allow you to do "Quick and Generalized" work, but will have to be designed to fulfill a choreographed service, and to do it efficiently and repetitively. I generally try to avoid efficiency and hope to incorporate general capabilities instead, but at the end of the day you have to make a profit, or submit to the authority of others, and those others could include failure to survive.
So, I suggest as an example a suit with 3 arms, where the human is positioned in an enclosure with at least 3 wheels, perhaps 4 or 6, where they lie down on the floor, and have a view window below. The reason for 3 arms, is they will have 2 arms deployed, and the 3rd will be an option which was not chosen to be used at that time.
The purpose of such a suit would be to work on flat ground. Perhaps as a prospector, inspector, or electrician, or plumber, etc.
Mode 1 will have you poke both of your real arms though holes in the enclosure to manipulate objects below on the ground.
Mode 2 will have you poke one of your real arms through a hole in the enclosure to manipulate objects below on the ground.
But, with your spare hand, you will be able to clean distasteful body functions, clean said hand with clever methods which will have to be invented, and then eat something or drink something, in that order at all times we hope.
While your spare hand is not doing body functions, it may operate a joy stick and keyboard, to operate a cybernetic hand which is to assist the one real hand you have poked out of the enclosure.
A very ambidextrous and well trained person might be able to accomplish this, do good effective work and maintain hygiene, but we might want more. If we presume that the hands poked out of the enclosure are in "Balloon Arm and Glove" suits, can they extract them and what is the dexterity of such gloved hands?
Still, if they could pull their arm/hands out of the suit arm/glove, they could take a break, eliminate body wastes, clean up, eat/drink something, and go back to work fairly easily. Their cybernetic suit would include capsule space for that. The suit would be suitable for extended stays on the surface. A week? A Month?
If this were accomplished this still leaves problems.
1) The Arms/Hands are not that dexterous.
2) The cyborg suit only presents the human to a ground presentation. (Their facing the dirt at all times).
For #1, I suggest a triple join arm, where a protective balloon arm is attached to the capsule bell the human stays in. However then human when extending their arm into that balloon, may have put on a counterpressure arm/glove. Upon the insertion, a "Cork" (For lack of a better description), seats and therefore isolates the pressurized balloon arm from the capsule.
The arm/hand balloon may then be depressurized, while maintaining cabin pressure. The human arm and hand is double protected at this point. The counterpressure protection protects from depressurization. The balloon, and easily be re-inflated, if for some reason that is not working out. It is not perfect. You have a 2 layer glove, but you are not fighting the toil of closing your hand against a balloon glove.
Now if you want to live dangerous, if you can you can take off the balloon glove, and have a counterpressure glove, perhaps even modified to allow small patches of your skin to be directly exposed to Martian atmosphere (Not U.V though). So, dexterous work if required.
This does then put you into some danger, if you cannot successfully get the balloon arm/glove re-attached to the capsule. Therefore such failure modes will have to be planned for, a buddy system is one method to recover from such a situation. Other methods will have to be contemplated.
As for #2, you would need motorized mechanization to move the capsule about in 3 dimensions to provide access to more objects that might exist on the actual Martial world outside of your habitat. Here the safety issue will be to prevent crushing events for the arms in particular, and also with collisions of objects comes the risk of ruptures of pressurized capsules and death from depressurization.
Operating in the fluid environment of a lake provides some relief from the rigors imposed by the typical Martian surface, but of course eventually you have to work on that real Martian surface.
That's what I have for you at this time on the topic.
Oops! a bit of an addition about 5 minutes after the main post here. In the event you could not get your exterior balloon glove back on you would have safety methods without the buddy system if your body inside the capsule was inside of a hybrid suit as well. That is all of your body was protected by an air cooled balloon suit, except for your arms, which would be protected by counterpressure. The way out would either be to depressurize the cabin by voice, or keyboard commands, and then pull the arm/cork out of the port, or just pull it out if you could, quickly and let the cabin depressurize that way. Hopefully no other unprotected person in that cabin. Otherwise to protect further, if you had to perform that stunt, the arm ports could have spring loaded doors that might close before depressurization became lethal.
Think it is possible.
I would like to make an addition pertaining to the last two posts.
1) For Mars, drilling and fracking can be expected to be things that might occur much later, however it is fortunate that ice covered lakes and the inclusion of dune materials into the bottoms of them will serve as a reasonable substitute, until drilling and fracking are possible on Mars. In using salt pond methods, temperatures of significant elevation can be achieved at the bottom of such lakes, the heat held by inhibited convection and insulation. So the bottom of such lakes may substitute in many ways for drilled wells until drilled wells can be accomplished on Mars.
2) Wind power will not occur in significance until the planet is significantly terraformed, but we are fortunate that the cold of the night can generate cryo liquids and solids from the atmosphere of Mars, with assistance.
3) As for Hydricity, that is a capability that would be desired as soon as possible.
GW Johnson,
My last two posts may have seemed excessively dismissive of your comments to the point of perhaps being a bit rude. That is not my intention. I posted this stuff in the "Not So Free Chat", because for this topic I wanted to have the freedom to put emphasis on processes for the Planet Earth. If it is also possible to consider adapting them to Mar, that is OK also.
If you are correct that Thorium is the ultimate answer on Mars, then that's OK with me, but a healthy and prosperous technological/industrial civilization on Earth will promote the settlement of Mars quite a bit, so even then these items may have indirect importance for our common focus of Mars.
If I were to try to join as many of the ideas in the previous post together as possible, I think the following might make some sense.
1) Hot Process: (EGS)
Pump a mixture of Carbonated Salty Water into a well, and include bioleaching as an objective.
2) Cold Process:
Create a liquid air output situation from windmills.
3) Solar process:
Hydridity (Outputs Hydrogen, Oxygen, and superheated steam).
It was not my original objective to focus on the extraction of minerals, but now it seems like it could be important.
In the #1 EGS process you could add Hydrogen, and Oxygen and other chemicals to the Carbonated Salty Water fluid to inject into the well
to feed your microbes which should be selected and engineered to extract minerals from the well. Hydridity should supply some of those.
So, the intention is to bring back up heated fluid with dissolved minerals. This will also tend to etch out the cracks in the rock further.
The water does not have to be that hot to be useful, as it is going to be used to warm up liquid air to turn a turbine. When the water is suddenly cooled, and perhaps the CO2 if allowed to boil out of it, minerals should come out of solution as solids. So, then they could be collected.
As for the #3 Solar process, if you really wanted to during times of high solar output (Sunny weather), it is possible that heat could be injected back into the wells.
Anyway this could be one way that some minerals could be gained in the future for use on the Earth. And with 3 different energy sources, it is naturally fairly balanced as far as energy output meeting demand without major deficiencies.
To adapt to Mars, you would have to use the cold of night for your #2 Cold process.
Of course to a degree this process replicates what happens naturally in ocean vents on Earth.
Void
Hydridity (Yet another scheme)
http://phys.org/news/2015-12-hydricity- … power.html
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/ene … +Spectrum)
Furthermore, this new solar thermal energy design can generate electricity with standalone efficiencies approaching up to an unprecedented 46 percent, researchers say. This is because the high-temperature steam leaving high-pressure turbines can run a succession of lower-pressure turbines, helping make the most of the solar thermal energy the system collects.
Moreover, the hydrogen fuel the system generates can be burned to generate electricity after nightfall, for round-the-clock power. The researchers say the efficiency of this hydrogen-to-electricity system could reach up to 70 percent, comparable to the highest reported hydrogen fuel cell efficiencies.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/hydricity
It is fun to see all these schemes. It is like the beginning of something where there are incredible numbers of variations being tried. Eventually a set of a few will take hold and be maintained. Not necessarily the same set for Earth and Mars.
To do the same thing on Mars, you would need twice as many mirrors or so, but of course what a Hydrogen source (And Oxygen) can do for you on Mars, is massively more important than what it can do on Earth. And on Earth, I am guessing that it's effects can be massive.
I really think we should be considering a future where we could have it all. An increasing standard of living and a healthy planet, and greater freedom from people enslavers.
I think also that for semi-arid areas, if you are deflecting say 80% of the sunlight from hitting the ground by sending it to a solar power tower, you could then bring the moisture level of the soils so shaded up, perhaps up enough for some type of productive agriculture.
Lets say in climates similar to the Dakota's and down to the gulf of Mexico almost.
You might also cause more rain, because instead of reflecting that heat into the sky directly, you put it to work to make electricity and Hydrogen. A cooler sky will allow more rain and snow to form in it. That is how if you can get trees to grow in places, a cooler sky is created, and the potential for precipitation is improved.
Per your comments on Hydrocarbons, I mostly agree.
But if Natural Gas did evolve there, it would likely contain a content of Hydrogen which possibly be reacted against the tiny quantity of Oxygen and Carbon Monoxide in the atmosphere, if that can be extracted economically.
To avoid time wasting, it appears that we can choose not to commit on the certainty of the existence of Natural Gas on Mars. I will settle for a maybe.
However if you read previous posting, it indicates the probability of evolving Hydrogen using a Serpentization process. That might be enhanced with solar heat.
***
Initial sources of energy on Mars can be from devices delivered, and will have to be.
From there, developing Thorium seems to me to be an improbable next energy step. Too complex most likely.
Antius seems to be working on some type of energy source requiring less high tech. Things like that and/or solar will almost certainly have to be the next level.
Perhaps from there you could go to Thorium.
***
After that, other systems can be examined technologically at least. If they cannot deliver for a reasonable cost, then they should be set aside.
Now I will bother you further. I know your qualifications, and certainly I am less likely to understand drilling than someone like you. But for the sake of investigation:
*
Enhanced geothermal system
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_ … mal_system
Unlike hydrothermal, EGS may be feasible anywhere in the world, depending on the economic limits of drill depth. Good locations are over deep granite covered by a 3–5 kilometres (1.9–3.1 mi) layer of insulating sediments that slow heat loss.[6] EGS wells are expected to have a useful life of 20 to 30 years before the outflow temperature drops and the well becomes uneconomic.
*
A HOT DRY ROCK GEOTHERMAL ENERGY CONCEPT
UTILIZING SUPERCRITICAL CO2 INSTEAD OF WATER
https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGA … /Brown.pdf
A novel renewable energy concept -- heat mining using
supercritical CO2 (SCCO2) for both reservoir creation
and heat extraction -- is here proposed. This concept
builds on the earlier, very extensive Hot Dry Rock
(HDR) research and development effort conducted by
Los Alamos National Laboratory at Fenton Hill, NM.
*
Enhanced in Situ Leaching (EISLEACH) Mining by Means of
Supercritical Carbon Dioxide - TOUGHREACT Modeling
https://www.imwa.info/docs/imwa_2014/IM … ab_190.pdf
Abstract Waste rock piles and mine tailings exert severe impact on the environment. Especially, groundwater is a
critical issue when it comes to subsurface mineral extraction. The objective of this paper is to study the physical
and chemical impact of scCO2 on carbonate rock as a minable ore reservoir through numerical simulations by
means of TOUGHREACT. Carbonic acid is formed when scCO2 gets mixed with water; as a result calcite
dissolution occurs. Subsequently, dissolution of calcite creates voids and increases porosity. Even a small increase
in porosity has significant effect on enhancement of permeability and thus leaching efficiency.
Keywords in situ leaching, TOUGHREACT, EISLEACH, supercritical CO2
*
Liquid Air:
Wind Turbines Power Liquid-Air Energy Storage
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/ene … gy-storage
One startup energy company is looking to reinvent not only wind energy, but also energy storage.
Keuka Energy recently launched a 125-kilowatt prototype vessel that uses its novel floating wind turbine design paired with liquid-air energy storage to create a steady source of electricity.
Unlike traditional wind turbines, which have three blades and a central gearbox, Keuka’s turbine is a pinwheel of aluminum blades that sits atop a floating V-shape platform containing liquid air.
The Florida-based company claims that its wind turbine design allows for larger turbines that could produce far more electricity. The world’s largest single offshore wind turbine is currently about 6 megawatts; Keuka says its full-size turbines could produce at least double that amount.
Liquid-air energy storage, also sometimes called cryogenic energy storage, is a long-term energy storage method: electricity liquefies air to nearly -200°C and then stores it at low pressure. When the energy is needed, the liquid air is pumped to a high level of pressure and heated to a gas state. The gas then drives a turbine.
Although it is an attractive energy-storage technology because of its long duration, liquid-air energy storage requires a significant amount of electricity to make the liquid air, limiting its usage by utilities. Keuka claims that because its design substantially reduced the cost by supplying the power directly from the turbines to the liquefaction equipment.
The company also says its wind turbine design is more cost effective, thanks to elimination of the gear box and the use of light-weight aluminum blades that cost less than 10 percent the price of traditional composite blades. Even if the technology is effective and can come in at lower costs, Keuka will likely face a long road to acceptance by the notoriously risk averse utility industry.
Keuka is not the only startup looking to advance liquid-air energy storage. In 2014, General Electric signed an exclusive global licensing deal with Highview Power Storage, a U.K. startup that makes utility-scale liquid-air energy storage systems.
Another similar technology that has gained more traction is compressed-air energy storage, which does not have the energy density of liquid air, but so far has proven more cost effective. Compressed air, while a cheap form of energy storage once built, is still expensive to build and geographically limited; underground caverns are needed to store the air.
Other startups are also looking offshore for cheap energy storage. Bright Energy is developing a system that would use offshore renewable energy to store compressed air in vessels in the ocean. Canadian startup Hydrostor also has a design to store compressed air underwater.
If Keuka’s 125-kilowatt prototype is successful, it plans to launch a larger 25 MW demonstration project in early 2017.
*
Bioleaching
Bioleaching is the extraction of metals from their ores through the use of living organisms. This is much cleaner than the traditional heap leaching using cyanide.[1] Bioleaching is one of several applications within biohydrometallurgy and several methods are used to recover copper, zinc, lead, arsenic, antimony, nickel, molybdenum, gold, silver, and cobalt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bioleaching
***
All of the above except the liquid air will involve drilling.
Not all of them can be done at the same time.
For Mars and CO2 liquid, it is fair to say that due to .38 gravity, drilling could go deeper. However such a technology will be practical only when the industrial/technological infrastructure is rather advanced. Perhaps economical might be to inject a Water/Salt/CO2 mix which should be corrosive. If it can also support microbes, then they might be engineered and selected to help leach metals from the fracked rock. Ideally then you could extract a heated fluid and use that heat as well as dissolved metals.
If the heated fluid is allowed to depressurize, the CO2 might bubble out, and this might actually cause the metals to precipitate as solids.
The CO2. A little foggy here. If a very cold brine absorbs CO2 as dissolved gas, and then that fluid heated up, then CO2 can be made to bubble out. Perhaps run a turbine. The CO2 cooled off, the brine cooled off, the two joined again in a solution, then injected into the well again.
Mining an power perhaps. But it is for a significant time from now.
Otherwise just inject liquid CO2 and allow it to blow out of the well as a pressurized gas.
***
As for on Earth, I think a look at combining EGS;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enhanced_ … mal_system
And wind powered liquid air;
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/ene … gy-storage
Might be worth the trouble. Wind needs a storage method, Liquid Air needs a heating method.
The two together might be rather good.
Maybe the EGS wells will last more that 20-30 years this way also.
As far as the evolution of energy on Earth and in the USA especially goes.
We drop COAL for energy.
Then we drop Oil for energy.
Use up the bulk of the Natural gas, and perhaps get into these renewable methods. Perhaps the culture changes by then and we also go to Thorium reactors on Earth.
I certainly be dead by then so it won't be my decision or problem.
I don't advocate isolationism, except by degree as a prescription.
Rather I advocate taking a favorable posture. Exploiting strengths. I actually think that we are favored from here, but not without challenges. I don't thinking leading with our chin is a good way to intimidate those who want to hurt us.
I don't think we need much immigration at this time, and certainly we should not want to import the dead bones of cultures which smothered on their own evil. They are not useful to us, they are not useful to the greater human purpose, and in truth by stopping them from eating and killing our culture we offer to them also the possibility that eventually the living parts of humanity will be able to rehabilitate them. But they are far too much of a burden now. Like a drowning swimmer, they might pull us to our death as well, if we don't protect what has value in our cultures now. Then there would be no hope for anyone.
As for Energy, we are in luck, but we have to exploit that good fortune to cash in on it.
OPEC's latest move to attempt to recapture market, is only partially successful. It is highly unlikely that they will permanently kill the oil fracking industry. I could be confused, and perhaps will be corrected, but I think what they are really terrified of is our liquid natural gas potential from fracking. It is a massive amount from tight gas, but I do believe that I read that normal natural gas formations can be drilled using fracking with massively increased output.
COAL is already an outdated fuel to some extent. For two reasons. #1, it is just not as attractive as oil and natural gas at the current availability and pricing. #2, popular global culture holds that it is very dangerous to the proposed greenhouse effect situation.
While it may be economically and culturally important to the human race to regulate global climate, that is not what I care about in this calculation. What I care about is that if people believe that global warming is real, then burning Carbon is a global political football.
You can be sure that OPEC has intended to kill the coal industry, and not only with low oil prices, but also I will bet you can find there "Sugar Babies" in our environmental movement, a 5th column attempting to cripple our people into bondage to OIL of OPEC.
We have always had to fend off totalitarianism. These peoples who are attracted to it are also attracted at a fetish level, to the need to dominate and control the "Lower" minions. And the Middle East breeds them like wildfire. Unfortunately for them they are also rather stupid, and we can tip them over rather easily most times.
Stalin was an example of a person coming from the Old Old world and rising to rule over a somewhat newer population.
They wish to indicate that they are going to make sure that you get a share of the pie. Only thing is they take your piece of pie, slice off some for themselves, and for their cronies, and then sure you might get a sliver of pie. Only thing is they are always trying to breed a peasant which can live on little or no pie at all. Eventually they succeed. Dead peasants don't eat any pie.
Back to fuels:
It turns out that the USA and perhaps the world can easily meet the requirements for the reduction in Carbon, by moving to natural gas and renewables. There is also a very good chance that we the USA could export liquid natural gas, to Europe.
We could get paranoid about that where we might think that then our local natural gas prices will go up, but I think on balance it can be a good financial move.
While wars can be a good way to test and advertise military equipment to sell to other nations, I think that the cost to our culture and finances from the two gulf wars has been massive, and we could use some healing space. We may very well have opportunity to mend our finances using natural gas, and renewable energy.
We should try to time our sale of natural gas to the window of opportunity for it's sale. Just like COAL will most likely mostly stay in the ground now, OIL will follow that same pattern eventually, and finally Natural Gas.
We should get our bucks out of it while we can and at the same time do an end run around the environmentalists. Preserve and build our industrial and technological capabilities, and prosper.
We are poised perfectly in so many other ways, the main problem we have is that there are some people who's reality is outdated who keep trying to maintain a time dam, and keep us locked into a previous reality.
And oh!!!!
Why didn't I get any commentary about pushing liquid air down into a fracked rock zone? Make the liquid air with windmills, and push the liquid air down into rock that is at least 160 Degrees F. This then might provide a reservoir that evens out power availability and connects in through time to power need. The energy extracted would be part wind and part geothermal.
Fracking I bet could go much deeper to hotter layers as well I am sure.
And what about this wrinkle for Mars:
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/51 … -fracking/
Yes, I understand that dogma says no hydrocarbons on Mars, but here I am talking about geothermal energy. Push liquid CO2 down, exhaust gas CO2 through a turbine.
(And by the way, if a large https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbonaceous_chondrite impacts Mars, the fractured rock will contain natural gas and perhaps oil as well, since the impact will heat the materials to bake it out).
Plus Serpentization also creates natural gas and perhaps even oil with or without microbes being present.
Why no comments?
I am enjoying every ones work in this topic. It all seems to be good.
Scope: I am interested in trying to contribute to energy obtainment methods from Insitu materials, just after the first settlement has been provided from delivered materials.
Obviously when stimulated by other peoples work, I then try to adapt it to my thinking. This topic has been quiet for a little time, so now I will intrude and hope to add something or maybe just learn more.
So one thing needed is plastic tubing of some kind. That requires Hydrogen, most likely. While you certainly can propose electrolysis of water, this maybe is another way. However it requires the attainment of 200 to 300 degrees Centigrade, so to do it you would most likely want to bring a light weight solar concentrator from Earth at the start.
http://eandt.theiet.org/news/2013/dec/h … livine.cfm
French scientists have managed to produce hydrogen by accelerating natural processes taking place in rocks deep below the Earth’s surface, possibly opening new avenues for hydrogen production.
The team from the University Claude Bernard in Lyon, France, used aluminium oxide to speed up the process by which hydrogen is naturally produced when water interacts with olivine, a common type of rock, under high temperatures and pressures found deep underground.
I risk displaying a broad ignorance, but I am desiring that the above reaction will also provide a clay.
Other substances that might be processed in a similar way are Pyroxine, and Fieldspar.
These may be found on Mars, in Rocks, Dunes, and fine soils.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpentinite
Quote:
Hydrogen production by anaerobic oxidation of fayalite ferrous ions[edit]
In the absence of atmospheric oxygen (O2), in deep geological conditions prevailing far away from Earth atmosphere, hydrogen (H2) is produced by the anaerobic oxidation of ferrous ions (Fe2+) present in the crystal lattice of the iron-endmember fayalite by the protons (H+) of water.[2][3]
Considering three formula units of fayalite (Fe2(SiO4)) for the purpose of stoechiometry and reaction mass balance, four ferrous ions will undergo oxidation by water protons while the two remaining will stay unoxidised. Neglecting the orthosilicate anions not involved in the redox process, it is then possible to schematically write the two half-redox reactions as follows:
4 (Fe2+ → Fe3+ + e−) (oxidation of ferrous ions)2 (H2O + 2 e− → O2− + H2) (reduction of protons into hydrogen)
This leads to the global redox reaction involving ferrous ions oxidation by water:
4 Fe2+ + 2 H2O → 4 Fe3+ + 2 O2− + 2 H2
The two unoxidised ferrous (Fe2+) ions still available in the three formula units of fayalite finally combine with the four ferric (Fe3+) cations and oxide anions (O2−) to form two formula units of magnetite (Fe3O4).Finally, considering the required rearrangement of the orthosilicate anions into free silica (SiO2) and free oxide anions (O2−), it is possible to write the complete reaction of anaerobic oxidation and hydrolysis of fayalite according to the following mass balance:
3 Fe2SiO4 + 2 H2O → 2 Fe3O4 + 3 SiO2 + 3 H2fayalite + water → magnetite + quartz + hydrogen
This reaction closely resembles the Schikorr reaction observed in the anaerobic oxidation of the ferrous hydroxide in contact with water:
3 Fe(OH)2 → Fe3O4 + 2 H2O + H2ferrous hydroxide → magnetite + water + hydrogen
Abiotic methane production on Mars by serpentinization[edit]The presence of traces of methane in the atmosphere of Mars has been hypothesized to be a possible evidence for life on Mars if methane was produced by bacterial activity. Serpentinization has been proposed as an alternative non-biological source for the observed methane traces.[4][5]
So, we might have a source of Hydrogen for plastic tubing, either by electrolysis, or by in situ materials which assist the production of Hydrogen and Methane. Both cases require that some manufactured materials be imported from the Earth/Moon location to establish the initiation of the industrial process of producing Hydrogen in situ on Mars.
I presume that having Hydrogen, you may react it to Martian atmospheric gasses to get what you want. Plastics, Energy.
But you guys are trying to make a KISS power source for Mars. (Keep It Simple Stupid).
So, I will suppose that the preference is to use Hydrogen to produce plastics.
I believe that Antius has been working towards a KISS energy source, and I would like to try to contribute.
Searches by me on the internet suggest that 3D printers can manufacture the plastic tubing that is desired, if you have the plastic.
Conversation with Spacenut elsewhere suggests that clay might even be obtained from dune materials, using a centrifuge. Or if I misunderstood, the Serpentinization process will be required to produce, it, or perhaps clay can be found in places on Mars.
I will presume it can come by some method from dune materials, or loose soils.
So having clay, compressed earth blocks are really possible, I think. Bricks also, but for this purpose bricks would be overkill.
When I was much younger one of my deviant behaviors was to make a 3 sided (Tetrahedron) out of a soil with significant clay content.
I then spray painted one face, the solar face with black paint, when the object was dry enough.
I can testify, that even though I kept it in a porch which was very cold, it could hold significant heat from being exposed to sunshine, so Antius is on to something there.
From my point of view at this time it seems reasonable to construct a thermal diode composed of compressed earth blocks, and plastic tubing, and curtain walls.
You could make a 3 sided or 4 sided pyramid, or a cubic construction with compressed earth blocks, and put curtain walls, on south and north facing walls. You could have plastic fluid filled tube loops which respond to natural thermal convection.
In one part bonded to the south facing curtain wall, and in another part bonded to the north facing curtain wall.
Then heat should be stored at the top of the structure, and cold at the bottom.
You might consider carbonated water as the fluid to drive your turbine process. Heating carbonated water will likely take CO2 out of solution, cooling water will allow you to saturate it with CO2.
You might want an additional antifreeze, such as salts to be involved.
Metal plates? Sure, it just depends how you intend to unfold your expansion into higher and higher technology. But with the above (Which I mostly drew from others), is a lower tech method to get power generation in situ.
Like the ideas about chemicals Terraformer and Lewis.
Tom K. Said:
We have enough problems without importing other people's problems to add to our own. I do not want people wandering around and shooting other people at random such as happened in California, does that sound unreasonable to you or controversial? Anything that would shorten my lifespan, I'm against, and nuts on a religious mission to kill Americans would be in that category.
I very much support your attitude.
Why don't they ask people like me who is invited and who is not in the first place? Does that sound like a funny question? It shouldn't.
Well? Who the hell thinks they can just invite people we don't want?
The whole idea of America was to create a nation not like the old world. It is possible to hope that if you allow the tired and oppressed and so on they might have fair chances of working out.
Otherwise replace the statue of liberty (Which is not essential to the American notion), with the statue of oppression, and invite all of them in, and while you are at it do gun control, and indenture the locals to a middle eastern master, because that is the only realty that they think is correct.
You, (The quislings and collaborators that are holding us down to be raped), should understand what a demon is. You will be held responsible in the end just like all quislings and collaborators.
And as for the Sugar Babies (People who take money and gifts from Middle Eastern and other Sugar Daddies), they should be identified, and held to a very deep suspicion of being against the interests of the American people. This includes people in the environmentalist 5th column who try to stifle our energy independence. Having said that I actually support the evolution away from pollution, as it is also in the interest of the USA and the whole planet. But I do not support OPEC's plan for environmentalism for the USA.
Just my opinion, hope
Bet you didn't think someone like me would point my bayonet the same way you would did you Tom?
I just posted two posts and deleted them. Maybe someone read them. Good then. Otherwise guess.
A wonderful body of knowledge Spacenut.
It reassures me that in fact there is far more that can be done than what I speculated. Dune material is a mishmash of stuff it would seem, but it may have quite a few of the things that will be wanted. And with what you have listed they can actually be obtained.
Wonderful!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dzhokhar_Tsarnaev
The Tsarnaevs were forcibly moved from Chechnya to the Soviet republic of Kyrgyzstan in the years following World War II.[21] His father, Anzor Tsarnaev, is a Chechen, and his mother, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva, is an Avar
Early life[edit]
Tsarnaev was born in Kyrgyzstan. As a child, he emigrated with his family to Russia and then, when he was eight years old, to the United States under political asylum. The family settled in Cambridge and became U.S. permanent residents in March 2007. He became a naturalized U.S. citizen on September 11, 2012, while in college.[1][34][38] His mother, Zubeidat, also became a naturalized U.S. citizen, but it is not clear if his father, Anzor, ever did. Tamerlan, his brother, was unable to naturalize expeditiously due to an investigation against him, which held up the citizenship process.[45] At Cambridge Rindge and Latin School, a public high school, he was an avid wrestler, captain of his high-school wrestling team, and a Greater Boston League winter all-star.[34][42] He sometimes worked as a lifeguard at Harvard University.[46]
In 2011, he contacted a professor at UMass Dartmouth who taught a class about Chechen history, expressing his interest in the topic.[47] He graduated from high school in 2011[34] and the city of Cambridge awarded him a $2,500 scholarship that year.[42] His brother's boxing coach, who had not seen them in a few years at the time of the bombings, said that "the young brother was like a puppy dog, following his older brother".[48][49]
I am going to say that the violent history, and the cultural confusion could have really contributed to the criminal behaviors.
But no he was not a Russian any more than he is (Really) an American. He may have a certificate that says he is an American, but his heart and soul are not.
I am aware of your intentions for the hall weather machine, and solar reflectors.
I am curious, have you ever tried to replicate the greenhouse effects of Venus, or use super greenhouse gasses in your projections?
I would think this would greatly improve the heating effects.
It also might suggest a very large surface ocean planet, but perhaps one without large waves, or dangerous storms. Tropical?
Dissolved minerals in the water as a source to build your floating islands?
So, yes your articles about various deposits are important, but I think that in the beginning it will be fortunate to have 2 or 3 significant materials available in a first settlement at a reasonable distance.
Being able to get stuff from dunes can help you increase the spectrum of available stuff.
Further, I believe from previous reading that micrometeorites survive to enter the "Soil" of Mars. To me that suggests that some Nickel should be present, although it is not mentioned so far.
Also of a great interest to me is to create a hot solar process to create Hydrogen and perhaps even Clay from some part of dune materials.
I have found from reading that basalt materials could oxidize in the presence of water over a number of years, and might change to clay.
I would like to see if you could cook the stuff at a high temperature and get out Hydrogen and Clay in a batch. This could be very useful for the first settlements.
But I am somewhat confused and unsure:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serpentin … _reactions
Serpentinite is formed from olivine via several reactions, some of which are complementary. Olivine is a solid solution between the magnesium-endmember forsterite and the iron-endmember fayalite. Serpentinite reactions 1a and 1b, below, exchange silica between forsterite and fayalite to form serpentine group minerals and magnetite. These are highly exothermic reactions.
So the reaction creates heat, and Hydrogen I believe, and perhaps even clay in some cases?
What happens if you add heat, as in solar heat? Do you get a quicker chemical reaction and perhaps even more Hydrogen?
Once again:
http://space.io9.com/sand-dunes-are-rai … 1678443555
It's raining dunes! Well, no, not really, but these olivine-rich sand dunes on Mars really do look like classic cartoon drawings of raindrops sliding across the landscape.
Pyroxene and Fieldspar may also be present, I am not sure what reactions they will have.
So, I would have hopes that Hydrogen could be obtained in batches at will and perhaps "Burned" in fuel cells against a concentrate of Oxygen and Carbon Monoxide extracted from the atmosphere.
Otherwise, if that can't work of course you would want Hydrogen for various other reasons as well.
So, the dune materials themselves, if I can find anything.
Martian "Soil", which isn't quite dunes, but might be close:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martian_soil
The difference in the concentration of dust in Earth's atmosphere and that of Mars stems from a key factor. On Earth, dust that leaves atmospheric suspension usually gets aggregated into larger particles through the action of soil moisture or gets suspended in oceanic waters. It helps that most of earth's surface is covered by liquid water. Neither process occurs on Mars, leaving deposited dust available for suspension back into the Martian atmosphere.[26] In fact, the composition of Martian atmospheric dust – very similar to surface dust – as observed by the Mars Global Surveyor Thermal Emission Spectrometer, may be volumetrically dominated by composites of plagioclase feldspar and zeolite[27] which can be mechanically derived from Martian basaltic rocks without chemical alteration. Observations of the Mars Exploration Rovers’ magnetic dust traps suggest that about 45% of the elemental iron in atmospheric dust is maximally (3+) oxidized and that nearly half exists in titanomagnetite,[28] both consistent with mechanical derivation of dust with aqueous alteration limited to just thin films of water.[29] Collectively, these observations support the absence of water-driven dust aggregation processes on Mars. Furthermore, wind activity dominates the surface of Mars at present, and the abundant dune fields of Mars can easily yield particles into atmospheric suspension through effects such as larger grains disaggregating fine particles through collisions.[30]
The Martian atmospheric dust particles are generally 3 µm in diameter.[31] It is important to note that while the atmosphere of Mars is thinner, Mars also has a lower gravitational acceleration, so the size of particles that will remain in suspension cannot be estimated with atmospheric thickness alone. Electrostatic and van der Waals forces acting among fine particles introduce additional complexities to calculations. Rigorous modeling of all relevant variables suggests that 3 µm diameter particles can remain in suspension indefinitely at most wind speeds, while particles as large as 20 µm diameter can enter suspension from rest at surface wind turbulence as low as 2 ms−1 or remain in suspension at 0.8 ms−1.[25]
So, then perhaps electrostatic and van der Waals forces can be used to separate the materials to some extent as well.
Chameleon foot stickiness, vs magnetism, electrostatics, centrifugal force, etc.
The Soviets left this behind for us it seems:
http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary. … omagnetite
Titanomagnetite deposits (basically magmatic) occur in association with ultrabasic, basic, and alkalic rocks; they also occur in placers. Titanomagnetite is used in producing iron, titanium, and vanadium.
And here is a method (Perhaps not the method) to extract materials:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar … 6X14001716
Abstract
A novel process for the extraction of iron, titanium, vanadium, and chromium from high-chromium vanadium-bearing titanomagnetite concentrates is proposed. This process involves several steps: partial reduction of the concentrates, magnetic separation, hydrochloric acid leaching of the titanium-bearing tailing, and alkaline desilication of the HCl leach residue. The partial reduction ensures that the vanadium and chromium are predominantly concentrated in the titanium-bearing tailing. Subsequently, magnetic separation is used to recover an iron concentrate with a total iron content of 94.57%. During acid treatment, 90.8% vanadium leaching and 93.4% chromium leaching were obtained, with titanium losses of less than 0.3%. 96.3% of the silicon was removed by alkaline desilication, and titanium-rich slag with a purity of 93.39% was produced. The total recoveries of iron, titanium, vanadium, and chromium under the experimental conditions were 88.3%, 93.7%, 81.7%, and 84.4%, respectively.
I highlighted a fragment about silicon, which I would have to think would be wanted as a material as well.
We are Duned!
http://www.engadget.com/2015/12/11/curi … and-dunes/
http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=mar … ORM=IQFRBA
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/spaceimages/det … d=PIA20171
This view of the undisturbed surface of a Martian sand dune called "High Dune" visited by NASA's Curiosity rover shows coarse grains remaining on the surface after wind removal of smaller particles.
So, what I am seeing in the above suggests that we could entertain various separation methods, in hopes of gaining concentrations of materials we might want. Obviously a vertical column of air flow could do a separation of sorts, although I don't know what that gains you.
Dry or wet magnetic separations might also work. Of course there could be wet flotation methods, and I am wondering if you could do a centrifuging of the materials. If you blew air into the centrifuge to levitate and fluidize the materials, could you get it to settle out in layers, where the layers might have a concentration of particular types of grains?
Of course size and specific gravity will matter in such a separator. So, you will likely like some kind of screens as well, since heavy materials of small grain size might float into the location of lighter materials with a larger grain size (Response of air friction to grain surface area, and of course the specific gravity of grain materials.
But it seems hopeful to me.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/ … Earth.html



Of course the lighting tricks that are used leave you wondering if you are seeing reality, but I think I see enough color variations to suggest that you might even selectively extract patches of materials to get closer to what you want.
As for a car that uses liquid air for steam, and has a powered metal external combustion engine. Of course running out of "Gas" and such problems would be amplified. Liquid air is hazardous if spilled, so yes there will be convenience and safety issues.
Maybe the method could be started in Busses. The USA is geared for busses. With that then some of the safety and practicality issues could be ironed out.