You are not logged in.
zhar2,
Some good reasons to move to other places in the solar system but are they the right reasons for knowledge or capitol return.?
Not to many people moving to the poles of the Earth to make a political statement.
We do some scientific work and have very short expeditions to either pole, but if it cost 1 million dollars per person a day would we even do that?
If those places just had 1 mall on them, you couldn't go outside without special equipment and the outdoor temperature never got above -200c it looses its attractiveness as a place to live.
All places other than Mars in the solar system are that bad or have even worse problems.
Mars is not much better.
Mining on the moon will be to expensive to send anything anywhere other that helium 3 a big if for fusion production on Earth .
Even solid gold found on the moon wouldn't be economical to ship even back to Earth.
Communication stations for Earth would be a difficult prospect for the moon.
The time delay for data and the constant change in Earth Moon position wouldn't make it an ideal natural satellite for communication.
A giant neon (Drink Coke) sign might be economic.
That leaves us with Scientific and knowledge reasons.
A small scientific colony on the Moon makes sense.
A telescope on the moon, launch facilities to Mars and other destinations, fuel facilities are all excellent reasons for a moon colony.
A small colony on Mars excellent insurance against an Earth disaster.
A second Telescope on Mars linked to the Moon telescope would be ideal to look for Earthlike planets directly.
I don't want to sound to negative here, but with everything we do either the return of capitol or the return of knowledge must outweigh the investment.
zhar2,
I think Mars is the only possible place to try and terra form.
At some point in the distant future Venus might be possible but not with current technology.
Living anywhere other than Mars beacons the question why?
Sure we could live on asteroids or europa or Titan or a lot of other destinations but why live on any of them?
The moon as a scientific base i think has merit, or as a launch point to Mars.
If we wanted to colonize Mars we could do it now without having to rework the planet so i think that is what we will do.
No length of time will be needed to terra form Mars because we wont try.
We will just terra form the indoors.
Mesmer,
Welcome...
I guess it all depends on how many Earth like places exist in our Galaxy.
If we find Earth like places are pretty common then spending a very long time turning Mars into an Earthlike place might be a waste of time.
If we guess that we are only a few hundred to a few thousand years from visiting the other earthlike worlds we discover then that would be all the effort and time i think was warranted in Mars.
As soon as it was possible to visit earthlike worlds around other stars then Mars would become a very low priority to try to terra form.
Midoshi,
That is really interesting.
The thought of just drilling down beneath the poles to melt them comes to mind if Mars is that warm below it's surface.
All we would need do is select the lowest points at either pole then drill deep holes to melt above.
Not sure we could melt all the pole with that process, guess it all depends on how warm Mars is underground.
Just thinking about the waste products from converting water into 02 and hydrogen, and C02 into 02 and Carbon.
CH4 (methane)and 3 Carbon for soil building.
If we do discover that we need to separate water and separate C02 we can use up all the waste products as more greenhouse gas and soil amendments.
jumpboy11j,
Partial pressure does come into play with quantity of C02.
The C02 rules change with pressure.
At 125mb total atmosphere we might get away with 20% C02 content.
At 250mb maybe 15%.
At 500mb maybe 10%
The trouble with those partial pressures and percent of C02 is probably none of them have a hope of keeping Mars warm and keeping plant life happy without lots of help.
The obvious solution is just to keep adding bar pressure until C02 levels are both safe and keep Mars warm.
But we must keep in mind to keep things happy for life, for each 100mb we increase the pressure we need around 30mb of N2 and 60mb of oxygen of the total 100mb we increase pressure.
At 1 bar we will probably be in the 1% to 5 % C02 allowable content anyway, so going much beyond 500mb seems like a lot of effort for little gain.
The ideal solution might be a Mars with a total pressure of 150mb.
30mb C02.. about 19% (in life levels maybe)
70mb 02 ...about 49% (all from converted C02 and free 02 released, water separation when needed)
45mb N2 ..about 29% (5mb from Mars gas release, 20 mb bacteria released, 20 mb import)
We have a bit of leeway on 02 % levels so import of N2 might not be needed.
5 mb other gasses including super greenhouse gasses.. about 3% (nearly all made with bacteria on Mars, some trace gasses released at melt)
I think that is the most efficient plan that requires little to no import of any gasses.
We might get away with a 200mb Mars atmosphere with no imports.
Beyond 200mb i think we are stuck with lots of imports.
Now how the heck can we get a melted h20 Mars with just 30mb- 40mb of C02 with whatever content of super greenhouse gasses we choose. ?
We can have C02 content much higher for a time, but the final Mars will need to be no higher than about 40mb C02 of 200mb total.
I think this might be a better way to approach the problem.
1. How much super greenhouse gas do we need to liberate frozen C02.?
2. How much C02 do we liberate.?
3. How much more Super greenhouse gasses do we need beyond that before we begin to liberate H20 vapor at a rate higher than it re freezes.?
Some educated guesses here will give us a final C02 Total for Mars.
We are probably stuck with that quantity of C02 less the percent we can use up when we replace C02 with water vapor warming.
I think if we can't get a formula to keep C02 in the 50mb range or less and keep Mars warm enough to melt H20 we have little hope of making Mars a life friendly atmosphere.
We can't grow anything without liquid water and to get liquid water to form i think Mars will not be a life friendly atmosphere.
We always have the option of altering life to suit Mars.
Just create life that is suited to Mars and not a Mars that is suited to our life.
jumpboy11j,
I personally see about 50mb of C02 as the max for Mars.
At 50mb of C02 even with C02 in 10% concentrations we end up with a 500 mb atmosphere.
Moving 150 mb of filler gas and finding 300mb of 02 i think will be about a maximum we could expect of any terra form plan.
Even doing that is quite the long term project.
Many thousands of years or much longer.
At 50mb of C02 and .1 micro bars SF6 i think we fall well short of anything near the melt point of h20.
We would need a host of different super greenhouse gasses in every spectrum to have any hope of 0c average Mars and the input from water vapor.
After the initial C02 releases and the contributed warmth from super greenhouse gas SF6 and others.
Mars might be semi warm with perhaps 150mb of C02, maybe somewhere around 0c with enough greenhouse gasses and water vapor in the atmosphere.
It would be a toxic place for life on land but probably not toxic for some life in ponds.
Maybe that should be our only goal is to make Mars warm and not worry about how much C02 we end up with.
Making Mars life friendly on the surface seems impossible or at minimum so long term for the import penalties as to be impossible.
For me i see a minimal Mars atmosphere as whatever C02, O2 and N2 is liberated when a healthy dose of super greenhouse gas is mixed in to liberate them.
jumpboy11j,
Underground water deposits should have florine mixed in the water already.
Some water won't have any flourine but some will and the bacteria we design would be very efficient at using it all up.
We should get all sorts of goodies from the ground water for bacteria to grow gas for us, iron, sulphur, flourine, hydrogen, carbon, oxygen etc.
With just that mix of elements we have lots of gas options.
It's really quite a small quantity of super greenhouse gas we need on Mars to get the C02 liberated.
Midoshi,
Ok lets say 10% C02 as a maximum for argument sake.
We are still stuck with a 1 bar atmosphere for Mars.
And that probably won't be a real warm Mars.
Just one of many papers on elevated C02 levels and unexpected plant problems.
Was a short one so thought it would make for interesting reading.
............
Doubling the concentration of atmospheric CO2 often inhibits plant respiration, but the mechanistic basis of this effect is unknown. We investigated the direct effects of increasing the concentration of CO2 by 360 [mu]L L-1 above ambient on O2 uptake in isolated mitochondria from soybean (Glycine max L. cv Ransom) cotyledons. Increasing the CO2 concentration inhibited the oxidation of succinate, external NADH, and succinate and external NADH combined. The inhibition was greater when mitochondria were preincubated for 10 min in the presence of the elevated CO2 concentration prior to the measurement of O2 uptake. Elevated CO2 concentration inhibited the salicylhydroxamic acid-resistant cytochrome pathway, but had no direct effect on the cyanide-resistant alternative pathway. We also investigated the direct effects of elevated CO2 concentration on the activities of cytochrome c oxidase and succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and found that the activity of both enzymes was inhibited. The kinetics of inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase were time-dependent. The level of SDH inhibition depended on the concentration of succinate in the reaction mixture. Direct inhibition of respiration by elevated CO2 in plants and intact tissues may be due at least in part to the inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase and SDH.
................................
Final Atmosphere:
20 kPa (200 mb) O2
10 kPa (100 mb) CO2
8.8 kPa (88 mb) N2
1 kPa (10 mb) H2O
0.2 kPa (2 mb) NH3
Total: 40 kPa (400 mb)
...............................
At 100 mb of C02 in this 400mb atmosphere we have a total of 25% C02.
In a 400mb atmosphere, i think around 5% would be the maximum amount of C02 we could expect life to endure at 400mb.
100mb of C02 will require an atmosphere of around 1.5- 2 bars total to be at 5% C02.
1 bar of atmosphere on earth and 2% C02 is pushing the limits for life.
So a 1.5 -2 bar atmosphere on Mars would require C02 levels to be maybe 1.75% or less of the total atmosphere.
We might get away with 5% C02 since 02 levels would be much higher, so a 2 bar atmosphere would be a minimum for 100mb of C02.
No math works for 100mb C02 as the primary warming gas on Mars if we also expect it to be a terra formed place for life.
It's not realistic to think of a 2 bar Martian atmosphere, so we need something other than C02 as the main warming gas, or at minimum we need much less C02 reliance on warming allowing us to have C02 in realistic totals for life.
Or we need to alter life for Mars.
Just my opinion on the C02 math problem for Mars.
jumpboy11j,
"The ammonia may help to counter CO2 blood acidosis"
Interesting idea to allow us higher C02 levels.
Would the same thing work on plants?
dunwich,
Great idea with anaerobic bacteria.
Mars right now at some depths and locations should be warm and wet enough to seed bacteria like that.
We could engineer all sorts of custom bacteria to produce all sorts of super greenhouse gasses on Mars in those areas that have liquid water beneath the surface.
All we would need is a drilling machine and a packet of those custom bacteria, place them into the bacteria friendly locations.
The drilling machines could be mobile so they can seed all of Mars underground water resources.
Time scales might be a problem to show any buildup of gasses in Mars atmosphere, but they will accumulate over time.
We can engineer custom bacteria to make copious amounts of the gas or gasses we choose.
We are sure to have all sorts of chemicals mixed in that ground water, so sky is the limit for gasses we can have bacteria create.
Might be a great way to get Mars warm enough so all the frozen C02 starts to release from the frozen layers.
Interesting thought and efficient possible way to warm mars with little input from us.
Wonder how much Methane, PFC's, etc we would need and the time scale for bacteria to create that?
A snippet from an article on Super greenhouse warming of Mars.
........
The researchers say that adding approximately 300 parts per million of the gas mixture in the current Martian atmosphere, which is the equivalent of nearly two parts per million in an Earth-like atmosphere, would spark a runaway greenhouse effect, creating an instability in the polar ice sheets that would slowly evaporate the frozen carbon dioxide on the planet's surface.
http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/200501 … _sys.shtml
..................................
A snippet from an article about Mars liquid water.
...
Liquid water apparently carved Mars's large channels, its smaller valleys, and its young gullies. In addition, there are vast quantities of ice within about 3 feet (1 meter) of the surface near the south pole and perhaps near the north pole. Thus, water apparently has existed near the surface over much of the planet's history. And water is probably present beneath the surface today, kept liquid by Mars's internal heat
http://www.nasa.gov/worldbook/mars_worldbook.html
.............................................
Hi Midoshi,
Thanks for the details about C02 needs for Mars.
Not sure what i was remembering, maybe minimum C02 totals with super greenhouse gas totals included.
Never pays to use your memory only. LOL
So an absolute minimum C02 pressure we need on Mars to keep the chill off might be 200mb of just C02.?
With that maybe 1mb of super greenhouse gas and we get close to or just above 0c at the equator as an average most of the time.?
If 200mb of C02 is needed for warmth and it can only be 10%- 15% of the total atmosphere, i think a minimal terra form atmosphere is impossible on Mars.
We would need 600mb N2 import and 1+bar 02 import for that atmosphere. (ouch)
Unless someone can come up with a super greenhouse gas formula Vs C02 for Mars i think the idea is dead in the water.
I think we have 3 options.
1. Engineer organisms that can live with mostly C02 for Mars.
2. Just warm Mars and give up the idea of an earthlike place with land life, concentrate on Water life.
3. Don't do anything other than create domed structures.
SpaceNut,
15% C02 only in a 150mb atmosphere with 55% O2.
As we lower the bar pressure we can sneak up C02 levels that would be toxic on Earth.
It's an even worse formula for C02 than you would expect on Earth.
2% C02 is getting close to what most forms of life can tolerate all the time on Earth, 5% for short terms.
I think 15% C02 is pushing right on an absolute maximum for Mars with 150mb.
10% or less would be much better.
I don't think we have any chance of C02 15mb or even 22.5mb getting or keeping Mars warm.
Think we are stuck with not only having to import N2 as buffer gas, but we will have to import or create maybe 2mb of super greenhouse gasses for warming.
I've tried to keep the mb pressure as low as i can to keep importation of N2 down as small as possible.
Each 100mb increase of atmospheric pressure total for Mars equals 30 mb of N2 import.
I think 150 mb pressure and most of life would adapt to it.
150mb pressure also has a different boil point of water, i don't think it would come into play on Mars but something to keep in mind before we get to 150mb.
No reason we couldn't continue to import N2 even after the 150 mb pressure is reached.
Adding more of N2 beyond 150mb wont alter the makeup of the atmosphere in any adverse way, so we could keep adding N2 until it's at earthlike levels as a permanent project.
jumpboy11j,
Going just on memory here because i can't find the original posts.
I believe 70mb of C02 just warms Mars enough to keep Mars at 0c or just at melt point as an average temperature.
Not sure what temperature Mars would be at 90mb of just C02 but i would guess maybe 5c something like that.
From the reading i have done on clathrates on Mars in the last while recent opinion seems to think most of it is just h20, just some C02, trace amounts of methane N2 etc.
As for clathrates totals on Mars, if it's mostly frozen H20 we will be well below 70mb of C02.
This isn't a big issue other than having to replace that total of greenhouse heating with other gasses.
I agree total on the N2 import on Mars, everything we can do to lower the needs of a filler gas would be welcomed on Mars.
I think the best thing we can do is make Mars a lower pressure world that stays warm with no more than 15% of the final gas being C02.
Whatever that pressure is it should be safe for most forms of life and have the ability to absorb most of the UV in the atmosphere.
The N2 import burden of a thicker atmosphere i think kills the idea of a 300 or 400 or 500mb atmosphere.
We should probably aim for maybe 150mb total atmosphere that requires only 45 mb of N2 import. (still a lot)
jumpboy11j,
I've been working on this problem and come to a conclusion about a secondary problem with C02 on Mars.
I personally think we could resolve quite a bit of the toxicity problems and bar quantity problems of C02 with small amounts of Methane or super greenhouse gasses in it's place.
Our main goal for C02 is warming Mars so we can use whatever we like for that.
1% C02 will be more than enough for life so we really don't need more than that.
I seem to remember a long discussion about C02 quantity to keep Mars warm and if i remember right it was 70mb.
If we do the math on 70mb as 15% of the total atmosphere, we would need way to much total bar pressure for C02 to work as the main greenhouse gas.
If we have C02 as more than 15% of the total atmosphere it probably won't support life.
I figure something like this will work for all the gas percentage needs of animal and plant life and to keep Mars warm.
1% - 15% C02
50% - 60% 02
30% - 40% N2
1%- 5% Other. (Some can be methane or other super greenhouse gasses to decrease C02 needs and lower final bar pressure needs)
Working out the total bar pressure for each gas would require the heating totals for Mars of C02/methane/super greenhouse gas.
If we replace most of the C02 warming with super greenhouse gasses we could also lower 02, N2 and C02 needs, we make a much thinner atmosphere that stays warm.
Methane or other super greenhouse gasses will require much lower final bar pressures to do the same job as 15% of a C02 atmosphere would.
It would require much less time and much less work than having to create a nearly 500mb atmosphere to keep 02 and C02 in life levels, the import of large quantities of filler gas and to have C02 keep Mars warm.
We still need to import N2 in a lower bar pressure Mars just as a filler gas, but with much lower bar pressure needs for warmth the N2 quantity needed would be much smaller.
We would be just importing enough to balance the other gasses.
At first glance this minimal Mars atmosphere topic seems simple but it is quite complex infact.
dunwich,
I guess if we had to much oxygen on Mars the most simple solution would be some big fires.
We are already pretty good at converting oxygen to C02 on earth so i doubt we would need anything other than a similar lifestyle on Mars. LOL
Midoshi,
I can't figure why more studies are not done on minimum levels and maximum levels for plants for C02 and 02 combinations and the n2 fixing cycle of bacteria in n2 poor places such as Mars.
With all the thought about some day colonizing Mars you would think these basic studies would have been done long ago.
Even greenhouse domes would need this basic info on Mars if we plan to grow plants and not be permanent nitrate miners.
We sure could spread out nitrate around the planet to get plants going.
Down side to that is we become the nitrate cycle for plants when natural process don't replace the nitrate at the rate it is used.
With a bit of bio engineering we could probably alter the bacteria to fix nitrogen more efficiently so poor quantities of nitrogen might not be a big problem.
With the same sort of engineering we could probably have plants happy in 30+% C02 60+% 02 at 1/3 bar.
Or even the best of both with plants that have an efficient nitrogen fixing gene and high tolerance to C02 gene incorporated into the cell structure.
Nature would do this itself on Mars over long periods of time, so we would just be accelerating that process.
Much like animals that have high tolerance to C02 levels will be naturally selected on Mars.
Nature would quickly adapt all forms of life on Mars through natural selection.
I would guess in as little as 10-20 generations what we put on Mars will only look semi familiar to what we placed as the originals.
The long term effects of 30% C02 60% 02 at 1/3 bar on animals and plants and bacteria is sure to alter life very fast at best, at worse create a very high mutation rate.
With 1/3 gravity, additional UV radiation, additional cosmic ray doses added into the mix we would end up with some pretty odd plants and animals when they settled into normal natural selection.
I think the basic idea of the 326mb Mars atmosphere might work, but we probably won't be placing natural Earth organisms on it.
If we do they won't stay that way for long anyway.
dunwich,
Anammox bacteria would be an excellent addition to the watery places.
The toxic brew, chemical rich, oxygen poor water will need lots of opportunistic and tough bacteria on Mars for the first while.
Hi Midoshi,
On Earth plants beyond 30% O2 content have a very difficult time collecting C02.
Since levels of C02 would be much higher on Mars and pressures much lower i can't see it as a big problem.
A real unknown though how plants function at much higher levels of O2 and C02 in lower pressure with just trace amounts of N2.
It's nice to see that high levels of both almost work together, but i still see 30% C02 as a problem even in a 326 mb atmosphere.
We also need to think about the bacteria that fix nitrogen in this atmosphere scenario.
How do they function in that atmosphere, can they tolerate 60% 02 with 30% C02 with 1% N2.?
Bacteria are tough life forms so they probably would survive, but would they fix enough N2 for the plants.
I have a gut feeling around 10% C02 as a comfortable level for Mars at 1/3 bar.
I also have a feeling 1% N2 although more than enough for plants, won't be enough for the bacteria to fix it well.
Thanks for the interesting data on your posts.
Interesting reading.
Hi RickSmith,
Tough to wrap the mind around the lower pressure on Mars and % of things.(Earth Bias) lol
I would have guessed at 60% 02 we were much closer to the combustion point of oxygen, nice to see that it's still well within safe levels.
As soon as we started teraforming Mars we would be adding methane, hydrogen and other fuels to the atmosphere so it's nice to see we have some margins at that level of oxygen.
C02 i still think is the main problem to teraforming Mars.
We have such a limited % that will work for keeping the planet warm and keeping life in safe levels and plants at safe levels.
I think we are stuck somewhere around 10% total weight of C02 in a 326 mb atmosphere.
As the bar pressure goes up so should the C02 % go down to stay safe.
We also need that % of C02 to keep Mars warm, so it's a game of what % C02 works on Mars for everything.
In a 150mb atmosphere we might get away with 20% C02, a 500 mb atmosphere more like 5%.
N2 we really don't need a lot of to keep plants happy so 5 mb will work well.
With some luck just out gassing at Mars will produce that.
Bet not though.
CO2: ....... 120 mbar.
O2: ......... 200 mbar.
N2 .............. 5 mbar. (Plants can now fix nitrogen.)
Ar ............... 1 mbar.
Wouldn't 60+% O2 simply self combust in 326 mb pressure?
It's very close maybe beyond combustion.
Not even sure any plant on Earth can grow in such an oxygen rich environment.
Would plants even grow at with 30+% CO2 at 326 mb pressure?
Beyond safe limits for both C02 and 02 i believe.
At one bar on Earth 30% O2 is about a max before it would self combust.
4% - 5% CO2 a max for plant growth at 1 bar for temporary periods.
2% for sustained plant growth.
6% - 10% i think is a constant max for CO2 on Mars at 1/3 bar for plants to sustain growth.
30%-50% 02 i think a max for plant respiration. (unknown)
We could probably live in the set numbers for a 326 mb atmosphere but i doubt plants will, and no smoking on the planet for fear of a global fire.
I think if you add around 150 mb N2 and decrease C02 50 % you get pretty close to safe levels for 02 and C02 for us and plants.
So maybe something like this.
CO2: ..........60 mbar.
O2: .......... 200 mbar.
N2 ........... 155 mbar.
Ar ............... 1 mbar.
Would 60mb C02 keep Mars warm though in a 416mb atmosphere or any atmospheric pressure we select.
I think we need to select how much C02 Mars needs to stay warm first, then select 02 as a filler with no more than 50% of the total final volume being 02 and 40% probably a safer number for plants, then the remaining amount will have to be an inert gas probably N2 and trace other gasses.
Hi RickSmith,
I agree the idea won't work on a body without an atmosphere.
We can't cheat on Ceres to dump rotational energy to the atmosphere.
It might work on Mars because we can dump rotational energy to the atmosphere.
If we fire west with just enough force to soak most of the launch energy into the atmosphere the impactor returns with no east energy.
Now all we would need is a reason to do such a thing on Mars.
To true about moving Ceres being a bit off topic.
Started as a way to re start the core of Mars but the mechanics of moving it expanded it.
A little more thought on the mag launcher for a different use.
Using a mag launcher on one side of Mars we could place as many impactors as we like in one spot on the other side of the planet.
The escape velocities on Mars should allow for a mag launcher to get mass into temporary predictable orbits and de orbits.
Not only would this eventually re start the core, it would release masses of gas from the constant impacts helping to thicken the atmosphere.
If we had a polar impact site we would get the best of both at once since the constant impact heat will melt a large area of that pole.
If we use ice from the other pole as the impact mass we really accelerate the atmosphere thickening process.