You are not logged in.

Announcement

Announcement: This forum is accepting new registrations via email. Please see Recruiting Topic for additional information. Write newmarsmember[at_symbol]gmail.com.
  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

#51 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-10 05:56:54

(th) per your comments: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 41#p239241

I suppose that a sphere may describe a balloon like structure, although not all balloons have to be spherical.

This particular shell, unlike other shell worlds I have seen description for, would be like putting bubble warp on top of s swimming pool.

The Bubble Wrap itself has flotation properties on top of the heavy fluid, but the lighter fluid can float on top of the bubble wrap layer.

For Venus, the Toxic gas mix would dominantly be of CO2, but may include also N2, SO3, H20, represents the water.

The desired N2/O2 mix on top represents the air fluid above the swimming pool.

Instead of a bubble wrap parturition though the Venus shell would more be composed of multiple decks.  And probably those to be divided into cellular chambers.

A different sort of the device would allow the gas mix above and below to be the same mix, and might have holes that have turbines in them. Cold air on the night side would fall though and hat air on the day side would rise to turn the turbines.

But you would not have a sky of breathable air in that case, and would need a space suit to survive on the "Surface".

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Venus presents an interesting case.  If we think that all terrestrial planets started as Hycean worlds, then could we have had a Venus at 2 AU out in a solar system? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hycean_planet

The formation of planets appears to be a somewhat random process so that might happen, for various sized stars.

The planet would start warm and have a greenhouse effect as long as its Hycean Atmosphere was retained.

But depending on the size of the planet and other factors such as type of star and Thea type impactors the early atmosphere might be swept away, just is it has been for our four terrestrial planets.

I think then there would be a Venus like atmosphere remnant for a while.  if CO2 could be incorporated into rocks then you might end up with a 3 bar N2 dominated atmosphere.  If not then an atmosphere like that of Venus might exist even at the condition of 2 AU for our type of star.

This presumes a balance of power where volcanism may emit CO2 faster than water processes can incorporate it into rock.

We know that for the 3 Bar atmosphere of the proposed 2 AU Venus that atmosphere might persist in our solar system, because our Venus can retain most of it's Nitrogen, and Titan is warm enough for a N2 Atmosphere.

So, it might be that a planet with water could exist with liquid water, beyond the so called habitable zone.

For a M type star which is very erosive of atmospheres this might be possible mercy.  At the "Equivalent" sunlight of 2 AU the solar flux would be .25 (1/4) that of Earth, (Sort of).  The Erosive nature of the solar wind of that star might also be reduced to .25 (1/40) that of the center of the "Habitable" zone.

At that greater distance, it is perhaps less likely that the planet may be tidal locked.

Of course planets that far out for some stars will be harder to detect.

Hopefully I got my math correct.  I did not sleep particularly well last night.

Anyway, Venus type pathways, might lead to some interesting planets around other stars.

Add a magnetic field and maybe it would be more habitable on the surface or in the clouds.

Ending Pending smile

#52 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-09 18:42:49

(th) per your comments: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 38#p239238

Thankyou for your interest.

A shell method for Venus could be of varous types.

The one I showed is just one.  It could have 10 shells with structural members connecting each, to give best strength.

The weather under the shell would be relatively static, I think if the current status of the lower atmosphere could be approximately preserved.
That is non-convective.  The toxic gasses would all be kept there.

The situation would resemble a waterbed.  A heavier fluid inside the enclosure and air outside it.

As I see it perhaps the outer three shells would be like wiffle balls with openings, to let some light though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiffle_ball
Image Quote: Wiffle_ball.jpg
With each of the 3 layers, less and less light and wind would transfer though.

For the lower layers, this also might mitigate the problem of frost.

Presuming that the shell can rotate 1 time per day, that could help near the "Equator".

But the poles may be alternately tilted into the sunlight periodically to simulate seasons.  Efforts might be made to limit ice buildups.

While it might be desirable to have solar panels, it might also be desirable to make the albedo favorable to desires.  Polar areas less reflective and equatorial areas more reflective on average.

But I fear there could be severe wind storms, so at times it would be dangerous to be too far exposed in the 3 upper layers.

But then 7 lower layers would offer sanctuary.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I have also considered lesser concepts, such as a hoop that extends around the circumference of the planet at the good pressure and temperatures.  In that case though you cannot have an open-air environment, it must be enclosed and roofed over to keep the toxic gasses at bay.

Thankyou for your interest (th).

Ending Pending smile

#53 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-09 15:14:21

This post can be given association with the 2 most previous posts.

Some people have proposed shell worlds, for terraforming some hard case worlds.

I have at times suggested shells within the atmosphere of Venus. 

A singular shell might divide toxic gasses from a breathable atmosphere.

In such a case the planet would no longer be a solar collector in the manner that it is now.  In that case it might be desired to heat the lower layer by some means like microwaves to keep it in a static condition.

Here is a wiki on some types of shell worlds: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shellworld

It does not seem to list the types I have suggested for Venus.

FAyf0UH.png

Such a shell would not necessarily separate the gasses of the atmosphere as the drawing above suggests.

But for the drawing above the shell might have multiple layers.

And a sort of shading shell on top that also would be a wind break.

I think that the N2/O2 atmosphere might be extremely windy. So you might want to be under a wind break that also shaded you.  And these structures would need to be very strong.

Also, you would have to limit the amount of water above the shell to prevent massive accumulations of ice, snow, and water.

The bulk of water might be stored in lower shell partitions and have artificial light.

The maintenance of this system would require lots of robots with at least the intelligence of bees.

Power from solar and wind would be very abundant.  Also, on the night side heat could be radiated to create electricity.

So quote from #533:

So, in reference to the just prior post, the development of Venus, (If it is lifeless), might have 3 stages based on the method for rocky materials.
1) Venus Crossing Asteroids.
2) Venus Aircraft Method.
3) Giant machine trees that reach from the ground all the way up to 1/3 bar pressure perhaps.

So we might name the idea in the post as:
4) Venus Shell world.

Perhaps Venus would transition 1-4 to get to such a place.

If you did then people could walk outside in a N2/O2 atmosphere of 1/2 to 1 bar pressure.

The shell might even rotate to give a day/night cycle, maybe 4 Earth Days Lone?


But the people of the future may choose what they want if they have the means to do it.

Ending Pending smile

#54 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-09 09:13:04

So, in reference to the just prior post, the development of Venus, (If it is lifeless), might have 3 stages based on the method for rocky materials.
1) Venus Crossing Asteroids.
2) Venus Aircraft Method.
3) Giant machine trees that reach from the ground all the way up to 1/3 bar pressure perhaps.

Obviously #3 is going to force humans to stretch their reach of abilities.

But condensed fluids could flow down (Generating Electricity), and cool domes and lava tubes and tunnels and vaults, and the fluid boiling could make electricity and cool those structures.

As for the Sulfuric Acid, if a mix of Water and Sulfuric acid were the fluid, the heat would cause the Sulfuric acid to decompose into water vapor and Sulfur Oxides.

So, the Atmosphere might be made less acid by this method, I hope.

To possibility of adding a Ozone Layer would also reduce the production of acid.

The whole of Venus would be a giant solar engine.

Should particles and greenhouse gasses be used to heat and expand the atmosphere, then adjustments would be needed, and floating assets would have to float higher.

With an expanded atmosphere, it might be necessary to generate a magnetic field for the planet to keep the solar wind from stripping the atmosphere away.

If Venus could be utilized this way, and if the human race ever travels to other stars, then worlds like Venus might have high value.

Ending Pending smile

#55 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-09 08:12:56

I have seen an article about lava tubes on Venus.  The first thoughts are well that will be very hot.
https://www.newscientist.com/article/24 … yre-weird/
Quote:

Space
Venus has lava tubes, and they're weird
It has been suggested that lava tubes - underground tunnels carved out by molten rock - might be on Venus, and now we have direct evidence that this is the case

By Alex Wilkins

22 September 2025

Quote:

Copilot Search Branding

Like

Dislike
Venus has lava tubes, and they're weird | New Scientist
Recent discoveries have confirmed the existence of massive lava tubes on Venus, which are surprisingly large and differ significantly from those found on Earth and Mars.
Discovery and Characteristics
Researchers have found compelling evidence of lava tubes on Venus, which are underground tunnels formed by molten rock. These tubes are created when lava flows beneath the surface, cooling and solidifying while the molten rock continues to move. Once the lava drains away, it leaves behind a hollow tube. Recent studies led by Barbara De Toffoli from the University of Padova have identified these tubes using radar and mapping data from past missions, particularly around large shield volcanoes on the planet.

What I will suggest now is for those who may thing big.

I do think that the mining of the surface of Venus will be possible.

Several factors are needed for this probably.
-Electronics that work at high temperature.
-An energy source on the surface are a good start.

I am of course thinking that the "Miners" will be robots. 

Do people aver think of making a dome on the surface of Venus, perhaps out of an acid and heat tolerant rock material.

Elsewhere and perhaps else when I have contemplated Dump-Aircraft that could deliver cryogenic fluids to the surface.
-Nitrogen?
-CO2?
-Water?
-Sulfuric Acid?

The aircraft can have characteristics of:
-Lighter than Air Ships.
-Giders.
-Airplanes.


While it is proposed to have air filled habitats at a suitable altitude of somewhat temperate character,  It may be that technology will develop balloons that can contain Hydrogen long term.

https://infinityturbine.com/liftgenx-hy … rbine.html

Quote:

Balloons that can hold hydrogen long term are being developed for various applications, particularly in military and environmental contexts.
Hydrogen gas balloons are emerging as a revolutionary solution for military operations, capable of lifting heavy payloads and supporting prolonged missions.
1
Zero-pressure balloons are designed to extend the operational lifespan of balloons by allowing hydrogen to vent out, preventing bursting.
1
Solid-state hydrogen gas generators are being developed for meteorological balloons, providing a scalable solution for inflating balloons in remote areas.
1
The U.S. Navy is testing hydrogen-powered balloons paired with fuel-cell-powered drones, enhancing surveillance capabilities in remote environments.
1

These innovations highlight the potential of hydrogen balloons for long-term applications, particularly in military and environmental scenarios.

Energy is very important for a civilization.  Venus had cold at altitude and hat at the surface.  Very hot.

An aircraft could be filled with a cryogenic fluid or water or even Sulfuric Acid as ballast.

It could be released to glide down to the surface.  Upon contacting a sewer grate on top of a dome or lava tube, it could release its ballast.

Then being lightened, it might ascend back upwards by some means.  Boiling Nitrogen or Water could power an engine to provide the reaction.  A tank now filled with hot Nitrogen might provide lift.


ssNuoKY.png

Now you can provide a improve environment with electrical power for your mining robots.

It may be a bit cooler, and exclude the acid, and so then also add massive electric power, so long as a liquid is supplied by some means such as aircraft or even perhaps someday a vertical pipeline.

A Vertical pipeline could also provide an elevator.

Ending Pending smile













.

#56 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-08 15:07:42

(th) said: https://newmars.com/forums/viewtopic.ph … 15#p239215
Quote:

tahanson43206
Moderator
Registered: 2018-04-27
Posts: 24,560
Email
For Void re orbits of Venus and Earth...

Your initiative recently could be helpful to readers who might want to learn how to calculate the orbits of the two planets at various altitudes.

It appears your phone is smart enough to help your readers to understand how to perform the calculations.

There are multiple factors that work together to set the velocity of an object in orbit.  Your presentation omits some of that detail, but perhaps your phone would be willing to provide it if you were to ask.

(th)

You are not wrong.  It would be good at some point to better develop and perfect the line of thinking.

But if you consider that perhaps my process is like hunting, I am collecting clues and making evaluations of worth of investment.

My reason to chase this path is that it seems that Venus may be more a thing of value than previous evaluations proposed.

If the clouds of Venus are indeed 60% water instead of almost all Sulfuric Acid, the cloud city thing makes a little more sense.

A problem with Venus is that the idea of Space Elevator will not work.

But if it is possible to create a Very Low Venus Orbit Perch, then the task of linking Cloud Cities with Orbit is more viable.  (If it can be done).  Earth and Mars have a Moon(s) but Venus does not.  So, the potentials are not that similar.

Three technologies might assist the development of Venus:
1) Venus Water <> Stony Asteroids might provide basic needs in Venus orbit.
     -Water might be moved to the asteroids from Venus, using Carbon solar sails.
     -Robots might make machines from the Stony Asteroids that could aerobrake into orbit of Venus.
2) Perching in a Very Low Venus Orbit.
     -Stony Asteroid materials might be able to be used in electric propulsion.
     -Nitrogen from the Venus atmosphere, might be used as electric rocket propulsion.
     -Carbon might be used in an electric propulsive method.
     -The atmosphere of Venus might provide chemical propellants for spaceships using Oxygen and Carbon, Nitrogen.
3) A process to swell up the atmosphere of Venus, might make it easier to extract the materials of the Atmosphere.
     -Nano Particles proposed and greenhouse gasses proposed to heat Mars may be used to heat and swell Venus.
     -Asteroids impacting Venus may also heat it.  (This has been proposed in the past).
     --A artificial Magnetic Field might be employed to reduce atmospheric losses under these treatments.
     -The Nitrogen and Carbon of Venus as well as the small amount of water are potentially very valuable.

So, rather than to convert Venus to an Earth with expenses and little profit in the short term, we could find a way to make Venus profitable to a solar system economy.  While the outer Solar System has lots of these resources, joining what Venus potentially can provide with what stony asteroid may provide, may allow the creation of air-filled artificial habitats in orbit of Venus.

And the solar energy is about 1.9 times that available in Earth orbit.

So, perhaps a rich province in the Solar System Civilization that maybe can be made to emerge.

Ending Pending smile

#57 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-08 07:16:59

Elon Musk has said that if Earth were just a little bit bigger with more gravity, accessing space might have been impossible.

So, Venus being about 90% per gravity, may offer an easier platform.  Granted the surface is hell, but if it was habitable for billions of years, a SSTO method might have worked for accessing orbit.  But it does not have a Moon, so we can be grateful for the favors we seem to have.

It has been very hard for me to get a good answer to "What is the speed of a lowest orbit around planet Venus?"

As usual, my computer is not as good as my phone to get information. 

But.........."A low orbit around Venus, Just above it's dense atmosphere requires  a orbital speed of approximately 7 km/s (25,200 km/hor~ 15,600 mph)"  (That is what I got on my phone).

What is the speed of LEO?

Quote:

Approximately 17,000 miles per hour
The speed of satellites in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) is approximately 17,000 miles per hour (about 27,000 kilometers per hour). This speed is necessary to maintain a stable orbit around the Earth, as it balances the gravitational pull and the forward momentum required to keep the satellite in orbit.
Wikipedia
+2

So, about 2000 km/hour difference with Venus being less.

My understand that air braking heating is not linear to speed.

Is air braking speed linear to aerobraking heating of a spacecraft?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerobraking
Quote:

Not linear
The relationship between air braking speed and aerobraking heating of a spacecraft is not linear. Aerobraking involves the use of atmospheric drag to slow the spacecraft's velocity, which can lead to heating due to the frictional resistance of the air. The heating effect is not directly proportional to the speed of the braking but rather to the amount of drag applied and the duration of the braking process. The aerodynamic forces exerted by the atmosphere during aerobraking can significantly affect the spacecraft's temperature and, consequently, its heating.

So, my impression is that even a 1800 km/hr reduction in velocity will be more significant than the number suggests.

So, I am inclined to think that a Starship equipped to enter the Earth's atmosphere might do better in entering the upper atmosphere of Venus.

VELO is very hard (It is for Earth), and I presume to work at all it may need to use the planets spin as an aid.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_low_Earth_orbit
Quote:

Very Low Earth Orbit (VLEO) refers to orbital altitudes below 400 kilometers (about 250 miles) above the Earth's surface, offering unique advantages for satellite operations.
Definition and Characteristics
Very Low Earth Orbit (VLEO) is defined as the region of space where satellites operate at altitudes typically ranging from 150 to 400 kilometers (approximately 93 to 250 miles). This proximity to Earth allows for several operational benefits, including reduced signal latency and enhanced imaging capabilities.
Wikipedia
+1
Advantages of VLEO
Reduced Signal Latency: Satellites in VLEO can transmit data with significantly lower latency due to their closer distance to Earth, which is crucial for real-time applications like remote sensing and communication networks.
2
Improved Imaging Resolution: The closer proximity allows VLEO satellites to capture higher-resolution images, making them ideal for applications such as environmental monitoring and urban planning.
2
Lower Launch Costs: Launching satellites into VLEO requires less energy compared to higher orbits, potentially reducing overall launch costs and allowing for the use of smaller launch vehicles.
2
Natural Deorbiting: Due to atmospheric drag, VLEO satellites tend to deorbit more quickly at the end of their operational life, which helps mitigate the issue of space debris.
2


3 Sources
Challenges of VLEO
Significant Atmospheric Drag: The denser atmosphere at these altitudes creates substantial drag, necessitating frequent propulsion adjustments to maintain orbit, which can increase operational complexity and fuel requirements.
2
Corrosion and Material Challenges: Satellites in VLEO are exposed to elements like atomic oxygen, which can corrode and damage spacecraft materials, requiring robust design and materials.
2
Shorter Operational Lifespan: The high atmospheric drag can lead to a shorter operational lifespan for satellites unless they are equipped with efficient propulsion systems.
1


3 Sources
Applications
VLEO is gaining interest for various applications, including Earth observation, telecommunications, and scientific research. Notable missions include the European Space Agency's GOCE satellite and China's Tiangong space station prototypes, which have successfully operated in VLEO.
Wikipedia
+1

In summary, Very Low Earth Orbit presents a promising area for satellite operations, balancing the benefits of proximity to Earth with the challenges posed by atmospheric conditions. As technology advances, VLEO is expected to play a significant role in future satellite missions and applications.

The European Very Low Earth Orbit electric rocket initiative is focused on advancing air-breathing electric propulsion technology for sustained operations in VLEO. This technology aims to provide long-duration missions without the need for onboard propellant by utilizing atmospheric particles as propellant. The AETHER project has been a significant step forward, demonstrating the effectiveness of air-breathing electric propulsion in compensating atmospheric drag. The project's results have been pivotal in preparing for future missions and advancing Europe's leadership in this area.
aether-h2020.eu

The European Defence Agency has also allocated funds to develop its first VLEO satellite concept, VLEO-DEF, which will be built by a consortium of companies. This initiative is a significant European effort to develop military satellites specifically designed to operate permanently at VLEO, offering advantages such as higher resolution images and lower latency in communications.
milivox.media

The research and development of electric propulsion technologies are crucial for the future of space exploration and communication, with the potential to extend the operational lifetimes of satellites and enable new mission scenarios in VLEO.

The European Very Low Earth Orbit electric rocket initiative is focused on advancing air-breathing electric propulsion technology for sustained operations in VLEO. This technology aims to provide long-duration missions without the need for onboard propellant by utilizing atmospheric particles as propellant. The AETHER project has been a significant step forward, demonstrating the effectiveness of air-breathing electric propulsion in compensating atmospheric drag. The project's results have been pivotal in preparing for future missions and advancing Europe's leadership in this area.
aether-h2020.eu

The European Defence Agency has also allocated funds to develop its first VLEO satellite concept, VLEO-DEF, which will be built by a consortium of companies. This initiative is a significant European effort to develop military satellites specifically designed to operate permanently at VLEO, offering advantages such as higher resolution images and lower latency in communications.
milivox.media

The research and development of electric propulsion technologies are crucial for the future of space exploration and communication, with the potential to extend the operational lifetimes of satellites and enable new mission scenarios in VLEO.

The Europeans have done some work on VELO: https://aether-h2020.eu/
The idea, I believe is to use atmospheric Nitrogen captured as a propellent for an Electric Rocket.

Quote:

The European Very Low Earth Orbit electric rocket initiative is focused on advancing air-breathing electric propulsion technology for sustained operations in VLEO. This technology aims to provide long-duration missions without the need for onboard propellant by utilizing atmospheric particles as propellant. The AETHER project has been a significant step forward, demonstrating the effectiveness of air-breathing electric propulsion in compensating atmospheric drag. The project's results have been pivotal in preparing for future missions and advancing Europe's leadership in this area.
aether-h2020.eu

The European Defence Agency has also allocated funds to develop its first VLEO satellite concept, VLEO-DEF, which will be built by a consortium of companies. This initiative is a significant European effort to develop military satellites specifically designed to operate permanently at VLEO, offering advantages such as higher resolution images and lower latency in communications.
milivox.media

The research and development of electric propulsion technologies are crucial for the future of space exploration and communication, with the potential to extend the operational lifetimes of satellites and enable new mission scenarios in VLEO.

I am guessing that a "Sun Synchronous" VELO orbit is going to be hard to impossible for Earth.

But I have hopes for Venus and Mars.

What I would like to find is a stable perch where a spacecraft could be in a Sun Synchronous Very Low Planet Orbit (VLPO).  And use captured atmosphere and sunlight to maintain that orbit.  Even better than that would be to be able to accumulate propellants.

Note: I think it will probably not work out, but I think it is proper to try.  (Yoda was wrong, 'There is a try')

People who don't try must simply parrot things that have been done before.  It looks intelligent, and it serves a purpose, but it is not maximum intelligence and success).

Some things against success:
-Solar Flare atmospheric expansion.
-Gas mixtures.  (I am hoping for   Venus and Mars to have more N2 or another usable gas in the upper atmosphere, and less CO2.

For Venus primarily and perhaps also for Mars, I am wondering if a ship like a Starship could transit between higher obits and a platform in a sun synchronous Very Low Planet Orbit.

If necessary, we might invoke rotavators for the platform.  This might reduce atmospheric drag, and so then chances might be a bit better.

Isaac Arthur has provided some materials: https://isaacarthur.net/video/upward-bound-skyhooks/
So actual intelligent people have done some work: https://www.niac.usra.edu/files/library … 1Grant.pdf

https://toughsf.blogspot.com/2020/07/te … l-way.html
Image Quote: UMHUgbyHb_wdkoTm23RR_VQS7PjYcTBnQuX5y2km3wVltLyIfX-OrTqxeQOJwoVgc5ZGXtdVGbeBLBSKODal2P2lDRfJKqzSUBNGznSxxfxqutlRo5dXku520Q4PuPpfKaO4hSHN=w640-h339

So, an Air-Breathing Rotavator Perch in Sun Synchronous Low Venus or Low Mars Orbit.

So, for either planet if the perches work, then you can have two specialized spacecraft.
1) -High Orbit to Perch
2a) -For Venus Perch to Floating platforms (Cloud Cities).
2b) -For Mars Perch to Surface.

#1 does not need landing legs.
#2a does not need landing legs, but does need a flotation method.
#2b does need landing legs.

If the Orbit <> Surface or Cloud Cities task is already in a reduced gravity, and is divided into two parts, perhaps the heat shielding technology can be of a lesser dry mass.

IF the Perches can draw gasses from the uppermost atmosphere, they may be able to at least partially refill a spacecraft.

Oxygen is the most likely propellant but perhaps Nitrogen can be involved as well.

Ending Pending smile

#58 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Genetics » 2026-05-07 11:36:28

I tend to believe that a matrix of gene flows are how modern humans came about from the mixing of many outlier versions of humans..  So I am happy about similar thinking emerging.

You can search for this video is you want: "Utube, Discovery, New Skelital and Genetic Evidence Rewrites Neanderthal History, 2h"

As is typical I cannot get the video that I am looking at in my phone, is not available from my computers searches.

The point is that many of us may be more Neanderthal and perhaps other than so far reported.

I would also say that if there were various outliers that over time combined to create the so-called modern types the common genes that are very similar between groups should not be called "Homo Sapiens".

I would say that if so, called humans mixed with Neanderthals, what would be critical was a mind that would invent technology to modify both extremely cold and extremely hot environments, then the extremes of body types would melt away.

If you live in the tropics and do not have to be naked in the hot sun, or if you were a Neanderthal and have sufficient sunlight or artificial means to deal with the cold, then also your "Neanderthal" features would melt away to some extent.

In other words, people from Africa and from Neanderthal, would to some event experience convergent evolution, and arrive at similar body types.

The genes for a better mind could have come from all directions to create a mosaic human, where eventually the mental means to modify, environment would lead to people who more or less resemble the average of humans today.  The extreme body alterations for an extreme climate would melt away.

So, I agree that I am probably less a thing of superiority that came from Africa, but a thing that emerged when favorable genes flowed into a convergence of types.  I may very well be more Neanderthal that anything but the critical features of the mind, I think probably consolidated into modern humans.

I will run with that until a better idea shows up.

Ending Pending smile

#59 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-07 09:43:04

If the previous post turns out to be largely true, then:

The Orbital to Very Low Venus Orbit might be at low enough differential speeds that much less tiling is needed for a heat shield.  Perhaps Stainless Steel, and some active cooling might do.  Probably flaps will not be useful so they would be absent.  Thrusters would be used instead.

This would significantly lighten the spacecraft if true.  It may be that it would refill from Oxygen gathered in the Very Low Venus Orbit.

As for the ship that would travel from the cloud habitats to Very Low Venus orbit, perhaps it would bring Methane to the Very Low Venus Orbit.

For it's return to the cloud settlements it would not have to use major rocket thrust, just air braking and floatation.

However, it would need to have tolerance of Acid and aerobraking heating.  I don't know if regular Stainless steel would do.

Although Venus could perhaps work with SSTO, this would instead be a two-stage system where the upper stage gets refilled in Very Low Venus Orbit.

I don't know for sure that it is workable, but it might be.

Ending Pending smile

It might be that a modified Starship could collect samples from a Very Low Venus orbit and those samples might be presented from further down by a rocket or Balloon system.

Ending Pending smile

#60 Re: Terraformation » Venus » 2026-05-07 07:53:14

Some mornings ideas gel in my mind.  All the sudden several factors understood create what could be a new trick, or set of tricks.

A joyful this about Venus which is not true for Mars, is if life does not exist in its clouds, and none is expected on the surface, then we have a high certainty that their is no life to be concerned about.

Now I am wondering about VELO on Venus.

https://www.satnow.com/community/what-i … orbit-vleo

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_low_Earth_orbit

Quote:

Very Low Earth Orbit (VLEO) refers to orbital altitudes below 400 kilometers (about 250 miles) above the Earth's surface, offering unique advantages for satellite operations.
Definition and Characteristics
Very Low Earth Orbit (VLEO) is defined as the region of space where satellites operate at altitudes typically ranging from 150 to 400 kilometers (approximately 93 to 250 miles). This proximity to Earth allows for several operational benefits, including reduced signal latency and enhanced imaging capabilities.
Wikipedia
+1
Advantages of VLEO
Reduced Signal Latency: Satellites in VLEO can transmit data with significantly lower latency due to their closer distance to Earth, which is crucial for real-time applications like remote sensing and communication networks.
2
Improved Imaging Resolution: The closer proximity allows VLEO satellites to capture higher-resolution images, making them ideal for applications such as environmental monitoring and urban planning.
2
Lower Launch Costs: Launching satellites into VLEO requires less energy compared to higher orbits, potentially reducing overall launch costs and allowing for the use of smaller launch vehicles.
2
Natural Deorbiting: Due to atmospheric drag, VLEO satellites tend to deorbit more quickly at the end of their operational life, which helps mitigate the issue of space debris.
2


3 Sources
Challenges of VLEO
Significant Atmospheric Drag: The denser atmosphere at these altitudes creates substantial drag, necessitating frequent propulsion adjustments to maintain orbit, which can increase operational complexity and fuel requirements.
2
Corrosion and Material Challenges: Satellites in VLEO are exposed to elements like atomic oxygen, which can corrode and damage spacecraft materials, requiring robust design and materials.
2
Shorter Operational Lifespan: The high atmospheric drag can lead to a shorter operational lifespan for satellites unless they are equipped with efficient propulsion systems.
1


3 Sources
Applications
VLEO is gaining interest for various applications, including Earth observation, telecommunications, and scientific research. Notable missions include the European Space Agency's GOCE satellite and China's Tiangong space station prototypes, which have successfully operated in VLEO.
Wikipedia
+1

In summary, Very Low Earth Orbit presents a promising area for satellite operations, balancing the benefits of proximity to Earth with the challenges posed by atmospheric conditions. As technology advances, VLEO is expected to play a significant role in future satellite missions and applications.

I think that VELO may work much better for the as is Venus than for Earth and that Venus might be manipulated for it to work even better than that for Venus.

Factors that may make Venus better for Venus than Earth:

Query:

What is the height of the Atmosphere of Venus  relative to that of the Earth?

Quote:

50 km
The atmosphere of Venus is significantly more massive than that of Earth. On Earth, 90% of the atmosphere is within 10 km of the surface, while on Venus, the same percentage is found at a height of 50 km. This means that Venus's atmosphere is about 90 times more massive than Earth's, extending to much greater heights above the surface.
Wikipedia
+2

Query: "What is the gravity of Venus?"

https://studydaily.blog/venus-gravity-compared-to-earth
Quote:

Venus gravity compared to Earth is approximately 90.4%, meaning a person weighing 100 pounds on Earth would weigh just over 90 pounds on the Venusian surface. While Venus is often referred to as Earth's twin due to its similar size and composition, its gravitational pull is 8.87 m/s², slightly weaker than Earth's standard 9.807 m/s².

So, a VELO orbit of Venus should be considerably higher than for one of Earth.  Reasons are the Temperature of the lower atmosphere, the Lower Gravity, and the Greater Mass of the atmosphere of Venus.

>>>>>>>>>>

Another factor that may make VELO for Venus more attractive is energy density.
Query: "What is the solar flux at the orbit of Venus?"

Quote:

Approximately 2600 W/m²
Solar Flux at the Orbit of Venus
The solar flux at the orbit of Venus is approximately 2600 W/m². This value is significantly higher than the solar flux at Earth, which is about 1360 W/m². The increased solar flux at Venus can significantly enhance the performance of solar-powered vehicles, making it a viable option for space exploration and other

So the solar flux is approximately 1.9 times that of Earth.

Alright so, I think really that VELO for Venus will work a lot better.  And the Atmospheric Drag should be less, if the high atmosphere is relatively depleted of CO2 and Sulfur compounds.  This would be because the orbiter would be moving at a lower relative speed to the atmospheric molecules relative to the situation for Earth's VELO.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

If we discover no life on Venus, then we can feel free to modify the planet.

https://www.popsci.com/science/mars-gli … atmosphere.
Quote:

Researchers think a key ally in thawing out icy, barren wastelands of Mars is glitter—more specifically, literally millions of tons of reflective metallic nanorod particles seeded throughout the Red Planet’s atmosphere. But if that sounds like a huge order, the team calculates their proposal is potentially 5,000 times more efficient than previous ideas.

So, if it could be done for Venus we could raise the VELO orbits for Venus as well.  This would also raise where you could have floating habitants as well.

Some people might think to do this to make the Atmosphere of Venus shed into the Solar Wind.  I would prefer to harvest the molecules to Orbits.

https://theconversation.com/venus-is-lo … ity-229342
https://earthsky.org/space/water-in-ven … eanalysis/
Quote:

New study says water in Venus’ clouds surprisingly abundant
Posted by
Paul Scott Anderson

October 9, 2025

Quote:

Recent studies have revealed that Venus has more water than previously thought.
A new study indicates that Venus is losing water faster than previously estimated, with a process called dissociative recombination causing significant hydrogen loss.
2
The research suggests that Venus has about 60% of its clouds composed of water, which could indicate a more habitable environment for potential microbial life.
1
Overall, the findings challenge previous assumptions about Venus' water levels and its potential for supporting life.
2

These discoveries highlight the complexity of Venus' atmospheric composition and its implications for understanding the planet's history and potential for habitability.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

So, I am thinking that is might be possible to have a VELO atmospheric orbit for Venus that would be relativeliy efficient.

Two layers of spacecraft evolved perhaps from the Starship plan may give access to VELO from higher orbits and to the Cloud cities.

The higher orbital one may not be required to deal with a very acid environment.

The lower one would shuttle between the cloud habitations and VELO.  They would meet in VELO.

Cutting the task in two reduces the air braking heat for both.

The one that takes the lower task might be able to float at 1-10 bars air pressure.  Gain water and liquid CO2 from the floating stations, and also propellants.

The higher one would move from high orbit to VELO, and be refilled with Cargo and propellants there.

The spectrum of other desired materials might come from Venus itself or from Venus Crossing Asteroids.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_V … or_planets
Quote:

Asteroids whose orbits cross that of Venus
Venus-crossing asteroids are asteroids whose orbits cross that of Venus. There are approximately 2,809 known Venus-crossers. These asteroids can pose a risk of collision with Earth due to their chaotic orbits and the potential for their paths to cross Earth's orbital plane. Some of these asteroids are highly eccentric and can become more visible during twilight when their sunlight is obscured by the Sun.
Wikipedia
+2

For more detailed information, you can refer to the sources: Wikipedia and EarthSky.

These seem to be rather small but significant in size, maybe .5 km to 1.5 km in size.  Some "Grazers" seem to be about 4 km in diameter.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

So, if Starship opens up the solar system, it could be that the path is:
Earth>Moon>Mars>Asteroid Belt>Venus Crossers> Venus.

Or Venus may produce water that could go Venus > Venus Crossers.  It is possible that solar sails of Carbon might move the water from Venus orbit to these Venus Crossers.

Venus Crossers > Aero-burn to Venus.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I think I have a reasonable attitude about life on Venus.  If it exists, then protection of it and us from it are important.

This might limit or prohibit what I have proposed.

If there is no Life, then Venus may be a very valuable planet for the human race.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Methods to mine the surface of Venus are probably possible.

Ending Pending smile

#61 Re: Not So Free Chat » Canada / U.S. relations » 2026-05-06 09:42:23

deepstate lobbyists

I do apologize, you are seeming to be more correct.

City of London is said by some to be at the heart of the global game.  (Promethean Actions).  https://www.prometheanaction.com/

I am still considering how much I align with the Promethean Action people.

The seeds of my own suspicions are deeper in time than my exposure to them however.

It is my observation that the Romans were unable to do successful conquest in northern-more regions.

Their method of plunder was to decapitate the rulers of agricultural successful areas and make them provinces and then tax them.  I begin to think that that is why they only went so far north.  The Greeks in the Black Sea, penetrated further into Eurasia as I think the North of the Black Sea will support agricultural abundance.

The Romans withdrew from Britain as it was not paying off.  Very little of the Roman genome remains now it seems.  But the South of the island did support an agricultural abundance for the local rising verbal and violent thug class that became the upper classes.

They managed to pinch off a piece of the Roman Catholic Church and own it. 

Anglicans were allowed in the Colleges, where dead languages were the methods of establishing worth.

Other sects were generally excluded, and I think did not have access to land estates and servants.

So, they started the Industrial Revolution.  I looked it up and cities like Lakinshire, Derryshire, Shoropshire, and Manchester were mentioned.

The Southern Elites did not like industry as it was coal and dirty.  I am sure the old money did not like the new money.

The North/South divide continued in the USA.  Strangely though English to the North and Scots Irish to the South.

The South (East) of course adopted plantations and the North was not as much like that.

The South East of the continent appealed more to the Elites of the UK and France.

Then you have the East India Company and the Empire.  In the American Civil war the UK and France were tempted to join on the side of the Confederacy.  But anti-slavery sentiments in the UK and the Russian Fleet stationed on the East Coast (By Lincoln) discouraged them.

The post Civil war rise of Industrialism of course was not liked by the B. Empire.  It is to be expected.

When the USA began to run short of Oil, the holders of Oil then saw their chance to choke America in the 70's and beyond. 

As I understand it the IRGC?  Has very large holdings of real estate around London.    Some say that the fall of the Shaw of Iron was orchestrated by the British>CIA. 

At any rate we see that the USA is enjoying Oil from various sources now.  And screwing with Lloyds of London in the Persian Gulf.

The purpose of Iran is to raise the price of oil, but that is now benefiting America, (And Canada and Venezuela, etc.).

Yes, we Americans were stupid, but then people like me do not play at the high table at all.  We are supposed to be stupid.

And the addition of Iraq to Iran's power to the instability equation would make it more possible for terrorism to be promoted, to raise the price of oil for OPEC from time to time.  Lloyds if London to make more money then.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

In the Biden Administration we see the attempt with some success to put America back on OPEC oil imports.

The hatred of fracking, in my opinion was generated by an international desire to keep deindustrializing America.  The Oil producers would want American power to only be used to protect them.  In the case of Russia fracking was said to be immoral.

The collaboration of the remnants of Communism and Islam have a like desire to reduce American industry and yet to keep money flowing from a dying America.

The leftist Greens in Europe have unfortunately been able to get a fair amount of this done for Europe.

The intention from the Globalist Elites is suspected to be to try to get a nuclear war going, perhaps between the USA and Russia/China, to reduce the population and to get their power damaged.

Although perhaps not intentional, it is possible that Chernobyl and Fukushima were experiments to see how much nuclear damage can be tolerated.  (Some paranoia there, I admit).

But you might think that pandered elites, have an extremely high idea of their own intelligence and worth.  They might think they want that world where only 1 billion to 2 billion people are left over.  The worst damage to the USA, Russia, and China.

They could weather the war in their fancy bunkers in the Mountains of Switzerland perhaps, and other refuges.

They very radioactive parts can be turned into parks, reserves, or where the weaklings can be pushed to.

So, no, it is not the UK only, but indeed parts of the USA and many other global players may be implicated.

You should be careful as some of those people that are being imported into the UK and Canada may be intended for doing ethnic cleansings of "Indigenous" people who cause trouble.

The Evil Empire whatever you call it seems to exist.

Ending Pending smile

I am ready to change my mind by better evidence, but for now this is my evaluation of reality.

Ending Pending smile

A little more to add.  What happens to a country like Germany who removes their nuclear reactors?  Their reactors do not distribute radiation to Germany.

Paranoid?  The poor Germany poor but less radioactive than many places.  Meanwhile in Switzerland...............Party Time.

In war time, some reactors would be targeted, and some might just malfunction in the disruption.

It would make a good novel, I think.

Ending Pending smile



.............

#62 Re: Not So Free Chat » Peter Zeihan again: and also other thinkers: » 2026-05-06 08:00:47

As a participant of the Sun Belt craze, I find this interesting: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDkiXVyu3KM
Quote:

Why the Sun Belt Is Quietly Falling Apart

UrbanXplain
9.15K subscribers

Yes, I remember it, the Rust Belt was old and stupid.  Glory was in the sun belt.

That and OPEC and Vietnam, such a wonderful way to enter adulthood!

But it worked for me anyway to stay north.

It seems that the Sun Belt is saturating.

It might not be as dark as what is in this video, but it does show that a story told in the 70's and 80's is not told the same in the next century.

Water technology is going to be be very important, I am sure.  And I wonder if electric vehicles (Tesla) will be helpful.

Ending Pending smile

#63 Re: Not So Free Chat » Canada / U.S. relations » 2026-05-05 13:53:43

The Aluminum thing is what I was most interested in.

But, I know about the Globe and Mail and watched Canadian TV when I was a kid.  So, not total ignorant in my case.

Quote the Robert:

As for Iran: the best result Trump can hope for, is to restore the deal that Obama had already made. Oops! Trump won't like that. So how the rest of the US government do that, while spinning it in such a way that Trump claims it's all his idea?

Actually, I think we have had an unexpected windfall,  Very happy.  It turns out that Ukraine has figured out how to deal with Russia-Iran-China warfare.  They have the tools and the Gulf Arabs have money.  We also get the methods.  I felt guilty putting the Ukrainians up against the Russians in a slaughterhouse, but we can't turn that down.

As for your Europeans, they are suspected of becoming Fascist again.  The NAZI idea was that endless killing was needed to purify the human race of weaklings.  The import of immigrates is so that that killing can be facilitated at some point.  The Elites think they can hide in their places in mountains.  The Globalists want to get the population of the planet down to 1 or 2 billion.  The Elites do not particularly belong to any culture such as European or Canadian.  And some are converts to alien religions.  They have no intentions that are good.

The Iranians are not stupid people.  We were stupid when we damaged Iraq and handed it to the Iranians.  I believe the British orchestrated that for us.  The game is to separate what people want from the people who want it and then to make money as the middle men.  As example during the Biden administration the import of oil from the ME. was favored.  We have quite a few of the creeps in our country unfortunately.

Another favor we have gained is that we are a safer provider of Oil and Natural Gas than the Persian/Arabian gulf countries.

I expect that Iran will be forced to give up its enriched nuclear materials, and the Gulf Countries will keep the Ukraine on hire to help them against the Shia factors.  Europe may involve themselves belatedly, for the reason to have some influence as well.

We the People might even consider the Russians as Allies, but I don't want to betray the Ukraine any more than it has been betrayed by the Europeans.

The Russians have some troubles and it is not clear that they are at liberty to push harder.  But if too provoked they also might be pushed into something that is not needed.

This future has good potentials for us.  No guarantees, but potentials.

Ending Pending smile

#64 Re: Not So Free Chat » Canada / U.S. relations » 2026-05-05 13:52:05

The Aluminum thing is what I was most interested in.

But, I know about the Globe and Mail and watched Canadian TV when I was a kid.  So, not total ignorant in my case.

#65 Re: Not So Free Chat » Canada / U.S. relations » 2026-05-05 10:59:58

Well, that is rather political.  I will tend to seek neutrality, as long term these factors will not be predictable.

I am interested in the existence of a Aluminum resource, and the effects on North America and the world.

I will say that the policy of Trump might reduce tariffs for companies that may seek to build in America.  I interpret this as hardening the USA for a potential war economy.  We have evidence that we cannot trust most of our NATO partners.  If Canada goes leftist green, do we want any of our auto industry outside of our borders?  The Auto industry can be harnessed for war materials in a crisis.  It is not a question of anticipating a war situation soon, it is more like toing to the gym to attain fitness.  If you are fit then less people will try to mess with you.

It is quite apparent that outsiders have inflated egos.  Somehow Americans are ignorant hillbillies, even though they share similar genetic and cultural backgrounds.

Our understanding of the results of the conflict in the gulf is not likely to be the same as for Canada, or Germany.  It seems to be said that the Germans were trying to claim that the Iranians were clobbering us.

I have very strong suspicions that retard elites are thinking in very stupid ways as to how to sculpt the future of the human race.  Otherwise, why would the Germans have done so many stupid things?  They are intelligent people, but their leadership keeps doing stupid things.

And the tests of NATO over both Greenland and this newest thing, clearly shows that Europeans and Canadians look down on us and think we are a servant people.  Some stupid people who were useful idiots but are out of control now.  All the more reason we should not trust critical Technology/Industry in the hands of the untrustworthy.

But anyway, if Canada has lots of Aluminum, some will come to the USA, either by future economic terms directly or as scrap Aluminum around the world that came for Canada.  It is not a matter of love or hate, it is that the world could be flooded by Aluminum abundance.

So, concerns about the energy grids may not be as great.  Both Aluminum and Carbon may help those things.

I have noted that the North American Continent has a great deal of solar potential.  Fusion may be competitive though.

However, with cheap Aluminum and new Carbon technologies, and robotics, energy may be well solved for the continent either way.

I anticipate that "Active Solar" may come to dominate.  Robotic Solar that can react to sun position and seasons and weather.

For instance, a humanoid robot with a power tool might be able to run a collection of solar devices to position them sequentially to an advantage.

IF robotics work out then the cost of hardware in part made of Aluminum and Carbon may deflate to the point where such elaborate equipment may be affordable.

I am presuming that whoever owns the Alumina deposit will want to sell it for money.  Probably so, as whoever does not will be pushed out of the way by high powered money people, I am sure.

Ending Pending smile

#66 Re: Not So Free Chat » Canada / U.S. relations » 2026-05-05 08:16:16

I am not interested in this post about contests between nations.

https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/r … 8b0bc19dfe  Quote:

3MIN AGO: Canada's MASSIVE Aluminum Discovery is Shaking Global Supply Chains!
20:10

3MIN AGO: Canada’s MASSIVE Aluminum Discovery Is Shaking Global Supply Chains!
YouTube
Canada Pressroom
1.9K views

The point is that who controls this is then a "Saudi-Arabia" of Aluminum.  Canada presumably, Or an offshoot of such.

Yes, it will tilt politics, but I am more interested in the technological results.  But Canadian money will likely buy things from the USA and Mexico, even if they may (Likely) not like us.

But Aluminum in technology will provide conductors for power grids, and frames for solar panels, and indeed potentially mirrors for solar concentrating mirrors.

The Alumina/Aluminum will seek energy.  Granted, workers are needed but it is likely that Canada  can have many robots in the future.

China/East Asia, and Europe will certainly be interested.

A 2000 year supply of Aluminum could build a lot of solar power method in North America and provide a lot of grid and battery metals.  (Presuming Aluminum Batteries will emerge).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_N … an_deserts
Image Quote: 960px-Deserts_of_North_America.svg.png

While Canada has lots of power to process Aluminum, if the price of Aluminum drops, then solar power may also be enhanced in price, making it useful to also process more Alumina into Aluminum.

This could even effect Mexico.

Granted, fusion power might prove to be more competitive, if it emerges, but the fact of lots of Aluminum says that Solar may be less costly.

Ending Pending smile

#67 Re: Business Proposals » Data Centers (Including Off World) » 2026-05-04 08:06:27

While I am interested in the Ocean methods I have worked towards, I am fully on board with the notion of orbital data centers.  I want that understood.  Typical sports minded people (Who are typical minds), think in terms of binary contests.  I tend not to .

The reason about the nutrients in the Oceans is a comfort to me.

I have lived a life where the powers that have put myself and many other people into prolonged stress.

They do not want western peoples to produce Carbon.

But Energy producers will have not prohibition put on them.  So, then in my world the European??? powers that put the prohibition on Western peoples, have no right to do so, and even though they have tried with all their might to kill Shale and perhaps Tar Sands,  I promote both of them because I know we have been being raped by the world powers.

At this tine as well third world powers have been given license to unlimited expansion of the production of Carbon into the Air.

I am afraid that I think that what has really happened is that upon the use of China to combat the Soviet Union, and the emergence of OPEC, money in the hands of non-western peoples have allow the bending of the will of the west by bribes to western politicians.

The plan was to set up a no-win situation for the West.  But in the Oceans both cold and nutrients, I see a win possibility for the West.

I think also we can factor in the European urge to create the super man.  It should not exist at this point but I think it does.  The idea that conflict and cruelty will kill off the weak and cause the emergences of s superior race.

I will not go into further detail but if you consider the possibility that this is all a game from the elites, who expect to buy they way out of trouble, it could explain WWI and WWI, and how the Europeans have appeared to do every stupid thing to their countries that they could find to do.

If you took Darwinism to heart as many of them probably did, it may be that they often take common people as not worth the air they breathe.

The idea that the application of cruelty can lead to advancement, is an easy choice for the spoiled and lazy minds.

I want to side-step their idiot plans.

Ending Pending smile

#68 Re: Science, Technology, and Astronomy » Genetics » 2026-05-03 10:11:15

I have a desire to express an opinion here about "Pragmata".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmata

And it is only my opinion(s)

I has been a trend for some time at least in the Anglosphere, to demote common men as much as possible.  The State exists in a form of alliance with the female population to squeeze as much as possible out of men as they can for the most minimal cost.

Typical output from British (Pesudo)Science programs are statements like sperm is cheap.

So, we should not be surprised if a masculine reset may be invoked.  The "Looting" can only go on for so long before the exploited members will rebel.

A factor that I believe is true about Diana, is that it resembles a female and to some extent a child.

In humans usually it is a female that seeks adoption into another group.  So, the game "Pregmata" may be accessing the nature of a male to adopt other people particularly a feminine aspect.

It is my belief that the male often may select gracile features preferentially in a female.  This may allow his children to have more advanced human features.  (That is, if you consider neotenous features to be advanced).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans
Image Quote: Human_development_neoteny_body_and_head_proportions_pedomorphy_maturation_aging_growth.png

Diana's large head to body ratio may be attractive for that reason.

Again, my opinion, the female to be adopted, is like a sperm cell from a woman sent to a Man who may receive or reject her.  A sort of intergenerational Sexuality (Not Contaxuality).

I believe that the social order acts in opposition to this, where it is genetically useful to Loot.
Looting is achieved by selecting excessively robust features, and only selecting for intelligence if it has promoted a males status in a group.

So, she may want to run the "Brute Squad", if she can extract benefits from it.

This is not entirely wrong.  If a people became too child-like they may not be fit enough to survive.

It is my opinion that these contrasting forces keep the human race fit.  To select for Neoteny may raise intelligence, and to select for robustness may give the powers to resist predatory forces.

I could go on, but maybe it is good to understand that for a society to remain fit, you cannot just use one feature, even if it helps governing powers to loot the society.

Ending Pending smile

#69 Re: Business Proposals » Data Centers (Including Off World) » 2026-05-03 09:16:16

There will be many situations that may involve continental shelves, but some seamount type islands may not have that situation.

https://hasanjasim.online/the-underwate … ncredible/
Image Quote: xhawaiian-islands-map-underwater-geology-2.jpg.pagespeed.ic_.cvWHPFEAW8.webp

There are claims that new safe small nuclear reactors are possible that when they malfunction will just shut down.

I think that these could be put a distance down on the seafloor of a seamount.  These then being out of reach from most idiots, and protectable by military level forces.  They also be removable by some mobile equipment to be brought to service or disposal.

If these were CO2 turbine, in nature,

These are close enough to the shore that data lines could be laid on the sea floor.  So, then electric and mechanical power available, and the cold also available, the water then heated by the data centers, may bring fertilizer up into the sunlight.

Remote seamount islands might be set up like this, for instance https://xdaysiny.com/pitcairn-island-travel-guide/
Image Quote: Pitcairn-Island-Panoramic-View.jpg
Image Quote: Where-is-Pitcairn-island.jpg

Of course it is British and that than makes the concept international.  We know how much trouble other nations like to produce when possible.

But Here I am just indicating the useful process.

I will admit that sea water is more of a problem to cool data centers than is fresh water.  But I believe it can be done, as Nuclear Subes apparently cool their reactors.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Another method of power might be "White or Natural Hydrogen".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_hydrogen
https://www.dw.com/en/white-hydrogen-th … a-76106804

>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Also solar as you have mentioned by solar concentrating mirrors.

Wind

Wave.

Ending Pending smile

#70 Re: Business Proposals » Data Centers (Including Off World) » 2026-05-02 20:17:07

The elements of the process that I am interested in are:
-Powering Data Centers.
-Cooling Data Centers with deep Ocean stored cold.
-Lifting fertilizer in that water into the photic levels of the ocean water columm.

Several schemes seem possible.

Solar Concentrator is one.

We also could think to use Ice Engines.  (Particularly if a practical source of Hydrogen is available).

Another method would be to use Nuclear to achieve these things.

The resource of the fertile cold ocean water, is massive.  While it might seem that this might be yet another exploitation of the Earth, As I understand it beaming power from space to Earth will not heat up the Earth to the extent that it is claimed CO2 will heat the Earth.

Even burning natural gas to drive this, the fertile waters brought to the sunlight will provide food and sequester some Carbon.

The Major Goal I see, is that we want to protect the tool people from the talk people.  The talk people often talk so as to organize looting of the wealth of the tool people.

I believe that the older the process of civilization has existed in a location the more damaged it is by verbal looters,   They are Verbal Idiot Savants that cannot understand the worth of intelligence other than their own kind.

I believe that without intervention this will lead to the neutering of the human potential and the eventual extinction of the human race.

And so, this is a potential intervention by invention, that can buy time to get the human racc out into the space wilderness that can be its prolonged helper.

Ending Pending smile

#71 Re: Terraformation » The Moon » 2026-05-02 08:31:30

In the question of Moon-Cracks 19 to 20 km deep in some cases.

I wonder if these are places where you could dig deep?

If they open and close with tides, do they develop their own propant?

That is fragments of rock and dust that may fill them?

The Moon shrinks by cooling, and so are these cracks expanding with materials wedged into them?

Then indeed I am hoping that there is an "Atmosphere" in those cracks.  19-20 km.  This is for Americans (11.8060527 Miles)

Query: "How high is the air pressure in the deepest mines on Earth?"

Quote: "The air pressure in the deepest mines on Earth varies significantly based on depth and mine design.
At the Kidd mine, the pressure is approximately 1404 hPa (20.37 psi) at a depth of 2735 meters below sea level.
1
The Mponeng gold mine, which claims to be the deepest mine, operates at a pressure that is about 1.4 times higher than at the surface.
1
The Kola borehole is another deep mine, with a pressure estimated at around 3.6 atmospheres.
1

These variations are due to factors such as temperature gradients and the geological conditions within the mines."

I do understand that on the Moon we have an Exosphere, and whatever gasses are entrained in the Lunar Regolith.

The gravity is 1/6th, and we do not know for sure if the solar wind wicks molecules out of the cracks, Of if processes may fill the cracks with molecules.

It has been said by some that these cracks may be sources of Nitrogen and Carbon Compounds.

I have to wonder if on occasion Hydrogen and Helium bonded with Oxygen may also enter and accumulate.

If there are gas accumulations, I expect the maximum pressure to be well below one millibar.  But still that might be a useful resource.
If it could be accessed.

Ending Pending smile

#72 Re: Business Proposals » Data Centers (Including Off World) » 2026-05-02 08:29:23

kdb512,

I am very pleased.  Thank You.

I did a quick read and do like it.

It needs digesting.

Also I have social obligations today, but I really want to get back to your ideas and continue with them.

I believe that you have practical knowledge in these matters which is very valuable.

Ending Pending smile

#73 Re: Business Proposals » Data Centers (Including Off World) » 2026-05-01 09:12:19

Well, I have been trying to figure out if there could be anyway to associate waver power, Data Centers, and a Space Port in the Ocean.

Here is an attempt: UJ7R29z.png

The waver power machines may buffer the shock of storms, so then protecting the floating space port platform.

The "Compression Stack" would depend from the Space Platform and help stabilize it.

The compression stack would have a series of increasingly compressed chambers, to prevent crushing.  It would be used to obtain cold from the ocean depths, for Data Center activities.

By pushing heat into the cold ocean it would also cause nutrients to rise up in the water column into the sunlight.

The Stack would be far enough down that a crash or explosion on the landing platform might not destroy the "Stack".

uuJy7SA.png

Obviously needs more baking, it is half baked at this point.  Half baked means it may need some more baking.  Not a wrong thing.

So, then these many parts might fit together and we also sequester Carbon and get food.

Ending Pending smile

#74 Re: Terraformation » The Moon » 2026-05-01 08:44:17

Space Startup News, has speculated that expended rocket stages can be crashed on the Moon, to recover their materials.

This is said to be propellant efficient as the speed of impact can be low enough that recoverable materials like Aluminum and Plastics are possible.

https://www.youtube.com/@SpaceStartupNews

https://www.michelegargiulo.com/blog/wh … ike-a-bell
Quote:

Michele Gargiulo
Blog
Bio Page
Author
Gallery
Contact
0
When the Moon Rang Like a Bell: NASA’s Apollo Mystery That Still Echoes
Jun 7
Written By Michele Edington (formerly Michele Gargiulo)
There are sounds we expect from the sky like thunder rolling across summer clouds, wind threading through bare branches, or the quiet breathlessness between stars, but when astronauts deliberately struck the Moon in 1969, they discovered something unexpected: vibration.

It also lasted far longer than anyone could’ve possibly predicted, for nearly an hour. The Moon actually resonated.

Mission scientists later described it with a phrase that still is alive today throughout history: “the Moon rang like a bell.” Now, science is a curious thing, the moon didn’t chime like metal in space, but its seismic response behaved unlike anything seen on Earth.

This is the story of what really happened when Apollo instruments listened to the Moon, and what those echoes still teach us.

The process of impacting spent rocket stages on the moon might allow the greater discovery of the nature of the Moons interior.

Seismometers place about on the Moon could register the results of a planned impact, ant the nature of that impactor will help to understand that results.

For my part I am interested in Moon Cracks that may extend as deep as 20 km, and also the extinct volcano's that exist.

My intention is to seek these items as sources of materials that can become resources.

Ending Pending smile

#75 Re: Terraformation » The Moon » 2026-04-28 19:07:52

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUMVT7Nddw8
Quote:

Elon Musk knows who will be the first to live on the Moon. And it won't be us

AstroScope

The Optimus will need an improved cooling method for its motors to work on the Moon.

Robots will not need much water, but it would be nice to have some.

Quote:

On the Moon, water molecules are observed to bounce around during the day due to their thermal desorption.
Using NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), scientists have found that water molecules remain bound to the lunar soil until surface temperatures peak near noon.
At that point, they thermally desorb and can migrate to cooler areas, where they can stick to the regolith or populate the Moon's atmosphere until temperatures drop again.
3
This phenomenon is crucial for understanding the lunar water cycle and its potential for future lunar exploration.
3

Thus, the movement of water molecules is a significant aspect of lunar water dynamics.

So, my question is can mobile molecules collect in deep cracks on the Moon?

Query: "Lunar Cracks 19 km deep?"

Quote:

Yes, there are cracks on the Moon that are significant in depth.
The Moon has deep scars from billions of years of asteroid impacts, with some cracks penetrating up to 20 kilometers below the surface.
1
Additionally, there are grabens, which are long valleys formed by the Moon's crust dropping between diverging faults, indicating ancient tectonic activity.
2
These features are part of the Moon's geological history, showcasing the Moon's past and ongoing geological activity.
2

Thus, the Moon is indeed characterized by deep cracks and significant geological features.

So, there may be gasses that accumulate in these cracks, perhaps sourced from broke rock in the cracks, perhaps Carbon.  But might Hydrogen containing molecules fall into the cracks and accumulate?

The Moon will flex with the tide of Sun/Earth/Moon.  Impacts also may disturb the cracks.  Do gasses erupt from the cracks if the tide closes them a bit more than normal?

Is there a way to collect the presumed gas accumulations?

This resource if it exists would possibly be available at lower latitudes where you might want to have a mass driver system.

Ending Pending smile

  1. Index
  2. » Search
  3. » Posts by Void

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB